SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Quarter 2- Module 9
Economy, Society and Cultural Change

Department Of Education ● Republic Of The Philippines

Understanding Culture Society And Politics -Grade 11
Alternative Delivery Mode
Quarter 2- Module 9: Economy, Society And Cultural Change
First Edition, 2020

Republic Act 8293, Section 176 States That: No Copyright Shall Subsist In Any Work Of
The Government Of The Philippines. However, Prior Approval Of The Government Agency
Or Office Wherein The Work Is Created Shall Be Necessary For Exploitation Of Such Work
For Profit. Such Agency Or Office May, Among Other Things, Impose As A Condition The
Payment Of Royalties.

Borrowed Materials (I.E., Songs, Stories, Poems, Pictures, Photos, Brand Names,
Trademarks, Etc.) Included In This Book Are Owned By Their Respective Copyright Holders.
Every Effort Has Been Exerted To Locate And Seek Permission To Use These Materials
From Their Respective Copyright Owners. The Publisher And Authors Do Not Represent
Nor Claim Ownership Over Them.

Published By The Department Of Education

Secretary: Leonor Magtolisbriones, Phd
Undersecretary: Diosdado M. San Antonio, Phd
Assistant Secretary: Alma Ruby C. Torio, Phd

Development Team of the Module

Author: Alexis V. Larosa
Content Editor: Jennifer O. Pacamalan and Mark Chilou M. Omandac
Language Editor: Christina Blanca Niza R. Elarmo, PhD and Ma. Romila D. Uy
Proofreader : Janeth U. Sarsuelo
Illustrator: Eldefonso C. Lagulay
Layout Artists: Ivy O. Niñeza and Jun Rey G. Poblete
Development Team:
Chairperson: Dr. Arturo B. Bayocot, CESO III
Regional Director
Co-Chairpersons: Dr. Victor G. De Gracia Jr. CESO V
Assistant Regional Director
Jonathan S. dela Peña, PhD, CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
Rowena H. Para-on, PhD
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Mala Epra B. Magnaong, Chief ES, CLMD
Members: Neil A. Improgo, PhD, EPS-LRMS; Bienvenido U. Tagolimot, Jr., PhD, EPS-ADM;
Erlinda G. Dael, PhD, CID Chief; Ferminia M. Labis, EPS (AralingPanlipunan);
Celieto B. Magsayo, LRMS Manager; Loucile L. Paclar, Librarian II;
Kim Eric G. Lubguban, PDO II

Printed In The Philippines By

Department Of Education - Alternative Delivery Mode (Deped-ADM)
Office Address: Masterson Avenue, Upper Balulang, Zone 1, Cagayan De Oro City,
Cagayan De Oro, Lalawigan Ng Misamis Oriental
Telefax: (02) 634 – 1054 Or 634 – 1072
E-Mail Address: [email protected] / [email protected]

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

i
Understanding Culture, Society
And Politics
Quarter 2 – Module 9
Economy, Society And Cultural Change

This instructional
material was
collaboratively
developed and
reviewed by educators
from public and private
schools, colleges and
universities. We
encourage teachers
and other education
stakeholders to email
their feedback,
comments and
recommendations to
the Department of
Education at
[email protected]

We value your
feedback and
recommendations.
Department Of Education ● Republic Of The Philippines

ii

iii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Overview 1
General Instructions 1
Content 2
What I Need To Know 2
What I Know 2
Economy as Foundation of Social Life 3
What’s New: Activity 1 3-4
System of Stratification as Source of Inequalities 4-5
Caste System 5
What’s New: Activity 2 5
Class System 6
Social Mobility 6
What I Can Do: Activity 3 6-7
Key Concepts 7
Politics and Social Organization 8
Forms of Legitimacy 8-9
Power and Authority Key Differences 9
Origin of the Philippine Modern State 9 - 10
What’s More: Activity 4 10 - 11
What Is It: Throwback History 11 - 12

What I Have Learned: Activity 5

12

Assessment 13

Answer Key 14
Annex 1-Suggested Reading
Future Results of British Rule In India 15 – 18
References 19

iv
 OVERVIEW
Hello Dear Learners! Welcome To This Module On Economy, Society And
Cultural Change. This Module Deals With Activities That Could Help The Learners
To Explain The Context, Content, Processes And Consequences Of Socialization.
The Module Is Self – Instructional And Allows You To Learn In Your Own Space, At
Your Own Pace. So, Relax And Enjoy Learning.

