Nuclear Technology Review 2004
Nuclear Technology Review 2004
NUCLEAR
The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency:
The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of
the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957.
The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is “to accelerate and
enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world’’.
© IAEA, 2004
Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be
obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, P.O. Box 100,
A-1400 Vienna, Austria.
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
August 2004
NTR2004E.book Page 3 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
CONTENTS
B. POWER APPLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
A. General Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
B. General Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
C. Utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
D. Nuclear Fuel Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
D.1. General Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
D.1.1. Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
D.1.2. Storage Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
D.2. Reduced enrichment for research and test reactors
(RERTR) and Fuel Return Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
D.2.1. RERTR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
D.2.2. Fuel Return Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
E. Decommissioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
A. International Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
B. The ‘Turnkey’ Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
C. Environmentalism, Slower Growth and Bad Management . . . 46
D. The 1990s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
B. Isotopic Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
C. Genomics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
D. Molecular Diagnostics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
E. Medical Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
NTR2004E.book Page 7 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
F. Livestock Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
G. Biochips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
H. Biopharmaceuticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
I. Scintillation Proximity Assay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
K. Vaccines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
L. Gene Therapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
B. Radioisotopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
B.1. Current Status of Radioisotope Production . . . . . . . . . 70
B.1.1. Radioisotopes for medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
B.1.2. Radioisotopes for industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
B.2. Future Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
C. Radiation Technology for Clean and Safe Industry . . . . . . . . . 73
C.1. Radiation Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
C.2. Radiotracers and Sealed Source Applications . . . . . . . 75
D. Nuclear Analytical Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
B. The Role of Nuclear Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
C. Current Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
D. Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
A. Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
B. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
C. Assessing the Impact of Nuclear Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
D. Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
E. Food and Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
F. Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
G. Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
H. Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
I. Frameworks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
J. Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
NTR2004E.book Page 1 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
1
NTR2004E.book Page 2 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
reactors are recorded in the IAEA’s Research Reactor Data Base (RRDB), of
which 274 are operational in 56 countries (85 in 39 developing countries), 214
are shut down, 168 have been decommissioned and 16 are planned or under
construction.
Many of those that are shut down, but not decommissioned, still have
fuel, both fresh and spent, at the sites. An extended delay between final
shutdown and decommissioning will affect both cost and safety at the time of
decommissioning, mainly due to the loss of experienced staff (already ageing at
the time of shut down) necessary to participate in decommissioning activities1.
Under-utilization of research reactors is an issue of concern in many
Member States. However, many research reactors in operation are extensively
used at both national and international level for radioisotope production, beam
line research, industrial applications, neutron irradiation and specialized appli-
cations. In addition, new multi-purpose and single-purpose research reactors
are being built.
Use of highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel is considered a potential
proliferation threat. To date, 31 research reactors have undergone full
conversion to low enriched uranium (LEU). Seven other research reactors
have been partially converted, while others are awaiting conversion. The
unavailability of a qualified high-density fuel, suitable for converting some
specific research reactors, is an important concern. The problem of using LEU
instead of HEU as target material in isotope production for medical applica-
tions is being given serious consideration.
Charged particle accelerators are powerful tools for a multitude of appli-
cations, such as probes for analysis of physical, chemical and biological
samples; ion beam modification of surfaces and materials for enhancing desired
properties; radioisotope production; radiation processing of materials and
radiotherapy of cancer. The demand for synchrotron radiation and high-
quality pulsed neutron beams from spallation sources used for materials
research is increasing.
A variety of radioisotopes (more than 150 in different forms), predomi-
nantly of reactor origin, are in extensive use. Radionuclides suitable for radio-
therapy and easily producible in research reactors, such as 177Lu are being
intensively evaluated for development of radiopharmaceuticals. Also, small
sealed sources of 125I and 103Pd are being researched for treatment of eye and
prostate tumours. Positron emission tomography (PET) tracers from medical
cyclotrons, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in particular, are making an
increasing impact, mainly in oncology.
1
Annex I refers.
2
NTR2004E.book Page 3 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
B. POWER APPLICATIONS
“The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor
kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformations
of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Lord Ernest Rutherford, 1933.
“It is not too much to expect that our children will enjoy in their homes
[nuclear generated] electrical energy too cheap to meter.” Lewis Strauss,
Chairman, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1954.
Half a century on, we know the truth lies somewhere between the
extremes3.
Nuclear power supplied 16% of global electricity generation in 2002, and
as of 31 December 2003 there were 439 NPPs operating worldwide (see
Table B-1). Their global energy availability factor has risen steadily from 74.2%
in 1991 to approximately 84% in 2003. In 2003 two new NPPs were connected
to the grid, a 665 MW(e) pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) in China
and a 960 MW(e) pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the Republic of Korea.
In addition Canada restarted two units that had been shutdown. Construction
started on one new NPP in India. Four 50 MW(e) units in the UK were retired,
as were one 640 MW(e) unit in Germany and one 148 MW(e) unit in Japan.
Current expansion and growth prospects are centred in Asia. Eighteen of
the 31 reactors under construction4 at the end of 2003 are located in China,
India, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea. Twenty-one of the last 30 reactors to have been connected to the grid
are in the Far East and South Asia.
In Western Europe, capacity is likely to remain relatively constant despite
nuclear phase-outs in Belgium (which passed its phase-out law in
January 2003), Germany and Sweden. The most advanced planning for new
nuclear capacity is in Finland. In 2003 the utility Teollisuuden Voima Oy
selected Olkiluoto as the site for a fifth Finnish reactor and signed a contract
with a Framatome ANP – Siemens consortium for a 1600 MW(e) European
pressurized water reactor. The construction licence application for the reactor
was submitted to the Finnish Government in January 2003.
2
Annex II refers.
3
Annex III refers.
4
The total includes also Taiwan, China.
3
NTR2004E.book Page 4 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
4
TABLE B-1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN OPERATION AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE WORLD
(AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2003)
Total Operating
Reactors in Reactors under Nuclear Electricity
Experience to
Operation Construction Supplied in 2003
COUNTRY Dec. 2003
No of Total No of Total
TW·h % of Total Years Months
Units MW(e) Units MW(e)
ARGENTINA 2 935 1 692 7.03 8.59 50 7
ARMENIA 1 376 1.82 35.48 36 3
BELGIUM 7 5 760 44.61 55.46 191 7
BRAZIL 2 1 901 13.34 3.65 25 3
BULGARIA 4 2 722 16.04 37.71 129 2
CANADA 16 11 323 70.29 12.53 486 11
CHINA 8 5 977 3 2 610 41.59 2.18 39 1
CZECH REPUBLIC 6 3 548 25.87 31.09 74 10
FINLAND 4 2 656 21.82 27.32 99 4
FRANCE 59 63 363 420.70 77.68 1 346 2
GERMANY 18 20 643 157.44 28.10 648 0
HUNGARY 4 1 755 11.01 32.69 74 2
INDIA 14 2 550 8 3 622 16.37 3.30 223 5
IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 2 2 111 0 0
JAPAN 53 44 139 3 3 696 230.80 25.01 1 123 7
KOREA, DEM. PEOPLE’S REP. OF 1 1 040 0 0
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 19 15 850 1 960 123.28 40.01 220 8
LITHUANIA 2 2 370 14.30 79.89 36 6
MEXICO 2 1 310 10.51 5.23 23 11
NETHERLANDS 1 449 3.80 4.48 59 0
PAKISTAN 2 425 1.81 2.37 35 10
NTR2004E.book Page 5 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
TABLE B-1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN OPERATION AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE WORLD
(AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2003)
Total Operating
Reactors in Reactors under Nuclear Electricity
Experience to
Operation Construction Supplied in 2003
COUNTRY Dec. 2003
No of Total No of Total
TW·h % of Total Years Months
Units MW(e) Units MW(e)
ROMANIA 1 655 1 655 4.54 9.33 7 6
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 30 20 793 3 2 825 138.39 16.54 761 4
SLOVAKIA 6 2 442 2 776 17.86 57.35 100 6
SLOVENIA 1 656 4.96 40.45 22 3
SOUTH AFRICA 2 1 800 12.66 6.05 38 3
SPAIN 9 7 584 59.36 23.64 219 2
SWEDEN 11 9 451 65.50 49.62 311 1
SWITZERLAND 5 3 220 25.93 39.73 143 10
UKRAINE 13 11 207 4 3 800 76.70 45.93 279 10
UNITED KINGDOM 27 12 052 85.31 23.70 1 329 8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 104 98 298 763.74 19.86 2 871 8
Total 439 361 094 31 25 387 2524.03 11 143 5
5
NTR2004E.book Page 6 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
6
NTR2004E.book Page 7 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
500
450 SF Stored
400 SF Reprocessed
350
SF (1000 t)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Year
FIG. B-1. Cumulative worldwide spent fuel reprocessing and storage, 1990–2020.
7
NTR2004E.book Page 8 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
decision ‘in principle’ to build a final repository for spent fuel near Olkiluoto.
Separate construction and operating licences will also be required.
Construction should start in 2011 and operation in 2020. Sweden has begun
detailed geological investigations at two candidate sites. These should run for
five or six years, and the Swedish nuclear fuel and waste management company,
SKB, hopes to make a final site proposal by about 2007. The Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant in the USA began accepting military transuranic waste in 1999 for
permanent disposal in bedded salt. In 2002, the US President and Congress
decided to proceed with the Yucca Mountain disposal site, operations at which
are planned to begin in 2010. Although the present focus remains on estab-
lishing national repositories, there is renewed interest in the possibility of
regional or international repositories. One reason is the interest noted below in
increasing international control of nuclear material as one effort to strengthen
the global non-proliferation regime. The other is the reality that for countries
with no good waste sites, or with small research and power programmes,
individual national disposal sites make no economic sense.
Proliferation resistance: Proliferation resistance is that characteristic of a
nuclear energy system that impedes the diversion or undeclared production of
nuclear material, or misuse of technology, in order to acquire nuclear weapons
or other nuclear explosive devices. The degree of proliferation resistance
results from a combination of, inter alia, technical design features, operational
modalities, institutional arrangements and safeguards measures. Most recently,
in particular in the context of ongoing work for innovative reactors and fuel
cycles, increased attention is being paid to the issue of intrinsic proliferation
resistance features, i.e. those features that result from the technical design of
nuclear energy systems, as well as to extrinsic proliferation resistance measures,
i.e. those measures that result from States’ decisions and undertakings related
to nuclear energy systems. The ongoing work on new reactor types and fuel
cycles includes in all cases considerations about such proliferation resistance
features and measures that help ensure that future nuclear energy systems will
continue to be an unattractive means to acquire materials for a nuclear
weapons programme.
