CE 809 - Lecture 6 - Response of SDF Systems To General Dynamic Loading
CE 809 - Lecture 6 - Response of SDF Systems To General Dynamic Loading
2
Duhamel’s Integral
3
Duhamel’s Integral
𝑝(𝑡)
A general dynamic loading =
A series of short Impulses
0 𝑡
𝜏 The sum of these impulse
𝑝(𝜏) 𝑑𝜏
𝑑𝜏 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 (𝑡−𝜏) sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 − 𝜏 responses = the response to
𝑑𝑢(𝑡) 𝑚 𝜔𝐷 the dynamic loading
0 𝑡
4
Duhamel’s Integral
Let 𝑑𝑢 (𝑡; 𝜏) is the response of a linear dynamic system at time 𝑡 due to impulse 𝑝(𝜏) 𝑑𝜏 at
time 𝜏.
Where
𝑒 −𝜉𝜔 𝑡−𝜏
ℎ (𝑡 − 𝜏) = sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 − 𝜏 , 𝑡>𝜏 ………. (2)
𝑚 𝜔𝐷
0 , 𝑡≤𝜏
𝜏= 𝑡
𝑢(𝑡) = 𝑝 𝜏 . ℎ (𝑡 − 𝜏) 𝑑𝜏
𝜏= 0
AIT Share 6
Response to General Dynamic Loading - Duhamel’s Integral
By means of superposition the total responsive 𝑢(𝑡) can be obtained by summing all
impulse responses developed during the loading history.
𝜏= 𝑡
7
Response to General Dynamic Loading - Duhamel’s Integral
For other cases, additional free vibration response must be added to the solution:
𝑡
𝑢 (0) + 𝑢 (0) 𝜉 𝜔
𝑢 (𝑡) = 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 𝑡 sin(𝜔𝐷 𝑡) + 𝑢 (0) cos(𝜔𝐷 𝑡) + 𝑝 𝜏 ℎ (𝑡 − 𝜏) 𝑑𝜏 ….. (4)
𝜔𝐷
0
8
Response to General Dynamic Loading - Duhamel’s Integral
𝑡
1
𝑢 (𝑡) = 𝑝 𝜏 . 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 𝑡−𝜏
sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑚 𝜔𝐷
0
𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 𝑡 . 𝑒 𝜉 𝜔 𝜏 sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 cos(𝜔𝐷 𝜏) − cos(𝜔𝐷 𝑡) sin(𝜔𝐷 𝜏)
Therefore,
𝑡
1
𝑢 (𝑡) = 𝑝 𝜏 . 𝑒 −𝜉𝜔𝑡 𝑒 𝜉𝜔𝜏 sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 cos 𝜔𝐷 𝜏) − cos 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 sin 𝜔𝐷 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑚 𝜔𝐷
0
9
Response to General Dynamic Loading - Duhamel’s Integral
By rearranging the terms, we get
𝑡 𝑡
−𝜉𝜔𝑡 −𝜉𝜔𝑡
𝑒 𝜉𝜔𝜏
𝑒
𝑢 𝑡 = 𝑝 𝜏 .𝑒 cos 𝜔𝐷 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 sin 𝜔𝐷 𝑡 − 𝑝 𝜏 . 𝑒 𝜉𝜔𝜏 sin 𝜔𝐷 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 cos 𝜔𝐷 𝑡
𝑚 𝜔𝐷 𝑚 𝜔𝐷
0 0
Where 𝑡
𝑒 −𝜉𝜔𝑡
𝐴𝑡 = 𝑝 𝜏 . 𝑒 𝜉𝜔𝜏 . cos 𝜔𝐷 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑚 𝜔𝐷 0
𝑡
𝑒 −𝜉𝜔𝑡
𝐵𝑡 = 𝑝 𝜏 . 𝑒 𝜉𝜔𝜏 . sin 𝜔𝐷 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑚 𝜔𝐷 0
10
Response to General Dynamic Loading - Duhamel’s Integral
𝑡
1
𝐵𝑡 = 𝑝 𝜏 . sin(𝜔 𝜏) 𝑑𝜏
𝑚𝜔 0
The terms in parenthesis for (both damped and undamped cases) need “numerical integration”.
