Application Report

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Ultrasonic Sensing Basics

Mubina Toa, Akeem Whitehead

ABSTRACT
Ultrasonic sensors use sound waves above the 20 kHz range to detect objects in proximity, similar to how
bats use echolocation to maneuver without colliding into obstacles. In the automotive space, ultrasonic
sensors are prevalent for ADAS (Advanced Driver-Assistant Systems) applications, specifically for parking
assist where 4–16 sensors are used to detect obstacles when parking a vehicle. In the industrial space,
ultrasonic sensors are used in robotics and other applications that require reliable presence, proximity, or
position sensing. This application report discusses what ultrasonic time-of-flight sensing is, as well as
system considerations and what additional factors affect ultrasonic sensing.

Contents
1 What is Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Sensing? .............................................................................. 1
1.1 Principles of Ultrasound ............................................................................................ 2
1.2 Why Use Ultrasonic Sensing? .................................................................................... 2
1.3 How Does Ultrasound Compare to Other Sensing Technologies? .......................................... 3
1.4 Typical Ultrasonic-Sensing Applications ......................................................................... 3
2 Ultrasonic System Considerations ......................................................................................... 4
2.1 Introduction to the Ultrasonic System ............................................................................ 5
2.2 The Ultrasonic Echo and Signal Processing .................................................................... 5
2.3 Transducer Types .................................................................................................. 7
2.4 Transducer Topologies ............................................................................................. 8
2.5 Transducer Frequencies ........................................................................................... 8
2.6 Transducer Drive (Transformer Drive & Direct Drive) and Current Limit .................................... 9
2.7 Pulse Count.......................................................................................................... 9
2.8 Minimum Detection Range ....................................................................................... 10
3 What Factors Influence Ultrasonic Sensing? ........................................................................... 10
3.1 Transmission Medium ............................................................................................ 10
3.2 Acoustic Impedance .............................................................................................. 10
3.3 Radar Cross Section .............................................................................................. 12
3.4 Ambient Conditions (Temperature, Humidity, Debris) ........................................................ 12
4 Device Selection ............................................................................................................ 12
5 Additional Resources ...................................................................................................... 13
Trademarks
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

1 What is Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Sensing?

This section discusses the physics of sound waves and the benefits of using ultrasonic sensors in a
variety of applications.

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 1

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
What is Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Sensing? www.ti.com

1.1 Principles of Ultrasound

Ultrasonic sensors can measure distance and detect the presence of an object without making physical
contact. They do so by producing and monitoring an ultrasonic echo. Depending on the sensor and object
properties, the effective range in air is between a few centimeters up to several meters. The ultrasonic
sensor (or transducer) generates and emits ultrasonic pulses that are reflected back towards the sensor
by an object that is within the field of view of the sensor.

Figure 1. Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Measurement

The ultrasonic sensor is a piezoelectric transducer, which is able to convert an electrical signal into
mechanical vibrations, and mechanical vibrations into an electrical signal. Therefore, in a monostatic
approach, the ultrasonic sensor is a transceiver which operates as both a speaker and microphone at a
single frequency.
The sensor is able to capture the difference in time between the emitted and received echo. Because the
speed of sound is a known variable, the captured round-trip time can be used to calculate the distance
between the sensor and object. Equation 1 shows the Ultrasonic Distance Calculation.
tRoundTrip u VSound
dOneWay
2 (1)
This method of ultrasonic sensing is a time-of-flight measurement based on the propagation time of
sound. Note that the velocity of sound through air varies by temperature. In dry air at 20°C (68°F), the
speed of sound is 343 m/s, or a kilometer in 2.91 s. For more information on the relationship between the
velocity of sound and temperature, see Section 3.4.

1.2 Why Use Ultrasonic Sensing?

Ultrasonic sensors can detect a variety of materials, regardless of shape, transparency, or color. The only
requirement for ultrasonic sensing is that the target material is a solid or liquid. This enables contactless
detection of:
• Metal
• Plastic
• Glass
• Wood
• Rocks
• Sand
• Oil
• Water
• Other hard, non-sound absorbent materials
These materials are able to reflect sound back towards the sensor through the air. Certain objects can be
more difficult to detect, like angled surfaces that direct the echo away from the sensor, or permeable
targets like sponge, foam, and soft clothing. These absorb more reflected ultrasonic energy.

2 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com What is Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Sensing?

