12 Psychology - Instructions For Practical File and Case Profile
12 Psychology - Instructions For Practical File and Case Profile
Each student is required to make one practical file and one case profile .The practical file will
consist of an introduction to psychological testing followed by 5 practicals .The students are
required to follow the instructions below and submit both files as and when asked to do so.
Francis Galton (1822-1911) was the first scientist to undertake systematic and statistical
investigation of individual differences. He was preceded by other psychologists who were either
concerned with problem of dualism of mind and matter or general problems and theories rather
than individual differences.
Ernst Heinrich (1795-1878), educated as an anatomist and physiologist had quantitative
experimental approach to psychological problems. He experimented on weight discrimination,
vision, hearing etc.
Gustav Theodor Fechner (1801-87) who started his career in physics and chemistry was more
concerned about the application of exact methods of natural science to the study of inner world
i.e. the relation of mental processes to physical phenomenon.
J. Muller (1801-58), a professor of physiology was especially interested in the physiology of the
senses and in reflex action and did significant experiments in space perception.
Alexander Bain (1818-1903) a professor of logic, mental philosophy and English literature in
Aberdeen University, utilized, organised and interpreted the works of Weber and Fechner and
tried to put them in application.
Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) established the first lab of psychology in 1879 at Leipzing, Germany.
He employed physiological methods and introspection in his research.
Jean Esquirol (1772-1840) made the explicit distinction between mental illness and mental
deficiency. He also differentiated among the several levels of mental deficiency. He tried to
differentiate them on the basis of physical measurements, especially size and formation of the
skull but was not successful. He also said that development and use of language is one of the
most useful and valid criteria for differentiating levels of mental deficiency.
On the other hand, Senguin (1812-80) developed methods in the training of mental defectives. His
methods emphasized the development of greater sensory sensitivity and discrimination and of
improved motor control and utilization.
The term mental test was first employed by McKean Cattell in a publication of 1890. Cattell tests
were of memory, imagery, hearing, colour vision, reaction time etc.
Binet and Simon (1905) developed the first standard scale of intelligence to differentiate among
three levels of mental deficiency- moron, imbecile and idiot.
Shortly after 1916 the most significant occurrence in psychological testing was the development of
group tests. During World war I government wanted to recruit individuals in army by means of
psychological methods. So, two group tests were developed Alpha Verbal Test and Beta Non
verbal Test. This led to the use of psychological tests in various fields. Aptitude testing also
IMPORTANT CONCEPTS
EXPERIMENT- A carefully controlled scientific procedure conducted to determine whether
certain variables manipulated by the experimenter have an effect on other variables
HYPOTHESIS- A possible explanation for a behaviour being studied that can be answered by an
experiment or a series of observation. It can also be defined as tentative answer to a problem.
VARIABLES- Factors that can be varied and can assume more than one value.
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE- A variable that is controlled by the experimenter and is applied to
the participants to determine its effect.
DEPENDENT VARIABLE- A measurable behaviour that is exhibited by a participant and is
affected by the independent variable.
CONTROL GROUP- The group in which participants are treated identically to participate in the
experimental condition, except that the independent variable is not applied to them.
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP- The group in which independent variable is introduced
STANDARDIZATION- The procedures are specified precisely, so that different testers will
follow the same procedures when they administer the same test to different subjects this means
that test performance of different people or the same persons at different times or occasions can
be compared directly.
OBJECTIVITY- Objectivity refers to the fact that if two or more researchers administer a
psychological test on the same group of people, both of them would come up with more or less
the same values for each person in the group. The items convey the same meaning to everyone.
Specific instructions and the procedure for administering the test are specified. The impact of
personal bias is kept under control.
RELIABILITY- It refers to the consistency of the scores obtained by an individual on the same
test on two different occasions.
Types of Reliability
Test Retest reliability- it is computed by finding co-efficient of correlation between the two sets of
scores on the same set of persons. It indicates the temporal stability or stability of the test scores
over time.
Split Half Reliability-It gives an indication about the degree of internal consistency of the test. The
test is divided into two equal halves employing odd even method.
