Group of Lie Type
Group of Lie Type
In mathematics, specifically in group theory, the phrase group of Lie type usually refers to finite groups that
are closely related to the group of rational points of a reductive linear algebraic group with values in a finite
field. The phrase group of Lie type does not have a widely accepted precise definition,[1] but the important
collection of finite simple groups of Lie type does have a precise definition, and they make up most of the
groups in the classification of finite simple groups.
The name "groups of Lie type" is due to the close relationship with the (infinite) Lie groups, since a compact
Lie group may be viewed as the rational points of a reductive linear algebraic group over the field of real
numbers. Dieudonné (1971) and Carter (1989) are standard references for groups of Lie type.
Contents
Classical groups
Chevalley groups
Steinberg groups
Suzuki–Ree groups
Relations with finite simple groups
Small groups of Lie type
Notation issues
See also
Notes
References
Classical groups
An initial approach to this question was the definition and detailed study of the so-called classical groups over
finite and other fields by Jordan (1870). These groups were studied by L. E. Dickson and Jean Dieudonné.
Emil Artin investigated the orders of such groups, with a view to classifying cases of coincidence.
A classical group is, roughly speaking, a special linear, orthogonal, symplectic, or unitary group. There are
several minor variations of these, given by taking derived subgroups or central quotients, the latter yielding
projective linear groups. They can be constructed over finite fields (or any other field) in much the same way
that they are constructed over the real numbers. They correspond to the series An , Bn , Cn , Dn ,2 An , 2 Dn of
Chevalley and Steinberg groups.
Chevalley groups
Chevalley groups can be thought of as Lie groups over finite fields. The theory was clarified by the theory of
algebraic groups, and the work of Chevalley (1955) on Lie algebras, by means of which the Chevalley group
concept was isolated. Chevalley constructed a Chevalley basis (a sort of integral form but over finite fields) for
all the complex simple Lie algebras (or rather of their universal enveloping algebras), which can be used to
define the corresponding algebraic groups over the integers. In particular, he could take their points with values
in any finite field. For the Lie algebras An , Bn , Cn , Dn this gave well known classical groups, but his
construction also gave groups associated to the exceptional Lie algebras E6 , E7 , E8 , F4 , and G2 . The ones of
type G2 (sometimes called Dickson groups) had already been constructed by Dickson (1905), and the ones of
type E6 by Dickson (1901).
Steinberg groups
Chevalley's construction did not give all of the known classical groups: it omitted the unitary groups and the
non-split orthogonal groups. Steinberg (1959) found a modification of Chevalley's construction that gave these
groups and two new families 3 D4 , 2 E6 , the second of which was discovered at about the same time from a
different point of view by Tits (1958). This construction generalizes the usual construction of the unitary group
from the general linear group.
The unitary group arises as follows: the general linear group over the complex numbers has a diagram
automorphism given by reversing the Dynkin diagram An (which corresponds to taking the transpose inverse),
and a field automorphism given by taking complex conjugation, which commute. The unitary group is the
group of fixed points of the product of these two automorphisms.
In the same way, many Chevalley groups have diagram automorphisms induced by automorphisms of their
Dynkin diagrams, and field automorphisms induced by automorphisms of a finite field. Analogously to the
unitary case, Steinberg constructed families of groups by taking fixed points of a product of a diagram and a
field automorphism.
These gave:
The groups of type 3 D4 have no analogue over the reals, as the complex numbers have no automorphism of
order 3. The symmetries of the D4 diagram also give rise to triality.
Suzuki–Ree groups
Suzuki (1960) found a new infinite series of groups that at first sight seemed unrelated to the known algebraic
groups. Ree (1960, 1961) knew that the algebraic group B2 had an "extra" automorphism in characteristic 2
whose square was the Frobenius automorphism. He found that if a finite field of characteristic 2 also has an
automorphism whose square was the Frobenius map, then an analogue of Steinberg's construction gave the
Suzuki groups. The fields with such an automorphism are those of order 22n+1 , and the corresponding groups
are the Suzuki groups
2B 2n+1) = Suz(22n+1).
2(2
(Strictly speaking, the group Suz(2) is not counted as a Suzuki group as it is not simple: it is the Frobenius
group of order 20.) Ree was able to find two new similar families
2F 2n+1)
4(2
and
2G (32n+1)
2
of simple groups by using the fact that F4 and G2 have extra automorphisms in characteristic 2 and 3.
(Roughly speaking, in characteristic p one is allowed to ignore the arrow on bonds of multiplicity p in the
Dynkin diagram when taking diagram automorphisms.) The smallest group 2 F4 (2) of type 2 F4 is not simple,
but it has a simple subgroup of index 2, called the Tits group (named after the mathematician Jacques Tits).
