Advancements in Flip Chip Reinforcement and Durability
Advancements in Flip Chip Reinforcement and Durability
Tomas Sakatani
Abstract
The Flip Chip, also known as C4, is currently the most efficient electronic
packaging interconnection for small form factor integrations. Flip chip is a high
density, high I/O port application of silicon interconnections, but the method is flawed
when it comes to accounting for bending stress of the carrier substrate. This bending
stress is known to be the culprit for delamination of the interconnect solder joints.
Incorporated. These techniques focus on reinforcing the solder joint interconnection as well as
minimizing bending caused by the high density of solder joints. The techniques show an array
of ideas, such as replacing bumps with copper poles, adding metal poles in order to add
rigidity to the carrier substrate, addition of a glass plate on the Si die, and lastly laser cutting
an insulating material layer that isolates raised conductive poles to replace solder bumps and
Content
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
4. APPENDIX .................................................................................................... 10
1.4 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 10
i
1.Introduction
Since the inception of the Integrated Circuit (IC), semiconductor technologies were
developed such that hardware focuses on optimizing spatial footprint of the IC, as well as the
has led to a rapid growth for technology with a focus on portability and high performance.
technologies such as virtual Reality (VR), Artificial intelligence (AI), Augmented Reality
(AR), and 5G high frequency communications have outlined the shortcomings of the current
IC interconnection process. The heat generation that comes with high performance computing
and the vibrations from mobile integrations, are known to be the main culprit of bending
stress in IC chips. These new emerging technologies require a higher core layer count, as well
as larger packages to increase the density of electrical contacts. As the industry trends into
more intricate software processes the hardware manufacturing processes must follow; Thus,
the need to study ways in which the industry must move to implement these processes is
To move the industry forward, the way the IC interconnection is deployed must be
reviewed. The current standard in interconnection technologies is the use of a solder bumps
that are reinforced with a resin underfill. The use of underfill epoxy is prevalent in organic
flip chip packages to reduce shear strains in flip chip solder joints and thus enhance their
reliability. Although the underfill serves as a reinforcement, it has its own shortcomings; the
underfill adhesion [4]. Furthermore, underfill substrate failure is often associated with the
crystallization rate of the resin compared to the solder joint, and the stresses related to the
thermal expansion and contraction of the underfill resin. Underfill delamination originates at
the die periphery around the fillet region, especially at die corners where the die experiences
the most stresses. Under temperature cycling testing, or under field use condition, the
delamination at the die corner propagates through the flip chip bumps causing functional
failure of the chip [4]. With the exponential growth of mobile technologies reinforcement for
1
higher-than-normal temperatures as well as drop/impact reliability measures should be
considered.
Flip Chips as a standard practice, are manufactured with the use of an epoxy underfill that aids the
rigidity of the interconnection. Universal industries study [5] showcases the effects of mismatched
thermal expansion stress on the flip chip and the causes of it. The underfill of flip chips are much to
blame. The thermal expansion coefficients of solder and the underfill resin are different so the thermal
stresses developed. Furthermore, it was found that the underfill not only adhere weakly to the solder
joint but sometimes not at all, this is mainly towards the inner side of the dies and does not produce
imminent failure. If there was a delamination developed in the edge of the underfill, solder joint
failure tends to me almost instant. The use of alternatives to underfill are to be examined and to be
This report examines the both the root causes of flip chip underfill delamination as well
as the new trends in flip chip implementation design that allow chips to be both efficient and
mechanically robust. Manufacturers such as PPT [1] and TSMC [2][3], are developing new
ways to implement flip chips for new technology use, the vast majority being mobile use.
PPT and TSMC’s designs are aided by using underfill but reinforcing the solder joints from
IC to chip substrate, as well as replacing solder pads with raised copper poles. Similarly,
TSMC is also working on an IC package that would not require underfill resin which
mitigates some of the issues related to thermals and delamination. Other manufacturer
semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company. TSMC has been on the forefront
of the development of new flip chip solder joint reinforcement technologies as of recent years.
2
The increasing demand for mobility has driven the technology for looking for ways to make
One main technology developed by TSMC was US patent number US 8,810,025 B2 [3],
this development was a periphery reinforcement; it is industry knowledge that the edges of a
carrier substrate have the most shear stresses in a flip chip design. This phenomenon is cause
by bending of the chip carrier, which in part ends delaminating the solder joints. TSMC’s
design was to reinforce the edges of the carrier substrate, by adding an array of metal poles
(usually made of aluminum or copper) around the periphery of the substrate. This creates
added strengths that help counteract the bending, thus decreasing the delamination of the
Figure 1: US 8,810,025 B2, flip chip design. Cross section shows the location of the poles
Furthermore, the increase of strength in the substrate enables the SI die to be integrated
without the use of an extraneous substances or resin. This technique follows proven methods
for mechanical reinforcement used in the construction industry, i.e. The use of rebar in
concrete to add rigidity to the structure. The drawbacks of this type of structure and
3
reinforcement would be spatial. The space taken up by the poles means that the space that
could be used to create extra interconnections, is not used to create more rigidity to the flip
chip.
Capitalizing on creative ways to mitigate bending of the substrate TSMC Idealized a new
ON SUBSTRATE” this technique also focused on the root cause of interconnection failure.
This patent tackles this warping issue by increasing the thickness of the Si die by attaching a
glass layer on top. Furthermore, the patent goes as far as adding a layer of glass under the
carrier and adding notches into the glass layer so the layer attaches to the die more securely.
