13b-Behavioral Biases
13b-Behavioral Biases
1
Types of errors
Cognitive errors are basic statistical, information-
processing, or memory errors
2
Cognitive errors
Blind spots in human mind
3
Emotional biases
Stem from impulse, sometimes unreasoned judgements
4
Cognitive errors
1. Belief perseverance biases
i. Conservatism
ii. Confirmation
iii. Representativeness
▪ Base-rate neglect
▪ Sample-size neglect
iv. Illusion of control
v. Hindsight
2. Information processing biases
i. Anchoring
ii. Mental accounting
iii. Framing
iv. Availability
5
Emotional biases
1. Loss aversion
• Disposition effect
2. Overconfidence
3. Self-control
4. Status quo
5. Endowment
6. Regret-aversion
6
Cognitive errors (1)
Belief perseverance biases
i. Conservatism
ii. Confirmation
iii. Representativeness
▪ Base-rate neglect
▪ Sample-size neglect
iv. Illusion of control
v. Hindsight
7
Conservatism
Maintaining your prior views (or forecasts) by failing to
properly incorporate new information as it becomes available
Mitigation
React decisively and fully to any new information and seek
unbiased counsel
9
Confirmation
Seeking out evidence that confirms your beliefs and ignoring
evidence that contradicts them
• Researchers frame their data in ways that tend to confirm their
hypotheses
• During an election season, people tend to seek positive information
that paints their favored candidates in a good light. They will also
look for information that casts the opposing candidate in a negative
light
10
Confirmation …
11
Confirmation …
Classic example: Capital punishment studies
• In one experiment (Lord, Lepper, and Ross, 1979), 24 pro-death
penalty students and 24 anti-death penalty students critically
evaluated “studies” on capital punishment
• These students found that studies which supported their pre-
existing view were superior to those which contradicted it, in a
number of detailed and specific ways
• In fact, the studies all described the same experimental procedure
but with only the purported result changed
12
Confirmation …
Consequences for investments
Only reaffirming evidence is considered
Information is ignored that refutes the validity of the screen
Under-diversified portfolios if you fall in love with a
particular stock or sector
Holding too much of your own-company’s stock because
you are convinced of its growth prospects
13
Confirmation …
Mitigation
Actively look for information that challenges beliefs
Obtain corroborating support for investment decision
• If a stock breaks through 52-week high, obtain supporting
information to assure good value
• Confirming an investment idea through purchase is not a good
strategy
14
Representativeness
Classifying new information based on past experiences or the
way things have happened in the past
15
Representativeness …
Linda is 31, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored
in philosophy. As a student she was deeply concerned with
issues surrounding equality and discrimination. Is it more
likely that Linda is:
A bank clerk, or
16
Representativeness …
Steve, a 30-year old American, has been described by a
former neighbor as follows: “Steve is a very shy and
withdrawn, invariably helpful, but with very little interest in
people or the social world. A meek and tidy soul, he has a
need for order and structure and a passion for detail.” Which
occupation is Steve currently more likely to have:
Salesman, or
Librarian?
17
Representativeness …
What is the probability that Company A (ABC, a 75-year old
steel manufacturer that is having some business difficulties)
belongs to group X (value stocks that will likely recover)
rather than group Y (companies that will go out of business)?
18
Representativeness …
May explain long-term reversal: Stocks that have been
extreme losers in the preceding three years do much better
than extreme past winners over the subsequent three years
• Investors become unduly pessimistic about the prospects of the
past losers, driving down their prices. Prices revert back giving
exceptional returns
19
Representativeness: Sample size neglect
Hot hands: Imagine that you’re the coach of a basketball
team. There’s 10 sec left, and your team is down by a
basket. Your star player (5-year career average of 55% shots
made) is only 2 for 10 today. Another veteran player (5-year
career average of 45% shots made) is 10 for 10 today.
Whom do you give the ball to?
20
Representativeness: Hot hands
21
Representativeness: Sample size neglect …
Law of small numbers!
23
Representativeness: Regression to mean
It’s been better to have been a novice than a professional the
past few years, because people with the most experience
have been the most cautious. But markets do regress back to
the mean, and I agree that we are late in the ball game. This
is the longest period we’ve ever had with such high returns
from equities, and I can’t believe it’s a new era that will just
keep going forever. I don’t know if returns going forward will
be 7% or 8%, but I’m pretty sure that they will be below
average.