Each year the Agency publishes updated medium term nuclear energy
projections, and in 2003 these were extended for the first time to 2030 (see
Table B-2). The low projection essentially assumes no new NPPs beyond what
8
NTR2004E.book Page 9 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
North America 04779 851.1 17.8 05034 874 17.0 05784 870.0 15.0 06451 844 13.0
05444 894 16.0 06709 939.0 14.0 08146 944 12.0
Latin America 01078 28.6 2.7 01178 29 2.5 01628 47.0 2.9 02227 30 1.3.0
01427 38 2.7 02291 50.0 2.2 03758 92 2.4.0
Western Europe 03084 880.2 28.5 03352 858 26.0 03634 823.0 23.0 03942 564 14.0
03609 893 25.0 04687 961.0 20.0 06061 1090 18.0
Eastern Europe 01758 298.5 17.0 01884 319 17.0 02174 423.0 19.0 02463 378 15.0
02074 399 19.0 02867 552.0 19.0 04133 611 15.0
Africa 00459 12.0 2.6 00538 13 2.5 00699 14.0 2.0 00876 14 1.6
00612 14 2.3 00973 24.0 2.4 01530 60 3.9
Middle East and South Asia 01176 19.6 1.7 01342 41 3.1 01805 53.0 3.0 02327 70 3.0
01626 47 2.9 02596 100.0 3.9 03946 194 4.9
South East Asia and the Pacific 00600 00736 00934 01162
00786 01119 5.5 0.5 01584 18 1.2
Far East 03157 484.3 15.3 03399 695 20.0 04199 855.0 20.0 05073 981 19.0
04296 702 16.0 06605 1125.0 17.0 09830 1361 14.0
Low Estimate 16090 2574.2 16.0 17463 2830 16.0 20857 3085.0 15.0 24520 2881 12.0
World Total
High Estimate 19873 2987 15.0 27848 3756.0 13.0 38989 4369 11.0
9
NTR2004E.book Page 10 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
is already being built or firmly planned today, plus the retirement of old NPPs.
The projection was revised upward in 2003 and projects a 20% increase in
global nuclear generation up until the end of 2020 (compared to a 2%
projected increase last year), followed by a decrease, resulting in global nuclear
generation in 2030 only 12% higher than in 2002. Nuclear power’s share of
global electricity generation decreases after 2010 to 12% in 2030, compared to
16% in 2002. Increases are most substantial in the Far East, and decreases are
greatest in Western Europe.
In the high projection, global nuclear generation steadily increases by a
total of 46% through 2020 (unchanged from last year’s high projection) and by
70% through 2030. There are increases in all regions, again led by the Far East.
However, overall electricity generation increases even faster than nuclear
power, causing nuclear power’s share of overall electricity to decline. By 2030
the nuclear share is down to 11%.
For the longer term, the key question is how long nuclear resources might
last. Known conventional resources are sufficient for a number of decades at
current usage rates as shown in Table B-3, although the period for which
resources are sufficient decreases the more nuclear power is assumed to grow
in the future. As is also shown in the table, undiscovered conventional
resources increase the period for which resources are sufficient to several
hundred years if the necessary (and substantial) exploration and development
investments are made. Unconventional resources, including phosphate deposits
and seawater, contain vast amounts of very dilute uranium, and their use could
fuel nuclear energy for millennia if advanced extraction methods are
developed. Currently, only laboratory-scale quantities have been extracted
from seawater, and the projected cost is approximately five to ten times the
cost of conventionally mined uranium. Significant effort and investment would
be needed before these resources could become available.
Thorium is three times as abundant in the earth’s crust as uranium.
Natural thorium is essentially 100% thorium-232, which is not fissile. It is
however fertile, absorbing slow neutrons to become fissile thorium-233. Thus a
future thorium-based fuel cycle to generate electricity from this resource could
significantly extend the lifetime of global nuclear resources.
Nuclear energy, as well as renewables, could meet a larger share of the
world’s growing energy needs through the development of hydrogen fuel
cell vehicles and other hydrogen applications. Hydrogen can be produced
from water using electricity, the principal product of nuclear energy and of
renewable technologies like wind power. An economical conversion process,
10
NTR2004E.book Page 11 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
(1) Known conventional resources include all cost categories of reasonably assured
resources (RAR) and estimated additional resources – category I (EAR-I) for a total
of 4 588 700 tU.6
(2) Total conventional resources include all cost categories of reasonably assured
resources, estimated additional resources, and speculative resources for a total of
14 382 500 tU.
(3) Total resources assume conventional resources of 14 382 500 tU, plus 90% of
phosphate resources of 22 000 000 tU (= 19 800 000 tU), plus 10 % of the estimated
seawater uranium resources of 4 000 000 000 tU (= 400 000 000 tU) for a total of
434 182 500 tU.
56
Attention!!! Before printing change colour to white
5
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency,
Uranium 2003: Resources, Production and Demand, OECD, Paris, 2004.
6
Full definitions of RAR and EAR-I are given in Uranium 2003 : Resources,
Production and Demand. Briefly, RAR refers to uranium occurring in known mineral
deposits and recoverable with current technology. EAR-I refers to uranium, in addition
to RAR, that is inferred to occur based on direct geological evidence.
11
NTR2004E.book Page 12 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
7
Annex IV refers.
12
NTR2004E.book Page 13 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Both Canada and India are working on advanced heavy water reactor
designs, and a number of advanced gas cooled reactor designs are being
developed with participation from China, France, Germany, Japan, the Russian
Federation, South Africa, the UK and the USA. For liquid metal cooled fast
reactors, development activities are underway in China, France, India, Japan,
the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation. Development activities for
lead alloy and sodium liquid metal cooled fast reactor systems and for gas
(helium) cooled fast reactors are being conducted within the Generation IV
International Forum (GIF) and in the Russian Federation. Research on fast
neutron spectrum hybrid systems (e.g. accelerator driven systems) is underway
in the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, the USA and eight EU
countries.
Complementing the many initiatives above are two major international
efforts to promote innovation — GIF and the Agency’s International Project
on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO). Members of GIF
are Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Japan, the Republic of Korea, South
Africa, Switzerland, the UK, the USA and Euratom. GIF has reviewed a wide
range of innovative concepts and, in 2002, selected six types of reactor systems
for future bilateral and multilateral cooperation: gas cooled fast reactors, lead
alloy liquid metal cooled reactors, molten salt reactors, sodium liquid metal
cooled reactors, supercritical water cooled reactors and very high temperature
gas reactors.
Members of the Agency’s INPRO project are Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria,
Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, the
Netherlands, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Spain, South Africa,
Switzerland, Turkey and the European Commission. INPRO published an
initial report in 2003 that outlined the potential of nuclear power and specified
guidelines and a methodology for evaluating innovative concepts. It is now
validating that methodology through test applications in a series of case studies.
Much of the current experimental and theoretical research on nuclear
fusion is focused on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor
(ITER). ITER’s ‘engineering design activities’ stage has been completed, and
the project is nearing a decision on site selection. In 2003, it gained three new
members, with China, the Republic of Korea and the USA (which had
originally left ITER in 1999) now joining the EU, Japan and the Russian
Federation. The two proposed sites are in France and Japan.
Research also continues on other magnetic confinement approaches, and
inertial confinement is being developed intensively by national programmes in
France and the USA. The National Ignition Facility in the USA is scheduled for
completion in 2008.
13
NTR2004E.book Page 14 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
14
NTR2004E.book Page 15 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
In recent years, the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) has become a more
cost-effective technology for fruit fly suppression, capable of competing in cost
with conventional insecticide-based suppression.
One of the most relevant improvements has been the development of
genetic sexing strains (GSS) such as the male-only medfly temperature
sensitive lethal (tsl) strains, which have reduced by half transportation and
release costs and have increased the effectiveness of the sterile males in the
field at least by three fold. The use of male-only strains is now the norm for
medfly SIT and countries that have acquired medfly rearing capacity have now
incorporated the GSS into their mass production processes.
It has been estimated that the potential demand for sterile medflies in the
Mediterranean basin alone amounts to at least 4 billion sterile males per week,
close to the total number currently being produced worldwide. Continuous
improvements and new scientific developments augur a promising future for
SIT for a number of species of economic importance such as false codling moth,
codling moth, date moth, bollworms and various other pest insects, including
sweet potato weevils. Also development of genetic sexing strains for other key
insect pests to enhance the cost-effectiveness of SIT technology will continue to
be a focus of research and development.
Screwworm eradication using SIT from all of North and Central America
at an overall cost of ca. $1 billion, is estimated to provide annual benefits to the
livestock industry in this region that exceed the overall investment in the
eradication campaign of over 45 years. However, in Africa tsetse fly
transmitted trypanosomosis makes the introduction of productive mixed
farming and livestock systems impossible. Overall losses due to trypanosomosis
in the agricultural gross domestic products of tsetse-infested countries in Sub-
Saharan Africa are estimated at $4.75 billion per year.
Internationally agreed priority areas for agricultural development have
been identified, where tsetse and trypanosomosis intervention, including the
SIT component, would likely generate quick, tangible and sustainable benefits
in the context of agricultural development and ecologically appropriate
utilization of resources. Internationally concerted action in these priority areas
is most advanced in the Ethiopian Southern Rift Valley, where preliminary
cost-benefit analyses predict a break-even point of benefits over investments
made after 5–6 years and an internal rate of return over a 12-year period
15
NTR2004E.book Page 16 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
between 33% and 43%. The Arab Organization for Agricultural Development,
the FAO and the Agency continue to collaborate in a joint regional feasibility
project against the Old World screwworm fly in the West Asia region.
Research aimed at improving animal production and health in the
developed world has been revolutionized by recent developments in biotech-
nology, in particular those related to gene-based technologies. These develop-
ments enable new and innovative approaches to find unique solutions to both
emerging and old problems.
