Reading Skills: Scanning, Intensive Reading and Extensive Reading
Reading Skills: Scanning, Intensive Reading and Extensive Reading
READING SUBSKILLS
Krashen & Terrell (1998) identify the four main sub-skills of reading as skimming,
scanning, intensive reading and extensive reading.
What is “skill”?
What is “skills”?
Educational books and articles on reading instruction in the 1970s and 1980s
provide a vague and ambiguous meaning of “skills.”
“A critical part of any reading or language arts program is the teaching of the skills
underlying the reading process. Without the basic skills of word discrimination,
vocabulary development, and comprehension, it is virtually impossible for a
student to read a new material with success” (Gross et al., 1974).
“Given a sentence with a heteronym, the student will identify correctly, from the
context, the syllable that is accented.”
The word “skills” in the writings of such authors means little more than “whatsits”
or “thingamies.”
Conclusion
The key feature of every skill is the integration of the complex set of behaviors that
make the total pattern. Integration is learned through practice. Practice in
integration is only supplied by performing the whole skill. One learns to fish by
fishing, one learns to play chess by playing chess and one learns to read by
reading.
This explains Bamberger’s (1976) paradox that, “Many children do not read books
because they cannot read well enough. They cannot read well enough because they
do not read books.” It also explains why, in general, seem to learn to read by almost
any method.
Singer (1966) states, “Children have learned to read by means of a wide variety of
methods and materials… However, all the necessary elements for reading are
present in the materials employed by each method. Pupils learning to read through
any of these methods could have used their capabilities for selecting their own unit
of perception, their own conceptualized mediational response systems, and
developed their own mental organization for attaining speed and power of reading.”
It is, however, important to note that teachers, their methods and their materials
do make a difference in children’s success and failure in learning to read.