Excerpt from an interview that appeared in the August 18, 1997 issue of Fortune magazine, with global
strategist Barton Biggs of Morgan Stanley and senior investment advisor Robert Farrell of Merrill Lynch
24
Representativeness: Regression to mean
Regression to mean implies that future returns will be closer
to their historical average. But is does not mean that they
will be below their historical average
25
Representativeness …
Lack of performance persistence but performance-fund flow
relationship in mutual funds
Difficulty in market timing
26
Illusion of control
When people believe that they can control or influence
outcomes
• A mid-level manager may believe that he can personally influence
his employer's stock price
• People permitted to select their own numbers in lottery are willing
to pay a higher price than those using randomly assigned numbers
27
Illusion of control …
Consequences
Excessive trading
Inadequate diversification (often due to over-investing in
own-company stock)
Mitigation
Keep detailed records of your predictions and refer back to
these in order to get an honest assessment of your
predictive powers
28
Hindsight bias
Seeing past events as having been inevitable and predictable
• People tend to remember their own predictions of the future as
more accurate than they actually were
29
Hindsight bias …
Consequences
Overestimating how well they predicted various events
Unfairly assessing money manager or security performance
Mitigation
Keep detailed records and refer back to them
Seek out contrary and independent views
30
Cognitive errors (2)
Information processing biases
i. Anchoring
ii. Mental accounting
iii. Framing
iv. Availability
31
Anchoring
When required to estimate a value with unknown magnitude,
people generally begin by envisioning some initial default
number—an “anchor”—which they then adjust up or down to
reflect subsequent information and analysis
• Regardless of how the initial anchor was chosen, people tend to
adjust their anchors insufficiently and produce end approximations
that are, consequently, biased
• Related to conservatism bias
32
Anchoring …
Real estate appraisal: Two groups of professional real-estate
agents were shown the same house. One group was given a
list price of $65,900, the other $83,900. Their average
appraisals were $67,811 and $75,190, respectively.
• When asked to explain their decisions, less than 25% mentioned
listing price as one of the factors
33
Anchoring …
Consequences
Holding onto a stock to attain a price that you are anchored
to, such as the purchase price or a high-water mark
(instead of rational analysis)
Making a market or security forecast anchored to last year’s
market levels or ending securities prices
34
Mental accounting
A process to code, categorize, and evaluate economic
outcomes by grouping their assets into any number of non-
fungible (non-interchangeable) mental accounts
• Segregating investments by source of funds
▪ Bonuses, salaries, etc. being invested in different accounts or managed
separately
35
Mental accounting …
Imagine that you bought a ticket to a hit Broadway play. At
the theater you realize that you have lost your ticket which
cost $250. Do you spend another $250 to see the
performance?
Now imagine the same scenario, but you are planning to buy
the $250 ticket when you arrive. At the box office, you
realize that you have lost $250 somewhere in the parking lot.
Still, you have more than enough to buy the ticket. Do you?
36
Mental accounting …
Imagine that you go a store to buy a lamp which sells for
$100. At the store, you discover that the same lamp is on
sale for $75 at a branch of the store five blocks away. Do you
go to the other branch to get the lower price?
37
Mental accounting …
Mentally account for money as too sacred or special to
become too conservative with it
• Retirement money: 401(k), 403(b), 457 plans.
• $10K saved will grow to only $43K in bonds @5% but $174K in
stocks @10% over a period of 30 years
• Mentally accounting for retirement money as too special could
mean that you haven’t saved enough for your retirement
38
Mental accounting …
Mental accounting can cause investors to irrationally
distinguish between returns derived from income and those
derived from capital appreciation
• Can cause some investors to chase income streams and unwittingly
erode principal in the process
39
Framing
Making skewed decisions based on how a question is framed
40
Framing …
Imagine that you are the commander of an army, threatened with a
superior enemy force. Your staff say that your soldiers will be caught in
an ambush in which 600 soldiers will die unless you lead them to safety
by one of two available routes. If you take route A, 200 soldiers will be
saved. If you take route B, there is a one-third chance that 600 soldiers
will be saved and a two-thirds chance that none will be saved? Which
route do you take?
41
Framing …
Choose a portfolio
42
Framing …
Consequences
Misidentifying risk tolerance
Choosing sub-optimal investments
Focus on short-term price fluctuations
43
Availability
Estimating the probability of an outcome based on how easily
it comes to mind
Consequences
Making choices based on advertising or reputation
Limited range of investments are considered, which leads to
an insufficiently diversified portfolio and inappropriate asset
allocation
44
Availability …
“All accidents”
and “all disease”
the same; in
reality 1:16.
Most overstated:
Rare but
spectacular
Most
understated: “Rare” “Common”
Common,
mostly non-fatal Slovic, Fischhoff, Lichtenstein (1982)
45
Availability …
A. Estimate the percentage of words in the English language
that begin with the letter “a”
B. Estimate the percentage of words in the English language
that have the letter “a” as their third letter
46
Availability …
47
Availability …
Buying decision: Almost 5,000 stocks to choose from (U.S.).
