Timber Handbook 5 Part 130418
Timber Handbook 5 Part 130418
ISBN: 978-1-902696-84-3
Title: The Structural Use of Timber - Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Citation: Jacob, M., Harrington, J., Robinson, B. 2018. The Structural Use of Timber - Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1.
COFORD, Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Dublin.
© COFORD, 2018
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by
any means electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission
from COFORD.
Dedicated to the memory of
James Harrington
in recognition of his contribution
to the structural use of Irish timber
and his work in timber standards.
The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................iii
Disclaimer..................................................................................................................iv
1 General............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Eurocode 5 in the Eurocode family.................................................................... 1
1.2 National Annexes and nationally determined parameters.................................. 1
1.3 Eurocode 1 - Actions on structures..................................................................... 2
1.4 Eurocode 0 – Basis of structural design............................................................. 2
1.5 The Construction Products Regulation (CPR).................................................... 3
1.6 Execution of timber structures............................................................................ 5
Annex J – References........................................................................................ 81
Foreword | i
Foreword
In line with the growing level of harvest from Irish forests, Irish sawmilling output has increased
substantially, and was close to one million cubic metres in 2016. Kiln dried, graded structural
timber has accounted for most of the increase, and amounts to more than half of sawmill output.
Allied to the increasing levels of sawnwood production in Ireland, there is growing realisation
of the many benefits of wood in construction, including a material that facilitates rapid, modern and
modular construction, and one that has signifcant potential to reduce the level of greenhouse gas
emissions associated with traditional construction methods. Timber buildings, also of course, store
carbon over extended periods and this role in climate change mitigation can only increase over the
coming decades.
Underpinning the use of timber in construction is Eurocode 5 Part 1-1 and associated CEN
loading and product standards. Since the first edition of the COFORD Handbook on structural
design to Eurocode 5, published in 2006, a large amount of new information has become available
which is needed by a structural engineer when designing timber buildings.
The many amendments to product standards resulting from the introduction of the Construction
Products Regulation in July 2013 are included. In addition a strong emphasis has been given to
providing more technical information, mainly through tables, in this edition making the handbook
more user friendly.
Information on cross laminated timber has been added to coincide with the spectacular rise in
the use of this wood product in timber construction.
A new section gives information on the adhesives and the related product standards which are
common to many glued timber products, including CLT.
I am confident that this handbook will help many more structural engineers and specifiers who
are new to timber construction to specify with confidence timber and timber products in their
client’s buildings.
Introduction
Eurocode 5 was first published as a European standard in 2004; amendments appeared in 2006, 2008
and 2014. Major reviews of most parts of all the Eurocodes have already been done by CEN TC 250.
Working groups and project teams under CEN TC 250/SC 5 are busily developing the so called “second-
generation” Eurocode 5, with the new Eurocodes scheduled to appear in 2020.
Since 2004 many of the product standards and related standards have been amended, some extensively.
The Construction Products Regulation came into effect in 2013 and this led to more revisions of most of
the harmonised European product standards. The rapid increase and extraordinary development in the
use of cross-laminated timber (CLT) took place after 2004. Thus, no particular rules for the design of
CLT members are included in the current Eurocode 5.
Facing the task of designing a structural timber member or a complex timber structure, the structural
engineer has Eurocode 5 to hand and a lot of other information. The aim of this handbook is to summarize
some of that other information into a single source.
Like the first edition of the handbook, this second edition is not a commentary on Eurocode 5 Part
1-1 dealing with every topic; instead the focus is on providing useful information on the numerous solid
timber and wood-based panel products and, also, on fasteners and connectors. Rather than wait the
three to four years for the second-generation Eurocodes to be published, it was decided to prepare this
second edition now, in 2017. This allows the many changes that have already taken place since 2004 to
be addressed in this edition.
A strong emphasis has been given to providing more tables in this second edition. The aim is that
once familiar with the text, the user may be able to simply use the tables for everyday work.
Generally, the requirements in the current EN 1995-1-1 are not repeated here, except in some
instances. One of the exceptions is the inclusion of the tables on the effects of material variability, load-
duration and moisture content.
Many of the requirements for adhesives for the different types of joint are common to finger jointed
timber, glued laminated products and cross laminated timber, and so information for the designer and
the specifier are dealt with in a new separate section.
The production requirements for curved glulam or curved cross laminated members are not included;
for these the designer is referred to EN 14080 and EN 16351.
Fire can start, develop and spread in any building and designing the structure to continue to provide
support and separation for the required fire resistance period is essential. EN 1995-1-1 deals with the
design of timber structure in normal conditions; the design of structural timber in a fire situation is
covered in a different part, EN 1995-1-2. As in the first edition, this handbook only covers design in
normal conditions.
References to a current European standard are generally without the year of publication; however,
the relevant current standards related to the use of EN 1995-1-1 are listed in different categories in
Annex J, where the year of publication is given.
iv | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Disclaimer
Although care has been taken to ensure, to the best of our knowledge, that all data and information
contained in this handbook are accurate to the extent that they relate to either matters of fact or accepted
practice or matters of opinion at the time of publication, the authors assume no responsibility for any
errors in or misinterpretations of such data and/or information or any loss or damage arising from or
related to their use.
Conventions
• Blue text is used for references to headings, tables or pages in this handbook
• Ordinary text is used for references to clauses, tables or equations in the EN or document which is
being discussed in a paragraph
• Italics are used for references to clauses, equations or tables in EN 1995-1-1
• All of the European Standards referred to are also Irish Standards. For brevity, the letters I.S. have
been omitted from the standard names but are included in the lists of standards in Annex I
Abbreviations
1 General
There are ten Eurocodes covering the structural design of structures and the actions on them:
EN 1990 Eurocode 0: Basis of Structural Design
EN 1991 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures
EN 1992 Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures
EN 1993 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures
EN 1994 Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures
EN 1995 Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures
EN 1996 Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures
EN 1997 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design
EN 1998 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance
EN 1999 Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures
EN 1990 gives the basis of structural design for the design codes (EN 1992 to EN 1999); EN 1991 gives
the actions on structures (loadings) to be used with the design codes.
The design codes are spilt into a number of parts (usually at least three) dealing with various design
aspects; Part 1-1 gives general rules and rules for buildings, Part 1-2 gives information on fire design,
Part 2 covers bridges and Part 3 deals with specific items. EN 1995 (i.e. Eurocode 5) consists of three
separate sections; Parts 1-1, 1-2 and 2.
All of the Eurocodes mentioned so far are required to have National Annexes (NA). While each standard
is exactly the same in each member state, it is allowed to have some nationally determined parameters
(NDP) which are included in a National Annex. In the foreword of each Eurocode the clauses through
which national choices are allowed are listed; notes within the main body of the Eurocode indicate
where the choices are permitted and recommendations are usually given where there are options.
Other European standards exist to provide support to the design standards; these include topics
such as testing, strength grading, preservative treatment and various product standards. A number of
these standards can be supported by other standards for example some of the testing standards related to
timber grading have standards covering the calculation of characteristic values.
All the standards sit within a committee framework; committees deal with amendments, revisions
and the development of standards. Going from bottom to top there is usually a technical or task group
(TG), then a working group (WG) and above this the plenary committee; the TGs report to the WGs and
the WGs to the plenary committee, all of which is overseen by the European Commission.
Eurocode 5 is simply another design standard within the European family with its own supporting
standards etc. It is similar to the steel, concrete and masonry codes in this context.
2 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
EN 1991 gives the actions, including the many types of loads, and thermal actions, which building
structures and bridges may be required to support. The requirements for combinations of these actions
are given in EN 1990. EN 1991 has ten separate parts:
• EN 1991-1-1, Actions on structures - Part 1-1: General actions - Densities, self-weight, imposed
loads for buildings
• EN 1991-1-2, Actions on structures - Part 1-2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire
• EN 1991-1-3, Actions on structures - Part 1-3: General actions - Snow loads
• EN 1991-1-4, Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions
• EN 1991-1-5, Actions on structures - Part 1-5: General actions - Thermal actions
• EN 1991-1-6, Actions on structures - Part 1-6: General actions - Actions during execution
• EN 1991-1-7, Actions on structures - Part 1-7: General actions - Accidental actions
• EN 1991-2, Actions on structures - Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges
• EN 1991-3, Actions on structures - Part 3: Actions induced by cranes and machinery
• EN 1991-4, Actions on structures - Part 4: Silos and tank
This is the leading Eurocode and establishes principles and requirements related to:
Eurocode 0 makes certain assumptions regarding personnel including that design is undertaken by
appropriately qualified and experienced personnel and that factory and site personnel also have the
appropriate level of skill and experience. It also assumes that adequate levels of supervision and quality
control are provided for execution of the works in design, factories and site.
The Eurocode further assumes that the construction products and materials are as specified in
the relevant design standards, execution, material or product standards and that the structure will be
adequately maintained and used in accordance with the design assumptions.
• Permanent – e.g. the self-weight of components or structures, fixed equipment and indirect actions
caused by shrinkage or uneven settlement
• Variable - e.g. imposed loads on floors walls, roofs, wind loads and snow loads
• Accidental – e.g. explosions or vehicles.
Guidance is given on the nature of different characteristic actions as well as how to modify different
variable actions and combinations of variable actions:
The combination value is usually used for persistent or transient situations (fundamental combinations
i.e. the common design case). The Ψ0Qk factor is applied to the secondary variable actions, each variable
action is considered as the primary action in turn with the other variable loads considered as secondary
loads.
For accidental designs, the Ψ1Qk variable load is used for the primary variable action and Ψ2Qk for
the secondary variable loads; again each variable load is considered as a primary load. The use of Ψ1
for the primary variable load, rather than Ψ2 is a national choice and is specified in the National Annex
to EN 1991-1-2.
Following the introduction of the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) in July 2013 it is now
mandatory that all construction products which are covered by a harmonised European standard have
a Declaration of Performance (DoP) and are CE marked. If a manufacturer has a European Technical
Assessment (ETA) he must also have a DoP and CE mark his product. Under the CPR, if there is no
harmonised product standard and/or the manufacturer does not have an ETA, then he cannot issue a DoP
or CE mark the product.
The first harmonized standard for timber products was EN 13986 - Wood Based Panels for Use
in Construction, published in 2002. The following are the principal harmonized European product
standards for timber products relevant for designing to EN 1995-1-1:
The Official Journal of the European Union and the European commission publishes a list of harmonised
standards on www. ec.europa.eu.
The requirements for ETAs can be found on the European Organisation for Technical Approvals
(EOTA) website; www.eota.eu. ETAs are based on European Assessment Documents (EAD) which are
slowly replacing the ETAGs (European Technical Approval Guidelines), though some ETAGs are still
valid. European Technical Approvals were originally a way of providing a uniform specification for
products where there was no European or harmonised standard; it was a voluntary assessment procedure
and companies did not have to go down the ETA route. However, once a company has an ETA then they
must have a DoP and CE mark their product.
The CPR lays down seven Basic Requirements for Construction Works and states that construction
products must be fit for their intended use and take into account the health and safety of persons
involved in the works:
The basic works requirements are reflected in the essential characteristics which are contained
in the CE marking section of the harmonised specification. The CE mark cannot be applied until the
manufacturer has drawn up a Declaration of Performance (DoP).
The DoP gives the performance levels of the essential characteristics that the manufacturer wishes
to declare. It should list all the essential characteristics; if no performance level is declared then NPD
(no performance determined) may be placed against the essential characteristic, but the performance of
at least one essential characteristic is required to be declared.
All product standards tend to have marking requirements but harmonised product standards have
both marking requirements and CE marking requirements.
The manufacturer has sole responsibility for the DoP and CE marking. However, under certain
circumstances other economic operators (a term which relates to the supply and distribution of construction
products and can include manufacturers, importers, distributors and authorised representatives) have to
take over these responsibilities.
Importers may only put construction products on the market that comply with the CPR. They should
ensure that the manufacturer has drawn up a DoP and has affixed the CE mark. The importer should check
General | 5
that the DoP has been drafted in accordance with the model in Annex III (amended) of the CPR, and that
the product bears a mark allowing its identification and that of the manufacturer. Importers also need to
ensure that instructions and safety information accompany any product. They should also ensure that the
conformity of the product is not changed while under their control e.g. by storage or transport conditions.
Distributors need to make sure that, where required, the construction product has the CE mark
and other appropriate documents required by the CPR (including the DoP); this extends to product
identification and details of the manufacturer. The specific obligations of manufacturers can apply to
importers and distributors where they place a product on the market under their own name or trademark
or where they modify a construction product already placed on the market in such a way that the DoP
is affected. Care also needs to be taken in relation to the effects of such a change on the requirement of
the AVCP and the CE mark.
An authorised representative should not draw up any technical documentation (including a DoP)
and may only perform the duties set out in a written agreement between the manufacturer and the
representative. However, the authorised representative should keep copies of the technical documentation
(including the DoP and CE mark) and make such documentation available where required, especially for
the national surveillance authorities.
The declared performances in the DoP and CE mark should be the same; one performance cannot be
declared in one without being declared in the other and of course, the values should match.
A DoP can be generic and placed on a website. In some cases, this means that the DoP may not
give much useful information; e.g. as in the case of roof trusses where the calculations and drawings
(required by EN 14250 to be provided by the manufacturer) would provide essential information.
Standards have specific requirements and these should be fulfilled as well as the requirements for
providing a DoP and CE mark. The DoP and CE mark declare performance levels of the essential
characteristics but it is up to the user/specifier to ensure that these levels are adequate for the intended
use.
At time of writing, there are standards for the execution of steel structures (EN 1090) and concrete
structures (EN 13670), but none for timber structures. A draft execution standard is currently being
developed by WG 9, a working group under CEN TC 250/SC 5.
In general, it is proposed to give the minimum requirements for fabrication, assembly, transport,
and erection of timber structures, which are designed in accordance with EN 1995, to ensure that a
completed structure is as the designer intended in terms of its strength, stability, and durability.
To achieve the above it is proposed to include in the standard:
• The permitted tolerances for fabricated elements including for: member dimensions, fastener hole
sizes and location, cutting and machining, and components such as floor, roof and wall elements
• The allowed erection tolerances at a reference moisture content
• The requirements for moisture content control of timber and timber products during execution
• The requirement for the preparation of fabrication method statements
• The requirements for the preparation of method statements for transport, handling and erection of
the structural members and components
• A list of information which should be provided in a project specification on execution.
6 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
2.1 General
Solid timber and glued solid timber products are generally used for beams, columns (or posts), ties,
beam-columns and frames, and trusses. These glued solid timber products include:
When the above structural units form a continuous layer within the external envelope of a building (i.e.
in external walls, roofs and suspended ground floors) the designer of the whole envelope needs more
performance characteristics than those required just for the structural design of the unit.
