Module 9 - Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Module 9 - Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Learning Objectives:
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in
initiatives that benefit the society (Camilar-Serrano, 2016). It encompasses all general and
specific responsibilities that a business has to the society in which it operates (Hartman, et al.,
2014). A corporate culture that includes a sustainability agenda or a CSR report can create
long-term favorable stakeholder responses. In addition, CSR performance can increase
employees’ company identification, organizational citizenship, and commitment (Ferrell, et al.,
2017).
When we say that a business is responsible, we might mean that it is reliable or trustworthy (e.g.
recommending a car dealership to a friend because it has a proven track record of being
responsible and credible). It could also involve attributing something as a cause for an event or
action (e.g. poor lending practices were responsible, or the cause, of the collapse of many
banks in the US during the 2008 economic crisis). Lastly, it involves attributing liability or
accountability for some event or action, creating an obligation to make things right again (e.g. to
say that a specific company is responsible for air and water pollution in the community doesnot
only mean that the company caused the pollution, but it also has the obligation to reduce or
completely eliminate the amount of pollution it caused, including other related
circumstances resulting from it).
Philosophers often distinguish between three different levels of responsibilities in this sense, on a
scale from more or less demanding to binding.
1. The responsibility not to cause harm. Even when not explicitly prohibited by law, ethics would
demand that we not cause avoidable harm. If a business causes harm to someone and, if that
harm could have been avoided by exercising due care or proper planning, then both the law
and ethics would say that the business should be held liable for violating its responsibilities.
In practice, this ethical requirement is the type of responsibility established by the precedents of
tort law. When it is discovered that a product causes harm, the business can appropriately be
prevented from marketing that product and can be held liable forharms and/or damages
caused by it.
2. The responsibility to prevent harm. To illustrate this, let’s consider the actions taken by the
pharmaceutical firm Merck with its drug Mectizan. Mectizan is a Merck drug that prevents river
Business Ethics & Social Responsibility Page 2 of 4
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Governor Pack Road, Baguio City, Philippines 2600
Tel. Nos.: (+6374) 442-3316, 442-8220; 444-2786;
442-2564; 442-8219; 442-8256; Fax No.: 442-6268 Grade Level/Section: ABM -12
Email: [email protected]; Website: www.uc-bcf.edu.ph
blindness, a disease prevalent in tropical nations. This disease infects around 40 to 100 million
people annually, causing severe rashes, itching, and loss of sight. However, this drug would not
be a very profitable drug to bring to the market because it has a once-a-yeardosage (limiting
demand for the drug among those people who require it) and people who need the drug are
among the poorest people in the poorest regions of Africa, Asia, Central America, and South
America. So in 1987, Merck began a program that provides Mectizan free of charge to people
at risk for river blindness, and pledged to “give it away free, forever.” In summary, Merck was
not responsible for causing river blindness but they still assumed the social responsibility to easily
control the disease with the use of their patented drug.
3. The responsibility to do good. The most wide-ranging standard of CSR would hold that the
business has a social responsibility to do good things and to make society a better place.
Corporate philanthropy would be the most obvious case in which business takes on a
responsibility to do good. Corporate giving programs to support community projects in the arts,
education, and culture are clear examples. In addition, some organizations and
corporations have a charitable foundation or office that deals with such philanthropic
programs (examples are illustrated below).
