GROUP-5-Internal-Control-Written-Report
GROUP-5-Internal-Control-Written-Report
DANTES, Jazmine M.
A. INTERNAL CONTROL
CONTROL FRAMEWORKS
A control framework is a data structure that organizes and categorizes an organization’s
internal controls, which are practices and procedures established to create business value and
minimize risk.
WHAT IS COSO?
COSO is a private sector initially established in 1985 by five financial professional associations.
The 5 financial professional associations:
• The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA)
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
• American Accounting Association (AAA)
• Financial Executives Institute (FEI)
• Institute of Management Accountants (IMA)
COSO’s goal is to improve the quality of financial reporting through a focus on corporate
governance, ethical practices, and internal control.
2. RISK ASSESSMENT
• Create companywide objectives.
• Incorporate process-level objectives.
• Perform risk identification and analysis.
• Manage change.
3. CONTROL ACTIVITIES
• Follow policies and procedures.
• Improve security (application and network).
• Conduct application change management.
• Plan business continuity/backups.
• Perform outsourcing.
4. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
• Measure quality of information.
• Measure effectiveness of communication.
5. MONITORING ACTIVITIES
• Perform ongoing monitoring.
• Conduct separate evaluations.
• Report deficiencies.
Benefits of COBIT
The professionals best suited for COBIT methodologies are those who are already in a position
to understand the nuances of IT governance in business management practices. The course will
be especially beneficial for:
• CIOs / IT Managers / IT Directors
• Risk Committee
• Process Owners
• Audit Committee Members
• COBIT 4.1 and earlier users
• IT Professionals in audit, risk, security, governance, and assurance sectors
Conclusion
While the modern world is gearing towards an environment of several emerging technologies,
including consumerization, cloud computing, social media, big data, and mobility, information
and IT is easily the new currency. This raises the success rate of many organizations, but at the
same time raises other challenging and complex management and governance concerns for
security professionals, enterprise leaders, and governance specialists. New businesses demand
that risk scenarios are better met with the power of information. COBIT 5.0 is the exact solution
the modern businesses are asking for.
Cadbury Report
The Cadbury Report, titled Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, is a report of a
committee chaired by Sir. George Adrian Cadbury that sets out recommendations on the
arrangement of company boards and accounting systems to mitigate corporate governance risks
and failures.
The 'Cadbury Committee' was set up in May 1991
It was formed by the Financial Reporting Council, the London Stock of Exchange and the
accountancy profession, with the main aim of addressing the financial aspects of Corporate
Governance.
Other objectives include
• uplift the low level of confidence both in financial reporting and in the ability of auditors
to provide the safeguards which the users of company's reports sought and expected;
• review the structure, rights and roles of board of directors, shareholders and auditors by
making them more effective and accountable;
o \
Corporate governance
Corporate governance is the system by which:
• Companies are directed and controlled
• Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies
• The shareholders' role in governance is to appoint the directors and the auditors and to
satisfy themselves that an appropriate governance structure is in place.
• The responsibilities of the board include setting the company's strategic aims, providing
the leadership to put them into effect, supervising the management of the business and
reporting to shareholders on their stewardship
The financial aspects of corporate governance:
• The way in which boards set financial policy and oversee its implementation
• Financial controls, and
• The process whereby they report on the activities and progress of the company to the
shareholders
Professional Advice
• They should always be able to consult the company’s advisers
• Consider it necessary to take independent professional advice
Directors Training
• Given the varying backgrounds, qualifications and experience of directors, it is highly
desirable that they should all undertake some form of internal or external training.
Directors Responsibilities
• Shareholders are clear where the boundaries between the duties of directors and auditors
lie, we recommended that a brief statement of director’s responsibilities for the accounts
should appear in the report and accounts, as a counterpart to a statement by the auditors
about their reporting responsibilities.
• The appropriate position for the director’s statement is immediately before the auditor’s
report, which in future will include responsibilities.
