:

his
r

:
WHAT IS
LEARNING?
There are more than 50 different theories of learning in the field of
­educational research. The presence of so many theories of learning may
be interpreted as a kind of diversity that we may, or perhaps should,
celebrate. But this fact can also be interpreted in a very different manner:
as both ­demonstrating and hiding the complexities of learning. These are
the ­complexities of a reality that are mostly taken for granted, leaving them
1
unavailable for ­reflection.
o (Jorg, Davis & Nickmans, 2007, p. 147)
nr

LEARNING OUTCOMES
As you read through this chapter and undertake the exercises at the end,
you will gain the ability to complete these tasks successfully:
→→ describe the differences between learning as a ‘product’ and learning
as a ‘process’
→→ describe traditional models of teaching and ‘schooling’ in Western
­countries and articulate how such models are often denoted as a
­factory-line method of education
→→ describe and discuss the term ‘learning’ in conjunction with ­theoretical
perspectives of learning, while identifying key aspects of prominent
­theoretical orientations to learning.

KEY TERMS
• behaviourism • humanism
• positive reinforcement • social learning theory
• negative reinforcement • constructivism

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter 1

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 1 10/08/2016 12:37 pm

 SETTING
THE SCENE
It’s Friday and, like on all Fridays, the students of Mr Kahan’s Year 5 class are getting ready
for their weekly spelling and number facts quiz. Chloe takes out her notebook, writes the
date and the numbers one to twenty. Chloe likes the first part of the quiz where she has to
spell ten words randomly selected from the weekly word list each student receives on Monday. Chloe likes
spelling and rarely makes a mistake but, when the next ten questions are random number facts recited by
Mr Kahan, she does not usually do as well. Chloe is a good student and works hard but for some reason she
seems to struggle with multiplication facts and routinely makes a number of errors during the maths part of
the quiz. She studies hard during the week but it seems that multiplication is something she cannot master,
not in school anyway.
After school, Chloe heads home and helps Mum and Dad in the convenience store they own, as her
parents’ first language is not English and sometimes Chloe needs to become a translator. Chloe really enjoys
working in the store and often is behind the counter where she unknowingly uses some of the very same
maths skills she struggles with in school. Often her friends will come in and their love of lollies is evident in
the volume of sweets they choose and through the money spent when Chloe calculates the cost of many of
the items in her head before using the very old cash register they currently have in the store. It is clear in her
interactions with her friends and others who shop in her family store that Chloe’s math skills are superior to
those she demonstrates most Fridays.

1 Can you recall a time in your life as a student when you may have experienced something
similar to Chloe’s experience above? Were there times when what you were ‘learning’
in school did not seem to sink in, or when you found it difficult to demonstrate what you
had learnt?
2 In your opinion, why is it that some students may struggle with learning particular things
in an educational context? What is learning and how do we measure it? As a future teacher
how will you determine what students have learnt?
3 The word ‘learning’ is often taken for granted and not always easily defined. Before
working through this chapter write a definition of learning and be prepared to review that
definition when the information in the chapter has been covered.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

2

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 2 10/08/2016 12:37 pm

 INTRODUCTION
This chapter aims to develop your understanding of the broad, and often taken-for-granted,
concept of learning. Defining learning is not always easy and at times seems ambiguous
with a myriad of intricacies and idiosyncrasies, making one single definition very difficult
to attain. Indeed, the word ‘learning’ itself has a number of meanings depending on the
context in which it is used, but it is the core business of educational institutions and, as
such, warrants some detailed exploration. Those embarking on a career as an educator or
those already in charge of learning and teaching in any educational environment would do
well to draw together their own learning about learning in order to ensure that the art and
science of their craft are up to date and serving the interests of their students. And while we
agree that the complexities of learning are often taken for granted—as noted in the opening
quote—we do not share the overall sentiment of the authors. Theories surrounding human
development and learning are available for reflection and should be the core of any educa-
tor’s philosophical meanderings and practical applications in an education environment.
This chapter is the beginning of such reflection and understandings.
Before exploring learning in greater detail, we need to note a few important provisos.
First, learning is not confined to schools and indeed starts long before a child enters a class-
room. Some might argue that learning begins about seventeen days after conception and
this will be discussed later. Second, learning is an integral component of being human.
Human beings do two things very well: survive and learn. Our capacity for learning has
offered the human race a degree of flexibility and adaptability far surpassing any other spe-
cies on the planet (Ormrod, 2008). Every day we learn and continue to learn, although we
may not be fully conscious of when learning is occurring. We are designed to learn and,
under the right conditions, we do so very well through complex interactions with others via
various environmental stimuli and activities, and through serendipitous moments when we
take in a great deal of information through all of our senses.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter 3

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 3 10/08/2016 12:37 pm

 4 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

Finally, it is important to remember that learning is not always easily measured or

­s omething attributable to a select group of individuals. In many educational contexts, and
arguably too often, learning is associated with test or achievement scores, some demon-
strable outcome or some measure of cognitive ability or scholastic aptitude. This, in turn,
suggests that the role of a teacher is to deliver curriculum and then design mechanisms
to see how much ‘learning’ has occurred, where any errors are, and make adjustments to
ensure that students acquire the requisite content or skill set to be measured. But not all
learning is necessarily measurable or quantifiable and, while we are all capable of l­ earning,
there are also many things that can affect our learning. Significantly, many generations of
teachers were provided guides or texts related to the psychology of learning that paid ­little,
if any, attention to the role of emotions, feelings, personalities, relationships or environ-
ments on learning (Claxton, 1999). We now know that learning is not simply something
that occurs via the transmission of knowledge from one person to another. Learning is often
a complex enterprise involving more than just the cognitive attributes of the mind or iso-
lated as test scores or grades. We learn very well and contemporary research also tells us
that we can learn to learn more effectively and that teachers can be an integral part of the
learning process. Therefore, this chapter has been set out as the beginning of the journey of
understanding development and learning and as the starting point for expanding your own
learning on the road to enhancing, and positively engaging with, the learning of your own
students or what is more commonly referred to as teaching.

DEFINING TEACHING
Understanding Development and Learning’s focus is on learning, and in particular, learning
that takes place in schools. It is therefore important to also unpack notions of teaching
given the dynamic nature between learning and teaching in educational settings. In a sim-
ilar way to unpacking definitions of learning, attempting to define teaching is equally as
arduous. We have all experienced teaching and not all of the teaching we received occurred
in schools. Parents and family members, friends, coaches, celebrities, religious leaders and
many others including the family pet can teach us a thing or two. In terms of educational
settings, the modern profession of teaching was created at about the same time as the first
school systems and before this time anyone who had something to offer in the way of learn-
ing could open a school or apply to the local community to teach in its school (Vick, 2013).
Such individuals were not required to have formal teaching qualifications but this changed
markedly with the introduction of schooling for the masses. The evolution of modern
‘schooling’ is discussed later in this chapter but it is noteworthy here to reiterate that defin-
ing teaching, or indeed a theory of teaching, is not only difficult to do but highly contestable.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 4 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 5

