Introduction

It has never been easy to settle for once the contestation about nature versus nurture. The different
positions in terms of the key determinants of attributes such as people's traits and personalities.
Genetically speaking, nature results from a blend that is biological within a person and in effect determine
how a person acts and behaves in the society thus it can, therefore, be stated that nature in its entirety
depends on a mixture of hereditary factors. Nurture, however, depends on factors of the environment a
person has been open to. These environmental factors are responsible for modeling the persona of a
person. The fact that one's life is confronted with the two situations i.e., nature and nurture, the process of
developing is therefore impacted by both. I will prove that nature and nurture are larger contributor to the
outcome of our personalities.
The code of nature has it that a person's genetic features are gotten from their ancestry because it matches
to a greater degree that of the family tree. The physical appearances, as well as our susceptibility to some
health issues, can be attributed to genetic factors and its mixture. Some people grow taller while others
remain shorter, some have light skin while others are dark in their complexion, and some develop
diabetes while others do not. All these are contributed to by genetics. Notably, the above-mentioned
factors are usually synonymous with people sharing the same blood or ancestry which also means they
have the same mixture of genes. People's genetic composition yields qualities such as behavior,
personality as well as mental traits which are common among people who are related by blood. It has
shown that it is not difficult to identify people who are related based on the common traits they share as
well as due to their genetic mixture.
Furthermore, some character traits are undetectable until people grow older. They are hidden for the
childhood duration, but they become clearly noticeable upon the attainment of some age. What then is
nature vs nurture debate about when characters get pronounced upon maturity? People's experience in
terms of starting to see such characters are guided by times which essentially are typical nature vs nurture
examples. But, time is as well a factor of nurture. It has been further established that the time for such
traits to manifest could as well be affected by some other factors that are residing within the body of a
person. But, it is important to remember that our mixture in terms of genes and the family tree plays the
role in conserving the nature of trait we have. For example, other than when one is affected by an
accident, he/she will grow to the height that the genes dictate.

The environmental factors play an important role in nurturing a person towards adapting to some
roles or strengthening some characters. Children, when born, have a tabula rasa (empty brain)
meaning that they have a clean slate that is not having anything on it but as they mingle with
their environment and the people within it including their parents, they begin to learn somethings
which end up shaping their characters. Plainly put, environmental factors directly contribute to
one's learning process, their development as well as how they will interact with others.

The parents are responsible for what one becomes later in life in as far as their relationship with
others. To define nurture is essentially to understand that nurturing begins right from the time a
child is born to the time he is able to independently make a decision or take care of him/her. If a
child demonstrates love, this is partly because of the affection he/she got from the parents;
therefore, parenting is a key aspect of nurturing. The better a child is raised, the more they show
good behaviors contrarily a child whose parents are cruel and shows fewer regards in terms of
how they bring up their child will negatively impact the child to an extent that that particular
child will show resentfulness, lack of confidence and probably low self-esteem.
Furthermore, extreme cases such as personality disorders come to fore because of the bad
environment that was suppressive to a child that affected them psychologically. This is a nature
vs nurture example. Such situations (negative environment) fails to bring a balance between the
biological aspects thus affecting the exposed children to the point they react negatively to any
situation that they think is threatening. Victims of molestation and physical abuse become so
defensive later in life to a point that they also act just like those who inflicted them. When a child
apes some of the things they see or if they practice them later in life then they are just putting
them into use.

Conclusion

Generally, to contend with the fact that nature vs nurture can only be looked at wholesomely
given that none of them is superior to the other. Critically, they both play an important role in the
growth and development of a person. At every step in the life of a person, the interactions
between the two, i.e. nurture and nature becomes a common phenomenon that cannot be avoided.
One has to be born to a certain family, besides living with others in the same environment where
they not only learn new things but they also practice some of the things they have learned. A
further argument has been developed by the psychologists to the effect that environment and
genetic combination bears a greater influence on how a child develops both mentally and
physically. However, the disorders associated with the brain are attributable to how these two
factors interact (nature and nurture). Culture and genetic mixtures create a common platform
where one draws some of the traits they later apply in life, and that is why an encounter with a
negative platform will not be isolated to the side of one aspect (to either nature or nurture) but
will jointly influence a person's life. Therefore, there is no difference in terms of influence in as
far as nature and nurture are concerned but they all support each other when it comes to
modeling a person's character.

Highlighting the difference between nature and nurture is a constructive debate that rages on but
the most important point to note is that the proponents and the opponents alike have good points
to justify their claims. Nurture draws from the environmental aspects that we interact with every
day from when we are born. Aw develop and grow to full maturation, we see things around, we
ape what others do, we learn languages and we create relationships. All these are factors that are
aided by the environment. Nature, on the other hand, draws from biological factors that are
inherited from the parents or the blood relatives. The combination that we have genetically has a
bearing on the future generation or on our children. They are likely to behave just as we did or
bear certain illnesses running in the family. But nature vs nurture debate doesn't rule out the
thinking process plus the behavior of an individual stemming from what he/she inherited right
from birth from the parents.

However, further arguments which are neutral have agreed that the two cannot be divorced give
that they all have a significant contribution to one's life. What we do and how we think cannot be
separated from what we see and the language we speak. The two viewpoints have been
reconciled by the fact that human beings need the social environment not only to cope with the
health issues that can be acquired due to hereditation but to be human and to function fully as
one. So nature vs nurture is almost one and the same thing. How to start a nature vs nurture
essay is no longer daunting task because the principles informing the argument as contained in
the entire body does not change greatly neither do they indicate major difference between nature
and nurture. Importantly, you are now able to explain what is nature vs nurture? And give an
informed position.