In animal production, the characterization of livestock genomes will
enable the identification of advantageous genes, such as those responsible for
natural resistance to diseases or the ability to thrive under climatic or
nutritional stress. Hybridization and related techniques that employ 32P and
other isotopic markers together with non-isotopic molecular tools for identifi-
cation of genes, microsatellites and quantitative trait loci will allow the
selection and breeding of resistant animals, thus enhancing or replacing
conventional methods of disease control.
Notwithstanding developments, the more ‘mature’ nuclear technologies
such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), employing 125I to measure hormones and
metabolites in the blood or milk of animals, continue to be widely used. RIA
for the hormone progesterone is an indispensable tool that provides
information both on problems in breeding management by farmers as well as
deficiencies in the artificial breeding services provided to them by government,
co-operative or private organizations. RIA is also a cheap and robust method
for the detection of harmful residues in food of animal origin, such as those
arising from the misuse of veterinary drugs.
Molecular diagnostics have entered an exciting era in animal health,
increasing the sensitivity and specificity of tests to detect animal diseases. An
important goal of many diagnostic devices is the ability to perform point-
of-care testing to ensure speedy and accurate pathogen detection. Improve-
ments in instrumentation and its availability will enable technologies such as
‘35S/32P phospho-imaging gene sequencing’ to be implemented in developing
countries. Developments in microfabrication technology, microfluidics and
nanotechnology are promising to produce more sensitive, rapid and robust
devices that have the ability to perform under diverse conditions. Lab-on-
a-chip devices offer the ability to integrate sample processing, target amplifi-
cation and detection in a single miniaturized device. Leading on from such
technologies will be the development of diagnostic kits based on biochips
capable of detecting multiple infective agents (i.e. antigen) or presence of
pathogen (i.e. antibody) in a single, highly sensitive, specific and fast assay.
Their adaptation for field use will clearly revolutionize the diagnosis,
16
NTR2004E.book Page 17 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
8
Annex V refers.
17
NTR2004E.book Page 18 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
18
NTR2004E.book Page 19 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
C.7.1. Nutrition
19
NTR2004E.book Page 20 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Diagnostic applications
Nuclear medicine imaging and non-imaging functional studies offer
diagnostic and research applications of internally administered open sources of
radioactivity. There is also an increase of therapeutic applications. These
techniques are used in several specialties such as cardiology, oncology,
nephrology, neurology, infections and genetics.
Nuclear medicine imaging and non-imaging functional studies: Gamma
Camera and SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) are used
routinely in clinical medicine providing both static and dynamic information
leading to diagnosis and prognosis of diseases, determination of organ function
and valuable information about treatment response. Positron emission
tomography (PET) has emerged as a powerful tool to diagnose disease earlier,
determine its extent and response to treatment, estimate residual disease after
treatment, predict prognosis and understand bio-molecular behaviour. PET is
making rapid strides in the developed countries but complexity and cost restrict
its routine clinical use in most developing countries.
The use of gamma probes for the detection and biopsy of the sentinel
lymph node has revolutionized patient management in surgical oncology and
changed the concept of managing malignant melanomas and breast and colon
cancers.
Molecular nuclear medicine techniques: Molecular methods have appli-
cations in rapid disease screening and diagnosis, pathogenesis, guiding
therapeutic decisions, monitoring and management, epidemiological investiga-
tions, immunology, pharmacogenomics and molecular designing of new drugs
and vaccines. A key element involving these techniques is the amplification of
pathogen specific gene sequence by polymerase chain reaction, which is used to
detect mutations responsible for drug resistance in malaria and tuberculosis, as
well as sub typing of HIV and designing vaccines against it.
Radiopharmacology and radioimmunotechnology: Radiopharmacology
deals with tracer kinetics and development and evaluation of various radiop-
harmaceuticals. The introduction of new tracers and innovative applications
may have a significant impact on health care services such as oncology,
cardiology and infections.
Medical radioimmunoassay and immunotechnology constitute a
significant component of the in vitro diagnostic system for quantification of
changes in proteins as well as other important intermediate metabolites in
disease states especially in developing countries. They are also being used in
developmental work to explore novel methods for patent applications, and as
reference standards for verification of non-isotopic assays.
20
NTR2004E.book Page 21 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Therapy
High-dose rate brachytherapy: In recent years, high-dose rate (HDR)
brachytherapy has become a very important component of the treatment of
uterine cervix cancer. In contrast to low-dose rate brachytherapy equipment
that had been traditionally employed but could only treat 2–3 patients each
week, HDR allows dozens of patients to be treated each day along with unprec-
edented possibilities for radiation dose optimization.
Profiling of genes and proteins: Genomic and proteomic revolutions in
biology and medicine mean that large-scale microarrays have recently become
available that can analyse several thousand genes or proteins in a short period
of time. This technology holds great promise for pre-selecting future patients
and/or cancers with regard to their response to radiation.
Stem-cell therapeutics: Radiotherapy has long been utilized as a part of
the preparatory regimen for bone-marrow transplantation. Recent research
suggests that radiotherapy, in conjunction with cellular or stem cell transplan-
tation, could also play a valuable role in the regeneration of other organs as
well, such as the liver, pancreas and the central nervous system.
21
NTR2004E.book Page 22 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
22
NTR2004E.book Page 23 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
treatment plants are operating in coal-fired plants in China and Poland (in both
cases purification of flue gases from 100 MW(e) blocks), with high efficiency of
SOx and NOx removal. Nuclear technologies, involving electron beams, electro-
magnetic radiation or isotopic sources, have also been used for decontami-
nating and disinfecting aqueous effluents, sewage waters, industrial
wastewaters and sludge by destroying harmful and toxic organic substances and
micro-organisms. A combined technology, using an electron beam and ozone,
has been developed for the removal of chlorinated hydrocarbons from drinking
water. Another application permits the radiation sanitation of biological sludge
from biological wastewater treatment, allowing the sludge eventually to be
used as fertilizer.
Humanitarian demining
Abandoned landmines from past and present armed conflicts continue to
pose a threat to populations in more than 60 countries in the developing world.
A typical anti-personnel landmine contains very little metal and is therefore
difficult to detect by normal metal detection means. Very sensitive metal
detectors can detect low-metal content landmines, but they cannot distinguish
between mines and other small, buried metal objects, such as shrapnel
fragments. A nuclear method based on interrogation by neutrons is one of the
few methods that enable non-intrusive elemental analysis of buried objects,
detecting the hydrogen content of the mine explosive. An instrument based on
a pulsed electrostatic neutron generator (PELAN, Pulsed Elemental Analysis
by Neutrons) for humanitarian demining has been the basis for much research
and shows promise. Tests showed that the PELAN device could reliably
identify anti-tank mines with 5–6 kg of TNT buried under 15 cm of soil and
anti-personnel mines with 200g of TNT under 5 cm of soil. A definitive
conclusion could not be reached in the case of detecting smaller anti-personnel
mines, and detection limits still need to be improved. To achieve full success,
23
NTR2004E.book Page 24 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
9
Annex VI refers.
24
NTR2004E.book Page 25 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
have already been tested, and other possible applications are concerned with
conductive and multiphase polymers.
Radiotracers in industry and environment provide invaluable tools in
many processes, for example in oil fields and refineries, chemical and metallur-
gical industries and wastewater purification installations. Common radioiso-
topes for tracers are 3H, 82Br, 99mTc, 140La, 24Na and 131I.
10
Annex VII refers.
25
NTR2004E.book Page 26 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Nuclear technology and techniques produce energy, make our food safer
and more abundant, help prevent, diagnose, and cure disease, optimize
sustainable water use, and protect the environment. Nuclear techniques have
made significant contributions and have the potential to contribute much more
in key areas of concern to the international community as identified by the
World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg 2002 — water,
energy, health, agriculture and biodiversity.
Their impact on future generations needs to be understood, because they
affect a society’s resources, institutions, public knowledge, human capital,
manufactured capital and natural capital. In an increasingly globalized world,
national or regional contributions may also benefit the global community and
not just a single society. On the national and regional levels, nuclear sciences
and applications are core disciplines on the road to a technologically advanced
society. All countries take advantage of nuclear applications, especially in
health care. While utilization increases dramatically with countries’ social,
technological, and economic development, significant socio-economic benefits
can be obtained at all levels of development. To realize these benefits, radio-
26
NTR2004E.book Page 27 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
11
Annex VIII refers.
27
NTR2004E.book Page 28 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
A. General Status
For over 50 years, research reactors (RR) have made valuable contribu-
tions to the development of nuclear power, basic science, materials devel-
opment, radioisotope production for medicine and industry, and education and
training. As of June 2004, the Agency’s Research Reactor Database contains
information on 672 RR, of which 274 are operational in 56 countries (85 in
39 developing countries), 214 are shutdown, 168 have been decommissioned
and 16 are planned or under construction.
It is of concern that many of the shutdown, but not decommissioned,
reactors still have fuel, both fresh and spent, at the sites. An extended delay
between final shutdown and decommissioning will affect both cost and safety at
the time of decommissioning, mainly due to the loss of experienced staff
(already ageing at the time of shutdown) necessary to participate in decommis-
sioning activities.
The distribution of the number of countries with at least one RR peaked
at 60 countries in the mid-eighties, coinciding with the peak at 41 for
developing countries. The number of countries with at least one RR remained
almost constant for industrialized countries from 1965 and for developing
countries from 1985 to the present. Four industrialized countries and three
Number of reactors
450
220
200 190 190
173
150 155
100
86 89 84 86 86
73 79
50 55
38 41
14 18
0 6
0 0 0
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2002
Years
28
NTR2004E.book Page 29 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Other Developing
26% Canada
3%
Germany
4%
France
China 5%
5%
United Kingdom
1%
Japan
Other Industrial
7%
9%
Russian Federation
United States of America
21%
19%
FIG. I.2. Operational research reactors in IAEA Member States – 273 reactors.
250
189
200
150
101
90
100 78 75
52
34 38
50 29
13
4
0
1945-1954
1955-1964
1965-1974
1975-1984
1985-1994
1995-2002
Year
29
NTR2004E.book Page 30 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
however, that new research reactors are unnecessary – eight are currently
under construction and eight more are planned. For the most part these are
innovative, multipurpose reactors designed to produce high neutron fluxes.
