A Guide To Philosophical Research
A Guide To Philosophical Research
A
GUIDE TO
PHILOSOPHICAL
RESEARCH
i
Published in Nigeria in 2020 by
Krispolis
Abuja, Nigeria.
Printed by:
Assurance Print: 08067928847
ISBN: 978-978-980-260-9
ii
DEDICATION
For Prof. Zana Akpagu, who believed in me and graciously
facilitated my joining of the faculty of the University of
Calabar. I remain forever grateful to you.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE i
DEDICATION iii
TABLE OF COTENTS iv
PREFACE ix
v
3.4.3 Phenomenological Paradigm 38
3.4.4 Historical Paradigm 39
3.4.5 Experimental and Practical Paradigm 39
3.5 Philosophical Research Methods 41
vi
3.8 Basic Concepts in Philosophical Research 58
3.9 Sources of Error in Philosophical Research 63
3.9.1 Descriptive Chauvinism 63
3.9.2 Normative Chauvinism 63
4.5 Appendices 92
REFERENCES
viii
PREFACE
There is continuous search for method of doing philosophy
globally. The search for philosophical method is significant for
two reasons: one, philosophical method is an integral part of
the philosophical tradition inventing it, and two, (deriving from
the first) every philosophical method is itself limited by its very
conception. Since philosophy always works towards
overcoming any bias that limits it, the continuous search for
method become very important to philosophers globally.
Moreover, method of doing philosophy is of crucial concern to
students of philosophy in all traditions because the quality of
epistemological output of philosophical inquiry depends
largely on the method employed to conduct the inquiry. For
example, an analytic method in its pure format will always
produce analytic philosophy. This means that methodology
does not only validates a philosophy but it gives identity to a
philosophy – for it is by method a philosophy is determined as
either X or Y. Godwin Azenabor (2002) maintains this line of
thought that it is method – that is, how we investigate,
formulate and present ideas – that validates a philosophical
research as analytic, phenomenological, conversational, etc.
ix
formulate the problem at task. Moreover, “it is the subject-
matter that determines its own method” (Ibid.). This means that
there is no pre-arranged method for any philosophical
engagement ahead of the actual philosophizing; for the
problem would provide its own methods of engagement. What
this seems to mean is that the method for solving a given
problem is inherent in the very nature of the problem. That is to
say, the problem itself holds the clue to its solution. However,
to understand the methods or the problem-solving clues that a
given problem offers, the problem itself must be appropriately
and adequately understood, and properly formulated. Azenabor
has disputed Anyanwu’s claim and maintains that methodology
is indispensable to doing philosophy. According to him, “what
eludes Anyanwu is that in formulating a problem, a particular
methodology would eventually be used in analyzing or in
solving the problem; so we cannot really run away from the
question of methodology” (Azenabor 2002, 93).
I agree with Azenabor that methodology is fundamentally
important to analyzing any philosophy but that will apply to the
extent that the philosopher is merely analyzing and criticizing
some raw data already given. Methodology is equally
important to enable another philosopher to understand, test and
evaluate the validity of a given philosophical output within the
axiomatic system of that philosophy. However, there is merit in
Anyanwu’s claim that one does not really need a method for
every philosophical engagement. But one must equally note
that not every philosophical enterprise can be classified as a
philosophical research. Anyanwu seems to have misunderstood
the notion of method, for in renouncing method he failed to
understand that academic philosophy – which is mainly
criticism of existing philosophy – is basically research driven.
Research implies method/procedure. Indeed, as Azenabor
asserts, in doing academic philosophy the philosopher needs a
method.
x
Problem formulation and “definite knowledge of the basic
assumptions, concepts, models, theories and worldview of the
beliefs, judgments and values” that Anyanwu identified as
significant determinant of philosophical research are the
constitutive elements of any philosophical research method.
Without good problem formulation and “knowledge of the
basic assumptions, concepts, models, theories and worldviews”
of the subject-matter of the research, one cannot successfully
undertake a research programme. To enable good problem
formulation and understanding of the subject-matter (basic
assumptions, concepts, models, theories and worldviews), the
researcher requires systematic collection, analysis and
interpretation of philosophical data. The researcher needs to
clearly state the sources as well as procedure for collection,
analysis and interpretation of the data to enable the work to be
evaluated for its philosophic merits. Without these
methodological inputs, any work would pass as a philosophical
research. Akinpelu (2012) argues that if there was no
philosophical research methodology there would not have been
a philosophy because without it a researcher would not been
able to research for philosophical knowledge and having found
it would not have been able to validate it as such. The method
one uses to do philosophical research definitely affects the
quality of findings and its general output. The problems in a
given philosophy can therefore be traced to the methods
employed. The realization of this fact has pushed philosophers
to continue to search for a robust method of doing philosophy.
This book born out of observation of poorly designed research
method in most philosophical research done by undergraduate
and graduate students. Most of the research designs used by the
students are both inadequate and unsuitable for philosophical
research they claimed to conduct. The aim of this book is to
show the proper ways by which research method can be
designed to guide a philosophical research. The book
xi
highlights some philosophical research methods and further
shows how they can be modelled into research design by
researchers. It also highlights and explains some technicalities
and mechanics of philosophical research. I do not presume that
the issues discussed in this book are exhaustive. This book is
specifically designed for students who are preparing to
undertake research work in philosophy. It is my hope that
students and academics alike shall derive maximum benefits
from this book in terms of turning out philosophical research
works that compare favourably with works in other parts of the
world.
xii
REFERENCES
Agbakoba, J. (2009). “Philosophy and Traditional African
Ethics: the Problems of Economic Development.”
