Coaching Assessment With The Process Communication Model PCM
Coaching Assessment With The Process Communication Model PCM
As a manager and as a coach I’ve seen assessments come and go, from MBTI, Insights to
colour coding. And with all of them I’ve had serious drawbacks, mostly to do with the fact
that you get an assessment based on characteristics, which don’t help me as a coach or
manager to deal behaviourally with the person or to help them develop.
Development of PCM
In the 1970s Dr. Taibi Kahler first developed PCM to select astronauts for the NASA.
Since then thousands of people all over the world, from astronauts to entrepreneurs to
American presidents, have experienced greater success and power in their personal and
professional lives after learning and applying the principles of Process Communication.
“The Process Communication Model provides a framework for evaluating the information
one wishes to communicate and the best means for doing so with various recipients of
that information.”
1/4
The basic principles of process communication are:
Each of us has a personality structure made up of six main personality types, which
influences our communication and stress management. No one type is more or less
OK. Each has strengths and weaknesses.
Without stress we have access to all our personality type behaviours and can easily
shift and choose from them. It is only under stress that we revert only to our base
personality type.
To communicate effectively with others you have to adapt your communication
style to theirs. How we say things is more important than what say.
Dreamer: As a dreamer you are appreciated for your calm and your ability to be
imaginative. You are very reflective and creative. What you need most is time to be alone.
Too much stimulus leads to distress and under stress you tend to withdraw and forget to
complete projects. To get out of stress you need someone else to initiate and be directive
in communication.
Harmonizer: As a harmonizer you are appreciated for your warmth empathy and ability
to nurture others. You are very sensitive and sensual. What you need most is recognition
for you as a person. Lack of recognition for you as a person and a cold environment leads
to negative stress. Under stress you tend to please others and make mistakes. To get out of
stress you need unconditional acceptance and sensory stimulation.
2/4
Workaholic: As a workaholic you are appreciated for your organized way of doing
things and your logical thinking. Your character strengths are in being logical structured
and responsible. What you need most is recognition of your work and structure. Negative
stress leads to perfectionism and attacking others. To get out of stress you need
recognition for doing a good job and for your structured approach.
Persister: You are appreciated for your value-driven, conscientious way of working. You
are dedicated and loyal. What you need most is recognition of your vision and opinions.
Negative stress leads you to find fault in others and become rigid in your opinions. To get
out of stress you need to speak of your values in a way to be heard and to be recognised for
your convictions.
Rebel: You are appreciated for your energetic and playful take on life. You are fun to be
with and frequently have ideas about different ways of doing things. What you need most
is playful contact. Negative stress leads you to delegate inappropriately and to blame
others for your mistakes. To get out of stress you need to ensure that you have fun.
Promoter: As a promoter you are appreciated for your persuasive charm. You have high
energy to get things done. What you need most is an environment in which you can
improvise and be action oriented. Negative stress leads to manipulative and blaming
behaviour. What you need is to regularly ensure you have safe and yet challenging
stimulations, positive excitement.
This inventory report identifies personality type, phase and the structure of the person,
with individualized information about: character strengths, the way the person views the
world and others, psychological needs, and distress sequences of self-sabotage. The
assessment shows you in which order you’ve built up your personality types, where you’ve
built up the most energy or competency, so which ones you will use most.
It tells you what behaviours you show when you get under stress, and what management
and communication style would help you most to manage your stress. It also tells you
what basic needs you can fulfil so you don’t get into stress in the first place.
Practical application
3/4
In my experience clients come to coaching broadly for two reasons: they are either in
acute distress or they find out their usual problem solving patterns don’t work anymore.
PCM helps you get in touch with your clients through their open communication doors
even under distress.
I had one young manager come for coaching in distress. He’d accepted his first people
management job three months before, having been a successful technical project manager
in the firm before. Within three months he had managed to upset many of the people in
his team, and his manager had warned him that if he didn’t manage to improve his people
management performance within 6 months he’d be demoted to his old job.
We agreed to work on the basis of PCM, so he first filled out the PCM questionnaire
online. It transpired that he had a workaholic personality base. He recognized he was very
task focussed, good with details, clear headed in his analyses – all competencies that
helped him greatly in his old job and also in providing structure and goals as a manager in
his new job. However he also recognized that his people relational skills lagged behind
and that under pressure he did the work alone, forgetting that as a manager his job was to
motivate other people to do the work for him.
Our contract was to work on redefining his role to getting other people to realize the goals
and thus to hone his relational management skills. We agreed that he’d bring in cases to
do with managing specific employees. My immediate role as a coach was more tutoring;
teaching him different models and a (PCM) frame of reference so that human behaviour
would become more predictable to him and so he could start using his impressive
thinking and analytical capacities to come up with options. It was a question of presenting
people management as a form of human technology to get into his open door.
He began to have fun predicting reactions and thinking up options. As his distress
diminished he was freer to explore and work through the emotions that had come up in
this period for him and take into account the feelings of others. After ten sessions he
asked his boss for a follow up conversation about his people management performance
and got good feedback. More telling perhaps was his wife’s happy reaction to this new
emotional side to him, in which he’d learned to ask for help.
4/4