Standards of Conduct & Nomination Committees
• It is important that all employees should know what standards of conduct are expected of
them.
• A nomination committee should have a majority of non-executive directors on it and be
chaired either by the chairman or a non-executive director.
Auditing
• The audit provides an external and objective check on the way in which the financial
statements have been prepared and presented
• Audits are a reassurance to all who have a financial interest in companies, quite apart from
their value to boards of directors.
Professional objectivity
• Shareholders require auditors to work with and not against management, while always
remaining professionally objective.
• Accounting standards provide important reference points against which auditors exercise
their professional judgment.
• Shareholders look to the audit committee to ensure that the auditors are able to put their
views in the event of any difference of opinion with management.
Auditors Liability
• The legal position with regard to civil liability laid down should be altered by statute at the
present time.
• Auditors are fully liable in negligence to the companies they audit and their shareholders
collectively.
• Increased litigation that could arise from adapting the audit to meet changing needs and
expectations - a process which the Committee’s report itself is intended to encourage.
Audit Confidence
• The committee welcomes the initiatives of the profession's ethical rules and disciplinary
arrangements.
• Audit tendering will strengthen the standing and independence of auditors.
Techniques to improve and enforce auditing standards:
• tighter accounting standards
• effective audit committees
• rigorous and objective auditing
• action by the accountancy profession.
THE SHAREHOLDERS
Accountability of Boards to Shareholders
• The formal relationship between the shareholders and the board of directors is that the
shareholders elect the directors.
• A number of proposals addressing this issue were put forward by individual shareholders
and shareholder organizations.
• On the first proposal, we have not seen evidence explaining how it would be possible to
form shareholder committees in such a way that they would be both truly representative of
all the company’s shareholders and able to keep in regular touch with their changing
constituencies.
Accountability of Boards to Shareholders
• The second set of proposals raises such questions as what legislation would be needed to
alter the present thresholds for tabling shareholder resolutions, and where the costs
involved in circulating shareholder communications should fall
• In the meantime, shareholders can make their views known to the boards of the companies
in which they have invested by communicating with them directly and through their
attendance at general meetings
• Shareholders have delegated many of their responsibilities as owners to the directors who
act as their stewards.
Institutional Shareholders
• The proportion of shares held by individuals and by institutions has broadly reversed over
the last thirty years so that institutional shareholders now own the majority of shares of
quoted companies.
• Given the weight of their votes, the way in which institutional shareholders use their power
to influence the standards of corporate governance is of fundamental importance.
• The Institutional Shareholders’ Committee’s advice to its members to use their voting
rights positively is important in the context of corporate governance.
Conclusion
• The Committee’s proposals are mutually supportive and should be taken as a whole. The
Code reflects existing best practice and few of our recommendations require legislation
• No system of corporate governance can be totally proof against fraud or incompetence.
The test is how far such aberrations can be discouraged and how quickly they can be
brought to light
• Although the great majority of companies are both competently run and audited under the
present system of corporate governance, it is widely accepted that standards within the
corporate sector have to be raised
• The way forward is through clear definitions of responsibility and an acceptance by all
involved that the highest standards of efficiency and integrity are expected of them
• This will involve a sharper sense of accountability and responsibility all round -
accountability by boards to their shareholders, responsibility on the part of all shareholders
to the companies they own
An individual who has committed misappropriation may be liable to criminal prosecution for a
form of theft as well as disciplinary action, if the person is a civil servant.
Misstatements arising from Fraudulent financial reporting
INCENTIVE
Incentive, alternatively called pressure, refers to an employee’s mindset towards
committing fraud. An individual can be pressured or motivated to commit fraud because of a
personal financial problem, such as a large gambling debt. Sometimes, the pressure originates from
problems at work.
Examples of things that provide incentives for committing fraud include:
Bonuses Based on a Financial Metric
Common financial metrics used to assess the performance of an employee are revenues and net
income. Bonuses that are based on a financial metric create pressure for employees to meet targets,
which, in turn, may cause them to commit fraud to achieve the objective.