Manufacturers of wood-based panels usually determine and declare these additional performance
characteristics because it is more than likely the panel may be used as a layer within a wall, floor or roof
construction. Information and requirements for wood-based panel products are in Section 3.
The current harmonised European product standards for solid timber and glued solid timber products are:
EN 14081-1, Timber structures – Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section – Part
1: General requirements
EN 15497, Structural finger jointed solid timber – Performance requirements and minimum production
requirements
EN 14080, Timber structures – Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber – Requirements
EN 14374, Timber structures – Structural laminated veneer lumber – Requirements
EN 16351, Timber structures – Cross laminated timber – Requirements (status as a harmonised EN is
imminent).
To design a structural timber member in a building to comply with Eurocode 5, the engineer needs to know
the strength and stiffness properties and the density of the proposed material, and the cross-section dimensions
and lengths of the products normally available on the market. For example, a beam in a finished building has
normally been designed and specified by the designer, made by a manufacturer and installed by a builder.
Using the available standards or technical specifications, the designer/specifier specifies the beam; the builder
buys the beam from the manufacturer.
Solid timber and glued solid timber products | 7
If the beam is straight and of uniform cross-section the designer/specifier typically specifies at least
• the required strength and stiffness of the material - usually using strength classes
• the breadth and depth
• the allowed maximum deviations from the specified dimensions
• the allowed maximum deviations from straightness
• the maximum moisture content of the timber at delivery to the building site
• the use class in accordance with EN 335 where preservative treatment is required.
The manufacturer makes such a beam in accordance with the requirements of a harmonised product standard
or a European Assessment Document, declares the various values in a DoP, CE marks it and sells it.
The strength and stiffness values for the materials/products listed above are not included in EN
1995-1-1. The information the designer needs for each product is presented below.
EN 14081-1 is a harmonised product standard which governs the strength grading of structural timber;
the standard was revised and published in 2016, but at time of writing has not been referenced in the
OJEU, which means that the previous version (2005 + A1: 2011) still applies. The standard gives some
rules for visually graded timber; national standards (such as I.S. 127) are still required for visual strength
grading. Machine grading usually assigns timber directly to a strength class while visually graded timber
is usually graded to either general structural (GS) or special structural (SS) grade and then assigned to
a strength class using EN 1912. A manufacturer may produce a special “grade” (for example TR26)
and give the performances of the essential characteristics in a Declaration of Performance provided
this is undertaken according to EN 14081-1. For the vast majority of designs the design characteristic
properties for solid timber will be taken from EN 338.
Strength and stiffness values and densities for three different strength class systems, C classes, T
classes and D classes are found in EN 338 in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively. According to 6.2.2, a timber
population may be assigned to a strength class if the following values equal or exceed the strength class
values in Table 1, 2, or 3:
A summary of the strength class system is given in Table A.1. Solid timber boards may be machine
graded directly into one of the C, T, or D strength classes.
The above three values are determined from tests results and apart from shear strength and some
tension perpendicular to grain strengths, which are constant values, all the remaining values in Tables 1,
2 or 3 in EN 338 are calculated using equations in Table 2 in EN 384; Table A.2 demonstrates how the
values are determined for strength class C16.
Home-grown softwood in the Republic of Ireland is most commonly graded into strength classes
C14, C16 and C18 (about 95 % into C16) and imported whitewood is generally available in strength
classes C16 and C24 and by special order in C27. Strength and stiffness values and densities for the
8 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
above strength classes are included in Table A.3. The values in Tables 1, 2 and 3, and Tables A.1, A.2
and A.3 are for timber with an average moisture content of 12 % (equilibrium moisture content at 20°C
and 65 %RH).
Dried solid softwood timber with an average moisture content of 20 % is referred to as dry timber
(according to EN 14081-1). The target size is defined in EN 336 as the cross-section size corrected to
20 % moisture content and is the size that is specified by the engineer in the structural specification or
on the structural drawings. The engineer also specifies the tolerance class according to EN 336 as either
Tolerance class 1 or 2; Table A.4 shows the permitted deviations in the two tolerance classes.
For solid structural timber members in both Service class SC 1 and SC 2 environments, the target
breadth and depth of timber (with a rectangular cross-section) are used by the engineer when calculating
the section modulus or the moment of inertia. The characteristic strength, stiffness and density values
used by the engineer in his calculations are normally those given for the selected strength class in one of
the tables in EN 338. Justification for using these values, which are stated as being for solid timber with
an average moisture content of 12 %, is given below.
In the ultimate limit state (where kcrit is equal to 1,0), the ultimate bending stress is required to be less
than the design bending strength, fm,d , which is found from
𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘"'$
𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓",$ = . 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓",+
𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾)
where
kmod is a strength modification factor for service classes and load-duration classes
γ M is a partial factor for a material property: 1,3 for solid timber
fm,k is the characteristic bending strength for a strength class from EN 338
In Table 3.1 in EN 1995-1-1 (also given in Table D.4), kmod has the same value for service class SC 1
and SC 2 for all load-duration classes. Therefore, according to EN 1995-1-1, the design bending strength
should be taken as being the same for solid timber with average moisture contents of 12 or 20 %.
Madsen et al [1] found that the effect of moisture content in bending was highly strength dependant,
and for strengths of less than 20 N/mm2, bending strengths decreased as the moisture content reduced.
This is the opposite of what was assumed in the past: i.e. bending strength increased as moisture content
decreased. The ultimate bending capacity of a timber member should theoretically reduce with decrease in
moisture content due to shrinkage and the resulting smaller cross-section size, but most engineers ignore
this in their calculations nor is it a requirement of EN 1995-1-1 to take the reduction in size into account.
For a change of moisture content from 20 to 12 %, ignoring the size reduction is effectively allowing an
increase in design bending strength of approximately 6 %.
Madsen et al also found in [1] that the mean modulus of elasticity values (E-values) increased
with decreasing moisture content, but found practically no change in the bending stiffness because the
increase in E-value was offset by the reduction in moment of inertia due to shrinkage. The latter appears
to justify the use of the E-values from the tables in EN 338 for solid timber in Service class SC 1 without
correcting the cross-section size for the change in moisture content from 20 to 12 %.
The permitted deviations from target sizes for softwood and hardwood species are given for two
tolerance classes, 1 and 2, in Tables 1 and 2, respectively in EN 336. Table A.4 shows the permitted
deviations in the two tolerance classes. The target size of a piece of sawn or prepared square-edged
timber is defined as the specified cross-section size at the reference moisture content, 20 %.
To check if the cross-section dimensions of a piece of solid softwood timber are within the permitted
Solid timber and glued solid timber products | 9
deviations, the dimensions must first be corrected to the reference moisture content, 20 %, assuming
a 0,25 % decrease or increase in dimension for every 1 % change in moisture content unless a more
accurate dimension change rate is known for the timber. Hardwoods should be adjusted by 0,35 % for
every 1 % change in moisture content.
Example
The floor joists in a floor are specified as 44 mm thick and 200 mm wide and Tolerance class 2 (according
to EN 336). The average moisture content of one piece is 16 % and its thickness and width are measured
as 42 and 197 mm, respectively. Is the target size within the permitted deviations of Tolerance class 2?
The target thickness and width at 20 % moisture content are calculated and found to be 42,4 and 199,0
mm respectively. From Table A.4, it can be seen the target width is within the permitted deviation (200
– 1,5 = 198,5) but not the thickness (44 – 1 = 43).
The performance and minimum production requirements for structural finger jointed timber are given
in the harmonised product standard EN 15497. The standard covers finger jointed timber made from
sixteen softwood species (including Norway spruce, European silver fir (Fir), Sitka spruce, Scots pine
and European larch) and poplar. The full list of species is given in 5.2.2 and in Table F.1 in Annex F.
The finger jointed timber is required to consist of only one species, but Norway spruce and Fir may be
considered as being one species.
The solid timber used to make finger jointed timber is required to be strength graded to EN 14081-1
into one of the strength classes in EN 338 or a manufacturer’s specific strength class. The strength and
stiffness values and density values of the finger jointed timber are the same as those for the strength class
of the timber from which it is made.
The characteristic bending strength of the finger joints is required to be equal to or to exceed the
characteristic bending strength of the solid timber. Both the strength class of the timber and the characteristic
bending strength of the finger joints are declared in the DoP. The finger joints are required to be tested in
accordance with Annex C in EN 15497. If the timber is preservative treated, only treatments according
to 4.5 in EN 15228 which do not affect the strength and stiffness properties of the timber should be used.
The recommended finger lengths and geometries for the finger joints are given in Annex G as well as
the moisture content requirements. The moisture content of the two pieces being joined must not differ
by more than 5 % and must be between 7 and 18 %.
Glued laminated timber (glulam) members with rectangular cross-section are manufactured in accordance
with EN 14080 by gluing kiln-dried planed solid timber pieces together in a controlled factory environment.
The standard covers glued laminated timber made from sixteen softwood species (including Norway
spruce, Fir, Sitka spruce, Scots pine and European larch) and poplar. The full list of species is given in 5.5.2
and in Table F.1 in Annex F. EN 14080 gives the performance requirements not only for glued laminated
timber but also for glued solid timber, glulam with large finger joints and block glued glulam. Each of the
structural glued timber products are defined below.
10 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
where
lCOR is the corrected dimension in mm.
la is the actual size
k is the swelling/shrinkage factor (called “deformation” factor in Table 14 - a misnomer)
k = 0,0025 in perpendicular-to-grain directions (average of radial and tangential)
k = 0,0001 in parallel-to-grain direction
(above are valid for coniferous wood and poplar within 6 – 25 % MC range)
uref is the reference moisture content = 12 %
ua is the actual moisture content in % measured according to Annex G in EN 14080.
Table A.8 shows corrected dimensions for a range of depths or widths of glulam assuming the nominal
dimension is the dimension at the reference moisture content, 12 %.
Currently there are two European standards for the use of LVL, EN 14279 and EN 14374. However,
in a proposed amended EN, prEN 14374 (published for the CEN Enquiry process in May 2016) it
is proposed to combine and update the contents of both current ENs into a new harmonised product
standard. Publication of the new standard, or an amended version of it, is imminent (the designer is
advised to check the current status of the prEN). The two current standards and the prEN are:
• EN 14279: 2004 + A1: 2009, Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) – Definitions, classification and
specifications
• EN 14374: 2004, Timber structures – Structural laminated veneer lumber – Requirements
• prEN 14374: 2016, Timber structures – Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) – Requirements.
The current EN 14279 was prepared by CEN TC 112 – Wood-based panels, the technical committee
which prepares the ENs for wood-based panels, whereas the current EN 14374 was prepared by CEN
TC 124 – Timber structures.
It appears that when LVL is manufactured for use as floor or roof panels (or decking) the assessment
and verification of constancy of performance (AVCP) should be carried out using I.S. EN 13986, the
same standard that is used for the AVCP of plywood, orientated strand board, particleboard and fibreboard
panels. However, LVL members which are subjected to bending moment about the weak-axis (called
“flatwise bending”), are also included in the scope of EN 14374 and the AVCP may be carried out using
the latter because it is a harmonized product standard. Having one harmonized product standard for all
LVL products, as proposed in the prEN, will remove the current overlap between the two standards.
12 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
LVL is manufactured with and without cross layers. Swelling/shrinkage is reduced by cross layers.
Swelling/shrinkage factors for one of manufacturer’s products are given in their product literature.
These are given in Table A.11 to show the designer the order of the factor he/she would expect to find
for LVL of the two different types.
The use of cross-laminated timber has increased dramatically since the publication of Eurocode 5 in
2004. This material is not included in the current EN 1995-1-1, nor are particular rules given for its
structural use. However, proposed rules for the design of CLT members are currently being developed
for the second-generation Eurocodes and the product standard EN 16351 was published in 2015.
Publication of the latter has not yet been listed in the OJEU, but once it has it will become a harmonised
EN. Manufacturers are currently using the European Assessment Document EAD 130005-00-0304 [2]
as the basis for obtaining European Technical Assessments for their CLT products.
CLT is mainly used for floor, roof and wall plates. A plate is defined here as a structural element which
has no protrusions on either of the two largest parallel flat surfaces. The stresses and strains occurring in
a CLT plate depend on how it is loaded. The plates are usually loaded mainly in one direction at a time,
but can also be loaded in two directions at the same time. A CLT floor plate supporting vertical loads
is loaded in a direction perpendicular to the CLT, whereas a CLT wall plate acting as a shear wall in a
building is loaded in the plane of the CLT.
The strength and stiffness of the CLT when subjected to load in either of the above directions is
usually calculated from (a) the strength and stiffness values of the solid timber boards used to make up
the layers, and (b) the geometry of the cross section. It is assumed that:
• the glued joints are rigid and the shear and tensile strength of the bonding is always stronger than
that of the timber being joined, and
• the characteristic bending and tensile strengths of the finger joints in the boards are stronger than
those of the timber.
The manufacturer may use solid timber boards which have been graded into a strength class in EN 338,
either from Table 1 (C classes) or Table 2 (T classes) or he may test samples of the solid timber and
determine the characteristic strengths and mean stiffnesses from the test results. Some of the strength
and stiffness properties of the timber needed to calculate the strength and stiffness of the CLT are not
Solid timber and glued solid timber products | 13
provided in the EN 338 tables, and these must be determined from test results or from values that can
be assumed without testing. The requirements for the latter are currently given in the EAD 130005-00-
0304. The additional values include:
In European Technical Approvals or Assessments (ETAs) for CLT the following three declared values
are found to be generally lower than those given in Tables 1 or 2 in EN 338
• Characteristic tension strength perpendicular to the grain (for load perpendicular to plate)
• Mean shear modulus parallel to grain (for load in plane of plate)
• Characteristic shear strength parallel to grain (for load in plane of plate).
A review of some current ETAs shows that some manufacturers are testing the modulus of elasticity
parallel to the grain of the graded solid timber and are taking advantage of the higher mean values
determined from the test results (higher than those in EN 338).
With no harmonized product standard in place, manufacturers have so far obtained ETAs for their CLT
products in order to comply with the CPR. Most recent assessments have been made in accordance with
EAD 130005-00-0304. An ETA for a product is valid for 5 years after it is obtained and so ETAs to EAD
130005-00-0304 will continue to be valid for up to 5 years after EN 16351 is published in the OJEU.
Because of its alternating arrangement of longitudinal and cross layers, the bending stiffness about an
axis parallel to the cross layers (the y-axis), is greater than that about an axis parallel to the longitudinal
layers (the x-axis).
For verifications in the ultimate limit state the section modulus may be calculated using the net
cross-section ignoring the shear flexibility of the cross layers, whereas for the serviceability limit states
the shear flexibility is taken account of in the effective cross-sectional values.