Many will meet all the nuclear research and development needs envisioned in
the countries in which they are being built, and will offer opportunities for
visiting scientists from abroad. In addition, some will provide radioisotopes
locally and regionally.
Figure I.4 shows the age distribution for operational research reactors. It
peaks around 40 years, with almost 65% of operating reactors being more than
30 years old. While a few of these old reactors give cause for safety concerns,
the majority have been refurbished at least once so that their key components
meet modern safety and technology standards. Figure I.5 shows the power
distribution of operating research reactors. The thermal power distribution of
operating RR indicates that a large fraction of RR, 77%, are less than 5 MW, so
that, even in the worst case accidental scenario, there will not be any significant
consequences off site. Fifty percent of operational RR are less than 100 kW,
consequently they operate with a lifetime core and so no spent fuel problems
will arise until these reactors are shut down permanently. But many of them
operate with highly enriched uranium fuel (HEU), i.e., a 235U concentration ≥
20%. HEU programmes are discussed in more detail in Section D of this
annex, along with other special fuel cycle challenges associated with research
reactors.
Research reactors present special challenges in the back end of the fuel
cycle because many different designs using a large variety of fuel types have
been built, often for special purposes. These include the management of exper-
imental and exotic fuels with no reprocessing route, and significant numbers of
Number of reactors
20
18
16
14
12
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Years of operation
FIG. I.4. Age distribution of research reactors in the RRDB: Number of reactors and
years in operation.
30
NTR2004E.book Page 31 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
23 MW - 85 MW
6 MW - 20 MW >=100 MW
7%
12% 4%
1.1 MW - 5 MW
12% < 1 kW
26%
200 kW - 1 MW
15%
1 kW - 100 kW
24%
FIG. I.5. Pie chart showing distribution of thermal powers of operating reactors.
B. General Trends
31
NTR2004E.book Page 32 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Currently, there are eight new research reactors under construction and
plans for about eight more. As is usual in the case of research reactors, they
vary significantly in power, type and purpose. There is one 30 kW Miniature
Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) that will be used primarily for education and
training, plus some neutron activation analysis (NAA) related to national
interests in assessing pollution, mineral resources and soil fertility. Two or three
facilities will be 1-2 MW multipurpose reactors of the TRIGA type used for a
wide gamut of applications including education and training, some limited
isotope production, neutron radiography and neutron beam-based materials
research. They may also be used for silicon doping and boron neutron capture
therapy.
There are several 10-100 MW compact core reactors with D2O reflectors
either being planned or under construction. Their primary purpose will be to
provide high flux beams for state-of-the-art materials analysis instruments, but
they will also be suitable for most of the other standard applications listed
above, including significant isotope production. Four or five of the new reactors
will be dedicated to single purposes, such as isotope production, testing
materials and components for power reactors or desalination. Finally, one or
two research reactors under consideration would be intended as prototypes for
advanced power reactor designs.
Of the research reactors currently operating, many will continue to
prosper by finding niches to exploit – such as providing test loops simulating
power reactor conditions, neutron activation analysis services, gem colouring,
silicon doping, and isotope production – and by being flexible enough to exploit
other opportunities as they arise. At the same time these facilities provide
important training for the scientists and engineers who are essential for
continued progress in nuclear research and development.
Many of the higher flux, high utilization research reactors have recently
been significantly upgraded, usually to improve the neutron flux, particularly
for beam research. In this context, the modifications have involved making the
reactor core more compact, increasing the power, and changing reflectors, as
well as upgrading or adding cold sources. Whenever beam fluxes are increased,
there is naturally a tendency to also add new instruments such as Ultra-Small
Angle Neutron Scattering instruments or Spin-Echo spectrometers. Other
major modifications have been undertaken recently to enable or enhance
boron neutron capture therapy. The pioneering facilities generally add fission
converters to obtain a higher epithermal flux, while others modify thermal
columns or beam tubes to enable them to perform capture therapy studies,
either for research or treatment.
32
NTR2004E.book Page 33 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
C. Utilization
The climate for research reactors has changed in recent years. The
original mission of some facilities has been accomplished or become obsolete.
In other cases, applications can now be done better or more cheaply using
newer technology. Tight budgets and changing priorities have caused some
governments to cut back baseline support. The stagnation or decline of nuclear
power in many industrialized countries has reduced the demand for nuclear
education and training, and simulators have taken over some of the training of
nuclear power plant operators previously provided by research reactors.
33
NTR2004E.book Page 34 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
D.1.1. Inventories
The Agency has circulated questionnaires for its Research Reactor Spent
Fuel Database (RRSFDB), and responses indicate that there are 62 027 spent
fuel assemblies in storage and another 24 338 assemblies in the standard cores.
Of the 62 027 in storage, 45 108 are in industrialized countries and 16 919 are in
developing countries; 21 732 are HEU and 40 295 are LEU (low enriched
uranium). The majority use standard types of fuel plus aluminium cladding,
although some TRIGA fuel elements have stainless steel cladding. The
remaining non-standard fuel types in 59 facilities pose special problems both
for their continued safe storage and for their eventual final disposition.
Figure I.6 compares the numbers of US-origin and Russian-origin HEU and
LEU spent fuel assemblies at foreign research reactors that might be involved
in take-back programmes. Currently 12 850 spent fuel assemblies of US-origin,
and 21 732 of Russian-origin, are located at foreign research reactors.
Wet storage is the most popular storage technology for storing research
reactor spent fuel. However, successful storage of aluminium-clad fuel depends
on very strict water quality control. Although aluminium clad research reactor
fuel has been successfully stored in water for over 40 years without significant
signs of corrosion, penetration of the fuel cladding by pitting corrosion has
25000
HEU
20000 16641
16263
15000 11476
10000 7428
5000 8306 8458 10544
5779
0
USA 2000 USA 2006 RUSSIA 2000 RUSSIA 2006
ORIGIN OF ENRICHMENT
FIG. I.6. Present and projected US and Russian origin spent fuel at foreign research
reactors potentially involved in take-back programmes.
34
NTR2004E.book Page 35 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
occurred in as little as 45 days in cases where water quality has been allowed to
deteriorate. Aluminium racks, tanks and pool liners used in storing aluminium
clad fuel are equally vulnerable to corrosion and thus limit the life time of spent
fuel storage facilities.
Research reactor fuel has also been successfully stored dry in vaults,
concrete canisters and hot cells over long periods. Where problems have arisen,
they have invariably been due to a long-term undetected ingress of water or
moisture.
D.2. Reduced enrichment for research and test reactors (RERTR) and
Fuel Return Programmes
D.2.1. RERTR
35
NTR2004E.book Page 36 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
36
NTR2004E.book Page 37 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
March 2004. The fresh HEU fuel was shipped to the Russian Federation, which
agreed to its return.
E. Decommissioning
A breakdown of the statistical data used for Figure I.3 into shutdown and
not yet decommissioned (‘shutdown (NYD)’) and decommissioned research
reactors for individual regions and Member States yields a more precise picture
of the importance of decommissioning issues. At present, close to 60% of the
‘shutdown (NYD)’ research reactors are located in North America with a
further 12% in the Russian Federation. About 10% of ‘shutdown (NYD)’
research reactors are in developing Member States and distributed as follows:
Asia-Pacific - 10; Eastern Europe - 8; Latin America - 4; and Africa and Middle
East - 3.
However, as discussed in Section A, many of the operating research
reactors in these regions are over 30 years old and a significant number will join
the shutdown list in the next few years.
With respect to operational research reactors to be shut down and
decommissioned in the future, a meaningful breakdown of the numbers is
difficult, because future plans remain open for many countries.
37
NTR2004E.book Page 38 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
There were six retirements in 2003, the four 50 MW(e) units at Calder
Hall in the UK, the 640 MW(e) unit at Stade in Germany and the Fugen ATR
148 MW(e) unit in Japan. There had been four retirements in 2002 (Kozloduy-
1 and -2 in Bulgaria and Bradwell units A and B in the UK) and no retirements
in 2001.
In 2003, construction started on just one new NPP, a 202 MW(e) PHWR
in India.
Current expansion, as well as near-term and long-term growth prospects,
are centred in Asia. As shown in Table II.1, of 31 reactors under construction13
worldwide at the end of 2003, 18 are located either in China, the Republic of
Korea, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Japan or India. Twenty-one
of the last 30 reactors to have been connected to the grid are in the Far East and
South Asia.
12
International Atomic Energy Agency, Power Reactor Information System
(PRIS) Database, (http://www.iaea.org/programmes/a2/); and International Atomic
Energy Agency, Reference Data Series No. 1, Vienna, July 2003.
13
The totals include also Taiwan, China.
38
NTR2004E.book Page 39 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
TABLE II.1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN OPERATION AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE WORLD
(AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2003)
Nuclear Total Operating
Reactors Reactors
Electricity Supplied Experience to
in Operation under Construction
COUNTRY in 2003 Dec. 2003
No of Total No of Total % of
TW·h Years Months
Units MW(e) Units MW(e) Total
ARGENTINA 2 935 1 692 7.03 8.59 50 7
ARMENIA 1 376 1.82 35.48 36 3
BELGIUM 7 5 760 44.61 55.46 191 7
BRAZIL 2 1 901 13.34 3.65 25 3
BULGARIA 4 2 722 16.04 37.71 129 2
CANADA 16 11 323 70.29 12.53 486 11
CHINA 8 5 977 3 2 610 41.59 2.18 39 1
CZECH REPUBLIC 6 3 548 25.87 31.09 74 10
FINLAND 4 2 656 21.82 27.32 99 4
FRANCE 59 63 363 420.70 77.68 1 346 2
GERMANY 18 20 643 157.44 28.10 648 0
HUNGARY 4 1 755 11.01 32.69 74 2
INDIA 14 2 550 8 3 622 16.37 3.30 223 5
IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 2 2 111 0 0
JAPAN 53 44 139 3 3 696 230.80 25.01 1 123 7
KOREA, DEM. PEOPLE’S REP. OF 1 1 040 0 0
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 19 15 850 1 960 123.28 40.01 220 8
LITHUANIA 2 2 370 14.30 79.89 36 6
MEXICO 2 1 310 10.51 5.23 23 11
39
NTR2004E.book Page 40 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
TABLE II.1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS IN OPERATION AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE WORLD
40
(AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2003) (CONT.)
