Tutorial Ch26 Solution
Tutorial Ch26 Solution
Chapter 26
11. A ray of light impinges from air onto a block of ice (n = 1.309) at a 50.0° angle of
incidence. Assuming that this angle remains the same, find the difference θ2,ice -
θ2,water,water in the angles when the ice turns to water (n = 1.333).
11. REASONING The angle of refraction 2 is related to the angle of incidence 1 by Snell’s
law, n1 sin 1 n2 sin 2 (Equation 26.2), where n1 and n2 are, respectively the indices
of refraction of the incident and refracting media. For each case (ice and water), the
variables 1, n1 and n2, are known, so the angles of refraction can be determined.
SOLUTION The ray of light impinges from air (n1 = 1.000) onto either the ice or water at
an angle of incidence of 1 = 50.0. Using n2 = 1.309 for ice and n2 = 1.333 for water, we
find that the angles of refraction are
n1 sin 1 n1 sin 1
sin 2 = or 2 sin 1
n2 n2
The difference in the angles of refraction is 2, ice 2, water 35.8 0.7
13. The drawing shows a coin resting on the bottom of a beaker filled with an
unknown liquid. A ray of light from the coin travels to the surface of the liquid and is
refracted as it enters into the air. A person sees the ray as it skims just above the
surface of the liquid. How fast is the light traveling in the liquid?
SOLUTION From the drawing in the text, we see that the angle of incidence at the
liquid-air interface is
5.00 cm
1 tan 1 39.8
6.00 cm
The drawing also shows that the angle of refraction is 90.0°. Thus, according to
Snell's law (Equation 26.2: n1 sin 1 n2 sin 2 ), the index of refraction of the unknown
liquid is
From Equation 26.1 ( n c/v ), we find that the speed of light in the unknown liquid
is
19. A man in a boat is looking straight down at a fish in the water (n = 1.333) directly
beneath him. The fish is looking straight up at the man. They are equidistant from the
air/water interface. To the man, the fish appears to be 1.5 m beneath his eyes. To the
fish, how far above its eyes does the man appear to be?
distance of
n
h d h w d (1)
1
To the man, the fish appears to be a distance below the air-water interface that is
given by Equation 26.3 as d d 1/ nw . Thus, measured below the man’s eyes, the fish
appears to be located at a distance of
1
h d h d (2)
n w
Dividing Equation (1) by Equation (2) and using the fact that h = d, we find
n
h w d
h d 1 nw 1
nw (3)
h d 1 1 1
h d nw
n w
In Equation (3), h d is the distance we seek, and h d is given as 1.5 m. Thus,
we find
27. A glass is half-full of water, with a layer of oil (n = 1.47) floating on top. A ray of
light traveling downward through the oil is incident on the water at an angle of 71.4°.
Take the refraction index of water to be 1.333. (a) Determine the critical angle for the
oil-water interface. (b) Will the ray penetrate into the water?
27. REASONING The light ray traveling in the oil can only penetrate into the water if it does
not undergo total internal reflection at the boundary between the oil and the water.
Total internal reflection will occur if the angle of incidence θ = 71.4° is greater than the
critical angle θc for these two media. The critical angle is found from
n2
sin c (26.4)
n1
where n2 = 1.333 is the index of refraction of water (see Table 26.1), and n1 = 1.47 is
the index of refraction of the oil.
n 1.333
c sin 1 2 sin 1 65.1
n1 1.47
Comparing this result to θ = 71.4°, we see that the angle of incidence is greater than the
critical angle (θ > θc). Therefore, the ray of light will not enter the water ; it will instead
undergo total internal reflection within the oil.
33. The drawing shows a crystalline quartz (refractive index 1.544) with a rectangular
cross section. A ray of light strikes the slab at an incident angle of 1 = 34.0°, enters
the slab, and travels to point P. This slab is surrounded by a fluid with a refractive
index n. What is the maximum value of n such that total internal reflection occurs at
point P?
SOLUTION Using n for the refractive index of the fluid that surrounds the crystalline
quartz slab and nq for the refractive index of quartz and applying Snell’s law give
n
n sin 1 nq sin 2 or sin 2 sin 1 (1)
nq
But when equals the critical angle, we have from Equation 26.4 that
n
sin sin c (2)
nq
Squaring Equation (3), using the fact that sin22 + cos22 = 1, and substituting from
Equation (1), we obtain
Solving Equation (4) for n and using the value given in Table 26.1 for the refractive
index of crystalline quartz, we find
nq 1.544
n 1.35
1+sin 1 1+sin 34
2 2
43. A ray of sunlight is passing from diamond into crown glass; the angle of incidence
is 35.00°. The indices of refraction for the blue and red components of the ray are:
blue (ndiamond = 2.444, ncrown glass = 1.531), and red (ndiamond = 2.410, ncrown glass = 1.520).
Determine the angle between the refracted blue and red rays in the crown glass.