The simplified method in Annex B of EN 1995-1-1 (also known as the Gamma method) can be adapted
to CLT cross sections. The method in the current EC5 is for mechanically jointed beams and for cross-
sections with two or three parts connected to each other with fasteners and can be used to calculate:
• Maximum normal stresses at top and bottom edges of the cross-section using Equations (B.7) and (B.8)
• Maximum shear stress in the middle, or next to middle longitudinal layer using Equation (B.9)
• Maximum horizontal load on a fastener using Equation (B.10)
• Effective bending stiffness using Equations (B.1 to B.6). The slip modulus for the ultimate limit state
is Ku which equals 2/3 Kser.
The Gamma method in Annex B in EN 1995-1-1 may be applied to a CLT cross-section by replacing the
fasteners between the connected parts with the flexible cross layers in the CLT element. The term si /Ki
in Equation (B.5) is replaced by di /G . b. The amended equation (B.5) becomes
where
di is the thickness of the cross layer boards
G is the shear modulus of the cross layer board perpendicular to the grain
b is the width of the glued joint between the cross layer board and the longitudinal board
d1 is the thickness of the cross layer board between the top and second layers of longitudinal boards,
d3 is the thickness of the cross layer board between the second and bottom layers of longitudinal boards.
The same value of G equal to 50 N/mm2 is recommended in EAD 130005-00-0304 when calculating the
effective stiffness in both limit states.
Using the amended γi in Equation (B.10) the maximum horizontal shear force perpendicular to a single
cross layer board may be calculated. The design shear strength in this case is the characteristic rolling
shear strength fv,9090,k (or fR,k) multiplied by kmod and divided by γM.
For cross sections with more than three longitudinal layers, for example seven or nine layer CLT,
a modified Gamma method (called the extended Gamma method) may be used. The latter and the
alternative shear-flexible Timoshenko beam method are described in [3]. The Timoshenko beam method
is preferred in the CLT floor plate design software provided by one of the manufacturers.
A review of the content of some of the more recently obtained ETAs for CLT products shows the
variations between products made by each manufacturer. Table A.13 compares some of the dimensions
and specifications of two manufacturers for their CLT products.
In both EAD 130005-00-0304 and in the new EN 16351, CLT may be used in Service classes 1 and
2 environments.
• All boards edge-bonded in each layer, or less than 6 mm wide gaps between board edges
• Some wood-based panel layers with thicknesses of 6 to 45 mm (without edge bonding).
The adhesives and bonding requirements for finger joints in solid timber boards, joints between layers,
board to board edge joints and large finger joints are included in the standard. Large finger joints between
CLT elements are covered by the standard where the joined pieces:
• Have the same cross section and layups; and only solid timber layers
• Are 51 to 345 mm thick; outermost layers are not less than 17 mm thick
• Have finger joints with at least 45 mm long fingers
• Are joined with the grain directions in the surface boards lining up (with x-axis).
Section 5 in EN 16351 gives the requirements for the product CLT and its components.
NOTE: In 2.2.1.6 in EAD 130005-00-0304 the manufacturer is required to declare the manufacturing
tolerances of the CLT element in accordance with the “applicable specifications” of EN 336. In one of the
manufacturers’ ETAs assessed to the above EAD, the declared tolerances on the cross-section dimensions
are within the maximum deviations for tolerance class 2 in EN 336, however, it is not stated in the EAD
or in the ETA how the dimensions should be corrected to a reference moisture content or to what reference
moisture content. The reference moisture content in EN 336 is 20 % and is 12 % in EN 16351.
In the latest working draft of the proposed new rules for the design of CLT in the second-generation
Eurocode 5 (May 2017), different values for the swelling/shrinkage factor may be taken for swelling/
16 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Because of the overlap between the requirements for adhesives in the individual European product
standards for finger jointed solid timber, glued laminated products and cross-laminated timber, the
adhesive products are considered together in this one sub-section. Each of the product standards require
that the adhesives used should provide durable bonds throughout the lifetime of the structure for the
required Service class and that each adhesive can be assigned to an adhesive class in EN 301, EN 14525,
or EN 16254. Adhesives from the three families of adhesives (below) are referred to in the glued product
standards:
1. Phenolic and aminoplastic polycondensation adhesives (MF, MUF, PRF, UF) (I.S. EN 301)
2. One component polyurethane adhesives (PUR) (EN 15425)
3. Emulsion polymer isocyanate adhesives (EPI) (EN 16254).
EN 301, EN 15425 and EN 16254 specify the performance requirements of the adhesives in the three
families. In each of these standards, adhesives are assigned to adhesive classes in a Table 1 (same
table number in each). It is important to note that these standards apply to the adhesive only and not
to the glued timber joint. For example, in the tests to determine the tensile shear strength, the timber
test specimens are always made from beech. It is the adhesive that is being tested not the glued joint
and the requirements in these standards apply to type testing of the adhesives only. Adhesives meeting
the requirements of these standards are adequate for use in load-bearing timber structures only if the
bonding process is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the harmonised product standard.
The bonding process requirements for CLT are, for example, given in Annex I in EN 16351.
Thirteen adhesive classes are specified in Table 1 in EN 301, seven in Table 1 in EN 15425 and nine
in Table 1 in EN 16254.
2.7.2 Sub-classes
Adhesives in the three standards are further allocated to sub-classes related to their use. These sub-
classes are defined in each standard and summarised in Table B.1. The reader should note that the sub-
classes general purpose (GP) and finger jointing (FJ) do not have the same definition in each standard.
Solid timber and glued solid timber products | 17
2.8 Effect of change in moisture content on floor, roof and wall plates
Wall, floor and roof structural units (or plates) are readily made using CLT. LVL may be used in two
forms, either as (a) a single structural member, or (b) as a floor or roof decking. Floor and roof decking
may also be made using glulam planks (glulam installed on its side) and solid timber pieces may be
nailed or stapled (with hardwood dowels or pegs) together to make wall units and floor and roof units.
The effects of swelling of wood particularly in the tangential and radial directions because of change in
moisture content need careful consideration in all the above uses, and definite measures must be taken
to accommodate such swelling. Because of their cross layered construction, the changes in width due to
change in moisture content are less for CLT panels and LVL with cross layers (see Table A.11 for LVL).
The designer/specifier should specify the required maximum and minimum moisture contents of the
specified solid timber or glued solid timber products at time of delivery to the building site.
3.1 General
The wood-based panel products in this section include those used as panels in a load-bearing timber
frame floor, roof and wall constructions. The term construction used here means the whole floor, roof or
wall, including all the layers which make up the total thickness. These constructions may be subjected
to loads applied in directions normal or parallel to the plane of the construction. Normally, only some of
the layers or pieces within the constructions are designed to resist the loads applied to them. For example
in a shear wall, the timber frame and the panel layers fastened to it provide resistance to horizontal load
applied parallel to the plane of the wall (normally referred to as racking resistance).
Panels are subjected to different environments depending on their location within the thickness of a
construction. At any point in time, the moisture content of a wood-based panel depends on the humidity
and temperature history in its local environment. Some local environments vary considerably over time
and others very little. Panels fastened to the top of floor joists in an internal suspended floor are normally
in an environment where the change in the humidity of the air over time is relatively small. In contrast,
panels fastened to the outer face of the timber frame in external wall and roof constructions are often in
local environments where the humidity of the air is higher and fluctuates considerably over time.
For structural purposes three different local environments are defined in EN 1995-1-1. Wood-based
panels in these environments are described as being in one of, Service class 1, 2 or 3. The average
moisture content of softwoods in the three classes is given in Table D.3, but the equivalents for the
different wood-based panel materials are not given in EN 1995-1-1. The designer should obtain the
average moisture contents of wood-based panel materials in service classes SC 1 and SC 2 from the
panel manufacturer. The average moisture content of an oriented strand board type OSB/3 is estimated
to be 16,5 % in service class SC 2, for example, - lower than that for the softwood from which it has been
made. In EN 1995-1-1 there are no limits on the moisture content of wood-based panels fastened to the
outer face of external timber frame walls and roofs, however a limit of 18 % is required in some national
standards in Europe. Limits of 20 % for solid timber products and 18 % for wood-based products are
for untreated products and are to prevent colonisation and damage by wood-destroying fungi. Where a
wood-based panel is installed on the outer face of the timber studs in a timber frame external wall and
is adjacent to a ventilated cavity, the designer should obtain the maximum average moisture content
allowed for untreated panels from the panel manufacturer.
The performance characteristics of wood-based panels are normally given for structural use in dry,
humid, or exterior conditions. In EN 13986 dry, humid, or exterior conditions are defined as being those
corresponding with service classes SC 1, SC 2, or SC 3, respectively.
Where panels fastened to the outer face of the timber frame in a wall construction are used to
provide all or part of the racking resistance of a wall, the designer must decide which local environment
and hence service class is applicable. The design lateral load-carrying capacity of a panel-to-timber
connection for a nail, or staple is adjusted for moisture content through the kmod factor. The values of this
factor for plywood are given in Table D.4, and for other wood-based panels in Table D.5. It can be seen
that no values for kmod are given in Table D.5 for wood-based panels in service class SC 3 environments.
Table C.1 shows where the different wood-based panel products are typically used as structural
elements in buildings.
20 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
It appears product standards for wood-based panel products were prepared by the CEN technical
committee TC 112 and its working groups at different times and by different experts. As a result, there
is no consistent overall classification system which covers all of these products. There are types and
classes and types within classes and some types are classes.
In an effort to present the information on these panel products in this handbook in a more coherent
way the following system is adopted:
1. Plywood, OSB, particleboard and the fibreboards, hardboard, medium board and MDF are all called
products
2. Within each product, variations of the product are allocated to classes
3. Variations within a class are called sub-types (dry, humid and exterior are use condition sub-types)
4. Sub-types include those
(a) Suitable for use in the three environments: dry, humid and exterior
(b) For all load-duration classes, or limited to some
(c) Load-bearing or heavy-duty load-bearing.
Note: Sub-type is deliberately used rather than type, because in some of the classifications in the product
standards, the different classes are called types, for example in section 4 in EN 300: 2006 oriented strand
boards are classified according to four Types, OSB/1, OSB/2 and so on.
The classification of OSB, particleboard and fibreboard panels which are used as structural elements
in either dry or humid conditions is summarized in Table C.2.
Fibreboards are manufactured from lignocellulosic fibres (mainly softwood) and are produced using
either wet or dry production processes. Fibreboards produced by wet processes are classified in EN
316 and in EN 622-2, -3, -4 and -5 according to the density of the panel material. Table C.3 shows this
classification. Fibreboards are classified further according to additional properties and applications; the
classification system and the related symbols are shown in Table C.4.
Examples
MBH.LA2 - High density medium board (MBH) for load-bearing use (L) in dry conditions (no symbol)
in all load-duration categories (A) and a heavy-duty load-bearing board (2).
MDF.HLS – Medium density fibreboard (MDF) for use in humid conditions (H) for load-bearing use (L)
and for instantaneous or short-term load-durations (S).
The performance characteristics for solid wood panels, plywood, LVL, OSB, particleboard, cement-
bonded particleboard and fibreboard are given in EN 13986: 2004 + A1: 2015. This standard gives the
performance characteristics required for each of nine variations of use of the wood-based panel products
in construction. Of these, the five of most interest to the designer using EN 1995, are those used as
structural components:
Wood-based panel products used as structural elements | 21
Tables 1 and 2 list the required performance characteristics for the uses in 1 and 2 above and Table 7 lists
those required for the uses in 3, 4 and 5 in one table. In Table 7 the requirements for durability (moisture
resistance) in clause 5.6 are not required for use in dry conditions and those for strength and stiffness
under point load are required for floor and roof joists only. All the listed requirements in Tables 1 and
2 are included in Table 7 (If a small number of superscripts and footnotes had been added in Table 7,
Tables 1 and 2 could have been omitted from the standard).
EN 13986 also sets out the requirements for assessment and verification of constancy of performance
(AVCP) and for CE marking of wood-based panels.
The means of determining each characteristic are given in each table by reference to the relevant clause
in section 5 in EN 13986. In Table C.5 the tests required or other determining methods are shown for each
of the performance characteristics listed in Table 7 in EN 13986. Table C.5 covers plywood, LVL, OSB,
particleboard (resin bonded and non-extruded) and fibreboard; the designer/specifier is referred to Table 7
and the relevant clauses in EN 13986 for solid wood panels and cement-bonded particleboard.
For all of the panel products in Table C.5 the bending strengths and stiffnesses about the major and
minor axes are tested according to EN 310 and the test results expressed according to EN 326-1. The
resulting values must exceed those given in the relevant table in the panel product standard. For example
for an 11 mm thick OSB/3 panel, the resulting values must exceed those in Table 4 in EN 300 for the
thickness range >10 to <18 mm; for a 12 mm thick P5 particleboard, the resulting values must exceed
those in Table 7 in EN 312 for the thickness range >10 to 13 mm. The relevant standard for fibreboard is
EN 622 and each different product has its own part as follows: hardboards – EN 622-2, Medium boards
– EN 622-3, and MDF – EN 622-5. For an 8 mm thick HB.HLA1 hardboard panel, the resulting values
(of bending strength and stiffness) must exceed those in Table 6 in EN 622-2 for the thickness range >5,5
mm; for a 12 mm thick MDF.HLS panel the resulting values must exceed those in Table 6 in EN 622-5
for the thickness range >9 to 12 mm.
The minimum bending strengths and bending stiffnesses required in the product standards for values
from tests according to EN 310 and EN 326-1 for 12 mm thick panels of OSB/3, P5 particleboard, and
MDF.HLS and MDF.RWH are compared in Table C.6.
The above bending strengths and stiffnesses (determined from tests according to EN 310) should
not be used for design purpose; the values for use in calculations are considered under the next heading.
3.4.1 Plywood
The characteristic strength, stiffness and density values of a plywood can be provided by a manufacturer
in two ways:
22 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
1. Each of the strength and stiffness values for a plywood can be determined from tests according to
EN 789 and characteristic values determined from the test results using EN 1058, or a combination
of calculated values according to EN 14272 and values from test results, or
2. A plywood can be assigned to a class according to EN 636 using Tables 1 and 2 and the characteristic
strength and mean stiffness values obtained using EN 12369-2.
Using the second method a plywood is named by assigning the following properties:
(a) Out-of-plane bending strength about the y-axis, fm,0
(b) Out-of-plane bending strength about the x-axis, fm,90
(c) Modulus of elasticity for bending about the y-axis, Em,0
(d) Modulus of elasticity for bending about the x-axis, Em,90,
into two bending strength classes using Table 1 and two modulus of elasticity classes using Table 2.
The above bending strengths and moduli of elasticity are determined from bending tests according to EN
310 and EN 326-1 with results expressed according to EN 326-2.
Example
Example (not real) bending strength and modulus of elasticity values from tests and test results are
assigned using Table 1 and 2 in Table C.7.
