0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views

Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 3 - Design Oriented To Objects and Components

The document provides guidance for a university course activity on designing systems oriented towards objects and components. It describes the activity, including its evaluation rubric, topics, steps, and tasks. The activity involves designing an information system for a company based on its organizational chart and processes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views

Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 3 - Design Oriented To Objects and Components

The document provides guidance for a university course activity on designing systems oriented towards objects and components. It describes the activity, including its evaluation rubric, topics, steps, and tasks. The activity involves designing an information system for a company based on its organizational chart and processes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector


Activities guide and evaluation rubric - Step 3 - Design oriented to
objects and components

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería


Academic Unit
Academic Level Profesional

Academic Field Formación disciplinar

Course Name Diseño de Sistemas


Course Code 301309
Course Type theoretical Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enabled
Number of Credits 2

2. Description of the activity


Type of the Individu Number
☐ Collaborative ☒ 6
activity: al of weeks
Unit
Moment of Intermediate
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: :
2
Evaluative score of the Delivery Environment of the activity:
activity: 175 Monitoring and evaluation environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
Octubre 21, 2020 Noviembre 30, 2020
Competence to develop:
The student applies the concepts in the development of patterns, interfaces
and the properties that they must fulfill, in order to deliver a proposal.
The student models problems through the creation of the architecture and
the components of an information system, based on formal and functional
specifications of the system.

Topics to develop:
 User interface design
 Pattern-based design
 Webapps design
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
Understand the basic concepts of design and its components.
Develop the architectural design for an information system.
Develop the design at the component level to an information system.
Activities to develop
The company whose organization chart corresponds to the attached graph,

is a company that is dedicated to advising, sales and maintenance of


technological products additionally develops office applications and web
applications for its customers.
The company consists of the areas of Accounting, Technology and
Creativity, Human Talent, Production and Marketing and Sales. In each of
the areas there are sub areas of support for the development of each of
their processes.
Currently the company works a fairly simple application where there is no
backup of the information stored on the hard drives. The board of
directors, when meeting monthly, requests information from the general
manager, who in turn requests information from the persons in charge of
each of the areas.
The board of directors has decided to apply reengineering to its information
system and therefore will support in its small group as engineers to provide
the necessary support in this process. To do this, you must perform:
Continue with the selected area of the activity phase 2 - Concepts and
basic design principles.
1. Based on the component diagram, determine according to the
component which variables can participate in the process.
2. According to the variables that were established according to the
component diagram, design an interface model Perform the design of
architectural patterns.
3. Make the pattern diagram where all the elements of the interface are
detailed
Element
 
name
Description  

Details  
Navigation
 
elements

4. According to the interface, perform the hypermedia design oriented


to objects.

Environme
Knowledge environment
nt for the
Collaborative Learning Environment
developme
Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
nt
Individual:
Present in the forum the contributions corresponding to the
development of the activity, having previously stated the
Products to
area of work to which the design will be made.
deliver by
Collaborative:
student
1. Present your opinion regarding the points resolved by
your small group colleagues.
2. Consolidate the contributions of the members of the small
group apply APA standards to the document.
(Http://normasapa.net/2017-edicion-6/)
3. The document must be in PDF format and must contain:
a) Introduction.
b) General objectives and specific objectives
c) Consolidation of contributions.
d) Conclusions
e) Bibliographic references.
.