VALIDITY- It refers to the extent to which the test measures what it is suppose to measure.
NORMS- Norm is an average score on a particular test made by a specific population. Reference
to a test table of norms enables us to rank an individuals performance relative to his own age
group.
STANDARDISED INSTRUCTIONS
Standardized instructions are given in the manual. The tester gives these instructions only to
maintain the uniformity.
UNIFORMITY IN CONDUCTION - The tester conducts the test in a uniform way irrespective of
their culture.
USES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
• These are used primarily for analysis and determination of individual differences in
general intelligence, aptitude, personality traits etc.
OBSERVATION
It is an effective method of describing behaviour. Witnessing an event and recording.
STEPS OF OBSERVATION
a) Selection- Psychologists select a particular behaviour for observation e.g. One may be
interested to know how children behaviour behave on their first day in school.
b) B) Recording- the researcher records the selected behaviour using different means such as
marking tallies for a behaviour, taking notes describing each activity in detail.
c) Analysis of data- Psychologists analyzes whatever they have recorded to derive meaning
out of it.
TYPES OF OBSERVATION
NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION- This refers to observations done in natural and real life
settings. The observer makes no effort to control or manipulate the situation. This type of
observation is conducted in schools and hospitals.
Controlled observation- this type of observation is doe in laboratory experiments.
Participant observation- In this type of observation the observer becomes a part of the group
being observed.
Non- Participant Observation- In this type of observation, group or people are observed from a
distance or through a camera.
SURVEY METHOD
It is a technique for sampling a wide variety of behaviour and attitude e.g. finding out the attitude
of people towards family planning. The survey research uses different techniques like interviews,
questionnaires and observations etc.
It can also be used to predict behaviour. Researcher must be careful in choosing the sample.
Advantage- It enables researcher to describe the characteristics of relatively small sample and the
generalize that information to a larger population
INTERVIEW
It refers to a face to face conversation with a purpose to derive factual information, opinions and
attitudes etc. there can be two broad types of interviews- structured or standardized and
unstructured or non-standardized. A structured interview is the one in where the questions in the
schedule are written clearly in a sequence. In an unstructured interview the interviewer has the
flexibility to take decisions about the questions to be asked; the wordings of the questions and the
sequence in which the questions are to be asked. Questions can be either open ended or closed
ended. Closed ended questions have specified responses. Open ended questions can be answered
the way respondent wants to.
CASE STUDY
It refers to in-depth study of a particular case. The case can be an individual with distinguishing
characteristics or a small group of individuals having some commonality among them,
institutions and specific events. A case study employs multiple methods for collecting
information such as interview, observation and psychological tests. It provides in depth
information about a person’s life but at the same time validity in single case is quite challenging
CORRELATION STUDIES
Correlational studies are done to find relationships between variables for prediction purposes.
The strength and direction of the relationship ids determined y correlational coefficient and its
value can range from +1.0 to -1.0. The coefficient of correlation is of three types- positive, negative
QUESTIONNAIRE
It consists of predetermined set of questions. The respondent has to read the questions and mark
the answers on the paper. Both open ended and closed ended questions can be used in the
questionnaire. The questionnaire is mainly used for collecting background and demographic
information, attitudes and opinions, knowledge about a particular topic. It is the most common,
simple and low cost self report method of collecting information.
PERCENTILE RANK
An individual’s percentile rank on a test designates the percentage of cases or scores lying below
it. E.g. P-20 means the individual is situated above 20 percent of the group fall below this persons
rank.
DECILE RANK
It designates the one tenth part of the group in which any tested person is placed by his score. E.g.
A testee who has a decile rank of 10 is located in the highest 10 percent of the groups. It is used
when the number of scores in a distribution is small.
STANINE – According to this method the standard population is divided into 9 groups. Stanine 1
is the lowest and stanine 9 is the highest.
