Non-Probability Sampling 1. Incidental or Accidental Sapling
This document discusses different types of non-probability sampling methods. It describes incidental or accidental sampling as taking samples of people who are readily available without using a proper sampling method. Judgement sampling selects groups based on available information assuming they represent the population. Purposive sampling deliberately picks samples based on criteria relevant to the study. Quota sampling selects samples until a predetermined number is reached based on categories. Snowball sampling uses a network to identify additional people to include in the sample by asking initial participants. The document provides strengths and limitations for each sampling method.
Non-Probability Sampling 1. Incidental or Accidental Sapling
This document discusses different types of non-probability sampling methods. It describes incidental or accidental sampling as taking samples of people who are readily available without using a proper sampling method. Judgement sampling selects groups based on available information assuming they represent the population. Purposive sampling deliberately picks samples based on criteria relevant to the study. Quota sampling selects samples until a predetermined number is reached based on categories. Snowball sampling uses a network to identify additional people to include in the sample by asking initial participants. The document provides strengths and limitations for each sampling method.
Samples are taken because they are available at the time of data gathering. There researcher is resorting into this kind of sampling because they cannot employ more acceptable sampling methods that is why they just get the person readily available for the study. Strengths: o Easy method of a sampling o Used mostly in behavioral science o Economical method Limitations: o Do not represent the total population o Parametric measures cannot be used 2. Judgement Sampling Selection of a group from the population on the basis of available information assuming as if they are representative of the entire population. The group may also be selected on the basis of intuition or on the basis of the criterion deemed to be self-evident. Investigator should take the judgement sample so this sampling is highly risky. Strengths: o Knowledge of the investigator can be best uses in this technique. o Economical Limitations: o Involves uncontrolled variables o Generalization is not possible 3. Purposive Sampling Selected by some arbitrary method because it is knows to be representative of the total population or it is known that it will produce a well matched group. The sample is pick out of the population by mean or a criteria to be selected by the researcher which is very important for the particular study. This is appropriate when stressing the importance of the specific variables among the control. Strengths: o Use the best available knowledge concerning the sample subjects o Better control of significant variables. o Sample groups data can be easily matched. o Homogeneity of subjects used in the sample. Limitations: o Reliability of the criterion is questionable. o Knowledge of population is essential. o Errors in classifying sampling subjects. o Inability to utilize the inferential parametric statistics. o Inability to make generalization concerning total population. 4. Quota Sampling The sample is selected on the basis of judgement of the researcher which falls to the category decided until it will attain the number of respondents (quota). Strengths: o Easy kind of sampling o Frequently used in social survey Limitations: o Not a representative of the population o Influenced by regional, geographical and social factors. 5. Snowball Sampling A technique of selecting a sample using a network. Few individual from the group are selected and the information required for them is collected. They are then ask to identify other people in the group to become part of the sample.