REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

DON HONORIO VENTURA STATE

UNIVERSITY

BACOLOR, PAMPANGA

A THESIS PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO

THE FACULTY OF COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

PROPOSED DESIGN OF SOLAR POWERED SETTLEMENT UNIT USING

CONTAINER VANS

BY:

BARING, MARK JOHN O. ,Jr.

CONCEPCION, LIAN JOY L.

DAVID, TRISHA MAE C.

GALAN, MICHAEL RAY P.

MALIT, ALLEN N.

RODRIGUEZ, JOHN REX M.

SANTOS ARVIN JON M.

GAGUI, DANNIEL S. (Leader)

ENGR. RAUL O. DUYA

THESIS ADVISER

March 2020
 Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND
STUDIES

1.1 Introduction
“Do not look the other way, do not hesitate. Recognize that the world is
hungry for actions, not words. Act with courage and vision,” Nelson Mandela said.”
A heroic man with an advocacy seen to be a beacon of hope to billions or millions of
people suffering because of poverty. As we all know, poverty is a dilemma that
cannot be resolved at once. This difficult state caused about 1.6 billion, more than 20
percent of the world’s population, have inadequate housing.

The population of our country’s indigenous people is unknown, but it is

estimated that it is between 10% and 20% of the country's population. Now, our
vision is to help these indigenous people, specifically the Aetas, to find peace and
comfort for once in their lives. They have their current shelters to live in but in a risky
and dangerous environment. This courageous thesis topic we chose will provide
permanent settlement for the Aetas instead of living in the forests or mountains.

The first focal point of our project is to alleviate some of the Aeta’s concerns
in their everyday lives. It is estimated that there are about 20,000 to 30,000 Aeta
people living in the Philippines. They are an ethnic group who are nomadic and who
build temporary shelters. They are inhabiting the central and southern Zambales
mountains in Zambales, Pampanga, and Bataan provinces of the Philippines. In spite
of their situation, the Philippine government affords them little or no protection. Due
to poverty and lack of education, their lives are not normal as compared to those
people living below the mountains. We want to contribute in the Aetas’ community
by giving them something to remember for the rest of their lives and those are
protection and safety.

We humbly introduce to you our proposal, “Proposed Design of Solar

Powered Settlement Unit Using Container Vans.” This topic was inspired by the
project from Australia named as “Sleep Bus.” Basically in this project, individual
buses were used as housing units for the homeless. On the other hand, our research
study will make use of container vans to construct a two-story building. We will
utilize container vans as the main rooms for the building. Also, the distinctive feature
in our building is that it will be run by solar panels.

The second focal point of our project is to build a unique, sustainable and
economical structure. Firstly, who would have thought building a two-story structure
made up of container vans and the electricity will be run by solar panels? We aspire
something extraordinary and it has never been done before. Secondly, we want to
construct a building that will last for a lifetime. A building will be established firmly
in the ground to withstand any daily occurrence. Lastly, our project will be in
comparison with a reinforced concrete two-story building. We aim that our project
will be a lot cheaper than the usual. A one of a kind project that anyone would want to
incorporate into.

Our thesis proposal will be beneficial to the residents of barangay Diaz, Porac
. Based on the internet, Porac has a hilly to mountainous terrain in the majority of its
plains. There are many native people living near and on top of the mountains. Their
lives are at risk living in such locations. It will be dangerous to sleep there during bad
atmospheric conditions in terms of temperature, precipitation, wind and humidity and
other natural disasters. It is essential for them to have a rigid housing to live in which
can withstand all sorts of emergencies.

Mr. Nelson Mandela became an eye opener for us not to look the other way
but rather to focus on what are the major problems in our very own country. Who
else will hesitate to help our fellow citizens who are dealing with poverty? Only the
ignorant will. We are hopeful that our proposal will be an inspiration to other
researchers when the day comes. This will be an official initial action to eventually
help in reality if this will be successfully proposed. “Life’s most persistent and urgent
question is, what are you doing for others?”, Martin Luther King, Jr. said.

1.2 Review of Related Literature

In this day and age, authorities in modern design such as Architectural Digest
have come to recognize the potential that solar powered homes have for exuding
elegant levels of structural home design. With the varying ranges of solar panel prices
in the Philippines, it would be a great aesthetic upgrade for your home to make the
switch to solar power.
High-temperature areas (like the Philippines) are ideal locations for solar
porches; the shade provided through solar filtered daylight makes for a dreamy view
of the skies accompanied with a protective performance. Solar skylight and solar
shade are greatly utilized with see-through modifications integrated on exterior
planes.
However, a common concern about spaces like these is the roofing since it is
not part of the main structure; meaning, the area is not under the main roof.
One great way to make use of the airspace is by installing a small roofing
system with solar panels.
This technique is more advisable for homeowners, who do not want to conduct
a large-scale installation.
 Different homes have varying porch sizes. While porches may have a
significantly smaller floor area compared to the main body of the house, the floor
space it occupies is sufficient enough for solar panels to be installed on top.
Imperial Homes launches solar-powered development. While there is a current
real estate boom in the country, with more Filipinos being able to purchase high-rise
homes through easier financing processes, there is still a housing backlog of about 4
million units.
The underserved sector is in affordable housing, where experts predict a deficit
that could reach 6.5 million units in 2030 if this is not addressed. Even if families
have access to government interventions such as the Pag-ibig Housing Loan, there are
not enough developers who are focused on delivering quality affordable homes.
The living room of Via Verde units are small but comfortable. One such developer
that has risen to the challenge is the Imperial Homes Group, with its CEO Emma
Imperial developing innovative ways to house the Filipino family. One of its first
innovations was the inclusion of 500 to 1,000 solar watt panels in its Via Verde
project in Sto. Tomas, Batangas, giving residents access to renewable energy and
therefore significantly decreasing their electricity bills. “You will be pleasantly
surprised to find so many units with air-conditioning in a low-cost housing project,”
Imperial says. “Our residents happily report that their electricity bills go down to as
low as P11 to P30 in a month!”. Because of this landmark achievement in socialized
housing, the company was recognized by the Financial Times and International
Finance Corporation (IFC) for transformational business for its Achievement in Low-
Carbon Urban Transformation in May 2016.
House for shelter that is made with Container Van which cost for about
60,000-70,000 each. The difference of this home for shelter is having a solar panel
and a low-cost budget for a building. It is low cost budget because the solar panel will
only power a bulb and maybe a electric fan. It doesn’t have any kitchen not like other
house.
 The purpose of this study is a permanent home address or an apartment. Most
Location of the House for shelter here in Philippines were in a Landmark of a city.
The Location of this Home for shelter with solar panel should be in Porac.
We will use container for about 14ft in length, each container consists of
kitchen, and bedroom just a simple room. At the middle of the building, and a park at
the center of it. Container is a lot cheaper than a concrete building will indicate later
at studies.
In terms of solar panel, the whole building has a power source good for a whole
building.
A light bulb, fan and some minimal appliances with low power voltage

1.3 Statement of the Problem

This study attempts to design a structure made of container vans with a
concrete foundation and used as small sleeping units powered by solar panels used as
energy source. This study intends to provide a stronger, safer structure to the Aetas
meant to be their permanent living quarters. This study will serve as a prevention to
any occurrences that will ruin their current living area. This study also intends to
compare the cost and efficiency of the structure rather than a full reinforced concrete
building as well as the efficiency of using Solar panels rather than the standard power
connections we use.

1.4Objectives of the Study

General Objectives:

● Design and provide a resettlement area for the Indigenous people in Porac

Specific Objectives:

● Design a permanent shelter made up of used container vans with solar

powered electricity.
● Make a cost analysis of Solar powered units.
 ● Make a comparative cost analysis between the proposed Solar Powered
Settlement Unit using Container Vans and Reinforced Concrete Settlement
Unit.

1.5 Significance of the Study

Our country is famous for camaraderie, and for this research we are planning
to give homes for the Indigenous people in Porac, Pampanga. The Aeta are an
indigenous people who live in scattered, isolated mountainous parts of the island of
Luzon, the Philippines. Pampanga was left in ruins following the 6.1-magnitude
earthquake last April 22 and it led Aeta community in ruins. Most of the permanent
structures made of cement and hollow blocks were toppled or became unstable,
forcing the community of around 700 families to evacuate. This is an example on how
our fellow Aetas need a better place and home to live at. We want to provide them a
safe and reliable community that they can live, and to help them we plan on making a
resettlement area for the Aeta’s.

The houses on the resettlement area that we are planning to build is made up
of container vans and will be supplied by electricity using Solar Energy panels. Solar
energy is the technology used to harness the sun's energy and make it useable, we’re
planning to use this tool on providing free energy consumption for the Community.
We need to step up on helping them for we are the ones who are capable of doing
this. We are a nation that is united and by doing this kind of research is just a small
portion on how to provide for them a better living.

1.6 Scope and Limitation

● This is a sample Resettlement area for the Aetas that will be proposed to the
Government.
● Containers Vans will serve as the house structure.

● Solar powered panels will sustain the Electricity for the area.
 ● The consumption of energy that will be used up to vary the type of Solar Panel
that we’re going to use.
● Common dug outs for the water resource will be provided.

● The funds for this project will come from LGU’s of The Municipality of Porac
and Provincial Capitol of Pampanga .
● Other necessities of Aeta’s such as food, clothes and daily resource will not be
covered by this study.

● Because of the insufficient records of the Municipality of Porac, we weren’t

able to acquire the Soil Bearing Capacity and test the Soil sample of the Site.

1.7 Conceptual Framework

Researchers gathered data from municipal hall about all the

information about the indigenous people there.

Site visit conducted for the planning of the structure.

Searched and visited the distributors of materials such as

container van and solar panel.

Preparation of the Design and Plans of the structure.

Estimated the total quantity of materials to be used and its

cost.

