Earthing Transformer Protection Fail Analysis
Earthing Transformer Protection Fail Analysis
Abstract-The grounding transformers (GT) are intended for establishing a neutral point in three-
phase ungrounded power systems. Failure of these devices results in power transformer outage
and requires subsequent direct and indirect costs. Recently, failure of GTs in many regional
electric companies has led to numerous problems. Results show that proper performance of
protection system play an important role in preventing failure of these devices. In this paper, MV-
side E/F protection system of substations has been described and then simulation of a 63/20 kV
substation is presented. Protection system of mentioned substation has been studied practically to
evaluate its efficiency against earth faults in different locations. The simulations are carried out by
EMTP-RV and results are investigated. This task has been done via characteristic curves of E/F
relays. Finally, required tasks to prevent failure of GTs are presented. Moreover, role of resistance
tanks to detect high impedance faults and effect of earth fault events occurred in output feeders
on failure of GTs have been discussed.
1000 1000
earth fault). Fault has occurred at t=20 (ms), bus section 1000 1000
-1000 -2000
-2000 -4000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
t (ms) t (ms)
The 19th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Pilsen, Czech Republic, August, 23 – 28, 2015
than 200 A in bus1 is likely and may lead to some Comprehensive investigations in five substations yield
damages in GTs. to following preventive solutions:
1000
1- E/F relays setting in substations should be carried
out carefully in such a way to maintain the system
reliability and also the fault is cleared in the shortest
possible time. Figure (5) shows how to properlyadjust the
E/F relays to meet these goals. In this setting, first the bus
100
O/C
section E/F Relay operates and separates faulted section,
E/F
incoming1 incoming1 then the incoming E/F Relay cuts current off. E/F relays of
E/F
E/F incoming2
bussection O/C GTsact as backup. Also Iset must be set carefully. In this
incoming2
O/C
setting two factors must be considered.One is thatIset
10
bussection should be higher than the unbalanced three-phase
Time (s) current of PTsoutput feeders (incomings) and also bus
section. Second isIset should be less than GTs rated
continuous current. This consideration is due to possibility
E/F output feeders
(Bus2) of occurring high-impedance and long-lasting earth faults.
1
E/F output feeders
(Bus1)
It is noted that in TMS setting of above relays and I set, the
S.E/F
GT1
backup role of these relays should be considered. The
S.E/F GT2
important point is that parallel operation of PTsmust be
considered in setting of these relays. In parallel operation
(being closed both 20 and 63 kV bus sections) E/F Relay
0. setting of GTs must be same. This would be carried out
1 10 100 Current (A) 1000 10000
for incomings and bus sections too. In other wise, due to
current differences, their settingswill be different too. In
Figure 4: Characteristic curves ofO/CandE/Frelays in practice, unbalanced current may be greater than rated
20 kVside of studied substation continuous current. In this case, there are two solutions.
One is loads balancing or increasing GTscapacity.
(B) Earth fault in bus 2 Second is installing sensitive E/F relay (S.E/F) with
Due to the similarity of bus structures (bus 1 and 2) in definite time (DT) characteristics in GTsneutral instead of
the 20 kV substations, the analysis of this part is similar to ordinary E/F Relay.
(A). 2- Supposing earth fault current flow of Isc in output
(C) Fault occurrence in output feeders of bus 2 feeders, Isc/n passes through GTsneutral (n is number of
Setting of all E/F relays in output feeders ofbus 2is GTs). Due to this fact, E/F relays in 20 kV output feeders
80A (primary side), TMS 0.07sec and a standard inverse is set so that GTscurrent be less than continuous nominal
curves (SI). It is noteworthy that other E/F relays in rating in low-current and long-lasting faults. It is noted
substation acts as backup for these faults.However, in the that in case of high difference between feeder unbalance
occurrence of high impedance earth fault in each output and continuous current rating of GT, the feeder load
feeders with the current less than 80 A (Isc/2=40 A), E/F should be balanced.
relay of output feeders or backup E/F relays cannot detect 3- In some substations with capacitor banks, earth
fault.In permanent faults, this leads to long time current resistance is used in GTsneutral. This tank comprises of
flow to GTs. This may lead toGTswarming and water and a small amount of pure sodium carbonate.
hencemoredamages. Specification of this solution is that with increasing
(D) Fault occurrence in output feeders of bus 1 temperature, the electrical resistance of tank decreases.