1.3 How Does Ultrasound Compare to Other Sensing Technologies?

Infrared (IR) sensors can be used for obstacle detection because of their high resolution, low cost, and
fast response times. However, IR sensors require knowledge of the surface properties prior to
implementation due to their non-linear characteristics and dependence on reflectance properties. Various
surface materials reflect and absorb IR energy differently, so target material identification is required for
accurate distance measurements.
Optical-based sensing technologies have a similar principle to ultrasonic technology. Instead of using
sound waves, however, optical technology uses LEDs to emit light waves and detect the time-of-flight,
which can then convert based on the speed of light principle. The speed of light is much faster than the
speed of sound, therefore optical-based sensing is faster than ultrasonic. It does have limitations in bright
ambient lighting conditions and smoky or foggy environments, however, as these environments make it
difficult for the light receptor to detect the emitted light. Optical sensing also has limitations in detecting
clear materials like glass or water. Light passes through these materials, whereas ultrasonic bounces off.
Radar and LIDAR-based technologies aim to provide a multi-point array of data, instead of a single time-
of-flight measurement. This allows for highly accurate data points and the ability to map out and
distinguish tiny moments within the environment. However, the increased functionality makes these
systems much more expensive than the other solutions mentioned previously.
Table 1 summarizes differences between PIR, ultrasonic, optical ToF, and mmWave.

Table 1. Proximity Sensing Technology Comparison

Passive Infrared Ultrasonic Optical ToF mmWave
Detection Range 0.1 to 5 m 0.1 to 10 m 0.01 to 20 m 0.01 to 100+ m
Resolution Few cm Few mm Few mm Few mm
(transducer dependent) (optics dependent) (range dependent)
Field of View Up to 180° 5° to 120° 0.15° to 120° 5° to 160°
Current Consumption <5 mA 72 mW to 336 mW 100 μW to 200 mW 0.5 W to 1.5 W
(active) (active)
2-9 mW (standby/sleep) ~ 80 μW (standby/sleep)
Solution / Module Size Medium Medium Small Large
Aesthetics Requires lens to achieve Exposure to medium for Hidden behind dark Penetrates most
range and wide field of longer range glass materials (not metal)
view
Measuring Medium Infrared light (emitted by Sound Light Light
Speed object)
Single Sensor System < $1 $1 - $3 $1.5 - $4 $18 - $26
Cost (US$)
Key Differentiation • Limited • Effectively detect • Target localization • Provides range,
performance in solid and (up to 3 zones of velocity, and angle
high heat transparent glass detection) data
environments and surfaces • Precise long-range • Can penetrate non-
corner regions • Able to detect measurements metal materials
• Insensitive to slow objects in a • Intelligent object
motion smoke/gas-filled differentiation
• Prone to false environment
positives

To view TI's full proximity sensing table, refer to TI’s proximity sensing technology infographic.

1.4 Typical Ultrasonic-Sensing Applications

There are three types of ultrasonic-sensing applications:
• Ranging Measurement: Periodically records the distance of one or more objects moving to or from
the sensor within each time-of-flight transaction. The rate at which the distance updates is dependent
on how long the sensor waits in the echo-listen mode. The longer the sensor waits for the echo, the
further the detectable range.
Examples: Ultrasonic park assist sensors, obstacle avoidance sensors in robotics, level transmitters

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 3

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Ultrasonic System Considerations www.ti.com

Further reading: Ultrasonic Terrain-Type and Obstacle Detection for Robotic Lawn Mowers tech note
(SLAA910).
• Proximity Detection: A significant change to the ultrasonic echo signature corresponds to a physical
change to the sensing environment. This binary approach of ultrasonic sensing is less dependent on
range, and more dependent on echo signature stability.
Examples: Cliff and edge detection in robots, object detection, vehicle detection in parking space,
security, and surveillance systems
Further reading: Using Ultrasonic Technology for Smart Parking and Garage Gate Systems tech note
(SLAA911).

Figure 2. Echo Response for Vehicle Presence

• Surface Type Detection: Using raw ultrasonic echo data, and not the time-of-flight measurement,
material softness and hardness can be indirectly measured with ultrasonic measurements. Ultrasonic
sound waves bounce off harder surfaces towards the transducer with fewer losses, which provides a
stronger echo response in return. Softer objects, like foam and carpet, absorb many of the sound
waves and provide a weaker echo response.
Examples: Floor type detection in vacuum robots, terrain type detection in robotic lawn mowers
Further reading: Ultrasonic Floor-Type and Cliff Detection on Automated Vacuum Robots tech note
(SLAA909).