To The Learners:

This Module Contains Training Materials And Activities For You To Finish.
You Are Required To Go Through A Series Of Learning Activities. If You Have
Questions, Don’t Hesitate To Ask Your Teacher For Assistance.
This Will Give You The Opportunity To Develop Your Knowledge, Hone Your
Skills, Behavior And Motivations Required In Understanding Culture And Politics.
You Need To Complete This Module Before You Can Perform The Next Module .

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Work through all the information and complete the activities in each
section.
Read information sheets and complete the activities. Suggested
references are included to supplement the materials provided in this
module.
Most probably, your teacher will also guide. He is there to support
you and show you the correct way to do things.
You will be given plenty of opportunities to ask questions.
Write all your answer in your activity notebook

1
 Lesson Economy,1 Society
1 And Cultural
9 Change

WHAT I NEED TO KNOW?

At the end of the lesson, you’re expected to:
Objectives:
After going through this module, you are expected to:
1. analyze economic organization and its impact on the
lives of people in the society;
2. Examine stratification from the functionalist and conflict
perspectives;
3. identify characteristics of the systems of stratification;

Before heading on to our lesson, let us first check what you already know.

WHAT I KNOW?
Instruction: Write your answer in your activity notebook.

True or false. Write t if the statement is true and f if the

statement is false.

1. Habitus is a combination of 3 capitals; capital constitution.

2. Class a position or rank of a person.
3. Habitus is the foundation of social life; importance of economic structure.
4. Caste system is social relations shape entire life.
5. According to max weber - status is the social differences based on economic
divisions.

2
Great job! Later we will see if your answers are correct by reading the rest of this
module.

WHAT’S IN?
THE ECONOMY AS FOUNDATION OF SOCIAL LIFE

The importance of economic structure karl marx, the father of

scientific socialism, famously stated in his a preface to a
critique of political economy the most controversial
assertion in sociology:
“in the social production of their life,
men enter into definite relations that
are indispensable and independent
of their will; these relations of
https://encryptedtbn0.gstati
c.com/images? production correspond to a definite stage of development of
q=tbn:ANd9GcR8LnOIz1tc
u_yJgqH6rzEnDwDisEGK_ their material forces of production. The sum total of these
ktckzRuyZQc8I2rTrx&s
relations of production constitutes the economic structure of
society—the real foundation, on which rises a legal and
political superstructure and to which correspond definite
forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of
material life determines the social, political and intellectual
life process in general. It is not the consciousness of men
that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social
being that determines their
consciousness”.

WHAT’S NEW?

ACTIVITY 1
Directions: Write your answer in your activity notebook.

Create a comic strip of how you perceive the difference between a wealthy family
(owner of a mall), middle class family (both parents are professionals), and poor
family (both parents are high school graduates)

3
 Middle Class Family

Poor Family

WHAT IS IT?
SYSTEM OF STRATIFICATION AS SOURCE OF INEQUALITIES

Some sociologists, however, extend the definition of class to include not only
access to the means of production like land, capital, and technologies but also
to the prestige attached to one’s social position. Some sociologists, however,
extend the definition of class to include not only access to the means of
production like land, capital, and technologies but also to the prestige attached
to one’s social position. Hence, some sociologists, writing along the Weberian
tradition, use the term stratification.

When regularly recognized social 4differences (of wealth, color, religion,

ethnicity or gender, for example) become ranked in some hierarchical manner,
sociologists talk about strata (Bruce and Yearly 2006, p. 290).
 Max weber defined class a category of individuals who:

1. Have in common a specific causal component of their

life chances in so far as
2. This component is represented exclusively by
economic interests in the possession of goods and
opportunities for income, and
3. It is represented under the conditions of the
commodity or labor market.”

https://encrypted-
tbn0.gstatic.com/images?
q=tbn:ANd9GcTAvcPbq3O7x2JWOdilu

“I believe that ownership of property is crucial to the definition of class. Where

class referred to social differences based on economic divisions and inequalities,
status designated the differentiation of groups in the “communal” Sphere in terms
of their social honor and social standing”. ---max weber

Caste System as a system of social stratification differs from class in its

rigidity and in the basis of legitimacy. It is also called a closed system in
contrast with the class system that is relatively open. Membership of castes is
ascribed rather than achieved, and social contact between castes is heavily
constrained and ritualized. Unlike in the class system, in the caste system the
positions of people are already determined at the moment they were born.

