Wavelet-Based Total Variation and Nonlocal Similarity Model For Image Denoising
Wavelet-Based Total Variation and Nonlocal Similarity Model For Image Denoising
Index Terms—Birothogonal wavelet, heavy noise, nonlocal similarity, split Bregman, total
variation (TV).
2. OBJECTIVE:
To improve the denoising performance under the heavy noise, we propose a denoising model
combining TV model with nonlocal similarity in the wavelet domain to suppress the heavy
noise and enhance the edge details. Then, the split Bregman algorithm is applied to solving
this model iteratively. Experimental results show that the proposed model can mitigate noise
effectively, keep the edges sharper, and retain higher PSNR and SSIM compared to the
previous denoising techniques.
3. PROPOSED SCHEME:
We compare the performance of the proposed method with the previous denoising methods
by artificially degraded images and low light (LL) images. We generate artificially degraded
images by adding the Gaussian noise to the original clean image with σ of 0.2.
4. SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:
HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:
5. CONCLUSION:
In this letter, we propose a denoising model with the combination of TV and nonlocal
similarity based on the wavelet domain to suppress the heavy noise and keep the edge details
of images. The artificially degraded images and the LL images are used to validate the
proposed method. Experimental results show that the proposed method can efficiently
suppress the heavy noise and improve the PSNR and SSIM.
References:
[1] M. Saha, M. K. Naskar, and B. N. Chatterji, “Soft, hard and block thresholding techniques
for denoising of mammogram images,” IETE J. Res., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 186–191, Feb. 2015.
[3] Y. Shen, S. Q. Lou, and X. Wang, “Novel estimation method of point spread function
based on kalman filter for accurately evaluating real optical properties of photonic crystal
fibers,” Appl. Opt., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1838–1845, 2014.
[4] L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal
algorithms,” Phys. D, Nonlinear Phenom., vol. 60, pp. 259–268, Nov. 1992.
[5] T. Y. Zeng, X. L. Li, and M. Ng, “Alternating minimization method for total variation
based wavelet shrinkage model,” Commun. Comput. Phys., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 976–994, Nov.
2010.
[6] U. Kamilov, E. Bostan, and M. Unser, “Wavelet shrinkage with consistent cycle spinning
generalizes total variation denoising,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 187–190,
Apr. 2012.
[7] J. F. Cai, B. Dong, S. Osher, and Z. W. Shen, “Image restoration: Total variation, wavelet
frames, and beyond,” J. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 25, pp. 1033–1089, Oct. 2012.
[8] S. Durand and M. Nikolova, “Denoising of frame coefficients using L1 data-fidelity term
and edge-preserving regularization,” Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 547–576,
May 2007.
[9] X. H. Wang, Y. N. Liu, H. W. Zhang, and L. L. Fang, “A total variation model based on
edge adaptive guiding function for remote sensing image de-noising,” Int. J. Appl. Earth
Observ. Geoinf., vol. 34, pp. 89–95, Feb. 2015.