Active Materials and Intelligent Structures
Active Materials and Intelligent Structures
PAOLO GAUDENZI
UNIVERSITA DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA
PART 1
INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES: AN INTRODUCTION
1. FOREWORD
2. TRADITIONAL AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES
3 ACTIVE MATERIALS
3.
4. ACTUATION MECHANISMS
5. SENSING MECHANISMS
6. CONTROL, MANUFACTURING ASPECTS
7. APPLICATION IN SPACE
8 APPLICATIONS
8. A CA O S IN OTHER
O ENGINEERING
G G FIELDS
S
9. COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS
10 ONGOING RESEARCH
10.
11. REFERENCES
P.GAUDENZI − ACTIVE MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES − PART 1
1. FOREWORD
ACTUATION STRAIN
ACTUATION STRAIN IS ALL THE STRAIN WHICH IS NOT DUE TO
MECHANICAL STRESS du
å: TOTAL STRAIN (IN 1D å=
σ )σ dx
å= +Ë
E E
: MECHANICAL STRAIN
APPLIED
POLING DIRECTION
FIELD
Ez y
DEFORMED SHAPE
x
−
PIEZOELECTRIC CAUSES DEFORMATION WHEN VOLTAGE IS APPLIED
PIEZOELECTRIC STRAIN ENTERS EQUATIONS IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO
THERMAL STRAIN
HIGH BANDWIDTH,
BANDWIDTH WELL INTO STRUCTURAL ACOUSTIC RANGE
TYPICAL MATERIALS FOR STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS:
− PIEZOCERAMIC PZT LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE Pb(Zr,Ti)O
( , ) 3
− POLYMER PVDF POLI VINILE FLUORIDE
P.GAUDENZI − ACTIVE MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES − PART 1
4. ACTUATION MECHANISMS (3)
− PIEZOELECTRICITY SUBSTRATE
− MAGNETOSTRICTION
− SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS V ACTUATOR CONTRACTS
ta
GOVERNING EQUATIONS l
εx(z)= ε0+kz KINEMATICS
σxs=cs11 εx STRUCT
STRUCT. CONSTITUTIVE RELATION
σxa= ca11(εx-Λ) ACTUAT.
INDUCED DEFORMATION
s
2 C11 t
MEMBRANE MODE ε0 = Λ Ψ= a s
2+Ψ C11 t a
1
σ(1 + )
T 2 ts
BENDING MODE k= Λ T=
12 8 t S ta
σ +Ψ+ + 2
T T
P.GAUDENZI − ACTIVE MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES − PART 1
4. ACTUATION MECHANISMS (5)
EULER BERNOULLI BEAM MODEL
1
kt s
0.8
2Λ
PIN FORCE
0.6
NORMALIZED
EULER
CURVATURE 0.4
BERNOULLI
0.2
ts
SS RATIO T T =
0
20 THICKN
THICKNESS
0 5 10 15
ta
THERE IS AN OPTIMUM VALUE FOR T THAT MAXIMIZES THE INDUCED
CURVATURE. BELOW THIS VALUE, AS T 0 THE THICKNESS OF THE
ACTUATOR IS LARGER AND LARGER WITH RESPECT TO THE THICKNESS OF
THE STRUCTURE, THE ACTUATION BENDING MOMENT INCREASES LESS
RAPIDLY THAN THE OVERALL BENDING STIFFNESS OF THE STRUCTURE
(SUBSTRATE+ACTUATORS).
THIS EFFECT IS NOT CAPTURED BY THE PIN−FORCE MODEL SINCE IT DOES
NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE CONTRIBUTION OF ACTUATORS TO THE GLOBAL
BENDING STIFFNESS.
P.GAUDENZI − ACTIVE MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES − PART 1
4. ACTUATION MECHANISMS (6)
PROTECTIVE COVER
INDUCED STRAIN ACTUATOR
ELASTIC LOAD BEARING STRUCTURE
APPLICATIONS: SHAPE CONTROL OF AEROELASTIC STRUCTURES
REFLECTOR OR MIRROR CONTOUR CONTROL
POINTING OF PRECISION INSTRUMENTS
ACOUSTICAL CTRL OF STRUCTURE BORNE NOISE
KIRCHOFF−LOVE LAMINATED PLATE MODEL
GOVERNING FORCE AND MOMENT EQUATIONS
⎡ N ⎤ ⎡ A B ⎤ ⎡ε ⎤ ⎡ N ⎤ N = ∫t σdz NΛ = ∫tQΛdz Q=ELASTIC
⎢ ⎥ = ⎢B D⎥ ⎢ k ⎥ − ⎢M ⎥
0 Λ
⎣M⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ Λ
M = ∫t σzdz MΛ = ∫tQΛzdz
d COEFF
COEFF.
cs ka
STRUCTURE ACTUATOR
LUMPED DYNAMIC MODEL
P.GAUDENZI − ACTIVE MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES − PART 1
5. SENSING MECHANISMS
x3 PIEZO SENSOR
⎧E ⎫
SENSOR EQUATION: [D] = [ξ d]⎨ ⎬
⎩T ⎭ x1
+x1 +x2
f11 1
d31 x
q& (t) = i(t) = − h∫x bw
& ' ' dx
2
CURRENT MEASUREMENTS
f11 1
ALUMINUM
BEAM
SIGNAL
AMPL. CONDIT.
DISPLAC.
FILTER SENSOR
SINGLE CHIP
D/A MICROCOMP. A/D
CONTROL ISSUES:
LUMPED OR DISTRIBUTED CONTROL STRATEGIES
OPTIMAL CONTROL−CHOICE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION
CONTROL ALGORITHMS
PIEZO LEADS
STACKING SEQUENCE
2. GROUND TESTING
ALLEVIATE THE NECESSITY
SS OF PRECISELY
S MEASURING
S THE ACCURACY OF
THE STRUCTURE IN SPACE THROUGH GROUND TESTING BY PROVIDING THE
CAPABILITY TO ADJUST THE STRUCTURE TO ITS REQUIREMENTS DURING
ITS OPERATION IN SPACE
4. SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
RELAX THE CRITICALITY OF CONTROLLING AN OVERWHELMING NUMBER
OF PARAMETERS BY PROVIDING A DESIGN ADJUSTABLE DURING THE
MISSION TO MEET THE MISSION REQUIREMENTS
5. STATIC ADJUSTMENT
5
OPTIMAL STATIC CORRECTION OF SURFACE ERRORS; OPTIMAL LOCATION
OF ACTIVE MEMBERS TO CORRECT ANTICIPATED STRUCTURAL
DEFORMATION. THE STRUCTURE CAN LEARN THE CHANGES WITH TIME
AND ADJUST USING FEEDFORWARD APPROACHES
FROM WADA
− ELECTRONIC WATER−SKIS
(O’BRIEN INTERNATIONAL)
2. B.
2 B K.
K WADA,
WADA ˆOVERVIEW OF ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES FOR SPACE˜,
SPACE˜ ICAST
97, WAKIYAMA, JAPAN, OCT.29−31, 1997, PP.16−26