WHAT’S NEW?

ACTIVITY 2
Directions: Write your answer in your activity notebook.
Read the essay “the future results of british rule in india”
By karl max below and share your insights. Readings 1 at
the last part of this module. Answer the following questions below:

1. When does the caste system of a person in india determined?

______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

5
 2. According to karl max ““the most decisive impediment to india’s progress and
power is their caste system. Do you agree? Why or why not?
______________________________________________________________
____________________________________________
__________________

______________________________________________________________
WHAT IS IT?
CLASS SYSTEM

The Class system

As discussed earlier, under the class system, individuals are positioned
according to their access to the means of production and contribution to
productive labor. People with higher income tend to have children who also
have higher income. Parents who can afford to send their children to better
schools are promoting the future advantage of their children. To talk about
the class system is to talk about the ways in which individuals from a definite
family background can advance to a relatively better economic position than
their parents. In most class system, education has become the accepted
means to advance one’s social mobility.

Among filipino families, education is considered as the

“ticket to success.” This is supported by the theory of
education-based meritocracy proposed chiefly by
american sociologists daniel bell in the 1960s.

In this theory, education is supposed to be the great status

equalizer. Education provides much needed capital to
climb the economic ladder. Hence, many filipino families
will sacrifice anything for their children to finish a college
degree. This practice is based on the belief that our
society
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WCsOjy Is an “open” Society that allows the movement of
RhpeM/TUlvvAKTr7I/AAAAAAAAC
Co/AUiHAWZmGuU/s1600/daniel individuals from a lower class to a relatively higher
class. When people are allowed and are capable of moving from one stratum or
class to another class, it is called social mobility.

6
 Social mobility“signifies the movement of people between positions in a
system of social stratification. In modern societies this means the
movement of people between social classes is defined by occupational
scales. It may occur between generations (as when a girl born into a
working-class family achieves a middle-class occupation) or be the ups-
and downs of an individual career” (p. 283).- Bruce and Yearley (2006)

WHAT I CAN DO?

ACTIVITY 3
Directions: Write your answer in your activity notebook.
Differentiate me. At this point, give keywords that you can
associate and/ or differentiate from class and status

CLASS STATUS

1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.

KEY CONCEPT
Pierre bourdieu (1930–2002),
a french sociologist, who dealt
extensively with class
inequalities by arguing that
capital, in its classic marxist usage, does not refer
only to economic assets but also includes cultural,
symbolic, and social capital. Cultural capital refers to
the forms of knowledge, educational credentials, and
artistic taste that a person acquires from family
background, which give them higher status in society.
7
https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/
compressed.photo. goodreads.com/books/1480166440l /24851764.jpg
Social capital refers to resources based on group membership, relationships, and
networks of influence and support. Bourdieu (1984) described social capital as “the
aggregate of the actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of a
durable network of more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual
acquaintance and recognition.” In traditional societies, for instance, individuals are
recruited in a bureaucracy on the basis of blood relations. In his book distinction
(1984), Bourdieu refers to symbolic capital as “the acquisition of a reputation for
competence and an image of respectability and honourability…” (p. 291)

Politics

What does politics mean? Why does politics bear a negative connotation especially
when used by well known politicians, celebrities, and media practitioners? What is
the relationship between power and politics? Where does power lie? Who wields
power? Who seizes power? What does it mean to be political? What does it take to
be politicized? What are the possible ways in which politics and empowerment can
mean something meaningful and fruitful for the majority?

