Oman-Guideline On Good Pharmacovigilance Practices
Oman-Guideline On Good Pharmacovigilance Practices
Ministry of Health
Directorate General of Pharmaceutical Affairs and Drug Control
Version 1, 2017
Contents
Chapter Page
1. Introduction 3
4. Pharmacovigilance Inspection 7
9. Signal Management 20
Acronyms 29
References 30
Pharmacovigilance (PV) has been defined by the World health Organization (WHO) as the
science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention
of adverse effects or any other medicine related problem.
This guideline has been developed to bring guidance on the requirements, procedures,
roles and activities in the field of PV, for Marketing Authorization Holders (MAH) of
medicinal products for human use in Oman. Pharmacovigilance obligations apply to all
products available in Oman, including the registered and non-registered products.
The requirements explained in this guideline are based on the Guideline on Good
Pharmacovigilance Practice (GVP) for Arab Countries for Medicinal Products for Human
Use (Version 2), International Conference for Harmonization (ICH) and the European
Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines.
The MAH shall have permanently and continuously at its disposal an appropriately QPPV
resident in Oman or any other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) country. For multinational
MAHs, who do not have a scientific office in any of the GCC countries can designate a local
safety responsible (LSR), on behalf of the local agent in Oman. For local MAHs, there should
be a dedicated QPPV and he/she should be resident in Oman. The names and 24 hours
contact details of the nominated QPPV and his alternate during absence should be
submitted to DPV&DI.
The MAH shall ensure that the QPPV has acquired adequate theoretical and practical
knowledge for the performance of PV activities. The QPPVs should have a minimum of
bachelor degree in pharmacy or medicine, a basic training in epidemiology and biostatistics
is desirable.
Location of PSMF
The PSMF shall be located (physically) either at the site where the main
pharmacovigilance activities of the marketing authorization holder are performed or at
the site where the QPPV operates.
Contents of PSMF
The PSMF contents and format shall be according to the current version of Arab GVP.
For the structure and process of Pharmacovigilance Inspection, refer to the current
version of Arab GVP.
What routine PV inspection may include
Obligations of MAH
Marketing authorization holders with authorized products and applicants who have
submitted new applications are subject to pharmacovigilance inspections. Therefore, both
have responsibilities in relation to inspections, including but not limited to the following:
To ensure that the sites viz., the manufacturing site/the-scientific office responsible
for PV activities/Local agent in the country, selected for inspection, which may
include firms employed by the marketing authorization holder to perform
pharmacovigilance activities, agree to be inspected before the inspection is
performed.
To ensure that appropriate and timely corrective and preventive action plans are
implemented to address findings observed during an inspection, with appropriate
prioritization of critical and/or major findings.
The MAHs shall submit global/EU or Core RMP as part of the risk management system.
Taking all appropriate actions to minimize the risks of their medicines and
maximize the benefits including ensuring the accuracy of all information produced
by the company in relation to its medicines, and actively updating and
communicating it when new information becomes available.
The RMP is divided into several parts, with the safety specifications of the RMP organized
into modules to increase flexibility.
Note:
Generic products are exempted from submission of RMPs, however on request they need to
adhere to any new safety measures as part of the RMP on request from the DPV & DI.
During New Registration of medicinal products, RMP shall be submitted along with eCTD
dossier. Any RMP updates need shall be submitted to DPV & DI with a copy to Registration
Section in Drug control department. The MAH is obliged to submit RMP on an emerging
safety issue in situations that has particular reference to a region as well, on request from
the DPV & DI.
In this context, the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions is possible by all health
care providers, consumers and MAH by means of:
2. MAH shall establish mechanisms enabling the traceability and follow-up of adverse
reaction reports while complying with the data protection legislation.
Pharmacovigilance data and documents relating to individual authorized
medicinal products shall be retained as long as the product is authorized and for
at least 10 years after the marketing authorization has ceased to exist.