Figure 3. Ultrasonic Surface Type Detection

2 Ultrasonic System Considerations

The ultrasonic system consists of the:
• Transducers or ultrasonic sensors
• Analog Front End (AFE) to drive the transmitter and condition the received signal
• Analog-to-digital converter (ADC)
• Additional signal processing capabilities to add intelligence to the measured data

4 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Ultrasonic System Considerations

The analog front end portion is responsible for driving the transducer, as well as amplifying and filtering
the received echo data to make it ready for further processing. Signal processing is either fully done by
the control unit in discrete and AFE solutions, or shared between the control unit and the integrated DSP
in the ASSP solution with its in-chip intelligence.

2.1 Introduction to the Ultrasonic System

Figure 4. Ultrasonic System Level Block Diagram

Ultrasonic systems can:

• Be fully discrete (composed of amplifiers, filters, diodes, and other passive components)
• Be an integrated AFE
• Be an Application Specific Standardized Part (ASSP) with some signal processing capabilities on chip
• Be fully integrated with an MCU on-chip
Note that transducer selection is a key factor in the overall performance of the ultrasonic module. The rest
of this section discusses how to choose a transducer based on its type, topology, and frequency, as well
as what optimization techniques can be used to achieve better performance.
For TI's list of recommended transducers compatible with TI ultrasonic devices, download the PGA460
Transformer and Transducer Listings zip file.

2.2 The Ultrasonic Echo and Signal Processing

TI recommends to drive transducers with a sine or square wave at their center frequency to achieve the
best results. Most integrated solutions have an output driver consisting of low-side drivers to drive a
transformer in a transformer-drive situation, or FETs in an h-bridge configuration for a direct drive solution.
After the transducer sends out an echo at its resonant frequency, the system must then listen for return
echoes which are a result of an object in the transducer's field of view. Ultrasonic systems typically filter
the return echo to remove noise and gain the signal up before it goes to an ADC. Some ways to gain the
ultrasonic system are as follows:
• Digital Gain / Fixed Gain: apply a fixed gain to the entire ultrasonic echo.
• Time-Varying-Gain: apply a gain that is dependent on how far out an object is. Often, objects that are
further out in time produce a weaker echo response and objects that are closer produce a stronger
echo response. To combat this, to prevent saturation of the close signals, and to be able to identify the
further objects, one may choose to gain their system such that a small gain is applied early in time,
and a larger gain is applied further out in time. This gives the user flexibility to configure their gain
SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 5
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Ultrasonic System Considerations www.ti.com

based on their system requirements.

• Automatic Gain Control / Logarithmic Amplifier: a logarithmic amplifier approach is a way to
achieve automatic gain control when dealing with input signals that are both high and low in amplitude.
A log amp gains an input signal based on the log scale which helps get a stronger echo response from
weak signals while also appropriately gaining the strong signals but preventing saturation, similar to the
time-varying-gain approach. Whereas the time-varying-gain method is dependent on where an object is
in time, the logarithmic amplifier is dependent on the actual echo of the input signal itself with no
dependency on time.
Designers can check the zero-crossing frequency data to verify that the return echo is that of the
transducer. This can also be used to detect doppler-shifts, which is the change in frequency of the emitted
sound wave, to detect motion and its direction.
Once the return signal has been filtered and gained appropriately, the data can be sent to the ADC for
further signal processing. Figure 5 shows the signal from the ADC output.

Figure 5. Typical Output From ADC

After the signal is digitized, it is ready to go to a digital signal processor (DSP) or an MCU for further
processing. First, it goes through a bandpass filter to reduce any out-of-band noise.

Figure 6. Typical Output From Bandpass Filter

6 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Ultrasonic System Considerations

The next stage is to rectify the signal to extract the absolute value of the signal as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7. Typical Output From Rectifier

After rectification, there is often a peak hold in place before a low-pass filter is applied to ensure the peak
amplitude of the rectified signal is not filtered out. Together with the peak hold and low-pass filter, a
demodulated output can be produced as shown in Figure 8. This makes it easy to apply thresholds to
further customize the signal to eliminate noise and extract time-of-flight data and echo width and
amplitude information. The demodulated signal is also referred to as an envelope signal.

Figure 8. Typical Output From Low-Pass Filter

2.3 Transducer Types

Transducers come in two types: closed-top and open-top. Although open-top transducers are lower cost,
and require a smaller driving voltage to achieve maximum Sound Pressure Level (SPL), they are
unreliable in harsh environments. Exposure to rain, dust, and other contaminants will damage the sensor.