1.8 Definition of Terms

Container Van - a vehicle that is used for delivering heavy objects.

Electricity - is where a electric current flows through a device which we often use
with our appliances to work.

Power - needed to turn on a mechanical or electrical device.

Solar Panel - is where a device convert solar energy to electrical energy.

Solar Powered Settlement - is where a House built in with a (solar panel) to supply
electrical use.

Voltage - Electric potential or potential difference expressed in volts.

 Chapter 2

METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research

2.1.1 Research Setting

The initially proposed study will take place at Brgy. Diaz, Porac. The town is
said to have a fairly large Aeta Community living around the mountains. The town’s
terrain is known for being mountainous. The main shelter of The Aetas are built near
around forest and mountains. The focus of our study is to provide a proper place for
The Aetas to live in. The chosen location has an empty spacious lot. It is a perfect fit
to build our two-story building. The location is accessible for the native residents
since it is near to their current temporary settlements.

2.1.2 Data Gathering

The team visited the Porac Municipal Hall to conduct research about the
number of indigenous people in their municipality. We established the said project on
the location where the majority of Indigenous people located. Then, we visited this
chosen location to put up the project in Brgy. Diaz, Porac, Pampanga.

For this project, we used solar panels as a natural source of electricity. We

searched and scouted our province, Pampanga, to find the best and most affordable
solar panels available in the market. We chose “Trina Solar Technology” since it is a
shop that specializes in solar powered technologies that is located in Mong Tang
Ave., Balibago, Angeles, Pampanga. They offer a wide range of services and offers
different kinds of solar powered technologies such as panels, inverters and many
more. They also cater different types of services such as installation, maintenance and
inquiries about the said topic. The researchers conducted interviews and did
computations about the average electric consumptions to conclude what type of solar
panels to be used in the structure.

Container van is the main material needed for this project. This material is
really hard to find here in Pampanga but me we managed to find a companies who
specialized in making container vans suited for more than just shipment of goods .”U-
PHIL INC.” located at Unit 301, The Orient Square Building, F. Ortigas Center, Pasig
City and “BBSY TRAIDING” located at 2042 Maria Clara St. Cor. Sisa St. Sampaloc
Manila they specialized in making 40ft HC Reefer, 40ft DC and High Cubes and 20ft
DC Containers for housing purposes.

2.2 Design of Structure

2.2.1 DESIGN OF SOLAR POWERED SETTLEMENT UNIT USING

CONTAINERVANS

a. Design of stairs
 Determine the Wll and Wdl.
 Get the specific thread and riser
 Get the total W (Wa=Wstep+ Wslab + Wdl)
 Get the factored W (Wu = 1.2Wdl + 1.6WLL)

a.1. Steel Bars

 Determine the He h and d.
 Get Hu. {Hu = 1/8 (Wu)(Lc)2}
 Get min = 1.4/fy
 Get max
 a.2. Main Bars
 Get the area of the steel (As = bd)
 Determine the that will use.
 Get the spacing for rebars.

a.3. Temperature Bars

 Get the area of the steel (As = bd)
 Determine the that will use.
 Get the spacing.

b. Design of the Stair Slab

 Determine if one way or two way slab.
 Get the thickness of the slab.
 Check for liveload reduction
 Determine the moment coefficient
 Determine the specific case for the moment coefficient
 Get the maximum moment.

b.1. Short Span

 Middle Strip Mu = 1.2CaDLWDLLa2 + 1.6CaLLWLLLa2
 Continuous Edge Mu = -CaWULa2
 Discontinuous Edge Mu = -1/3 (Mu)

b.2.Long span
 Middle Strip Mu = 1.2CbDLWDLLb2 + 1.6CbLLWLLLb2
 Continuous Edge Mu = -CbWULb2
 Discontinuous Edge Mu = - 1/3 (Mu)
 Get = 1.4/fy
 Use chart to get all the , As, Ab, Spacing of each end of the span
c. Design of Concrete Frame
 Get the weight of container ban
 Get the weight of slab, stairs, and deadloads
 Determine the total weight
 Get the T. T = Ct (hn)3/4
 Get the V = CuL/Rt (w)
 Get the Cu, Wu, I, R base on the nearest active fault
 Get the Vmim. Vmin = 1.62NuL/R (N)
 Get the Vmax = 2.56L/R (w)
 Determine Fx = (V – ft)Wxhx/EWh

d. Design of Beam
 Determine the total weight
 Get the value of Mu
 Get the Rn {Mu = Rnbd2}
 Get the specific dimension
 Get the total weight of the beam
 Get the area of steel As = bd
 Get the no. of steel bars
 Check for flexure
 Determine the value of Vu, 0.5VC, Vc, 3Vc, 5Vc
 Get the spacing

e. Design of Column
 Determine the diameter of rebars
 Get the Area Gross Pu = 0.8Ag{0.5f’c = g (fy – 0,85f’c)}
 Get the dimension of the column
  Determine the Area Steel
 Get the number of rebars needed
 Check steel percentage
 Get the Spacing for lateral ties

f. Design of the Footing

 Determine the value of M, Pu, qa
 Determine the unit weight of soil and concrete
 Get the depth of the footing
 Get the effective soil bearing capacity (qe)
 Get qmax = /bd + 6M/bd2
 Get qmin = Pu/bl – 6Mu/bL2
 Assume depth of footing
 Get Vu using punching shear method
 Get the effective depth
 Get the area Steel
 Get the number of rebars required

g. Design of Footing Stumps

g.1. Design of Wide Flange Section

 Get the Cc to determine what type of steel to use.

 Determine the Fa.

g.2. Base Plate Design

 Determine the B x N
 Get the Fp
 Fp = 0.35f’c

 Do Unity Check.
 Determine the thickness of the Base Plate.
 Determine the dimension of the anchor bolts to be used.

g.3. Pedestal design

 Determine the Pu.

 Determine the dimensions by assuming
 Get the number of steel bars by using the formula Ast = gAg
 Check Steel Percentage
 Get the lateral Ties

g.4. Design of Footing

 Determine Pu.
 Get the L and D.
 Determine the qe.
 Determine the qu.
 Use punching shear to determine the effective depth.
 Get Vu, 0.5VC, Vc, 3Vc, 5Vc
 Determine the number of steel bars.

h. Design of Comfort Rooms

h.1 Design of Purlins

 Determine the Roof and Live Load to be used.
 Assume spacing of Purlins.
 P = 0.0000473
  Get Pn, Pn=
 Compute the Weights and recompute for their components
 Get Mx and My
 Get Trial Section
 Check the section


h.2 Design of Roof Beams

 Determine the total weight

 Get the value of Mu
 Get the Rn {Mu = Rnbd2}
 Get the specific dimension
 Get the total weight of the beam
 Get the area of steel As = bd
 Get the no. of steel bars
 Check for flexure
 Determine the value of Vu, 0.5VC, Vc, 3Vc, 5Vc
 Get the spacing

h.3 Design of Columns

 Determine the diameter of rebars

 Get the Area Gross Pu = 0.8Ag{0.5f’c = g (fy – 0,85f’c)}
 Get the dimension of the column
 Determine the Area Steel
 Get the number of rebars needed
 Check steel percentage
 Get the Spacing for lateral ties
h.4 Design of Footing

 Determine the value of M, Pu, qa

 Determine the unit weight of soil and concrete
 Get the depth of the footing
 Get the effective soil bearing capacity (qe)
 Get qmax = /bd + 6M/bd2
 Get qmin = Pu/bl – 6Mu/bL2
 Assume depth of footing
 Get Vu using punching shear method
 Get the effective depth
 Get the area Steel
 Get the number of rebars required

h.5 Design of Wall Footings

 Determine the value of M, Pu, qa

 Determine the unit weight of soil and concrete
 Get the depth of the footing
 Get the effective soil bearing capacity (qe)
 Get qmax = /bd + 6M/bd2
 Get qmin = Pu/bl – 6Mu/bL2
 Assume depth of footing
 Get Vu using punching shear method
 Get the effective depth
 Get the area Steel
 Get the spacing of main bars considering 1m Strip
 Get the number of horizontal bars
 Chapter 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

3.1 Design of Container Van Settlement

The researchers designed a “Two- Storey Resettlement Unit.” This unit is

made from container vans instead of usual concrete material. It has a z-shaped form
that gave it an aesthetical look. It includes stairs that is supported by a slab on the
second floor. A one-storey public toilet and bath reinforced concrete building
designed separately from the resettlement unit. Both resettlement unit and public
toilet and bath building are powered by solar panels for their electricity.
3.1.1 Design of Structure
3.1.2 Site Plan

3.1.2.1 Site Development Plan

3.1.2.2 Elevations
3.1.2.3 Floor Plans
3.1.3 Design of Stairs

3.1.3.1 Stairs:
Fy= 275 MPa

WLL = 4.8 KPa

WDL = 1.53 KPa

f’c = 27.5 MPa

tread= 300 mm

riser= 175 mm

Lc = 4800 mm

hmin == 240 mm ≈ 250 mm

WDL= WSTEP + WSLAB + WDL

WSTEP = (0.175) (23.54)

= 2.060 KPa

WSLAB =

= 6.807 KPa
WDL= 2.060 + 6.807 + 1.53

= 10.397 KPa

Wu = 1.2 ( 10.397) + 1.6 (4.8)

= 20.156 KPa

STEEL BARS:

1m Strip

h= 250 mm

d=250 – (20 + )

d=224 mm

Mu = (20.156) (4.8)2

Mu = 58.049 kn-m

= = 0.00509

= =0.0048

= ()(

0.0271

Compute:

Mu = 58.049

b= 1000

d= 224

f’c= 27.5 MPa

58.049 = 0.9( 1000)(224)2 (

Use

A. Main Bars

As= 0.0048 (1000)(224)

= 1075.2

Using 12mm :