Perhaps one of the reasons surrounding the difficulty in defining teaching is evident in
the reality that most people in Western societies have been to school and have experienced
some form of teaching or another. Having grown up in schools, many adults believe they
know how to teach because they watched teachers for many years (Darling-Hammond et
al., 2005). Many individuals will eagerly form opinions on what constitutes ‘good’ or ‘bad’
teaching and, by association, good or bad ‘schooling’. These opinions, in turn, shape and
are shaped by the prescribed social purposes of education as constituted by political, social
and cultural agendas. In Western societies this has seen theories of teaching taking on par-
ticular practices—or pedagogies—and much of that practice emerged from the industrial
era. Generations of students have been the recipients of this particular form of teaching
whereby a substantive amount of pedagogy has focused on the transmission of information
or knowledge, understanding or wisdom to students in an oral or written framework; teach-
ing is set out to inform, instruct, explain or enlighten (Ackoff & Greenberg, 2008).
The traditional knowledge transmission model of teaching born out of the industrial
era is still evident in many contemporary educational settings. The implications of such
an approach are wide-ranging and noted throughout this chapter where appropriate. In
terms of teaching, such a model reinforces a rather simplistic and intuitive notion of teach-
ing; someone knows something and then teaches it to others (Darling-Hammond, 2006).
The measure of the success of that model is usually some form of assessment and, while it
has succeeded for some students, it has also left many more behind. Indeed, mountains of
research have demonstrated that the notion of transmission teaching doesn’t actually work
most of the time (Darling-Hammond, 2006). This model of teaching is still very prominent
in many contemporary schools and is symptomatic of debates surrounding what consti-
tutes good teaching and, by association, good learning. Worryingly, such debates have been
around for many decades as eloquently encapsulated in the work of American curriculum
theorist, B. O. Smith who, in 1963, stated: ‘We are a long way from a comprehensive theory of
teaching, grounded in a clear cut system of concepts and backed up by empirical e­ vidence.
To develop a general theory … will require bold explorations which take into account of
what has been done, but which are in no means bound by past failures and successes’ (p. 10).

TEACHING IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY

While it may be that we are still ‘a long way from a comprehensive theory of teaching’, there
does seem to be an increasing consensus that a knowledge transmission model of teaching
is ill suited for learning and learners in the twenty-first century. Teaching that focuses on
transferring knowledge rarely takes into account the experiences and needs of students.
Instead such a mindset tends to place curriculum, predetermined content and assessment
as the standard approach of educational endeavour and as such is likely to be unsuccess-
ful for a majority of learners given the diverse nature of student populations in Western

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 5 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 6 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

schools  (Darling-Hammond, 2006). Indeed, research evidence indicates that overall

­student achievement improves through a more contemporary theory of teaching whereby
teaching has these aims:

→→ draws out and works with the pre-existing understandings that students bring
with them
→→ explores subject matter in depth in an effort to provide a firm foundation of factual
knowledge
→→ integrates the teaching of metacognitive skills (Donovan, Bransford & Pellegrino, 2000).

In addition to the significant considerations of teaching made by all the theorists above,
a final important aspect of any contemporary theory of teaching must recognise that
learning and teaching are intimately linked. Teaching is a complex activity that exists in a
reciprocal relationship with learning and as such theories and knowledge of teaching must
begin with deep understandings of human development and learning (Darling-Hammond,
2006). For developmental psychologists such a claim goes without saying, while new theo-
ries and approaches to teaching in educational contexts not only recognise the important
links between human development and learning, but also the importance of understanding
neurological development as it pertains to learning (see, for example, Donovan et al., 2000;
Kalantzis & Cope, 2008; Ormrod, 2008; Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2011). The next section and
the remaining chapters of Understanding Development and Learning adopt this framework
in that it is our belief that, while defining teaching is important, understanding learning and
learners is central to any successful contemporary educational endeavour.

DEFINING LEARNING
As the previous section demonstrated, defining the word ‘learning’ is not an easy­
proposition. Is learning the product of some type of endeavour, is it a process or is it both?
How do we know if something has been learnt? Must all learning be set in a context of
performance or assessment or is it possible to learn something without even realising it?
These questions are central to this chapter and a long history of research and debate. Per-
haps one of the reasons that learning is often difficult to define, or narrowly understood,
can be situated in many people’s experiences of schooling. After all, in Western countries
the vast majority of people have been to school and they have a view of learning that is well
established and linked to teaching. Indeed, it is likely that when most people hear the word
‘learning’ they often think of schools, yet this is problematic for a number of reasons.
First, and as noted in the previous section, not all learning occurs in schools. Most
children arrive for their first day of formal education with a great deal of knowledge along

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 6 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 7

with a vast array of skills and attributes they learnt long before walking into a classroom.
Some  would argue that most learning is done at home, at work or outdoors and as such
schools are but one domain where learning can occur (Ackoff & Greenberg, 2008).
Second, the type of learning that has occurred in most Western schools, including those
in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, has been premised on
a factory-line model of production (Ackoff & Greenberg, 2008; Darling-Hammond, 2006;
Robinson, 2011). Within this model students were typically viewed as empty vessels and a
teacher’s role was to progressively fill up students’ minds with the information necessary for
a successful future and productive citizenship (Nagel, 2013a). Today, this form of educating
has its own inherent difficulties and issues, not least of which is that it was designed during
the industrial era and is still the standard approach for many educational institutions­
trying to engage learners who are arguably remarkably different from any other generation
of students. This is discussed in some detail later in this chapter.
Finally, at a time when information continues to grow exponentially and where students
can access a seemingly infinite array of sources of information, our understanding of learn-
ing has also changed. Not long ago, schools were the primary source of information and
knowledge for students. Today, young people can access information 24/7 within the palm
of their hands and this strengthens the point made earlier: not all learning occurs in schools.
Because learning is not isolated to schools, and in an effort to gain greater insights into
broad notions of learning, it is important for us to look at learning through various lenses.
This is achieved in the following sections by looking at how learning has been approached
in educational contexts, contemporary understandings of learning and various theoretical
perspectives of learning, past and present.

LEARNING STYLES
SOMETHING TO
THINK ABOUT
1.1
Are you a visual, auditory or kinaesthetic learner? You are probably none of the above and
all of the above but none of that matters in terms of educational contexts and learning in
general. There is no credible evidence that learning styles exist and yet many teachers and
schools spend  time, energy and resources trying to determine their students’ learning styles
and adjust their pedagogy and curriculum accordingly. A number of current educational
­psychology ­textbooks also still embrace ‘learning styles’ concepts and advocate the practice of
determining preferred learning styles to enhance educational outcomes (Pashler, McDaniel,
Rohrer & Bjork, 2008).
The concept of ‘learning styles’ or ‘learning modalities’ is not a new educational
­phenomenon and likely arose from psychological taxonomies related to theorising about
­individual personalities. From such taxonomies a number of theories related to learning styles
have emerged over the past decades. In Australia the most popular models are those derived
from Neil Fleming’s VARK theory, which is now typically promoted through inventories used

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 7 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 8 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

to determine if a student is a visual, auditory or kinaesthetic learner (Scott, 2010). But, as noted
earlier, any attempts to modify one’s teaching to cater to such notions of learning modalities
is time wasted, given the lack of any evidence to support such activities. Two key questions are
why such misguided notions continue to permeate many school corridors and professional
­development sessions and what might be a better alternative to such endeavours.
The answer to the first question is multifarious but it could be that, in an attempt to provide
an egalitarian educational context for all, it is commonly proposed that teachers need to know
how their students learn. The truth is that most students learn in very similar ways and we
should not confuse ‘styles’ with abilities, interests and background knowledge: three factors
important for learning and supported by an abundance of research. Focusing on individual
abilities, interests and background therefore provides insights into the answer to the second
question and a foundation for improving learning and educational outcomes. Rather than
trying to discover the illusionary learning style of each student, teachers would do much better
to ­consider content modalities and craft their pedagogy, as much as possible, around their
­students’ levels of prior knowledge, abilities and interests (Willingham, 2009).

