Zone I-V Extensor Tendon Repair: Mary Lynn Newport, M.D
Zone I-V Extensor Tendon Repair: Mary Lynn Newport, M.D
Philadelphia
__I
--I____
W N I w
_I____
Volume 2, Issue 1 51
A B
C D
unreconstructable comminution that requires use of the A transarticular K-wire is generally not recom-
fame suture pull-out method (Fig. 2). mended for injuries in zones I11 and IV unless there is
bony injury to warrant it or the patient is very unreliable.
Zones III and IV Any injury to the lateral band(s) should be repaired
In zones I11 and rV, repair of the central tendon should be primarily with fine (5-0 or 6-0) absorbable suture in a
performed emergently if there has been capsular damage. simple or mattress fashion.
It can be done urgently (within 3-5 days) if no joint in- The treatment of closed injuries in zone I11 is straight-
jury has occurred. Anesthesia should be adequate to al- forward after the diagnosis is made. An alumifoam splint,
low good visualization of the tendon ends. These repairs used dorsally or volarly, is applied to the PIP joint alone.
are generally better performed in the operating room, A dorsal splint allows better DIP motion, which is needed
where there is good lighting and adequate access to ap- to keep the lateral bands mobile and pull the extensor
propriate equipment. Simple injuries, without joint in- mechanism distally, thereby decreasing tension on the in-
volvement, can be done in the emergency department but jured central slip. A dynamic outrigger can be used for
junior-level trainees should receive sufficient supervision these closed injuries, but the results of static splinting are
to perform an adequate repair. The incision used should excellent and the treatment much simpler.
provide not only adequate visualization of the central
tendon but also the lateral bands. Using 4-0 suture mate- Zone V
rial, the central tendon is repaired by a modified Bunnell As with zone 111 injuries, lacerations of the extensor
or Kessler technique. These techniques have been shown mechanism in Lone V should be handled emergently if vi-
to be the strongest and most biomechanically advanta- olation of the joint capsule has occurred and less urgently
geous for extensor repair in these zones (10). Newer it’ the joint is intact. The laceration of the skin should be
techniques that are stronger and have better failure modes extended adequately to inspect the zone of injury and to
are currently being developed and tested. be certain that there is no injury to the sagittal band(s).
Zone I-V Extensov Tendon Repair
Volume 2.Issue I 53
M . L. Newpovt
A B
FIG. 4. A, B: Short arc active motion in postoperative treatment of extensor tendon injury in zones Ill-V,
range-of-motion exercises for the DIP joint. This regimen a repair that is strong enough to withstand active motion in
is continued for approximately 6 weeks. short arcs. This method has produced gratifying results in
our early trials, with excellent range of motion and no ex-
Zone V tensor lag or repair ruptures. The achievement of full flex-
We have traditionally treated lacerations of the extensor ion is particularly important because this is the arc most
tendons in zone V with dynamic splinting. With the advent frequently and significantly lost after extensor injury (9).
of a stronger suture technique and better understanding of The rationale for early motion should be extended to
active rehabilitation protocols, we are now using active patients with associated injury or with stable fixation of
motion as the postoperative treatment of choice for this the phalangeal or metacarpal fractures so that early ten-
zone. The MP joint is held in slight flexion and the DIP and don motion can be instituted. We know that the results af-
PIP joints are held in full extension in a hand-based splint, ter these combined injuries are significantly worse than
leaving the wrist free. The patient switches to a similar after simple tendon laceration, thus making adhesion pre-
splint that allows 30-40" of flexion at the MPjoint several vention even more important in this population (9).
times per day. Active flexion to the volar stop and active Extensor tendon injuries, although easily diagnosed
extension to neutral position are repeated several times at and often minimized, can result in significant loss of
each exercise session. No repair ruptures or extension lag hand function. Aggressive treatment of the injury with
using this method has yet occurred. The composite range meticulous repair and early mobilization improve the
of motion of the finger usually reaches normal soon after quality of the result and should cause us to focus on these
discontinuing the splint, usually within 1-2 weeks. Lacer- injuries as carefully as we do flexor tendon injuries.
ation to the sagittal band(s), when it occurs, necessitates
buddy taping of the affected finger to the appropriate adja-
cent finger(s) to prevent any radial or ulnar deviation that REFERENCES
could disrupt the repair of these delicate fibers. 1) Browne EZ Jr, Ribik CA. Early dynamic splinting for ex-
The postoperative regimen used after repair of closed tensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg 1989;14A:72-6.
rupture of the sagittal bands is slightly different. There is lit-
2) Chow JA, Dovelle S, Thomes LF, Ho PK, Saldana J. A
tle risk of adhesion formation to affect the outcome ad- comparison of results of extensor tendon repair followed by
versely, so early motion is less critical. We typically immo- early controlled mobilization versus static immobilization.
bilize the hand and wrist in a short arm plaster that includes J Hand Suvg 1989;14B:18-20.
the MP joints, which are held in full extension. Active range 3) Doyle JR. Extensor tendons: acute injuries. In: Green DP,
of motion of the PIP joints is encouraged. After 4 weeks, Hotchkiss RN, eds. Operative hand surgery, 3rd ed. New
immobilization is discontinued. Buddy taping the affected York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993:1925-54.
finger to the adjacent radial finger is recommended for 4) Evans RB, Burkhalter WE. A study of the dynamic
heavy tasks or athletics for another 1-2 months. anatomy of extensor tendons and implications for treat-
ment. J Hand Surg 1986;IlA:74-9.
5 ) Evans, RB, Thompson DE. An analysis of factors that sup-
port early active short arc motion of the repaired central
Just as we emphasize gliding protocols after flexor tendon slip. J Hand Ther 1992;5:187-201.
injury, we also follow that philosophy after extensor ten- 6) Kerr CD, Burczak JB. Dynamic traction after extensor ten-
don injury. The extensor tendon injury itself should be don repair in zone 6,7, and 8: a retrospective study. J Hand
treated as meticulously as flexor injuries. We try to obtain Surg 1989;14B:21-2.
7) Kettlekamp DB, Flatt AE, Moulds R. Traumatic dislocation namic extensor splinting. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:272-7.
of the long-finger extensor tendon: a clinical, anatomic, and 12) Newport ML, Williams CD. Biomechanical characteristics
biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg 1971;53A: of extensor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg 1992;
229-40. 17A:1117-23.
8) McFarlane RM, Hampole MK. Treatment of extensor ten- 13) Rayan GM, Murray D. Classification and treatment of
don injuries of the hand. Can J Surg 1973;16:366-74. closed sagittal band injuries. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:
9) Newport, ML, Blair WF, Steyers CM Jr. Long-term results 590-4.
of extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 1990;15A:961-6. 14) Saldana MJ, Choban S, Westerbeck P, et al. Results of acute
10) Newport ML, Pollack GR, Williams CD. Biomechanical zone 111 extensor tendon injuries treated with dynamic ex-
characteristics of suture techniques in extensor zone IV. J tension splinting. J Hand Surg [Am] 1991;16:1145-50.
Hand Surg 1995;20A:650-6. 15) Stem PJ, Kastrup JJ. Complications and prognosis of treat-
11) Newport ML, Shukla A. Electrophysiologic bias of dy- ment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg 3998;13A:329-34.
Volume 2, Issue 1 55