• Index
• Historical background of psychological testing
• Important concepts
• Standard Progressive Matrices
• David’s Battery Of Differential Abilities
• Maudsley Personality Inventory
• Global Adjustment Scale
• Self Concept Questionnaire
• TITLE
• OBJECTIVE
• BASIC CONCEPT
• METHOD
*Preliminary Information
* Testing Material
*Description of the Test-name author, psychometric properties
* Procedure
#Rapport formation
#Instructions
#Precautions
#Test Administration
#Verbal Report
#Behavioural observation
#Scoring
• RESULTS
• ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
• CONCLUSIONS
• REFERENCES
2. ONE CASE PROFILE- the case profile will include developmental history of the subject
using both qualitative and quanititative methods. Qualitative methods include
observation, interview etc. The main objective of preparing a case profile is to understand
the individual in totality. The students have to prepare a case profile of an immediate
family member i.e. father,mother or any sibling. They may be encouraged to find out the
background information and developmental history of the individual.
1. OBJECTIVE:
To measure eductive component of “ g” as defined in Spearman’s Two Factor
theory using Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices.
2. BASIC CONCEPT
2.1 INTELLIGENCE
Oxford Dictionary explains intelligence as the power of perceiving, learning, understanding
and knowing.
Binet defined intelligence as the ability to understand well, reason well and judge well.
According to Weschler, intelligence can be defined as the global and aggregate capacity of an
individual to think rationally, act purposefully and to deal effectively with his environment.
Gardner and Sternberg have suggested that an intelligent individual not only adapts to the
environment but also actively shapes it
According to Robert Sternberg, Intelligence is the ability to adapt, to shape and to select
environment to accomplish one’s goals and those of one’s society and culture.
The psychometric approaches express the individual’s performance in terms of a single index
of cognitive abilities. On the other hand information processing approach describes the
processes people use in intellectual reasoning and problem solving.
INDIVIDUAL GROUP
It can be administered to one person at a It can be administered to several people
time simultaneously
It requires the test administrator to Group tests do not allow such opportunity
establish a rapport with the subject and be to be familiar with subjects feelings.
sensitive to his/her feelings, moods and
expressions during the testing session.
It allows people to answer orally or in Group tests generally seek written answers
written form or manipulate objects as per usually in a multiple choice format
the tester’s instructions.
Eg. Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Eg. Ravens Standard Progressive Matrices
3. METHOD
3.1 Preliminary Information
Name
Date of Birth
Age
Sex
Class
Date of conduction
Place of conduction
RELIABILITY- Over forty studies dealing with the reliability of the SPM have been reported in
the literature. They cover very wide range, many cultural groups and clinical as well as normal
populations. Results have been sum up in the table 1.1
Table 1.1- Retest reliability and Interco relation of the Standard Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill
Vocabulary Scale at different ages
VALIDITY- The concurrent and predictive validities of the SPM vary with the age, sex, the
homogeneity of the sample and the conceptual relevance of the criterion to which the SPM will be
related and the quality of its assessment.
For English speaking children and adolescents, reliable correlation of SPM with the Binet and
Wechsler Scales range from .54 to .86 ( Raven,1948;Taibl, 1951; Banks and Sinha,1951)Some
American studies with adults have yielded very high correlations between SPM and WAIS Scores
( Burke and Bingham,1966;Sheppard et al. 1968)
3.4 Procedure
3.4.2 Instructions
i) Here is a test booklet and a separate answer sheet on which you will record
your answers.
ii) Please ensure that you do not write anything on the test booklet.
iii) Please enter the required information i.e. Name, Age etc in the answer sheet.
iv) Now open the first page of the test booklet to find problem A 1. Now locate the
column of the numbers 1 to 12 under the heading Set A on your answer sheet.
v) Now look at problem A1. The upper portion of the page has a pattern with a
piece cut out of it. Select the one piece from the six options given below the
pattern that you think is right as it fits into the pattern. What would be the
answer? ( wait for the subject to respond) Number 4 as you said is the right
piece, so the answer is number 4. You will now write 4 next to the number 1
under the heading set A on the answer sheet.
vi) Similarly on every page of the booklet, there is a pattern with a portion
missing. You have to choose the right piece out of the options given below the
pattern. Immediately after deciding on the right option, you must write the
option number next to the item number on the answer sheet.
vii) The problems are simple in the beginning and get harder as you progress.