Ask yourself…
1 Have you ever participated in some inventory to uncover your learning style? If so,
what actions did you take to support your style of learning? What were the outcomes
of such endeavours?
2 Given that student abilities, interests and background knowledge appear ­repeatedly
in educational and psychological research as important factors for improving
­educational outcomes, what does this mean for you as a future teacher? Consider the
age of the students you wish to teach and provide a list of strategies for engaging with
such important considerations.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF ‘LEARNING’ AND

‘TEACHING’ IN WESTERN SCHOOLS
In order to garner some insights into the history of learning and teaching in schools it is
also important to briefly look at the history of schools themselves for the two are intimately
linked. In the context of human undertakings, the concept of universal education has a
relatively short history. Born out of the seventeenth century, and influenced by various
religious movements, basic schooling for all children only became a national aspiration in
most Western countries in the nineteenth century (Resnick, 2010). Before the nineteenth
century, schools were very different from what they are today and accommodated in mul-
tipurpose buildings with only a handful of children, no set curriculum and where learning
could be characterised as being achieved through rote memory work (Vick, 2013).

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 8 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 9

THE RISE OF THE FACTORY MODEL

The introduction of mass schooling to the general public was influenced by a number
of contextual factors and delivered in very specific formats. In its earliest incarnations,
teaching within schools reinforced rote learning and was generally catechismal in nature;
­individuals were asked a series of questions culled from religious texts and expected to
provide standardised answers (Resnick, 2010). The advent of the industrial era also played
a role in shaping education and with the growth of industry support for public educa-
tion grew, transforming schooling from limited provision to widespread and hierarchi-
cal ­education systems (Carl, 2009). Interestingly, while the content of school curricula
changed during this time to include basic arithmetic, geography, history, some science and
a broader range of texts for reading and writing, the methods of teaching and learning in
the ­classroom remained remarkably unchanged (Resnick, 2010). Some might argue that
the function of schools during this time was to mirror the productivity of factories and, as
such, schools were to teach social and citizenship skills; students arrived as blank slates,
requiring the teacher to fill them in with knowledge in a system set up to ensure efficient
and standardised ­functioning of all parts of the system (Ackoff & Greenberg, 2008).
The precise relationships between industrialisation and the rise of public education are
difficult to pin down but there does appear to be a correlation between the spread of indus-
try and the rise of mass public schooling (Carl, 2009). What is clear is that the factory model
of education has strongly influenced notions of learning and teaching and is still evident in
many schools today (Robinson, 2011). Within this model, learning and teaching are similar
to production lines in a factory: start with a raw product (student), add information via the
expert (teacher) and learning and knowledge is the end product. There is also an assump-
tion in this model that for every bit of teaching there should be an equal amount of learning
and that this can be accurately measured (Nagel, 2013a).
There are a number of issues associated with such a view of learning and teaching,
not least of which is that such a model does not take into account the diverse needs and
­attributes of individuals, nor does it recognise the myriad factors that influence all aspects
of learning. These will be covered throughout Understanding Learning and Development but
it is also significant to note here that the current climate of raising educational ‘­standards’
is predominantly underpinned by a factory model whereby all children can learn if the
standards are correct and delivered through ‘quality’ teaching. Standardised tests, rank-
ings of students and/or schools and rhetoric surrounding a ‘back to basics’ foundation
of ­education elicit romanticised notions of ‘traditional’ schooling and a tacit endorsement
of ­industrial-line education but rarely take into account theories of learning or the nature of
human learning. In the twenty-first century, where students are active consumers of infor-
mation and creators of knowledge, contemporary understandings of learning deserve to

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 9 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 10 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

be centre stage of any educational endeavour and curriculum aspirations. This begins with
looking at various theories of learning, past and present.

THEORIES OF ‘LEARNING’, PAST

AND ­PRESENT
There’s nothing so practical as a good theory.
(Lewin, 1951, p.169)

Kurt Lewin, considered by many as the father of modern social psychology, was concerned
throughout his work to integrate theory and practice (Kolb, 1984). But the linking of theory
to practice is not always easily achieved. Anecdotally speaking, our collective experience in
the field of education has often witnessed many debates linking theory to practice. It is not
uncommon to hear teacher mentors tell their prac students to forget what they are doing at
university because now they are in the real world! It is also not uncommon for students to
question the purpose of studying theory when the everyday realities of the classroom often
seem far removed from the philosophical or scientific meanderings of a textbook. These
may seem to be broad generalisations but experience suggests otherwise. Therefore, it is
important to note the significance of examining theories before engaging in such activity.
One of the major goals of educational psychology is to understand learning and teach-
ing; research becomes an important tool in achieving this objective. Research, on the other
hand, allows for the collection of data and from such data various theories can be derived
and further research conducted to validate a theory or create a new theory. Of itself, a
theory is a framework that can be used to identify and explain relations among natural,
observable phenomena (Fiske, 2004). Research and theory development are part of a cycli-
cal process and new theories are used to fill gaps in any existing explanations of a particular
phenomenon. Educational psychologists and educators have a long history of developing
theories around child development and the phenomenon of education. We have a number
of theories related to cognitive development, for example, that have affected many aspects
of educational endeavour. Importantly, good theories can posit causal relations, attempt to
find coherence, form good narratives, aim for simplicity in explanation, are testable, solve
problems and inform practice (Fiske, 2004).

WHAT IS LEARNING?
Given the importance of linking theory to practice, it should be apparent that, in an educa-
tional context, many theories related to learning have been developed over time. Some of

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 10 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 11

these theories continue to influence education today, while others are new and exciting to
the field. To explore some of these important theories we begin by asking a very significant
question: what is learning? In many educational psychology textbooks, learning is often
defined as a relatively permanent change in behaviour, knowledge and thinking skills as a
result of experience (see, for example, Krause, Bochner, Duchesne & McMaugh, 2010; San-
trock, 2011). This definition appears very straightforward and concise but, as noted earlier,
learning is far more complicated than what can be found in singular definitions. In educa-
tional contexts, learning is generally considered as an outcome or an objective suggesting
some change in a student and as such embodies the types of definition presented above.
It is noteworthy that an approach that benchmarks learning in terms of some measure of
change or an outcome will, by necessity, emphasise learning as a ‘product’. Too often this
product is quantified by a grade or mark that, in turn, presumes that the higher the mark,
the greater the learning that has taken place. This can be problematic, especially if we con-
sider whether a person needs to perform or produce something in order for learning to
have happened (Merriam, Caffarella & Baumgartner, 2007). Fortunately, in the last couple
of decades we have witnessed some significant changes in how learning is conceptualised
and subsequently seen expanded notions of learning emerge that go beyond simply being
the product of some form of scholastic endeavour.