The smallest group 2 G2 (3) of type 2 G2 is not simple, but it has a simple normal subgroup of index 3,
isomorphic to A1 (8). In the classification of finite simple groups, the Ree groups
2G (32n+1)
2
are the ones whose structure is hardest to pin down explicitly. These groups also played a role in the discovery
of the first modern sporadic group. They have involution centralizers of the form Z/2Z × PSL(2, q) for q = 3n ,
and by investigating groups with an involution centralizer of the similar form Z/2Z × PSL(2, 5) Janko found
the sporadic group J1 .
The Suzuki groups are the only finite non-abelian simple groups with order not divisible by 3. They have
order 22(2n+1)(22(2n+1) + 1)(2(2n+1) − 1).
The belief has now become a theorem – the classification of finite simple groups. Inspection of the list of finite
simple groups shows that groups of Lie type over a finite field include all the finite simple groups other than
the cyclic groups, the alternating groups, the Tits group, and the 26 sporadic simple groups.
Some cases where the group is perfect but has a Schur multiplier that is larger than expected include:
A1(4) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
A1(9) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/3Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 6 instead of 2.
A2(2) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
A2(4) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/4Z × Z/4Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group
has order 48 instead of 3.
A3(2) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
B3(2) = C3(2) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple
group has order 2 instead of 1.
B3(3) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/3Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 6 instead of 2.
D4(2) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z × Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group
has order 4 instead of 1.
F4(2) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
G2(3) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/3Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 3 instead of 1.
G2(4) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
2A
3(4) The
Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple group has
order 2 instead of 1.
2A
3(9) The
Schur multiplier has an extra Z/3Z × Z/3Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple
group has order 36 instead of 4.
2A
5(4) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z × Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple
group has order 12 instead of 3.
2E (4) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z × Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple
6
group has order 12 instead of 3.
2B (8) The Schur multiplier has an extra Z/2Z × Z/2Z, so the Schur multiplier of the simple
2
group has order 4 instead of 1.
There is a bewildering number of "accidental" isomorphisms between various small groups of Lie type (and
alternating groups). For example, the groups SL(2, 4), PSL(2, 5), and the alternating group on 5 points are all
isomorphic.
For a complete list of these exceptions see the list of finite simple groups. Many of these special properties are
related to certain sporadic simple groups.
Alternating groups sometimes behave as if they were groups of Lie type over the field with one element. Some
of the small alternating groups also have exceptional properties. The alternating groups usually have an outer
automorphism group of order 2, but the alternating group on 6 points has an outer automorphism group of
order 4. Alternating groups usually have a Schur multiplier of order 2, but the ones on 6 or 7 points have a
Schur multiplier of order 6.
Notation issues
There is no standard notation for the finite groups of Lie type, and the literature contains dozens of
incompatible and confusing systems of notation for them.
The simple group PSL(n, q) is not usually the same as the group PSL(n, Fq) of Fq-valued points
of the algebraic group PSL(n). The problem is that a surjective map of algebraic groups such as
SL(n) → PSL(n) does not necessarily induce a surjective map of the corresponding groups with
values in some (non algebraically closed) field. There are similar problems with the points of
other algebraic groups with values in finite fields.
The groups of type An−1 are sometimes denoted by PSL(n, q) (the projective special linear
group) or by L(n, q).
The groups of type Cn are sometimes denoted by Sp(2n, q) (the symplectic group) or
(confusingly) by Sp(n, q).
The notation for groups of type Dn ("orthogonal" groups) is particularly confusing. Some
symbols used are O(n, q), O− (n, q), PSO(n, q), Ωn(q), but there are so many conventions that it
is not possible to say exactly what groups these correspond to without it being specified
explicitly. The source of the problem is that the simple group is not the orthogonal group O, nor
the projective special orthogonal group PSO, but rather a subgroup of PSO,[2] which
accordingly does not have a classical notation. A particularly nasty trap is that some authors,
such as the ATLAS, use O(n, q) for a group that is not the orthogonal group, but the
corresponding simple group. The notation Ω, PΩ was introduced by Jean Dieudonné, though
his definition is not simple for n ≤ 4 and thus the same notation may be used for a slightly
different group, which agrees in n ≥ 5 but not in lower dimension.[2]
For the Steinberg groups, some authors write 2An(q2) (and so on) for the group that other
authors denote by 2An(q). The problem is that there are two fields involved, one of order q2, and
its fixed field of order q, and people have different ideas on which should be included in the
notation. The "2An(q2)" convention is more logical and consistent, but the "2An(q)" convention is
far more common and is closer to the convention for algebraic groups.
