We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
PAST DISCUSSION: Termination by Employer
According to Article 282 of the Labor Code, an employer can terminate an
employee for just causes, which could be any of the following:
serious misconduct or willful disobedience by the employee of the
lawful orders of his employer or representative in connection with his work; gross and habitual neglect by the employee of his duties; fraud or willful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his employer or duly authorized representatives; commission of a crime or offense by the employee against the person of his employer or any immediate member of his family or his duly authorized representatives; and other similar causes.
CLOSURE OF ESTABLISHMENT AND REDUCTION OF PERSONNEL
Authorized causes for termination ARTICLE 297 (ART. 283) NOTE: Should be done in GOOD FAITH (abuse of discretion, arbitrariness, or maliciousness on the part of management)
Employers can also terminate an employee based on authorized causes like
business and health reasons.
Art. 283 of the Labor Code states that an employee can be terminated due to business reasons such as:
installation of labor-saving devices;
redundancy; retrenchment (reduction of costs) to prevent losses; or the closing or cessation of operation.
Art. 283. Closure of establishment and reduction of personnel. The
employer may also terminate the employment of any employee due to the installation of labor-saving devices, redundancy, retrenchment to prevent losses or the closing or cessation of operation of the establishment or undertaking unless the closing is for the purpose of circumventing the provisions of this Title, by serving a written notice on the workers and the Ministry of Labor and Employment at least one (1) month before the intended date thereof. In case of termination due to the installation of labor-saving devices or redundancy, the worker affected thereby shall be entitled to a separation pay equivalent to at least his one (1) month pay or to at least one (1) month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. In case of retrenchment to prevent losses and in cases of closures or cessation of operations of establishment or undertaking not due to serious business losses or financial reverses, the separation pay shall be equivalent to one (1) month pay or at least one-half (1/2) month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. A fraction of at least six (6) months shall be considered one (1) whole year.
Brief of Amici Curiae of Don Howard Williams, JR., and Owners' Counsel of America Jin Support of Petitioners, Jarreau v. S. LaFourche Levee Dist., No. 17-163 (Sep. 21, 2017)