Thompson Indictment
Thompson Indictment
COUNT ONE
of Illinois who held himself out as experienced in matters including real estate financing.
1913 and located in Chicago, Illinois. Beginning in 1989, the deposits of Washington Federal were
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Washington Federal provided mortgage
loans which were documented by a note promising repayment and a mortgage giving the bank a
secured by an interest in real estate and whose activities affected interstate commerce.
solicited and received a $110,000 loan from Washington Federal in the form of a check payable to
a law firm as defendant THOMPSON’s capital contribution, in return for which defendant
THOMPSON executed a note promising to repay these funds to Washington Federal, but did not
provide security for his repayment of the funds (the “$110,000 loan”).
e. In or around February 2012, after defendant PATRICK D. THOMPSON
had made one payment to Washington Federal on the $110,000 loan, defendant THOMPSON
stopped making payments, and Washington Federal did not require defendant THOMPSON to
solicited and received $20,000 from Washington Federal, which defendant THOMPSON used to
pay past due taxes to the Internal Revenue Service, and Washington Federal did not require
defendant THOMPSON to execute a note promising to repay this $20,000 or to provide security
solicited and received $89,000 from Washington Federal, which defendant THOMPSON used to
pay off a lien held by another financial institution on a property owned by defendant THOMPSON,
and Washington Federal did not require defendant THOMPSON to execute a note promising to
repay this $89,000 or to provide security for his repayment of these funds.
defendant PATRICK D. THOMPSON did not make any payments to Washington Federal.
borrower, with a copy to be sent to the IRS, which reported mortgage interest payments received
by the financial institution from the borrower during the calendar year.
1098 which falsely represented that Washington Federal had received mortgage interest payments
2
k. In or around December 2017, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
determined that Washington Federal was insolvent and that it had at least approximately $66
million in nonperforming loans. On or about December 15, 2017, the OCC closed Washington
Federal and the FDIC, as a receiver, succeeded to all of Washington Federal’s interests. The FDIC
provided approximately $90 million to make account holders whole to the extent allowed by law
and proceeded to attempt, directly and through other financial institutions acting as its agent,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON, who had received money from Washington Federal and had not
Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, knowingly made a false statement to Financial Institution A, acting as the agent
of the FDIC, for the purpose of influencing the actions of the FDIC and Financial Institution A in
collecting money owed by defendant THOMPSON to the FDIC as the successor in interest to
Washington Federal, in that defendant THOMPSON falsely stated he only owed $100,000 or
$110,000 to Washington Federal and that any higher amount was incorrect, when defendant then
3
COUNT TWO
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, knowingly made a false statement to the FDIC, for the purpose of influencing
the action of the FDIC in collecting money owed by defendant THOMPSON to the FDIC as the
successor in interest to Washington Federal, in that defendant THOMPSON falsely stated that he
only owed $110,000 to Washington Federal, that any higher amount was incorrect, and that these
funds were for home improvement, when defendant then knew he had received $219,000 from
Washington Federal and the $110,000 was paid to a law firm as defendant’s capital contribution;
4
COUNT THREE
1. Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), 1(d) through 1(f), and 1(h) through 1(j) of Count One are re-
alleged here.
A of a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040 with schedules and attachments) for certain
interest payments made by a taxpayer on a home mortgage loan when the loan was secured by a
3. On or about April 14, 2014, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040
with schedules and attachments), for the calendar year 2013, which return was verified by written
declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that
mortgage interest, when defendant knew he did not pay mortgage interest in the amount reported
on the return;
5
b. On Form 1040, line 43, that defendant’s taxable income was $356,951,
when defendant knew his taxable income was in excess of the amount reported on the return;
6
COUNT FOUR
1. Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), and 1(d) through 1(j) of Count One and paragraph 2 of Count
2. On or about October 14, 2015, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040
with schedules and attachments), for the calendar year 2014, which return was verified by written
declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that
mortgage interest, when defendant knew he did not pay mortgage interest in the amount reported
on the return;
b. On Form 1040, line 43, that defendant’s taxable income was $454,753,
when defendant knew his taxable income was in excess of the amount reported on the return;
7
COUNT FIVE
1. Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), and 1(d) through 1(j) of Count One and paragraph 2 of Count
2. On or about April 18, 2016, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040
with schedules and attachments), for the calendar year 2015, which return was verified by written
declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that
mortgage interest, when defendant knew he did not pay mortgage interest in the amount reported
on the return;
b. On Form 1040, line 43, that defendant’s taxable income was $1,802,518,
when defendant knew his taxable income was in excess of the amount reported on the return;
8
COUNT SIX
1. Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), and 1(d) through 1(j) of Count One and paragraph 2 of Count
2. On or about April 12, 2017, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040
with schedules and attachments), for the calendar year 2016, which return was verified by written
declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that
mortgage interest, when defendant knew he did not pay mortgage interest in the amount reported
on the return;
b. On Form 1040, line 43, that defendant’s taxable income was $166,994,
when defendant knew his taxable income was in excess of the amount reported on the return;
9
COUNT SEVEN
1. Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), and 1(d) through 1(k) of Count One and paragraph 2 of Count
2. On or about October 15, 2018, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division,
PATRICK D. THOMPSON,
defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040
with schedules and attachments), for the calendar year 2017, which return was verified by written
declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue
Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that
mortgage interest, when defendant knew he did not pay mortgage interest in the amount reported
on the return;
b. On Form 1040, line 43, that defendant’s taxable income was $429,165,
when defendant knew his taxable income was in excess of the amount reported on the return;
A TRUE BILL:
__________________________________
FOREPERSON
______________________________
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
10