S= 105.19 mm < 3h

3h = 750 mm

Use S= 100 mm

B. Temperature Bars

Ast = 0.0018 (1000)(250)

Ast = 450 mm2

Using 10 mm:

S= 174.53 ≈ 150 mm

3.1.3.2 Stair Slab:

Solution:

a. Span Ratio
 M=

b. Thickness of Slab

t= =

t= 22 mm ≈ 100 mm

c. Determine Super- Imposed Loads

WDL=(23.54)(0.1)(1)=

WDL= 2.354

Check for reduction of LL

Ai = 1(1) = 1 m2 < 37.5 ; LL not reduced

WLL = 4.8 (1)

WLL = 4.8

Wu = 1.2 (2.354) + 1.(4.8)

Wu = 10.50

d. Moment Coefficient (Case 7)

CaDL = 0.027

CbDL= 0.033

CaLL = 0.032

CbLL = 0.035

-Ca = 1.0
-Cb = 0.071

e. Maximum Moment

e.1) Short Span

e.1.1) Middle Strip

Mu = 1.2 CaDL WDL La2 + 1.6 CaLL WLL La2

= 1.2 (0.027)( 2.354)(1)2 + 1.6 (0.032)(4.8)(1)2

Mu = 0.322 kn-m

e.1.2) Column Strip

* Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Ca Wu La2

= -1.0 (10.50) (1)2

= -10.50 kn – m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- =

=-

= 0.107 kn-m

e.2) Long Span

e.2.1) Middle Strip

Mu+ = 1.2 CbDL WDL Lb2 + 1.6 CbLL WLL Lb2

= 1.2 (0.033) (2.354) (1)2 + 1.6 (0.035) (4.8) (1)2

Mu+ = 0.362 kn-m

e.2.2) Column Strip

*Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Cb Wu Lb2

= -0.071 (10.50)(1)2

Mu- = -0.746 kn-m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- = -

= -0.121 kn-m

Mu = bd2 (

= 0.00509

f. Short Span

d= 74 mm

Long Span

d=62 mm

Directio Short Span Long Span

n
Location Continuou Middle Discontinuou Continuou Middle Discontinuou
s s s s
Mu (kn- 10.50 0.322 0.107 0.746 0.362 0.121
m)
 0.00814 0.0050 0.00509 0.00509 0.0050 0.00509
9 9
As 602.36 376.66 376.66 315.58 315.58 315.58
(mm2)
Ab ( 12 36 36 36 36 36 36
mm)
Spacing 187.76 mm 300.26 300.26 mm 358.38 mm 358.38 358.38 mm
(mm) mm mm

3.1.4 Design of Concrete Frame

3.1.4.1 Seismic Analysis

CV= Container Vans

WCV = 2420 kg (9.81) (

= 23.7402 KN
Two Container Vans:

WCV = ( 23.7402 )2

= 47.4804 KN

Slab of Stairs:

WS= 10.50 (1 m )

= 10.50 KN

Two WS

WS = 10.50 X 2

= 21 KN

WT= WCV + WS

= 47.48 + 21

WT = 68.48 KN

T= Ct (hn)3/4

Ct= 0.0488

T = 0.0488 (2.99)3/4

T = 0.110 sec. ; Flexible Structure

V=
Nearest Active Fault 33.4 km, Iba Fault, Type A

Cv= 0.64 Nv

Nv= 1.0

I= 1.0

R= 2.9

V = (68.48) = 136.15 KN

V min = 0.56 Ca l W

Ca = 0.44 Na ; Na= 1.0

Vmin = 0.56 (0.44) (1) (68.48)

V min = 16.87 KN

Vmin = =

Z= 0.4

= (68.46)

Vmin = 15.11 KN
Vmax =

Vmax = 25.98 KN

Use

Fx =

T < 0.7

0.1110 < 0.7 ; Ft = 0

F=

F= 25.98 KN

3.1.4.2 Design of Beam

a. Dimensions

Stairs = 4.8 KPa + 1.53 KPa

= 6.33 KPa

∑ MR1= 0

R1 (4.88 ) - (4.88) – 10.5(1) (4.88 + ) + 10.5 (0.5) = 0

R1 = kN

R2 = 20kN

b. with Self Weight

Mu= 6.34 KN-M

Mu=
 Rn = 9.03

6.34 = 0.9 (9.03)(200)(d2)

d= 93.488 300

200 x 300

W = 23.54 (0.2)(0.3)

= 1.4124

Wt = 1.4124 + 3.894 = 5.3064

c. Steel Bars

Mu =

15.796 = 0.9 (1-

As = 0.0053 (200)(250)

= 263.45

N=

= 1.31

d. Flexure:

Mu Cap =

a= = = 47.31

Mu Cap = 0.90 (a) ()(16)2 (220)(250 – = 45.02 ; SAFE

: 200mm x 300 mm Beam

 e. Wu = 5.3064

Ru = 24.86kN

d = 250 mm

Vu = 23.53

 REGION II

 Sx = 532.41mm

Sx =

 Use S = 125 mm

3.1.4.3 Design of Column

10.5 + 1. 4129 = 11.9126

R1 = R2 = = 24.86kN

SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:
 a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
24860 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = = 1682.93 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  1682.93
b = 41.02  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 1682.93 )
Ast = 33.66
n = Astab
n = 33.66/ 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.17  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL :
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES:
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.1.4.3 Design of Footing

C1F1 = 24.86 +23.54 (2.99)(0.3)(0.3)=

= 31.1996 KN

M= 25.98 (4.49)
M = 116.65 KN-m

Pu = 31.1946 KN

qa= 120 KPa

Fy = 275 MPa

f’c=27.5 MPa

= 23.54

Depth of Footing = 1.5 m

Use 16mm

Colum Size = 300 x 300 mm

Solution:

a. Effective Soil Bearing Capacity :

 qe= 120-23.54 (0.2) – 17 (1.5 – 0.2)
qe= 93.19 KPa
b. For Combined Axial Load & Bending
qmax= +
qmax= qe
120 =
bd= 2.55 m2
b x d = 1.6 m x 1.6 m
d= L ; L= 1.6 m
c. P=Pu ; M = Mu
qumax= +
= +
qumax= 183.06 KPa
qumin=
= -
qumin= 158.69 KPa
Assume Depth of Footing = 250 mm
d= b-1.5 – 75
= 250 – 1.5 (16) – 75
d= 151 mm
d. Checking for “d”
Av

qc= 173.16 KPa

Vu=
=
Vu = 142.20 KN
 Vc = (151)
Vc = 179 .49 KN

e. Mu= qc (a)(B) ( + ( (a)(=

Mu = 173.16 (0.65) (1.6)() + (

Mu = 59.92 KN- m

Mu =

59.92 x106 = 0.9 (Rn)(1000)(150)2

Rn= 1.82

= 0.00509

As =

As = 1607.04 mm2

n= = 8.29

: 1.6m x 1.6 m x 200mm with 9pcs-16mm bars bothways

3.1.4.1 Schedule of Beam, Column, and Footing

Beam No. Length Dimensions Main Bars Spacing of

(16mm) Stirrups
(10mm)
B1 1 6.88m 0.2 m x 0.3m 4 0.125m
Column No. Length Dimensions Main Bars Spacing of
 (16mm) Lateral Ties
(10mm)
C1 2 4.29m 0.3m x 0.3m 4 0.25m
Footing No. Width Length Thickness Steel Bars
(16mm)
F1 2 1.6m 1.6m 0.2m 9 pcs both
ways
Table 3.1.4.1

3.1.5 Design of Container Van Structure Footings

3.1.5.1 Floor Plan

Loads:

WDL = 2420kg x 9.81 ()

= 23.7402 kN

WLL = 1.9(2.44)(6.096)
 = 28.261 kN

WT = 1.2(23.70402) + 1.6(28.261)

= 73.706 kN

Weight per footing =

P1 = 36.853 kN

P2 = 73.706 kN

3.1.5.2 Footing 1

3.1.5.2.1 Design of Wide Flange Section

Specifications:

A36

L = 0.2 m Fy = 248 MPa

k = 0.7 E = 200 GPa

a. Cc = = 71.183

:Try W4 x 13

b.

c. Fa = 248 [
d.

3.1.5.2.2 Base Plate Design

W4 X 13

PEDESTRAL = 300 x 300 mm

 bf = 103.12 mm

d = 105.66 mm

a. B x N

A1 =

A1

BxN=

= 36.25 mm

:Try 150 x 150 mm

b. Fp

Fp = 0.35f’c

= 0.35(27.5)

= 19.25 MPa

c. Unity Check

Fp =

 ok!

d. Thickness

m=

n=

t = 2(33.752)

t = 5 mm

e. Anchor Bolts
 Using A325 bolts

Fs = 827.37 MPa

Pu = 36.853kN

9213.25 N =

d = 3.77

d = 10 mm

3.1.5.2.3 PEDESTRAL DESIGN

(5.9 kg/ft)(0.2m)()(9.81)(

= 0.3798 kN

Pu = 36.853 + 1.2 (0.03798)

= 36.899 kN

F’c = 27.5 MPa

Fy = 275

a. Dimensions

Assume

36.899 x

Ag = 2497.92 mm2

b2

b x b = 49.96 mm2
 :Try  300 mm x 300 mm

b. Steel Bars

Ast = gAg

= 0.02(2497.92)

= 49.96 mm2

n=

c. Check Steel Percentage

d. Lateral Ties

S = 300mm

S = 16(16) = 256  250 mm

S = 48(10) = 480  450 mm

:PEDESTRAL 300 x 300 x 200 mm with 4-16 mm bars

S = 250 mm

3.1.5.2.4 Design of Footing 1

a) C2 =
B = L = 0.56 1m

D = 150mm
b) qe = 120-23.54(0.15)(1.7)(1.5+0.15)
qe = 93.519 kPa
c) Af+g = =
:Try 1m x 1m
qu = MPa
d) Punching Shear:
Vu = quAshaded
Vu = (0.374)[(1000)2 – (300+d)2]
Vc = [4(300+d)]d
b0 = 4[300+d3)
Vc = [4(300+d)]d
Vc = 6.99 (300+d+d2)
Vu = Vc
(0.0374)[(1000)2-(300+d)2](0.85)[6.99(300+d)]
d = 17.81 50
d = 17.81+(1.5)(16)+75(169.28)
116.81 < 150 Safe
d = 50mm
e) Steel Bars
M
M
M
22.91 x 106 =(0.9)(Rn(1000)(50)2
Rn = 10.18

As =
As = (0.054)(1000)(50)
As = 2700 mm2
 lds = 264
finished ld = 350 – 50 = 300
300 > 264  Safe

3.1.5.3 Footing 2
3.1.5.3.1 Design of Wide Flange Section

Specifications:

A36

L = 0.2 m Fy = 248 MPa

k = 0.7 E = 200 GPa

a. Cc = = 71.183

:Try W4 x 13

b.

c. Fa = 248 [
d.