The calculation values are then obtained from the following tables in EN 12369-2
Table 2 Bending, tension and compression strengths from the bending strength F-class
Table 3 Mean moduli of elasticity for bending, tension and compression from the modulus of
elasticity E-class
Table 4 Shear strengths and stiffnesses from the mean density according to EN 323.
The full set of calculation values for the example is shown in Table C.8.
The current versions of the product standards have all been revised since 2001; EN 12369-1: 2001
is in need of revision. Values for medium boards MBH.HLS1 and MBH.HLS2 and medium density
fibreboard MDF.RWH should be included. The latter is currently sold on the market in RoI as a panel
suitable for providing racking resistance, but without a value for the shear modulus for load applied in a
direction parallel to the face (panel shear) the designer cannot calculate one part of the total horizontal
deflection (i.e. shear deflection of the panel).
Wood-based panel products used as structural elements | 23
The characteristic strength, mean stiffness and density values for the above product classes are
presented in Tables C.9 to C.14 (inclusive) but for a smaller range of thicknesses than included in the
tables in EN 12369-1. These tables (C.9 to C.14) also show which values are missing. If the designer
needs these missing values he should contact the product manufacturers.
A wall construction may be an internal or external wall. In both, the wall typically supports floor and
wall loads applied vertically to the top of the wall. In this case the timber studs are axially loaded in
compression and the panels fixed to the studs provide lateral support to the slender stud members. If
the wall provides racking resistance (acts as a shear wall) the panels are subjected to shear forces in the
plane of the panels and the wall studs are subjected to axial loads and resist out-of-plane buckling of the
panels.
Panels within external wall constructions generally have more than one function. For example, the
hygrothermal performance of the construction depends on the water vapour diffusion resistance of the
different layers making up the construction. Many designers require panels with low values of water
vapour diffusion resistance fixed to the outer face of the wall studs. Panels on the outer face of the studs
with better thermal resistance may also be specified.
The primary structural requirements of a panel in a timber frame wall construction are its resistance
to in-plane loads (racking) and the embedment strength of the panel material for laterally loaded dowel-
type fasteners. The lateral deflection of the panel partly depends on the shear stiffness of the panel
material; and the out-of-plane buckling resistance of the panel depends on the 5-percentile modulus of
elasticity of the material for bending about an axis parallel to the wall studs. In Methods A and B in EN
1995-1-1 out-of-plane buckling is limited by requiring that the clear distance between wall studs is less
than or equal to 100 t, where t is the panel thickness.
In all methods of calculating the racking strength of wall constructions, the maximum horizontal
load the wall can resist is directly proportional to the characteristic lateral load-carrying capacity of the
panel-to-timber connection for the fastener used to connect the panels to the timber frame members. To
calculate the capacity the designer needs to know the characteristic embedment strength for a fastener in
the selected wood-based panel material.
Equations are given for calculating the embedment strength in 8.3.1.3 in EN 1995-1-1 for plywood,
hardboard, particleboard and oriented strand board for nailed panel-to-timber connections where the
nail head diameter is at least twice the diameter of the nail. The equations are summarized in Table E.5.
It can be seen that for plywood the embedment strength depends on the density of the plywood and the
diameter of the fastener, whereas for hardboard, particleboard and OSB it depends on the diameter of the
fastener and the thickness of the panel, but not on the density. Due to the manufacturing process, some
panel materials do not have a uniform density through the thickness of the panel and this is the reason
the embedment strength depends on the thickness.
The same equations as above can be used for calculating the lateral load-carrying capacity of stapled
panel-to-timber connections, where the leg diameter is taken as the square root of the product of the
cross-section dimensions and when the pull-through capacity is equal to or greater than that provided
with a head with a diameter of 2 d, where d is the nominal diameter of the nail.
For medium boards (MB) and medium density fibreboards (MDF) no equations are given in EN
1995-1-1. However, in 3.5 (1)P wood-based panels are required to comply with EN 13986 and a
24 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
manufacturer has a number of options when it comes to declaring racking resistance. To determine
racking strength and stiffness of a timber frame wall according to EN 13986 the alternatives in 5.15.3
may be used; in summary, these are:
1. The characteristic racking strength FRd,max,k and the mean stiffness Rmean may be determined from
tests according to EN 594 and these values may be used for walls with the same components and
arrangement as those used in the tests
2. The characteristic lateral load-carrying capacity of a panel-to-timber connection for a particular
combination of fastener and thickness of the panel product may be determined from test results.
In 2 above the selection and preparation of the test specimens and joined pieces are done according to
EN 1380; the test loading procedure is carried out according to EN 26891, and the characteristic lateral
load-carrying capacity is determined from the test results using EN 14358.
The manufacturer may also carry out tests and declare the characteristic embedment strength. The
tests are done according to EN 383 and the characteristic value is determined from the test results using
EN 14358. The characteristic embedment strength is only valid for the type and diameter of the fastener
and the strength class of the timber specimens used in the tests. If C24 timber was used in the tests, for
example, the designer would have to adjust the characteristic load-carrying capacity declared by the
manufacturer when fastening the panel product to C16 timber studs. The characteristic lateral load-
carrying capacity of a nailed panel-to-timber connection can then be calculated using the equations in
8.2.2 in EN 1995-1-1.
In summary, to compare the design racking resistance and mean stiffness of two timber frame shear
walls made with different wood-based panels, the designer needs the following values for each:
• Characteristic lateral load-carrying capacity of the panel-to-timber connection for the same one
fastener type, or
• Characteristic embedment strength for one fastener type
• Shear stiffness or shear modulus of the panel when resisting load in the plane of the panel in the
horizontal direction
• Bending stiffness, EI, for bending out-of-plane of the panel about an axis parallel to the wall studs.
Where a wood-based panel is used as floor or roof decking, it is required to support a uniformly distributed
load or a concentrated load according to EN 1991-1-1 for the specified category of imposed loading. The
concentrated load test and assessment methods are specified in EN 12781.
Effects of material variability, load-duration and moisture content | 25
The design strength of a material or the design resistance of a connection are found by multiplying
the characteristic value by the strength modification factor kmod and dividing it by the partial factor for
material property γM:
$&'( $&'(
𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓" = 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓$ . ; 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹," = 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹" .
)* )*
Table D.1 gives the partial factor for material property adjusted to include the requirements of the Irish
NA to EN 1995-1-1.
Load-durations are defined in Table D.2 and examples of types of loading are included in the third
column. The table includes the recommendations in the Irish NA to EN 1996-1-1.
The three service classes defined in 2.3.1.3 in EN 1995-1-1 are shown in Table D.3.
4.4 Strength modification factors kmod for service and load-duration classes
Values of kmod for different combinations of service class and load-duration class are given for solid timber,
glulam, LVL, plywood and CLT in Tables D.4 and for OSB, particleboard and fibreboard in Table D.5.
Note 1: The values given for CLT are those recommended in the most recent draft rules submitted to
CEN TC 250/SC 5 at time of writing.
Note 2: For many of the product classes in Table D.5 values of kmod are only given for Service class 1;
none are given for Service class 3.
Values of the modification factor kdef for solid wood, glulam, LVL, plywood and CLT in different service
classes are given in Tables D.6 and D.7.
Note: The values given for CLT are those recommended in the most recent draft rules submitted to CEN
TC 250/SC 5 at time of writing.
26 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Treating timber with a preservative can be an effective low-cost method of extending the service life of
timber and timber products. However, some timbers have a natural durability that may be perfectly well
suited for their intended use. There are many sources of information that can help a designer decide on
whether treatment is necessary or if the natural durability of the timber is adequate.
Environments are allocated to Use classes in EN 335 “Durability of wood and wood-based products
- Use classes: definitions, application to solid wood and wood-based products”. A designer must first
determine the environment where the component is to be used. The use classes are defined below.
• Use class 1 (UC 1) - wood or wood-based products are inside a construction and not exposed to the
weather and wetting. Insect attack might be possible.
In this environment the moisture content of solid wood is such that the risk of attack by surface
moulds or by staining or wood-destroying fungi is insignificant (the wood would have a moisture
content of a maximum of 20 % in any part of the component for practically the whole of its service
life). Examples include internal joinery, dry roofs and internal floor timbers.
• Use class 2 (UC 2) - wood or wood-based products are under cover and not exposed to the weather
(especially rain) but where occasional, but not persistent wetting may occur. Condensation of water
on the surface of the wood may occur; insect attack might be possible.
In this environment the moisture content of solid wood occasionally exceeds 20 %, either in the whole
or only in part of the component. This might allow attack by wood-destroying fungi. Examples include
roof timbers where there is a risk of wetting, timber frame external wall panels and ground floor joists.
• Use class 3 (UC 3) - wood or wood-based products are above ground and are exposed to the weather.
• Use class 3.1 (UC 3.1) – where the wood or wood based product will not remain wet for long
periods; water will not accumulate.
Use class 3.2 (UC 3.2) – where the wood or wood based product will remain wet for long periods
and water may accumulate.
In this environment the moisture content of solid wood can be expected to exceed 20 % frequently,
and thus it will often be liable to attack by wood-destroying fungi. Examples include external joinery,
decking boards and joists and cladding.
• Use class 4 (UC 4) - wood or wood-based products are in direct contact with the ground or fresh water.
Durability of timber, timber products and wood-based panels | 27
In this environment the moisture content of solid wood would be expected to exceed 20 % permanently
and would be liable to attack by wood-destroying fungi. The above-ground (or above-water) portion
of certain components, for example fence posts, may be attacked by wood-boring beetles. Examples
include fence posts, poles and sleepers.
• Use class 5 (UC 5) - wood or wood-based product are permanently or regularly sub-merged in salt
or brackish water.
In this environment the moisture content of solid wood can be expected to exceed 20 % permanently.
Attack by invertebrate marine organisms is the principal problem, particularly in the warmer waters
where organisms such as Limnoria spp., Teredo spp. and Pholads can cause significant damage. The
above water portion of certain components, for example harbour piles, can be exposed to wood-
boring insects, including termites.
The natural durability of various timber species is given in EN 350:2016 “Durability of wood and wood
based products - Natural durability of solid wood - Guide to natural durability and treatability of selected
wood species of importance in Europe”; EN 350 also gives information on timber treatability.
Natural durability relates to the heartwood and the specified classification relates to the timber being
in ground contact (Use class 4); all sapwood should be regarded as non-durable or perishable. However,
for some species (softwoods especially) the natural durability of heartwood is now considered to be the
same as sapwood: non-durable.
In EN 350 there are five timber durability classes for fungi, DC 1 being very durable and DC 5
being not durable; intermediate classes refer to durable, moderately durable and slightly durable. There
are also durability classes for insect attack (such as longhorn beetle and the common furniture beetle);
termites and marine borers. These classes are summarised in the table below.
Durability class
Durability
Wood-boring Marine
Fungi Termites
beetles organisms
Very durable DC1
Durable DC2 DC D DC D DC D
Moderately durable DC3 DC M DC M
Slightly durable DC4
Not durable DC5 DC S DC S DC S
There are four tables in EN 350 giving the durability of different timbers:
Table B.1 – Durability of heartwood of softwood species
Table B.2 – Durability of temperate hardwood species
Table B.3 – Durability of tropical hardwood species
Table B.4 – Classification of commercial groupings.
28 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
EN Durability of heartwood
Common Density at
No. 13556 Origin
name 12 % MC Fungi Hylotrupes Anobium Termites
code
N America
Sitka 400-440-
14 PCST and 4-5 D S S
spruce 450
Europe
Southern PNEL C/N 400- 450-
17 4 D D S
pine PNTD America 500
Scots pine 500-520- 3-4
24 PNSY Europe D D S
redwood 540 (2-S)
In the above example Sitka spruce is slightly susceptible or susceptible to fungal attack, durable to
Hylotrupes (longhorn beetle), not durable to Anobium (woodworm) or termites.
Information is given in EN 335 on the types of fungi and timber attacking insects.
If a timber species is not referred to in EN 350 then advice on its durability should be sought from
specialists.
The Wood Protection Association (WPA) manual [4] and BS 8417 [5] provide recommendations on
the need for treatment, including guidance on treatment of wood-based panels and engineered wood
products. These documents use some additional considerations outside the European standards including
service factors divided into four classifications:
Treatment can be specified by use class and desired service life, and the above service factors. In the
absence of a stated desired service life, 60 years would normally be assumed. Table 4 in BS 8417
(treatment using preservatives tested in accordance with EN 599-1) gives a number of classifications
based on use class and service factors and treatment details associated with these classifications, some
of these are:
• Timber frame walls are usually considered to be 2C or 2D and are normally treated
• Sole plates above DPC (damp proof course) are assigned to use class 2D, the D signifies that the
timber would be difficult and expensive to replace and therefore treatment is considered essential.
BS 8417 specifies a higher level of treatment specifically for sole plates
• Ground floor joists and associated timbers are usually assigned to use class 2D and are normally
treated
Durability of timber, timber products and wood-based panels | 29
• Roof timbers (dry) are usually considered to be 1B or 1D but if there is a risk of wetting then
2C would be appropriate. Dry roofs are sometimes classified as 2C for treatment purposes as an
assurance against future remedial action.
Treatment details are associated with the desired service life (15, 30 and 60 years); this should be
specified by the client or building designer.
Information should be provided by the treater and should be in accordance with EN 15228. EN 15228
requires the following to be provided:
The charge number could be the actual charge sheet giving detailed information on the treatment.
In considering the need for treatment the costs of timber failure and remedial action should be
considered; treatment is usually relatively inexpensive and can significantly extend the life of a
component. Some standards specify components that have to be treated (e.g. I.S. 440 “Timber Frame
Construction, Dwellings and Other Buildings”).
The service classes in EN 1995-1-1 are based on the moisture content of timber, which is related to the
relative humidity. Service class 1 approximates to Use class 1; Service class 2 approximates to Use class
1 or if there could be occasional wetting of the timber Use class 2; Service class 3 approximates to Use
class 2 or Service class 3 or higher if the timber if used externally.
30 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
6.1 General
The current harmonised European product standards for dowel-type fasteners and connectors are EN
14592: 2008 + A1: 2012 and EN 14545: 2008, respectively. Work on the amendment of EN 14592 has
just finished and the draft, prEN 14592 (June 2017), is at time of writing at the CEN Enquiry stage. It
is possible the amended standard, which has some significant changes, could be published in 2018. EN
14545 is also under revision. The European Technical Approval Guidelines ETAG 015 [6] cover three-
dimensional nailing plates, but there are currently no European standards for these connectors.
6.2.1 General
EN 14592 gives the requirements for dowel-type fasteners for use in timber-to-timber, panel-to-timber
and steel-to-timber connections. These requirements are for special stainless or carbon steel nails,
staples, screws, dowels and bolts with nuts. All dowel-type fasteners except dowels may be loaded either
laterally or axially; when loaded axially screws may be in tension or in compression. The longitudinal
axis of a dowel-type fastener is usually installed perpendicular to the grain, but screws installed at an
angle to the grain are also used, especially long fully threaded screws.