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 65(1/4), 549-575.
Akinpelu, J.A. (2012). Is there a Philosophical Research
Method in Education? Eds. A. Owan Enoh & Kola
Babarinde, A Guide to Philosophical Research in
Education, pp. 13-23. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden
Publishers Ltd.
Akoda, W.E. (2017). ABC of Project Writing for Researchers
and Students of the Humanities. Makurdi: Aboki
Publishers.
Anyanwu, K.C. (2000). The Problem of Method in African
Philosophy. Ed. C. S. Momoh, The Substance of
African Philosophy 2nd ed, pp. 57-73. Auchi: African
Philosophy Projects Publications.
- 100 -
Eyo, E.B. and Francis, D.A.I. (2017). "A Colloquy on Violence
and Non-Violence: Towards a Complementary Conflict
Resolution." American Journal of Social Issues and
Humanities, 7(2), 137-150.
- 101 -
Francis, D.A.I. (2016). "A Critical Examination of the
Question of Personhood in Stem Cell Research."
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(8), 06-13.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-2108090613
- 102 -
Ibanga, D.A. (2012). “Ethical Issues in Homosexuality.” Ed.
Ekwealo Chigbo Joseph, Applied and Practical Ethics:
A Simplified Course Text, pp. 115-132. Lagos: African
Environmental Ethics and Research Group.
- 103 -
Ibanga, D.A. (2017). "The Concept of Beauty in African
Philosophy." Africology: The Journal of Pan African
Studies, 10(7), 249-260.
Ibanga, D.A. (2017). “Is Deep Ecology Inapplicable in African
Context: A Conversation with Fainos Mangena.”
Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy,
Culture and Religion, 6(2), 101-119. DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ft.v6i2.6
Ibanga, D.A. (2017). “Patterns, Trends, and Issues of Illicit
Wildlife Hunting and Trade: Analysis Based on African
Environmental Ethics.” International Journal of
Development and Sustainability, 6(11), 1865-1890.
Ibanga, D.A. (2017). Philosophical Sagacity as Conversational
Philosophy and its Significance for the Question of
Method in African Philosophy. Filosofia Theoretica:
Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions,
6(1), 69-89. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ft.v6i1.4
Ibanga, D.A. (2018 Sept. 7). “Conversational Thinking and
Progress of Environmental Ethics in Africa.” The Social
Sciences, New Conservatisms and New Radicalisms,
42nd World Congress of the International Institute of
Sociology, University of the Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg.
- 104 -
Ibanga, D.A. (2018b). Renewable Energy Issues in African
Contexts. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 6(1),
117-133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7358/rela-2018-001-
iban
- 106 -
Nyerere, J.K. (1987). “Ujamaa – The Basis of African
Socialism.” The Journal of Pan African Studies, 1(1), 4-
11.
- 107 -
Oruka, O.H. (1998). Sage Philosophy. Ed. P. H. Coetzee & A.
P. J. Roux, The African Philosophy Reader, pp. 99-108.
London: Routledge.
Osuafor, C.C. (2003). Principles of Discourse Analysis.
Owerri: Global Press Limited.
Osuala, E.C. (2005). Introduction to Research Methodology,
3rd ed. Onitsha: Africana-First Publishers Limited.
Ozumba, G.O. (2015). The Transliteration Question in African
Philosophy. Ed. Jonathan O. Chimakonam, Atuolu
Omalu: Some Unanswered Questions in Contemporary
African Philosophy, pp. 171-185. Maryland: University
Press of America.
Plato (1997). Republic. Trans. Davis, John, and David
Vaughan. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Ltd.
Rodney, W. (2009). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.
Abuja: Panaf Publishing.
Rubin, A. & Babbie, E.R. (2008). Research Methods for Social
Work, 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.
Soyombo, O. (1996). Writing a Research Report. Eds.
Babatunde Ahonsi & Omololu Soyombo, Social
Research Methods and Applications, pp.347-390.
Ibadan: Caltop Publications (Nigeria) Limited.
Taylor, J. (1997). Share-Net: A Case Study of Environmental
Education Resource Material Development in a Risk
Society. Howick: Share-Net.
Twenty-Eight Days Later (2002). Directed by Danny Boyle,
produced by Alex Garland, Fox Searchlight Pictures.
- 108 -
Undergraduate Research Guidelines, Department of
Philosophy, University of Calabar. Published 2019.
Wiredu K. (1998). The Concept of Truth in the Akan
Language. Ed. P. H. Coetzee & A. P. J. Roux, The
African Philosophy Reader, pp. 234-239. London:
Routledge.
Wiredu, K. (1980). Philosophy and an African Culture.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiredu, K. (1995). Conceptual Decolonization in African
Philosophy: Four Essays. Ed. Olusegun Oladipo.
Ibadan: Hope Publications.
- 109 -
-0-