Seek among those which easily come to mind. E.g., large
price changes
30
25
Percent Order Imbalance
20
Large Discount Brokerage
0
1a 1b 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10a 10b
-5
49
Loss aversion
Making increasingly risky bets in order to avoid suffering or
recognizing losses
50
Loss aversion …
Imagine that you have just been given $1,000 and have
been asked to choose between two options. Option A:
Guaranteed additional $500. Option B: heads you get
additional $1000, tails gain nothing?
Now imagine that you have been given $2000 and have to
choose between two options. Option A: Guaranteed losing
$500. Option B: heads you lose $1000, tails lose nothing?
51
Loss aversion …
Reference point: Investor A owns a block of share which she
originally bought at $100 per share. Investor B owns a block
of share of the same stock for which she paid $200 per
share. The value of stock was $160 yesterday and today it
dropped to $150 per share. Who do you think is more upset?
52
Loss aversion …
53
Loss aversion …
People are pre-disposed to “get-even-itis”
• Have difficulty in making peace with their losses
• Disposition effect is the propensity to lock in sure gains than to lock
in sure loss
54
Loss aversion: Disposition effect
55
Loss aversion …
Individuals are more likely to sell stocks that have risen in
price rather than those that have fallen in price (Odean,
2001)
• Stock that is up in value is 70% more likely to be sold than a stock
that is down
• A losing stock is held for a median of 124 days while a winning
stock is held for a median of 102 days
• Stocks that investors sold outperform the stocks that they held by
3.4% over the next 12 months
56
Loss aversion …
Coval and Shumway (2005) investigate morning and
afternoon trades of 426 traders of CBOT
• Assume significantly more risk in the afternoon trading following
morning losses than gains
Locke and Mann (1999) find that CME traders also display
disposition effect/loss aversion
• Best traders are the ones who are least loss-averse (sold their
losers and rode their winners)
57
Overconfidence
Believing that you have superior knowledge, abilities, and
access to information (illusion of knowledge)
58
Overconfidence …
Prediction overconfidence
Give high and low estimates for the weight in pounds of an
empty Boeing 747 aircraft. Choose numbers far apart to be
90% certain that the true answer lies in between.
Certainty overconfidence
How good a driver are you? Compared to the drivers you
encounter on the road, are you above-average, average, or
below-average?
59
Overconfidence …
May have biological evolutionary roots
60
Overconfidence …
Individuals who trade the most frequently post exceptionally
poor investment results
Source: Brad Barber and Terrance Odean, 2000, “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock
Investment Performance of Individual Investors,” Journal of Finance 55, 773–806.
61
Overconfidence …
Barber and Odean (2001)
Performance of stocks picked by men and women was
about the same
62
Overconfidence …
Day traders abandoned regular jobs to trade full time from
their personal computers
63
Overconfidence …
Mitigation
64
Self-control
Inability to delay gratification
65
Self-control …
Hyperbolic discounting: Tendency to prefer small payoffs now
than large payoffs in the future, where the tendency
increases closer to the present both payoffs are
66
Self-control …
Consequences
Failing to save for retirement
Taking on too much risk in an attempt to catch up
Undiversified portfolio (e.g., too many equities, etc.)
67
Status quo
Doing nothing rather than making optimal investment
decisions
Consequences
Failing to explore new opportunities, specifically when a
change might the best decision for the portfolio
Maintaining a portfolio that has drifted away from its
optimal allocation
68
Endowment
Valuing assets more when you own them than when you
don’t
69
Endowment …
Imagine that you recently found a ticket to the Final Four.
You very much want to go. Now a stranger offers to buy your
precious ticket. What is the smallest amount for which you
would sell?
Now imagine that you don’t have a ticket to the event, but
you really want one. How much would you be willing to pay?
70
Endowment …
Investors hold onto securities that they have inherited,
regardless of whether retaining these securities makes sense
71
Endowment …
Fail to contribute to your pension plan
• Typically employers match 50¢ to each dollar of your contribution
up to 6% of your salary
• 12 million people choose not to accept this free money
▪ Costs employees $6 billion a year in missed employer matches
• Overvalue what they have today (today’s salary) and fail to value
what they could have
72
Regret aversion
When past investment decisions - notably the regret
associated with them - have irrational influence over future
investment decisions
73
Regret aversion …
Consequences
Overly-conservative investing
Investing in the familiar
Herding behavior
Hanging on to a losing investment in order to avoid
realizing a loss
74
Skepticism
Don’t people make fewer mistakes when given proper
incentives?
75
Skepticism …
Behavioral biases cost you money but reflect psychological
tendencies that bring benefits in other areas
• Tendency to weigh losses more than gains is doubtless useful from
evolutionary standpoint
• Tendency to set up mental accounts can serve you well, for
instance in saving for future
76
Practical advice
Once a behavioral bias has been identified, it may be
possible to either moderate the (cognitive) bias or adapt to
the (emotional) bias so that the resulting financial decisions
more closely match the rational financial decisions assumed
by traditional finance
77