Nuclear Total Operating
Reactors Reactors
Electricity Supplied Experience to
in Operation under Construction
COUNTRY in 2003 Dec. 2003
No of Total No of Total % of
TW·h Years Months
Units MW(e) Units MW(e) Total
NETHERLANDS 1 449 3.80 4.48 59 0
PAKISTAN 2 425 1.81 2.37 35 10
ROMANIA 1 655 1 655 4.54 9.33 7 6
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 30 20 793 3 2 825 138.39 16.54 761 4
SLOVAKIA 6 2 442 2 776 17.86 57.35 100 6
SLOVENIA 1 656 4.96 40.45 22 3
SOUTH AFRICA 2 1 800 12.66 6.05 38 3
SPAIN 9 7 584 59.36 23.64 219 2
SWEDEN 11 9 451 65.50 49.62 311 1
SWITZERLAND 5 3 220 25.93 39.73 143 10
UKRAINE 13 11 207 4 3 800 76.70 45.93 279 10
UNITED KINGDOM 27 12 052 85.31 23.70 1 329 8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 104 98 298 763.74 19.86 2 871 8
Total 439 361 094 31 25 387 2524.03 11 143 5
Within Asia,14 capacity and production are greatest in Japan (53 NPPs in
operation and three under construction) and the Republic of Korea (19 NPPs
in operation and one under construction). Both countries lack indigenous
energy resources, and consequent concerns about supply diversity and security
make new NPPs more economically competitive. In Japan, seven of the
17 reactors shut down in 2002 following revelations by the Tokyo Electric
Power Company of past falsifications in self-imposed reactor inspection reports
had been returned to service by the end of 2003. In China eight NPPs are in
operation, and three more are under construction. India has 14 NPPs in
operation, and eight under construction.
In Western Europe, with the retirement of four units in the UK and one in
Germany, there are now 141 operating reactors. The last new connection to the
grid was France’s Civaux-2 in 1999. With upratings and licence extensions,
overall capacity is likely to remain near existing levels, despite decisions to
phase out nuclear power in Belgium (which passed its phase-out law in
January 2003), Germany and Sweden. In contrast, voters in Switzerland
rejected two referenda in 2003 proposing, in one case, an extended moratorium
on new NPPs and, in the other, a nuclear phase-out. The UK Government
decided it would not yet support the replacement of retiring nuclear plants with
new nuclear capacity, preferring to promote renewables and turn to nuclear
only if these prove insufficient. The most advanced planning for new nuclear
capacity is in Finland where, in 2002, a ‘decision in principle’ to build a fifth
NPP was made by the Government and Parliament. In 2003 the utility
Teollisuuden Voima Oy selected Olkiluoto as the site and signed a contract
with a Framatome ANP – Siemens consortium for a 1600 MW(e) European
pressurized water reactor. The construction licence application for the reactor
was submitted to the Finnish Government in January 2003.
Eastern Europe and the newly independent countries of the former
Soviet Union have 68 operating NPPs and ten more under construction. In the
Russian Federation, which has 30 NPPs in operation and three under
construction, ROSENERGOATOM continued its programme to extend
licences at eleven NPPs. In 2003 the Russian nuclear regulatory body,
Gosatomnadzor, issued a five-year extension for Kola-1.
In Bulgaria a review by the World Association of Nuclear Operators
concluded that Kozloduy-3 and -4 meet all necessary international standards to
continue operating safely. Bulgaria has asked the EU to reconsider an earlier
agreement under which Bulgaria would close Kozloduy-3 and -4 before the end
of 2006 as a condition for joining the EU. In the meantime, Bulgarian
14
Taiwan, China has six NPPs, with two more under construction.
41
NTR2004E.book Page 42 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
regulators issued a new ten-year licence for Kozloduy 4 (through March 2013),
the first long-term licence issued by Bulgaria, and later issued a similar eight-
year extension for Kozloduy-3. In Romania, where licence extensions are
required every two years, an extension was approved for Cernavoda to 2005.
No new NPP has been ordered in the United States of America since
1978, although seven units that were out of service for extended periods have
been restarted since 1998. The focus in 2003 continued to be on licence renewal
and upratings. In 2003, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
approved nine licence extensions of 20 years each (for a total licensed life of
60 years for each NPP), bringing the total number of approved licence
extensions to nineteen by the end of the year. The NRC had 17 applications
currently under review and expected at least eleven more in 2004, and eleven in
2005 and 2006. Also in 2003, the NRC approved eight upratings totaling 401
MW(th). As one step in implementing the ‘Nuclear Power 2010’ programme it
announced in 2002, the US Government streamlined the regulatory process by
introducing early site permits that can be reserved for future use. In the course
of 2003 three companies, Exelon, Dominion Energy and Entergy Nuclear filed
applications for such permits.
In Canada, near-term expansion of nuclear generation is taking the form
of restarting some or all of the eight nuclear units (out of a Canadian total of
22) that have been shut in recent years. The first two such restarts, Pickering
A-4 and Bruce A-4, took place in 2003. Meanwhile, licences for the four
Pickering A units (three of which are still shut down) were extended to 2005,
for the four Pickering B units (all operating) until 2008, and for the four
Darlington units (all operating) until 2008.
In Africa, there are two operating NPPs, both in South Africa. In
Latin America, there are six – two each in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. In
South Africa a further step forward was taken on the Pebble Bed Modular
Reactor (PBMR) in 2003, with the issuance of a positive ‘Record of Decision’
on the environmental impact assessment study for the PBMR demonstration
unit.
42
NTR2004E.book Page 43 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
“The energy produced by breaking down the atom is a very poor kind of
thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformations of
these atoms is talking moonshine.” Lord Ernest Rutherford, 1933.
“It is not too much to expect that our children will enjoy in their homes
[nuclear generated] electrical energy too cheap to meter.” Lewis Strauss,
Chairman, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1954.
In 2004, half a century after electricity produced by nuclear power was
first delivered to an electrical grid at Obninsk in today’s Russian Federation,
we know the truth lies somewhere between the extremes.
Nuclear fission was discovered in 1939, and the world’s first chain
reaction was achieved by the Manhattan Project on 2 December 1942 at the
University of Chicago. The Chicago nuclear pile consisted of uranium
embedded in bricklike blocks of graphite to serve as the moderator. However,
it was not until after the war, on 20 December 1951, that electricity was first
generated from nuclear power. The source was EBR-I (Experimental Breeder
Reactor-I), a fast breeder reactor at the National Reactor Testing Station in
Idaho, USA. EBR-I initially produced about 100 kW(e), enough to power the
equipment in the small reactor building.
A. International Developments
15
This summary borrows heavily, frequently verbatim, from David Fischer’s
History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: the first forty years, IAEA, Vienna,
Austria, 1997.
43
NTR2004E.book Page 44 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
16
World Nuclear Association (http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf54.htm).
44
NTR2004E.book Page 45 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Chicago pile
1950
EBR-1
Nautilus Obninsk (USSR)
Guangdong-1 (China)
Cernavoda-1 (Romania)
2000
360 GW
FIG. III.1. Timeline of first industrial scale NPPs around the world. The white numbers
in the middle of the bar show when total installed nuclear capacity worldwide first passed
100 GW(e), 200 GW(e) and 300 GW(e).17
17
Taiwan, China commissioned Chin Shan-1 in 1977.
45
NTR2004E.book Page 46 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
the idea of ‘turnkey’ plants was introduced in the USA, with a bid for the
construction of a plant at Oyster Creek, New Jersey, at a guaranteed fixed price
that was clearly competitive with coal and oil fired alternatives. By 1967, US
utilities alone had ordered more than 50 power reactors, with an aggregate
capacity larger than that of all orders in the USA for coal and oil fired plants,
and from 1967-1974 they placed an additional 196 orders. The US Atomic
Energy Commission foresaw 1000 nuclear plants on line in the USA by the
year 2000.18 Globally the nuclear industry started to surge up the early slope of
the S-shaped curve of global installed nuclear capacity shown in the left panel
of Figure III.2.
The turnkey plants in the USA successfully attracted utilities to nuclear
power and gained their manufacturers a strong domestic foundation from
which they then expanded internationally. But every turnkey plant lost its
manufacturer money.19 The losses were due only partly to aggressively
competitive low bidding. They also reflected a rapidly changing licensing
environment that increased costs. In this sense the timing of the turnkey plants
could hardly have been worse.
18
Cohn (1997) p. 127
19
Simpson (1995) pp. 192-194
46
NTR2004E.book Page 47 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
GW(e)
200 200
150 WE 150
100 100
50 NA 50
0 0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
FIG. III.2. The left panel shows growth in global installed nuclear capacity in GW(e). The
right panel shows the capacity under construction worldwide, also in GW(e). FSU:
Former Soviet Union; EE: Eastern Europe; NA: North America; Jap: Japan; ROK:
Republic of Korea; WE: Western Europe.
20
Cohn (1997) p. 127
47
NTR2004E.book Page 48 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
48
NTR2004E.book Page 49 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Figure III.3. Rapid capacity growth in the early 1970s pushed up prices, which
in turned encouraged exploration. Greater exploration increased resource
estimates, which, along with the slowdown in growth, gradually depressed
prices.
The changed economic incentives for closing the fuel cycle have limited
the introduction of breeder reactors to the units listed above and to continuing
research and development programmes in France, Japan, Russia, India, the
Republic of Korea and China. They have also limited the need for fuel reproc-
essing. France has two large facilities at La Hague, and the UK and Russian
Federation each have one. Smaller facilities operate in India (three) and
Japan (one).
About one third of the spent fuel discharged from power reactors is
reprocessed; the rest is in interim storage. By the end of 2000, reprocessing had
separated 200 tonnes of plutonium from civilian spent fuel – about 20% of the
total amount of plutonium discharged from civilian reactors. Some of the
recovered plutonium and uranium has been mixed with fresh uranium to create
MOX fuel for LWRs.