POLITICS AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION

All known societies are organized in ways that facilitate and maintain the everyday
life and culture of different social groups. This means that the morality made up of
norms, mores, and folkways that people live by are part of an organized system of
“ways of doing and mixing” Are ways of living in a world where each individual needs
to mix with other people. In other words, there are rules, unwritten or written, that
guide people’s ways of socializing. This way of inhabiting the world is conceptualized
as social relations. Power is a nominal term7 or another word we use to refer to social
relations. This means that the rules for relating socially are observed depending on
one’s position in society. This is why all social relations are power relations. This why
politics is not even choice that those who can get into. Politics is part and parcel of
social life. It shapes the way people live and die.
6
FORMS OF LEGITIMACY

German sociologist max weber identifies 3 types of legitimacy which concertize the
same in its various concrete forms:

1. Traditional Legitimacy (TL)

Tl is the kind of moral authority that keeps society together by virtue of custom
and habit. This type of legitimacy emphasizes the authority of tradition by virtue
of its historical practice by a particular group. This form of rule is understood as
historically accepted by its practitioners: “this is how we have always done
things.” Governments or forms of rule that are based on traditional legitimacy
are historically continuous such as monarchies and the traditional legitimacy of
customary law that govern tribal societies.
8
2. Charismatic Legitimacy (CL)
In his book “charisma and institution building,” Weber studies the transition of
power from one regime to another through the seizure of power or revolution.
He studies a dimension of regime change or revolution focusing on a
charismatic leader. He argues that seizure of power is often initiated by a
leader who questions traditional authority, brings together and leads followers
to oust the old regime and bring forth a new one. Fidel Castro of Cuba’s 1959
revolution, Mao Zedong of the 1949 Chinese revolution, Vladimir Lenin of the
1917 October Russian revolution. Other examples of charismatic leaders in
world history are Zapata, Khomeini, and Mandela. The charismatic leader is
often regarded as endowed with
Exceptional powers and superhuman qualities. Charisma is the quality of
political leaders whose individual characteristics set him apart from ordinary
people. Weber, however, highlights that the charismatic leader’s authority over
her followers can only be maintained and reinforced when solidified in political
institutions. This means that as a quality of a leader, charisma must itself
undergo institutionalization, the most effective of which are formal
bureaucracies or modern governments that have replaced the traditional and
hereditary rule of monarchs.
3. Rational-Legal Legitimacy (RLL)
Authority in this context derives from formal procedures of institutions. This is a
type of legitimacy that is based on a government’s capacity to use public
interest as the rationale for establishing and enforcing law and order. Rational-
legal legitimacy is therefore the basis of power and leadership of a government
that pledges to abide the law and wins consent from the people through public
trust. Modern states or governments premised on representative or
participative democracies are examples of the kind of authority that is derived
from rational-legal legitimacy. Betrayal of trust and culpable violation of the
constitution by a government official strips him or her of rational-legal authority.
This explains the phenomenon of presidents leaving their office due to public
clamor and/or people power.

POWER AND AUTHORITY KEY DIFFERENCES

ORIGINS OF THE PHILIPPINE MODERN STATE

9
 Modern principalia: “a continuity of leadership
recruitment from a tiny minority of elite
families and, in spite of “democratic”
Elections, members of these families get
elected again and again.” –dante simbulan

https://thephilbiznews.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/09/congress.jpg

The ruling elite or the plutocracy refers to any given society’s economic and political
elite. In this context, the melding of economic and political power is decisive in the
formation of the Philippine state and the different regimes or governments that have
historically made it up. In an ideal world, governance only requires political acumen
or the ability to wield political capital effectively. But the history of colonialism and
neo-colonialism has shaped the confluence of economic and political power in
shaping the life of a nation.

Each province in the Philippines is almost always ruled by political dynasties that
rule not only the political life, they also shape and control ordinary people’s economic
and social life.

WHAT’S MORE?
ACTIVITY 4
Directions: Write your answer in your activity notebook.

As i observed. List down below names of politicians in your

municipality/province/city and opposite their names is their positions.

Ex. Manuel Hipolito – mayor

Name elected position in politics

1. ____________________ - ________________________
2. ____________________ - ________________________
3. ____________________ - ________________________
4. ____________________ - ________________________
5. ____________________ - ________________________

Process questions:

1. Are there multiple positions occupied by the same clan/ relatives or families? Yes or
no

2. How are political dynasties formed and maintained?

3. Why do they get elected? Does winning elections any indicator of the people’s will?
10
 4. In such conditions, can there be genuine democracy?

