Module 1.1 - Intro and Definition
Module 1.1 - Intro and Definition
Module 1.1
Learning Objectives:
Identify the geographic, linguistic and ethnic dimensions of Philippine literary history
from pre-colonial to the contemporary.
Differentiate/compare and contrast the various 21st century literary genres and the ones
from the earlier genres/periods citing their elements, structures and traditions.
…. that literature ….
May be classified into five categories or genres: (1) prose
fiction, (2) poetry, (3) drama, (4) nonfiction prose and (5)
creative nonfiction?
While all are art forms, each with its own requirements of
structure and style, usually the first three are classified as imaginative literature. The genres of
imaginative literature have much in common, but they have also distinguishing characteristics.
Prose fiction is an imaginary story, usually written down, that someone tells in everyday,
natural language. It generally uses a variety of techniques such as narrative and has a wide range
in terms of length. It deals, in part or in whole, with information or events that are not factual,
but rather, imaginary or invented by the author. Works of prose fiction usually focus on one or a
few major characters and undergo some kind of change as they interact with other characters and
deal with problems. Examples of prose fiction include novels, short stories, fables, fairy tales,
legends but it now also encompasses films, comic books, and video games.
Poetry is a literary art where the evocative and aesthetic qualities of language are brought
out in lieu, or together with the language's apparent meaning. It is writing that communicates
economically, intensely, and intimately through and beyond language,} relying heavily on
imagery, figurative language, and sound effect devices.
However, the distinction between fiction and nonfiction has been blurred in recent
years. Fictionists (writers of fiction) have based their stories on real life events and characters
(nonfiction), and historians (writers of nonfiction) have incorporated imagined dialogue (fiction)
to suggest the thoughts of historical figures. This kind of writing is called creative nonfiction. It
is a genre of writing that uses literary styles and techniques to create factually accurate
narratives. Journals of self-expression, letters, magazine articles, and other expressions of
imagination can be legitimately either fiction or nonfiction are examples of this kind of writing.
Introduction
Literature is literally "acquaintance with letters." It has its Latin derivation "litera" which
means individual written character (letter). The term has generally come to identify a collection
of texts or work of art, which in Western culture are mainly prose, nonfiction and non-fiction,
drama and poetry. Literature is a branch of aesthetics, a branch of philosophy that deals with
question "What is art".
The word "literature" has different meanings depending on who is using it and in what
context. It could be applied broadly to mean any symbolic record encompassing everything from
images and sculptures to letters. In a more narrow sense the term could mean only text composed
of letters, or other examples of symbolic written language, but in the broader sense, literature is
"life "itself for it has in its scope man's feelings and emotions. In other words, it is about
experiences- records of man's everyday struggle for life.
(Essay)
by Antonino Soria de Veyra
Region 8- Eastern Visayas
The first definition he lists is: 1literature is "imaginative writing"-that is, fiction as
opposed to factual writing. And perhaps most of us would agree with this, until Eagleton points
out that not all texts considered literature are fictional (he points to Francis Bacon's essays and
John Donne's sermons as proof) nor are all fiction pieces considered literature (citing Superman
comic books as an example).
Eagleton then turns his attention to the definition of literature as, quoting Roman
Jakobson, "a kind of writing which ... represents an 'organized violence committed on ordinary
speech'." This kind of writing "uses language in peculiar ways" not necessarily to communicate
ideas or emotions but to focus attention on language itself (just like some abstract paintings use
paint not to attempt any representation of actual objects but to foreground in our perception the
materiality of the medium). And when we think of some literary pieces (James Joyce's
Finnegan's Wake comes easily to mind), this definition seems apt. But then Eagleton asks, what
is "ordinary language"? How do we know a particular speech is a deviation and not just a
community's different way of expressing an idea or emotion? And how come figurative language
is just as common in "ordinary language" as it is in so-called literary texts?
And, Eagleton asks, what if we insist on reading as literary a text that wasn't really meant
to be literature-even if its language is apparently referential and its intent pragmatic? Eagleton
uses the example of a drunken man reading more than is "intended" in a notice that reads: "Dogs
must be carried on the escalator." Should texts with self- referential and non-pragmatic language
necessarily qualify it as literature?
Seems not. There are no inherent qualities that make a text literary. Eagleton says
literature is a "construct"-it is what a particular group of people at a particular point in time says
it is. Why they say so is a matter of value-judgment, of their subjective evaluation of texts. What
a particular group says is reflective of their "ideology"-by which Eagleton defines "roughly, [as]
the ways in which what we say and believe connects with the power structure and power-
relations of the society we live in" and, more particularly, as "those modes of feeling, valuing,
perceiving and believing which have some kind of relation to the maintenance and reproduction
of social power."
What we would call literature, then, may seem a product of our subjective valuation of
certain texts. But these valuations, according to Eagleton, "have their roots in deeper structures
of belief which are apparently unshakeable."
Perhaps it is wise to ponder, as a Literature student, what texts do we call literature? And
why? And should we, can we, break away from how literature is currently defined? How would
that literature look like? What makes literature "Literature"?
Which question is exactly what Culler asks in his Literary Theory: A Very Short
Introduction. Not satisfied with the idea of literature as a "construct," Culler interrogates "what
makes us (or some other society) treat something as literature?" He then focuses on what we do
when we treat something as literature.
First off, he says, we consider texts as literary when language is foregrounded. When the
language of the text catches our attention, it makes us think about how something is being said.
We begin to focus on the text's form. Secondly, Culler continues, literature integrates language to
form-what he refers to as "sound is echo to the sense." This foregrounding and integration of
language makes the literary text "a linguistic event which projects a fictional world" whose
"relation to the [actual] world [becomes] a matter of interpretation." This makes a literary work
an aesthetic object "because, with other communicative functions initially bracketed and
suspended, it engages readers to consider the interrelation between form and content." It also
makes literary texts as "intertextual or self-reflexive constructs" whose meaning is found in its
relations to other texts-literary and otherwise.
Culler concludes by saying that "the question what is literature?" matters because recent]
theory has highlighted the literariness of texts of all sorts. To reflect on literariness is to keep
before us, as resources for analyzing these discourses, reading practices elicited by literature: the
suspension of the demand for immediate intelligibility, reflection on the implications of means of
expression, and attention to how meaning is made and pleasure produced."
The following diverse definitions of literature exhibit the creative genius of its authors.
Arnold: Literature is the best of what has been thought and written. Poetry at least, is an
imitation of a noble action and ought to impart pleasure by permitting a "vent in action" of
emotions which would otherwise be stifling. ("Preface to the Poems")
Corneille: Literature is the execution in language of a number of rules that govern how
to render an imitation of events gracefully and according to form and verisimilitude. (Three
Discourses on Dramatic Poetry")
Johnson: Literature is an imitation which has been judged to have value in a period of
centuries as true but general reflection of human nature in a variety of real or imaginary
circumstances. ("Preface to Shakespeare")
Longinus: Literature is written work that causes or fails to cause the experience of the
sublime-awe attached to terror. ("On the Sublime")
Mukarovsky: Literature is language that draws attention to the mode of expression itself
and thereby goes beyond merely describing or communicating ideas
Pope: Literature is an imitation of a nature that is executed not by copying nature directly
but rather by imitating the works and techniques of previous writers who are somehow "close" to
nature and to the original. ("An Essay on Criticism)
Shlovsky: Literature defamiliarizes the familiar; that is, it caused us to see the ordinary in
a way that jolts us out automatic ways of perceiving and acting. ("Art as Technique")
Chapter Exercises 1.1
Reflection Paper: