Chargaff DNA Data Graphing
Chargaff DNA Data Graphing
Introduction – DNA was first discovered in 1869, but not much was known about the molecule until the 1920s. Early
researchers discovered that DNA was comprised of repeated units called nucleotides. Each nucleotide contains a part
called a nitrogenous base. There are four different nitrogenous bases found in DNA: adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine
(G), and thymine (T).
In the 1920s it was believed that these nitrogenous bases occurred in all living things in the same repeated pattern, such
as ATGC ATGC ATGC. If this were true, then DNA could not be the genetic material. With the same repeated pattern in
all species, DNA could not provide the variety needed for a molecule containing the genetic code.
After World War II, the biochemist Erwin Chargaff made some major discoveries about the nitrogenous bases in DNA.
His research revealed the percentage of each base (A, T, G, and C) found in an organism’s DNA. Table 1 below includes
some of Chargaff’s data and some more recent additions.
A T G C A T G C A T G C
Yeast Wheat Human
2. What observations can you make about the data in Table 1? What patterns do you notice?
3. What does the data in Table 1 show about the make-up of DNA for different species?
4. How does this support the idea that DNA could be the genetic material? Explain.
Purines & Pyrimidines – As shown below, adenine and guanine are similarly shaped nitrogenous bases called
purines. Thymine and cytosine are similar in shape and they are classified as pyrimidines.
1. For five different organisms in Table 1 (on the front), calculate the ratio of purines to pyrimidines.
2. What can you conclude about the Purine : Pyrimidine ratio of DNA for all organisms?
Piecing it Together - Chargaff’s data was a central piece of evidence used by James Watson and Francis Crick
in 1953 to successfully describe the structure of DNA. Look at the drawing of DNA below.
1. What do you notice about the arrangement of the nitrogen bases? Record as many
observations as you can.
2. How did Chargaff’s data help Watson & Crick predict that DNA looks like this?