Investor and Analyst Expectations
The need to meet or exceed investor and analyst expectations to ensure stock prices are maintained
or increased can create pressure to commit fraud.
Personal Incentives
Personal incentives may include wanting to earn more money, the need to pay personal bills, a
gambling addiction, etc.
OPPORTUNITY
The person who plans to commit the fraud uncovers an internal control weakness and
doesn’t believe anyone will notice if he takes the money. Any internal control weakness, such as
a lack of oversight, offers the fraudster an opportunity to steal.
Typically, the fraudster starts by stealing a small amount of money and if he doesn’t get
caught, he’ll likely steal even larger amounts. An organization can reduce the risk of fraud and
decrease the opportunity for theft by developing and implementing effective internal controls.
Weak internal controls
Internal controls are processes and procedures implemented to ensure the integrity of accounting
and financial information. Weak internal controls such as poor separation of duties, lack of
supervision, and poor documentation of processes give rise to opportunities for fraud.
Poor tone at the top
Tone at the top refers to upper management and the board of directors’ commitment to being
ethical, showing integrity, and being honest – a poor tone at the top results in a company that is
more susceptible to fraud.
Inadequate accounting policies
Accounting policies refer to how items on the financial statements are recorded. Poor (inadequate)
accounting policies may provide an opportunity for employees to manipulate numbers.
RATIONALIZATION
The fraudster must decide that what he’ll gain from his fraudulent activity is more
important than the possibility that he might get caught.
The fraudster must justify the fraud. For example, the fraudster may think, “The company
won’t miss the money” or “The organization doesn’t pay me enough.” The individual may even
rationalize the fraud by telling himself that he’ll pay the money back.
“They treated me wrong”
An individual may be spiteful towards their manager or employer and believe that committing
fraud is a way of getting payback.
“Upper management is doing it as well”
A poor tone at the top may cause an individual to follow in the footsteps of those higher in the
corporate hierarchy.
“There is no other solution”
An individual may believe that they might lose everything (for example, losing a job) unless they
commit fraud.
For example, stealing inventory for personal use or for sale, stealing scrap for resale, colluding
with a competitor by disclosing technological data in return for payment.
Causing an entity to pay for goods and services not received
For example, payments to fictitious vendors, kickbacks paid by vendors to the entity's purchasing
agents in return for inflating prices, payments to fictitious employees.
Using an entity's assets for personal use
For example, using the entity's assets as collateral for a personal loan or a loan to a related party.
A. Incentives / Pressures
1. Personal financial obligations may create pressure on management or employees with
access to cash or other assets susceptible to theft to misappropriate those assets.
2. Adverse relationships between the entity and employees with access to cash or other
assets susceptible do theft may motivate those employees to misappropriate those
assets.one example, adverse relationships may be created by the following.
a. Known or anticipated future employee layoffs.
b. Recent or anticipated changes to employee compensation or benefit plans.
c. Promotions, compensation, or other rewards inconsistent with expectations.
B. Opportunities
1. Certain characteristics or circumstances may increase the susceptibility of assets to
misappropriation.
For example, opportunities to misappropriate assets increase when following situations exist:
a. Large amounts of cash on hand or processed.
b. Inventory items that are small in size, of high value, in high demand.
c. Fixed assets which are small in size, marketable, or lacking observable
identification of ownership.
C. Rationalizations
a. Disregard for the need for monitoring or reducing risks related to misappropriation
of assets.
b. Disregard for internal control over misappropriation of assets by overriding existing
controls or by failing to known internal control deficiencies.
c. Behavior indicating displeasure or dissatisfaction with the entity or its treatment of
the employee.
d. Changes in behavior or lifestyle that may indicate assets have been misappropriated.
5. 5. Tolerance of petty theft.
A. Incentive
Incentive or pressure to commit fraudulent financial reporting may exist when management is
under pressure, from sources outside or inside the entity, to achieve an expected (and perhaps
unrealistic) earnings target or financial outcome — particularly since the consequences to
management for failing to meet financial goals can be significant.