43. REASONING The angle of each refracted ray in the crown glass can be obtained from
Snell’s law (Equation 26.2) as ndiamond sin 1 = ncrown glass sin 2, where 1 is the angle of
incidence and 2 is the angle of refraction.
SOLUTION The angles of refraction for the red and blue rays are:
47. REASONING We can use Snell's law (Equation 26.2: n1 sin 1 n2 sin 2 ) at each face of
the prism. At the first interface where the ray enters the prism, n1 = 1.000 for air and n2 = ng
for glass. Thus, Snell's law gives
sin 55.0
1 sin 55.0 ng sin 2 or sin 2 (1)
ng
We will represent the angles of incidence and refraction at the second interface as
1 and 2 , respectively. Since the triangle is an equilateral triangle, the angle of incidence
at the second interface, where the ray emerges back into air, is 1 60.0 2 . Therefore,
at the second interface, where n1 = ng and n2 = 1.000, Snell’s law becomes
We can now use Equations (1) and (2) to determine the angles of refraction 2 at
which the red and violet rays emerge into the air from the prism.
Red Ray The index of refraction of flint glass at the wavelength of red light is
ng = 1.662. Therefore, using Equation (1), we can find the angle of refraction for the red ray
as it enters the prism:
sin 55.0
sin 2 0.493 or 2 sin 1 0.493 29.5
1.662
Substituting this value for 2 into Equation (2), we can find the angle of refraction at
which the red ray emerges from the prism:
sin 2 1.662 sin 60.0 29.5 0.844 or 2 sin 1 0.844 57.51
Violet Ray For violet light, the index of refraction for glass is ng = 1.698. Again
using Equation (1), we find
sin 55.0
sin 2 0.482 or 2 sin 1 0.482 28.8
1.698
sin 2 1.698 sin 60.0 28.8 0.880 or 2 sin 1 0.880 61.60
51. A camera is supplied with two interchangeable lenses, whose focal lengths are
30.0 and 150.0 mm. A woman whose height is 1.60 m stands 9.00 m in front of the
camera. What is the height (including sign) of her image on the image sensor, as
produced by (a) the 30.0-mm lens and (b) the 150.0-mm lens?
51. REASONING We can use the magnification equation (Equation 26.7) to determine the
image height hi. This equation is
We are given the object height ho and the object distance do. Thus, we need to begin by
finding the image distance di, for which we use the thin-lens equation (Equation 26.6):
1 1 1 1 1 1 do f fdo
or or di (26.6)
d o di f di f d o fdo do f
d 1 fdo f
hi ho i ho ho (1)
d d d f
o o o f do
SOLUTION
a. Using Equation (1), we find that the image height for the 35.0-mm lens is
f
30.0 103 m 0.00535 m
f d
hi ho 1.60 m
o
3
30.0 10 m 9.00 m
b. Using Equation (1), we find that the image height for the 150.0-mm lens is
f 150.0 103 m
f d
hi ho 1.60 m 0.0271 m
o
150.0 10 m 9.00 m
3
Both heights are negative because the images are inverted with respect to the object.
55. REASONING The height of the mountain’s image is given by the magnification equation
as hi = –hodi/do. To use this expression, however, we will need to know the image distance
di, which can be determined using the thin-lens equation. Knowing the image distance, we
can apply the expression for the image height directly to calculate the desired ratio.
1 1 1
(1)
di do f
For both pictures, the object distance do is very large compared to the focal length f.
Therefore, 1/do is negligible compared to 1/f, and the thin-lens equation indicates that di = f.
As a result, the magnification equation indicates that the image height is given by
ho di ho f
hi – – (2)
do do
Applying Equation (2) for the two pictures and noting that in each case the object
height ho and the focal length f are the same, we find
ho f
–
hi 5 km do 5 km do 14 km 14 km
2.8
hi 14 km ho f do 5.0 km
– 5 km
d o 14 km
61. An object is 15 cm in front of a diverging lens that has a focal length of -12 cm.
How far in front of the lens should the object be placed so that the size of its image is
reduced by a factor of 2.0?
d i2 1 d i1
– – (1)
d o2 2 d o1
This expression can be solved for do2. First, however, we must find a numerical
value for di1, and we must eliminate the variable di2.
SOLUTION
The image distance for case 1 can be found from the thin-lens equation [Equation
26.6: (1/ d o ) (1/ d i ) (1/ f ) ]. The problem statement gives the focal length as
f –12 cm . Since the object is 15 cm in front of the diverging lens, d o1 18 cm . Solving
for di1, we find
1 1 1 1 1
– - or di1 = -6.7 cm
di1 f do1 -12 cm 15 cm
where the minus sign indicates that the image is virtual. Solving Equation (1) for do2,
we have
d o1
d o2 2d i2 (2)
d i1
To eliminate di2 from this result, we note that the thin-lens equation applied to case
2 gives
2 f d o2 d o1 d o1
d o2 or d o2 f 2 f
d o2 f d i1 d i1
d 15 cm
do2 f 2 o1 1 (-12cm) 2 -6.7 cm 1 42 cm
di1