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 7

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Ultrasonic System Considerations www.ti.com

Figure 9. Closed-Top and Open-Top Transducers (From PGA460EVM)

2.4 Transducer Topologies

Two transducer topologies are available: monostatic or bistatic. Topology must be based on the short
range requirement.
Monostatic topology is when a single transducer both transmits an echo and listens for returning echoes.
This is the lower-cost method preferred in most applications. The drawback of the monostatic transducer
topology is that the excitation ringing-decay of the sensor creates a blind zone that limits the minimum
detection range. In a monostatic configuration, this blind zone can be reduced by adding a damping
resistor. More information can be found in Section 2.6.
To eliminate this ringing decay, a bistatic topology must be used where there are two separate
transducers — one for transmitting and one for receiving. The drawback to using the bistatic approach is
that additional calibration required, as the designer must consider the angle of the incoming echo at the
receiver when computing the time-of-flight calculation.

Figure 10. Monostatic vs Bistatic Configuration

2.5 Transducer Frequencies

Ultrasonic transducers operate at frequencies in the range of 30–500 kHz for air-coupled applications. As
the ultrasonic frequency increases, the rate of attenuation increases. Thus, low-frequency sensors (30–80
kHz) are more effective for long range, while high-frequency sensors are more effective for short range.
Higher frequency sensors (80–500 kHz) also reduce the ringing-decay, which allows for a shorter
minimum detection range. For liquid level sensing, transducers in the 1-MHz range are often used. For
more information on liquid level sensing using ultrasonic technology, read Ultrasonic Sensing Basics for
Liquid Level Sensing application report (SNAA220).

8 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Ultrasonic System Considerations

Figure 11. Correlation of Distance Measured and Frequency

The relationship between frequency, resolution, directivity, attenuation, and distance can be observed with
the following relation:
↑ Frequency :: ↑ Resolution :: ↑ Narrower Directivity :: ↑ Attenuation :: ↓ Distance
Transducers can have narrow (15°) to wide field of views (180°). The higher the frequency, the narrower
the field of view. A narrow field of view using a low-frequency transducer can also be achieved by adding
a "horn" around the transducer to direct its echoes into a more narrow pattern.

2.6 Transducer Drive (Transformer Drive & Direct Drive) and Current Limit
There are two ways to drive a transducer: in transformer mode or in direct drive mode. This is determined
based on the maximum drive voltage (thus a higher current limit) of the selected transducer. Although
direct drive is the lower-cost driving technique, it is typically intended for short range, open-top
applications. Transformer drive maximizes closed-top transducer requirements (beyond 100 Vpp), but it
also requires additional calibration at mass production. Figure 12 shows the non-linear relationship
between transducer (XDCR) drive voltage, and the percent of the sound pressure level that is transmitted.
Note that blindspot lengths increase with higher current limits.

Figure 12. SPL Across Driving Voltage

2.7 Pulse Count

Pulse count is another parameter in the ultrasonic-sensing system. It is defined by the number of pulses
emitted by the transducer. The larger the pulse count, the larger the SPL will be, but the minimum
detection range will be less optimal as the transducer is bursting for a longer period of time.

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 9

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Ultrasonic System Considerations www.ti.com

2.8 Minimum Detection Range

The minimum detection range of ultrasonic systems is determined by the properties of the transducer itself
and the way it is pulsed. The blindspot, or transducer ringing-decay time, is caused by the resonant
energy oscillating at the base of the transducer in a monostatic configuration (that is, one that both
transmits and receives). Higher frequency transducers have smaller ringing-decay times, thus reducing the
minimum range. Using this approach, however, will reduce the sensing range. Using a bistatic approach
can eliminate this ringing behavior, as this setup isolates the sending and receiving transducers, but it will
be double the cost of a monostatic solution.
Another way to reduce the blindspot is by lowering the pulse count and lowering the current limit. This
may reduce the strength of the echo that is returned, however.
If a low-frequency, monostatic setup must be used, and if lowering the pulse count and current limit
decrease the integrity of the received echo, additional passive components may be introduced to reduce
the blindspot. A damping resistor in the range of 500 Ω to 25 kΩ may be added in parallel to the
transducer to reduce the ringing-decay time.
For more information on how to optimize the ultrasonic setup, see the PGA460 Ultrasonic Module
Hardware and Software Optimization application report (SLAA732).