11
Numerical Integration
Simple Summation:
𝑡
𝑓 𝜏 𝑑 𝜏 ≅ Δ𝜏 𝑓0 + 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + 𝑓3 + ⋯ 𝑓𝑁−1
0
𝑓𝜏
Where 𝑓𝑖 = 𝑓(𝜏 = 𝑖. Δ𝜏) , and Δ𝜏 = 𝑡/𝑁
𝜏
𝑡
Δ𝜏
12
Numerical Integration
Trapezoidal Rule:
𝑡
Δ𝜏
𝑓 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 ≅ 𝑓0 + 2𝑓1 + 2𝑓2 + 2𝑓3 + ⋯ 2𝑓𝑁−1 + 𝑓𝑁
0 2
13
Solving Duhamel’s Integral using Numerical Integration
14
Solving Duhamel’s Integral using Numerical Integration
Undamped Systems
Simple summation:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝑦0 + 𝑦1 + 𝑦2 + ⋯ + 𝑦𝑁−1
𝑚𝜔
Trapezoidal rule:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = [𝑦0 + 2𝑦1 + 2𝑦2 + ⋯ + 2𝑦𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁 ]
2𝑚𝜔
Simpson’s rule:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = [𝑦0 + 4𝑦1 + 2𝑦2 + ⋯ + 4𝑦𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁 ]
3𝑚𝜔
Source: Clough and Penzien (2003) 15
It is more efficient to write these equations in their recursive forms:
Simple summation:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦 𝑁 = 1, 2, 3, …
𝑚 𝜔 𝑁−1
Trapezoidal rule:
Δ𝜏 𝑁 = 1, 2, 3, …
𝐴𝑁 = 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁
2𝑚𝜔
Simpson’s rule:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁−2 + 4𝑦𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁 𝑁 = 2, 4, 6, …
3𝑚𝜔
Such that 𝐴0 =0
16
Source: Clough and Penzien (2003)
Solving Duhamel’s Integral using Numerical Integration
Damped Systems
Simple summation:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁−1 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 𝑁 = 1, 2, 3, …
𝑚 𝜔𝐷
Trapezoidal rule:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁−1 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 + 𝑦𝑁 𝑁 = 1, 2, 3, …
2 𝑚 𝜔𝐷
Simpson’s rule:
Δ𝜏
𝐴𝑁 = 𝑒 −2 𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 𝐴𝑁−1 + 𝑦𝑁−2 𝑒 −2 𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 + 4 𝑦𝑁−1 𝑒 −𝜉 𝜔 Δ𝜏 + 𝑦𝑁 𝑁 = 2, 4, 6, …
3 𝑚 𝜔𝐷
17
Solving Duhamel’s Integral using Numerical Integration
• The evaluation of 𝐵 𝑡 can be carried out in the same manner, however, in doing so, the
definition of 𝑦 𝜏 must be changed to 𝑦 𝜏 = 𝑝 𝜏 sin(𝜔𝜏).
18
Numerical Example
Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)
The unit of force is kips.
1.0 kip = 1000 lbs
A water tower subjected to blast load The unit of stiffness is the unit of force
divided by the unit of displacement.
Kip/ft
19
Numerical Example
Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)
20
21
Numerical Example
Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)
22
Duhamel’s Integral
• The concept of convolution integral will be used again later when we study the response
of structures to random loadings from statistical view point (random vibration theory).
23
Applications
Evaluation of Structural Response to Earthquake Ground Motions
𝑑 2 𝑢(𝑡)
𝑡 𝑑𝑢 (𝑡)
𝑡 𝑑 2 𝑢𝑔(𝑡)
𝑡
𝑚 +𝑐 + 𝑘 𝑢 𝑡 = −𝑚
(𝑡)
𝑑𝑡 2 𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡 2
𝑚
𝑢𝑔(𝑡)
(𝑡)
𝑢𝑔(𝑡)
(𝑡)
24
Applications
26
Step-by-step Direct Integration Method
27
𝑢
𝑓𝑠 𝑓𝑠
𝑓𝑠 Linear
Elastic
Column
𝑓𝑠 = 𝑘 𝑢
𝑢 𝑢
𝑓𝑠 Steel Column
RC Column Elasto-plastic
28
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
Consider the dynamic equilibrium (in scalar form) of a nonlinear structure at time 𝑡 :
𝑓𝐼 𝑡 + 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 + 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑝 𝑡 ………. (1)
Where
𝑓𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑚 𝑢 𝑡 𝑝 𝑡 is an arbitrary/general
𝑓𝐷 𝑡 ≠ 𝑐𝑢 𝑡 loading.
