The document discusses three main topics related to forecasting: steps in the forecasting process, forecast accuracy, and approaches to forecasting. It describes the six basic steps to follow in any forecasting process. It also explains that forecast accuracy is important, but errors will always exist due to random variation and complex real-world variables. Forecasting can use qualitative methods based on subjective inputs or quantitative methods that analyze objective historical data or develop models using explanatory variables.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views
Chapter 3 Part 3
The document discusses three main topics related to forecasting: steps in the forecasting process, forecast accuracy, and approaches to forecasting. It describes the six basic steps to follow in any forecasting process. It also explains that forecast accuracy is important, but errors will always exist due to random variation and complex real-world variables. Forecasting can use qualitative methods based on subjective inputs or quantitative methods that analyze objective historical data or develop models using explanatory variables.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Chapter 3 part 3
The following topics included steps in forecasting, forecast accuracy and approaches to forecasting. These 3 topics are very essential when it comes to knowing the demand for the accuracy and effectivity of results
STEPS IN THE FORECASTING PROCESS
There are six basic steps in the forecasting process: 1. Determine the purpose of the forecast. How will it be used and when will it be needed? This step will provide an indication of the level of detail required in the forecast, the amount of resources (personnel, computer time, dollars) that can be justified, and the level of accuracy necessary. 2. Establish a time horizon. The forecast must indicate a time interval, keeping in mind that accuracy decreases as the time horizon increases. 3. Obtain, clean, and analyze appropriate data. Obtaining the data can involve significant effort. Once obtained, the data may need to be “cleaned” to get rid of outliers and obviously incorrect data before analysis. 4. Select a forecasting technique. 5. Make the forecast. 6. Monitor the forecast. A forecast has to be monitored to determine whether it is performing in a satisfactory manner. If it is not, reexamine the method, assumptions, validity of data, and so on; modify as needed; and prepare a revised forecast. Note too that additional action may be necessary. For example, if demand was much less than the forecast, an action such as a price reduction or a promotion may be needed. Conversely, if demand was much more than predicted, increased output may be advantageous. That may involve working overtime, outsourcing, or taking other measures. FORECAST ACCURACY Accuracy and control of forecasts is a vital aspect of forecasting, so forecasters want to minimize forecast errors. However, the complex nature of most real-world variables makes it almost impossible to correctly predict future values of those variables on a regular basis. Moreover, because random variation is always present, there will always be some residual error, even if all other factors have been accounted for. Consequently, it is important to include an indication of the extent to which the forecast might deviate from the value of the variable that actually occurs. This will provide the forecast user with a better perspective on how far off a forecast might be. Decision makers will want to include accuracy as a factor when choosing among different techniques, along with cost. Accurate forecasts are necessary for the success of daily activities of every business organization. Forecasts are the basis for an organization’s schedules, and unless the forecasts are accurate, schedules will be generated that may provide for too few or too many resources, too little or too much output, the wrong output, or the wrong timing of output, all of which can lead to additional costs, dissatisfied customers, and headaches for managers. Some forecasting applications involve a series of forecasts (e.g., weekly revenues), whereas others involve a single forecast that will be used for a one-time decision (e.g., the size of a power plant). When making periodic forecasts, it is important to monitor forecast errors to determine if the errors are within reasonable bounds. If they are not, it will be necessary to take corrective action.
In some instances, historical error performance is secondary to the ability of a forecast to
respond to changes in data patterns. Choice among alternative methods would then focus on the cost of not responding quickly to a change relative to the cost of responding to changes that are not really there (i.e., random fluctuations). Overall, the operations manager must settle on the relative importance of historical performance versus responsiveness and whether to use MAD, MSE, or MAPE to measure historical performance. MAD is the easiest to compute, but weights errors linearly. MSE squares errors, thereby giving more weight to larger errors, which typically cause more problems. MAPE should be used when there is a need to put errors in perspective. For example, an error of 10 in a forecast of 15 is huge. Conversely, an error of 10 in a forecast of 10,000 is insignificant. Hence, to put large errors in perspective, MAPE would be used. APPROACHES TO FORECASTING There are two general approaches to forecasting: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative methods consist mainly of subjective inputs, which often defy precise numerical description. Quantitative methods involve either the projection of historical data or the development of associative models that attempt to utilize causal (explanatory) variables to make a forecast. Qualitative techniques permit inclusion of soft information (e.g., human factors, personal opinions, hunches) in the forecasting process. Those factors are often omitted or downplayed when quantitative techniques are used because they are difficult or impossible to quantify. Quantitative techniques consist mainly of analyzing objective, or hard, data. They usually avoid personal biases that sometimes contaminate qualitative methods. In practice, either approach or a combination of both approaches might be used to develop a forecast. The following pages present a variety of forecasting techniques that are classified as judgmental, time-series, or associative. Judgmental forecasts rely on analysis of subjective inputs obtained from various sources, such as consumer surveys, the sales staff, managers and executives, and panels of experts. Quite frequently, these sources provide insights that are not otherwise available. Time-series forecasts simply attempt to project past experience into the future. These techniques use historical data with the assumption that the future will be like the past. Some models merely attempt to smooth out random variations in historical data; others attempt to identify specific patterns in the data and project or extrapolate those patterns into the future, without trying to identify causes of the patterns. Associative models use equations that consist of one or more explanatory variables that can be used to predict demand. For example, demand for paint might be related to variables such as the price per gallon and the amount spent on advertising, as well as to specific characteristics of the paint (e.g., drying time, ease of cleanup). QUALITATIVE FORECASTS In some situations, forecasters rely solely on judgment and opinion to make forecasts. If management must have a forecast quickly, there may not be enough time to gather and analyze quantitative data. At other times, especially when political and economic conditions are changing, available data may be obsolete and more up-to-date information might not yet be available. Similarly, the introduction of new products and the redesign of existing products or packaging suffer from the absence of historical data that would be useful in forecasting. In such instances, forecasts are based on executive opinions, consumer surveys, opinions of the sales staff, and opinions of experts.