The development of new types of screws continues and includes:
The use of fasteners coated with three types of coatings are also within the scope of the standard. These
coatings are:
To calculate the axial withdrawal capacity of a fastener the designer needs the geometry of the
fastener and the characteristic withdrawal parameter for the fastener in timber; if the fastener is a screw
he may need the characteristic tensile strength of the screw. Note the withdrawal parameter is called
a strength in EN 1995-1-1 and a parameter in EN 14592: 2008 + A1: 2012. The use of parameter
is preferred because for a screw, for example, the value depends on the magnitude of the pointside
penetration length of the threaded part.
There is only one equation for calculating the characteristic head pull through strength, or parameter,
in EN 1995-1-1 and that is for smooth nails. The head pull-through parameters for other than smooth
nails, staples and screw heads are found from tests done by the manufacturer and the characteristic
values are determined from the test results using EN 14358.
Table E.1 summarizes the EN 1995-1-1 equations for calculating the characteristic yield moment for
nails, staples, screws, dowels and bolts. The characteristic tensile strength of steel dowels for different
steel types and of steel bolts for different steel classes are given in Table E.2. The equations for calculating
the characteristic withdrawal parameter are included in Table E.3.
Table E.4 summarizes the options open to manufacturers for determining values for smooth shank
and ring shank nails, staples, and partially threaded and fully threaded screws for the purpose of declaring
values in the DoP.
Expressions for the calculation of characteristic embedment strengths for a fastener in solid timber
are given for each fastener type in section 8 in EN 1995-1-1 and for nails in plywood, hardboard,
particleboard and oriented strand board. For other wood-based materials the embedment strength can be
determined from tests according to EN 383 and the characteristic value can be calculated from the test
results according to EN 14358.
At this point it is worth highlighting that the current EN 14592 is a harmonised product standard
which was published before the CPR came into effect (July 2013). The amended draft standard has been
changed to align with the CPR. Under the CPR, a manufacturer can choose which essential characteristics
he declares in the Declaration of Performance for a particular product. For the essential characteristics he
chooses to declare, Table ZA.1 in EN 14592 lists what must be declared for each chosen characteristic.
To further complicate matters, most screw manufacturers currently assess and verify the constancy
of performance of their screws using the European Assessment Document EAD 130118-00-0603
(published in October 2016) [7] and before that the Common Understanding on Assessment Procedures
CUAP 06.03/08 [8] was used. According to the scope of the EAD, the products (screws) are not fully
covered by EN 14592: 2008 + A1: 2012 (the current harmonised EN) and the additional essential
characteristics: bending angle (for ductility), yield strength, slip modulus for axially loaded screws,
spacing, end and edge distances of screws, and minimum thickness of wood based material, are covered
in the EAD.
For some values, the manufacturer has a choice on how he verifies a value. For example, the value
of the characteristic yield moment can be determined by:
(a) Carrying out tests according to EN 409 (modified as in 6.3.4.2 in EN 14592) and determining the
characteristic value from the test results using EN 14538, or
(b) Calculating the value from Equations (8.14) or (8.30) in EN 1995-1-1 using the tensile strength
determined by the manufacturer from test results.
Most modern wood screws are rolled or forged from steel wire or rod and heat treatment is part of
the manufacturing process. The heat treatment typically increases the tensile strength and the yield
32 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
moment. In the current EN 14592, if a manufacturer chooses to declare the characteristic yield moment
of a modern screw, he is not required to state how the value has been determined (i.e. from (a) or (b)
above) and for this reason the designer should always use the manufacturer’s declared value for the
characteristic yield moment. The manufacturer is required to declare the minimum characteristic yield
moment for the shank and the threaded parts, but may declare two values, i.e. one for each part.
The same applies to the declared characteristic withdrawal parameter, because once again the
manufacturer is not required to state how the declared value has been determined.
Because of the above, it is no longer valid to specify a steel screw in a detail or specification by just
giving its diameter, overall length and minimum threaded length.
A manufacturer is required to state the reference characteristic density when declaring either the
characteristic withdrawal parameter or the characteristic head pull-through parameter for a nail, staple
or screw. The most widely used reference characteristic density in Europe is 350 kg/m3 (for strength
class C24 according to EN 338). The characteristic withdrawal or head pull-through parameter of one
of these fasteners in timber of strength class C16 may be calculated by multiplying the values given for
the reference characteristic density by the factor
𝜌𝜌𝜌𝜌
( #,%&' 𝜌𝜌𝜌𝜌#,()* ),
where
ρk,C16 is the characteristic density for strength class C16 (equal to 310 kg/m3)
ρk,ref is the reference characteristic density in kg/m3
c is an exponent which equals 2 for nails and staples and equals 1,2 for screws
(the exponent has the same value for the withdrawal and head pull-through parameters)
For example:
The characteristic withdrawal parameter of a screw, fax,k = 10 N/mm2 is declared for timber with ρk,ref
= 350 kg/m3.
In the new prEN 14592, new W classes of characteristic withdrawal parameter and H classes of
characteristic head pull-through for ring shank nails, staples and screws are proposed for timber with a
characteristic density of 350 kg/m3. This would allow manufacturers to declare a class or actual values
or both and would allow a designer to specify a fastener by giving the length, diameter, a withdrawal
parameter W class and a head pull-through H class and to not have to specify a specific product.
requirements for zinc-coated carbon steel or stainless steels are given separately for (a) the part of the
fastener in the timber, and (b) the part which is in the atmosphere. For the part embedded in timber,
five new T classes are used to define a range of conditions which can coexist. Each T class represents a
combination of conditions taking account of:
For the part of the fastener in the atmosphere, new corrosivity classes (C classes) define six different
atmospheric conditions which are based on those in EN ISO 9223. The minimum thicknesses of zinc
coatings on carbon steel or the required grades of stainless steel are given for fasteners in the different
T and C classes in two new tables, Table 1 and Table 2. Tables B.1 and B.2 in Annex B give guidance
to the designer on how to identify the atmospheric environment for a particular case and in a third table,
Table B.3 wood species are assigned to T Classes T3 or T4 based on the natural acidity of the wood.
Stainless steels have been and continue to be classified using different standards; using a steel
number according to EN 10088-1 (e.g. 1.4401) or an A class to Table 1 in EN ISO 3506-1: 2009
(e.g. A2) are two ways a designer can specify the type of stainless steel required. In the new prEN
14592, stainless steels with steel numbers or A numbers are grouped into four new K classes, K2
to K5 in Table 3.
Under the new system, it is intended that the manufacturer would declare the corrosion resistance
by stating the fastener is suitable for use in both a timber and atmosphere defined by the new T and
C class system. For example, a fastener which is declared as suitable for T3/C3 would be suitable
for use in these two environments and also in lower T or C class environments. For stainless
steel fasteners, the manufacturer must also declare the type of stainless steel, using either the steel
number according to EN 10088-1, or the A number according to EN ISO 3506-1, or a K class.
In the new system, the manufacturer is declaring that the zinc coating on carbon steel or the
resistance of the stainless steel will last for a period of 50 years in the declared classes.
6.3 Connectors
6.3.1 General
EN 14545 is a harmonised European product standard which covers connectors manufactured from steel
and it gives the performance requirements for: the steel connectors specified in EN 912, pressed metal
plate fasteners and steel nailing plates. The standard gives the requirements for materials, geometry,
mechanical strength and stiffness, and corrosion resistance.
Equations for calculating the load-carrying capacity of pressed metal plate fasteners, split ring and
shear plate connectors and toothed plate connectors are given in section 8 in EN 1995-1-1.
The other seven connectors in EN 912 are not covered by EN 14545, but expressions are given
for calculating the characteristic load-carrying capacity of each in EN 1995-1-1. Of these the more
commonly used connectors are:
• Type A1 ring connectors and Type B1 plate connectors made of aluminium casting alloy EN AC-
AlSi9Cu3(Fe) according to EN 1706
• Types C10 and C11 toothed plate connectors made of malleable cast iron according to EN 1562.
The characteristic lateral load-carrying capacity of connections made with the EN 912 connectors
generally depend on all or some of the following:
• the geometry of the connector and its embedment in the pieces being joined
• the spacing of the connectors in the parallel and perpendicular to grain directions
• the number of connectors in a line parallel to the grain
• the loaded end distance
• the number of connectors per shear plane
• the characteristic density of the timber
• the angle of the force to the grain direction.
The minimum spacings and end distances for the different connectors are given in EN 1995-1-1 in
Tables 8.7, 8.8 and 8.9 and the geometry of the connectors in EN 912.
According to 8.10(1) the characteristic load-carrying capacity of a connection made using toothed
plated connectors is the sum of the load-carrying capacity of the connectors and the load-carrying
capacity of the connecting bolt.
For initial type testing, the current EN 14545: 2008 requires that the mechanical strength (characteristic
load-carrying capacity) of a shear plate, split ring or toothed plate connector shall be tested and assessed
using 6.1.3 which states the capacity shall be determined according to EN 13271. The latter is not a test
standard, however, and no physical tests are required to be carried out on connections made with these
connectors. The characteristic load-carrying capacity is determined by calculations alone based mainly
on the geometry of the connector. The only physical testing required for these connectors is the testing
of the steel material.
The characteristic load-carrying capacity for ring and shear plate connector joints and toothed plate
connector joints can be calculated using expressions in EN 13271 or expressions in EN 1995-1-1. The
calculated values are the same.
Expressions for calculating the slip modulus for the different connectors are also given in both EN
13271 (expressions (3), (8) and (9)) and in EN 1995-1-1 (Table 7.1). The expressions for values for the
slip modulus for the toothed plate connectors in Table 7.1 are incorrect. The value for the type C1 to C9
connectors should be changed to that given for the type C10 and C11 connectors and vice versa.
where
fa,0,0,k anchorage capacity per unit area for α = 0° and β = 0°
fa,90,90,k anchorage capacity per unit area for α = 90° and β = 90°
α angle between the x-direction and the force
β angle between the grain direction and the force
x-direction main direction of the plate
k1, k2 and α0 constants from anchorage tests.
The above values are provided using the procedures in Annex B of EN 14545. The values of fa,0,0,k, fa,30,0,k,
fa,60,0,k, fa,90,0,k, fa,0,90,k and fa,90,90,k are determined from tests according to EN 1075 and the characteristic
values are calculated using B.2.3 in EN 14545. The characteristic strengths and the constants required
in 8.8.4 in EN 1995-1-1 are then calculated from the test results using B.2.4.
Note: For some nail plate types and angles, the value of the characteristic plate anchorage strength fa,α,0,k
calculated using expression (8.44) in EN 1995-1-1 is higher than the characteristic strength derived from
tests to EN 1075, i.e. the calculated strength is too high and unsafe in some cases. EN 14545 is currently
under revision and the remedy to the above inconsistency will be included. The PMPF system owners
should have already changed their calculation software packages accordingly.
To calculate the characteristic plate capacities according to 8.8.5.2 in EN 1995-1-1, the designer
needs: ft,0,k, ft,90,k, fc,0,k, fc,90,k, fv,0,k, fv,90,k, γ0 and kv
where
ft,0,k, ft,90,k characteristic plate tension strengths at 0° and 90° to main direction of plate, derived
directly from tests
fc,0,k, fc,90,k characteristic plate compression strengths at 0° and 90° to main direction of plate,
derived directly from tests
fv,0,k, fv,90,k characteristic plate shear strengths at 0° and 90° to main direction of plate, derived
directly from tests
γ0, kv plate steel property constants.
Two tension capacity, two compression capacity and twelve shear capacity tests are carried out according
to EN 1075 at the angles listed in Table B.2 in EN 14545 and the characteristic values are calculated
according to B.2.3 (EN 14545). The characteristic capacities and the constants required in 8.8.5.2 in EN
1995-1-1 are then calculated from the test results using B.3.3.
The plate slip modulus kser is determined according to EN 26891 from the test results for the full set
of plate anchorage tests.
7.1 General
In most buildings, the horizontal elements which resist the horizontal components of wind loads are
supported by vertical cantilever plate elements, braced frames or moment-resisting frames. In light
timber frame construction where vertical cantilever plate elements or horizontal plate elements are used,
these in-plane loaded elements are typically constructed by mechanically fixing wood-based panels to
the floor joists in floors or to the timber frame members in walls. This section provides information
needed by the structural engineer to design these horizontal or vertical plate elements.
Roof and floor plate elements may also provide lateral (or horizontal) support to a beam to resist
lateral torsional buckling. This support may be provided at the top or bottom edge of the beam or at some
point in between the two.
Within these plate elements the floor joists in horizontal elements and wall studs in external vertical
elements are also required to resist out-of-plane floor and wind loads, respectively.
To use the above method the span must be between 2.b and 6.b where b is the width.
1. Shear walls are required to resist both the horizontal and vertical actions imposed on them
2. Shear walls must be restrained to prevent overturning and sliding
3. The racking resistance of light timber frame shear walls shall be determined by calculation using
appropriate design models and analysis, or by carrying out tests in accordance with I.S. EN 594
4. The horizontal deflections of shear walls shall be determined to ensure they are within appropriate
limits.
In short, a structural engineer must verify that a shear wall will be strong and stiff enough to support the
loads applied to it.
Horizontally and vertically in-plane loaded structural plate elements | 37
In the current Methods A and B in EN 1995-1-1, the horizontal load-carrying capacity of a timber frame
shear wall is directly proportional to the design load-carrying capacity of the panel-to-timber connection
for the fastener used. No horizontal deflection limits for vertical timber frame cantilevers are given in EN
1995-1-1, but a limit of h/300 on the instantaneous deflection is recommended in the Irish N.A. to EN
1995-1-1, where h is the height of the wall. Without this limit, a designer could use the deflection limit
for cantilevers, h/150, in Table NA.3. Prior to implementation of the Eurocodes, racking strengths of
walls calculated using BS 5268-6.1 [13] were based on a slightly lower maximum horizontal deflection
limit of 0,003 times the wall panel height (h/333).
The instantaneous horizontal deflection of a vertical wall plate element subjected to horizontal load
applied at the top is made up of four parts:
The deflection in 1 is typically greater than the sum of the other three parts and so when making a
decision on whether to use staples or nails for the panel-to-timber connections, the designer should
compare not only the lateral load-carrying capacities of the connections but also the slip. Expressions
for calculating the slip modulus, Kser , of nails and staples in wood-based panel-to-timber connections
are given in Table 7.1 in EN 1995-1-1.
7.1.4 Connections
In a light timber frame vertical plate element there are many different connections, but when considering
deflection the most significant of these connections are the:
Shear connections
Where a timber sole plate is used under the bottom rail it must be connected to the supporting wall,
concrete slab, or raft foundation to resist sliding; where the bottom rail is connected directly to the same
supporting construction, the same resistance to sliding must be provided.
