Review of Related Literature: Coping Mechanisms
Review of Related Literature: Coping Mechanisms
There are many different causes of stress among individuals involving university
students. Academic stress is part of being a student and can influence the coping schemes of
students with regards to the needs and demands of academic life (Essilfie and Kwaah, 2017).
According to Februanti, Galugu, Kadir, Pajarianto, and Sari (2020), academic stress usually
stems from how students perceive the allotted time given to them to absorb and master the
information in the records provided by their teachers. Citing Pariat, Rynjah, Joplin and Kharjana
(2014), Dhanapal and Ramachandiran (2018) articulate that several challenges encountered
regularly by college students have the likelihood to increase their stress levels that can affect
their health and obstruct their academic functioning if not managed. It may also have an effect on
the physical, emotional, and behavioral aspects of the students (Februanti, Galugu, Kadir,
Pajarianto, and Sari, 2020). In the study of Eysenbach, Fagherazzi, and Torous (2020), results
showed that majority of the participants had a hard time concentrating on school tasks due to
several sources of interference and the transition from physical classes to online learning which
raised their concern on their academic performance. In addition, more than half of the
respondents exhibited their concerns on the financial stability of their families, additional
Coping Mechanisms
In the study of Kim and Park (2018), they identified four stress-coping themes as tactical
qualities for coping against academic stress: (1) creating coping strategies in a physically active
manner (e.g. jogging and sports activities); (2) creating coping strategies in an inactive/positive
manner (e.g. essay writing, music therapy, and internet surfing); (3) utilizing maladaptive coping
mechanisms (e.g. excessive internet gaming and socially deviant behaviors); and, (4) relying
upon religious belief and spiritual power (e.g. bible studies and prayer). Research results also
suggest that a stressful and demanding situation associated with academic stress may provide
new opportunities and strengthen the individuals’ inner capacities, as well as to lead to a higher
possibility of emotional and psychological problems (Kim and Park, 2018). On the other hand,
Esiah-Donkoh (20) disclosed two coping strategies that were conclusively used by the
indicate that students prefer problem-focused strategies in managing their stress on academics. In
the present time, some students have developed their own coping mechanisms to combat various
stressors entailed by the shift in educational learning, and these mechanisms may be in the form
Theoretical Framework
Theoretical support for this research comes from the transactional model of stress and
coping developed by Lazarus and Folkman (1987). This theory presents stress as an outcome of a
transaction between the individual and complex environment he/she resides. As a phenomenon,
coping is said to include both cognitive and behavioral responses that are commonly used by
people in an effort to deal with internal and/or external stressors that goes beyond their personal
aptitudes or resources as explained in this theory. Moreover, Walinga (2014) mentioned in her
study the book of Lazarus entitled Psychological Stress and Coping Process (1966), where he
incorporated previous studies related to stress, health, and coping and placed an individual’s
assessment of a stressor at the core of the whole stress experience. It denotes that in a sense, how
a person copes with or act in response to the stressor will be determined by how he/she will
determine whether a person has adequate resources that can effectively deal with the demands
posed by a stressor (Folkman and Lazarus, 1988; Lazarus and Folkman, 1987, as cited in
Walinga, 2014). Additionally, the review literature describes the coping experience in connection
with problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, which are also noted as active and
passive coping styles. Berjot and Gillet (2011) asserted in the same way that coping is a
behavioral response adapted by a person to avoid the harmful consequences of stress and anxiety