𝑝𝑡
Damping force may not be a linear function of velocity 𝑢 𝑡 .
𝑓𝑠 𝑡 ≠ 𝑘 𝑢 𝑡
𝑡
Restoring force is a nonlinear function of displacement 𝑢 𝑡 .
29
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
𝑓𝐼 𝑡 + 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 + 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑝𝑡 ………. (1)
𝑓𝐼 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 + 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 + 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 = 𝑝 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 ………. (2)
Where Δ𝑓𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑓𝐼 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 − 𝑓𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑚 Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑓𝐷
Δ𝑓𝐷 𝑡 = 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 − 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 ≅ . Δ𝑢 𝑡 = 𝑐 𝑡 . Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑓𝑠
Δ𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 − 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 ≅ . Δ𝑢 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑡 . Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑢 𝑡 30
𝑝 𝑡 + ∆𝑡
𝑝𝑡 Δ𝑝 𝑡 = 𝑝 (𝑡 + Δ𝑡) − 𝑝 𝑡
Time
𝑓𝑠 𝑡 𝑡 + Δ𝑡
Slope
𝑑𝑓𝑠
𝑓𝑠 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 Δ𝑓𝑠 𝑡 =
𝑑𝑢 𝑡
Δ𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 − 𝑓𝑠 𝑡
=𝑘𝑡
𝑓𝑠 𝑡 𝑑𝑓𝑠
Δ𝑢 𝑡 ≅ . Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑢 𝑡
≅ 𝑘 𝑡 . Δ𝑢
𝑢
𝑢𝑡 𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑡
31
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
Δ𝑓𝐷 𝑡 = 𝑐 𝑡 . Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑓𝑠
=
𝑑𝑢 𝑡
Δ𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑡 . Δ𝑢 𝑡
32
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
𝑚 Δ𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑐 𝑡 Δ𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑘 𝑡 Δ𝑢 𝑡 = Δ𝑝 𝑡 ………. (4)
Introducing an assumption that “the acceleration response varies linearly during each
time increment”.
This yields quadratic and cubic variations of velocity and displacement, respectively.
33
𝑢 𝑡 + Δ𝑢 𝑡
𝑢𝑡 “the acceleration response
Δ𝑢 𝑡
∆𝑡 𝑢 𝜏 =𝑢 𝑡 + .𝜏 varies linearly during each ………. (5)
∆𝑡 time increment”.
𝑡 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 𝜏
𝜏 𝑢 𝜏 =𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑢 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑢 𝑡 0
………. (6)
𝑢𝑡 Δ𝑢 𝑡 𝜏 2
𝑢 𝜏 = 𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑢 𝑡 .𝜏 + .
∆𝑡 2
∆𝑢 𝜏
𝜏
𝑢𝜏 =𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑢 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑢 𝑡 0
𝑢 𝑡 𝜏 2 Δ𝑢 𝑡 𝜏 3 (7)
𝑢 𝜏 = 𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑢 𝑡 .𝜏 + 𝑢 𝑡 . + .
2 ∆𝑡 6
34
∆𝑢 𝜏
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
At 𝜏 = ∆𝑡, the above equations for velocity and displacement becomes,
Δ𝑢 𝑡 ∆𝑡 2 ………. (8)
∆𝑢 𝑡 = 𝑢 𝑡 . ∆𝑡 + .
∆𝑡 2
∆𝑡 2 Δ𝑢 𝑡 ∆𝑡 3
∆𝑢 𝑡 = 𝑢 𝑡 . ∆𝑡 + 𝑢 𝑡 . + . ………. (9)
2 ∆𝑡 6
6 6 ………. (10)
∆𝑢 𝑡 = 2 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 − . 𝑢 𝑡 − 3 𝑢 𝑡
∆𝑡 ∆𝑡
3 ∆𝑡
Δ𝑢 𝑡 = . ∆𝑢 𝑡 − 3 𝑢 𝑡 − . 𝑢 𝑡 ………. (11)
∆𝑡 2
Equations (10) and (11) are derived from the “linear acceleration assumption”.