3.1.5.3.2 Base Plate Design

W4 X 13

PEDESTRAL = 300 x 300 mm

bf = 103.12 mm

d = 105.66 mm

a. B x N
A1 =

A1

BxN=

= 51.26 mm

:Try 150mm x 150 mm

b. Fp

Fp = 0.35f’c

= 0.35(27.5)

= 19.25 MPa

c. Unity Check

Fp =

 ok!

d. Thickness

m=

n=

t = 2(33.752)

t = 5 mm

e. Anchor Bolts

Using A325 bolts

Fs = 827.37 MPa

Pu = 73.706 kN
 Pu = 73.706 + 1.2 (0.03798)

= 73.706 kN

18.438 x 103 = N/mm2)

d = 5.33

d = 10 mm

3.1.5.3.3 PEDESTRAL DESIGN

F’c = 27.5 MPa

Fy = 275

a. Dimensions

Assume

73.706 x

Ag = 4989.609 mm2

b2

b x b = 70.67 mm2

:Try  300 mm x 300 mm

b. Steel Bars

Ast = gAg

= 0.02(4989.609)
 = 99.79 mm2

n=

c. Check Steel Percentage

d. Lateral Ties

S = 300mm

S = 16(16) = 256  250 mm

S = 48(10) = 480  450 mm

:PEDESTRAL 300 x 300 x 200 mm with 4-16 mm bars

S = 250 mm

3.1.5.3.4 Design of Footing 2

a) C2 =
B = L = 0.56 1m

D = 150

b) qe = 120-23.54(0.15)(1.7)(1.5+0.15)
qe = 93.519

c) Af+g = =
:Try 1m x 1m
 qu =
d) Punching Shear
Vu = quAshaded
Vu = (0.0741)[(1000)2 – (300+d)2]
Vc = [4(300+d)]d
b0 = 4[300+d3)
Vc = [4(300+d)]d
Vc = 6.99 (300+d+d2)
Vu = Vc
(0.0741)[(1000)2-(300+d)2](0.85)[6.99(300+d)]
d = 33.51 50
d = 33.51+(1.5)(16)+75(169.28)
132.51 < 150 Safe
d = 50mm
e) Steel Bars
M
M
M
45.76 x 106 =(0.9)(Rn(1000)(50)2
Rn = 9.42

As =
As = (0.047)(1000)(50)
As= 4230 mm2

lds = 264
finished ld = 350 – 50 = 300
300 > 264  Safe
 3.1.5.4 Schedule

Footing Footing 1 Footing 2

Number of Footing 4 2
Wide Flange Length 0.2m 0.2m
Base Plate Size 0.15m x 0.150m x 5mm 0.15m x 0.15m x 5mm
No. of Base Plate per Stump 2 2
No. of A325 Anchor Bolts 4 4
Size of Anchor Bolts 10mm 10mm
Pedestal Size 0.3m x 0.3m x 1.5m 0.3m x 0.3m x 1.5m
Pedestal Bars 4- 16 mm Bars 4- 16 mm Bars
Lateral Ties 250mm 250mm
Footing dimensions 1m x 1m x .2m 1m x 1m x .2m
Steel Bars 14 pcs BW 22 pcs BW
Table 3.1.5.4.1

3.1.6 Container Van Connections

 Size Total Length Price
Flat Bars ¼” x 2” x 6m 39.343199952 m ₱420.00 / pc
Angle Bars 1” x 1” x ¼” x 20’ 32 ft ₱690.00 / pc
Table 3.1.6.1
3.1.7 Design Of Comfort Rooms

3.1.7.1 Design
 3.1.7.2 Purlin Design

Roof Load = 34.73 Pa

Live Load = 1 kPa

Spacing = 0.5m

= 7.59

x = s = 0.5 = 0.5m

P = 0.0000473 = 0.0000473 = 1.892 kPa

Pn= = = 0.491 kPa

Weights:

= 0.491 (0.5) = 0.246 kN/m

Resolve

Resolve

Resolve
:Try LC 120 x 60 x 20 x 3.0

: LC 120 x 60 x 20 x 3.0

Rafter Design

:Try LC 120 x 60 x 20 x 3.0

: LC 120 x 60 x 20 x 3.0

3.1.7.3 Roof Beams

3.1.7.3.1 BEAM 1

a. Dimensions

m = -6.6 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = fy -

= -

Rn = 4.03

6.6 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 1819685.691

Try b = 200 mm

d = 231.21 250
 D = 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu =

= 1.4124 kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.4124)+13.4

= 14.722 kN/m

b. with Self Weight

M = -43.52 kN-m

Get act:

43.82x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.00156

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

=780mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

M
 M

: Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Wu = 14.722kN/m

Ru = 7.58kN

d = 250 mm

Vu = 3.8995kN

 REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS use minimum s = 125mm

3.1.7.3.2 BEAM 2

a. Dimensions

Wu = 8.28 kN/m

M = -4.3 Kn-m

Assume
 = 0.0162

Rn = 0.0162(275) -

Rn = 4.03

M = Rnbd2

37x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 1185552.798

Try b = 200mm

d = 225.85= 260 + 40

D = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu = 23.58(0.20)(0.30)

= 42.05

WT = 1.2(1.4124) + 8.28

= 9.97 kN/m

b. With Self Weight

M = 4.9 Kn-m

Get act:

4.9 x 106 = 0.90(275)(200)(260)2

= 0.0015

c. Get As:
 As = 0.0015(200)(250) = 745 mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

M)

M)

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Wu = 14.125kN/m

Ru = 7.82kN

d = 250 mm

Vu = 4.289kN

 REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS use minimum s = 125mm

 3.1.7.3.3 BEAM 3

a. Dimensions

M = -7 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = fy -

= -

Rn = 4.03

.11175 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 30810.59

Try b = 200 mm

d = 12.4 250 mm

D= 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu =

= 1.4124 kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.4124)+14.14

= 15.835

b. Get act:
 .376875 x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.00.169

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

= 254.5 mm2

d. No. Of Bars:

e. Check for Flexure :

MM

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Wu = 2.01kN/m

Ru = 1.508kN

d = 250 mm

Vu = 1.005kN
  REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS use minimum s = 125mm

3.1.7.4 Columns

3.1.7.4 .1Column 1
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
31.786 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = = 2151.79 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  2151.79
b = 46.39  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 2151.79 )
Ast = 93.04
 n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.21  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.1.7.4 .2 Column 2
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
30.329 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = = 2053.15 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  2053.15
b = 45.31  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
 Ast = 0.02 ( 2053.15)
Ast = 41.06
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.20  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.1.7.5 Wall Footing

CHB w/ Plaster = 2.98 KPa

CHB w/o Plaster = 2.5 KPa

P= 13.19 KN

f’c= 27.5 MPa

Fy = 275 MPa

qa= 120 KPa

a. qe= 120 – (23.54) (0.25) – 17 (1.5- 0.25)

 qe= 92.87kPa

qmax =

B= 0.142 m

b. qu=

d= 180 mm

c. Vu = 39.57 (0.25)(1)

= 9.89 KN

) (1000)(180)

= 133.72 KN

d. Mu = Pu ( x)

= 39.57 (0.125) (1000)(0.0625)

Mu= 309.14 KN-m

309. 14 x106 =0.9 Rn (1000)(180)2

Rn= 10.60

act =

act =0.05907

*min = = 0.00509

Use
 As =

= 0.05907 (1000)(180)

As = 10,632.6 mm2

n== 52.88 pcs.

S= = 18.91 mm

Ast = 0.002 (250)(400)

= 200 mmm

N= = 1.77 2 pcs.

S= = 125 mm

3.1.7.5 Footing

a.1.7.5.1 Footing 1

C1= 38.1418kN

D=150 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.15) – (17)(1.5 – 0.15)

qe= 93.519 KPa

b. Aftg =

:Try footing Dimension = 1x 1 mm

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.03814
d. Punching Shear

Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.03814) ((1000)2- (300 +d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (300 +d)

Vc = )

Vu =

(0.03814) ((1000)2 – (300+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (300d + d2))

d= 15.6

d =15.6 + (1.5)(1.6) +75 =114.6

114.6 < 150 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 50 mm

Mu= 38.142 (0.35) (1.) (

Mu=

2.34 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(1000)(50)2

Rn =1.09

)=

f. As=
 As= (0.05)(1000)(50)= 250 mm2

16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =350 – 50 = 300

300 > 264 : OK!