The work of Saljo

Changing conceptions of learning beyond that of it being a product is most evident in the
work of Professor Roger Saljo, who is considered by many as a pioneer in contemporary
research into learning. Professor Saljo is professor of education and educational psychology
at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, and in the late 1970s he published a seminal piece
of work that has influenced learning theorists since. In this study, Saljo (1979) found that
students conceptualised learning within five categories:
1 Learning as a quantitative increase in knowledge: Learning is the acquisition of informa-
tion and ‘knowing a lot’.
2 Learning as memorising: Learning is storing information that can be reproduced.
3 Learning as acquiring: Learning is acquiring facts, skills and methods that can be
retained and used as necessary.
4 Learning as making sense or abstracting meaning: Learning involves relating parts of the
subject matter to each other and to the real world.
5 Learning as interpreting and understanding reality in a different way: Learning involves
comprehending the world by reinterpreting knowledge.
The significance of Saljo’s (1979) work lies in the fact that the conceptions of learning
demarcate learning as both a product and a process. As a process, learning includes changes
in the way people understand, experience or conceptualise the world around  them.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 11 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 12 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

­ onsequently, learning can be experienced as something external (something that happens

C
as a result of an experience) and something internal (something a person does in order to
understand the world) (Nagel, 2013a). Saljo’s (1979) work has since been reinforced through
a plethora of studies involving people of varying ages in a number of different learning con-
texts (Purdie & Hattie, 2002).
The earlier work of Marton and Saljo (1976) also found that if students viewed learning
as simply reproductive (i.e. rote memorising and replication of information) rather than as
a process of making meaning and reflection then they were less likely to construct well-­
organised concepts regarding their learning. In other words, an individual’s conceptions of
learning will actually affect their own learning. Guy Claxton, a renowned author and Profes-
sor of the Learning Sciences at the University of Bristol Graduate School of Education, has
noted that ‘how well people learn is shown to be a function not only of the learning tools
they possess, but the implicit beliefs they have picked up’ (1999, p. 33).

IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING

A further important aspect of Saljo’s work is that it is not meant to imply that there now
exists a universality of meaning with reference to learning, demarcated as categories and
described by Saljo (1979) and others. In educational contexts, learning is often defined
according to different socially and culturally established conventions and, as such, teach-
ers and students may exhibit a variety of approaches to learning in different situations
depending on content, context and the demands of a particular task (Richardson, 2005).
Concurrently, an individual’s personal and cultural beliefs are often used to support various
assumptions about learning and we all make assumptions about learning whether we real-
ise it or not (Nagel, 2013a). Assumptions are made about what is important for s­ tudents to
learn; who can learn and why; and what strategies can be used to enhance learning (Brans-
ford, Derry, Berliner, Hammerness & Beckett, 2005). To that end there are also a n­ umber of
assumptions about learning and theories of learning that are worthy of scrutiny and elab-
oration.
First, and in an educational context, it is significant to remember that what is taught is
not always the same as what is learnt. Students are not empty vessels waiting to be filled
but rather are individuals who arrive in school with a diverse set of experiences and skills
that are always part of any learning experience (Nagel, 2013a). Second, because learning
is both a product and a process, traditional views of teaching along with Western societal
assumptions about learning are often too narrowly defined and focus too heavily on tangi-
ble outcomes such as assignments and exams (Claxton, 1999; Robinson, 2011). Finally, and
as noted throughout this chapter, learning is often taken for granted but it is too ambiguous
a concept to articulate in a single sentence. As the quote from Jorg et al. (2007) at the start

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 12 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 13

of this chapter shows, there are more than fifty theories of learning, which are ultimately
unable to be covered in a single volume of work such as this textbook. Instead, a number
of prominent perspectives of learning important to our understanding of formal education
are presented and, as a learner, it is up to you to take what you know, pull it apart, add to it
and ultimately form new ideas, understanding and conceptions of learning. This will be a
significant component of your own understanding about development and learning and to
help facilitate this process you will need to undertake several tasks:

→→ examine some key theories of learning

→→ think about your own beliefs of learning and question your own experiences of learning
as you explore new theories of learning
→→ reflect on ideas underpinning your understanding of learning
→→ develop your understanding of learners and their developmental needs.
These points are intended to guide your learning and it is likely that you have already
begun to engage in some of these ideas as this chapter has progressed. At this point, it is
timely to look at some perspectives and theories of learning that have shaped educational
practice and are still influential today.

THEORETICAL ORIENTATIONS TO LEARNING

As we have seen, learning is best understood as both a process and a product. But looking
at learning as a process (rather than an end product) requires us to focus on what happens
when learning takes place and such explanations help to frame various theoretical orienta-
tions of learning (Merriam et al., 2007). Five of the most commonly referred to orientations
to learning that can be found in psychology and educational psychology include these:

→→ behaviourist orientations to learning

→→ cognitive orientations to learning
→→ humanistic orientations to learning
→→ social cognitive orientations to learning
→→ constructivist orientations to learning.
Each of these orientations to learning, along with the key individuals who have helped
shape or influence them, is explored below. It is important to note that there often is a
degree of overlap between and among the orientations. As you read and develop your own
understanding of learning, you will see commonalities and points of convergence emerging
out of the details of each specific orientation. Another important consideration related to
the theoretical orientations you are about to explore is that learning and human develop-
ment are intimately intertwined and each orientation should be considered as an overview.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 13 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 14 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

Other chapters in this text will give greater attention to aspects of human development and
in particular neurodevelopment and the importance of human development to learning
and education.

Behaviourist orientations to learning

Behaviourism The term behaviourism stems from the early works of John Watson (1913, 1914, 1925), who
A field of psychology
concerned with believed that the key to understanding learning could be found through the analysis of
­individual behaviour.
behaviour. Watson was an American psychologist whose initial research work focused on
animal studies but then controversially was applied in a human study involving an infant
who would become famously known in psychology circles as ‘Little Albert’. Watson and a
graduate student by the name of Rosalie Rayner set out to prove that they could condition
a fear response in a child or, in other words, have a child learn to be afraid (Watson & Ray-
ner, 1920). In order to achieve this task they started exposing nine-month-old Little Albert
to a series of stimuli, including a white rat, and found that the young boy showed no fear
towards any of the items presented to him. The next part of the experiment saw the rat
presented to Albert again but this time it was accompanied by the hitting of a metal pipe
with a hammer behind, and out of view, of the child. Understandably, Little Albert was so
startled by the loud bang he began to cry. Watson and Rayner repeated this over and over
again to the point where Albert began to cry as soon as he saw the rat, even when the bang-
ing had been stopped. In essence Little Albert learnt to be afraid of the rat. The ethics of
such an experiment are very problematic, not least of which because it is believed that
Note: Albert’s fear was never deconditioned.
wing Behaviourists believe that observable stimuli produce observable behaviours, as in the
be set
rate
study done by Watson and Rayner (1920), and as such learning can be conditioned through
ote. changes to the stimuli. One of the foremost behavioural theorists to expand on the work of
John Watson was Burrhus Frederic (B. F.) Skinner. Skinner too was a prominent American
psychologist and was the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology at Harvard University from
1958 until his retirement in 1974. Skinner (1953, 1963) described learning as an enduring
change of behaviour resulting from external events, be they conscious or unconscious. For
Skinner, learning occurred when some event or condition (stimulus) triggered an action
(response) and those actions, which were rewarded in some manner, were likely to be
repeated (learnt) (Nagel, 2013a). Both Skinner and Watson have contributed a great deal to
our collective understanding of learning and two of the standout behaviourist terms associ-
ated with their work and often observable in schools are classical and operant conditioning.
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Classical conditioning focuses on the learning of involuntary emotional or physiological
responses such as fear, sweating or increased muscle tension vis-à-vis some form of stimuli

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 14 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 15