3 What Factors Influence Ultrasonic Sensing?

Sound waves at a frequency of 20 kHz or greater are referred to as ultrasonic because this frequency
range is inaudible to humans.

3.1 Transmission Medium

Transmission properties, and the speed of sound, change across different mediums. An ultrasonic sensor
is optimized for sound wave propagation through air, liquids, or solids, but rarely for more than one type of
transmission medium. Ultrasonic attenuation in the air increases as a function of frequency, so air-coupled
ultrasonic applications are limited to frequencies below 500 kHz. Liquid and solid applications can use
transducers in the low MHz range for high-accuracy applications.

Figure 13. Speed of Sound Through Different Media

3.2 Acoustic Impedance

Sound waves can travel through various types of medium to detect objects with significant acoustic
impedance mismatch. Acoustic impedance (Z) is defined as a product of density and acoustic velocity. Air
has much lower acoustic impedance compared to most liquids or solids.

10 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com What Factors Influence Ultrasonic Sensing?

Table 2. Acoustic Impedances of Target Materials

Material Density Acoustic Velocity Acoustic Impedance
3 1
kgm ms kgm 2 s 1
u 106
(2) (3) (4)
Air 1.3 330 .00429
Water 1000 1450 1.45
Muscle 1075 1590 1.70
Aluminum 2700 6320 17.1
Iron 7700 5900 45.43
Steel 7800 5900 46.02
Gold 19320 3240 62.6
Skin 1109 1540 1.6

The difference in acoustic impedance (Z) between two objects is defined as impedance mismatch (see
Equation 5). The greater the impedance mismatch, the greater percentage of energy is reflected at the
boundary between the two mediums.
2
§ Z2 Z1 ·
Reflection Coefficient R ¨ ¸
© Z2 Z1 ¹ (5)
Example 1: Air and skin:

Figure 14. Reflection Coefficients for Skin and Air Boundaries

The acoustic impedance of air is .00429 and the acoustic impedance of skin is 1.6. Putting these values in
the reflection coefficient yields Equation 6:
2 2
§ ZSkin Z Air · § 1.6 0.00429 ·
¨ ¸ ¨1.6 0.99
© ZSkin Z Air ¹ © 0.00429 ¸¹ (6)
Performing this calculation at every boundary dictates how much energy is reflected back, how much is
absorbed within the material, and how much is permeated through.
Example 2: Water and steel:

Figure 15. Reflection Coefficients for Water and Steel Boundaries

Similarly, for liquid-based detection, a water and steel boundary reflects back 88% of the transmitted echo
using the same equation (Equation 6).

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 11

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
What Factors Influence Ultrasonic Sensing? www.ti.com

3.3 Radar Cross Section

Radar cross section is how well a target is able to reflect ultrasonic waves back to the transducer. Curved
objects or tilted objects may scatter the majority of ultrasonic waves transmitted towards the object, which
provides a weak echo response. Surfaces that yield the strongest echo response when facing the sensor
are:
• Large
• Dense
• Flat
• Smooth
Objects that meet these criteria, like a wall or floor, yield the best responses. Small objects, or objects that
partially deflect sound (like people, animals, or plants), will reduce the sensing response. A flat object
should face the sensor at a 90° angle, when possible, to maximize sensing response. Round or rigid
surfaces enable larger angular deviations. Figure 16 shows the reflected ultrasonic wave from the surface
of a target based on the target's shape.

Figure 16. Ultrasonic Echoes Based on Target Shape

Equation 7 defines the radar cross section of a target (σ):

V Projected cross section u Reflectivity u Directivity (7)

3.4 Ambient Conditions (Temperature, Humidity, Debris)

The velocity of an air-coupled ultrasonic echo is influenced by external environmental parameters, such as
temperature, humidity, and in-band ambient noise. The sensing range decreases as either temperature
increases. Although the sensing rate also decreases as humidity increases, this can often be neglected,
as the effects are minimal. The rate of attenuation across temperature and humidity is non-linear.
m § m ·
VSound 331 0.6 u Temperature °C ¸
s ¨© s°C ¹ (8)
Airborne debris such as dust, rain, or snow can weaken the ultrasonic energy and alter the field-of-view of
the sensor. The performance of a closed-face transducer is not affected by minor dust or dirt deposits.
However, if the sensor is partially submerged in water, or covered in mud, snow, or ice, ranging
performance will diminish.

