0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views

Assignment 3 PT FA19 CHE 083

1. The student was asked to calculate the theoretical power requirements for a Blake standard jaw crusher processing quartz. 2. Screen analysis was provided for the feed and product. Using Kick's law, the student calculated the average diameter for the feed as 668.02mm and the product as 190.135mm. 3. The student then used these average diameters along with specifications for the crusher like RPM, feed rate, and open/closed side settings to calculate the theoretical power requirement according to Kick's law. The calculated power requirements range from 243.288kw to 245.334kw.

Uploaded by

Maryam Fatima
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views

Assignment 3 PT FA19 CHE 083

1. The student was asked to calculate the theoretical power requirements for a Blake standard jaw crusher processing quartz. 2. Screen analysis was provided for the feed and product. Using Kick's law, the student calculated the average diameter for the feed as 668.02mm and the product as 190.135mm. 3. The student then used these average diameters along with specifications for the crusher like RPM, feed rate, and open/closed side settings to calculate the theoretical power requirement according to Kick's law. The calculated power requirements range from 243.288kw to 245.334kw.

Uploaded by

Maryam Fatima
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Up COMSATS UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD, LAHORE

CAMPUS

MARYAM FATIMA
FA19-CHE-083 A
ASSIGNMENT NO: 3
PARTICULATE TECHNOLOGY
SUBMITED TO: DR FARUKH JAMIL
QUESTION 1:
A batch crusher is run at constant power input. It was found that 30 minutes of operation
were necessary to reduce the average particle size from 100 mm to 10 mm. how long would
it take to reduce the particle size to 5 mm? Examine the discrepancies that are associated
with the application of the different mathematical to predict power or, alternatively, the
time required to achieve certain fineness.

BY BONDS LAW:
1 1
w=k ( − )
√ D pp √ D pf
1 1
P×t=k ( − )
√ D pp √ D pf

Here t=30 Dpp=10 Dpf=100 t=? When Dpp=5 and Dpf=100

p ×30=k ¿) ------------------------- equation 1


1 1
p ×t=k ( − ) -----------------------------equation 2
√5 √ 100

Divide both equations


30 0.2163
=
t 0.347
t = 48.17 min

BY RITTINGERS LAW:
1 1
W = k( − )
D sb D sa
1 1
p ×t= k( − )
D sb D sa
Here t=30 Dsb=10 Dsa=100 t=? When Dsb=5 and Dsa=100

p ×t= k (1/10-1/100) --------------------- equation 1


p ×t= k (1/5-1/100) ------------------------equation 2

Divide both equations


p ×30/ p ×t=k (0.09)/k (0.19)
t = 63.33 min

BY KICKS LAW:
W= k ln (Dsa/Dsb)
p ×t = k ln (Dsa/Dsb)

Here t=30 Dsb=10 Dsa=100 t=? When Dsb=5 and Dsa=100

p ×30 = k ln (100/10) ------------------------equation 1


p ×t = k ln (100/5) ----------------------------equation 2

Divide both equations


p ×30/ p ×t=k ln (10)/k ln (20)
t = 39.03 min
QUESTION 2:
Quartz from the mine is sent over a grissly with 8-inch spacing and then to a Blake
standard jaw crusher with a 40 inch. By.42 inch feed opening and a 6- inch discharge
setting. The crusher operates at 190 rpm and handles 130 tons/hr. of feed. Screen analysis
of the feed and product are given below. What are the theoretical power requirements?

SOLUTION:
Dpb =6inch =152.4mm
Dpa =42inch = 1066.8mm
Dpa= 40inch =1016mm
m =130tons/hr
es =190rpm
Feed:
Screen Aperture, in. Mass Fraction Dpi(mm)
-34 +28.6 0.181
-28.6 +24.0 0.343 668.02
-24.0 +20.3 0.220 562.61
-20.3 +17.0 0.165 473.71
-17.0 +14.3 0.054 397.51
-14.3 +12.0 0.037 334.01
xi 0.343 0.220 0.165 0.054 0.037
∑ =0.181+ + + + +
Dpi 668.02 562.61 473.71 397.51 334.01
= 0.182499
6 6
φ= × 0.18249 φ= × 0.182499
8× 2.32 8× 2.32
6 xi
A= ∑
φρ Dpi
=0.05889

Product:
Screen Aperture, in. Mass Fraction Dpi(mm)
-6 +4.23 0.123
-4.23 +2.99 0.248 91.694
-2.99 +2.11 0.167 64.77
-2.11 +1.49 0.105 45.72
-1.49 +1.05 0.068 32.258
-1.05 +0.081 0.051 23.622
-0.81 +0.57 0.046 17.526
-0.57 +0.403 0.039 12.3571
-0.403 +0.285 0.033 8.7376
-0.285 +0.201 0.028 6.1722
-0.201 +0.142 0.025 4.3561
-0.142 +0.100 0.023 3.0734
-0.100 +0.0707 0.018 2.16789
-0.0707 +0.0500 0.016 1.53289
-0.0500 +0.0353 0.010 1.08331


xi 0.248 0.167 0.105 0.068 0.051 0.046 0.039 0.033 0.028 0.025 0.023
=0.123+ + + + + + + + + + + +
Dpi 91.694 64.77 45.72 32.258 23.622 17.526 12.3571 8.7376 6.1722 4.3561 3.0734
=0.190135
6 6 xi
φ= × 0.19.135 A= ∑
8× 2.32 φρ Dpi
=0.061466
6 es 1 1
Kr = [−
ηc ηm ρ φ φ ]
6 ×190 1 1
= [ −
2.32 0.05899 0.061466 ]
=335.54
P 1 1
m
=Kr [−
Dpb Dpa ]
1 1
P = 130×335.54 [ −
152.4 1016 ]
= 243.288kw

1 1
P =130×335.54 [ −
152.4 1066.8 ]
= 245.334kw

You might also like