(Santrock, 2011). The example of Little Albert could be considered classical conditioning,
albeit with rather negative consequences. In an educational context, classical conditioning
can be involved in both negative and positive experiences in a classroom or school. For
example, a child may associate pleasurable feelings with a particular classroom due to its
visual appeal, while another classroom may elicit fear or anxiety because the teacher in the
room is overly critical. In this sense teachers can play both an implicit and explicit role in
classical conditioning and must always reflect on their practice to ensure that any condi-
tioning that is occurring is positive.
OPERANT (INSTRUMENTAL) CONDITIONING
For behaviourists, operant conditioning, which is also sometimes called instrumental con-
ditioning, is a form of learning in which the consequences of a behaviour produce changes
that will increase or decrease the probability that the behaviour will reoccur (Santrock,
2011). The consequences of the behaviour usually take the form of reinforcement or punish- Positive
­reinforcement
ment whereby reinforcement increases the probability that a behaviour will reoccur, while The addition of
a pleasurable or
punishment decreases the probability of repeated behaviours. The word ‘reinforcement’ ­desirable stimulus
actually means to strengthen the behaviour and reinforcement can be both positive and after a desired
behaviour is
negative (Domjan, 2014). Positive reinforcement is easily explained and readily observable ­exhibited.

in schools and homes alike. In school, common positive reinforcers include praise, special
privileges, high marks, scholarships, tokens, prizes, trophies, awards, certificates and public
recognition. Even something as simple as a smile from a teacher can act as a positive, and
powerful, reinforcement. Negative reinforcement, on the other hand, refers to the removal Negative
­reinforcement
of unpleasant events or experiences after a desired behaviour is performed. A teacher may The removal of an
undesirable stimulus
create a sense of surveillance by staring at a student until the student performs the desired or object after a
behaviour, thereby eliminating the uncomfortable sense of someone watching over them. desired behaviour is
exhibited.
Positive and negative reinforcement are commonplace strategies in schools, where the
standard mindset is changing behaviour. Perhaps one way to remember the difference
between the two is that in positive reinforcement something is added, while in nega-
tive ­reinforcement something is subtracted or removed. Both strategies are regularly used
in educational contexts and behaviourists believe that, for learning to occur, the role of
the teacher is to create an environment of optimal conditioning: to provide the appropri-
ate stimulus via the curriculum and follow this with some measure of positive or negative
­reinforcement (reward or punishment) (Nagel, 2013a).
The use of rewards and punishment is still quite prevalent in schools, particularly in
terms of behaviour management strategies. There are a number of issues associated with
such approaches to learning and behaviour, especially in terms of motivation and ethical
considerations related to punishment. This is covered in greater detail later (in ­Chapter 7),
but it is important to note here that an over-reliance on operant conditioning can ­actually

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 15 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 16 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

hinder learning by focusing on extrinsic, rather than intrinsic, forms of ­reinforcement.

Equally significant is that both rewards and punishment operate on an ‘if you do this, you
get that’ strategy and are dictated by someone other than the learner (Kohn, 1999).
Behaviourism also tends to neglect the contribution of cognition and cognitive skills to any
learning process, especially in terms of more complex forms of behaviour such as problem
See Chapter 7 for a
detailed examination
solving. The important links between cognition and learning are very significant consider-
of motivation. ations for any teacher and educational context and as such are noted in the next section.

Cognitive orientations to learning

Cognition is a term that essentially means ‘thought’ and refers to the mental processes
involved in comprehension and acquiring knowledge through experiences and the senses
(Santrock, 2011). Such mental processes are often described as higher order functions of
the brain encompassing language, imagination, perception, planning, thinking, remember-
ing, judging and problem solving. Cognition is an important area of study across a number
of disciplines but its meaning can vary slightly from one field to another. For example, in
psychology and cognitive science, cognition is often depicted as an information-­processing
model within the mind, while a branch of social psychology known as social cognition
focuses on attitudes, attribution and group dynamics (Blomberg, 2011; Sternberg, 2012).
The dynamic nature of educational environments encompasses aspects of all disciplinary
fields associated with ‘c ognition’ but in terms of learning there are a number of significant
aspects surrounding a cognitive orientation to this process.
One of the most important aspects of cognitive orientations to learning is that of human
development. For cognitive theorists, learning is intimately linked with developmental
changes and a gradual increase in the sophistication of mental processes. For example,
researchers know that the mind of a two-year-old child is vastly different from that of an
adolescent. This will obviously affect all aspects of learning and cognitivists focus on inter-
nal mental processes such as insight, executive control, attention, memory and perception
as they apply to development and learning. Cognitive orientations to learning also focus
on how learners manipulate information and make meaning out of information and expe-
rience. Deriving from this orientation is an underlying framework where learning is often
delineated as the acquisition of new knowledge.
THE INFORMATION-PROCESSING MODEL
One of the foremost models of knowledge acquisition in a cognitive orientation to learn-
ing is the information-processing model. In this model, a great deal of emphasis is placed
on how children process information through attention, memory, thinking and many other
complex cognitive processes. The information-processing model emphasises that children
manipulate information, monitor it and strategise about it while actively making sense of

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 16 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 17

their experiences and modifying their own thinking in response to environmental demands
(Nagel, 2013a; Santrock, 2011). The model itself often portrays cognitive endeavour as being
similar to how computers process information, while cognitive psychologists often use anal-
ogies to computers to help explain the relation between cognition and the brain (­Martinez,
2010). This view of cognition is often criticised for being overly simplistic in that human
thinking, cognitive activity and learning cannot be easily described in the same manner as
binary equations and the rigid algorithmic framework associated with computers (Ormrod,
2008). But, in an educational context, there are a number of important strengths in this
model, particularly with its focus on understanding how memory operates and in develop-
ing pedagogy to assist in advanced problem-solving skills. This model is also an appropriate
framework for much of the information and discussion in Understanding Development and
Learning, given our emphasis on understanding processes and functions of the brain and
mind in connection with child development. Indeed, many of the features of this model are
evident throughout this book and in particular in exploring contemporary understandings
of attention and memory as they pertain to human development and learning.
Human development is an important aspect of cognitive orientations to learning. The
field of psychology has seen a number of theorists working in the area of human devel-
opment and learning and many of these individuals and their work are examined in later
chapters. But the important nexus between development and cognition is being heavily
influenced by newer understandings of the human brain that are also presented through-
out Understanding Learning and Development and form the underpinning framework of this
entire volume of work.

Humanist orientations to learning

Humanist orientations to learning tend to pay less attention to aspects of cognition and
give greater attention to student needs, emotions, values and self-perceptions. Born out
of humanist psychology in the 1950s, this orientation to understanding psychology and
learning emerged as an alternative to behaviourism’s overly ‘scientific’ methods and psychi-
atry’s focus on mental illness and disturbance (Nagel, 2013a). It is noteworthy that, before
the 1950s, the early twentieth century had a number of individuals who could be noted as
pioneers in humanist education. Inspired by the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Friedrich
Froebel and others, Maria Montessori, John Dewey and Rudolf Steiner embodied human-
ist philosophies in their writing and educational endeavours (Snowman et al., 2009). Today,
Montessori and Steiner schools can be found in many Western countries, while the work
of Dewey has been instrumental in shaping education and social reform since his earliest Humanism
A philosophical and/
writings in the late 1800s. or ethical position
Humanism is a system of thought that is predominantly concerned with the human that emphasises and
values the agency of
experience, recognising the uniqueness of human beings and the qualities of life that human beings.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 17 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 18 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

c­ ontribute to our humanity (Nagel, 2013a). A central tenet in humanism is the value of
human worth and dignity. In an educational context, this is translated into the practice
of shaping the whole child with a view to improving his or her character. Academic per-
formance, motivation and behaviour are linked specifically to the learning environment,
whereby supportive classroom cultures promote enhanced self-esteem, intrinsic motiva-
tion and overall well-being and success (Snowman et al., 2009). And while humanist edu-
cators such as Dewey and Montessori continue to influence educational endeavour, the
work of two key twentieth-century psychologists has also added a great deal to humanist
orientations to learning.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