Spontaneous reports
MAHs shall record all reports of suspected adverse reactions originating from within or
outside Oman, which are brought to their attention spontaneously by healthcare
Solicited reports
MAHs shall record all reports of suspected adverse reactions originating from within or
outside Oman, which occur in post-authorization studies, initiated, managed, or financed
by them.
MAHs should have a system in place to ensure that reports of suspected adverse reactions
related to falsified medicinal products or to quality defects of a medicinal product are
investigated in a timely fashion and that confirmed quality defects are notified separately
to the manufacturer and to DPV & DI.
In the case of medicinal products derived from human blood or human plasma,
haemovigilance procedures may also apply. Therefore, the MAH should have a system in
place to communicate suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious
agent to the manufacturer, the relevant blood establishment(s) to DPV & DI, DGPA & DC,
Oman.
Events may occur, which do not fall within the definition of reportable valid ICSRs, and thus
are not subject to the reporting requirements, even though they may lead to changes in the
known risk-benefit balance of a medicinal product and/or impact on public health.
Therefore, they should be notified as Emerging Safety Issues in writing to the DPV & DI,
DGPA & DC, Oman where the medicinal product is authorized or available; this should be
done immediately on becoming aware of them.
During this period, the MAH is not mandated to follow any reporting modality unless there
is any emerging safety issue that need to be communicated to DPV & DI either manually or
through the MOH website.
Serious domestic valid ICSRs shall be reported to DPV & DI, DGPA & DC, Oman, by
MAHs within 15 days from the date of receipt of the reports;
Non-serious domestic valid ICSRs shall be reported to DPV & DI, DGPA & DC, Oman
by MAHs within 90 days from the date of receipt of the reports.
Periodic safety update reports (PSURs) are PV documents intended to provide an evaluation of
the risk-benefit balance of a medicinal product for submission by MAHs at defined time
points during the post-authorization phase.
The PSUR should focus on summary information, scientific safety assessment and
integrated benefit-risk evaluation.
The obligations imposed in respect of PSURs should be proportionate to the risks posed
by medicinal products. PSUR reporting should therefore be linked to the risk
management systems of a medicinal product. As part of the assessment, it should be
considered whether further investigations need to be carried out and whether any action
concerning the marketing authorizations of products containing the same active
substance or the same combination of active substances, and their product information is
necessary.
The main objective of a PSUR is to present a comprehensive, concise and critical analysis
of the risk-benefit balance of the medicinal product taking into account new or emerging
information in the context of cumulative information on risks and benefits. The PSUR is
therefore a tool for post-authorization evaluation at defined time points in the lifecycle of
a product. For the purposes of lifecycle benefit-risk management, it is necessary to
continue evaluating the risks and benefits of a medicine in everyday medical practice and
long-term use in the post-authorization phase.
The scope, objectives, format and content of the PSUR are described in current GVP for
Arab countries. The required format and content of PSURs are based on those described in
the European Good Pharmacovigilance Practice as well as for the Periodic Benefit Risk
Evaluation Report (PBRER) described in the ICH-E2C (R2) guideline.
The PBRER format replaces the PSUR format previously described in the ICH-E2C (R1).
The primary objective of the PSUR was to provide a comprehensive picture of the safety of
approved medicinal products. With recognition that the assessment of the risk of a
medicinal product is most meaningful when considered in light of its benefits, the proposed
report would provide greater emphasis on benefit than the PSUR, particularly when risk
estimates change importantly. In such cases there will need to be an overall explicit
evaluation of benefit- risk. Consequently, the name of the proposed report is the “Periodic
Benefit -Risk Evaluation Report” (PBRER). The PBRER would also provide greater
emphasis on the cumulative knowledge regarding a medicinal product, while retaining a
focus on new information.
In Oman, the report shall be described / named and submitted as either PSUR or PBRER,
which is based on the EU/ICH guideline.
Within 90 calendar days of the data lock point (day 0) for PSURs covering
intervals in excess of 12 months; ad hoc PSURs should be submitted
within 90 calendar days of the data lock point.