Attempt all problems. If you are not sure about a particular answer you may
make a guess but don’t leave any item unanswered.
viii) Make sure that you record the answers in the right column of the answer sheet.
ix) There is no time limit but try to finish as soon as possible.
3.4.7 Scoring
Scoring is done by hand, with the help of a scoring key. Right answers are given 1 mark and
wrong answers are given zero. Then all the marks for each column are added. Thereafter, a
single score is obtained by adding the total scores of the five columns. The percentile score
and grade corresponding to this are noted down from the manual for analysis.
Discrepancy score - The difference between the score a person obtains on each set and that
normally expected for his total score is called the discrepancy score shown numerically as 0, -
1, +2, -2, +1 . If a person’s score on one of the sets deviates by more than 2, his total score on
the scale cannot be expected at its face value as a consistent estimate of his general capacity
for intellectual activity. However for general purposes the total score appears to be relatively
valid even when discrepancies of more than 2 points occur in the break up.
3 RESULTS
Discrepancy scores
SETS A B C D E TOTAL
SCORE
ACTUAL
EXPECTED
DISCREPANCY
The raw score obtained by the subject was and her score on five sets A, B, C, D and E
was , , , and respectively. The discrepancies corresponding
to raw scores came out to be , , , and respectively. Since the
discrepancies are not deviating from +2 , -2, the scores are accepted to be valid measures of a
person’s general intellectual capacity. ( Even if discrepancies of is more than 2 points occur in
the break up, for general purposes the total score can be taken as relatively valid )
My subject obtained a percentile score of , corresponding to grade This implies that
she has capacity to forge new insights and to discern meaning in confusion. She has
ability to perceive and identify relationships. Her ability to generate new,
largely non-verbal concepts, which make it possible to think, clearly is also . This
shows her capacity to think clearly.
5 CONCLUSIONS
6 REFERENCES
6.1 RSPM Manual, Author- J.C. Raven
6.2 NCERT Textbook. Psychology Part II Class XII.
1. OBJECTIVE
To assess various aptitudes of my subject using David’s Battery of Differential Abilities.
2 BASIC CONCEPT
2 METHOD
3.2 Testing Material- DAT test booklet, DAT answer sheet, DAT profile sheet, DAT scoring key,
DAT manual, pencil, and eraser.
1. VERBAL ABILITY- Verbal ability refers to the comprehension of words and ideas or a
person’s ability to understand written language. VA is assesses by two different kinds of sub-
tests: vocabulary(VA Part I), and understanding proverbs ( VA Part II). This ability is related
to academic performance. It is predictor of occupations involving much writing and reading.
VA Part I involves word meaning exercise to assess the subject’s knowledge of English words
and his ability to abstract and generalize relationship among words. VA Part II involves the
ability to recognize the proverbs and understand their latent meaning.
3. SPATIAL ABILITY- Spatial ability is concerned with perceiving spatial patterns accurately
and following the orientation of figures when their position in plane or space is altered. In
DBDA, SA is assessed by items in which the subject must be able to determine quickly
whether two dimensional figures have been merely turned around( rotated) or they are
turned over and rotated(reversed). This ability is found to be high in individuals who are
successful in geometrical drawing, drafting, vocational training and art and design. It is
predictor of success in occupations such as architecture, engineering, commercial art, dress
designing, die making and decoration.
6. REASONING ABILITY- Reasoning Ability refers to the ability to apply the process of
reason from some specific information to a general principle. Here RA is measured by items
requiring the subject to inspect sets of four letters and discover which general principle they
follow. It is good indicator of non verbal, non culturally biased intelligence. RA is important
to success in courses and occupations in maths, computer programming, engineering, sciences
and scientific technology.
A summary regarding the timings and number of items in each test is given in the following
table.
VA Part – 1 4 mts 15
Part – 2 3 mts 30 sec 9
NA 5 mts 30 sec 20
SA 6 mts 72
CA 5 mts 20
MA 9 mts 25
CL 3 mts 72
RA 5 mts 12
PM 5 mts 70
RELIABILITY The preliminary reliability estimates from the data are derived from the KR-
20 formula as a measure of internal consistency. Since all DBDA R tests are speed tests, split
half and test retest reliability coefficients have also been derived.