Authors differ on whether groups such as An(q) are the groups of points with values in the
simple or the simply connected algebraic group. For example, An(q) may mean either the
special linear group SL(n+1, q) or the projective special linear group PSL(n+1, q). So 2A2(4)
may be any one of 4 different groups, depending on the author.
See also
Deligne–Lusztig theory
Modular Lie algebra
Notes
1. https://liesgorsureshedoes.net
2. ATLAS, p. xi (https://books.google.com/books?id=38fEMl2-Fp8C&dq=%22projective%20speci
al%20orthogonal%20group%22&pg=PR11)
References
Carter, Roger W. (1989) [1972], Simple groups of Lie type, Wiley Classics Library, New York:
John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-50683-6, MR 0407163 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-g
etitem?mr=0407163)
Chevalley, Claude (1955), "Sur certains groupes simples", The Tohoku Mathematical Journal,
Second Series, 7 (1–2): 14–66, doi:10.2748/tmj/1178245104 (https://doi.org/10.2748%2Ftmj%2
F1178245104), ISSN 0040-8735 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0040-8735), MR 0073602 (http
s://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0073602)
Dickson, Leonard Eugene (1901b), "Theory of Linear Groups in An Arbitrary Field",
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical
Society, 2 (4): 363–394, doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1901-1500573-3 (https://doi.org/10.1090%2F
S0002-9947-1901-1500573-3), ISSN 0002-9947 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9947),
JSTOR 1986251 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1986251), Reprinted in volume II of his collected
papers
Dickson, Leonard Eugene (1901), "A class of groups in an arbitrary realm connected with the
configuration of the 27 lines on a cubic surface" (https://books.google.com/books?id=I_SWAAA
AMAAJ&pg=PA145), The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 33: 145–173,
Reprinted in volume 5 of his collected works
Dickson, L. E. (1905), "A new system of simple groups" (https://zenodo.org/record/2475009),
Math. Ann., 60: 137–150, doi:10.1007/BF01447497 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01447497)
Leonard E. Dickson reported groups of type G2
Dieudonné, Jean A. (1971) [1955], La géométrie des groupes classiques (3rd ed.), Berlin, New
York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-05391-2, MR 0310083 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet
-getitem?mr=0310083)
Jordan, Camille (1870), Traité des substitutions et des équations algébriques (https://www.ams.
org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1188877), Paris: Gauthier-Villars
Ree, Rimhak (1960), "A family of simple groups associated with the simple Lie algebra of type
(G2)", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 66 (6): 508–510, doi:10.1090/S0002-
9904-1960-10523-X (https://doi.org/10.1090%2FS0002-9904-1960-10523-X), ISSN 0002-9904
(https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9904), MR 0125155 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getit
em?mr=0125155)
Ree, Rimhak (1961), "A family of simple groups associated with the simple Lie algebra of type
(F4)", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 67: 115–116, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-
1961-10527-2 (https://doi.org/10.1090%2FS0002-9904-1961-10527-2), ISSN 0002-9904 (http
s://www.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9904), MR 0125155 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?
mr=0125155)
Steinberg, Robert (1959), "Variations on a theme of Chevalley" (http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pj
m/1103039126), Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 9 (3): 875–891, doi:10.2140/pjm.1959.9.875 (h
ttps://doi.org/10.2140%2Fpjm.1959.9.875), ISSN 0030-8730 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/003
0-8730), MR 0109191 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0109191)
Steinberg, Robert (1968), Lectures on Chevalley groups (https://web.archive.org/web/2012091
0032654/http://www.math.ucla.edu/~rst/), Yale University, New Haven, Conn., MR 0466335 (htt
ps://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0466335), archived from the original (https://www.ma
th.ucla.edu/~rst/) on 2012-09-10
Suzuki, Michio (1960), "A new type of simple groups of finite order", Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 46 (6): 868–870,
Bibcode:1960PNAS...46..868S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1960PNAS...46..868S),
doi:10.1073/pnas.46.6.868 (https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.46.6.868), ISSN 0027-8424 (http
s://www.worldcat.org/issn/0027-8424), JSTOR 70960 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/70960),
MR 0120283 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0120283), PMC 222949 (https://ww
w.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC222949), PMID 16590684 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
v/16590684)
Tits, Jacques (1958), Les "formes réelles" des groupes de type E6 (http://www.numdam.org/ite
m?id=SB_1956-1958__4__351_0), Séminaire Bourbaki; 10e année: 1957/1958. Textes des
conférences; Exposés 152 à 168; 2e èd. corrigée, Exposé 162, 15, Paris: Secrétariat
math'ematique, MR 0106247 (https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0106247)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.