35
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
Introducing Equations (10) and (11) into the incremental form of governing equation of
motion (Equation (4)), we obtain
6 6 3 ∆𝑡
𝑚 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 − . 𝑢 𝑡 − 3 𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑐 𝑡 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 − 3 𝑢 𝑡 − . 𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑘 𝑡 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 = ∆𝑝 𝑡
∆𝑡 2 ∆𝑡 ∆𝑡 2
𝑘 𝑡 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 = ∆ 𝑝 𝑡 ………. (12)
Where
6 3
𝑘 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑡 + 2.𝑚 + .𝑐 𝑡
∆𝑡 ∆𝑡
6 ∆𝑡
∆𝑝 𝑡 = ∆𝑝 𝑡 + 𝑚 .𝑢 𝑡 + 3 𝑢 𝑡 +𝑐 𝑡 3 𝑢 𝑡 + .𝑢 𝑡
∆𝑡 2
36
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
𝑘 𝑡 . ∆𝑢 𝑡 = ∆ 𝑝 𝑡 ………. (12)
Where
6 3
𝑘 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑡 + 2.𝑚 + .𝑐 𝑡
∆𝑡 ∆𝑡
6 ∆𝑡
∆𝑝 𝑡 = ∆𝑝 𝑡 + 𝑚 .𝑢 𝑡 + 3 𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑐 𝑡 3 𝑢 𝑡 + .𝑢 𝑡
∆𝑡 2
Let’s assume that the calculation is made up to Time = 𝑡 and we are going to proceed to the
next time stop, 𝑡 + ∆𝑡.
∆𝑢 𝑡 can be determined. ∆𝑢 𝑡 and ∆𝑢 𝑡 can be derived from ∆𝑢 𝑡 by Eqs (11) and (10).
37
Step-by-step Integration Procedure
Note:
Two assumptions are used in this step-by-step calculation.
These assumptions are justified only when Δ𝑡 is sufficiently small, small Δ𝑡 small error.
Although the error in each step is small, the error can accumulate and becomes significant
when the number of steps is large.
The accumulation should be avoided by imposing the dynamic equilibrium condition at each
time step.
38
Time = 𝒕 𝑢(𝑡) and 𝑢(𝑡) are known Calculation
flow chart
Evaluate 𝑑𝑓𝑠 𝑑𝑓𝐷 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 = 𝑓𝑠 𝑢(𝑡)
𝑘 𝑡 = , 𝑐 𝑡 = ,
𝑑𝑢 𝑡
𝑑𝑢 𝑡 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 = 𝑓𝐷 𝑢(𝑡)
Impose dynamic 1
𝑢 𝑡 = . 𝑝 𝑡 − 𝑓𝐷 𝑡 − 𝑓𝑠 𝑡 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (1)
equilibrium condition 𝑚
6 3
𝑘 𝑡 =𝑘 𝑡 + . 𝑚 + .𝑐 𝑡
∆𝑡 2 ∆𝑡
6 ∆𝑡
∆𝑝 𝑡 = ∆𝑝 𝑡 + 𝑚 .𝑢 𝑡 + 3𝑢 𝑡 + 𝑐 𝑡 3 𝑢 𝑡 + .𝑢 𝑡
∆𝑡 2
∆𝑢 𝑡 = ∆𝑝 𝑡 /𝑘 𝑡 Equation (12)
3 ∆𝑡
∆𝑢 𝑡 = ∆𝑢 𝑡 − 3𝑢 𝑡 − 𝑢 𝑡 Equation (11)
∆𝑡 2
𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 = 𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑢 𝑡
Time = 𝒕 + ∆𝒕
𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 = 𝑢 𝑡 + ∆𝑢 𝑡 39
Additional Notes
1. Response of any SDF system with any prescribed nonlinear properties can be evaluated
by “step-by-step integration”.
2. Response of any linear SDF system can also be evaluated by the step-by-step
integration.
40
Additional Notes
The choice of Δ𝑡 also depends on the nonlinear properties of damping and stiffness
My suggestion:
Δ𝑡/𝑇 ≤ 1/30 𝑢
4. The step-by-step integration technique will be extended for the calculation of responses
of nonlinear MDF systems later.
More attention will be paid on the accumulation of error – as it is a major factor in the
determination of Δ𝑡.
41
Numerical Example
Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)
𝑢(𝑡)
An elastoplastic frame
and dynamic loading
42
Numerical Example Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)
43
Numerical Example Taken from Clough and Penzien (2003)