Value Stream Analysis Training
Value Stream Analysis Training
Analysis
Training
Value Added
Value is added any time we physically change our product
towards what the customer is buying
If we are not adding value, we are adding cost or waste
Lean Manufacturing drives the systematic elimination of
waste
5% Overproduction
Waiting
Transportation
Non-value added
processing
Excess inventory
Non-value added Excess motion
Defects
PROCESSING
7
Wastes DEFECTS
MOTION INVENTORY
7 Basic Types of Waste (Toyota)
Overproduction – producing more than what is
demanded by the customer
Inventory – Storing more than the absolute minimum
needed
Transportation – the unnecessary movement of
materials
Waiting – waiting for the next process step
Excess processing – due to poor tool or product design
Wasted motion – unnecessary reaching, walking,
looking for parts, tools, prints, etc
Defects – scrap and rework
What is Flow ?
Producing and moving one item at a time (or a
small and consistent batch of items) through a
sequence of process steps as continuously as
possible, with each step making just what is
requested by the next step.
Supplying
process Customer
process
A B
product product
Mike Rother
Learning to See
SUPERMARKET
CUSTOMER PROCESS goes to supermarket and withdraws what it
needs when it needs it.
SUPPLYING PROCESS produces to replenish what was withdrawn.
PURPOSE: Controls production at supplying process without trying to
schedule. Controls production between flows.
Takt Time
Takt time paces production to the pace of customer
requirements.
Total daily operating time
Takt Time =
Total daily customer requirement
Phase 1
Pre-event Planning
Pre-Event Work
Three weeks prior to the event
Determine team members
Define the objective of the team
Select the area and topic
Logistics (conf. Rm., times, facilitator supplies,
etc.)
Invite team members to the event
Clarify roles and responsibilities
• Event leader-value stream manager from the area (owns
resources and results)
• Event facilitator-CI Leaders who manage the
improvement process and share in ownership of results
• Subject matter experts
Pre-Event Work
Two weeks prior to the event
Part/quantity analysis (select representative part
number)
Gather and review data (Yield, job closures,
CONC, etc.)
Determine future demand
Review prior event data
Review any customer issues
Review any requirements for capital equipment
Phase 2
The Main Event
The Main Event
1. Training
2. Gemba Walk
3. Value Stream Map-Current State
4. Develop Ideal State Map
5. Develop Future State Map (3 months out)
6. Develop Future State Plan
7. Management Report Out
VSM Event Steps 1 &2
Training and Gemba Walk
1. Training
The concepts of Lean need to be applied to
classroom training as well as our other processes
• This is a learn by doing process
• We will minimize classroom learning
2. Gemba Walk
Gemba means, “shop floor” or “where the process is”
We need to go there so we know what we are
mapping
VSM Event Step 3
Current State Map
3. Value Stream Map-Current State
1. Map the physical flow (manufacturing loop,
customer loop, supplier loop)
2. Map the information flow
3. Complete the lead time data bar
4. Visually identify waste
1. Identify value added/non-value added (red, yellow,
green dots)
2. Visually identify the most significant opportunities with
kaizen bursts.
5. Summarize all information and metrics (date,
P/N, times, inventory, OTD, quality, etc.)
Elements of Value Stream Maps
30 Days MRP Monthly Orders 880
Supplier Customer
Supplier Loop Customer Loop
Takt Time = 440 min/44
= 10 min/unit
Bi-Monthly Information
Manufacturing Loop
Op 1 Op 2 Op 3 Op 4 Op 5 Op 6
45 Days 1 Day 2 Days 2 Days 1 Day 5 Days 1 Day
45 1 2 2 1 5 1
4 Hrs 12 Days
(1 Hr.) 4 Hrs
COMPUTER WIP
Visually Identify Waste
As a team, review each process step for elements
that are value added and non value added
Each step can have any combination of value
added, type 1 waste and/or type 2 waste
Identify value added with a green dot
Identify type 1 waste (waste but unavoidable in the current
state) with a yellow dot
Identify type 2 waste (pure waste, eliminate immediately)
with a red dot
As type 2 waste is identified, generate the actions
to remove it (this will be the beginning of the future
state implementation plan)
Prioritize the waste opportunities and identify the
biggest opportunities on the CS map with kaizen
bursts
VSM Event Step 4
Ideal State Map
Avoid shared resources
Assume that anything is possible
Our customers are happy
Our profits are up
High job satisfaction
Capital is available if needed
Create an ideal state map
Map the physical flow
Map the information flow
Complete the lead time data bar
VSM Event Step 5
Future State Map (3 months out)
What of the ideal state map can be
implemented in 3 months?