3.1.7.5.1 Footing 2

C2= 36.685kN

D=150 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.15) – (17)(1.5 – 0.15)

qe= 93.519 KPa

b. Aftg =

:Try footing Dimension = 1x 1 mm

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.03669

d. Punching Shear

Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.03669) ((1000)2- (300 +d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (300 +d)

 Vc = )

Vu =

(0.03699) ((1000)2 – (300+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (300d + d2))

d= 15

d =15 + (1.5)(1.6) +75 =114

114 < 150 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 50 mm

Mu= 36.685 (0.35) (1.) (

Mu=

2.24 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(1000)(50)2

Rn =1

)=

f. As=

As= (0.05)(1000)(50)= 250 mm2

16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =350 – 50 = 300

300 > 2264 : OK!
3.1.7.6 Septic Tank And Plumbing

3.1.7.6.1 Septic Tank

3.1.7.6.2 Plumbing
 3.1.7.7 Slab on Fill

t = 104.22mm = 150mm

3.1.7.8 Schedule

Beams Dimensions Length No. Main Bars Spacing of

(16mm)
Stirrups (10mm)
B1 0.2m x 0.3m 4.88m 1 4 .125m
B2 0.2m x 0.3m 4.88m 1 4 .125m
B3 0.2m x 0.3m 1.5m 2 4 .125m
Column Dimensions Length No. Main Bars Spacing of Lateral
s (16mm)
Ties (10mm)
C1 0.3m x 0.3m 3m 2 4 .25m
C2 0.3m x 0.3m 3m 2 4 .25m
Wall Width Thicknes 16mm 12mm bars
Footing s bar/
1m
WF1 0.4m 0.2m 53pcs 2pcs
 Slab on Dimensions Thicknes Spacin
Fill s g
S1 4.88m x 0.15m 0.4m
4.5m
Footing Dimensions Thicknes 16mm
s bars
F1 1m x1m .15m 2
F2 1m x1m .15m 2

3.1.8 Water Source

Varem pressure tanks are 99% efficient. Conventional pressure tanks use only
25% of the water inside them. While a 42 gallon tank might look impressive, in
reality, only approximately 12 gallons are used (“draw down”). With Varem pressure
tanks, 99% of the water is used. Thus, you can get rid of the excess size needed by
conventional pressure tanks. This allows Varem tanks to deliver the same
performance while reducing its size. Varem pressure tanks feature a replaceable butyl
bladder. While bladder tearing is rare, Varem pressure tanks are designed to make it
simple to reinstall the bladder when needed. Just unscrew the flange and replace.
Varem pressure tanks use a butyl bladder that separates the water inside the pressure
tank from the tank’s metal surface, thereby eliminating corrosion and rust
possibilities. Since the water is also separated from the pressurized air inside the tank,
water-logging is eliminated. Thus, after its initial installation, the Varem pressure tank
will continue to work with minimal maintenance necessary. Varem pressure tanks are
energy saving devices. Since pressure tanks reduce the start-stop cycles of pumps,
Varem pressure tanks are an effective way of reducing the frequency of electricity
surges needed to start a pump. The larger the pressure tank, the higher the electricity
savings.
 Peripheral pumps are small, affordable pumps that can be used for boosting
applications. Speroni peripheral pumps are self-priming, with suction of 7 meters (21
feet), can achieve pressures up to 5.8 bar (85 psi), have a capacity of up to 50 liters
per minute, and range from 375 – 750 watts (1/2 – 1 hp).
3.1.9 Power Source

The researchers designed the two-storey resettlement unit to be powered by

solar panels including also the toilet and bath building. Instead of a structure that is
usually run by regular electricity, the researchers thought of solar power is more cost-
effective. Solar power has its advantages since it requires the sun for it to work. The
sun is a renewable source of energy. This means an unlimited source of energy will be
used for the resettlement unit and toilet and bath building for their electricity.

3.1.9.1 Structure Power Source

Lighting

Area per Van = 6.096m x 2.438m

=14.86m2

x = 743.10 lumens

: LED Lights 800Lumens = 1, 10watts Light

 Electrical:

1 Light Bulb (LED) : 12 watts x 4 = 48 watts x 12 hrs. = 576 watts

1 Electric Fan : 65 Watts x 4 = 260 watts x 12 hrs. = 3,120 watts

Total : 3,696 watts

Miscellaneous : Total x 15 % = 3,696 x 15 % = 544.4

Total : 4,250 watts

 C.R.

Light Bulb (LED)

12 watts x 4 = 48 watts x 12 hrs. = 576 watts

 Water Pump

Volume of Tank = 500 Liters

Pump Capacity = 50li/min

½ hp = 375 watts

 Total = 4951 watts = 5kW

 Solar Panel:

Brand : One Point System Technologies

Price : P250,000 ( 5KW)

 3.1.9.2 Flood Lights

Features:

 Battery: Li-Ion which technically last forever

 Duration: Over 30hrs
 Charging Time: 6 hrs to 8 hrs
 PIR Motion Sensor technology activates full bright light whenever a person is
detected
 Night Sensor technology allows our flood light to automatically turns on at
dusk and shuts down at dawn)
 Smart Timer technology saves energy by providing different level of intensity
on different time intervals, specifically full brightness for 3 hours, followed by
a dim light of 30% brightness for the following hours
 IP65 Waterproof
 Conforms to CCC, CE, Energy Star, FCC, RoHS certification standard

3.1.9.3 Miscellaneous
 1pc - Inverter 0.75-1.5-2.2-3.7-4-5.5-7.5KW220v three-phase motor governor
(Jetmatic Motor to prevent Voltage overflow)
 Wire to Output(Included in Package of Solar Panel)
 Battery(Included in Package of Solar Panel)
 Wire + and - (package of + and - )

1st Floor for Socket = 4.876m

2nd Floor for Socket = 9.1816m

CR for Socket = 9.16m

1st Floor for Lighting= 2.438m

2nd Floor for Lighting = 2.438m

CR for Lighting = 9.16m

PVC Casing = 23.19m

 2 packs - Teckin Smart Plug,Wifi Socket Outlet With USB Port Compatible
with Alexa, Echo, Google Home & IFTTT, Timer Function, No Hub
Required, Control Electric Appliances & Devices, Prevent Overcharging
 8 pcs – Round LED Bulb Holder
 4 pcs – Standard Stand Fan
 8 pcs – 12 watts OMNI LED light bulb
 8 pcs – Light Switch
 3.2 Cost Analysis of Solar Powered Units

3.2.1 Estimate of Container Van Structure

CONTAINER VAN STRUCTURE

Total
Material Quantity Unit Price Unit Price
Cement (40kg) 53 bags ₱230 bag ₱12,190
Sand 2.4 m3 ₱1,500 elf ₱1,200
Gravel (3/4") 4.3 m3 ₱3,000 elf ₱4,300
16mm bars 463.93608 kg ₱43.60 kg ₱20,228
10mm bars 74.47773 kg ₱44 kg ₱3,277
GI Wires 19.2 kg ₱35 kg ₱672
5mm Base Plate 12.36375 kg ₱60.27 /kg ₱745
10 mm Anchor Bolt 24 pcs ₱544.55 /pc ₱2,614
W4x13 22.8 kg ₱74.75 /kg ₱5,592
129.08503
¼” x 2” x 20' Flat Bar 9 ft ₱420 /pc ₱2,711
1” x 1” x ¼” x 20’ Angle Bar 32 ft ₱690 /pc ₱1,104
3” X 2” X 10’ Lumber 180 pcs ₱245 /pc ₱44,100
2” X 2” X 10’ Lumber 16 pcs ₱175 /pc ₱2,800
P.E Foam Insulation 10mm Double /50m
Sided 214.04 m2 ₱1,000 2 ₱4,281
3" Nails 1 kg ₱100 /kg ₱100
1.22m x 2.44m x4.5mm Gypsum sheet /shee
Board 18 s ₱425 t ₱7,650
₱130,00
20 Footer Container Van Brand New 4 units 0 /unit ₱520,000
20 Footer Container Van 2nd hand 4 units ₱60,000 /unit ₱240,000
Total Brand New ₱633,563
Total 2nd Hand ₱353,563
Table 3.2.1.1

3.2.2 Estimate of Stairs

STAIRS
Uni
Material Quantity Unit Price t Total Price
bag
Cement (40kg) 36 s ₱230 bag ₱8,280
Sand 2 m3 ₱1,500 elf ₱1,000
Gravel (3/4") 4 m3 ₱3,000 elf ₱4,000
12mm bars 159.80654 kg ₱44 kg ₱7,031
 10mm bars 229.352 kg ₱44 kg ₱10,091
GI Wires 8 kg ₱35 kg ₱280
2"x2" Galvanized Tubular 79.92 m3 ₱455 /6m ₱6,061
Total ₱36,744
Table 3.2.2.1

3.2.3 Estimate of Comfort Rooms

CR
Material Quantity Unit Price Unit Total Price
Cement (40kg) 237 bags ₱230 bag ₱54,510
Sand 14.6 m3 ₱1,500 elf ₱7,300
Gravel (3/4") 8 m3 ₱3,000 elf ₱8,000
16mm bars 863.66 kg ₱43.60 kg ₱37,656
12mm bars 176.57 kg ₱44 kg ₱7,769
10mm bars 425.41 kg ₱44 kg ₱18,718
GI Wires 25.2 kg ₱35 kg ₱882
6" CHB 1217 pcs ₱11 pcs ₱13,387
C Purlins 2"x6"x20' 7 pcs ₱600 pcs ₱4,200
Nails 3" (kg) 2 kg ₱100 kg ₱200
10ft Corrugated Clear sheet 5 sheet ₱550 /sheet ₱2,750
4" PVC pipe (m) 0.5 m ₱592 /3m ₱99
2" PVC pipe (m) 0.5 m ₱210 /3m ₱35
P trap (pc) 1 pcs ₱281 pcs ₱281
3/4” pvc pipe 54 m ₱90.38 /3m ₱1,627
4”pvc pipe- sanitary 54 m ₱592 /3m ₱10,656
¾”90 Elbow pipe 17 pcs ₱11.80 pcs ₱201
4”90 Elbow pipe 18 pcs ₱43.20 pcs ₱778
3/4”Tee pipe 5 pcs ₱14.10 pcs ₱71
4”Tee pipe 5 pcs ₱40.05 pcs ₱200
Faucet 8 pcs ₱250 pcs ₱2,000
3/4" PVC clamp 54 pcs ₱3 pcs ₱162
Total ₱171,480
Table 3.2.3.1

