MIS604 Assessment 1 Brief Requirments Elicitation Report Module Due 2.2 Final
MIS604 Assessment 1 Brief Requirments Elicitation Report Module Due 2.2 Final
Individual/Group Individual
Weighting 25%
Task Summary
This Assessment requires you to respond to a case study. The same case study will be used for all three
assessments so that you can develop insights into the different facets of Requirements Engineering.
For this assessment, you are required to produce an individual report of 1500 words (+/-10%) detailing a
requirements elicitation plan for the case organisation. The report should contain the following:
1. A Stakeholder Engagement Plan detailing:
a. Stakeholder list
b. Areas of influence and Power mapped on a Power/Interest Grid
c. Definitions of the stakeholder’s power and interest.
Context
Business Analysts work with organisations to improve organisational processes and systems. One of the most
important parts of a Business Analysts job is to elicit requirements from stakeholders so that there is a clear
understanding of what will be required from the new system. This requires a Business Analyst to understand
who their stakeholders are, how to engage with them and which elicitation methods to use. This assessment
aims to develop your knowledge and skills in this area and to lay down the foundation of knowledge for your
future professional practice.
Task Instructions
1. Please read the attached MIS604_Assessment_Case Study.
2. Write a 1500 words (+/-10%) requirements elicitation plan for the case organisation.
4. Plan how you will structure your ideas for your report and write a report plan before you start writing.
The report does not require an executive summary or abstract.
The conclusion (100-150 words) will summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts
forward regarding the concepts covered in the report.
6. The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading
and page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should
be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information
over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning.
7. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the
assignment. This will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.
Referencing
There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style and it is expected that students
reference any lecture notes used and five additional sources in the relevant subject area based on readings
and further research.
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more
information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions
Submit Assessment 1 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS604 Requirements
Engineering. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback
can be viewed in My Grades.
Knowledge and Lack of understanding of Limited understanding of Adequate knowledge or Thorough understanding of Highly developed
understanding the required concepts and required concepts and understanding of the the key concepts. understanding of the field
Stakeholder Plan knowledge. Key knowledge. Some of the key required concepts. A Discriminates between or discipline/s.
Power and Influence components of the components of the reasonable capacity to assertion of opinion and Systematically and critically
concepts and methods assignment are not assignment are not explain and apply relevant information substantiated discriminates between
Elicitation Activity addressed. Lack of addressed. Limited key concepts. Supports by robust evidence from assertion of opinion and
Planning application, and analysis application and analysis to opinion and information the research/course information substantiated
Elicitation methods and of information to provide provide clear substantiated by evidence materials and extended by robust evidence from
tools clear recommendations. recommendations. from research to provide reading. Well demonstrated the research/course
recommendations. capacity to apply and materials and extended
60% analyse relevant reading.
Recommendations are
Use of academic and Poorly written with Written according to Written according to Well-written and adheres to Expertly written and
discipline conventions informal tone, using first academic genre. Minor academic genre. Consistent the academic genre. Expert adheres to the academic
person pronouns. Does errors in the use of first- use of credible and relevant use of good quality, genre. Expert use of high-
Formal tone not adhere to the person pronouns. research sources to support credible and relevant quality credible and
Introduction, body and assignment brief of the and develop ideas. research sources to support relevant research sources
conclusion. requirements for a short Introduction attempted but and develop appropriate to support and develop
No use of first party business report. No very generic does not clearly Sound use of the arguments and statements. arguments and position
perspective introduction attempted. state the purpose of the introduction but does not Shows evidence of reading statements. Extensive
Appropriate use of Conclusion not report and what the reader clearly state either the beyond the key reading. evidence of reading beyond
credible resources, attempted. Inconsistent should expect to find in the purpose of the report or the key reading.
Correct citation of key and inadequate use of body of the report. what the reader should Good use of the
resources using APA good quality, credible and Conclusion attempted but expect to find in the body introduction which clearly Excellent use of the
style of referencing, in- relevant resources to does not include summation of the report. Sound use of states the purpose of the introduction which secures
text as well as for support and develop of key concepts discussed in the conclusion and report and what the reader the attention of the reader,
models, diagrams, ideas. No use of in-text the report and/or key succeeds in either the should expect to find in the clearly states the purpose
tables or tools. references, or no conclusions or summation of key concepts body of the report. Good and what the reader should
reference list at the close recommendations. discussed, or key use of the conclusion and expect to find in the body
25% of the report. Many Consistent use of credible conclusions or succeeds in summation of of the report. Excellent use
mistakes in using the APA and relevant research recommendations, but not key concepts discussed and of the conclusion. Succeeds
style. sources to support and both. key conclusions or in confident summation of
develop ideas, but these are recommendations. key concepts and
not always explicit or well Good use of in-text conclusions. Gives the
developed. Little use of in- referencing and Very good use of in-text reader a clear sense of next
text referencing, or appropriate number of referencing. All in-text steps required. Excellent
inadequate references references used and listed references match with and meticulous use of in-
consulted and added to in the reference list. There references listed in the text referencing with
references at the close of the are only minor errors in reference list. No mistakes references listed in the
report. Some mistakes in using the APA style. in using the APA style. reference list. No mistakes
using APA style. in using the APA style.