Department of Mechanical Engineering Me 321 Mechanical Measurements Experiment-5 Calibration of Force Transducer
Department of Mechanical Engineering Me 321 Mechanical Measurements Experiment-5 Calibration of Force Transducer
1 1 Introduction 0.5
2 2 Theory 0.5
3 2 Planning 0.5
4 3 Set Up 0.5
5 3 Procedure 0.5
8 1 Tables 1.0
9 2 Graphs 1.0
10 3 Results 0.5
11 4 Discussion 0.5
12 4 Conclusion 0.5
(𝑅1 and𝑅2 )
∆𝑒0 𝐺
= (𝜀1 − 𝜀2 )
𝑉𝑖 4
If 𝑅1 and 𝑅2 are attached to the cantilever beam.
Then
∆𝑒0 𝐺
= 𝜀𝑥
𝑉𝑖 2
∆𝑒 𝐺𝑉𝑖
𝑆𝑐 (Circuit sensitivity) = 𝑆 0 =
𝑥 2
On the left we see the unstressed molecular crystal lattice (in the center is the charge, which is
balanced in this case). On the right, the crystal is subjected to mechanical stress: the centers of
symmetry of the charges move apart and charge can be measured at the top and bottom of the
crystal.
The relationship between the mechanical stress applied to the crystal and the
change in charge is proportional. In other words, the greater the stress, the
greater the charge. This principle is exploited in piezoelectric force
measurement technology. For the crystal to become a transducer, however, it
needs something more. "The output signal does not depend on the size of the
sensor, and this is a particular advantage", says Thomas Kleckers.
As a rule, a sensor contains two crystal elements. An electrode is situated
between these crystals. This electrode picks up the charge on the inward
facing sides of the crystals. A cable connects the electrode to the charge
amplifier. In addition, the crystal disks are housed in a metal enclosure. This
not only protects the crystals, but also provides a second point of contact with
them, as it is connected to the charge amplifier via the cable shield.
Figure 7
The special property of piezoelectric force transducers is that they cover very
large measuring ranges. In other words, the same sensor can be used for
measuring both very small and very large forces. Piezoelectric force
transducers are therefore very flexible – and are available in miniature size
just a few millimeters thick. Their deformation under load is negligible due to
their high rigidity. Consequently, the sensor has an exceptionally low influence
over the structure in which it is integrated.
On the other hand, transducers are prone to drift: "The charge always finds
one way or another to balance itself out," says Thomas Kleckers. For this
reason, the difference in charge required for measurement cannot be
maintained indefinitely. It can be assumed that drift of 10 N/min maximum will
take place. Once the measurement chain has been broken in, this figure gets
much lower during service. It remains the same regardless of the force
measured, however. This means that drift has more of an impact if you
measure low forces over a long period of time than if you measure large
forces, or use short measurement times.
Table1
Figure 10(Weights)
Figure 11(Data acquisition system)
Figure 13
loading Unloading
Measured Measured Average
Force Strain Meter Force Force Strain Meter Force Measured
(N) ( strains) (N) (N) ( μ strains ) (N) Force
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Uncertainty Analysis:
Load = 6 N
2 33 4.455
3 33 4.455
4 32.5 4.3875
5 32.5 4.3875
6 32.5 4.3875
7 32.5 4.3875
8 33 4.455
Graphs.
9
8
y = 0.7501x 7.89
R² = 0.9957
6.615
Average Measured Force(N)
7
5.94
6
5.265
5
4.225
3.78
4
2.9025
3
2.1967
2 1.4175
1 0.675
0
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Force (N)
5
Measured Force(N)
4
Loading
Unloading
3
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Force (N)
Results
Uncertainty analysis
Load=6N
UB=1x10^-6 m UBP=0.135 N
Sx= 0.049505 N = 4.429375 N
𝑆𝑥
UP=t/2 =0.041437 N UT=√𝑈𝑃2 + 𝑈𝐵 2=0.14126 N
√𝑛
P= 4.429375 0.14126 N
Discussion.
We measured calibration of force transducers by applying different
loads. Then we took values of repeating the same load to
determine the uncertainty. Some of the error sources that could
exist in this experiment are briefly mentioned. First, beam wasn’t
straight neither exactly simply supported. Second, most off
instruments have error while measuring. Lastly, force position
could sometimes produce error.
Conclusion.
UT= ± (0.14126 ) N