4 Device Selection
It is important to choose an ultrasonic solution based on the system where it will reside. Table 3 shows
TI's ultrasonic-sensing products:

Table 3. Device Selection

TDC1011 / TDC1000 TUSS4470 TUSS4440 PGA460
Device type Analog front-end Analog front-end Analog front-end Analog front-end +
digital signal processor
(integrated)
Supported transducer 31.25 kHz – 4 MHz 40 kHz – 1 MHz 40 – 400 kHz 30 – 80 kHz & 180 –
frequencies 480 kHz
40 – 440 kHz (pre-drive)

12 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Additional Resources

Table 3. Device Selection (continued)

TDC1011 / TDC1000 TUSS4470 TUSS4440 PGA460
Channel count TDC1011: 1 Channel 1 Channel 1 Channel 1 Channel
TDC1000: 2 Channel
Drive topology Direct drive (max 5V) - Direct drive (max 36 V) Transformer drive - Transformer drive
- Pre-drive - Direct drive with added
FETs
Gain stage Fixed gain (20 to 41 dB) 86 dB logarithmic 86 dB logarithmic 6 point time-varying gain
amplifier amplifier (32 to 90 dB)
Outputs - Zero crossing - Analog echo envelope - Analog echo envelope - DSP processed output
- Echo start and stop - Zero crossing - Zero crossing (time-of-flight, amplitude,
pulse width)
- Envelope threshold - Envelope threshold
detect detect - Echo data dump
(down-sampled echo
envelope)
- Raw digital data path
(ADC, bandpass filter,
rectifier, lowpass filter)
Temperature sensor Interface to RTD No No On-chip temperature
sensor
Diagnostics None SPI diagnostics SPI diagnostics - System diagnostics
(frequency, decay,
excitation voltage)
- Supply diagnostics
(overvoltage)
Automotive qualified TDC1011-Q1 N/A N/A PGA460-Q1
device
TDC1000-Q1
Output interface SPI - SPI for programming - SPI for programming - USART (UART + SPI)
- Analog output - Analog output - OWU
- TCI

For more information, visit ti.com/ultrasonic.

5 Additional Resources
• BOOSTXL-PGA460 product page
• Texas Instruments, Ultrasonic Sensing with the PGA460-Q1 training video
• Texas Instruments, PGA460 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) and EVM Troubleshooting Guide
application report (SLAA733)
• Texas Instruments, PGA460 Ultrasonic Module Hardware and Software Optimization application report
(SLAA732)
• Texas Instruments, PGA460 Transformer and Transducer Listings zip file (SLAC787)

SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020 Ultrasonic Sensing Basics 13

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Revision History www.ti.com

Revision History
NOTE: Page numbers for previous revisions may differ from page numbers in the current version.

Changes from B Revision (January 2020) to C Revision ............................................................................................... Page

• Changed the Ultrasonic System Level Block Diagram ............................................................................... 5

Changes from A Revision (October 2019) to B Revision ............................................................................................... Page

• Changed Table 3 ........................................................................................................................ 12

Changes from Original (September 2019) to A Revision ............................................................................................... Page

• Changed the Ultrasonic System Level Block Diagram ............................................................................... 5

14 Revision History SLAA907C – September 2019 – Revised March 2020

Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019–2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated
 IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

TI PROVIDES TECHNICAL AND RELIABILITY DATA (INCLUDING DATASHEETS), DESIGN RESOURCES (INCLUDING REFERENCE
DESIGNS), APPLICATION OR OTHER DESIGN ADVICE, WEB TOOLS, SAFETY INFORMATION, AND OTHER RESOURCES “AS IS”
AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD
PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
These resources are intended for skilled developers designing with TI products. You are solely responsible for (1) selecting the appropriate
TI products for your application, (2) designing, validating and testing your application, and (3) ensuring your application meets applicable
standards, and any other safety, security, or other requirements. These resources are subject to change without notice. TI grants you
permission to use these resources only for development of an application that uses the TI products described in the resource. Other
reproduction and display of these resources is prohibited. No license is granted to any other TI intellectual property right or to any third
party intellectual property right. TI disclaims responsibility for, and you will fully indemnify TI and its representatives against, any claims,
damages, costs, losses, and liabilities arising out of your use of these resources.
TI’s products are provided subject to TI’s Terms of Sale (www.ti.com/legal/termsofsale.html) or other applicable terms available either on
ti.com or provided in conjunction with such TI products. TI’s provision of these resources does not expand or otherwise alter TI’s applicable
warranties or warranty disclaimers for TI products.

Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated