0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Supplementary Material: Sisfall, A Fall and Movement Dataset

Uploaded by

ss Mugdho
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Supplementary Material: Sisfall, A Fall and Movement Dataset

Uploaded by

ss Mugdho
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

1

Supplementary Material: SisFall, A Fall and


Movement Dataset
A. Sucerquia, J.D. López, J.F. Vargas-Bonilla
SISTEMIC, Facultad de Ingenierı́a, Universidad de Antiquia UDEA
Calle 70 No. 52-21, Tel.: +57-4-2198561, Medellı́n, Colombia
[email protected]

I. R ESULTS
In this document we include tables with results of all 14 features tested (listed in Table IV of the paper). Table S1 shows the
effect of filtering as preprocessing stage (paper Fig. 3) after a 10-fold cross-validation with all subjects (validation accuracy,
mean and standard deviation).

TABLE S1
ACCURACY OBTAINED IN VALIDATION (451 TRIALS ) AFTER A 10- FOLD CROSS - VALIDATION WITHOUT- ( RAW DATA ) AND WITH PREPROCESSING
( FILTERED ).

Feature Raw data Filtered


C1 84.71 ± 1.39 88.81 ± 2.01
C2 89.82 ± 1.30 95.01 ± 1.18
C3 86.82 ± 1.10 91.97 ± 1.39
C4 84.68 ± 1.78 86.41 ± 1.21
C5 86.93 ± 1.10 88.37 ± 1.40
C6 84.14 ± 1.92 79.89 ± 2.13
C7 84.51 ± 2.05 85.91 ± 1.51
C8 92.77 ± 1.19 96.15 ± 0.75
C9 89.67 ± 1.14 91.45 ± 1.38
C10 88.30 ± 1.64 88.52 ± 1.85
C11 90.65 ± 1.27 87.88 ± 1.44
C12 87.02 ± 1.13 86.47 ± 1.62
C13 92.81 ± 1.11 90.21 ± 1.31
C14 85.41 ± 2.36 85.06 ± 1.49

Table S2 shows results of training the algorithm with young people and validating with two groups: young and elderly
people (paper Table V).

TABLE S2
S ENSITIVITY (SE), SPECIFICITY (SP) AND ACCURACY (AC) AFTER TRAINING WITH YOUNG ADULTS AND VALIDATING EITHER WITH YOUNG ADULTS
(355 TRIALS ) OR ELDERLY PEOPLE (968 TRIALS ).

Young Elderly
Feature
SE SP AC SE SP AC
C1 93.79 ± 1.92 78.97 ± 4.60 86.38 ± 2.37 76.00 96.42 86.21
C2 94.28 ± 1.88 96.13 ± 1.22 95.21 ± 1.17 77.33 97.65 87.49
C3 98.53 ± 0.85 80.50 ± 3.26 89.51 ± 1.84 84.00 96.42 90.21
C4 95.50 ± 1.30 75.41 ± 3.62 85.45 ± 2.14 66.67 85.33 76.00
C5 97.13 ± 1.65 81.40 ± 2.48 89.27 ± 1.23 89.33 76.48 82.91
C6 81.80 ± 3.04 87.96 ± 2.06 84.88 ± 1.88 52.00 89.36 70.68
C7 83.73 ± 2.24 87.73 ± 2.45 85.73 ± 1.43 66.67 91.27 78.97
C8 95.54 ± 1.24 96.38 ± 1.43 95.96 ± 0.72 85.33 98.10 91.72
C9 97.80 ± 1.62 80.70 ± 3.35 89.25 ± 1.96 88.00 96.42 92.21
C10 91.97 ± 2.31 80.18 ± 3.34 86.08 ± 1.38 82.67 94.29 88.48
C11 88.47 ± 3.29 93.83 ± 1.01 91.15 ± 1.77 68.00 93.84 80.92
C12 95.64 ± 1.15 73.44 ± 3.77 84.54 ± 1.95 73.33 91.94 82.64
C13 92.56 ± 1.20 94.41 ± 1.50 93.49 ± 0.86 62.67 95.19 78.93
C14 81.75 ± 3.09 90.87 ± 2.28 86.31 ± 2.32 58.67 86.00 72.33
2

Table S3 (corresponding to paper Table VI) shows results of validating with elderly people after training with young adults
(test 1), and after training and validating exclusively with elderly people (test 2).

TABLE S3
VARIATION IN ACCURACY AND THRESHOLD T1 AFTER TRAINING EXCLUSIVELY WITH YOUNG BUT VALIDATING WITH ELDERLY PEOPLE ( TEST 1), AND
THEN TRAINING AND VALIDATING WITH ELDERLY PEOPLE ( TEST 2).