Write a one paragraph essay how your involvement and participation in different types of
social groups influence your thoughts, attitudes, values and behavior.
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________.

WHAT IS IT?
Throwback in history
The Principalia is a product of spanish colonialism that
morphed into the modern principalia all throughout American
colonialism and neo-colonialism, up to the institution of the
modern Philippine state.
Caciquism is a system of rule introduced by the Spanish colonizers who ruled
the Philippines from 1571-1898. While leaders of Barangays and Datus already
existed in the social organization of the various regions in Luzon, Visayas, and
Mindanao before Spanish colonial rule, these sophisticated system of organization
was used by the Spanish colonizers against the colonized.
The Spanish colonizers introduced Caciquism or the rule of the cacique or
chief through local leaders like the datos and cabezas de barangay. In other words,
local chiefs were recruited to the Spanish colonial government as local collaborators.
They were compensated through the encomienda system, or land grants to local
caciques. The caciques then started to preserve and reinforce power through getting
more land which allowed them to make their constituents, the people, dependent on
them. This newly formed local elite group also served as tax collectors who extorted
money from the locals, partly for their use and part of it to be surrendered to their
spanish superiors.
In the Bonifacio-led 1896 katipunan revolution, the Principalia played a
counter-intuitive role. The 1896 revolution was inspired by the reform movement
initiated by the Ilustrados, they are intellectual segment of the Principalia who are
alienated from the practices and interests of this elite group. They are the young
intellectuals who studied in Europe a midst the Philippines’ colonization of Spain.
Their exposure to the literature on the enlightenment and the different revolutions in
the west, foremost of which is the french revolution, these alienated young
intellectuals would come home to the country to become propagandists of the reform
movement against Spanish colonialism. From this movement, the revolutionary
katipunan was born and eventually won the revolution against Spanish colonialism.
During the united states colonization of the Philippines, the campaign to pacify
revolutionary anti colonial forces ensued. The principalia during this period was
comprised of pro-american upper class Filipinos, who in December 12, 1900, came
together, all 125 of them, to organize the Federalista party. As part of the pacification
campaign, local Filipino elites were also appointed by Americans in different
positions in the bureaucracy culminating in the commonwealth period. This period
marked the institutionalization of the modern Principalia as pillars in the
11
establishment of state institutions in the so-called post-colonial period. This segment
of the Principalia has its roots from the land-owning Principalia that collaborated with
Spanish colonizers. This is how the modern Principalia became the local ruling elite
that occupy seats in local government units, congress, senate, and the Malacanang
palace. Contemporary Philippine politician’s preference for foreign investors,
partnerships with big business, and us military forces is a disposition that has its
historical roots in the making of the modern Principalia which now comprise the
modern Philippine state. The phenomenon of making profits out of one’s seat in
government or what is known as bureaucrat capitalism is a logical trajectory of
governance that was instituted during colonial rule, and whose substance and bases
(economic power based on land, and later on, entanglement with foreign interests)
have yet to be eliminated to make Philippine politics a practice of genuine
democracy.
WHAT I HAVE LEARNED?
ACTIVITY 5
Direction: Answer the processed questions cited in the basic
block list. Write your answer in your activity notebook.

1. Go to youtube.com and search any senate, congress, session on talk

about the partylist system: From teachers, farmers, workers, women.

Question: What are the legal parliamentarian struggles of these groups?

___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________.

2. What is good governance for me? What are the important social services
to be delivered by government? How do we ensure our right to social
services? How to achieve good governance? Create a vlog and upload to
your social media account tagging your teacher
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________.

3. Debate: Should we abolish the pork barrel system? (300 words only)
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

12
 ______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________.

ASSESSMENT
Directions: Identify what is asked in the following items.
Write your answers in your activity notebook.

…the majority and minority parties represent almost exclusively the

intelligentsia and what we would call the Philippine plutocracy, and that the
needy classes have no representation in these parties and for these reasons
they have neither voice nor vote, even only as minorities, in the formulation
of governmental policies…”
1.______

symbolic capital as “the acquisition of a reputation for competence and an

2. ______image of respectability and honorability…” (p. 291)

Among Filipino families, education is considered as the “ticket to success.”

