1) School adjustment requires students to develop both social and academic competencies like maintaining relationships, developing identities, and observing standards.
2) The document proposes defining school adjustment as achieving goals that promote social integration and positive self-development. Competence is context-specific effectiveness in meeting social and personal goals.
3) Social interactions can directly teach competencies and indirectly socialize goals and expectations, facilitating skill development. Relationships with teachers, peers, and parents socialize students.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
309 views
School Adjustment
1) School adjustment requires students to develop both social and academic competencies like maintaining relationships, developing identities, and observing standards.
2) The document proposes defining school adjustment as achieving goals that promote social integration and positive self-development. Competence is context-specific effectiveness in meeting social and personal goals.
3) Social interactions can directly teach competencies and indirectly socialize goals and expectations, facilitating skill development. Relationships with teachers, peers, and parents socialize students.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19
SOCIOCULTURAL, INSTRUCTIONAL,
AND RELATIONAL PROCESSES
School Adjustment INTRODUCTION
Being successful at school requires children to
perform a range of social as well as academic competencies to: Maintain and establish Mastering subject interpersonal matter relationships
Strive to develop social
Developing effective identities and a sense of learning strategies belongingness Observe and model Performing well on standards for tests performance displayed by others
behave in ways that are valued
by teachers and peers SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT AND EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Psychologically Speaking, children’s adjustment to
school is discussed in with respect to those social competencies that facilitate achievement of school-related objectives. Specifically, the focus is on school adjustment as defined by social motivation, behavioral competence, and positive interpersonal relationships. DEFINING SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT
S A is often used as a fairly generic term that refers
to any school-related outcome under investigation. Adjustment is with respect to the absence of negative or maladaptive student outcomes (Aggressive, Inattentive, or Disruptive behavior)
And in opposition to the presence of normative or
positive competencies (Cooperative, Compliant, or Self-regulated behavior). PROBLEMATIC
However, formal models have not been proposed
to guide our thinking about what healthy adjustment to school entails or how it develops and can be supported within the classroom environment. (Ladd, 1989). SOCIAL INTEGRATION… AN APPROCH FOR SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT An approach is proposed in which adjustment is defined as the achievement of goals that result in social integration, as well as those resulting in positive developmental outcomes for the self. “Socially integrative goals are desired outcomes that promote the smooth functioning of the social group, social approval, and social acceptance, whereas self- related goals are those that promote the achievement of personal competence, feelings of self- determination, and feelings of social and emotional well-being” (Bronfenbrenner, 1989; Ford, 1992).
Classroom competence is a highly context-specific
outcome reflecting the degree to which students are able to meet the demands of the classroom environment as well as achieve their own personal goals. PERSPECTIVES ON THE NATURE OF COMPETENCE 1. Bronfenbrenner (1989) argues that competence can only be understood in terms of contextspecific effectiveness, as reflected in mastery of culturally and socially defined tasks.
Therefore, competence is a product not only of
personal attributes such as goals, values, self regulatory skills, and cognitive abilities, but also of ways in which these attributes contribute to meeting situational requirements and demands. 2. A similar perspective to understand adjustment at school is found in the work of Connell and his colleagues (Connell & Wellborn, 1991; Deci & Ryan, 1991).
According to them, students will engage in positive
intellectual and social activities as well as experience a positive sense of self and emotional well-being when teachers provide structure (articulation of clear and consistent expectations), autonomy support (opportunities for personal choice and decision making), and involvement (individual attention). These conditions are believed to contribute to adjustment by enhancing students’ sense of competence, self-determination, and social relatedness. That is, feeling that one is an integral and valued part of the social group. Ford (1992) expands on Bronfenbrenner’s notion of person-environment fit by specifying four dimensions of competence: The achievement of personal goals
The achievement of goals that are situationally relevant
The use of appropriate
means to achieve these goals
Accomplishing goals that
result in positive developmental outcomes for the individual Applying Bronfenbrenner’s and Ford’s perspectives to classroom functioning suggests that students are competent and well-adjusted if several criteria are met.
First, students must be able to achieve goals that are
valued by themselves as well as by teachers and peers. Second, they must do so in ways that are sanctioned by the group. Third, goals must be accomplished in ways that set the stage for other positive outcomes such as healthy self-concept or increased interest in academics. Finally, the classroom context must provide the structure and support for students to accomplish these goals. SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON SCHOOL ADJUSTMENT
There are two general mechanisms whereby the
aspects of school adjustment discussed and might be influenced by interpersonal interactions and relationships. First, interactions with adults and peers can provide children directly with resources that promote the development of specific competencies via information and advice, modeled behavior, or specific experiences that facilitate learning (Sieber, 1979). Students frequently clarify and interpret their teacher’s instructions concerning what they should be doing and how they should do it. Second, social interactions can facilitate the development of intrapersonal outcomes related to the development of social and academic skills. Theoretical models of these indirect influences describe the socialization process as one of communicating goals and expectations for specific behavioral outcomes and then providing a context wherein these goals are learned and subsequently internalized (Steinberg, 1993; Goodnow, 1994). WHO SCIALIZES GENERATIONS ???
PARENTS TEACHERS
PEERS CONCLUSIONS AND PROVOCATIONS FOR THE ISSUE
Beyond these basic observations, however, many
interesting and provocative questions remain. In conclusion, therefore, several general issues in need of additional consideration and empirical investigation if educational psychologists are to make progress in understanding children’s adjustment to school. These issues concern: The expectations and goals we hold for our students
The role of developmental processes in choosing
these goals (and therefore in how we view healthy adjustment)
The development of more sophisticated models to
guide research on school adjustment, and research methods and designs.