Out of the diversity of initial designs, LWRs have gradually come to
dominate the market. In the late 1960s the French authorities abandoned the
gas graphite cycle and turned to LWRs. In the late 1980s, the UK followed suit
120
100
80
$/lb U3O8
60
40
20
0
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
49
NTR2004E.book Page 50 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
with its first order for an LWR. In the meantime the UK had built a number of
advanced gas cooled reactors and had experimented with other designs. As
noted above the USSR built two types of power reactors, both using enriched
uranium fuel. These were LWRs in its WWER series and the graphite
moderated, pressurized water cooled RBMK (reactor bolshoi moshchnosty
kanalny – high power channel reactor). The first industrial scale WWER
reactor, Novovoronezh-1, came on-line in 1964, as did the first industrial scale
water cooled, graphite moderated reactor, Beloyarsky-1. The USSR also
exported WWER light water power reactors.
D. The 1990s
As shown in Figure III.2, trends since 1990 are characterized by slow but
continuing capacity growth, new construction dropping to zero in
North America and Western Europe, and modest continuing construction
elsewhere. Growth in nuclear electricity generation has been somewhat greater
than Figure III.2’s growth in nuclear capacity, as management efficiencies in the
1990s have steadily increased the average availability factors of the world’s
nuclear plants (see Figure III.4).
In the left panel of Figure III.2, the capacity curves for North America,
Western Europe and Russia and Eastern Europe are essentially flat. Two
85
80
percent
75
70
65
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
FIG. III.4. Increases in the average energy availability factor of nuclear power plants
worldwide since 1990.
50
NTR2004E.book Page 51 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
reasons are the 1986 Chernobyl accident and electricity market deregulation in
many countries. Ironically, both these reasons, plus consolidation in the nuclear
industry, also help explain the rising availability factors shown in Figure III.4.
As noted above, there had already been a decade of significant opposition
to nuclear power in Europe. Austria in 1978 had rejected nuclear power in a
general referendum, opposition had stopped Ireland’s attempt at nuclear
development in the late 1970s, and in 1980 Swedish voters approved a
referendum to phase out the country’s twelve (now eleven) operating nuclear
power plants. But Chernobyl broadened the opposition to nuclear power. Italy,
for example, voted in 1987 to shut down all four of its NPPs. Russia’s nuclear
expansion was also stalled.
Another factor was electricity market deregulation in particularly OECD
countries. In the USA deregulation began in 1978 with the requirement that
utilities buy electricity from qualified independent producers, but open access
to transmission networks, competition at the wholesale level, and competition
at the retail level were only introduced in the 1990s. Today about half of US
states have full competition at the retail level. In Europe, deregulation began in
the early 1990s with the Scandinavian countries first liberalizing and then
privatizing the energy industry. In the UK the full process took a decade,
beginning with the UK Electricity Act in 1989 and reaching full deregulation in
1999. The European Union directive to establish common rules for an internal
electricity market was adopted in 1996, with an implementation deadline of
February 1999. Proposed next steps would open the electricity market for all
non-household customers by July 2004, and for all customers by July 2007. In
Japan, initial steps were taken in 1995 with an amendment to the electric
utilities law to allow independent power producers (IPPs) into the wholesale
market.
Deregulation ‘exposed’ excess capacity that had accumulated in
regulated markets, pushed electricity prices (and thus utility revenues) lower
and made power plant investments more risky. No longer could regulators
guarantee rates that would assure cost recovery and profitability. Excess
capacity reduced demand for new capacity – of any sort – and the emphasis on
rapid reliable returns made nuclear power’s ‘front-loaded’ cost structure, with
high initial capital costs and low operating costs, an important disadvantage.
Because nuclear plants are offered in large units (to benefit from economies of
scale), have longer construction times than alternatives, and have organized
opposition to regulatory approval, they present more of an investment risk
than particularly new natural gas fired capacity. These differences, coupled with
low gas prices through most of the 1990s and natural gas’ image as a clean
burning fuel, steered new investments away from nuclear and most often in the
direction of natural gas.
51
NTR2004E.book Page 52 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
But the 1990s were also characterized by the rising availability factors in
Figure III.4. The Chernobyl accident was one motivation. It fostered
information exchange, comparison, emulation of best practice and communi-
cation among operators and regulators facilitated by IAEA, OECD/NEA,
World Association of Nuclear Operators and others. The comprehensive
exchange of information on operational safety experience in particular has
become a major factor in nuclear safety improvements worldwide, and a safer
power plant is generally a more available, and more profitable, power plant. At
the same time deregulating markets meant that increased availability
translated increasingly directly into increased profits. Selected companies
moved to define themselves largely by the size and expertise of their nuclear
operations, leading to consolidation in the industry and more nuclear plants
being operated by those who did it best.
The final characteristic of the 1990s is the shift towards Asia and
developing countries. As discussed in Annex II, current expansion is centred in
Asia. One reason is that new nuclear power plants are most attractive where
energy demand growth is rapid, alternative resources are scarce, energy supply
security is a priority or nuclear power is important for reducing air pollution
and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One or more of these features charac-
terize China, India, Japan and the Republic of Korea, where most current
construction is taking place.
Of the developing countries, India has the longest history while China has
the greatest nuclear capacity. Because India has poor uranium resources but
substantial thorium, its strategy since the beginning (an Atomic Energy
Commission was established as early as 1948) has been aimed at the eventual
use of thorium. The sequence was to start with natural uranium reactors to
produce electricity and plutonium, use the plutonium in fast breeders to breed
more plutonium and uranium-233 from thorium, and then use uranium-233 to
sustain breeders converting thorium to uranium-233.
Nonetheless, India’s first two nuclear units to be connected to the grid, at
Tarapur in 1969, were GE BWRs, offered as turnkey plants. But all twelve units
since have been PHWRs, as are six of eight units under construction. The other
two are WWERs.
China is the most recent developing country to adopt nuclear power, with
its first industrial sized nuclear power plant at Guangdong-1 being connected to
the grid in 1993. Since then it has built an additional six units with four more
under construction. As noted in the main body of this report, the future of
nuclear power may be largely determined by its future in countries like India
and China – countries with large populations, large prospective increases in
GDP and energy demand, established and expanding nuclear expertise, but a
still only minor share of nuclear power in the electricity supply.
52
NTR2004E.book Page 53 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
REFERENCES
[1] Steven Mark Cohn, Too Cheap to Meter: An Economic and Philosophical
Analysis of the Nuclear Dream, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY,
1997.
[2] David Fischer, History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: the first forty
years, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1997.
[3] David Hart, Nuclear Power in India: A Comparative Analysis, George Allan &
Unwin, London, 1983.
[4] Harry Henderson, Nuclear Power, ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2000.
[5] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Department of Nuclear Energy,
Division of Nuclear Power, “Time-line of Nuclear Power in The World”, unpub-
lished, 2002.
[6] Paul R. Josephson, Red Atom, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 2000.
[7] Colin Keay, “A perspective on Nuclear Energy,” referenced in http://www.world-
nuclear.org/opinion/razorfeb02.htm, World Nuclear Association, London,
February 2002.
[8] Rick Michal (2000), “Richard Rhodes on nuclear technology,” Nuclear News, July
2000.
[9] Rick Michal (2001), “Fifty years ago in December: Atomic reactor EBR-I
produced first electricity,” Nuclear News, November 2001.
[10] Judith Perera, Nuclear Power in the Former Soviet Union, Volume 2: Nuclear Fuel
Cycle Facilities, The McCloskey Group Ltd, Petersfield, Hampshire, UK, 2002.
[11] Richard Rhodes, Nuclear Renewal, Viking Penguin, New York, 1993
[12] Richard Rhodes, “Changing perspectives on nuclear energy,” Nuclear News, July
2000.
[13] John W. Simpson, Nuclear Power from Underseas to Outerspace, American
Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, USA, 1995.
[14] Peter Stoler, Decline and Fail, Dodd, Mead & Company, NY, 1985.
[15] Joseph P. Tomain, Nuclear Power Transformation, Indiana University Press,
Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 1987.
[16] Karl Winnacker and Karl Wirtz, Nuclear Energy in Germany, American Nuclear
Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, 1979.
[17] World Nuclear Association (WNA), “Outline History of Nuclear Energy,”
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf54.htm, WNA, London, February 2002.
53
NTR2004E.book Page 54 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
54
NTR2004E.book Page 55 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
LWRs make up 80.5% of all NPPs in operation and are thus a natural
focus for evolutionary design improvements. The principal large evolutionary
designs are the ABWR (advanced boiling water reactor) and the ABWR-II of
Hitachi and Toshiba in Japan and General Electric (GE) in the USA; the
APWR (advanced pressurised water reactor) of Mitsubishi in Japan and
Westinghouse of the USA and the APWR+ of Mitsubishi; the BWR 90+ of
Westinghouse Atom of Sweden; the EPR and the SWR-1000 of Framatome
ANP from France and Germany; the ESBWR of GE; the AP-1000 of Westing-
house in the USA; the WWER-1000 of Atomenergoproject and Gidropress,
Russia; the KSNP+ and the APR-1400 of Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power and
the Korean Nuclear Industry; and the CNP-1000 of the China National Nuclear
Corporation.
The main small and medium-size evolutionary LWR designs are the AP-
600 and the integral IRIS designs of Westinghouse; the WWER-640 of
Atomenergoproject and Gidropress, the PAES-VBER of the Experimental
Design Bureau for Machine Building (OKBM) and the VK-300 of RDIPE, all
from Russia; the HSBWR and HABWR design concepts of Hitachi; and the
NP-300 of Technicatome in France.
Two ABWRs are operating at TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa site, and
ten more are under construction or planned.21 In December 2003, Teollisuuden
Voima Oy (TVO) of Finland signed a turnkey contract with Framatome ANP
and Siemens AG for an EPR for the Olkiluoto site. In the Republic of Korea,
the first KSNP+ units are planned for Shin-Kori-1 and -2 with construction to
start in 2004 and 2005 respectively. Two APR-1400 units are also planned for
Shin-Kori, with construction of the first to start in June 2005. For the AP-1000,
Westinghouse submitted an application to the US NRC in March 2002 for Final
Design Approval and Design Certification. The Final Design Approval is
expected in 2004 and Design Certification is expected in 2004 or 2005. For
IRIS, Westinghouse plans to submit a Design Certification application in 2005,
with the objective of approval by 2008 or 2009. In 2002 the ESBWR design and
technology base were submitted to the US NRC as a first step toward Design
Certification. For Framatome’s SWR-1000, the pre-application phase for
Design Certification by the US NRC started in 2002.
