0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Sulu College of Technology, Inc.: Engineering Department

This document contains a report of grades for the Art Appreciation course taken during the 1st semester of the 2020-2021 school year at Sulu College of Technology. It lists 31 students, their midterm and final grades, final grade average, and remarks on whether they passed or failed. The grading scale ranges from 1.0 for excellent to 5.0 for failed. The original report is to be sent to the school registrar with copies to the engineering department chairperson and college department chairman.

Uploaded by

AMIR LADJA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Sulu College of Technology, Inc.: Engineering Department

This document contains a report of grades for the Art Appreciation course taken during the 1st semester of the 2020-2021 school year at Sulu College of Technology. It lists 31 students, their midterm and final grades, final grade average, and remarks on whether they passed or failed. The grading scale ranges from 1.0 for excellent to 5.0 for failed. The original report is to be sent to the school registrar with copies to the engineering department chairperson and college department chairman.

Uploaded by

AMIR LADJA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sulu College of Technology, Inc.

Tanjung, Kajatian, Indanan Sulu


E-mail: [email protected]
Engineering Department

REPORT OF RATINGS

SCHOOL YEAR:2020-2021
REPORT OF GRADES

Grades must be written in ink, Condition and Failure in red. This report is to be prepared in quadruplicate;
the original is to be sent to the Registrar of the school and one copy each to the Chairperson, Chairman of the
College Department.

Course No: ___ArtApp____ Unit: ___3__ Semester: ___1ST _ Time/Day: ____

Description: ___ART APPRECIATION __ Year: ____2020-2021____ Course: _DMET _

NAME Mid- Final Final Remarks


Type or print in blank letters. term Term Grades
Family Given
M.I.
1. ABDULGANI, ALSAIDER
2. ADALA, BIN-KHALID 90 95 1.25 PASSED
3. AKMAD, CARSUM 89 94 1.5 PASSED
4. ALLAMA, PALSON
5. HAMSI, ALMAL
6. ISMAEL, SHERHATA 88 94 1.5 PASSED
7. JANARIN, ANA 87 95 1.5 PASSED
8. JAUHALI, ARLYN 87 96 1.5 PASSED
9. KANAIN, MOH.
ALKHAIDAR
10. NADAR, SARNA 88 95 1.5 PASSED
11. OMPIL, ALKHABIR 90 95 1.25
12. SABRI, ANARIZA 92 96 1.25 PASSED
13. SAHIBAD, FARHANA 87 94 1.5
14. SAID, NURMINA
15. SAKATTI, SHERADA 89 96 1.25 PASSED
16. SAKILAN, ARMILYN 87 95 1.5 PASSED
17. SALIDDIN, NEDZMAR 88 94 1.5 PASSED
18. SAYYADI, SHAIRA 87 96 1.5 PASSED
19. SIRAJI, ANDRADA
20. SONNY, MAYMONA 85 96 1.5 PASSED
21. TOLENTINO, MARK
ANTHONY
22. ABDURAJI, SAUBI 89 95 1.25 PASSED
23. KANAIN, MOH. AL-
IBRAHIM
24. SARAHAN, MUAMMAR 88 96 1.25 PASSED
25. SALIALAM, HAIDER 87 94 1.5 PASSED
26. SATTARI, NURSAM 89 95 1.25 PASSED
27. LIM, SHERADZ 88 97 1.25 PASSED
28. ASGALI, SURAIDA 90 96 1.25 PASSED
29. HAJI, MOH. SHIEMAR
30. JAIYARI, JULMIN 87 96 1.5 PASSED
31. SARAIL, FRIDZMAR 86 95 1.5 PASSED

____________________
Please use the following numerical value:
Signature/Midterm
1.0 – (95-100) Excellent

1.25 – (92-94)
____________________ ____________________
1.5 – (90-91) Very Good
Signature/Pre-Final Signature/Final
1.75 – (87-89)

2.0 – (84-86) Good

2.25 – (81-83)

2.5 – (79-80) Satisfactory


ENGR. AL- RAJHEED JAWATAN___ _____________________
2.75 – (76-78)
ENGINEERING, Chairperson Date Received
3.0 – (75) Passing

5.0 – (Below 75) Failed

Submitted by:

FATIMA ZYCCHA R. KADIL

Instructor

TAMTAILER P. NANDU LEIDY FAITH B. LAGMAY

Chairman, College Department School Registrar

You might also like