3.2.4 Other Estimated Materials

Others
Quantit Uni Uni Total
y t Price t Price
Doors 4 set ₱1,500 set ₱6,000
 CR Doors 4 set ₱2,000 set ₱8,000
Windows 4 set ₱3,500 set ₱14,000
Solar Panel Package 1 set ₱250,000 set ₱250,000
Solar Flood Lights Package 1 set ₱7,500 set ₱7,500
₱27,999.7
Varem Pressure Tank 500L 1 set 5 set ₱28,000
Speroni Pump 1 set ₱3,250 set ₱3,250
Omni 12watts LED Light 8 pc ₱235 pc ₱1,880
Standard 65watts Stand Fan 4 pc ₱1,350 pc ₱5,400
Inverter 1 set ₱6,600 set ₱6,600
Wire + and – (package of + and - ) 46.4136 m ₱166.85 /m ₱7,744
PVC Casing 23.19 m ₱160 /m ₱3,710
Teckin Smart Plug,Wifi Socket Outlet 2 set ₱1,595 set ₱3,190
Round LED Bulb Holder 8 pc ₱15 pc ₱120
Light Switch 8 pc ₱50 pc ₱400
Total ₱345,794
Table 3.2.4.1

3.2.5 Total Estimated Price per Building

Total Estimated Price Using 2nd Hand Vans

Total Price
CONTAINER VAN STRUCTURE ₱353,563
CR ₱171,480
STAIRS ₱36,744
Others ₱345,794
Total Estimated Price per Building ₱907,581
Table 3.2.5.1

Total Estimated Price Using Brand New Vans

Total Price
CONTAINER VAN STRUCTURE ₱633,563
CR ₱171,480
STAIRS ₱36,744
Others ₱345,794
Total Estimated Price per Building ₱1,187,581
Table 3.2.5.2
 3.3 Comparative Cost Analysis
The researchers made a cost comparative analysis between the two storey
resettlement unit using container vans and the regular two storey reinforced concrete
building for their materials. All materials used from both structures were estimated
and solved. All parts of both structures are included in the estimation and solving. The
overall pricing of the resettlement unit is to be compared to the overall pricing of the
regular reinforced concrete unit. This will determine which is more economical of the
two said structures.
3.3.1 Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure
 3.3.1.1 Slab Design

a) Span Ratio
=
= 0.80 > 0.50 ∴ TWO-WAY SLAB
b) Thickness of Slab
t=
=
 = 61 mm ͌ 100 mm
c) Determine Super Imposed Loads
*Consider b = 1-m strip
WDL = (DL)(b) + δbt
= (2.74)(1) + (23.54)(0.1)(1)
= 5.094 KN/m
Wu = 1.2 (WDL)
= 1.2(5.094)
= 6.113 KN/m
d) Moment Coefficient
CASE 4

SPAN RATIO CaLL CbLL CaDL CbDL -Ca -Cb

0.80 0.048 0.020 0.039 0.016 0.071 0.029
e) Maximum Moment
e.1) Short Span
e.1.1) Middle Strip
Mu+ = 1.2 ( CaDL ) ( WDL ) (La2 )
= 1.2 ( 0.039 ) ( 5.094 ) (2.442 )
= 1.419 KN-m
e.1.2) Column Strip

*Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Ca (Wu) (La2 )

= -0.071 (6.113) (2.442 )

= -2.58 KN-m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- = - (Mu+ )
 = - (1.419)

= -0.473 KN-m

e.2) Long Span

e.2.1) Middle Strip

Mu+ = 1.2 ( CbDL ) ( WDL ) (Lb2 )
= 1.2 ( 0.016 ) ( 5.094 ) (3.052 )
= 0.91 KN-m
e.2.2) Column Strip

*Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Cb (Wu) (Lb2 )

= -0.029(6.113)(3.052)

= -1.65 KN-m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- = - (Mu+ )

= - (0.91)

= -0.303 KN-m

f) Effective Depth
f.1) Short Span
d = 100-20-6
= 74 mm
f.2) Long Span
d = 100-20-12-6
= 62 mm
g)

Direction Short Span Long Span

 Continu Middle Discontinu Continu Middle Discontinu
Location
ous Edge Strip ous Edge ous Edge Strip ous Edge
Mu
-2.58 1.419 -0.473 -1.65 0.91 -0.303
(KN-m)
ρ' 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509
As (mm2)
376.66 376.66 376.66 315.58 315.58 315.58
As = ρbd
Ab
36π 36π 36π 36π 36π 36π
12mm Ø
Spacing
(mm) 300.26 300.26 300.26 358.38 358.38 358.38
S=
BOTTO BOTTO
Position TOP TOP TOP TOP
M M

FORMULAS USED:
Mu = Øbd2 ( ρfy - )
ρmin =
=
= 0.00509
h) Number of Steel Bars
N=
=
= 8.126 ͌ 9 pcs.
3.3.1.2 Roof Beams

3.3.1.2.1 Beam 1
a. Dimensions

M = -6.6 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = fy -

= -

Rn = 4.03

6.6 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 1819685.691

Try b = 200 mm

d = 95.386 250

D = 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu =

= 1.4124 kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.4124)+13.4

= 15.094 kN/m
b. with Self Weight

M = -7.5 kN-m

Get act:

7.5 x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.00246

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

= 254.5 mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

M
 M

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 36.83kN

Wu = 15.094 kN/m

d = 250mm

Vu = 33.06

= 41.86

0.5 = 20.93

= 41.86 = 125.59

= 209.32

 REGION III

Smax = 532.31

Smax = 495.47

Spacing = 125mm

d = 1000 mm

Vu = 21.74

= 167.46

0.5 = 83.73
 = 167.46 = 502.37
= 837.29
 REGION I
 NO STIRRUPS
3.3.1.2.2 Beam 2

a. Dimensions

Wu = 8.28 kN/m

M = -4.3 Kn-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = 0.0162(275) -

Rn = 4.03

M = Rnbd2

4.3 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 1185552.798

Try b = 200mm

d = 76.99 260 + 40
 D = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu = 23.58(0.20)(0.30)

= 1.8124

WT = 1.2(1.4124) + 8.28

= 9.97 kN/m

b. With Self weight

M = 4.9 Kn-m

Get act:

4.9 x 106 = 0.90(275)(200)(260)2

= 0.0015

c. Get As:

As = 0.0015(200)(250) = 75 mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

 M)

M)

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 24.33kN

Wu = 9.97kN/m

d = 260mm

Vu = 21.74

= 41.86

0.5 = 21.77

= 43.54 = 130.62

= 217.69
 REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS use minimum s = 130mm

3.3.1.2.3 Beam 3
a. Dimensions

M = -7 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = fy -

= -

Rn = 4.03

-7 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 1929969.672

Try b = 200 mm

d = 98.2823 250 mm

D= 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu =
 = 1.4124 kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.4124)+14.14

= 15.835kN/m

b. Get act:

-7 x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.001723

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

= 254.5 mm2

d. No. Of Bars:

e. Check for Flexure :

M
 M

MM

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 34.5kN

Wu = 15.835kN/m

d = 250mm

Vu = 30.54

= 41.86

0.5 = 20.93

= 41.86 = 125.59

= 209.32

 REGION II

Smax = 532.31

Smax = 495.47

Spacing = 125mm

d = 1000 mm

Vu = 18.67

0.5 = 83.73
 = 167.46 = 502.37
= 837.29
 REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS

3.3.1.2.4 Beam 4

a. Dimensions

Wu = 14.02 kN/m

M = -9.5 kN=m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = 0.0162(275) -

Rn = 4.03

M = Rnbd2

4.3 x 106 = (0.9)(4.03)(bd2)

bd2 = 13096.22

Try b = 200mm
 d = 114260

D = 260 + 40 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu = 23.54(0.20)(0.30)

= 1.4124

WT = 1.2(1.4124) + 19.02

= 20.71 kN/m

b. Get act:

M = 10.3 Kn- m

10.3 x 106 = 0.90(275)(200)(260)2

= 0.003397

c. Get As:

As = 0.00339(200)(250) = 169.85 mm2

d. No. Of Bars:

e. Check for Flexure :

 M)

M)

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 50.53kN

Wu = 20.71kN/m

d = 260mm

Vu = 45.15

0.5 = 21.77

= 43.53 = 130.62

= 217.69

 REGION III

Smax = 5262.60

Spacing = 130mm

d = 1000 mm

Vu = 29.82

0.5 = 83.73

= 167.46 = 502.37
 = 837.29
 REGION I

 NO STIRRUPS

3.3.1.3 2nd Floor Slab

a) Span Ratio
=
= 0.80 > 0.50 ∴ TWO-WAY SLAB
b) Thickness of Slab
t=
=
= 61 mm ͌ 100 mm
c) Determine Super Imposed Loads
*Consider b = 1-m strip
WDL = (DL)(b) + δbt
= (2.74)(1) + (23.54)(0.1)(1)
= 5.094 KN/m
WLL = (LL) (b)
= (1.9)(1)
= 1.9 KN/m
*Check for reduction of LL
A = (s)(L)
= (2.44)(3.05)
= 7.442 > 37.5 ∴ LL NOT REDUCED
WLL = (Lr) (b)
= (1.9)(1)
= 1.9 KN/m
Wu = 1.2 (WDL) + 1.6 (WLL)
= 1.2(5.094) + 1.6(1.9)
 = 9.153 KN/m
d) Moment Coefficient
CASE 4