Trusses fabricated with punched metal plate fasteners | 39
8.1 General
In the RoI the vast majority of trusses are prefabricated by specialist companies using punched metal
plate fasteners. Truss fabricators use software and plate fasteners provided by System Owners; the
term System Owner refers to the company that manufactures the punched metal plates and provides
design information on the plates usually incorporated into the design software. The design software is
almost exclusively used under licence by the truss fabricators who are trained by the System Owner
on its use. The System Owners also incorporate into their design systems long experience of truss
behaviour and testing; many of the features are common to all systems as often the cost of testing is
shared.
Some elements of section 10 (Structural detailing and control) relate to trusses and some of these are also
covered in EN 14250 “Timber structures - Product requirements for prefabricated structural members
assembled with punched metal plate fasteners”.
Section 5 refers to some general principles for analysis, while Section 5.4 is specifically related to
assemblies and frames both of which would include trusses. Section 5.4.3 covers simplified analysis
of trusses with punched metal plate fasteners. However, as the design of most trusses using this type
of fastener is undertaken by the System Owners, their designs have an element of the simplified design
procedure; but their overall design also includes information derived from experience and testing e.g.
the fixing together of the different plies of girder trusses is based on testing and not just design.
In designing the different timber components of a truss, sections 6 (ultimate limit state) and 7
(serviceability limit state) apply as they would to any rafter or ceiling tie or compression member
(web).
Section 8.8 (connections made with punched metal plate fasteners) gives guidance on plate design.
The plate anchorage strengths (8.8.4) can be calculated using the equations in this section or based on
tests, most System Owners use test information. Section 8.8.5 gives a method for calculating the plate
anchorage stresses and the plate capacity.
Note: For some nail plate types and angles, the value of the characteristic plate anchorage strength
fa,α,0,k calculated using expression (8.44) in EN 1995-1-1 is higher than the characteristic strength
derived from tests to EN 1075, i.e. the calculated strength is too high and unsafe in some cases. EN
14545 is currently under revision and the remedy to the above inconsistency will be included. The
PMPF system owners should have already changed their calculation software packages accordingly.
40 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Clause 9.2.1 covers trusses; for trusses loaded predominantly at the nodes the bending and compression
combined stress ratios are reduced from 1 to 0,9. For simplified analysis cases, this clause also gives
information on bay lengths and effective column lengths as well as requiring the calculated axial forces
to be increased by 10 % for compression and connection verifications. Another requirement for simplified
analysis is that for trusses loaded at the nodes the tensile and compression stress ratios as well as the
connection capacity should be limited to 70 %.
There is a requirement that all joints should be capable of transferring forces which might occur during
handling and erection. All joints should also be able to transfer a minimum load Fr,d acting in any direction;
this load (in kN) is given as 1 + 0,1 times the overall length of the truss (length in m). This applies to trusses
with punched metal plates.
Clause 9.2.2 specifically applies to trusses with punched metal plates. Such trusses are required
to comply with EN 14250 “Timber structures - Product requirements for prefabricated structural
members assembled with punched metal plate fasteners”. The clause also states that clauses 9.2.1 and
5.4.1 apply. Calculations should assume a linear relationship between force and slip and a minimum
overlap of the plate on any timber member should be at least the greater of 40 mm or one third the
height of the timber member.
Clause 9.2.5 covers bracing and 9.2.5.3 specifically covers beam or truss systems. It states that a bracing
system should be able to cater for a specified internal stability load and that the bracing should be able to
resist external horizontal loads (e.g. wind). The truss fabricator normally designs and specifies the bracing
which is required as part of his design, for example to cater for load reversal in long tension members
but not necessarily bracing according to 9.2.5.3 unless commissioned to do so. It is important to note the
difference between truss design and roof design. Most truss fabricators will certify the truss design but
often the overall roof design and its certification are overlooked.
Section 10.9 gives special rules for trusses with punched metal plates, these include:
• Trusses should be checked for straightness and vertical alignment prior to fixing the permanent
bracing
• If members that have distorted during the period between fabrication and erection can be straightened
without damage to the timber or the joints and maintained straight, then the truss may be considered
satisfactory for use
• The maximum bow abow in any truss member after erection should be limited. Provided that it is
adequately secured in the completed roof to prevent the bow from increasing, the permitted value
of the maximum bow should be taken as abow,perm. Note: In the Irish National Annex the abow,perm
limit is given as the lesser of 10 mm or 0,003 times the length of the chord or web member (in mm)
• The maximum deviation adev of a truss from true vertical alignment after erection should be limited.
The permitted value of the maximum deviation from true vertical alignment should be taken as
adev,perm.
Note: In the Irish national annex adev, perm is given as the lesser of 25 mm or 10+5(H-1) where
H is the height of the truss in metres.
Trusses fabricated with punched metal plate fasteners | 41
To take account of handling of trusses, S.R. 70 gives recommendations on limits for trusses spans and
sizes:
• The target thickness of trusses should be a minimum of span/345 and not less than 35 mm
• The maximum bay length should not exceed the appropriate value given in Table 2 of S.R. 70
• The overall length of any internal member between node points should not exceed the appropriate
value given in Table 3 of S.R. 70.
S.R. 70 also gives lists of information that should be required by the truss designer and the building
designer.
Handling and storage guidance is given in section 11 and follows standard good workmanship practices.
Section 12 refers to site work including a delivery inspection. Trusses should not be modified or
repaired unless authorised by the truss designer or building designer. Tolerances are given on truss erection
and further advice on the fixing of girder and principal trusses. Wall plates should have a minimum width
of 75 mm generally and 97 mm where the truss or wall plate is C18 or less; the truss designer should carry
out a design check on the wall plate for heavily loaded trusses and it is recommended that wall plates be
treated with preservative.
Advice is given on bracing (bracing not related to the structural design) and minimum bracing requirements
are specified by reference to Annex B (S.R.70). There are recommendations on cistern support which specify
a minimum strength class of C16 and require water tank loads to be spread over at least 4 trusses. The
minimum sizes specified implies that in some cases the water tank’s supports may need to be designed.
Annex A gives detailed information on bracing and minimum bracing details. Maximum spans of
trusses for the standard bracing are given in Table A.1 taking into account the roof angle, the basic wind
speed and eaves height.
Finally a number of standard construction details associated with roof trusses are given and a typical
roof truss construction checklist as well as advice on a typical erection procedure for the trusses.
8.3 EN 14250
8.3.1 Requirements
EN 14250 “Timber structures - Product requirements for prefabricated structural members assembled
with punched metal plate fasteners” is a harmonised product standard under the Construction Products
Regulation (EU) No. 305/2011 (CPR).
The standard includes the following:
Additional visual grading limits for timber distortion
Durability requirements related to use class (EN 335).
• Method 1: by reference to dated drawings of the structural member with information on the
geometrical data and reference to the material properties of the structural components and punched
Trusses fabricated with punched metal plate fasteners | 43
metal plate fasteners used, sufficient to calculate characteristic load-bearing capacities and stiffness.
This would typically refer to e.g. a product placed on retail shelves; the works where the member is
going to be used would normally not be known and the design would be carried out by an unknown
third party using the supplied information on the truss.
• Method 2: by calculating the characteristic values or design values for the load-bearing capacities
and stiffness of the structural member. By this method the characteristic mechanical resistance is
directly declared and would refer e.g. to catalogue products such as trussed beams. The works where
the member is going to be used would normally not be known.
• Method 3a: by declaring compliance with the given production documents, together with the
information on the structural design of the member. The fabricator makes the truss to requirements
specified by a third party and has no responsibility for the structural design.
• Method 3b: by declaring compliance with a given structural design specification showing that the
member is able to resist all the relevant actions affecting it in the ultimate limit state and satisfies
specified serviceability requirements in a specific part of works. This method usually is relevant for
a structural member made to measure and the works where the member will be used is known.
Method 3b is the normal method relevant to prefabricated roof trusses where the fabricator designs and
fabricates the trusses.
The minimum target thickness of timber should be 35 mm and the minimum depths should be 68
mm for external chords and 58 mm for webs and internal members.
There should be no protruding fasteners outside the timber edge and fasteners should be at least 3
mm from the lower edge in contact with a support.
Product drawings (section 6) are important and adequate drawings and written instructions should
be provided with the prefabricated members; these should relate to their transport, handling, storage,
erection, positioning and internal bracing, together with any fixing details necessary to construct
compound or multi-part structures.
The structural design information to be provided is specified for Method 2 and Method 3b in section
6.2.2. For Method 3b this includes:
1. The design codes that have been used to verify the design (EN 1995-1-1*)
44 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
* For Ireland this is I.S. EN 1995-1-1, and a reference to the relevant National Annexes.
For design engineers checking the design and certification of the roof trusses the design information is
particularly relevant as Declaration of Performances can be generic i.e. not site specific.
Information is given on the evaluation of conformity and Factory Production Control (FPC).
Additionally, the following should be given either on the member or in accompanying documentation:
4. The location of support areas and any points at which internal bracing is required according to the
design
5. If the member is not preservative treated, use class in accordance with EN 335-1 and EN 335-2
6. If the member is preservative treated, use class in accordance with EN 335-1 and EN 335-2, type of
preservative, critical retention value and penetration class in accordance with EN 15228.
8.3.2 CE Marking
The level of attestation (assessment and verification of the constancy of performance) for roof trusses is
2+, or 1 if there is a stage where the reaction to fire has been improved. A notified body must be involved
in the assessment and surveillance of the factory production control system. The notified body should
produce a Certificate of Conformity of the Factory Production Control and the manufacturer should
produce a Declaration of Conformity; as EN 14250 has not yet been revised to conform to the CPR, a
DoP is still required.
The essential characteristics listed under CE marking include the following:
Mechanical resistance
Declared by one of the four Methods above, for Method 3b load-bearing and deflection is declared based
on EN 1990, EN 1991 and EN 1995-1-1.
Dimensional stability
Calculated according to EN 1995-1-1, usually not declared in CE marking.
Reaction to fire
Tested and classified according to EN 13501-1 or CWFT to Class D-s2, d0.
Fire resistance
Classified according EN 13501-2 after testing to standards given in EN 13501-2 or calculated according
to EN 1995-1- and EN 1995-1-2. Fire resistance is dependent on the makeup of the construction.
Durability
If the timber is not treated then EN 350-2 can be referenced along with the durability class. If treated then
the details required by EN 15228 should be provided along with the durability class or more commonly
the use class.
Fasteners should be declared according to EN 14545.
Declaration of Performance
The declarations in the DoP should be the same as those in the CE mark. A CE mark cannot be affixed
until the manufacturer has drawn up a DoP.
The performance of at least one essential characteristic must be declared, NPD should be used where
no performance is determined. The DoP should list all the essential characteristics given in EN 14250.
In a number of the performances listed above the performance can also be expressed as a “Pass” or “Fail”.
The manufacturer is solely responsible for the CE mark and the DoP. It is up to the user or specifier
to check that the performances declared satisfy their particular requirements for the end use.
The full CE marking requirements to be marked on the truss along with the CE symbol are:
CE marking in the accompanying documentation includes all of the above and the declared performances
of the essential characteristics.
46 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Note: When a manufacturer uses components covered by a harmonised specification (e.g. punched metal
plates, structural timber, finger jointing) then they are taking responsibility for the CE mark and DoP of
those components.
Annex A – Tables –Solid timber and glued timber products | 47
These tables include strength and stiffness values and densities for solid timber, finger jointed solid timber,
glued laminated timber, glued solid timber, laminated veneer lumber and cross laminated timber. Maximum
deviations of sizes from nominal/target sizes for these products are also included in this annex.
Abbreviations:
E Modulus of elasticity
G Shear modulus
5 %-ile 5th percentile or 5-percentile
Table A.1 – EN 338: 2016 Strength classes system based on test results for three primary properties.
Strength Classes
C classes T classes D classes
Solid timber species Softwoods a) Softwoods a) Hardwoods a)
Based on tests to I.S. EN 408:
Characteristic bending
fm,k Edgewise ft,0,k fm,k Edgewise
or tension strength Tension tests
bending tests bending tests
Mean E ║ grain E0,mean Et,0,mean E0,mean
Characteristic density ρk Density tests ρk Density tests ρk Density tests
a) C and T classes may be used for some hardwoods, including poplar and chestnut.
Table A.2 – Calculation of strength and stiffness values and densities for C classes in EN 338: 2016 from
characteristic bending strength parallel to grain, mean E parallel to grain and characteristic density using
equations from EN 384: 2016 - Example calculations for C16 solid softwood timber.
Table A.3 – Strength and stiffness values and densities for some C strength classes from EN 338: 2016 for
solid softwood to EN 14081-1.
Table A.4 – Maximum deviations from target cross section dimensions for solid timber in Tolerance classes
1 and 2 to EN 336: 2013.
Table A.5 – Strength and stiffness values and densities for combined and homogeneous glulam according
to EN 14080: 2013.
Table A.6 – Maximum deviations from nominal dimensions for glulam, glulam with large finger joints and
block glued glulam according to EN 14080: 2013.
Table A.7 – Maximum deviations from nominal dimensions for glued solid timber according to EN 14080: 2013.
Table A.8 – Dimensions of glued laminated products at different moisture contents corrected to dimensions
at the reference moisture content, 12 %.
Reference MC % MC %
12 14 10 8
Corrected dimension in mm Actual dimension in mm
100 100,5 99,5 99,0
120 120,6 119,4 118,8
140 140,7 139,3 138,6
160 160,8 159,2 158,4
200 201,0 199,0 198,0
240 241,2 238,8 237,6
280 281,4 278,6 277,2
320 321,6 318,4 316,8
360 361,8 358,2 356,4
400 402,0 398,0 396,0
440 442,2 437,8 435,6
480 482,4 477,6 475,2
520 522,6 517,4 514,9
560 562,8 557,2 554,5
600 603,0 597,0 594,1
Table A.9 – Maximum deviations of corrected sizes from target sizes for laminated veneer lumber from 4.3
in EN 14374: 2005.
Table A.10 – Maximum deviations of corrected sizes from nominal dimensions for laminated veneer lumber
not treated by pressure treatment from Table 1 in prEN 14374 (May 2016).
Table A.11 – Swelling/shrinkage factors for LVL with and without cross layers from one manufacturer’s
product data.
Swelling/shrinkage factor
Dimension
LVL without cross layers LVL with cross layers
Cross-section dimensions:
Thickness (sum of ply
0,0024 0,0024
thicknesses), t
Width, b 0,0032 0,0003 a)
Member length:
Length, l 0,0001 0,0001
a)for b ≥ 500 mm
Table A.12 – Maximum deviations from nominal dimensions for CLT from 5.2.2.5 in EN 16351: 2015.