3.______

“I believe that ownership of property is crucial to the definition of class.

Where class referred to social differences based on economic divisions and
inequalities, status designated the differentiation of groups in the “communal”
4. _____ sphere in terms of their social honor and social standing”.

“In the social production of their life, men enter into definite relations that are
indispensable and independent of their will; these relations of production
correspond to a definite stage of development of their material forces of
5._____ production.

13

1 2 3 4 5
Annex 1.

Congratulations!
You have completed your journey in this module. You did a great job!
It’s now time to go on to the next adventure…Good luck!

ANSWER KEY

14
 REFERENCES
A. BOOK
Maria Ella Atienza, Et. Al.Date.Understanding Culture, Society And Politics: Edition, C & E
Publishing Inc.

B. INTERNET SOURCES.
Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Error: Reference source not found

Https://Colnect.Com/En/Stamps/Stamp/469657-Juan_Sumulong_1875-1942-
Personalities_Portraits-Philippines

Https://Thephilbiznews.Com/Wp-Content/Uploads/2018/09/Congress.Jpg

Https://I.Grassets.Com/Images/S/Compressed.Photo.Goodreads.Com/Books/1480166440l/2
4851764.Jpg

Https://3.Bp.Blogspot.Com/_Wcsojyrhpem/Tulvvaktr7i/Aaaaaaaacco/Auihawzmguu/S1600/D
aniel%2Bbell.Jpg

Https://Encrypted-Tbn0.Gstatic.Com/Images?Q=Tbn:And9gctavcpbq3o7x2jwodilucf-
Gmtdfo8v2gq5uxumclpmute3es0&S

Https://Encrypted-Tbn0.Gstatic.Com/Images?Q=Tbn:And9gcr8lnoiz1tcu_-
Yjgqh6rzendwdisegk_Ktckzruyzqc8i2rtrx&S

15
 Annex 1
The Future Results Of British Rule In India
Works Of Karl Marx 1853

London, Friday, July 22, 1853

I propose in this letter to conclude my observations on india.

How came it that english supremacy was established in india? The paramount
power of the great mogul was broken by the mogul viceroys. The power of the
viceroys was broken by the mahrattas. The power of the mahrattas was broken by
the afghans, and while all were struggling against all, the briton rushed in and was
enabled to subdue them all. A country not only divided between mahommedan and
hindoo, but between tribe and tribe, between caste and caste; a society whose
framework was based on a sort of equilibrium, resulting from a. General repulsion
and constitutional exclusiveness between all its members. Such a country and such
a society, were they not the predestined prey of conquest? If we knew nothing of the
past history of hindostan, would there not be the one great and incontestable fact,
that even at this moment india is held in english thraldom by an indian army
maintained at the cost of india? India, then, could not escape the fate of being
conquered, and the whole of her past history, if it be anything, is the history of the
successive conquests she has undergone. Indian society has no history at all, at
least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive
intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and
unchanging society. The question, therefore, is not whether the english had a right to
conquer india, but whether we are to prefer india conquered by the turk, by the
persian, by the russian, to india conquered by the briton.
England has to fulfill a double mission in india: One destructive, the other
regenerating the annihilation of old asiatic society, and the laying the material
foundations of western society in asia.
Arabs, turks, tartars, moguls, who had successively overrun india, soon became
hindooized, the barbarian conquerors being, by an eternal law of history, conquered
themselves by the superior civilization of their subjects. The british were the first
conquerors superior, and therefore, inaccessible to hindoo civilization. They
16
destroyed it by breaking up the native communities, by uprooting the native industry,
and by levelling all that was great and elevated in the native society. The historic
pages of their rule in india report hardly anything beyond that destruction. The work
of regeneration hardly transpires through a heap of ruins. Nevertheless it has begun.
The political unity of india, more consolidated, and extending farther than it ever
did under the great moguls, was the first condition of its regeneration. That unity,
imposed by the british sword, will now be strengthened and perpetuated by the
electric telegraph. The native army, organized and trained by the british drill-
sergeant, was the sine qua non of indian self-emancipation, and of india ceasing to
be the prey of the first foreign intruder. The free press, introduced for the first time
into asiatic society, and managed principally by the common offspring of hindoos
and europeans, is a new and powerful agent of reconstruction. The zemindari and
ryotwar themselves, abominable as they are, involve two distinct forms of private
property in land — the great desideratum of asiatic society. From the indian natives,
reluctantly and sparingly educated at calcutta, under english superintendence, a
fresh class is springing up, endowed with the requirements for government and
imbued with european science. Steam has brought india into regular and rapid
communication with europe, has connected its chief ports with those of the whole
south-eastern ocean, and has revindicated it from the isolated position which was
the prime law of its stagnation. The day is not far distant when, by a combination of
railways and steam-vessels, the distance between england and india, measured by
time, will be shortened to eight days, and when that once fabulous country will thus
be actually annexed to the western world.
The ruling classes of great britain have had, till now, but an accidental, transitory
and exceptional interest in the progress of india. The aristocracy wanted to conquer
it, the moneyocracy to plunder it, and the millocracy to undersell it. But now the
tables are turned. The millocracy have discovered that the transformation of india
into a reproductive country has become of vital importance to them, and that, to that
end, it is necessary, above all, to gift her with means of irrigation and of internal
communication. They intend now drawing a net of railroads over india. And they will
do it. The results must be inappreciable.
It is notorious that the productive powers of india are paralysed by the utter want
of means for conveying and exchanging its various produce. Nowhere, more than in
india, do we meet with social destitution in the midst of natural plenty, for want of the
means of exchange. It was proved before a committee of the british house of
commons, which sat in 1848, that