For innovative LWR designs, SMART in the Republic of Korea and
CAREM in Argentina are both integral primary system designs, and both plan
verification and prototype or demonstration plants prior to commercial
21
Two ABWRs are under construction in Taiwan, China.
55
NTR2004E.book Page 56 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Gas cooled reactors – both CO2 cooled Magnox reactors and advanced
gas cooled reactors (AGRs) – dominate nuclear electricity production in the
UK. There is a long history of R&D on high temperature reactors (HTGRs)
with helium as the coolant and graphite as the moderator, and prototype and
demonstration plants using the Rankine steam cycle have also been built and
operated. Distinctive features of HTGRs include the coated particle fuel
56
NTR2004E.book Page 57 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
design, which acts as a barrier against fission product release, and a low power
density, high heat capacity core that increases safety.
There is considerable current effort devoted to gas turbine direct Brayton
cycle helium cooled designs that promise high thermal efficiency and low
generation costs. Eskom, South Africa’s Industrial Development Corporation,
and British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) are jointly developing a pebble bed small
modular HTR (PBMR) system. Also, the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy,
OKBM, General Atomics, Framatome and Fuji Electric are jointly developing
a small gas turbine modular helium reactor (GT-MHR). This is designed for
electricity production using weapons grade plutonium.
The high temperatures made possible by the inert helium coolant and
coated fuel particles are well above those possible in water cooled reactors, and
have prompted research for a number of high temperature heat applications
such as hydrogen production. HTGRs also have potential for low temperature
heat applications such as seawater desalination by providing steam produced
by the waste heat. Currently two helium cooled test reactors are in operation,
the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) at JAERI in Japan
and the HTR-10 at the Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology (INET) in
China. A helium cooled very high temperature reactor (VHTR) is being
developed within the framework of GIF with a focus on hydrogen production.
Similar independent efforts are ongoing in Russia with the Minatom’s OKBM
taking a lead.
D. Fast Reactors
57
NTR2004E.book Page 58 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
58
NTR2004E.book Page 59 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
international effort to jointly define the future of nuclear energy research and
development. Members of GIF are Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Japan,
the Republic of Korea, South Africa, Switzerland, the UK, the USA and
Euratom. The IAEA and the OECD/NEA have permanent observer status in
the GIF Policy Group, which governs the project’s overall framework and
policies.
The objective as stated in the GIF charter is “the development of
concepts for one or more Generation IV nuclear energy systems that can be
licensed, constructed, and operated in a manner that will provide a competi-
tively priced and reliable supply of energy to the country where such systems
are deployed, while satisfactorily addressing nuclear safety, waste, proliferation
and public perception concerns”. GIF began with an evaluation of an extensive,
wide ranging collection of concepts. In 2002, the GIF Policy Group selected six
of these for future bilateral and multilateral cooperation, and defined a
‘technology roadmap’ to help prepare and guide subsequent research and
development. The six selected systems are:
The IAEA’s INPRO has as its main objectives, first, helping to ensure
that nuclear energy is available to contribute to fulfilling energy needs in the
21st century in a sustainable manner and, second, bringing together technology
holders and technology users to consider jointly the international and national
actions required to achieve desired innovations in nuclear reactors and fuel
cycles. As of September 2003, members of INPRO included Argentina, Brazil,
Bulgaria, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, the Republic of
Korea, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the
Netherlands, Turkey and the European Commission.
In its first phase, INPRO outlined the prospects and potential of nuclear
power and prepared guidelines for evaluating innovative concepts for both
nuclear reactors and fuel cycles. These guidelines include ‘user requirements’
for innovative nuclear energy systems, covering the areas of economics,
sustainability and environment, safety, waste management, and proliferation
resistance. They also outline a method (the ‘INPRO methodology’) for
applying INPRO user requirements to specific designs and concepts. In
addition, INPRO has produced recommendations on cross-cutting
59
NTR2004E.book Page 60 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
F. Fusion
60
NTR2004E.book Page 61 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
61
NTR2004E.book Page 62 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
A. Introduction
Many tremendous and exciting advances are taking place within the
biological field, facilitated by numerous biotechnological developments and
applications. These have enabled scientists to approach old problems in new
and innovative ways as well as allowing them to find unique solutions for
various biological, medical, and agricultural needs. The developments have
already started to make an impact on society. These technological advances
have led to the increased sensitivity and specificity of test assays, the miniaturi-
sation of instrumentation and development of point-of-care devices. This has
strengthened and encouraged the development of a strong knowledge base on
the ground. An example is ‘35S/32P phospho-imaging gene sequencing’ (a
technique that uses isotopes to produce rapid and sensitive images), which is
now considered a cost effective and implementable technology in several
developing countries. In addition, generic molecular and related isotopic
techniques such as southern blots, northern blots, two-dimensional electro-
phoresis, DNA macro- and micro-arrays and others are equally applicable to
the medical and agricultural fields.
B. Isotopic Methods
62
NTR2004E.book Page 63 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
C. Genomics
The term ‘genomics’ was coined some 20 years ago to define the study of
genes and their functions. It followed the development of various technologies
and instrumentation required to determine the nucleotide sequences of entire
genomes, during the late 70s and early 80s. The DNA sequence is often referred
to as the ‘blueprint of life’ and the impact of its elucidation over the last few
decades has been compared to that of the discovery of the periodic table in
chemistry. Initially, sequence determination was limited to the simplest
organisms such as viruses possessing not more than 16 genes. In 1990, the most
ambitious scientific endeavour in the history of life sciences was launched, viz.
the sequencing of the full human genome thought to contain about 100 000
genes. This enormous task was completed in 2000 at a cost of $3 billion. The full
genome sequences of the rat, mouse and some pathogenic micro-organisms are
now also available and similar studies on a variety of other organisms such as
cattle, chickens, sheep, goats and pigs are in progress.
Following the successful sequencing of the human genome there has been
a flurry of activity, mainly by multinational biotechnology companies, to
identify and patent genes with possible applications in human medicine and
agriculture. This reflects the growing awareness among scientists and investors
of the enormous potential within this field, both for further scientific
discoveries as well as future financial profits.
D. Molecular Diagnostics
63
NTR2004E.book Page 64 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
E. Medical Applications
F. Livestock Applications
64
NTR2004E.book Page 65 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
be detected in five days by screening for just three codons directly from
sputum, as opposed to conventional methods that can take eight weeks.
The identification of genes responsible for natural resistance to diseases
could lead not only to an improvement in agricultural resource management,
but also in the selective breeding and cloning of resistant animals and plants,
thereby enhancing or replacing conventional methods of disease control. One
of the most important trends with an added market potential is termed
molecular breeding, i.e. the application of genomics to the breeding of animals
and plants with desired genetic traits. The natural resistance to specific diseases,
found in individual animals or local breeds can be used to develop resistant
breeds for example. Several genes and traits have already been identified and
sequenced and can be used for this purpose. It has been shown, for example,
that the incidence of resistance to brucellosis in a cattle herd can be raised
within one generation from 18% to almost 53.6% by breeding with parents that
tested positive for the ‘brucella resistance gene’. Total resistance may not be
achievable, but partial resistance would enhance effective disease
management. Another area of potentially important significance is an
improvement in the utilization of low-grade forage by ruminants through the
transfer of specific genes to ruminal bacteria, which could have important
agricultural and economic impacts in certain marginal areas.
G. Biochips
65
NTR2004E.book Page 66 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
H. Biopharmaceuticals
66
NTR2004E.book Page 67 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
K. Vaccines
67
NTR2004E.book Page 68 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
L. Gene Therapy
68
NTR2004E.book Page 69 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
A. Introduction
B. Radioisotopes
69
NTR2004E.book Page 70 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
70
NTR2004E.book Page 71 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
71
NTR2004E.book Page 72 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
72
NTR2004E.book Page 73 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
TABLE VI.1.
USA JAPAN
73
NTR2004E.book Page 74 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
74
NTR2004E.book Page 75 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Radioisotopes (3H, 82Br, 99m Tc, 140La, 24Na, 131I) are applied as
radiotracers in industry and the environment. Oil fields and refineries, chemical
and metallurgical industries and wastewater purification installations are the
particular users.
Radioisotope techniques (radiotracers, gamma scanning, tomography
and single particle tracking) are extensively used to identify and quantify
multiphase reactors (phase hold-up distributions, velocity and mixing
patterns). Multiphase reactor technology is the basis for petroleum refining,
synthesis gas conversion to fuels and chemicals, bulk commodity chemicals
production, manufacture of special chemicals and polymers, and the conversion
of undesired products into recyclable materials. Quantification of the reactor
performance requires a description of: (i) kinetics on a molecular scale; (ii) the
effect of transport on kinetics on a single eddy or single catalyst particle scale;
and (iii) the phase distribution, flow pattern and mixing in the reactor on the
reactor scale. It is critical to understand and predict at what rates each reactant
can be supplied to the micro scale and how changes in reactor size or operating
conditions affect these rates of supply. While progress has been made in under-
standing fundamental reaction mechanisms and in computing from first
principles the effect of mass transfer on the reaction rate locally, the description
of the reactor scale flow pattern and mixing is in general primitive and rests on
the assumption of ideal flow patterns. Radioisotope techniques help optimizing
multiphase reactors saving hundreds of million of US dollars annually
worldwide.
Information gained from interwell use of tracers in oil fields is indispen-
sable for the evaluation and optimization of oil field performance. It is possible
to make qualitative or semi-quantitative evaluations, as was the case of a
reservoir in Colombia, which is naturally heavily compartmentalized.
Information about fluid flow across faults, and therefore the effect of water
injection could only be studied by the use of tracers. Several wells were
uniquely labelled, and the exercise showed that there was an unexpectedly
good communication across a fault that originally was a suspected barrier.