Abraham Maslow was an American psychologist who is best known for creating a ‘­hierarchy
of needs’, which is a theory of psychological health predicated on fulfilling innate human
needs. For Maslow, people have an innate drive to satisfy various needs that he organised
into a hierarchy of five levels presented as a pyramid (see Figure 1.1).
As evident in Figure 1.1, Maslow believed that basic needs must be met before any
higher levels can be achieved. If a learner’s physiological, safety and belongingness needs are
not met, then factors like self-esteem—which are integral to academic success—cannot be
attained. This alone says much about the probable impact of poverty and socio-­e conomic
disadvantage on learning (Martinez, 2010). Contemporary neuroscientific studies support

FIGURE 1.1 MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS

Self-fulfillment
needs
Self-
Self-
actualisation
actualisation:
Achieving
achievingone’s
full potential,
one’s potential,
including
including creative
creative activities
activities
Esteem needs:
Esteem needs Psychological
Prestige
prestige and feeling of needs
accomplishment
Belongingness and
Belongingness and love
love needs:
needs
Intimate
intimaterelationships, friends
friendships, friends

Safety needs:
Safety needs Basic needs
Security,
security, safety

Physiological needs:
Physiological needs
Food, water, warmth,
food, water, warmth, rest
rest

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 18 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 19

Maslow’s work in that children raised in environments where basic needs are not met and
where positive relationships are unavailable are subjected to high levels of stress which in
turn negatively affect most aspects of their development and learning (McEwen, 2002; Nagel
2012a; National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2004, 2005, 2007; Shonkoff,
2010; Shonkoff & Levitt, 2010; Shore, 1997).
Notwithstanding the importance of meeting basic needs as depicted in Maslow’s hier-
archy, self-actualisation is the centrepiece of Maslow’s theory and something he himself
was deeply interested in. Maslow’s research interests focused on studying psychologically
healthy people in order to understand them and apply his findings so that others could
more fully realise their potential for psychological health, growth and overall fulfilment
(Martinez, 2010). In terms of learning in an educational context, Maslow’s work asks educa-
tors to put student needs at the forefront of any learning situation, rather than those of the
teacher or curriculum (Nagel, 2013a). Another humanist psychologist who complements
Maslow in terms of meeting the needs of students and influencing education is Carl Rogers.

Rogers: nurturing students

Carl Rogers was a psychotherapist who pioneered a new approach to helping people cope
more effectively with their problems and is widely regarded as one of the most influential
psychologists in American history (Snowman et al., 2009). Rogers initially worked with
delinquent children, becoming increasingly interested in child guidance and therapy. He
formed the view that the key aspect for positive therapies could be found in setting up sup-
portive environments and relationships rather than psychoanalytic techniques. Rogers’s
work transcended clinical practice and he became interested in education, where he argued
that a teacher’s goal should be to nurture students rather than direct their learning (Krause
et al., 2010). For Rogers, learning was about personal change and growth and he believed
that human beings had an inner drive towards self-fulfilment and a natural potentiality for
learning. He believed that, within a nurturing environment, learners should be free to learn,
explore and reach their full potential and that the best learning came from ‘doing’ (Nagel,
2013a). In one of his works, which embodies his philosophy in its title, Freedom to Learn,
Rogers sets out a number of principles for learning and most notably acknowledges that a
teacher’s role is not just to deliver a curriculum but to give equal measure and attention to
the intellect and emotions of each and every individual learner (Rogers, 1969).
The influence of the work of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow on learning and educa-
tion cannot be understated. This is evident in contemporary educational rhetoric, which
positions teachers as ‘facilitators’ and stresses the importance of meeting the ‘needs’ of each
individual learner. Their work embodies humanist orientations to learning and empha-
sises that, for learning to occur, the heart of any educational endeavour must focus on
personal and emotional development within a caring and supportive environment where

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 19 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 20 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

student needs, desires, personal values, self-perceptions and motivations are considered.
The  importance of the learning environment also plays a central role in social cognitive
orientations to learning.

SOMETHING TO
THINK ABOUT GENIE: A CASE STUDY IN THE DEPRIVATION OF STIMULATION

1.2 In terms of learning, experiences or the lack thereof matter. Chapter 2 presents n
evidence of how experiences shape the neural architecture of the mind but, long before
­ euroscientific

researchers could look at the inner workings of the brain, examples of what happens when
­children are deprived of certain experiences provided a great deal of support for the work of
Maslow and others. One tragic story is particularly compelling.
On 4 November 1970, a social worker discovered a thirteen-year-old girl who, by all
accounts, had been forced to flounder helplessly within an environment Maslow might have
noted as the bottom of his hierarchy. This young girl, who was later named ‘Genie’ by social
workers, lived most of her childhood from the age of eighteen months in an environment of
extreme deprivation. It appears that sometime before her second birthday, Genie’s father
­confined her to a small room, often tied to a ‘potty’ chair. It was also discovered that some nights
Genie was bound in a sleeping bag and forced to sleep in an enclosed crib with a cover of metal
screening all around it. Genie was not allowed to speak to anyone; her mother and brother,
who rarely left the family home, were forbidden from speaking to her. By the age of thirteen
when she was discovered, Genie was almost entirely mute. It should come as no surprise that
she had severe emotional difficulties but it may surprise some to know that she was physically
­underdeveloped and her stature was more typical of an eight-year-old than a teenager. Genie
was promptly removed from her environment and her parents charged with child abuse but
many of the secrets of the abuse remain untold as her father committed suicide before ­standing
trial. Genie herself received extensive treatment but much of the damage was irreversible
(Curtiss, 1977; Newton, 2004). Today, the case of ‘Genie’ is used by researchers to highlight what
happens when humans are deprived of the very circumstances Maslow argues are necessary for
learning and how lack of stimulation can lead to lifelong developmental problems.

Ask yourself…
Fortunately, it is unlikely any teacher will ever deal with children who experienced a life
anything like Genie’s. But we do know that children who grow up in impoverished regions
or neighbourhoods or whose basic needs are not being met outside school do end up
in classrooms. What does Maslow’s hierarchy suggest would be the most important
­considerations to attend to when encountering disadvantaged children?

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 20 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 21

Social cognitive orientations to learning

As is tacitly suggested in the title, social cognitive orientations to learning imply a link
between relationships, cognition and learning. In itself a social cognitive orientation to
learning incorporates elements of both behaviourist (operant conditioning) and cognitive
(information-processing) theories. Social cognitive orientations to learning emphasise how
behavioural and personal factors interact with the social and physical environment; the
roots of this orientation are derived from a framework known as social learning theory Social learning
theory
(Bandura, 1976). A theory of learning
that posits that
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY learning is a
­cognitive process
The principal architect behind social learning theory is Stanford University Emeritus that occurs in a
social context.
­P rofessor of Psychology Albert Bandura. In the 1960s, Bandura conducted a series of famous
experiments that have become collectively known as the ‘Bobo doll study’. In different
­variations of these experiments, children were able to observe a woman beating up a Bobo
doll and using aggressive language. (A Bobo doll is a large inflated doll with a sand base
that rocks easily to and fro and when struck always returns to an upright position unless
unexpectedly deflated.) When provided opportunities to engage with the Bobo doll, those
children who witnessed violent and aggressive behaviour modelled the same behaviour,
with or without any encouragement, rewards or punishment. Bandura’s work is significant
because it departs from behaviourism’s insistence that all aspects of behaviour and learn-
ing are directed by some form of reinforcement or reward. Unlike the behaviourist Skinner,
Bandura believes that human beings think about the relationship between their behaviour
and consequences; social learning theory is arguably a transition between behaviourist and
cognitive orientations to learning.
Over time Bandura’s explanations for learning gave more attention to cognitive factors
such as attention, memory, rehearsal and motivation and he relabelled his earlier work on
social learning theory to social cognitive theory (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013; see also Ban-
dura, 1986, 1997, 2001). But the key principles underpinning both social learning theory
and social cognitive orientations to learning suggest that people can learn by observing the
behaviours of others and the outcomes of those behaviours (Nagel, 2013a).
TRIADIC RECIPROCALITY AND LEARNING VERSUS BEHAVIOUR
Another significant difference between behaviourism and social cognitive orientations to
learning is that, unlike the central tenets of behaviourism, a social cognitive orientation
recognises that learning can occur without a demonstrable change in behaviour. In other
words, people can learn through observation alone and their learning may not necessar-
ily be shown in their behaviour; observation and learning do not necessarily require imi-
tation or mimicry (Nagel, 2013a). Social cognitive orientations to learning also recognise
the role of the physical and social environments on behaviour and learning. For example,