Identify short term goals
LEAD TIME
INVENTORY
PRODUCTIVITY
QUALITY
CAPACITY
Work from your current state map
VSM Event Step 6
Future State Plan
This plan answers the question, “what actions need to be
completed in the next 90 days to achieve the future state?
Think back to the “visually identify waste” step
Plan addresses all “red dots” and Kaizen bursts
DATE
Activ- GOAL/
ACTION PRIORITY LEADER EST ACT STATUS/REMARKS
ity OPPORTUNITY OPEN
COMP COMP
The electrical Re-locate THE ELECTRICAL TEST
station is located electrical station STATION HAS BEEN
1 Test Short Term TEAM 1/5/2005 1/10/2005 1/7/2005
away from the closer to test RELOCATED NEAR THE
test area. area. TEST AREA
Phase 3
Accountability Process
The Accountability Process
The momentum for improvement is never higher
then at the end of the event when everyone can
really see the waste. As a result the accountability
process must start immediately following the event
(next day).
Display the current state map, future state map and
future state plan in the the affected area.
Commit to a stand up meeting in front of the maps
and plan (daily at first, and then less frequent as
applicable)
Focus on Due date control. Not meeting dates is letting
the team down
Current State Value Stream Map
Future State Value Stream Map
Value Stream
Mapping :
Step by step
Tools:
• Team Charter
• SIPOC/Top- Down Charting/Swim lane Flow Chart
Getting Started
From Sand to Display Product at the customer
But...
Mapping the entire stream is too
much for getting started!
10 Steps VSM Analysis
storage welding
mapping Lager Stanzen
stamping
Schweißen Schweißen
welding Montage1
assembly1
Montage2
assembly2
shipping
Versand
I 1 1 1 1 1 I
coils 2700L
4 days 1440R
Z/T: 1S
C/T: C/T: 39 S
Z/T: s Z/T:
C/T: 46
46 Ss Z/T:
C/T: 62 S
s Z/T:
C/T: 40
40 Ss
R/T: 60
C/O: 60 Min.
Min. R/T:
C/O: 10
10 Min.
min. C/O: 10
R/T: 10 Min.
min. R/T: 00 Min.
C/O: min. R/T:
C/O: 00 Min.
min.
V: 85 % 80%
Uptime: Uptime:
V: 100 % Uptime:
V: 80 %
80% Uptime:95%
V: 100 % V: 100 %
Uptime:95%
90%
Q:
FTY:
0,010.9
%A 0,80.9
FTY:
Q: %A Q: 0,20.85
FTY: %A FTY:
Q: 1,20.95
%A Q: 0,30.95
FTY: %A
Collect
2 shift
information for 2 shift 2 shift 2 shift 2 shift
Data Box
Example ABC company:
The sequence of the several processes will be drafted after the
first overview has been carried out and the appropriate data will
be added in the proper data boxes.
Data Box: Select Data Attributes
What to measure?
Should support a company’s objectives for the cost, service, and
quality
Should highlight waste
Be flexible
Revise as necessary as the process tasks are defined
Select ones you may already be using
If there is time, seek out some baseline measures
Data Collection
Attribute Data to Collect
➢ Shipping/Receiving schedules
➢ Pack sizes at each process ➢ C/O (changeover time)
➢ Demand rates by process (Takt Time) ➢ OEE(Overall Equipment
➢ Working hours and breaks Effectiveness)
➢ Inventory Points (location & size) ➢ FTY (First Time Yield)
➢ How Operations are scheduled ➢ Scrap rate
➢ Work-in-process inventory ➢ Defect/Rework Rate
➢ Overtime per week ➢ VA/ NVA Time
➢ Process cycle times ➢ Batch Size/ Pack Size
➢ Number of product variations at each ➢ Distance Traveled
step
➢ Downtime
➢ Batch (lot) sizes
➢ Etc..
➢ Changeover times/frequencies
LEAN GOVERNMENT PROCESS METRICS
FTQ
Step 4: Map the Material Flow
customer
supplier
18400 pcs /
150 ft coils month
12000 L
6400 R
1Tray = 20 pieces
AZ/S: 480 min
Mo + We
daily
R/T: 60
C/O: 60 Min.
Min. R/T: 10
C/O: 10 Min.
min. R/T: 10
C/O: 10 Min.
min. R/T:
C/O: 00 Min.
min. R/T:
C/O: 00 Min.
min.