AC [%] with elderly Threshold T1


Feature
Test 1 Test 2 Test 1 Test 2
C1 86.21 84.48 ± 5.89 1.27 ± 0.002 1.04 ± 0.069
C2 87.49 90.45 ± 5.19 1.07 ± 0.029 0.97 ± 0.012
C3 90.21 90.85 ± 7.25 1.48 ± 0.017 1.23 ± 0.024
C4 76.00 79.47 ± 4.64 2.00 ± 0.001 1.56 ± 0.112
C5 82.91 82.76 ± 4.39 0.53 ± 0.004 0.27 ± 0.008
C6 70.68 74.62 ± 8.48 0.54 ± 0.014 0.33 ± 0.032
C7 78.97 81.62 ± 8.18 8.08 ± 0.312 4.97 ± 0.092
C8 91.72 92.36 ± 6.80 0.40 ± 0.005 0.36 ± 0.003
C9 92.21 92.58 ± 7.09 0.43 ± 0.009 0.36 ± 0.002
C10 88.48 90.58 ± 4.36 1.93 ± 0.020 1.86 ± 0.006
C11 80.92 83.44 ± 5.74 1.36 ± 0.002 1.23 ± 0.047
C12 82.64 83.66 ± 7.40 0.09 ± 5.34e-05 0.09 ± 0.001
C13 78.93 80.73 ± 5.62 0.08 ± 9.35e-05 0.07 ± 0.002
C14 72.33 76.79 ± 6.20 1.03 ± 0.002 0.95 ± 0.020

Table S4 shows validation results of all 14 features with threshold T2 tested on all 38 subjects (paper Table VII)

TABLE S4
S PECIFICITY (SP) AND ACCURACY (AC) AFTER TESTING DATA FROM ALL SUBJECTS WITH THRESHOLD T2 .

Feature SP AC
C1 49.11 ± 4.22 74.53 ± 2.08
C2 32.97 ± 6.46 66.43 ± 3.06
C3 59.04 ± 5.56 79.49 ± 2.71
C4 37.66 ± 5.56 68.80 ± 2.70
C5 34.54 ± 7.06 67.24 ± 3.44
C6 7.48 ± 1.09 53.71 ± 0.52
C7 26.41 ± 1.63 63.18 ± 0.80
C8 38.34 ± 5.59 69.14 ± 2.71
C9 67.97 ± 2.86 83.96 ± 1.37
C10 39.52 ± 4.47 69.70 ± 2.13
C11 27.78 ± 5.24 63.86 ± 2.53
C12 47.64 ± 4.18 73.79 ± 2.09
C13 37.80 ± 3.42 68.87 ± 1.69
C14 24.31 ± 2.69 62.12 ± 1.32
3

II. I NDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY ANALYSIS


This section includes figures with the individual activity analysis of the other 13 features (C8 is shown in paper Fig. 4).

2.5

2
C1

1.5 T
1

0.5
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
Fig. S1. Maximum value per activity obtained with C1 .

2
C2

T1
1

0
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
Fig. S2. Maximum value per activity obtained with C2 .

3
C3

2
T1

0
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15

Fig. S3. Maximum value per activity obtained with C3 .


C6 C5 C4

0
4
6
8
10
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3

2 T
T

1
T1
1
D01 D01 D01
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09

Fig. S6. Maximum value per activity obtained with C6 .


Fig. S5. Maximum value per activity obtained with C5 .
Fig. S4. Maximum value per activity obtained with C4 .
D10 D10 D10
D11 D11 D11
D12 D12 D12
D13 D13 D13
D14 D14 D14
D15 D15 D15
D16 D16 D16
D17 D17 D17
D18 D18 D18
D19 D19 D19
F01 F01 F01
F02 F02 F02
F03 F03 F03
F04 F04 F04
F05 F05 F05
F06 F06 F06
F07 F07 F07
F08 F08 F08
F09 F09 F09
F10 F10 F10
F11 F11 F11
F12 F12 F12
F13 F13 F13
F14 F14 F14
F15 F15 F15
4
C10 C9
C7

0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1

1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60

D01 D01

T1
T1
T1
D01
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09

Fig. S8. Maximum value per activity obtained with C9 .


Fig. S7. Maximum value per activity obtained with C7 .

Fig. S9. Maximum value per activity obtained with C10 .


D10 D10 D10
D11 D11 D11
D12 D12 D12
D13 D13 D13
D14 D14 D14
D15 D15 D15
D16 D16 D16
D17 D17 D17
D18 D18 D18
D19 D19 D19
F01 F01 F01
F02 F02 F02
F03 F03 F03
F04 F04 F04
F05 F05 F05
F06 F06 F06
F07 F07 F07
F08 F08 F08
F09 F09 F09
F10 F10 F10
F11 F11 F11
F12 F12 F12
F13 F13 F13
F14 F14 F14
F15 F15 F15
5
C13 C12 C11

0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3

0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
T
D01 D01 D01

T1
T1
1
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09

Fig. S12. Maximum value per activity obtained with C13 .


Fig. S11. Maximum value per activity obtained with C12 .
Fig. S10. Maximum value per activity obtained with C11 .
D10 D10 D10
D11 D11 D11
D12 D12 D12
D13 D13 D13
D14 D14 D14
D15 D15 D15
D16 D16 D16
D17 D17 D17
D18 D18 D18
D19 D19 D19
F01 F01 F01
F02 F02 F02
F03 F03 F03
F04 F04 F04
F05 F05 F05
F06 F06 F06
F07 F07 F07
F08 F08 F08
F09 F09 F09
F10 F10 F10
F11 F11 F11
F12 F12 F12
F13 F13 F13
F14 F14 F14
F15 F15 F15
6
C14

0
0.5
1
1.5

T
D01

1
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09

Fig. S13. Maximum value per activity obtained with C14 .


D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
7

You might also like