Revenue From Contracts With Customers - IFRS 15
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - IFRS 15
By: Brendan Doyle, BA (Hons) in Accounting, MBS (Accounting), MA, H. Dip. Ed. Examiner,
P1 Corporate Reporting.
This article is designed to assist students in preparing for questions on the topic of Revenue on the
P1 Corporate Reporting paper. It is also likely to be of benefit to students of P2 Advanced Corporate
Reporting.
Introduction
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers was issued in May 2014. It is mandatory for all
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, with earlier adoption permitted. IFRS 15
replaces two standards, namely IAS 11 Construction Contracts, and IAS 18 Revenue, as well as several
IFRIC interpretations (13, 15 and 18) and SIC 31. (Note: The SIC was the pre-2003 title of what are now
called IFRICs, and all deal with interpreting standards in issue. IFRICs are not on the P1 syllabus.)
Definition of revenue
Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of the ordinary
activities of an entity.
Measurement of revenue
Revenue shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Fair value is
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price) per IFRS 13.
Further issues
• Selling costs directly incurred in earning a sales contract are capitalised and recognised over
the period revenue from that contract is recognised. Example – sales commission paid to an
agent by a phone company for securing a 12-month phone service contract.
• Goods expected to be returned are not to be recognised as revenue. An estimate should be
made of the amount expected to be returned.
• A warranty is often a separate deliverable in a sales contract. As such it is treated as a
component of the deal. The revenue is separated, and the portion relating to the warranty is
recognised over the warranty period. If the warranty is inseparable from the goods supplied
(i.e. if cost information is not separately available), then a provision should be made under IAS
37, as was the previous practice for all warranties.
• If goods are sold as agent rather than as principal, only the commission receivable is
recognised as revenue. For example, if an estate agent sells a house on behalf of a client for
€300,000, earning 1.5% commission. The revenue of the agent is €4,500, not €300,000.
• If cash is received in advance of supply, the amount is credited to a deferred revenue account,
and carried as a liability in the statement of financial position. The liability is transferred to
revenue when the performance obligation is met. This is the case even if the cash received is
non-refundable (see example 1).
Required: Advise, showing relevant journal entries, how the above transaction should be recognised
in Merlton’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017 and 2018?
Solution:
Applying the 5-step approach:
1. The contract is clear.
2. The performance obligation is clear. Merlton must deliver a vehicle on 3 January 2018.
3. The transaction price is clear: €30,000.
4. There is only one performance obligation. Hence the entire transaction price is allocated to
that.
5. The performance obligation is satisfied on 10 January 2018. Hence Merlton will recognise
revenue on that date.
No revenue is recognised for year ended 31 December 2017 in respect of this transaction. The
€6,000 received in November 2017 is debited to cash, and credited to deferred revenue. It is carried
as a current liability in the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2017.
For year ended 31 December 2018, revenue of €30,000 should be recognised. The journal entry
would be as follows:
Dr Cash €24,000
Dr Deferred revenue €6,000
Cr Revenue €30,000
Example 2: Multiple deliverables
Carltown Ltd, a technology equipment supply company, entered into a contract with a customer on 1
December 2017 to supply, install and service a system of computers. The agreed price was €200,000,
to include a two-year service contract. Payment was made in total following installation in January
2018.
At 31 December 2017, Carltown had supplied all the machines, but had not yet installed any.
Installation happened in January 2018. The directors of Carltown estimated that the computers would
be sold for €150,000 on a stand-alone basis. Installation would cost €20,000, and the two-year service
contract would cost €50,000 if purchased separately.
Required: Advise, showing relevant journal entries, how the above transaction should be recognised
in Carltown’s financial statements for years ended 31 December 2017 and 2018?
Solution:
Applying the 5-step approach:
1. The contract is clear.
2. The performance obligations are three. Carltown must deliver machines, install them and
service them for 2 years.
3. The transaction price is clear. €200,000.
4. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation in the ratio of their
standalone fair values. The total of the individual deliverables would be €220,000. Hence the
transaction price is divided as follows: Machines 200,000 * (150/220) = €136,364;
Installation 200,000 * (20/220) = €18,182; Servicing 200,000 * (50/220) = €45,454.
5. Only the first performance obligation is satisfied during 2017. Hence Carltown will recognise
€136,364 in revenue (and trade receivables) on that date. The installation is completed in
January 2018. Hence €18,182 is recognised on that date. The servicing will happen over 2
years. Hence half the revenue related to the servicing (€22,727) will be recognised in 2018.
The balance will be carried forward as deferred revenue and recognised in 2019.
Required: Advise, showing relevant journal entries, how the above transaction should be recognised
in Shipton’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017 and 2018?
Solution:
Applying the 5-step approach:
1. The contract is clear.
2. The performance obligations are two. First, provide the services, secondly, provide 12
months’ credit on €40,000 of the agreed fee. As the credit period is 12 months, we must
separate this out as a separate performance obligation.
3. The transaction price is clear: €50,000.
4. The fair value of the consideration at the transaction date is calculated. This is €10,000 plus
the present value of the remaining €40,000 at the transaction date. (40,000 * 1/1.07 =
€37,383). Hence the fair value of the consideration receivable is €47,383, and the fair value
of the credit allowed is (50,000 – 47,383) €2,617.
5. The first performance obligation is satisfied on 30 September 2017. Hence Merlton will
recognise revenue of €47,383 on that date. The second performance obligation is satisfied
as time passes over the following 12 months. Hence this portion of revenue is recognised as
finance income on a time-apportioned basis over the year from 30 September 2017 to 30
September 2018.