Scribd
Upload
17 views2 pages

Writing - Transitioning

Transitionting use of grammar

Uploaded by

Andrej Andrej
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views2 pages

Writing - Transitioning

Transitionting use of grammar

Uploaded by

Andrej Andrej
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Transitioning.

©
Also, in addition, further, besides, moreover, similarly, furthermore, as
To amplify or add
well

Like, similarly, in fact, just as, likewise, also, again, equally important,
To compare
in the same way

But, however, although, yet, on the other hand, unlike, in contrast,


To contrast
nevertheless, instead, conversely, despite, rather, nonetheless,
alternatively, in any event, even so

First, second, finally, then, during, now, next, later, before, at first,
To show sequence
after, simultaneously, following this, to begin with, initially, to begin,
subsequently

Above, inside, beyond, there, next to, below, beside, under


To show spatial
order

For instance, such as, namely, for example, in particular, that is,
To give examples
specifically

Because, as a result, consequently, thereby, accordingly, thus,


To show cause or
therefore, otherwise, so, under
logical connection

To conclude, after all, in short, furthermore, therefore, above all,


To emphasize or
definitely, in fact, certainly, especially, but also, that is, in other words,
conclude in brief, finally

For the most part, generally speaking, in general, ordinarily, usually,


To generalize
customarily, normally, as a rule, as usual, by and large, more often than
not, mostly

Original text: Revised:


As per the common law, courts have Under the common law, courts have
interpreted the term reasonable use by interpreted the term reasonable use by
considering (1) the nature of the property, and considering (1) the nature of the property, and
(2) any impairment caused by the use. (2) any impairment caused by the use. But,
Impairment does not include a decrease in the impairment does not include a decrease in the
property's value resulting from its usual or property's value resulting from its usual or
legitimate use. A claimant must prove that the legitimate use. In other words, a claimant
impairment is more than just wear and tear must prove that the impairment is more than
from regular use. In Hersey, the court held just wear and tear from regular use. In
that cutting trees for timber was a usual and Hersey, for example, the court held that
legitimate use for a wood lot. The court cutting trees for timber was a usual and
found that the defendant's use did not amount legitimate use for a wood lot. The court
to destruction of common property. The found that the defendant's use did not amount
defendant cut down nearly an acre of trees. to destruction of common property despite the
The acre was only a small proportion of the defendant cutting down nearly an acre of trees
woodlot. Hersey is an older case, nevertheless because the defendant cut only a small
the principle of reasonable use has been proportion of the woodlot. Hersey is an older
applied consistently for decades. case; nevertheless, the principle of reasonable
use has been applied consistently for decades.
However, unlike Hersey and the subsequent
cases, in our case the neighbour's plans do not Unlike Hersey and the subsequent cases, in
risk destroying the common property. The our case the neighbour's plans do not risk
neighbour proposes to build a small tree destroying the common property. Specifically,
house in the lower branches of the boundary the neighbour proposes to build a small tree
tree. Our client however complains that the house in the lower branches of the boundary
unsightly tree bordering her front yard will tree. Our client, however, complains that the
diminish her property value. Consequently unsightly tree bordering her front yard will
the question is therefore whether the diminish her property value. The question is,
defendant can prove a significant impact on therefore, whether the defendant can prove a
the value of her property in order to meet the significant impact on the value of her
test in Hersey. property in order to meet the test in Hersey.

Task: Original Task: Revise


Despite [1] early misgivings by some experts,
the national Child Support Guidelines have
proved to be an important legal advance.
However [2], some problems have arisen that
have significant implications for legislative
policy. [3] Some courts in different regions
of the country have permitted exceptions to
the guidelines, creating inconsistent
calculations. [4] Experts suspect these
inconsistencies in child support calculations
will have serious consequences for families
who change their province of residence and
might need to seek a variation of the original
order. And [5] provinces all have unique
child support enforcement regimes with
varying requirements, enforcement across
provincial barriers were, at one point [6],
difficult. However [7], collaboration between
the provinces has eliminated most of the
domestic inconsistency. Yet [8] the remaining
problem is inconsistent enforcement of
foreign child support orders creating
uncertainty at the international level with a
possible breakdown in important international
enforcement conventions. However [9],
whatever [10] the original concerns about the
guidelines, the overall effect has been positive
and the guidelines must not be abandoned.

You might also like