a. Angat Buhay – a non-profit organization that links private companies, organizations, and
individuals with the marginalized sector and is one of the major partners of the Office of
the Vice President (OVP) of the Republic of the Philippines
b. Ronald McDonald House Charities (RMHC) Philippines – the flagship charitable arm of
McDonald’s Philippines, it is a global organization whose mission is to make a difference
in the lives of Filipino children through programs that support their need for shelter,
education, and happiness
c. Project H.E.L.E.N. – was formed as an avenue of extension service of the University of the
Cordilleras to the communities for a sustainable development thrust in improving the
quality of life for the less fortunate in terms of health, education, livelihood, and the
environment
d. Starbucks Coffee – the company practices conservation as well as Starbucks Coffee and
Farmer Equity Practices (C.A.F.E.), a set of socially responsible coffee-buying guidelines
that ensure preferential buying status for participants that receive high scores in best
practices, and involves paying coffee farmers premium prices to help them make profits
and support their families
e. Ramon Aboitiz Foundation – established by the Aboitiz Group as its corporate foundation
to address the social and economic development needs of its stakeholders and the
society, it focuses on key areas such as integrated development, micro-finance and
entrepreneurship, culture and heritage, leadership and citizenship, and education
1. The Economic Model of CSR holds that the business’ sole duty is to fulfill the economic
functions businesses were designed to serve. On this narrow view, the social responsibility of
business managers is simply to pursue profit within the law. Because profit is an indication
that business is efficiently and successfully producing the goods and services the society
demands, profit is a direct measure of how well a business is meeting the society’s
expectations. Because corporations are created by the society and require a stable political
and economic infrastructure in which to conduct business, like all other institutions, they are
expected to obey the legal mandates established by the society.
2. As the name suggests, the Philanthropic Model of CSR holds that, like individuals, the business
is free to contribute to social causes as a matter of philanthropy. From this perspective, the
business has no strict obligation to contribute to social causes, but it can be a good thing
Business Ethics & Social Responsibility Page 3 of 4
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Governor Pack Road, Baguio City, Philippines 2600
Tel. Nos.: (+6374) 442-3316, 442-8220; 444-2786;
442-2564; 442-8219; 442-8256; Fax No.: 442-6268 Grade Level/Section: ABM -12
Email: [email protected]; Website: www.uc-bcf.edu.ph
when they do so. This approach is especially common in small, locally-owned businesses
where the owners also often play a prominent leadership role within their local community.
Within the philanthropy model, there are occasions in which charity work is done because it
brings the firm good public relations, provides a helpful tax deduction, and builds goodwill
and/or reputation within the community. However, there are also some cases in which
businesses might contribute to a social cause without seeking any reputational benefit.
3. A variety of perspectives would fall under the Social Web Model of CSR because they all
share in common the view that the business exists within a web of social relationships. The
social web model views business as a citizen of the society in which it operates and, like all
members of a society, the business must conform to the normal ethical duties and obligations
that we all face. While producing goods and services and creating wealth and profits are
among the business’ responsibilities, they do not trump the other ethical responsibilities that
equally bind all members of the society. Examples of practices under this model includes the
high respect for human rights, specifically on employee working conditions, the right to
privacy, and the right to due process.
4. The Integrative Model of CSR refers to the framework used by firms that bring social goals into
the core of their business model and fully integrate economic and social goals. There is
indeed a growing recognition that some for-profit organizations also have social goals as a
central part of the strategic mission of the organization. In two areas in particular, namely
social entrepreneurship and sustainability, we find for-profit firms that do not assume a
tension between profit and social responsibility. In relation to the implications of sustainability
in this model, sustainability holds that a firm’s financial goals must be balanced against, and
perhaps even overridden by environmental considerations. This sustainability version of CSR
suggests that the long-term financial well-being of every firm is directly tied to questions of
how the firm both affects and is affected by the natural environment. A business model that
ignores the biophysical and ecological context of its activities is a business model doomed
to the future.
REFERENCES:
BAL 174.4 Jerusalem, Violeta L. (2017). Business Ethics and Social Responsibility:
J487 2017 Concepts, principles, and practices ofethical standards. Manila,
Philippines: FASTBOOKS Educational Supply, Inc.
E-Book Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape our Decisions.
Revised and expanded edition. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
E-book Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J., and Ferrell, L. (2017). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision
Making and Cases. 11th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
BAL 174.4 Camilar-Serrano, A. (2016). Business Ethics and Social Responsibility. Manila:
Se683 2016 Unlimited Books Library Services & Publishing, Inc.
BAL 174.4 Hartman, L., DesJardins, J., and MacDonald, C. (2014). Business Ethics:
H2 5 5 6 2 0 14 Decision Making for Personal Integrity and Social Responsibility. New York: McGraw-
Hill Irwin.