Independent Project Management Audit
Independent Project Management Audit
Synopsis:In Railway construction and doubling projects,normally three entities are involved in
successfully completing the project. These are the Client, Client’s Engineer and Contractor(s). It
is suggested to add one moreentity/ activityby way of Independent Project Management Audit
(IPMA). This has many advantages in complex, multi-disciplinary and major projects. The paper
describes what, why andhowof IPMA to be introduced in Railway Construction Projects.
==============================================================================
3.2 Do– Execution of the audit plan involves various tasks as follows;
The audit team should be empowered by the owner and it should be ensured that the
stakeholders provide quality time to interact with the auditors. The audit team should be
ensured that the audit team receives full and uninterrupted access to all the required people,
facilities, documents. Various steps to be followed in the conduct of the audit as given below:
Preparation of audit assessment remit and plan.
Collecting documentsand records such as contractor’s quality management
team, employer’s Project Management including Contract Management.
Reading the documents to check /verify the requirements and the potential risks
to the project, the control major for the risk, duty holder prepared by the
Contractor. It’s adequacy and correctness based on experience of other projects.
Opening meeting, kick-off meeting
Inspection of field records, test results, construction method statements
Interviewing various stakeholders
Carry out site inspections, witness important tests
Raise observations /findings
Closing meeting of field audit
Submitting audit reports to project team for compliance and generating
corrective and preventive action
Final report and/or presentation to the client top management
Follow up / Review of action items in the next audit
3.3 Check: The project team reviews the audit findings and develops action to correct
the non-conformities (repair)and further action plan to prevent recurrence of the
non-conformities. Even in the absence of any specific defect or non-conformity,
actions to improve various aspects of project performance are identified and
implemented.
3.4 Act: (Repeat) Inresponse to the IPMA and as corrective action,the Project owners
modify the rules, manuals, processes,specification, skillset etc. The implementation
and effectiveness of these improvements can be assessed in thenext IPMA.Thiswill
result in Continual improvement on the project.
3.5 Reporting: After auditing, a summary report may be submitted, and a presentation
made to the top management of the owner organization. This should cover the
executive summary of the detailed audit report, comments on the corrective and
preventive action envisaged by the auditee, lessons learnt etc. The report may be
prepared in a prescribed format.
4.0 Aspects of IPMA:Annexure 1 provide a short list of various aspects to be covered by the
IPMA. Important aspects of IPMA cover the following:
Overall project requirements and objective
Preliminary hazard and risk analysis and their management
Overall performance targets and acceptance criteria
Assessment of the contractor’s quality management in execution,
compliance to ISO 9000 series.
Quality plan, quality policy, procedures, organization.
Interface Management Control.
Project communication protocol
Construction technology and methodology
Code and Standards to be applied.
Availability of measuring,monitoring and testing devices.
Control of non-conformance in the processes
Competence and training of Employer’s and Contractor’s Team
Establishing internal and external quality control measures.
Establishing test plans, verification and validation tasks
IPMA is proposed because the Independence of the auditors ensures opinions being
free from project constraints. In addition, identification of deficiencies, shortcomings at
early stage of life cycle is done. At this stage corrective action is easier. TheIPMA
hasmany advantages, some of which are given below:
1. An independent and competent auditor brings insight based on his vast experience
and foresight, thereby helping identify problems at an early stage.
2. The deficiencies are identified early in the life cycle so corrective action is easier and
less expensive.
3. There is a reduction in risk to the project due to timely identification of critical issues
and bringing these to the attention of the project team and top management.
4. The stakeholders involved in day-to-day operations/ execution are often blinded by
their perspective of the situation. A third party is not constrained by this and has
greater chance of analyzing the situation objectively.
5. Independent auditors may contribute from the lessons learnt from other projects
6. Involvement of different members of audit team provides a diversity of views.
7. Positive intermediate audit reports boost the morale of employees. Certifying
agencies andclient will get additional comfort with positive audit reports.
8. Independent external auditors will comment on the performance of all the agencies
involved in the project such as General Consultant, Independent Engineer, Quality
assurance team and help to eliminate any deficiency related to skill or competency.
9. Impact of third-party opinion will be better on the contractors, consultants.
10. Regular audit reports of third-party will result in collection of facts which may be
useful for more effective dispute resolution (if required) at a later date.
11. It is a proactive action (as opposed to reactive action) by management to assess the
deficiencies in advance and take corrective action.
All Management Systems developed by the ISO are based on the framework of PDCA. The
same framework can be applied to the IPMA also.
In Railway projects, during planning stage the requirement of arranging these external
audits should be decided and incorporated in the contract conditions or technical
specifications of bid documents.Criteria for qualification of the auditor may also be
developed and laid down. The auditor(s) fulfilling the qualification criteria may be proposed
by the contractors and approved by client judging the competency, independency, quality,
past experience etc.The fees of the auditors shouldbe borne by the client and reimbursed to
the contractor so that the auditors are not influenced by the contractors.
Suitable mechanism may be built in the contract to ensure that the IPMA is not ignored or
delayed by the contractor. The top management should use the report of the auditors in
finetuning the project execution strategy and taking timely corrective actions at the
leadership level.
The final A ‘lessons learnt’ report at the conclusion of the project should be drawn and
effect of carrying out IPMA should be a mandatory part of this report.
7.0 Conclusion
Due to increasing complexity and size of the projects, traditional methods of monitoring by
senior management are not adequate. Presently there are three stakeholders in project
execution, whose priorities are project execution (time and cost) and notanalyzing the
situation and identifying gaps in achievement of ALL project objectives.Introduction of
Independent Project Management Audit as the fourthentity through independent external
audit will prove to be immensely beneficial for the project management as explained in this
article.