Type of VA NA SA CA MA CL RA PM
coefficient
SPLIT .72 .82 .95 .84 .69 .94 .76 .84
HALF
KR-20 .75 .78 .92 .74 .62 .89 .66 .76
VALIDITY- The concrete validation is taken into consideration here. This is an indication
of the practical utility of a group of test that is how well their test correlates with other well
established tests or relevant criteria. In a study it was found that the correlation between
aptitude and academic achievement is not very high. The following table shows the
correlation between DBDA-R test and intelligence test.
3.4 Procedure
3.4.2 Instructions
“ i. There are eight subtests in this battery of subtests. The questions are written on the test
booklets while the answers are to be marked on the answersheet.
ii. Please ensure that you do not write anything on the test booklets
iii. Please enter the required information i.e. Name, Age etc. in the answer sheet.
iv. Instructions for each test are given in the test booklets. They will be read out loudly by me as
you read them silently.”
Write that instructions for each subtest are given on the test booklets and they were read out.
3.4.3 Precautions
a) The room should be well lit and well ventilated.
b) There should not be any noise in the room.
c) The seating arrangement should be comfortable.
d) The time limit for every test should be followed.
e) Time limit for SA and CL not to be disclosed.
f) Instructions should be made clear to the subject.
g) Proper rapport should be established before starting the practical.
h) It should be made sure that only one answer has been marked for each question.
i) It should be made clear to the subject that their answers must be marked inside
the boxes.
j) Make sure that the key and questionnaire which is being scored are properly
aligned; the number in front of the questions on the inventory should correspond
with the number of the key.
3.4.7 Scoring
The scoring procedure for DBDA R is very objective and simple. Separate stencil keys are
used for scoring. The raw scores on all tests, except PM are found by placing the key on the
answer sheet. Each answer is seen through the box drawn on the scoring key scores 1. It
should be ensure that only one response is marked for each item. After obtaining the raw
score, the appropriate norm table is selected from the manual and each raw score is converted
into its sten equivalent. To obtain the raw score on PM (Psychomotor Ability) test, each
4. RESULTS
SUBTEST RAW SCORE STEN SCORE INTERPRETATION
6. CONCLUSION
Writ e the subtests in which he scored high, average and poor. Also make some career
recommendation, if possible.
7. REFERENCES
i) DBDA Manual.
1. OBJECTIVE
To assess personality of my subject on using Eysenck’s Personality Inventory-
Revised (EPQ-R).
2. BASIC CONCEPT
2.1 Personality refers to our characteristic ways of responding to individuals and
situations. Personality refers to unique and relatively stable qualities that characterize
an individual’s behaviour across different situations over a period of time. Personality
is characterized by the following features:
Type approach
The type approaches attempts to comprehend human personality by examining certain
broad patterns in the observed behavioural characteristics of an individual.
I. HIPPOCRATES- Sanguine, phlegmatic. Melancholic, choleric
II. TRIDOSHAS- Vata, pitta and kapha
III. TRIGUNAS- Sattva, Rajas and Tamas
IV. SHELDON- Endomorphic, Mesomorphic and Ectomorphic
V. JUNG- Extroverts and Introverts
VI. FRIEDMAN AND ROSENMAN- Type A and Type B Personality
VII. MORRIS- Type C type D personality
Trait Approach
These theories are mainly concerned with the description or characterization of basic
components of personality. Trait is considered as a relatively enduring attribute or quality
on which one individual differs from other.
• Allport’s trait Theory
• Cattell’s personality factors
• Eyesenck’s theory
Eyesenck’s theory- He proposed that personality could be reduces into two broad
dimensions which are biologically and genetically based. Theses dimensions are:
Neuroticism vs emotional stability- It refers to the degree to which people have control
over their feelings. Neurotic people are anxious, moody, touchy, restless and quickly
3. METHOD
3.1 Preliminary Information – as per practical 1
3..2 Testing Material- EPQ-R booklet, EPQ-R answer sheet, EPQ-R scoring key, EPQ-R
manual, pencil, and eraser.