75
NTR2004E.book Page 76 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
76
NTR2004E.book Page 77 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
REFERENCES
77
NTR2004E.book Page 78 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
A. Introduction
Seventy percent of the planet is covered with water, but only 2.5% of that
is freshwater. Nearly 70% of this freshwater is frozen in the icecaps of
Antarctica and Greenland. Most of the rest is in the form of soil moisture or in
deep inaccessible aquifers (Helmer, 1997), or comes in the form of monsoons
and floods that are difficult to contain and exploit. Less than 0.08% of the
world’s water is thus readily accessible for direct human use, and even that is
very unevenly distributed.
Currently about 2.3 billion people live in water-stressed areas and among
them 1.7 billion live in water-scarce areas, where the water availability per
person is less than 1000 m3/year. Statistics show that by 2025 the number of
people suffering from water stress or scarcity could swell to 3.5 billion, with
2.4 billion expected to live in water-scarce regions. Water scarcity is a global
issue, and every year new countries are affected by growing water problems.
Better water conservation, water management, pollution control and
water reclamation are all part of the solution to projected water stress, as are
new sources of fresh water, including the desalination of seawater. Desali-
nation technologies have been well established since the mid-20th century and
widely deployed in the Middle East and North Africa. The contracted capacity
of desalination plants has increased steadily since 1965 and is now about
FIG. VII.1. Cumulative worldwide desalination capacity. The top line shows total
operating and contracted capacity. The bottom line shows just operating capacity.
78
NTR2004E.book Page 79 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
79
NTR2004E.book Page 80 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
Start of
Power, Water
Loca- power Desal.
Country Unit name Phase MWe Capacity,
tion opera- Process
net m3/day
tion
The High Temperature Gas cooled Reactor (HTGR) design, one of the
leading reactor concepts currently under consideration for future nuclear
power plant deployment, is one of the candidate reactor designs well suited for
such process heat applications. Traditionally emphasis has been on HTGR
suitability for high temperature applications such as hydrogen production, but
its potential for low temperature applications such as nuclear desalination is
attracting interest with the provision of virtually cost-free waste heat at the
cycle sink boundary, and at the desired range of temperatures (100-120 ºC)
needed for desalination. Since a good proportion of the total production cost of
seawater desalination - in the range of 30% to 50% - is attributed to energy
cost, the potential exists for a significant reduction in the cost of freshwater
production using an HTGR in co-generation mode, boosting thermal
utilization efficiency and promising a safe, clean and economically competitive
heat source.
80
NTR2004E.book Page 81 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
C. Current Developments
● Argentina has identified a site for its small reactor (CAREM), which
could be used for desalination. Depending on financing, construction
could begin in the near future.
● Canada has embarked on a three-year project to validate its innovative
reverse osmosis (RO) system design concepts.
● China is proceeding with several conceptual designs of nuclear desali-
nation for coastal Chinese cities.
81
NTR2004E.book Page 82 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
82
NTR2004E.book Page 83 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
D. Economics
83
NTR2004E.book Page 84 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
REFERENCES
[1] Gowin et al. (1999), Nuclear Seawater Desalination - IAEA Activities and
Economic Evaluation, IDA World Congress, San Diego, USA; Desalination
Economic Evaluation Program (DEEP) – User’s Manual Series No. 14, 2000.
[2] Helmer (1997), Water Demand and Supply, International Symposium on Seawater
Desalination with Nuclear Energy, Taejon, Republic of Korea
[3] IAEA (1990), Use of Nuclear Reactors for Seawater Desalination, IAEA-
TECDOC-574, 1990.
[4] IAEA (1992), Technical and Economic Evaluation of Potable Water Production
through Desalination of Seawater by Using Nuclear Energy and Other Means,
IAEA-TECDOC-666, 1992.
[5] IAEA (1996a), Options Identification Programme for Demonstration of Nuclear
Desalination, IAEA-TECDOC-898, 1996.
[6] IAEA (1996b), Potential for Nuclear Desalination as a Source of Low Cost
Potable Water in North Africa, IAEA-TECDOC-917, 1996.
[7] IAEA (1997a), Methodology for the Economic Evaluation of Cogeneration/
Desalination Options: A User’s Manual, IAEA Computer Manual Series No. 12,
1997.
[8] IAEA (1997b), Thermodynamic and Economic Evaluation of Co-production
Plants for Electricity and Potable Water, IAEA-TECDOC-942, 1997.
[9] IAEA (1998), Nuclear heat applications: Design aspects and operating experi-
ence, IAEA-TECDOC-1056, 1998.
[10] IAEA (2000), Introduction of nuclear desalination: a Guidebook, IAEA-
Technical Report Series No. 400, 2000.
[11] IAEA (2002), Design concepts of nuclear desalination plants, IAEA TECDOC-
1326, 2002.
[12] Wangnick, K. (2002), IDA Worldwide Desalting Plants Inventory Report No.17,
Wangnick Consulting GmbH and the International Desalination Association
(IDA), Vienna, July, 2002.
[13] World Water Council (2000), The World Water Vision, the Second World Water
Forum, The Hague, The Netherlands.
[14] World Water Forum (2000), “World Water Vision Commission Report: A Water
Secure World,” World Water Forum, The Hague, Netherlands, 17-22 March 2000.
[15] World Water Forum (2000), “World Water Vision, Making Water Everybody’s
Business,” World Water Forum, The Hague, Netherlands, 17–22 March 2000.
84
NTR2004E.book Page 85 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
A. Abstract
B. Introduction
85
NTR2004E.book Page 86 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
86
NTR2004E.book Page 87 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
D. Energy
22
Tamikazu Kume, Etsuo Amano, Tomoko M. Nakanishi, and Mitsuo Chino,
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 10, pp. 1106-1113, October 2002
87
NTR2004E.book Page 88 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
23
Chadwick M.J. et al., Comparative Environmental and Health Effects of
Different Energy Systems for Electricity Generation. Key Issues Paper 3, Senior Expert
Symposium on Electricity and the Environment. Helsinki, 91-141, 1991
24
R.E. Evenson and D. Gollin, Science, Vol. 300, No. 5620, pp. 758-762, 2 May
2003.
88
NTR2004E.book Page 89 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
25
M. Hossain, D. Gollin, V. Canabilla, E. Cabrera, N. Johnson, G.S. Khush, and G.
Mclaren, International Research and Genetic Improvement in Rice: Evidence from
Asia and Latin America, in R. E. Evenson and D. Gollin (eds) (2003) Crop Variety
Improvement and Its Effect on Productivity, CABI Publishing, Wallingford UK.
26
Tamikazu Kume, Etsuo Amano, Tomoko M. Nakanishi, and Mitsuo Chino,
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 10, pp 1106-1113 (October
2002).
89
NTR2004E.book Page 90 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
advantage of varieties of cattle with high yields of milk and meat. The number
of farmers who do so has risen significantly since 1999, as has milk production
and farm output. The Agency has recently initiated a research and
development program at its Seibersdorf laboratories to develop SIT for the
control of malaria through area-wide suppression of mosquitoes. Considerable
progress in rearing methods and gender selection are needed before field trials
planned for the northern state of Sudan and French Reunion Island can be
initiated.
Food irradiation has the potential to replace chemical fumigation to
prevent spreading of pests in international trade and is increasingly used to
secure the microbiological safety of foods such as ground meat or spices. In the
United States, for example, 5% of ground beef is irradiated from a total market
of 4 billion kg. Food irradiation has been declared safe by the FAO/
WHO Codex Alimentarius, but public acceptance varies considerably from
country to country.
F. Health
1000000000
100000000 Medical x-rays
FIG. VIII.1. Rates of nuclear medicine procedures (relative) from most developed
(category I) to least developed countries (category IV) - UNSCEAR 2000.
90
NTR2004E.book Page 91 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
G. Water
Today there are more than one billion people who lack access to a steady
supply of clean water. The Millennium Declaration resolved by 2015 to “halve
the proportion of people who are unable to reach or afford safe drinking
water” and to stop the unsustainable exploitation of groundwater. This
translates into more than 300 000 additional people being provided with this
basic human need every day from now to 2015. Nuclear techniques in isotope
hydrology play an important role in addressing this problem. Water samples
have specific isotopic fingerprints that can tell age, origin and climatic
conditions, and nuclear techniques have become a basic tool to understand and
manage water resources in a sustainable way. Water supplies are already scarce
and will become more precious due to increasing demand from development.
Agriculture is by far the biggest consumer, consuming 70% of all water
withdrawals from rivers, lakes, and aquifers.27 In Bangladesh, isotope studies
have led to a new understanding of the water resources available and also
contributed as well to the understanding of how arsenic enters the water table.
At a cost of about $50 000, these studies have helped shape how a much larger
investment in excess of $50 million is to be spent. They will have a large impact
27
Water for People, Water for Life, UN World Water Development Report (2003),
p. 193.
91
NTR2004E.book Page 92 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
because tens of millions of people have been poisoned by arsenic in the present
ground water supply system and need to find a sustainable alternative. Other
methods could have been used, although they could not have provided as good
an understanding of complex water systems. The value added from the isotope
studies is complex because the outcomes in the field have yet to be realized, but
it is certain that nuclear techniques have improved understanding of the
region’s hydrology and so provided value to the people of Bangladesh.
H. Industry
I. Frameworks
28
See Beneficial Uses and Production of Isotopes, NEA, 1998, and its 2000
Update.
29
IAEA’s Nuclear Technology Review 2002.
92
NTR2004E.book Page 93 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
in water resources and nutrition, as well as biomedical tests and improved crop
varieties are important examples. Cost benefit analyses in these areas need to
recognize that different, non-nuclear infrastructures are required to apply such
sophisticated techniques on an area-wide basis and, if necessary, to conform to
the specialized international requirements, for example, in food distribution.
As public awareness grows of the potential national, regional and global
impacts of nuclear and non-nuclear methods for the production and distri-
bution of food and energy, increasing attention to the socio-economic benefit
aspects will need to be paid to those particular areas where nuclear sciences
and applications can provide cost effective and low-risk alternatives.
J. Perspectives
93
NTR2004E.book Page 94 Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:44 PM
94
04-2791NuclTechRev.qxd 13/08/2004 11:22 Page 1
NUCLEAR