4
Figure 4: Reinforcement plate adhered to the top of the Si die interface, with reinforcement
notches added.
As shown above this method of reinforcement adds rigidity to the Si die/substrate interface,
through addition of a more mechanically strong material. the Si die is constricted by the plate
and it is sandwiched between the substrate and the plate. Noting that the addition of a plate
also adds more thickness, which itself deters the portability of the chip but it is deemed a
necessary addition for performance. Another drawback of this design is the thermal
conductivity of the Si die. Having to cool these chips would be deterred by the addition of 2
more layers to the heat transfer calculations. As seen on fig. 3, addition of notches to the top
of the Si die further adds to the rigidity by having greater surface area as well as diverting
They recently acquired a patent for reinforcement of interconnect bump structures, that is
very peculiar coming from an optics and laser company. This patent is not necessarily for
reliability of flip chips but for Focal Plane Array (FPA) instruments that uses flip chip
hybridization. Because of the flip chip’s high density of I/O ports and ease of integration, it
was deemed an ideal use for integration between the photodiode array (PDA) and the
5
In the patent by Sensors Unlimited the flip chip interconnection is handled by way of
introducing an insulating layer to the substrate as well as coating the insulating later with
dielectric material to introduce height, these layers are then etched into pockets where both
ends are opposite copies of each other. A final conductive material is added to make the
Figure 5: separated interconnect architecture of the flip chip integration[6]. Where 122 is the
Si die and 102 is the carrier substrate.
Figure 6: fully integrated invention[6]. Where 122 is the Si die and 102 is the carrier substrate.
The insulating material serves as a protective barrier for the solder bumps to make good
physical contact with eachother and for there not to be a short between bumps. This method
6
also does not include the use of epoxy resin to afix the Si die to the Substrate; the
interconnections are secured by both the dielectric material and the insulating material, which
brings rigidity that is achieved with epoxy otherwise. This design implementation requires
higher manufacturing costs and more advanced manufacturing techniques that would’t be
company that developed a similar interconnection scheme as Sensors Unlimited. For the same
reasonings as all the aforementioned companies, phoenix tackled these problems using raised solder
pads. They focused on the causes for delamination between the solder joint and solder pad; due to
bending of the die and substrate, solder joints tend to delaminate towards the copper pad joint on
the bottom. This is due the addition of torques caused by the bending. PPT decided t raise the
copper pad so it matches the height of the solder bump, thus requiring less solder to attach and
Figure 7: the carrier substrate before the implementation of the Si die. Shows the conductive pols
Another layer of reinforcement added to the substrate was the conductive pillars in the core
layer of the carrier substrate. These pillars due to their positioning on the substrate and change in
shape down the core, the pillar adds rigidity and helps combat bending. Although this is a
7
multilayered reinforcement, the Si die chip still requires a resin underfill to help with the bending of
the chip.
Noting the underfill and the poles on both the die and the substrate, the structure takes on an
3.Conclusion | Discussion
Underfill resin is both the current solution for premature flip chip failure and also a
stressor and aide for solder joint failure. The main focus of this report is to showcase
companies that are devising ways to mitigate the stresses. These stresses are caused by
mismatched thermals of underfill, as well as the bending stresses that come with flip chip
interconnections. TSMC’s inventions worked by Isolating a single problem with flip chip
integration. The Idea of placing reinforcement poles to reduce bending is a creative solution
to a problem, but the extra space that needed to be introduced defeats the point of making
technology smaller for certain applications. Furthermore, TSMC’s Idea of putting a Glass
substrate on top of the Si die was not properly executed. Both designs by TSMC add weight
that in part increases the chances of solder bumps touching each other as well as extra shear
8
stresses when the chip is not implemented with the solder pads facing down. PPT’s design
was clever, by having copper poles replace the solder bump, one decreases the wetting
angle of the solder interconnection that in part makes the interconnection stronger. But the
use of underfill in the design begs the question of how much more reliable this could be
instead of solder bumps. Lastly Sensors United’s Design was very well implemented, the
use of an insulator to virtually encapsulate solder joints and raise the pads so they meet in
the middle was a brilliant idea in terms of making sure the solder interconnect doesn’t bleed
into other joints as well as creating a more rigid structure between Si die and carrier
substrate. Also this is the most ideal design out there, one can ask the question of how does
te interconnection perform under heavy loads as well as the efficacy of the structure in term
of rigidity.
9
4.Appendix
1.4 References
[1]Phoenix Pioneer Technology CO., LTD., "FLIP-CHIP PACKAGE SUBSTRATE AND
METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME", US 2020/0066624 A1, 2020.
[2]Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company LTD, "REINFORCEMENT
STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WARPAGE OF CHIP
MOUNTED ON SUBSTRATE", US 2016/0315057 A1, 2020.
[3]Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd., "REINFORCEMENT
STRUCTURE FOR FLIP-CHIP PACKAGNG", US 8,810,025 B2, 2021.
[4]K. Sidharth, A. Dubey, C. Zhai and R. Blish, "Impact of Underfill Fillet Geometry on
Interfacial Delamination in Organic Flip Chip Packages", 56th Electronic Components
and Technology Conference 2006. Available: 10.1109/ectc.2006.1645871 [Accessed 7
March 2021].
[5]Universal Instruments, "Flip Chip Reliability", [Accessed 7 March 2021].
[6]Sensors Unlimited, Inc., "Bump structures for high density flip chip interconnection", US
10879204, 2020.
10