SkyCiv Beam - Hand Calculations - AJW8CTBuLE8YKrkKaG8KTtPAw8k74LSY
SkyCiv Beam - Hand Calculations - AJW8CTBuLE8YKrkKaG8KTtPAw8k74LSY
The first step in any beam problem is to calculate the reaction forces at the supports. To do this we must consider that the beam
is in static equilibrium. This means that we balance or resolve the forces acting on the beam.
After finding all the forces acting on the beam we can draw a free body diagram (FBD) and then balance these forces for static
equilibrium.
Vertical Reactions
2000 N
1200 N
RA RB
x
x (m)
0 0.4 0.8 1.6
Let the left support have a vertical reaction RA and the right support have a vertical reaction RB .
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
RA + RB − 2000 − 1200 = 0
RA + RB − 2000 − 1200 = 0
+ ↻ ΣM = 0
RA + RB = +3200
RA + 1100 = +3200
RA = +2100N
You should aim to 'cut' the beam between loads, supports and along distributed loads. After taking a cut you simply consider
equilibirium in the y-axis (i.e. let the sum of the forces in the y-axis equal zero and solve for the unknown shear force V).
If you follow this procedure for every cut/section then you will Find the equation of shear force for every segment of the beam
and therefore you can create the shear force diagram (SFD).
V1
(x)
2100 N
x (m)
0 x 1.6
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
+2100 − V1 (x) = 0
V1 (x) = +2100
2000 N
V2
(x)
2100 N
x (m)
0 0.4 1.6
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
V2 (x) = +100
2000 N
1200 N
V3
(x)
2100 N
x (m)
0 0.4 0.8 x 1.6
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
V3 (x) = −1100
You should aim to 'cut' the beam between loads, supports and along distributed loads. After taking a cut you simply consider
equilibirium about the point of the cut (i.e. let the sum of the moment about the cut equal zero and solve for the unknown
bending moment M).
If you follow this procedure for every cut/section then you will find the equation of bending moment for every segment of the
beam and therefore you can create the bending moment diagram (BMD).
M1
(x)
x
2100 N
x (m)
0 x 1.6
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
+ (2100) (x − 0) − M1 (x) = 0
M1 (x) = +2100x
2000 N
M2
(x)
x
2100 N
x (m)
0 0.4 x 1.6
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
2000 N
1200 N
M3
(x)
x
2100 N
x (m)
0 0.4 0.8 x 1.6
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
M (x) = ∫ V (x) dx
The integration method is one of the most common and simple methods to calculate the moment. This is an alternative
method
to using the method of sections/cuts as shown in the previous section of the hand calculations.
We start at the left side of the beam and we use the known value of the moment to calculate the constant of integration
in the
first moment equation, M1 (x). If there is a Fixed Support on the left side of the beam then the moment value at
x = 0 is the
value of the moment reaction. Otherwise, the value of the moment is zero at x = 0.
For all other moment equations apart from the first moment equation, the Continuity Condition is used to determine
the values of
the constants of integration.
V1 (x) = 2100
M1 (x) = ∫ (2100) dx
M1 (x) = 2100x + C
At the left side of the beam (x = 0), we know the moment value is 0 because there is NOT a Fixed Support there:
M1 (0) = 0
2100(0) + C = 0
0 +C = 0
C = 0
M1 (x) = 2100x
V2 (x) = 100
M2 (x) = ∫ (100) dx
M2 (x) = 100x + C
M1 (0.4) = M2 (0.4)
2100(0.4) = 100(0.4) + C
840 = 40 + C
C = 800
V3 (x) = −1100
M3 (x) = ∫ (−1100) dx
M3 (x) = −1100x + C
M2 (0.8) = M3 (0.8)
880 = −880 + C
C = 1760
2
d υ M (x)
=
2
dx EI
Here the internal moment M must be expressed as a function of the x coordinates that extend across the beam. The constants of
integration are obtained from the boundary conditions at the pin, roller or fixed supports:
a) For a fixed support, the boundary condition states that the beam cannot deflect or rotate. This means that both the deflection
and slope are zero at the location of the support:
θ(x) = 0
and
υ(x) = 0
b) For a pin support or roller support, the boundary condition states that the beam cannot deflect but it is free to rotate. This
means that only the deflection is zero at the location of the support:
υ(x) = 0