“when grain was selling from 6/- to 8/- a quarter at khandesh, it was sold at 64/ to
70/- at poona, where the people were dying in the streets of famine, without the
possibility of gaining supplies from khandesh, because the clay-roads were
impracticable.”

The introduction of railroads may be easily made to subserve agricultural

purposes by the formation of tanks, where ground is required for embankment, and
by the conveyance of water along the different lines. Thus irrigation, the sine qua
non of farming in the east, might be greatly extended, and the frequently recurring
local famines, arising from the want of water, would be averted. The general
importance of railways, viewed under this head, must become evident, when we
remember that irrigated lands, even in the districts near ghauts, pay three times as
much in taxes, afford ten or twelve times as much employment, and yield twelve or
fifteen times as much profit, as the same area without irrigation.
17
 Railways will afford the means of diminishing the amount and the cost of the
military establishments. Col. Warren, town major of the fort st. William, stated before
a select committee of the house of commons:

“the practicability of receiving intelligence from distant parts of the country, in as

many hours as at present it requires days and even weeks, and of sending
instructions, with troops and stores, in the more brief period, are considerations
which cannot be too highly estimated. Troops could be kept at more distant and
healthier stations than at present, and much loss of life from sickness would by this
means be spared. Stores could not to the same extent he required at the various
depots, and. The loss by decay, and the destruction incidental to the climate, would
also be avoided. The number of troops might be diminished in direct proportion to
their effectiveness.”

We know that the municipal organization and the economical basis of the village
communities has been broken up, but their worst feature, the dissolution of society
into stereotype and disconnected atoms, has survived their vitality. The village
isolation produced the absence of roads in india, and the absence of roads
perpetuated the village isolation. On this plan a community existed with a given
scale of low conveniences, almost without intercourse with other villages, without the
desires and efforts indispensable to social advance. The british having broken up
this self-sufficient inertia of the villages, railways will provide the new want of
communication and intercourse. Besides,“one of the effects of the railway system
will he to bring into every village affected by it such knowledge of the contrivances
and appliances of other countries, and such means of obtaining them, as will first put
the hereditary and stipendiary village artisanship of india to full proof of its
capabilities, and then supply its defects.” (chapman, the cotton and commerce of
india [pp. 95-97].)
I know that the english millocracy intend to endow india with railways with the
exclusive view of extracting at diminished expenses the cotton and other raw
materials for their manufactures. But when you have once introduced machinery into
the locomotion of a country, which possesses iron and coals, you are unable to
withhold it from its fabrication. You cannot maintain a net of railways over an
immense country without introducing all those industrial processes necessary to
meet the immediate and current wants of railway locomotion, and out of which there
must grow the application of machinery to those branches of industry not
immediately connected with railways. The railway-system will therefore become, in
india, truly the forerunner of modern industry. This is the more certain as the hindoos
are allowed by british authorities themselves to possess particular aptitude. For
accommodating themselves to entirely new labor, and acquiring the requisite
knowledge of machinery. Ample proof of this fact is afforded by the capacities and
expertness of the native engineers in the calcutta mint, where they have been for
years employed in working the steam machinery, by the natives attached to the
several steam engines in the burdwan coal districts, and by other instances. Mr.
Campbell himself, greatly influenced as he is by the prejudices of the east india
company, is obliged to avow