CLT layer:
Thickness, tl + 1 to – 1 mm
a) no maximum deviations given
52 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Table A.13 – A comparison of product dimensions and specifications for CLT made by two manufacturers.
Characteristic Dimension/specification
Product 1/manuf. 1 Product 2/manuf. 2
Cross laminated timber:
Thickness 54 to 350 mm 42 to 350 mm
Width ≤ 1,25 m ≤ 3,0 m
Length ≤5m ≤ 16,5 m
Length with large finger joint ≤ 24 m
3 ≤ n ≤ 20
Number of layers 3≤n≤9
Symmetric assembly
Maximum number of layers 2 for n = 4 or 5;
≤2
with same grain direction 3 for n > 5
Maximum width of gap between boards in a layer 4 mm 3 mm
Boards:
Material Softwood
Cross layers: One of combinations:
≥ 30 % C24; ≤ 70 % 100 % C16
Strength class:
C16 ≥ 90 % C24 / ≤ 10 %
Graded /assigned to
Longitudinal layers: C16
Strength class in EN 338
≥ 90 % C24; ≤ 10 % ≥ 90 % C30 / ≤ 10 %
C16 C24
Thickness 18 to 45 mm 14 to 45 mm
Width 80 to 250 mm 40 to 300 mm
Ratio of width to thickness of cross layer boards ≥4:1 ≥4:1
6 to 15 %
Moisture content of wood to EN 13183-2 12 ± 2 %
≤ 5 % between boards
Finger joints According to EN 14080 According to EN 14080
Annex B – Tables - Adhesives in glued timber products | 53
Table B.2 – Adhesive classes according to EN 301: 2013, EN 15425: 2017 and EN 16254: 2016.
Table B.3 – Moisture contents in pieces being glued together in finger jointed solid timber, glued laminated
timber, glued solid timber and cross laminated timber.
These tables include strength and stiffness values and densities for OSB, particleboards, hardboard,
medium board (high density) and MDF.
Sub-type
Use conditions Load bearing Load-duration
Product Class
Heavy Short/
dry humid all
duty Instant.
OSB/2 • •
Oriented strand
OSB/3 • • •
board:
OSB/4 • • •
P4 • •
P5 • •
Particleboards
P6 •
P7 • •
Fibreboards:
HB.LA1 • • •
Hardboard
HB.HLA2 • • •
Medium board MBH.LA2 • • •
MDF.LA • • •
MDF MDF.HLS • • •
MDF.RWH • •
Annex C – Tables – Wood-based panel products | 57
Table C.5 - Performance characteristics for wood-based panels for use as structural floor and roof decking
on joists and structural wall sheathing on studs.
Performance Particleboard
Plywood LVL OSB Fibreboard
characteristic (not extruded)
Bending strength EN 310/ EN 326-1
Bending stiffness
EN 310/ EN 326-1
(MoE)
EN 314-1 /
Bonding quality EN 14279 -
EN 314-2
Internal bond
- EN 319/EN 326-1
(tensile strength)
Durability:
Swelling in
- EN 317/EN 326-1
thickness
Moisture resistance 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.6.4
a) -
EN 13986 EN 13986 EN 13986
Release of
Annex B EN 13986
formaldehyde
Reaction to fire Table 8 EN 13986, or relevant tests from EN 13501-1
Strength and stiffness:
Bending, EN 789/
EN 789/EN 1058, or
Compression, EN 636, or -
EN 12369-1
tension & shear EN 12369-2
Impact resistance for structural use:
Floor decking on
EN 1195 & EN 12871
joists
Roof decking on
EN 12871
joists
Wall sheathing
EN 596 & EN 12871
on studs
Strength and stiffness under point load for structural use:
Floor decking on
EN 1195 & EN 12871
joists
Roof decking on
EN 12871
joists
Racking resistance Characteristic racking strength and mean stiffness from EN 594 test, or
wall sheathing on characteristic LL-C capacity b) from EN 1380/EN 26891 test & EN 14358 for
studs fastener type and panel thickness
Characteristic strength from EN 383 test for fastener type and diameter, or
Embedment
EN 1995-1-1 calculation from density ρk for plywood, and thickness t for OSB,
strength
particleboard and hardboard
Mechanical
from EN 1156 test, or use kmod and kdef from EN 1995-1-1
durability
Annex B Use classes where panel can be used
Biological durability
EN 636 from EN 335
a) for end uses under humid conditions only
b) LL-C capacity is lateral load-carrying capacity
Annex C – Tables – Wood-based panel products | 59
Table C.6 – Comparison of minimum bending strengths and MoE for 12 mm thick OSB/3, P5 particleboard,
MDF.HLS and MDF.RWH panels. (Note: values in first two columns are not values for structural calculations).
Table C.7 – Example of classification of single species plywood from bending strengths and moduli of
elasticity from tests to EN 310.
Table C.8 – Calculation values for the example F 20/10 E 40/20 plywood with mean density of 360 kg/mm3
from EN 12369-2.
Table C.9 – Calculation values for OSB panels made to EN 300 for OSB/2 for use in dry conditions and OSB/3
in humid conditions.
Table C.10 – Calculation values for OSB panels made to EN 300 for OSB/4 Heavy-duty load bearing panels
for use in humid conditions.
Table C.11 – Calculation values for particleboards made to EN 312 for use in dry conditions:
P4 Load bearing panels and P6 Heavy-duty load-bearing panels.
Particleboard type P4 P6
Nominal thickness in mm >6 - 13 >13 - 20 >20 - 25 >6 - 13 >13 - 20 >20 - 25
Characteristic strength values in N/mm2:
Load
┴ panel face:
Bending fm,k 14,2 12,5 10,8 16,5 15,0 13,3
Compression fc,90,k - -
Shear fv,k 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,9 1,7 1,7
Load ║ panel face:
Bending fm,k - - - - - -
Tension ft,k 8,9 7,9 6,9 10,5 9,5 8,5
Compression fc,k 12,0 11,1 9,6 14,1 13,3 12,8
Shear fv,k 6,6 6,1 5,5 7,8 7,3 6,8
Characteristic mean stiffness values in N/mm2:
Load
┴ panel face:
Modulus of elasticity Emean 3 200 2 900 2 700 4 400 4 100 3 500
Shear modulus Gmean - - - - - -
Load ║ panel face:
Modulus of elasticity Emean 1 800 1 700 1 600 2 500 2 400 2 100
Shear modulus Gmean 860 830 770 1 200 1 150 1 050
Characteristic densities in kg/m3:
Density ρk 650 600 550 650 600 550
Table C.12 – Calculation values for particleboards made to EN 312 for use in humid conditions:
P5 Load bearing panels and P7 Heavy-duty load-bearing panels.
Particleboard type P5 P7
Nominal thickness in mm >6 - 13 >13 - 20 >20 - 25 >6 - 13 >13 - 20 >20 - 25
Characteristic strength values in N/mm2:
Load
┴ panel face:
Bending fm,k 15,0 13,3 11,7 18,3 16,7 15,4
Compression fc,90,k - -
Shear fv,k 1,9 1,7 1,5 2,4 2,2 2,0
Load ║ panel face:
Bending fm,k - - - - - -
Tension ft,k 9,4 8,5 7,4 11,5 10,6 9,8
Compression fc,k 12,7 11,8 10,3 15,5 14,7 13,7
Shear fv,k 7,0 6,5 5,9 8,6 8,1 7,9
Characteristic mean stiffness values in N/mm2:
Load
┴ panel face:
Modulus of elasticity Emean 3 500 3 300 3 000 4 600 4 200 4 000
Shear modulus Gmean - - - - - -
Load ║ panel face:
Modulus of elasticity Emean 2 000 1 900 1 800 2 600 2 500 2 400
Shear modulus Gmean 960 930 860 1 250 1 200 1 150
Characteristic densities in kg/m3:
Density ρk 650 600 550 650 600 550
62 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Table C.13 – Calculation values for fibreboards made to EN 622 for classes:
HB.HLA2 Heavy-duty load-bearing hardboard for use in humid conditions OR
MBH.LA2 Heavy-duty load-bearing high density medium board for use in dry conditions.
Table C.14 – Calculation values for medium density fibreboards made to EN 622 for classes MDF.LA -
Load-bearing MDF for use in dry conditions MDF.HLS - MDF for use for loads of short-term duration or
less in humid conditions.
Table D.1 – Recommended partial factors γM for material properties and resistances.
Material γM
Fundamental combinations:
Solid timber 1,3
Glued laminated timber, CLT a) 1,25
LVL, plywood, OSB 1,2
Particleboards 1,3
Fibreboards:
Hardboards, Medium boards, Softboards, MDF 1,3
Connections:
All connections except as below 1,3
Axial steel strength in screws and bolts where axial load only is
1,15
resisted b)
PMP fasteners - timber strength 1,3
PMP fasteners - steel strength b) 1,15
Accidental combinations:
All 1,0
a) The 1,25 value for CLT is from PT draft
b) Values from Irish NA to EN 1995-1-1
Table D.4 – Modification factor kmod for service and load-duration classes - Solid timber, glulam, LVL,
plywood and CLT.
Table D.5 – Modification factor kmod for service and load-dration classes – OSB, particleboard and fibreboard.
Table D.6 – Deformation modification factor kdef for service classes – solid wood, glulam, LVL, plywood
and CLT.
Table D.7 – Deformation modification factor kdef for service classes – OSB, particleboard and fibreboard
OSB/2 a)
OSB/3 MBH.LA1 a) or 2 a)
HB.LA1 a) or 2 a)
Panel material OSB/4 MBH.HLS1 or 2
MDF.LA a), MDF.HLS
P6 a), P7
P4 a), P5
Service class
1 1,50 2,25 3,00
2 2,25 3,00 4,00
a) only Service class 1
Annex E – Tables - Fasteners and connectors | 67
Table E.1 – Equations in EN 1995-1-1 for characteristic yield moment for nails, staples, screws, dowels and
bolts.
Table E.3 – Equations in EN 1995-1-1 for characteristic withdrawal parameter for smooth nails, staples, and
screws.
Staple - -
penetration length of
Screw a) outer thread diameter
threaded part
ρk = characteristic timber density on the pointside in kg/m3
a) Where 6 mm ≤ d ≤ 12 mm and 0,6 ≤ d1/d ≤ 0,75
68 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Table E.4 – Determination of tensile strength, characteristic strength or yield moment for nails, staples or
screws - uncoated or coating type 1 – from tests or EN 1995-1-1 equations.
Nail Screw
Characteristic Symbol Ring Staple Partially Fully
Smooth
shank threaded threaded
Tensile strength:
fu EN ISO 6892-1
wire or rod
Char. yield moment:
EN 409 mod. EN 409 a)
from tests
My,Rk
Char. yield moment: Eqn. Eqn. Eqn.
-
from equations (8.14) (8.29) (8.14) or (8.30)
Char. tensile capacity:
Ftens,k mod. EN 1383 b)
from tests
Char. tensile strength: min. 600 from min. 800
fu,k from Ftens,k
tests or min. value N/mm2 Ftens,k N/mm2
Char. withdrawal
EN 1382
parameter: tests
fax,k
Char. withdrawal Eqn. Eqn. Eqn.
-
parameter: equations (8.25) (8.25) (8.39) or (8.40a)
Char. head pull-thro mod.
EN 1383
parameter: tests EN 1383 b)
fhead,k
Char. head pull-thro Eqn. Eqn.
- - -
parameter: equations (8.26) (8.40b)
a) Test in EN 409, but modified according to EN 14592.
b) Test in EN 1383, but modified according to EN 14592.
Table E.5 – Calculation of characteristic embedment strengths for nails in wood-based panel-to-timber
connections.
Table F.1 – Timber species for finger jointed solid timber, glued laminated timber, glued solid timber and
cross laminated timber.
Species code to
Common name Botanical name
EN 13556
Norway spruce Picea abies PCAB
Fir Abies alba ABAL
Scots pine Pinus sylvestris PNSY
Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii PSMN
Western Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla TSHT
Corsican pine Pinus nigra Arnold subsp. laricio PNNL
Austrian pine Pinus nigra Arnold subsp. nigra PNNN
European larch Larix decidua LADC
Siberian larch Larix sibirica LASI
Dahurian larch Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen
Maritime pine Pinus pinaster PNPN
Radiata pine Pinus radiata PNRD
Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis PCST
Southern yellow pine Pinus palustris PNPL
Western red cedar Thuja plicata THPL
Yellow cedar Chamaecyparis nootkatensis CHNT
Poplar Populus x euramericana cv POAL
“Robusta”, “Dorskamp”, “1214” and “14451”
70 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
Table G.1 – Some of the load combination values, ψ0, ψ1 and ψ2 from EN 1990 + Irish NA.
Combination value
Action
Ψ0 Ψ1 Ψ2
Imposed floor load:
Category A1, A2 Domestic & residential areas
0,7 0,5 0,3
Category B Office areas
Category C Congregation areas
0,7 0,7 0,6
Category D Shopping areas
Imposed roof load:
Category H Roof areas (other than balconies) 0,6 0,0 0,0
Climatic load:
Wind load To I.S. EN 1991-1-4 + NA 0,6 0,2 0,0
Altitude ≤1000 m above sea level; to
Snow load 0,5 0,2 0,0
I.S. EN 1991-1-3 + NA
Annex H – Non-contradictory complementary information | 71
Summaries of the contents of the Irish Standard Recommendation S.R. 71 and Irish standard I.S. 440
are given below; a similar summary of S.R. 70 (Trusses made with PMPF) is included in the Section on
trusses made with PMPF.
H.1.1 General
The title of the Irish Standard Recommendation S.R. 71: 2015 is “Timber in construction – Eurocode
5 - Span tables and guidelines”.
Subject to the stated conditions, this Standard Recommendation allows designers and specifiers to
specify the member size, spacings and strength class of solid softwood structural timber members found
in common use in domestic scale construction in the Republic of Ireland. It also allows a designer to
select and specify 44 mm thick by 100 mm wide solid softwood timber wall studs in a timber frame wall
which supports either category A1 domestic or category B office imposed floor loading.
In Tables 58 and 59, maximum allowable unfactored loads on a 44/100 mm wall stud are given for:
• Solid softwood timber in C classes C14, C16, C18, C24 and C27 (to EN 338)
• Stud heights 2,4 m, 2,7 m and 3,0 m
• Studs supporting floor areas designed for category A1 domestic or category B office imposed loads
• Four different stud arrangements: a single interior stud, a single end stud, an interior pair and an end
pair of studs.
The maximum spans for joists, rafters and purlins and the maximum service loads on the wall studs are
for members installed in a service class 2 environment as defined in EN 1995-1-1.
72 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
In EN 1991-1-4 the peak velocity pressure is the design pressure used to calculate the wind load on
a structural member and it is calculated according to that standard and its Irish National Annex. Peak
velocity pressures for a range of conditions are given in Table B.1 in S.R. 71. The symbol for peak
velocity pressure at a height z in metres is qp(z). In Table 1 the values under qp(10) and qp(13) are for
SLC 1 and SLC 2, respectively.