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 21 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 22 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

FIGURE 1.2 TRIADIC RECIPROCAL CAUSATION MODEL

Behaviour
Self-evaluation and
self-observations
Personal
Environment
characteristics
Context, teacher,
Cognitive and affective
neighbourhood
factors

school resources, the consequences of actions, the nature of a task, the use of r­ einforcement
or ­punishment or both, other people, group dynamics and the actual physical size of a
­classroom can all affect learning according to social cognitive theorists (Nagel, 2013a; Snow-
man et  al., 2010; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013). Consequently, the environment, behaviour
and individual characteristics such as cognitive and emotional factors influence and are
influenced by one another and form a model that Bandura (1986) refers to as triadic recip-
rocality or what others call the triadic reciprocal causation model (Snowman et al., 2010;
Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013).
The work of Bandura and other social cognitive theorists has had, and continues to
have, an impact on our understanding of behaviour and learning in an educational con-
text. One of the most important considerations derived from this work and highlighted by
Bandura is an assumption that people, and not environmental forces, are the predominant
cause of their own behaviour (Snowman et al., 2010). According to Bandura (2006), ‘people
are self-organising, proactive, self-regulating and self-reflecting. They are not simply onlook-
ers in their behaviour. They are contributors to their life circumstances, not just products
of them’ (p. 164). This places a great deal of emphasis on many aspects of development and
highlights the importance of the learner in any educational context. The final orientation to
be explored in this chapter complements this view.

SOMETHING TO
THINK ABOUT THE NEEDS OF TEACHERS

1.3 The social environment of a classroom and school is not only important in terms of student
development and learning but also is an important consideration in terms of teacher
performance and well-being. Schools are places where human interaction is central to
teaching and ­learning and the work of Bandura (2006) and others is not only important for
considering pedagogy, ­student outcomes and student welfare but also significant when
considering teacher ­welfare. For example, teachers are among the highest white-collar

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 22 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 23

professionals in self-reported work-related stress; such stress is often a major contributing

factor to teacher burn-out (­Johnson et al., 2005). There has been a great deal of research
into stressors present in the teaching environment, highlighting a number of c­ ontributing
factors, including class size, high-stakes testing, challenging student behaviours and school
management structures to name a few (see, for example, Ballet & Kelchtermans 2009;
Montgomery & Rupp, 2005). Aside from the potential health issues associated with burn-out, it
is also evident that as teachers burn out, their tolerance, relationships with others and concern
and care for their students decline along with associated lowering of outcomes in terms of
student achievement (Black, 2001; Cozolino, 2013). Interestingly, just about every correlate
of teacher burn-out links directly or indirectly to the negative effects of social and emotional
disconnection, suggesting that future teachers would benefit greatly from training that
includes a strong emphasis on the social and emotional skills required to succeed personally
and as a teacher (Cozolino, 2013). It is important for future and current teachers to constantly
ensure they take care of their own well-being and hierarchy of needs within the social milieu
that exists when working with young minds in an educational context.

Ask yourself…
1 In your experiences as a student, have you encountered any teachers who may have
appeared to be burnt out? Conversely, did you engage with teachers who seemed to
have an endless supply of energy and enthusiasm? What do you think might have been
contributing factors to each and within particular contexts?
2 A number of studies have shown that teachers who experience more positive emo-
tions related to their work are more resilient, intrinsically motivated and better able
to cope with the demands of their job. What strategies, if any, do you have to deal with
stress and foster your own resilience? What might you be able to do with students to
build positive emotions in your classroom?

Constructivist orientations to learning

Not too dissimilar to some of the other orientations presented above, constructivist
­orientations to learning (constructivism) share a number of related perspectives and theo- Constructivism
A theory of learning
rists. Dewey, Montessori, Steiner, Piaget and Vygotsky are historical influences within whereby individuals
construct knowledge
aspects of this orientation to learning (Martinez, 2010; Merriam et al., 2007; Snowman et al., and meaning from
2009). One leading theorist has gone so far as to describe constructivism as ‘a vast and their experiences.

woolly area in contemporary psychology, epistemology and education’ (von Glaserfeld

1997, p. 203). Perhaps the woolliness in this area stems from a variety of perspectives that
have been labelled constructivist and, while there does not appear to be one easily defined
constructivist theory, the simple underlying premise for constructivists is that learning is a
process of constructing meaning; it is how people make sense of their experience (Merriam
et al., 2007). Beyond that premise there are significant differences among constructivist

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 23 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 24 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

t­ heorists as to the role of experience, the nature of reality, what knowledge is of interest and
whether the process of making meaning is primarily an individual or social one (Steffe &
Gale, 1995). The distinction between whether a person constructs their learning and under-
standing through a social process or as an individual is an important one. This dichotomy
has seen the emergence of the two most prominent versions of this orientation: cognitive
constructivism and social constructivism.
COGNITIVE CONSTRUCTIVISM
Cognitive constructivism focuses on the individual and the role of cognition in accommo-
dating new information in existing conceptual frameworks or schemes. The overlap with a
cognitive orientation to learning is fairly self-evident and may be considered an extension
of Jean Piaget’s work. Indeed, some view Piaget as a constructivist and perhaps the most
important originator of cognitive constructivism (Martinez, 2010). Within this branch of
constructivism, making meaning relies on an individual’s cognitive capacities and abili-
ties, whereby meaning is constructed via the individual’s previous and current knowledge
structure; learning is the product of an internal cognitive activity; and learners actively con-
struct knowledge and understanding (Merriam et al., 2007; Nagel, 2013a). In an educational
context, this orientation suggests that learning is accommodated through providing expe-
riences that ‘induce cognitive conflict and hence encourage learners to develop new knowl-
edge schemes that are better adapted to experience. Practical activities supported by group
discussions form the core of such pedagogical practices’ (Driver, Asoko, Leach, Mortimer
& Scott, 1994, p. 6). It is significant to note that, while cognitive constructivism focuses on
the individual, classrooms that embody such practices are recognised as places where indi-
viduals are actively engaged with others as they attempt to understand and interpret phe-
nomena for themselves and where the ‘teacher’s role is to provide the physical experiences
and to encourage reflection’ (Driver et al., p. 7). This stands in contrast to the theoretical
foundations of social constructivists.
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM
Social constructivism also focuses on the construction of meaning but emphasises the use
of cultural tools ( for example, language, mathematics, diagrams, approaches to problem
solving) as a fundamental influence on making meaning. Social constructivists often refer to
the learning process as a form of negotiating meaning, given the links between one’s cultural
tools and the necessity of engaging socially in talk and activities about shared problems or
tasks (Merriam et al., 2007; Snowman et al., 2009). For social constructivists, making mean-
ing is a dialogic process and, while a learner’s cognitive capacities are important, it is the
cultural tools at learners’ disposal that shape learning through authentic, real-life activities
to create common or shared understanding of some phenomenon (Nagel, 2013a; Snowman
et al., 2009). The works of the Lev Vygotsky and Jerome Bruner are often associated with
this orientation. Briefly, Vygotsky viewed learning as an activity socially mediated through