SPAN RATIO CaLL CbLL CaDL CbDL -Ca -Cb

0.80 0.048 0.020 0.039 0.016 0.071 0.029

e) Maximum Moment
e.1) Short Span
e.1.1) Middle Strip
Mu+ = 1.2 ( CaDL ) ( WDL ) (La2 ) + 1.6 ( CaLL ) ( WLL ) (La2 )
= 1.2 ( 0.039 ) ( 5.094 ) (2.442 ) + 1.6 ( 0.048 ) ( 1.9 ) (2.442 )
= 2.29 KN-m
e.1.2) Column Strip

*Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Ca (Wu) (La2 )

= -0.071 (9.15) (2.442 )

= -3.87 KN-m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- = - (Mu+ )

= - (2.29)

= -0.763 KN-m

e.2) Long Span

e.2.1) Middle Strip

Mu+ = 1.2 ( CbDL ) ( WDL ) (Lb2 ) + 1.6 ( CbLL ) ( WLL ) (Lb2 )
 = 1.2 ( 0.016 ) ( 5.094 ) (3.052 ) + 1.6 ( 0.020 ) ( 1.9) (3.052 )
= 1.48 KN-m
e.2.2) Column Strip

*Continuous Edge

Mu- = -Cb (Wu) (Lb2 )

= -0.029(9.15)(3.052)

= -2.47 KN-m

*Discontinuous Edge

Mu- = - (Mu+ )

= - (1.48 )

= 0.493 KN-m

f) Effective Depth
f.1) Short Span
d = 100-20-6
= 74 mm
f.2) Long Span
d = 100-20-12-6
= 62 mm
g)

Direction Short Span Long Span

Continuo Middle Discontinuo Continuo Middle Discontinuo
Location
us Edge Strip us Edge us Edge Strip us Edge
Mu
-3.87 2.29 -0.763 -2.47 1.48 -0.493
(KN-m)
ρ' 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509 0.00509
As (mm2)
376.66 376.66 376.66 315.58 315.58 315.58
As = ρbd
 Ab
36π 36π 36π 36π 36π 36π
12mm Ø
Spacing
(mm) 300.26 300.26 300.26 358.38 358.38 358.38
S=
BOTTO BOTTO
Position TOP TOP TOP TOP
M M

FORMULAS USED:
Mu = Øbd2 ( ρfy - )
ρmin =
=
= 0.00509
h) Number of Steel Bars

N=
=
= 8.126 ͌ 9 pcs.
3.3.1.4 2nd Floor Beams
3.3.1.4.1 Beam 1

a. Wu=16.7kN

M = -8.3 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0174
Rn = fy -

= (.00174)(275) -

Rn = 4.3

8.3 x 106 = (0.9)(4.3)(bd2)

bd2 =2.14x10^6

Try b = 200 mm

d = 95.386 250

D = 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu =

= 1.42kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.41)+16.7

= 18.39 KN/m

M = -9.1 kN-m
b. Get act:

7.5 x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.0003

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

= 150 mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

R = 39.87kN

Wu =18. 39kN/m

d = 250mm
Vu = R-Wud

= 39.87 – (18.39)(250)
Vu = 35.2725
Va = bwd

0.75(0.17)(1.0)((250)

0.5= 20.93 RI

= 41.86 RII = 125.59 RIII

= 209.5932 RIV

 RII

Smax = = 2532.4

Smax = = 495.47

Spacing =

 125 mm

d = 1m

Vu = 21.48

= 167.46

0.5 = 83.73

= 167.46 = 502.37

= 837.29

 NO STIRRUPS
 3.3.1.4.2 Beam 2

a. Wu =14.88 kN/m

M = -7.4 Kn-m

Assume

= 0.0174

Rn = 0.0174(275) -

Rn = 4.3

M = Rnbd2

7.4 x 106 = (0.9)(4.3)(bd2)

bd2 = 1.91x106

Try b = 200mm

d = 97.77 = 260 + 40

D = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

 Wu = 23.54(0.20)(0.30)

= 1.41

WT = 14.88+(1.2)(1.41)

= 16.57 kN/m

M = -8.2 Kn-m

b. Get act:

8.2 x 106 = 0.90(275)(200)(260)2 [ 1-]

= 0.00249

c. Get As:

As = 0.00245 (200)(260) = 127.428 mm2

d. No. Of Bars :

e. Check for Flexure :

M)

M)
 M

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 40.43kN

Wu = 16.57kN/m

d = 260mm

Vu = 36.12

= 43.54

0.5 = 21.77

= 93.54 = 130.62
= 217.69
 REGION III

Sx =532.41

Sx = 495.47

Spacing = 130mm

d = 1m

Vu = 23.86

= 167.46

0.5 = 83.3

= 167.46 = 502.31
 = 837.29
 NO STIRRUPS

3.3.1.4.3 Beam 3

a. Wu=18.04kN/m

M = -9 kN-m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = fy -

= -

Rn = 4.03

-9 x 106 = (0.9)(4.3)(bd2)

bd2 = 2.33x10^6 Try b = 200 mm

d = 107.83 250 mm

D= 250+50 = 300 mm

: Try 200 x 300 mm

 Wu =

= 1.4124 kN/m

WT = 1.2(1.4124)+18.04

= 19.73kN/m

b. b.Get act:

9.8 x 106 = 0.90 (275)(200)(250)2 [ 1-]

= 0.000609

min =

 use = 0.00509

c. Get As:

As = actbd

= 0.00509(200)(250)

= 150 mm2

d. No. Of Bars:

e. Check for Flexure :

 M

MM

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 48.14kN

Wu = 19.73kN/m

d = 250mm

Vu = 43.21

= 41.86

0.5 = 20.93

= 41.86 = 125.59
= 209.32
 REGION III

Smax = 6052.26

Spacing = 125mm

d = 1m

Vu = 28.41

= 167.46
 0.5 = 83.73
= 167.46 = 502.37
= 837.29
 NO STIRRUPS

3.3.1.4.4 Beam 4

a. Wu = 26.82 kN/m

M = -13.3 kN=m

Assume

= 0.0162

Rn = 0.0174(275) -

Rn = 4.3

M = Rnbd2

13.3x 106 = (0.9)(4.3)(bd2)

bd2 = 3.44x10^6

Try b = 200mm

d = 131260

D = 260 + 40 = 300 mm
 : Try 200 x 300 mm

Wu = 23.54(0.20)(0.30)

= 1.4124

WT = 1.2(1.4124) + 26.82

= 28.51 kN/m

b. M = -14.1 Kn- m

14.1 x 106 = 0.90(275)(200)(260)2[ 1-]

= 0.00432

c. Get As:

As = 0.00432(200)(260) = 224.64 mm2

d. No. Of Bars:

e. Check for Flexure :

M)

M)
 M

Adopt 200 x 300 mm w/ 4 – 16 mm bars

f. Stirrups

Ru = 69.56kN

Wu = 28.51kN/m

d = 260mm

Vu = 62.15

= 43.54

0.5 = 21.77

= 43.54 = 130.62
= 217.69
 REGION III

Smax = 450.31

Spacing = 130mm

d = 1m

Vu = 41.05

= 167.46

0.5 = 83.73

= 167.46 = 502.37
= 837.29
 NO STIRRUPS
 3.3.1.5 Roof Columns
3.3.1.5.1 Column 1
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa
16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
42.24 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = = 2859.483208 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  2859.483208
b = 53.47413588  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 2859.483208 )
Ast = 57.18966416
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.284438055  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
  use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm
3.3.1.5.2 Column 2
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa
16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 

68.67 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 

Ag = 4648.691096 mm^2
b =  4648.691096
b = 68.18131046  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column

b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 4648.691096 )
Ast = 92.97382192
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.462413854  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
 S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm

 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars

Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.5.3 Column 3
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa
16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
53.24 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = 3604.140293 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  3604.140293
b = 60.03449253  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 3604.140293 )
Ast = 72.08280587
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.358510465  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
 d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm
3.3.1.5.4 Column 4
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa
16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties

SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 

81.44 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 

Ag = 5513.170276 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  5513.170276
b = 74.25072576  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column

b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 (5513.170276)
Ast = 72.08280587
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.358510465  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
 g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.6 2nd Floor Columns

3.3.1.6.1 Column 1

SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
88.75 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = 6008.028757 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  6008.028757
b = 77.5111475  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column

b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 (6008.028757)
Ast = 120.1605751
 n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.597629672  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.6.2 Column 2
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
148.33 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = 10041.36232 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  10041.36232
b = 100.2065982  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
 b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 ( 10041.36232 )
Ast = 200.8272463
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.99883278  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.6.3 Column 3
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
121.6 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = 8231.845599 mm^2
b^2 = Ag
b =  8231.845599
 b = 90.72951889  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 (8231.845599 )
Ast = 164.636912
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 0.818836824  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm

 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars

Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.6.4 Column 4
SPECIFICATIONS
f’c = 27.5 MPa  = 0.65
Fy = 275 MPa

16 mm  Main Bar
10 mm  Lateral Ties
SOLUTION:

a. Assume  = 0.02
 =  0.8 Ag  0.85 f’c + g (Fy – 0.85 f’c) 
191.44 = 0.65 (0.8) Ag  0.85 (27.5) + 0.02 ( 275 – 0.85 (27.5) ) 
Ag = 12959.74113 mm^2
 b^2 = Ag
b =  12959.74113
b = 90.72951889  300 mm
:Try 300 mm x 300 mm column
b. Ast = g Ag
Ast = 0.02 (12959.74113)
Ast = 259.1948226
n = Astab
n = / 4 ( 16^2 ) = 1.289129289  4 pcs 16 mm  bars
c. Check STEEL 
g actual = 4 (4 (16)^2 / 300^2 = 0.0089
g actual < g assumed
 Safe
d. LATERAL TIES
S = 300 mm
S = 16 (16) = 256  250 mm
S = 48 (10) = 480  450 mm
 use 300 mm x 300 mm with 4 – 16 mm  bars
Lateral Ties spaced 250 mm

3.3.1.7 Footings

3.3.1.7.1 Footing 1

C1= 95.338 kN

D=200 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.2) – (17)(1.5 – 0.2)

qe= 93.19 KPa

b. Aftg =

:Try footing Dimension = 1.1 x 1.1 m

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.0788

d. Punching Shear:

Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.0788) ((1)2- (200 +d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (200 +d)

Vc = )

Vu =

(0.0788) ((1100)2 – (200+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (200d + d2))

d= 58.62

d =58.62 + (1.5)(1.6) +75 =157.62

157.62 < 200 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 60 mm

Mu= 78.8 (0.4) (1.1) (

Mu=

6.94 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(1100)(60)2

Rn =1.95
 )=

f. As=

As= (0.05)(1100)(60)= 462 mm2

#16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =400 – 60 = 340

340 > 210.88 : OK!