V: 85 %
FTY.: 80 % V: 10090
FTY.: %% V:
s. r.:
8080%% V: r.:
s. 100100
%% V:
s. r.:
100 100
%%
Rejt:
Q: 0,01
0,01
%%AA Q: 0,8 % A Q: 0,2 % A Q: 1,2 % A Q: 0,3 % A
AZ/S:480Min
WT/S:480Min AZ/S:480Min
WT/S:480min AZ/S:480Min
WT/S:480min AZ/S:480Min
AZ/S:480Min
WT/S:480min AZ/S:480Min
WT/S:480min
S: 2 S: 2 S: 2 S: 2 S: 2
XYZ AG
customer
Krupp-Stahl
supplier
daily
täglich
5 days 7,6 days 1,8 days 2,7 days 2,0 days 4,5 days W/T: 23,6 d
1s 39 s 46 s 62 s 40 s
P/T: 188 s
Step 6 - Map the Information
Example ABC company:
Flow
Now the entire information flow from the
supplier across the manufacturing to the
customer will be added to the actual map.
forecast forecast
production planning
Krupp-Stahl & -control customer
XYZ AG
supplier faxback daily order
150 ft coils MRP 18400 pcs / month
12000 L
6400 R
1Tray = 20 pieces
weekly production plan AZ/S: 480 min
S: 2
Mo +
&Mi
We
daily
täglich
Weekly Fax
Review &
Receive Order Check Credit Enter Order Reconcile Order Confirm Order Finalize Order
IN IN IN IN IN IN
P/T = ½ min P/T = 1 min P/T = 10 min P/T = 1 min P/T =7 min P/T = 5 min
Batch = 4 % Accept = 90% % C&A = 60% %C&A = 75% %C&A = 85% Batch = 1day
hours Batch = 4 hours Batch = 1.6 Batch = 1.6 Batch = 2 hours
hours hours
Total Lead Time = 2.65 days Total Processing Time= 24.5 min First Pass Yield = 34.4%
Step 7 – Identify VA & NVA Semi-Weekly
Ship Schedule
Order Entry Process
Incoming Current State - Sept. 2007 MRP MRP
Production
Orders Schedule
Fax FIN
All orders willMRP be processed MRP Phone
within one hour MRP
Total Lead Time = 2.65 days Total Processing Time= 24.5 min First Pass Yield = 34.4%
Process Streamlining – Removing
NVA
Eliminate Non-Value Add
Tasks: NVA
Handling
Paperwork
Counting, Issuing, Retrieving Logging information
Wait Checking calculations
Proofreading Reviewing and approving
Inspection and checking Moving and set-up
Monitoring work
Sorting work
Any type of rework
Analysis Tools to identify
opportunities
Value Analysis
Waste Analysis
Root Cause Analysis
5 Whys
Fishbone Diagram
Fault Tree Analysis
Eliminate, Combine, Rearrange or
Simplify
Design Future State - Purpose
Fax waste!!!
FIN MRP MRP Phone MRP
hours hours
IN IN IN IN IN IN
Current Identify
state waste
Continuous
Measure Incremental
Improvement Future
&
state
Adjust
Implement
62
Order Entry Process
Incoming Future State - Sept. 2007
Orders
Semi-Weekly
Ship Schedules
MRP Schedule
MRP
Phone / Web Production
Production
via
Schedule
FG Kanban
Receive / Credit
Check / Reconcile Implement
Confirm
Kanban
Kanban will:
MRP/FIN ✓Schedule Production to real time demand.
✓Optimize (level) and Control Inventory.
✓Link Production to Customer Demand.
P/T < 10 min
% accept = 90%
Batch = 1
MRP
Phone / Web Schedule
Production
via FG Kanban
Receive / Credit
Check / Reconcile
Confirm
MRP
Phone / Web Schedule
Production
via FG Kanban
Receive / Credit
Check / Reconcile
Confirm Shipping
MRP/FIN
• Used to control production where continuous flow does not extend upstream.
• Example Reasons for Supermarkets:
- Process that operate at very fast or slow cycle times and need to change over to serve multiple
product families
- Some processes, such as those at suppliers, are far away and shipping one piece at a time does
not make sense.
- Some processes have too much lead time or are too unreliable to couple directly to other
processes in a continuous flow.
• A pacemaker process is single point in the manufacturing value stream that sets the
production pace for the entire process.
• The pacemaker process is frequently the most downstream continuous-flow process.
• On the future-state map, the pacemaker process is the production process that is
controlled by the outside customer’s orders.
• Load-leveling means
distributing the
production of different
products evenly over a
time period, creating a
product “mix”.
• The schedule should
create an “initial pull” by
releasing and withdrawing
a small, consistent
increment of work, called
the “Pitch”.
• Load-leveling means
distributing the
production of different
products evenly over a
time period, creating a
product “mix”.