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 24 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 25

the symbols and language of a culture, while Bruner advocated a discovery approach to See Chapter 9 for a
detailed look at the
learning via the use of problem solving (Krause et al., 2010). work of Vygotsky and
Bruner.
Although cognitive and social constructivists emphasise different aspects of learning,
they are not completely incompatible. In his description of constructivist epistemology,
Windschitl notes that ‘learning is an act of both individual interpretation and negotiation
with other individuals’ (2002, p. 142). Each approach does not deny the value of the other
and all forms of constructivism understand learning to be an active, rather than a passive,
endeavour (Merriam et al., 2007). In an educational context, learners are viewed as self-­
regulated and active participants in their learning and active ‘c onstructors’ of meaning
through individual and group endeavour. For constructivists a fundamental consideration
is the student, and so too is the fostering of positive student–teacher relationships.

CONCLUSION
It should be apparent that the orientations to learning noted in this chapter maintain
important considerations in terms of all aspects of educational endeavour. It should also be
apparent that the divergence of ideas found within each orientation posits a degree of legit-
imacy in views of learning as being complex and multifarious (Claxton, 1999). Generations
of teachers have drawn their insights from the theories and theorists noted throughout this
chapter and many continue to do so. Importantly, we should never assume learning to be
a simple, taken-for-granted notion of the daily interactions between teachers and students
in schools. Nor should teachers or those training to be teachers assume that they have
learnt all they need to learn about learning once they take charge of a classroom. As noted
in the Introduction of Understanding Learning and Development, neuroscience has made
great strides into the discipline of education and our understanding of human development
while also providing teachers with new understandings of learning. Chapter 2 continues
this journey into understanding learning by exploring the important links between human
development and learning.

CHAPTER SUMMARY
This chapter opened with the question ‘what is learning?’ This approach provided you with
an opportunity to look at learning as both a product and process and draw an understanding
of the differences between each. This led to an exploration of the subtle differences between
teaching and learning and a brief history of each in Western school settings, underpinned

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 25 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 26 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

by the claim that some current practices of ‘education’ do not align well with a number of
theories of learning, particularly as they relate to contemporary students. In order to support
such a claim a number of prominent orientations, or theoretical perspectives, of learning
were presented. It is important to reiterate that there is a vast number of theories of learning;
those that have been explored represent a select group that, to date, have and continue to
have prominence in educational practice. Various aspects of behaviourist, cognitive, human-
istic, social cognitive and constructivist orientations to learning are likely to play a part in
your career as a teacher and a broad overview of each was offered to assist in your develop-
ment as a teacher.

Implications for teaching

As noted early in the chapter, many generations of students experienced a factory-line
approach to being educated. For many years students were viewed as tabula rasa, a Latin term
meaning ‘blank slate’, and the role of a teacher was to fill that empty void with the knowl-
edge that was deemed important at the time. From the 1970s onward, researchers began to
articulate aspects of learning as a process as much as a product. Concurrently, the advent of
technology which has given rise to an age of seemingly endless information calls into question
the need or actual possibility of pouring a continuing exponential growth of information and/
or knowledge into the heads of students. For some researchers and theorists there is still a
worrying trend, at a systemic level, to perpetuate a factory model through the continued use of
standardised testing and many other artefacts of twentieth-century schooling. The issues with
standardised tests are covered in Chapter 10 but foreshadowed here as an example of some-
thing you may have personally experienced and might now question as a valid mechanism
for determining any degree of learning. Indeed, one important question for you to continually
reflect on in your personal practice is ‘am I teaching the way I was taught?’
This question is an important one; like standardised tests, it is explored in more detail in
Chapter 10 under the term ‘apprenticeship of observation’ (Lortie, 1975). At this stage, after
working through this chapter, it is important to keep this phrase in mind as you explore the
following questions.

Ask yourself…
1 After working through the chapter, has the definition of learning that you were asked
to write at the beginning of the chapter changed? If so, how?
2 Given your experiences as a student, have there been times when you felt your
­learning was enhanced or optimised? If so, under what conditions did this occur?

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 26 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 1  WHAT IS LEARNING? 27

PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES
1 While on practicum, document the methods used to determine when or how learning has occurred.
List all of these in one of two columns in a table under the headings ‘Product’ and ‘Process’. Is one
column larger than the other and, if so, what does that indicate to you? Could you design different
ways to determine what, if any, learning has occurred?
2 While on practicum, jot down any examples of particular theoretical approaches to learning that
you observe during the course of your practicum. Are some theories more apparent than others?
Do some approaches resonate better with your own beliefs about learning and, if so, how might you
engage with such approaches as a teacher?

STUDY QUESTIONS
1 What are the five broad theoretical orientations presented in the chapter? Note the main focus of
each.
2 What is the difference between positive and negative reinforcement? List some examples of each in
a classroom context.
3 What are the five levels of the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs? List some ways in which you might be
able to help students meet basic and psychological needs at school.
4 Social learning theory is important in terms of behaviour and learning. What does this theory mean
for you as a future teacher and potential role model for your students?
5 What are the primary differences between cognitive constructivism and social constructivism?
­Provide examples of each in relation to educational and pedagogical contexts.

FURTHER READING
Blakemore, S. J. & Frith, U. (2005). The Learning Brain: Lessons for Education. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Claxton, G. (1999). Wise Up: The Challenge of Lifelong Learning. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers
Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and
School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Jorg, T., Davis, B. & Nickmans, G. (2007). Towards a new, complexity science of learning and education.
­Educational Researcher Review, 2(2), 145–156.
Lee, H. S. & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student learning: What has instruction got to do with it? Annual Review of
Psychology, 64, 445–469.
Martinez, M. E. (2010). Learning and Cognition: The Design of the Mind. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative (2nd ed.). West Sussex, UK: Capstone Publishing.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, Brain, and Education Science: A Comprehensive Guide to the New
­Brain-Based Learning. New York: W.W. Norton.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 27 10/08/2016 12:37 pm
 28 UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING

VIDEO LINKS
Crash Course: The Bobo Beatdown—Crash Course Psychology #12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128Ts5r9NRE
A succinct clip highlighting the impact of Albert Bandura’s work on our understanding of behaviour and
learning with a look at interesting learning concepts associated with his work.
Study.com: Constructivism: Overview and Practical Teaching Examples
http://study.com/academy/lesson/constructivism-overview-practical-teaching-examples.html
A concise look at constructivism and its application within classrooms.

WEBLINKS
Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning http://cte.illinois.edu/resources/topics.html
A useful website with a number of links to theoretical and practical resources and ideas for the
­classroom.
Framework for 21st Century Learning http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Although it is based in the United States with a view to enhancing educational structures and practices
there, this site offers resources and ideas for engaging learners through contemporary understandings
of learning, society and culture.

Oxford University Press Sample Chapter

01_NAG_LAL_19655_TXT_SI.indd 28 10/08/2016 12:37 pm