M5 Notes
M5 Notes
subversion. This charge was base on their alleged complicity in the uprising of workers at the
Cavite Naval yard. The death of Gomburza brought strong and awakened strong feelings of
anger and resentment among the Filipinos. They began to question the Spanish authorities and
demand reforms . The association of the three priest or the Gomburza helped to inspire the
organization of the propaganda. Which seek reforms and inform Spain and abuses of its
colonial government.
GOMBURZA for allegedly instigating the Cavite mutiny.
The Cavite Mutiny led to the persecution of prominent Filipinos; secular priests Mariano
Gómez, José Burgos, and Jacinto Zamora—who would then be collectively named GomBurZa
—were tagged as the masterminds of the uprising.
The Cavite Mutiny led to the persecution of prominent Filipinos; secular priests Mariano
Gómez, José Burgos, and Jacinto Zamora—who would then be collectively named GomBurZa—
were tagged as the masterminds of the uprising. The priests were charged with treason and
sedition by the Spanish military tribunal—a ruling believed to be part of a conspiracy to stifle the
growing popularity of Filipino secular priests and the threat they posed to the Spanish clergy.
The GomBurZa were publicly executed, by garrote, on the early morning of February 17, 1872 at
Bagumbayan.
OBJECTIVES OF PROPAGANDA MOVEMENT
Members of the Propaganda Movement were called propagandists or reformists. They
worked inside and outside the Philippines. Their objectives were to seek:
▪ Recognition of the Philippines as a province of Spain
▪ Equal status for both Filipinos and Spaniards
▪ Philippine representation in the Spanish Cortes
▪ Secularization of Philippine parishes.
▪ Recognition of human rights
The Propaganda Movement never asked for Philippine independence because its
members believed that once Spain realized the pitiful state of the country, the Spaniards
would implement the changes the Filipinos were seeking.
MODULE 5 NOTES
References
Schumacher, J. N. (2011). The Cavite Mutiny Toward a Definitive History. Philippine
Studies.
Blanco, R., Prado, R. (2010). Pedro Peláez, leader of the Filipino clergy. Philippine Studies.
Conflicts began when bishops from the secular clergy insisted on visiting the parishes which
were being run by the priests from the regular clergy. The bishops argued that it was the
duty to
check on these parishes administration. In response to this, the regulars refused the visit
saying
that they were not under the jurisdiction of the bishops. The regulars then threatened to
abandon
their parishes if the seculars persisted.
These conflicts impinged on Rizal's politics in particular because he highly criticized the
Catholic Church. Rizal had grievances that were legitimate against the clergymen, which
were
deeply rooted in in experiences that outraged his sense of justice. Friars performed
functions that
were indispensable to development which led to abuses. They stuck to these functions even
when
Filipinos were ready to take them up on their own. The result of this was the unwarranted
privileges for clergymen and tensions arose between the emerging bourgeoisie and the
friars,
among others.
Citation
Blanco, Roberto. 2010. Pedro Pelaez, leader of the Filipino clergy. Schumacher,
John, 2011. The Cavite Mutiny: Toward a definite history.