Supplementary Material: Sisfall, A Fall and Movement Dataset
Supplementary Material: Sisfall, A Fall and Movement Dataset
I. R ESULTS
In this document we include tables with results of all 14 features tested (listed in Table IV of the paper). Table S1 shows the
effect of filtering as preprocessing stage (paper Fig. 3) after a 10-fold cross-validation with all subjects (validation accuracy,
mean and standard deviation).
TABLE S1
ACCURACY OBTAINED IN VALIDATION (451 TRIALS ) AFTER A 10- FOLD CROSS - VALIDATION WITHOUT- ( RAW DATA ) AND WITH PREPROCESSING
( FILTERED ).
Table S2 shows results of training the algorithm with young people and validating with two groups: young and elderly
people (paper Table V).
TABLE S2
S ENSITIVITY (SE), SPECIFICITY (SP) AND ACCURACY (AC) AFTER TRAINING WITH YOUNG ADULTS AND VALIDATING EITHER WITH YOUNG ADULTS
(355 TRIALS ) OR ELDERLY PEOPLE (968 TRIALS ).
Young Elderly
Feature
SE SP AC SE SP AC
C1 93.79 ± 1.92 78.97 ± 4.60 86.38 ± 2.37 76.00 96.42 86.21
C2 94.28 ± 1.88 96.13 ± 1.22 95.21 ± 1.17 77.33 97.65 87.49
C3 98.53 ± 0.85 80.50 ± 3.26 89.51 ± 1.84 84.00 96.42 90.21
C4 95.50 ± 1.30 75.41 ± 3.62 85.45 ± 2.14 66.67 85.33 76.00
C5 97.13 ± 1.65 81.40 ± 2.48 89.27 ± 1.23 89.33 76.48 82.91
C6 81.80 ± 3.04 87.96 ± 2.06 84.88 ± 1.88 52.00 89.36 70.68
C7 83.73 ± 2.24 87.73 ± 2.45 85.73 ± 1.43 66.67 91.27 78.97
C8 95.54 ± 1.24 96.38 ± 1.43 95.96 ± 0.72 85.33 98.10 91.72
C9 97.80 ± 1.62 80.70 ± 3.35 89.25 ± 1.96 88.00 96.42 92.21
C10 91.97 ± 2.31 80.18 ± 3.34 86.08 ± 1.38 82.67 94.29 88.48
C11 88.47 ± 3.29 93.83 ± 1.01 91.15 ± 1.77 68.00 93.84 80.92
C12 95.64 ± 1.15 73.44 ± 3.77 84.54 ± 1.95 73.33 91.94 82.64
C13 92.56 ± 1.20 94.41 ± 1.50 93.49 ± 0.86 62.67 95.19 78.93
C14 81.75 ± 3.09 90.87 ± 2.28 86.31 ± 2.32 58.67 86.00 72.33
2
Table S3 (corresponding to paper Table VI) shows results of validating with elderly people after training with young adults
(test 1), and after training and validating exclusively with elderly people (test 2).
TABLE S3
VARIATION IN ACCURACY AND THRESHOLD T1 AFTER TRAINING EXCLUSIVELY WITH YOUNG BUT VALIDATING WITH ELDERLY PEOPLE ( TEST 1), AND
THEN TRAINING AND VALIDATING WITH ELDERLY PEOPLE ( TEST 2).
Table S4 shows validation results of all 14 features with threshold T2 tested on all 38 subjects (paper Table VII)
TABLE S4
S PECIFICITY (SP) AND ACCURACY (AC) AFTER TESTING DATA FROM ALL SUBJECTS WITH THRESHOLD T2 .
Feature SP AC
C1 49.11 ± 4.22 74.53 ± 2.08
C2 32.97 ± 6.46 66.43 ± 3.06
C3 59.04 ± 5.56 79.49 ± 2.71
C4 37.66 ± 5.56 68.80 ± 2.70
C5 34.54 ± 7.06 67.24 ± 3.44
C6 7.48 ± 1.09 53.71 ± 0.52
C7 26.41 ± 1.63 63.18 ± 0.80
C8 38.34 ± 5.59 69.14 ± 2.71
C9 67.97 ± 2.86 83.96 ± 1.37
C10 39.52 ± 4.47 69.70 ± 2.13
C11 27.78 ± 5.24 63.86 ± 2.53
C12 47.64 ± 4.18 73.79 ± 2.09
C13 37.80 ± 3.42 68.87 ± 1.69
C14 24.31 ± 2.69 62.12 ± 1.32
3
2.5
2
C1
1.5 T
1
0.5
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
Fig. S1. Maximum value per activity obtained with C1 .
2
C2
T1
1
0
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
Fig. S2. Maximum value per activity obtained with C2 .
3
C3
2
T1
0
D01
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
F01
F02
F03
F04
F05
F06
F07
F08
F09
F10
F11
F12
F13
F14
F15
0
4
6
8
10
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
2 T
T
1
T1
1
D01 D01 D01
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
D01 D01
T1
T1
T1
D01
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
T
D01 D01 D01
T1
T1
1
D02 D02 D02
D03 D03 D03
D04 D04 D04
D05 D05 D05
D06 D06 D06
D07 D07 D07
D08 D08 D08
D09 D09 D09
0
0.5
1
1.5
T
D01
1
D02
D03
D04
D05
D06
D07
D08
D09