“that the great mass of the indian people possesses a great industrial energy, is well
fitted to accumulate capital, and remarkable for a mathematical clearness of head
and talent for figures and exact sciences.” “their intellects,” He says, “are excellent.”

18
 Modern industry, resulting from the railway system, will dissolve the hereditary
divisions of labor, upon which rest the indian castes, those decisive impediments to
indian progress and indian power.
All the english bourgeoisie may be forced to do will neither emancipate nor
materially mend the social condition of the mass of the people, depending not only
on the development of the productive powers, but on their appropriation by the
people. But what they will not fail to do is to lay down the material premises for both.
Has the bourgeoisie ever done more? Has it ever effected a progress without
dragging individuals and people through blood and dirt, through misery and
degradation?
The indians will not reap the fruits of the new elements of society scattered among
them by the british bourgeoisie, till in great britain itself the now ruling classes shall
have been supplanted by the industrial proletariat, or till the hindoos themselves
shall have grown strong enough to throw off the english yoke altogether. At all
events, we may safely expect to see, at a more or less remote period, the
regeneration of that great and interesting country, whose gentle natives are, to use
the expression of prince soltykov, even in the most inferior classes, “plus fins et plus
adroits que les italiens” [more subtle and adroit than the italians], a whose
submission even is counterbalanced by a certain calm nobility, who, notwithstanding
their natural langor, have astonished the british officers by their bravery, whose
country has been the source of our languages, our religions, and who represent the
type of the ancient german in the jat, and the type of the ancient greek in the
brahmin.
I cannot part with the subject of india without some concluding remarks.
The profound hypocrisy and inherent barbarism of bourgeois civilization lies
unveiled before our eyes, turning from its home, where it assumes respectable
forms, to the colonies, where it goes naked. They are the defenders of property, but
did any revolutionary party ever originate agrarian revolutions like those in bengal, in
madras, and in bombay? Did they not, in india, to borrow an expression of. That
great robber, lord clive himself, resort to atrocious extortion, when simple corruption
could not keep pace with their rapacity? While they prated in europe about the
inviolable sanctity of the national debt, did they not confiscate in india the dividends
of the rajahs, 171 who had invested their private savings in the company’s own
funds? While they combatted the french revolution under the pretext of defending
“our holy religion,” Did they not forbid, at the same time, christianity to be propagated
in india, and did they not, in order to make money out of the pilgrims streaming to
the temples of orissa and bengal, take up the trade in the murder and prostitution
perpetrated in the temple of juggernaut? These are the men of “property, order,
family, and religion.”
17
The devastating effects of english industry, when contemplated with regard to
india, a country as vast as europe, and containing 150 millions of acres, are palpable
and confounding. But we must not forget that they are only the organic results of the
whole system of production as it is now constituted. That production rests on the
supreme rule of capital. The centralization of capital is essential to the existence of
capital as an independent power. The destructive influence of that centralization
upon the markets of the world does but reveal, in the most gigantic dimensions, the
inherent organic laws of political economy now at work in every civilized town. The
bourgeois period of history has to create the material basis of the new world — on
the one hand universal intercourse founded upon the mutual dependency of
mankind, and the means of that intercourse; on the other hand the development of
the productive powers of man and the transformation of material production into a
19
scientific domination of natural agencies. Bourgeois industry and commerce create
these material conditions of a new world in the same way as geological revolutions
have created the surface of the earth. When a great social revolution shall have
mastered the results of the bourgeois epoch, the market of the world and the
modern powers of production, and subjected them to the common control of the
most advanced peoples, then only will human progress cease to resemble that
hideous, pagan idol, who would not drink the nectar but from the skulls of the slain.

20
21