When calculating the peak velocity pressures for Table B.1 and the maximum span tables, it has been
assumed:
In one of the fundamental load combinations in the ultimate limit state according to EN 1990 the design
load Fd is:
where
Gk is the characteristic permanent load (self-weight)
Qw,k is the characteristic wind load (from positive or negative wind pressure)
0,9 is the load factor γf for permanent load
1,5 is the load factor for the primary variable load (in this case, wind load).
Annex H – Non-contradictory complementary information | 73
When a roof member in light roof construction is subjected to high negative wind pressure the above
load combination can determine the maximum span. It is also likely to be the design load that determines
the load carrying capacity of the connections. This is the reason why tables are provided for light and
heavy roofs and for flat roofs with a self-weight ranging from 0,3 to 0,6 kN/m2.
Because of the assumptions made in the calculations for the tables for flat roof joists, rafters and
purlins, a more economical design will usually be achieved by carrying out a bespoke design. Similarly,
if a structural roof member is specified as having a smaller cross-section, wider spacing, or lower strength
class than results from use of a S.R. 71 table, it may still comply with the requirements of EN 1995-1-1.
H.1.3 Connections
The design, detailing or specification of the connections are not included in the scope of S.R. 71 and this
fact is highlighted in the scope. Structural Recommendation S.R 71 replaced I.S. 444 which included
maximum span tables which were prepared to comply with the former permissible stress design standard
BS 5628.
In the fundamental load combination referred to above (light roof subjected to high negative
pressure), the design resistance of a connection between a rafter and a wall plate can be significantly
higher than before. Under the former permissible stress design in cases where the self-weight of the
roof just exceeded the maximum negative wind pressure, there is no net uplift, but, under the current
limit state design, the net uplift in those cases is 60 % of the negative wind pressure – a very significant
difference.
It is clear from the above that connections should be designed and specified by a structural engineer.
In addition, the wide range of fixings (most dependent on the information in their DoPs for design
information) highlights the need to involve a structural engineer in the design of connections.
Table H.2 – Definition and application of floor joist vibration limits, VL 1, VL 2 and VL 3.
Vibration limits VL 1 VL 2 VL 3
Use activities for Expression f1 < 8 Hz w/F ≤ a v ≤ bf1.ζ-1
floors (category)
EN 1995-1-1 Expression Expression
7.3.3(1)
reference (7.3) (7.4)
Domestic activities (A1) • n/a n/a
Enhanced domestic activities (A1) a) • • •
Residential activities (A2) • • •
Office areas (B) • • •
a)enhanced applies to separating floors between apartments
74 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
For the calculation of the equivalent plate bending stiffness of a floor about the x-axis it has been
assumed for vibration limits VL 2 and VL 3 that:
Note: The assessment criteria and the limits for vibrations in timber floors are currently under review by
WG 3 a working group under CEN TC 250/SC 5. It appears likely that new methods of assessment and
limits will be introduced in the second-generation Eurocode 5.
I.S. 440 is an Irish standard for light timber frame construction for dwellings and other buildings. The
requirements are limited to buildings where:
• The maximum number of storeys is four and the maximum height from the external ground surface
level to the top floor level is 10 m
• Timber materials are in service class SC 1 or SC 2 environments
• The maximum fire resistance required for members or elements is 60 minutes
• There is an outer leaf of masonry, timber or other cladding behind which a drained and ventilated air
space (cavity) is installed
• The maximum spacing of the timber wall studs is 610 mm
• The panels used in prefabricated wall, floor and roof elements are connected to the timber frame
with fasteners.
The standard requires that the design of the structural members or elements and their connections
complies with EN 1995-1-1 and EN 1995-1-2 and that the design is carried out by appropriately qualified
and experienced engineers according to 1.3 (2) of EN 1990.
Section 6 deals with structural design; 6.2 sets out what structural calculations should normally be
carried out and what should be demonstrated or verified; and Table 1 in 6.3 summarizes what design
checks should be carried out for structural timber members in roofs, floors and walls.
In 6.6.2 a list is given of the connections for which fasteners should be included in the required site
fixing schedule for each project.
I.S. EN 300: 2006, Oriented Strand Board (OSB) – Definition, Classification and Specifications
I.S. EN 384: 2016, Structural timber - Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties
and density
I.S. EN 844-3: 1995, Round and sawn timber - Terminology - Part 3: General terms relating to sawn timber
I.S. EN 844-9: 1997, Round and sawn timber - Terminology - Part 9: Terms relating to features of sawn timber
I.S. EN 1313-1: 2010, Round and sawn timber - Permitted deviations and preferred sizes - Part 1:
Softwood sawn timber
I.S. EN 1912: 2012, Structural Timber - Strength classes - Assignment of visual grades and species
I.S. EN 1912:2012/AC: 2013
I.S. EN 13183-1, 2002, Moisture content of a piece of sawn timber – Part 1: Determination by oven dry method
I.S. EN 13183-1, 2002/AC: 2003
I.S. EN 14080: 2013, Timber structures - Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber – Requirements
I.S. EN 14081-1: 2012, Timber structures - Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section
- Part 1: General requirements
I.S. EN 14081-2: 2010 + A1: 2012, Timber structures - Strength graded structural timber with rectangular
cross section - Part 2: Machine grading; additional requirements for initial type testing
I.S. EN 14081-3: 2012, Timber structures - Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section
- Part 3: Machine grading; additional requirements for factory production control
I.S. EN 14081-3:2012/prA1 (under approval)
I.S. EN 14358: 2016, Timber structures - Calculation and verification of characteristic values
I.S. EN 14374: 2004+A1:2009, Timber structures - Structural laminated veneer lumber - Requirements
prEN 14374 (Under Approval)
Will supersede EN 14279:2004+A1:2009 and EN 14374: 2004
76 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
I.S. EN 15497: 2014, Structural finger jointed solid timber - Performance requirements and minimum
production requirements
I.S. EN 310: 1993, Wood-based panels - Determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and of
bending strength
I.S. EN 316: 2009, Wood fibre boards - Definition, classification and symbols
I.S. EN 318: 2002, Wood-based panels – Determination of dimensional changes associated with relative
humidity
I.S. EN 326-1: 1994, Wood-based panels - Sampling, cutting and inspection - Part 1: Sampling and
cutting of test pieces and expression of test results
I.S. EN 326-2: 2010+A1: 2014, Wood-based panels – Sampling, cutting and inspection – Part 2: Initial
type testing and factory production control
I.S. EN 594: 2011, Timber structures - Test methods - Racking strength and stiffness of timber frame wall
panels
I.S. EN 596: 1995, Timber structures - Test methods - Soft body impact test of timber framed walls
I.S. EN 622-3: 2004, Fibreboards - Specifications - Part 3: Requirements for medium boards
I.S. EN 622-5: 2009, Fibreboards - Specifications - Part 5: Requirements for dry process boards (MDF)
I.S. EN 717-1: 2004, Wood-based panels - Determination of formaldehyde release - Part 1: Formaldehyde
emission by the chamber method
I.S. EN 789: 2004, Timber structures - Test methods - Determination of mechanical properties of wood
based panels
I.S. EN 1058: 2009, Wood-based panels - Determination of characteristic 5-percentile values and
characteristic mean values
I.S. EN 1156: 2013, Wood-based panels - Determination of duration of load and creep factors
I.S. EN 1195: 1997, Timber structures - Test methods - Performance of structural floor decking
I.S. EN 12369-1: 2001, Wood-based panels - Characteristic values for structural design - Part 1: OSB,
particleboards and fibreboards
I.S. EN 12369-2: 2011, Wood-based panels - Characteristic values for structural design - Part 2: Plywood
I.S. EN 12369-3: 2008, Wood-based panels - Characteristic values for structural design - Part 3: Solid-
wood panels
I.S. EN 12871: 2013, Wood-based panels - Determination of performance characteristics for load bearing
panels for use in floors, roofs and walls
I.S. EN 13353: 2008 + A1: 2011, Solid wood panels (SWP) – Requirements
I.S. EN 13354: 2008, Solid wood panels (SWP) - Bonding quality - Test method
I.S EN 320: 2011, Particleboards and fibreboards - Determination of resistance to axial withdrawal of
screws
I.S. EN 383: 2007, Timber Structures - Test methods - Determination of embedment strength and
foundation values for dowel type fasteners
I.S. EN 409: 2009, Timber structures - Test methods - Determination of the yield moment of dowel type
fasteners
I.S. EN 912: 2011, Timber fasteners - Specifications for connectors for timbers
I.S. EN 1075: 2014, Timber structures - Test methods - Joints made with punched metal plate fasteners
I.S. EN 1380: 2009, Timber structures - Test methods - Load bearing nails, screws, dowels and bolts
I.S. EN 1381: 2016, Timber structures - Test methods - Load bearing stapled joints
I.S. EN 1382: 2016, Timber Structures - Test methods - Withdrawal capacity of timber fasteners
I.S. EN 1383: 2016, Timber structures - Test methods - Pull through resistance of timber fasteners
I.S. EN 13271: 2001, Timber fasteners - Characteristic load-carrying capacities and slip-moduli for
connector joints
I.S. EN 13271:2001/AC:2003
I.S. EN 14250: 2010, Timber structures - Product requirements for prefabricated structural members
assembled with punched metal plate fasteners
I.S. EN 14358: 2016, Timber structures - Calculation and verification of characteristic values
I.S. EN 15736:2009, Timber Structures - Test methods - Withdrawal capacity of punched metal plate
fasteners in handling and erection of prefabricated trusses
I.S. EN 15737: 2009, Timber Structures - Test methods - Torsional resistance of driving in screws
Annex I – European standards – in categories | 79
I.4 – Adhesives
I.S. EN 301: 2013, Adhesives, phenolic and aminoplastic, load-bearing timber structures – Classification
and performance requirements
I.S. EN 302-1: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 1: Determination
of longitudinal tensile shear strength
I.S. EN 302-2: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 2: Determination
of resistance to delamination
I.S. EN 302-3: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 3: Determination of
the effect of acid damage to wood fibres by temperature and humidity cycling on the transverse tensile strength
I.S. EN 302-4: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 4: Determination
of the effects of wood shrinkage on the shear strength
I.S. EN 302-5: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 5: Determination
of maximum assembly time under referenced conditions
I.S. EN 302-6: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 6: Determination
of the minimum pressing time under referenced conditions
I.S. EN 302-7: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 7: Determination
of the working life under referenced conditions
I.S. EN 302-8: 2013, Adhesives for load-bearing timber structures - Test methods - Part 8: Static load
test of multiple bond line specimens in compression shear
I.S. EN 15416-1: 2017, Adhesives for load bearing timber structures other than phenolic and aminoplastic
- Test methods - Part 1: Long-term tension load test perpendicular to the bond line at varying climate
conditions with specimens perpendicular to the glue line (Glass house test)
I.S. EN 15416-3: 2017, Adhesives for load bearing timber structures other than phenolic and aminoplastic
- Test methods - Part 3: Creep deformation test at cyclic climate conditions with specimens loaded in
bending shear
I.S. EN 15416-4: 2017, Adhesives for load bearing timber structures other than phenolic and aminoplastic
- Test methods - Part 4: Determination of open assembly time under referenced conditions
I.S. EN 15416-5: 2017, Adhesives for load bearing timber structures other than phenolic and aminoplastic
- Test methods - Part 5: Determination of minimum pressing time under referenced conditions
I.S. EN 15425: 2017, Adhesives - One component polyurethane (PUR) for load-bearing timber structures
- Classification and performance requirements
80 | The Structural Use of Timber – Handbook for Eurocode 5: Part 1-1
I.S. EN 16254: 2013 + A1: 2016, Adhesives - Emulsion polymerized isocyanate (EPI) for load-bearing
timber structures - Classification and performance requirements
I.S. EN 335: 2012, Durability of wood and wood-based products - Use classes: definitions, application
to solid wood and wood-based products
I.S. EN 15228: 2009, Structural timber - Structural timber preservative treated against biological attack
CEN/TS 1099: 2007, Plywood - Biological durability - Guidance for the assessment of plywood for use
in different use classes
prEN 14732: 2012, Timber Structures – Prefabricated wall, floor and roof elements –
Requirements
Not published – there is no new Work Item. Work on this draft standard has stopped; at the time of
writing there are preliminary discussions on restarting the work.
I.7 - Miscellaneous
I.S. EN 1990: 2002, Eurocode 1990 - Basis of structural design - April 2010 - corrigendum
I.S. EN 1995-1-2, Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures – Part 1-2: General – Structural fire design
Annex J – References | 81
Annex J – References
[1] Madsen, B., Janzen, W., Zwaagstra, J., Moisture Effects in Lumber, Structural Research Series
Report #27 I.S.S.N. 0318-3378, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, 1980.
[2] European Assessment Document EAD 130005-00-0304, Solid wood slab element to be used as a
structural element in buildings, EOTA, (OJEU) 2015/C 226/05.
[3] Wallner-Novak, M., Koppelhuber, J., Pock, K., Cross Laminated Timber Structural Design - Basic
design and engineering principles according to Eurocode, pro:Holz, Austria, 2014.
[4] Manual; Industrial Wood Preservation - Specification and Practice, 2nd. Edition, Wood Protection
Association, Castleford, West Yorkshire, UK, 2012.
[5] BS 8417: 2011, Preservation of wood. Code of practice, British Standards Institution, London,
2011.
[6] ETAG 015, Guideline for European Technical Approval of Three-dimensional nailing plates,
European Organisation for Technical Approvals, Brussels, 2012.
[7] European Assessment Document EAD 130118-00-0603, Screws for use in timber constructions,
EOTA, (OJEU) 2016.
[8] Common Understanding of Assessment Procedure, CUAP 06.03/08, Screws for use in timber
constructions.
[9] NA: 2013 to I.S. EN 1995-1-1: 2005, Irish National Annex to Eurocode 5: Design of timber
structures – Part 1-1: General – Common rules and rules for buildings, NSAI, Dublin, 2013.
[12] Blass, H. J., Ehlbeck, J., Kreuzinger, H., Steck, G., Erlauterungen zu DIN 1052: 2004-08 – Entwurf,
Berechnung und Bemessung von Holzbauwerken (Commentary to DIN 1052: 2004-08 – Design,
Calculation and Sizing of Timber Structures), Informationdienst Holz, Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Holzforschung, Munich, 2004.
[13] BS 5268-6.1: 1996, Structural use of timber – Part 6: Code of practice for timber frame walls –
Section 6.1: Dwellings not exceeding seven storeys, British Standards Institution, London, 1996.
COFORD
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Agriculture House
Kildare Street
Dublin 2
Ireland
www.coford.ie