3.3 Description of the Test- Eysenck’s Personality Inventory was developed by Eysenck. It
is the result of many years of developmental work. It was designed to give a rough and ready
measure of two important personality dimensions: Neuroticism vs. emotional stability and
Introversion vs. extroversion. A third dimention was later added called Psychotisism vs
Sociability. Each of these two traits is measured by means of 48 questions, carefully selected
after lengthy item analysis.
3.4.2 Instruction
“Here are some questions regarding the way you feel and act. There are no right or wrong
answers because different people react in different manners for the same kind of experience.
Therefore, what you feel right is the most appropriate answer for you. For example;
3.4.3 Precautions
1. The room should be well lit and well ventilated.
2. There should not be any noise in the room.
3. The seating arrangement should be comfortable.
4. There is no time limit.
5. Instructions should be made clear to the subject.
6. No item should be left unanswered.
7. Proper rapport should be established before starting the practical.
8. It should be made sure that only one answer has been marked for each question.
9. It should be made clear to the subject that their answers must be marked inside the
boxes.
10. Make sure that the key and questionnaire which is being scored are properly aligned;
the number in front of the questions on the inventory should correspond with the
number of the key.
3.4.7Scoring
The inventory is scored directly from the test forms using translucent scoring key.
a) Check that each question has only one answer.
b) Place the left hand side of this key over the front page of the Test Form, adjusting it to
position by means of the two “check stars”.
c) There are two raw scores (N and E) to be obtained from each side, left and right (i.e.
front and back pages). The answers seen through the boxes count either 2 or 1, as
indicated by the number adjacent to the boxes.
4. RESULTS
DIMENSION RAW SCORE STEN SCORE INTERPRETATION
NEUROTICISM
EXTRAVERSION
6. CONCLUSIONS
Mention the interpretation (very specific) of three dimensions.
7. REFERENCES
i. EPQ-R Manual
1. OBJECTIVE.
To assess level of adjustment in various areas using Global Adjustment Scale.
2. BASIC CONCEPT
2.1 Adjustment refers to the adequacy of the personal and interpersonal processes that we
used to adapt to our environment. A well adjusted person is someone who engages in
behaviours that are appropriate for the culture and a given interpersonal situation. According
to this view well adjusted behaviours are flexible and subject to change in the environment,
produce no harmful effects on individual and other people and do not lead to short term and
long term interaction problems. Adjustment is a condition of harmonious relationship
between the social and the physical environment where in a person is able to obtain optimum
satisfaction for most of his needs and to meet fairly well the physical and social demands
imposed upon him. Hence adjustment is a process of making the changes needed or desired
in oneself and/or in one’s social and physical environment to experience what is termed as
adjustment.
The following five aspects of adjustment are of special importance:
a) Gaining skills through interaction with one’s world
b) Degree of control over one’s daily life
c) Redefining difficult situations in order to successfully meet the challenges of life
d) Self understanding, as it allows one to determine which life choices are most likely to result
in personal growth
e) Ability to make accurate judgments about the people and places in one’s life
3. METHOD
3.4 Procedure
3.4.3 Precautions
a) The room should be well lit and well ventilated.
b) There should not be any noise in the room.
c) The seating arrangement should be comfortable.
d) There is no time limit.
e) Instructions should be made clear to the subject.
f) No item should be left unanswered.
g) Proper rapport should be established before starting the practical.
h) It should be made sure that only one answer has been marked for each question.
i) It should be made clear to the subject that their answers must be marked inside
the boxes.
j) Make sure that the key and questionnaire which is being scored are properly
aligned; the number in front of the questions on the inventory should correspond
with the number of the key.
3.4.7 Scoring
The scoring procedure in GAS Form S is quite objective and simple. Transparent stencil
scoring keys are available for this purpose. The following steps are required for scoring:
4. RESULTS
Write interpretation for each dimension with the help of the manual
6. CONCLUSIONS
Write the dimensions in which the subject scored high, average and low.