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M1 (x) → EI = 2100x
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (2100x) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
2100x
EI θ1 (x) = + C1
2
2
EI θ1 (x) = 1050x + C1
1
2
θ1 (x) = (1050x + C1 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ1 (x) dx = ∫ (1050x + C1 ) dx
EI
3
1 1050x
υ1 (x) = ( + C1 x + C2 )
EI 3
1 3
υ1 (x) = (350x + C1 x + C2 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
1
3
(350(0) + C1 (0) + C2 ) = 0
EI
3
350(0) + C1 (0) + C2 = 0
0 + C1 (0) + C2 = 0
0C1 + C2 = 0
C2 = 0
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M2 (x) → EI = 100x + 800
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (100x + 800) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
100x
EI θ2 (x) = + 800x + C3
2
2
EI θ2 (x) = 50x + 800x + C3
1
2
θ2 (x) = (50x + 800x + C3 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ2 (x) dx = ∫ (50x + 800x + C3 ) dx
EI
3 2
1 50x 800x
υ2 (x) = ( + + C3 x + C4 )
EI 3 2
1
3 2
υ2 (x) = (16.6667x + 400x + C3 x + C4 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M3 (x) → EI = −1100x + 1760
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (−1100x + 1760) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
−1100x
EI θ3 (x) = + 1760x + C5
2
2
EI θ3 (x) = −550x + 1760x + C5
1
2
θ3 (x) = (−550x + 1760x + C5 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ3 (x) dx = ∫ (−550x + 1760x + C5 ) dx
EI
3 2
1 −550x 1760x
υ3 (x) = ( + + C5 x + C6 )
EI 3 2
1
3 2
υ3 (x) = (−183.3333x + 880x + C5 x + C6 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
1
3 2
(−183.3333(1.6) + 880(1.6) + C5 (1.6) + C6 ) = 0
EI
3 2
−183.3333(1.6) + 880(1.6) + C5 (1.6) + C6 = 0
1501.8667 + C5 (1.6) + C6 = 0
1.6C5 + C6 = −1501.8667
1.6C5 + C6 = −1501.8667
θ1 (0.4) = θ2 (0.4)
1 1
2 2
(1050(0.4) + C1 ) = (50(0.4) + 800(0.4) + C3 )
EI EI
2 2
1050(0.4) + C1 = 50(0.4) + 800(0.4) + C3
168 + C1 = 328 + C3
C1 − C3 = 160
1 3
1 3 2
(350(0.4) + C1 (0.4)) = (16.6667(0.4) + 400(0.4) + C3 (0.4) + C4 )
EI EI
3 3 2
350(0.4) + C1 (0.4) = 16.6667(0.4) + 400(0.4) + C3 (0.4) + C4
θ2 (0.8) = θ3 (0.8)
1 2
1 2
(50(0.8) + 800(0.8) + C3 ) = (−550(0.8) + 1760(0.8) + C5 )
EI EI
2 2
50(0.8) + 800(0.8) + C3 = −550(0.8) + 1760(0.8) + C5
672 + C3 = 1056 + C5
C3 − C5 = 384
1 3 2
1 3 2
(16.6667(0.8) + 400(0.8) + C3 (0.8) + C4 ) = (−183.3333(0.8) + 880(0.8) + C5 (0.8) + C6 )
EI EI
3 2 3 2
16.6667(0.8) + 400(0.8) + C3 (0.8) + C4 = −183.3333(0.8) + 880(0.8) + C5 (0.8) + C6
Group the relevant equations to solve the values of the remaining constants:
1.6C5 + C6 = −1501.8667
C1 − C3 = 160
C3 − C5 = 384
C1 = −472
C2 = 0
C3 = −632
C4 = 21.3333
C5 = −1016
C6 = 123.7333
For 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4 :
1 2
θ1 (x) = (1050x − 472)
EI
1 3
υ1 (x) = (350x − 472x)
EI
For 0.4 ≤ x ≤ 0.8 :
1
2
θ2 (x) = (50x + 800x − 632)
EI
1 3 2
υ2 (x) = (16.6667x + 400x − 632x + 21.3333)
EI
For 0.8 ≤ x ≤ 1.6 :
1
2
θ3 (x) = (−550x + 1760x − 1016)
EI
1
3 2
υ3 (x) = (−183.3333x + 880x − 1016x + 123.7333)
EI
θ(x) = 0
For 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4 :
1
2
θ1 (x) = (1050x − 472)
EI
1
2
0 = (1050x − 472)
EI
2
0 = 1050x − 472
This equation can't be solved, so there is not a maximum in this segment of the beam.
For 0.4 ≤ x ≤ 0.8 :
1
2
θ2 (x) = (50x + 800x − 632)
EI
1
2
0 = (50x + 800x − 632)
EI
2
0 = 50x + 800x − 632
x = 0.754 is a solution to this equation, so there is a potential maximum there. Substitute it into the deflection equation:
1
3 2
υ2 (x) = (16.6667x + 400x − 632x + 21.3333)
EI
1
3 2
υ2 (0.754) = (16.6667(0.754) + 400(0.754) − 632(0.754) + 21.3333)
EI
1
υ2 (0.754) = (−220.6439)
EI
For 0.8 ≤ x ≤ 1.6 :
1
2
θ3 (x) = (−550x + 1760x − 1016)
EI
1 2
0 = (−550x + 1760x − 1016)
EI
2
0 = −550x + 1760x − 1016
This equation can't be solved, so there is not a maximum in this segment of the beam.
1
3
υ1 (x) = (350x − 472x)
EI
1
3
υ1 (0) = (350(0) − 472(0))
EI
1
υ1 (0) = (0) , so this is not a maximum and we can ignore it.
EI
1 3 2
υ3 (x) = (−183.3333x + 880x − 1016x + 123.7333)
EI
1 3 2
υ3 (1.6) = (−183.3333(1.6) + 880(1.6) − 1016(1.6) + 123.7333)
EI
1
υ3 (1.6) = (0) , so this is not a maximum and we can ignore it.
EI
−220.6439
∴ The absolute maximum deflection in the above equations is: at x = 0.754
EI