The Module concerns of PASS are clinical trials or non-interventional studies and
does not address non-clinical safety studies. A PASS is non-interventional if the
following requirements are cumulatively fulfilled:
Non-interventional studies are defined by the methodological approach used and not by
its scientific objectives. Non-interventional studies include database research or review
of records where all the events of interest have already happened (this may include case-
control, cross-sectional, cohort or other study designs making secondary use of data).
Non-interventional studies also include those involving primary data collection (e.g.
19 Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices in Oman for MAHs/ Pharmaceutical
Companies| Department of Pharmacovigilance & Drug Information, DGPA & DC –MOH,
Oman
Version 1, 2017
prospective observational studies and registries in which the data collected derive from
routine clinical care), provided that the conditions set out above are met. In these studies,
interviews, questionnaires and blood samples may be performed as part of normal
clinical practice.
The signal management process can be defined as the set of activities performed to
determine whether, based on an examination of individual case safety reports (ICSRs),
aggregated data from active surveillance systems or studies, literature information or
other data sources, there are new risks associated with an active substance or a
medicinal product or whether known risks have changed.
The signal management process concerns all stakeholders involved in the safety
monitoring of medicinal products including patients, healthcare professionals, MAHs,
regulatory authorities, scientific committees. Whereas the ADRs database will be a major
source of pharmacovigilance information, the signal management process covers signals
arising from any source, only signals related to an adverse reaction shall be considered.
The signal management process covers all steps from detecting signals to recommending
action(s) as follows:
signal detection;
signal validation;
signal analysis and prioritization;
signal assessment;
recommendation for action;
exchange of information.
The primary target audiences for safety communication issued by regulatory authorities
and marketing authorisation holders should be patients and healthcare professionals
who use (i.e. prescribe, handle, dispense, administer or take) medicinal products.
Note:
Any safety update in any format, which need to be communicated to healthcare
professionals or public, the same text format, should be approved by DPV & DI before it is
communicated.
Are based on targeted communication with the aim to supplement the information in the
summary product characteristics (SmPC) and package leaflet. Any educational material
should focus on actionable goals and should provide clear and concise messages
describing actions to be taken in order to prevent and minimize selected safety concerns.
Should be fully aligned with the currently approved product information for a medicinal
product, such as the SmPC and package leaflet, and should add rather than duplicate
SmPC and package leaflet information. Promotional elements, either direct or veiled (e.g.
logos, product brand colours, suggestive images and pictures), should not be included
and the focus of the educational material should be on the risk(s) related to the product
and the management of those risk(s) requiring additional risk minimisation.
Educational tools
Should focus on clearly defined actions related to specific safety concerns described in
the RMP and should not be unnecessarily diluted by including information that is not
The aim of any educational tool targeting a healthcare professional should be to deliver
specific recommendation(s) on the use (what to do) and/or contraindication(s) (what not
to do) and/or warnings (how to manage adverse reactions) associated with the medicine
and the specific important risks needing additional risk minimisation measures, including:
selection of patients;
treatment management such as dosage, testing and monitoring;
special administration procedures, or the dispensing of a medicinal product;
Details of information that needs to be given to patients.
The format of a particular tool will depend upon the message to be delivered. For example,
where a number of actions are needed before writing a prescription for an individual
patient, a checklist may be the most suitable format. A brochure may be more appropriate
to enhance awareness of specific important risks with a focus on the early recognition and
management of adverse reactions, while posters for display in certain clinical
environments can include helpful treatment or dosage reference guides. Other formats may
be preferable, depending on the scope of the tool.
The aim of tools targeting patients should be to enhance the awareness of patients or their
carers on the early signs and symptoms of specific adverse reactions causing the need for
additional risk minimisation measures and on the best course of action to be taken should
any of those symptoms occur. If appropriate, a patient‘s educational tool could be used to
provide information on the correct administration of the product and to remind the patient
about an important activity, for example a diary for posology or diagnostic procedures that
need to be carried out and recorded by the patient and eventually discussed with
healthcare professionals, to ensure that any steps required for the effective use of the
product are adhered to.