7. REFERENCES
1) GAS Manual
1. OBJECTIVE
To assess the level of self concept of my subject using Dr.. Saraswat’s Self Concept Questionnaire.
2 . BASIC CONCEPT
2.1 SELF- Self refers to totality of an individual’s conscious experiences, ideas, thoughts
and feelings with regard to himself and herself.
2.2 HOW DOES SELF DEVELOP- A newly born child has no idea of its self. As a child
grows older, the idea of self emerges and its formation begins. Parents, friends,
teachers and significant others play a vital role in shaping a child’s ideas about self.
Our interactions with other people, our experiences and the meaning we give to them
serve as the basis of ourself. The structure of self is modifiable in the light of our own
experiences and the experiences we have of other people.
2.3 PERSONAL IDENTITY- It refers to those attributes of a person that makes him
different from others.eg. name
2.4 SOCIAL IDENTITY- It refers to those aspects of a person that link him to social or
cultural group.
2.5 SELF AS SUBJECT AND OBJECT- When self is described as doing something ( I am
a dancer), it is a subject. On the other hand if it is describes as an entity on which
something is done, it is described as object.
2.6 SELF CONCEPT- The way we perceive ourselves and the ideas we hold about our
competencies and attributes is also called self concept. This can be either positive or
negative. A person may have a positive view of her/his atheletic bravery but a
negative view of his academic talent.
2.7 KINDS OF SELF
1. Personal Self- this leads to an orientation in which one feels primarily concerned with
oneself.
2. Social self- the social self emerges in relation with others and emphasizes such aspects
of life as cooperation, unity, affiliation, sacrifice, support or sharing. This self values
family and social relationship. Hence it is also called familial or relational self.
SELF CONCEPT- The way we perceive ourselves and the ideas we hold about our
competencies and attributes is also called self concept. It can be either positive or
negative. A person can have a very positive view of his atheletic bravery but a
negative view of his academic talents.
Studies indicate that by the age of 6 to 7 yrs children seem to have formed self esteem
atleast in four areas- academic competence, social competence, atheletic competence
and physical appearance.
SELF EFFICACY refers to the believe of a person in his ability to control life outcomes
3. METHOD
3.2 Testing Material- SCQ Test form, SCQ Manual, pencil, eraser
3.3Description of the Test- ( Copy from the manual. Also make Table1, write the reliability and
validity. Also make the reliability table.)
3.4.3 Precautions
a) The room should be well lit and well ventilated.
b) There should not be any noise in the room.
c) The seating arrangement should be comfortable.
d) There is no time limit.
e) Instructions should be made clear to the subject.
f) No item should be left unanswered.
g) Proper rapport should be established before starting the practical.
h) It should be made sure that only one answer has been marked for each question.
i) It should be made clear to the subject that their answers must be marked inside the boxes.
j) Make sure that the key and questionnaire which is being scored are properly aligned; the
number in front of the questions on the inventory should correspond with the number of
the key.
3.4.7 Scoring - The respondent is provided with five alternatives to give his responses ranging from
most acceptable to least acceptable description of his self concept. The responses are in such a way
that the scoring system for all the items will remain the same i.e. 5,4,3,2,1 whether the items are
positive or negative. If the respondent puts a tick mark for first alternative the score is 5, for
second alternative the score is 4, for third the score is 3. For the fourth its 2 and for the fifth and the
last its 1. The summated score of all the eight items in each self-concept dimension provide the total
self concept score for that dimension. Interpretation for each score in each dimension is given in
Table 3 of the test manual. A high score on this inventory indicates a higher self concept, while a
low score shows low self-concept. Now all the scores of each dimension were added to get the total
self concept score of an individual. Interpretation for total self concept is given in Table 4 of the
manual.
4. RESULTS
My subject got a score of in the Physical dimension which means he/she has
self concept of his/her own body, health, physical appearance and strength. ( Do the same for
other dimensions and total self concept).
6. CONCLUSIONS
( Mention the dimensions in which he/she has high/average/low self concept. Also mention
the total self concept.)
7. REFERENCES
i) SCQ manual.