3.3.1.7.2 Footing 2

C2=154.91 kN

D= 200 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.2) – (17)(1.5 – 0.2)

qe= 93.19 KPa

b. Aftg =

: Try footing Dimension = 1.7 x 1.7 m

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.0536

d. Punching Shear
Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.0536) ((1700)2- (200 +d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (200 +d)

Vc = )

Vu =

(0.0536) ((1700)2 – (200+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (300d + d2))

d= 68.90

d =68.90 + (1.0)(1.6) +75 =167.9

200 > 167.9 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 70 mm

Mu= 53.6 (0.7) (1.7) (

Mu=

22.32 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(1700)(70)2

Rn =2.98

)=

As=

As= (0.012)(1700)(70)= 1428 mm2

 #16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =700 – 70 = 630

630 > 210.88; OK!

630 > 264 ; OK!

3.3.1.7.3 Footing 3

C3=128.18

D= 200 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.2) – (17)(1.5 – 0.2)

qe= 93.19 KPa

b. Aftg =

Try footing Dimension = 1.4 x 1.4 m

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.0654

d. Punching Shear

Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.0654) ((1400)2- (200 + d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (200 +d)

 Vc = )

Vu =

(0.0654) ((1400)2 – (200+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (200d + d2))

d= 77.50

d =77.50 + (1.0)(1.6) +75 =176.5

200 > 176.5 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 80 mm

Mu= 65.4 (0.55) (1.4) (

Mu=

13.85 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(1400)(80)2

Rn =1.72

) =)

As=

As= (0.007)(1400)(80)= 784 mm2

#16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =550 – 80 = 470

 470 > 210.88; OK!

470 > 264 ; OK!

3.3.1.7.4 Footing 4

C4= 198.02

D=250 mm

a. qe=qa-

= 120- 23.54 (0.25) – (17)(1.5 – 0.25)

qe= 92.87 KPa

b. Aftg =

:Try footing Dimension = 2.2 x 2.2 m

c. Effective d & D

qu = 0.041

d. Punching Shear

Vu = quAshaded

Vu = (0.041) ((2200)2- (250 + d)2)

Vc =

Bo= 4 (250 +d)

Vc = )

Vu =

(0.041) ((2200)2 – (250+d)2) = (0.85) (6.99 (250d + d2))

d= 94.56
 d =94.56 + (1.0)(1.6) +75 =193.56

250 > 193.56 ; OK!

e. Req’d steel area

d= 95 mm

Mu= 40.91 (0.95) (2.2) (

Mu=

40.61 x106 =(0.9)(Rn)(2200)(95)2

Rn =2.27

)=

As=

As= (0.009)(2200)(95)= 1181 mm2

#16mm bars :

Ldb= m

Ld= (0.06)(16)(275) = 264

Furnished ld =950 – 95 = 855

855 > 210.88; OK!

855 > 264 ; OK!

3.3.1.8 Wall Footing

CHB w/ Plaster = 2.98 KPa

CHB w/o Plaster = 2.5 KPa

P= 11.968 KN

f’c= 27.5 MPa

Fy = 275 MPa

qa= 120 KPa

qe= 120 – (23.54) (0.25) – 17 (1.5- 0.25)

qe= 92.87kPa

qmax =

B= 0.142 m

qu=

d= 180 mm

Vu = 35.904 (0.25)(1)

= 8.98 KN

) (1000)(180)

= 133.72 KN

Mu = Pu ( x)
 = 35.904 (0.125) (1000)(0.0625)

Mu= 280.5 KN-m

280.5 x106 =0.9 Rn (1000)(180)2

Rn= 9.62

act =

act =0.049

*min = = 0.00509

Use

As =

= 0.049 (1000)(180)

As = 8820 mm2

n== 43.87 pcs.

S= = 22.79 mm

Ast = 0.002 (250)(400)

= 200 mmm

N= = 1.77 2 pcs.

S= = 125 mm

3.3.1.9 Slab on Fill

t = 121.96mm = 150mm
 3.3.1.10 Schedule

Beam No. Length Width Depth Main Spacing of Stirrups

Bars (10mm)
(16mm)
RB1 4 2.44m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.125m
RB2 2 2.44m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.130m
RB3 4 3.05m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.125m
RB4 2 3.05m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.130m
2B1 4 2.44m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.125m
2B2 2 2.44m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.130m
2B3 4 3.05m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.125m
2B4 2 3.05m 0.2m 0.3m 4 0.130m
Table 3.3.1.10.1

Slab No. Dimension Thickness Spacing (S) Spacing (L)

(12mm) (12mm)
S1 4 2.44m x 3.05m 0.1m 0.3m 0.35m
S2 4 2.44m x 3.05m 0.1m 0.3m 0.35m
S3 1 6.096m x 4.88m 0.150m 0.4m 0.4m
Table 3.3.1.10.2

Column No. Dimension Length Spacing of Lateral Ties

 (10mm)
RC1 4 0.3m x 0.3m 2.59m 0.25m
RC2 2 0.3m x 0.3m 2.59m 0.25m
RC3 2 0.3m x 0.3m 2.59m 0.25m
RC4 1 0.3m x 0.3m 2.59m 0.25m
2C1 4 0.3m x 0.3m 4.04m 0.25m
2C2 2 0.3m x 0.3m 4.04m 0.25m
2C3 2 0.3m x 0.3m 4.04m 0.25m
2C4 1 0.3m x 0.3m 3.99m 0.25m
Table 3.3.1.10.3

Footing No. Dimension Thickness No. of Steel Bars (16mm) BW

F1 4 1.1m x 1.1m 0.2m 4
F2 2 1.7m x 1.7m 0.2m 8
F3 2 1.4m x 1.4m 0.2m 4
F4 1 2.2m x 2.2m 0.25m 10
Table 3.3.1.10.4

Wall Total Width Thickness No. 16mm No. of

Footing Length bars / 1m 12mm bars
WF1 28.048m 0.4m 0.2m 44pcs 2pcs
Table 3.3.1.10.5

3.3.2 Estimated Price of Reinforced Concrete Building

RC BUILDING
Material Quantity Unit Price Unit Total Price
Cement (40kg) 511 bags ₱230 bag ₱117,530
Sand 30.4 m3 ₱1,500 elf ₱15,200
Gravel (3/4") 20.1 m3 ₱3,000 elf ₱20,100
16mm bars 2144.9614 kg ₱43.60 kg ₱93,520
12mm bars 1106.0021 kg ₱44 kg ₱48,664
10mm bars 898.93 kg ₱44 kg ₱39,553
GI Wires 56.7 kg ₱35 kg ₱1,985
6" CHB 2255 pcs ₱11 pcs ₱24,805
Total ₱361,357
Table 3.3.2.1

Total Estimated Price of Reinforced Concrete Building

Total Price
RC BUILDING ₱361,357
CR ₱171,480
STAIRS ₱36,744
Others ₱345,794
Total Estimated Price per Building ₱915,375
Table 3.3.2.2

Total Estimated Price Using 2nd Hand Vans

Total Price
CONTAINER VAN STRUCTURE ₱353,563
CR ₱171,480
STAIRS ₱36,744
Others ₱345,794
Total Estimated Price per Building ₱907,581
Table 3.2.5.1

Total Estimated Price Using Brand New Vans

Total Price
CONTAINER VAN STRUCTURE ₱633,563
CR ₱171,480
STAIRS ₱36,744
Others ₱345,794
Total Estimated Price per Building ₱1,187,581
Table 3.2.5.2
 Chapter 4

Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1 Conclusions

 Our Group was able to design the Proposed Resettlement building using
container vans and solar panel as a power source.

 We were able to give a cost analysis on the Proposed Resettlement building, It

may be costly at first in building this than the usual concrete building but
through the years we can make benefit on having a free power consumption
and water supply. In some aspects the container van has the advantage because
it has already furnished walls while the concrete building doesn’t and by
purchasing large number of container vans the more it will become cheaper.
We added the solar panel in our project for the reason that the people who live
in remote areas doesn’t need to worry about electricity anymore, we made sure
that the solar panel is enough to give the power consumption that the people
need.

 Through comparison between a container van and concrete building, we

proved that the container van building is much faster to build than the concrete
itself. We manage to give analysis on how we can save time by using
container vans as a resettlement for people who lost their homes because of
natural phenomenon’s. We made sure that this building is much durable and
reliable when it comes to such disasters that we encounter in our country.

4.2 Recommendations

 The present investigators recommend future researchers who want to improve

this study to test the life expectancy of this building in order to assess the
 actual durability of the building. Research may opt to incorporate a rust
resistant agent on the container vans that were used and test the durability in
resisting rust.

 We also recommend to make an investigation on how much they can save on

having a solar panel as their power source than having a regular power supply
from a Power Company.

 The future researchers are recommended to build an aesthetical building made

of container vans with different sizes and shapes, they must put a touch of
architectural art in it.