General guidelines for the collaborative work


Planning of In the development of collaborative work by students,
activities for some key elements are required that lead to a
the comprehensive, responsible and effective academic
development exercise.
of For this to be achieved it is necessary that they comply
collaborative with the steps indicated in the document entitled "General
work guidelines of the UNAD curriculum / Aspects of
collaborative work and teaching accompaniment" (Abadía,
Vela, Montero & Vargas, 2014, p. 16-18):
1. Recognition of actors: At the beginning of each
evaluation activity, the student will be recognized as an
actor of the group, presenting their strengths and
exposing the communication channels to be effective their
interaction.
2. Assignment of roles: Each member of the group will
assume one of the indicated roles, which will perform
functionally during the realization of collaborative work. It
is suggested to rotate roles in each of the activities, thus
promoting an integral formation of all the participants of
the group.
3. Planning of the academic activities: The planning of the
activities becomes a key element for the achievement of
the task. The group will carry out an academic work plan
for the development of the activity, based on the
analytical reflection of the activities agenda, the
evaluation guide and rubric. They will perform the
required readings acquiring thematic appropriation.
4. Staging the principles of collaborative work: it is
important to internalize the principles of interaction,
growth and responsible action, to ensure the excellent
development of your learning process and presentation of
written products that correspond to the quality of what is
requested in the course.
5. Active participation: a proactive participation with
relevant individual contributions is required for the
construction of a product that accounts for what is
requested in the activity guide.
Each student will choose one of the five roles specified in
the box below and will assume responsibility in a
responsible manner so that the participation in the
collaborative work is relevant, active with assertive
communication and achieve the construction of the
collaborative products requested and within the
Roles to
established times.
perform by
The document "General guidelines of the curriculum in
the student in
UNAD / Aspects of collaborative work and teaching
the
accompaniment" (ABADIA and others: 2014), p. 11,
collaborative
establishes the following roles for the accomplishment of
group
the collaborative works of the course:
a) Compiler
b) Reviser.
c) Evaluator
d) Deliveries.
e) Alerts.
Roles and The roles that are established in the UNAD for
responsibility collaborative works are related. It is important to assume
for the it responsibly, but without leaving your commitment as a
delivery of student to the development of the activity.
products by Compiler: Consolidate the document that is constituted
students as the final product of the debate, taking into account
that the contributions of all the participants have been
included and that only the participants who participated in
the process are included. You must inform the person in
charge of the alerts to notify those who did not
participate, that they will not be included in the product to
be delivered.
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
rules for submission of work required by the teacher.
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the person
in charge of the alerts so that you inform the other
members of the team in case there is an adjustment to be
made on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert about the delivery times of the products
and send the document in the stipulated times, using the
resources destined for the shipment, and indicate to the
other colleagues that the delivery has been made.
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of the news in the work and inform the teacher
through the forum of work and the messaging of the
course, that the document has been sent.
Use of the APA standard, version 3 in Spanish
(Translation of version 6 in English):
The APA Standards are the most used style of
organization and presentation of information in the area
of social sciences. These are published under a Manual
Use of that allows you to have access to the ways in which a
references scientific article should be presented. You can find the
most relevant aspects of the sixth edition of the APA
Standards Manual, such as references, citations,
preparation and presentation of tables and figures,
headings and seriation, among others, by going to
http://normasapa.net/2017 -edition-6 /
Plagiarism What is plagiarism for the UNAD? Plagiarism is defined by
policy the dictionary of the Royal Academy as the action of
"copying in the substantial works of others, giving them
as their own." Therefore plagiarism is a serious fault: it is
the equivalent in the academic field, to theft. A student
who plagiarizes does not take his education seriously, and
does not respect the intellectual work of others.
There is no small plagiarism. If a student uses any portion
of another person's work, and does not document their
source, they are committing an act of plagiarism. Now, it
is evident that we all have the ideas of others when
presenting ours, and that our knowledge is based on the
knowledge of others. But when we rely on the work of
others, academic honesty requires that we explicitly
announce the fact that we are using an external source,
either by means of an appointment or by means of an
annotated paraphrase.
For UNAD, in agreement 029 of December 13, 2013,
article 99, the following are considered as offenses that
threaten the academic order, among others: literal e)
"Plagiarism, that is, present as your own Authorship of all
or part of a work, work, document or invention made by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or
missing references, or propose a citad where there is no
coincidence between it and the reference "; and literal f)
"Reproducing, or copying for profit, educational materials
or results of research products, which have intellectual
rights reserved for the University."
The academic sanctions that the student will face are the
following:
a) In the cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the
academic work or respective evaluation, the qualification
that will be imposed will be zero points (0.0) without
prejudice of the corresponding disciplinary sanction.
b) In the cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the
academic work whatever their nature, the qualification
that will be imposed will be zero point zero (0.0), without
prejudice of the corresponding disciplinary sanction.

4. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric
Individual Collaborative
Activity type: ☐ ☒
Activity Activity
Unit
Moment of the
Initial ☐ Intermediate ☒ Final ☐
evaluation
:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed Aspects activity Score
High score Media score Low score
Presents It presents Contributions Does not 25
contributions to the significant with little present points
construction of contributions significant contributions
collaborative work for the content for the
development construction
of the activity of work
(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
points) points) points)

Performs the
It does not
Perform an analysis area analysis Partially
present
to the study area. and performs solves the
contributions 25
According to that the task flow activity
of solution points
analysis, perform a diagram
task flow diagram.

(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0


points) points) points)

Based on the flow


chart, design an
Make the
interface where the Partially It does not
interface in a
task can be solved perform an perform the
satisfactory 25
by establishing a interface interface
way points
preliminary
distribution of the
information in the
interface (up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
points) points) points)

Perform Realiza
According to the No realiza el
object-oriented parcialmente
interface, perform diseño de
hypermedia el diseño de 25
the hypermedia hipermedio
design hipermedio points
design oriented to
objects.

(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0


points) points) points)
Assessed Aspect Performance levels of the collaborative Score
activity
High score Media score Low score
Make
Although Does not
substantial
there is participate in
contributions
Make contributions participation, the
to the
for the construction the construction 25
construction of
of the final contributions of the final points
the final
document lack deeper document
product
(Up to 25 (Up to 12 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The APA rules The APA
APA
apply in the standards are
regulations
Applies APA entire partially 25
do not apply
standards document applied points
(Up to 25 (Up to 12 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Present a
document with Present a
good document
Document
organization with some
lacking any
Structure of the final complying with errors in your 25
organization
document what was organization points
requested in or spelling
the guide
(Up to 25 (Up to 12 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 175

You might also like