B. Opportunities
A perceived opportunity to commit fraud may exist when an individual believes internal
control can be overridden, for example, because the individual is in a position of trust or has
knowledge of specific weaknesses in internal control.
Fraudulent financial reporting often "involves management override of controls that otherwise
may appear to be operating effectively.
Fraud can be committed by management overriding controls user such techniques as:
Recording fictitious journal entries, particularly close to the end of an accounting period,
to manipulate operating results or achieve other objectives.
Inappropriately adjusting assumptions and changing judgments used to estimate account
balances.
Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition in the financial statements of events and
transactions that have occurred during the reporting period.
Concealing, or not disclosing, facts that could affect the amounts recorded in the financial
statements.
Engaging in complex transactions that are structured to misrepresent the financial position
or financial performance of the entity.
Altering records and terms related to significant and unusual transactions.
C. Rationalizations
Individuals may be able to rationalize committing a fraudulent act. Some individuals possess
.an attitude, character or set of ethical values that allow them knowingly a dishonest acts However,
even otherwise honest individuals fraud in an environment that imposes sufficient pressure on
them.
b. Receiving Kickbacks
In this scheme, a purchasing agent may agree with a vendor to receive a kickback
(refund payable to the purchasing person on goods or services acquired from
vendor).
This is usually done in return for the agent’s ensuring that the particular vendor
receives an order from the firm. Often a check is made payable to the purchasing
agent and mailed to the agent at a location other than his or her place of
employment. Sometimes the purchasing agent splits the kickback with the vendor’s
employee for approving and paying it. Detecting kickbacks is difficult because the
buyer’s records do not reflect their existence. However, when vendors are required
to submit bids for goods or services, the likelihood of kickbacks is reduced.
c. Purchasing Goods for Personal Use
Goods and services for personal use may be purchased by executives or purchasing
agents and charged to the company’s account. To execute such a purchase, the
perpetrator must have access to blank receiving reports and purchase approvals or
must connive with another employee. Fraud involving purchase of good for
personal use is more likely to go unnoticed when perpetual records are not
maintained.
1. Errors
The most errors that can occur in the payroll and personnel cycle are:
a) paying employees at the wrong rate,
b) paying employees for more hours than they worked,
c) charging payroll expense to the wrong accounts, and
d) keeping terminated employees on the payroll
2. Frauds Involving Payroll
The major payroll-related frauds include
a. Fictitious Employees
Adding fictitious employees to the payroll is one of the most common
defalcations. Detecting fictitious employees on the payroll is very difficult; but
auditors do sometimes perform a surprise payoff as a deterrent to this form of
defalcation. Alternatively, the auditor may turn the check distribution over to an
official not associated with preparing payroll, signing checks, or supervising
workers. Personnel files and the employees’ completed timecards and time tickets
may also be examined to substantiate the existence of absent employees.
b. Excess Payments to Employees
Increasing the rates above that approved or paying the employees for more hours
than they worked are the most common ways of paying employees more than they
are entitled to receive. These practices can be substantially reduced by requiring
personnel department officials to authorize changes in pay rates and by monitoring
total hours worked and paid for. Analytical procedures that focus on cost per unit
of actual production can also be helpful in detecting excess payments to employees.
c. Failure to Record Payroll
Companies having difficulty meeting profit targets or not-for-profit entities having
difficulty managing costs and expenses might fail to record a payroll. The omission
of payroll can be difficult to hide unless a similar amount of revenues or receipts
has been omitted. Analytical procedures can be performed to test the reasonableness
of payroll cost.
d. Inappropriate Assignment of Labor Costs to Inventory
A company having difficulty meeting profit targets might assign to inventory labor
costs incurred to budgeted cost that should have been charged to expense.
Analytical procedures such as comparing costs incurred to budgeted cost and
verification of valuation of inventory are some of the useful techniques in detecting
such fraud.