Setting of all E/F relays in bus 1 output feeders is 40 A When leakage currents flowinginGTs, fluid is heated and
(primary side), TMS 0.05 sec and aninstantaneous the resistance decreases. Therefore leakage current will
characteristic of 400 A. So in normal conditions, there is increase. So Iset value can be considered a little more
no concern for GTs. Because of low settings for relays than normal in this type of substations. In addition, there
and occurrence of earth faults less than 40 A (Isc/2=20 A) is a heater in the resistance tank used to maintain fluid
is unlikely and also with respect to continuous rating of temperature constant in the winter. When the weather
GTs, damage to these devices is unlikely. gets cold in the winter (especially in cold areas), fluid may
freezes anddamages tank wall. In this situation, low
3. Practical solutions to prevent GTs failure in leakage currents through GTs neutral can’t make fluid
substations warm enough to decrease resistance and pickup relay.
Therefore measuring resistance of tank and inspection of
The 19th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Pilsen, Czech Republic, August, 23 – 28, 2015
heater and thermocouple is necessary in periodic cause damages in GTs. Protection system should be set
maintenance. in such a way to maintain the system reliability and also
4- Using recloser in 20 kV feeders causes that CB is the fault is cleared in the shortest possible time. In this
closed again in a short time after first operation. If fault regard, special attention must be paid to the extent of
remains still, GTs should pass earth fault current again so GTs rating. In this study a substation protection system
this will exacerbate thermal instability of GTs. Therefore, and possibility of GT failure has been investigated. Also,
following recommendation is proposed to reduce effects some practical solutions are proposed. How to
of reclosing on GTs: properlyadjust earth fault relays were discussed with
● allowed number of reclosing on 20 kV overhead regard reclosing schemes, resistance tanks effect on
feeders without recloser, is one time after five minutes. leakage current detection and some other points. The
● reclosing should not be done for medium voltage proposed solutions can be used to reduce the risk of
output feeders that are wholly underground or most of GTsfailure in substations.
their length is underground. In other words, the recloser
relay of thesefeeders should be disabled. 5. References
100
[1] Eduful G, Mensah G. Sizing and selection of
grounding transformers-decision criteria. In: IEEE
2011 Syst. Planning Div. Electr.Conference; 7-10
Nov2011; Accra-North, Ghana. New York, NY, USA:
IEEE. pp. 45-49.
[2] IEEE recommended practice for grounding of
E/F GT
10
industrial and commercial power systems. IEEE STD
142, 2007.
E/F incoming
[3] Hurng LJ, Jinn CW, Kuen Wu, WenJC, Yi C. Analysis
Time (s) E/F Bus Section of zigzag transformer applying in the three-phase four-
wire distribution power system. IEEE Trans. Power
Delivery 2005; 20: 1168–1173.
[4] Nelson JP. System grounding and ground fault
protection in the petrochemical industry: aneed for a
1
better understanding.IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat2002;
38: 1633–1640.
[5] Shen M, Ingratta L, Roberts G.Grounding transformers
application. In: IEEE 2008 Power and Energy Society
General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of
Iset Electrical Energy conference; 20–24 July 2008;
Mississauga. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.
[6] Peter E. Sutherland. Application of transformer ground
100
Current (A)
1000 10000 differential protection relays.IEEE Trans. Ind.
Applicat2000; 36: 16–21.
Figure 5: Propersetting oftheE/Frelays in substations [7] IEEE Standard Requirements, Terminology, and Test
Procedure for Neutral Grounding Devices.IEEE STD
●single-reclosing is allowed for overhead output 142, 1972.
feeders with active recloser relay. In order to reduce the [8] Detjen ER, Shah KR. Grounding transformer
pressure on GTs resulting from successive earth faults it applications and associated protection schemes.IEEE
is necessary to increase reclosing time of relays to more Trans. Industry applications 1992; 28: 788 - 796.
than 10 seconds. [9] LeonardL. Electric power generation,transmission, and
distribution. 5thed. ABB Power T & D Company, 2012.
4. Conclusion [10] IEEE Guide for the application of neutral grounding
Grounding transformers (GT) are primarily used for in electrical utility systems, Part IVDistribution.IEEE
detecting earth fault in delta side of substations.Improper Std C62.92.4, 1991.
settingof protection system and ignoring GTscapacity in [11] Minglin Z,Jinn AZ, Qian Z. Investigation of internal
setting of E/F relays, results in GTs failure. resonance and winding insulation stresses in
Comprehensive study on five substations in studied grounding transformer failures. In: IEEE
network revealed that settings of E/F relays in 20 kV side 2000properties and application of dielectric materials
in cases such as high-impedance long-lasting faults may
The 19th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Pilsen, Czech Republic, August, 23 – 28, 2015
conference; 21–26 June 2000; Xi'an, China. New grounded three-phase transformers. IEEE Trans. Ind.
York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 864-867. Applicat 2010; 46: 1109 - 1117
[12] Saleh SA, Rahman MA. Testing of a wavelet packet
transform-based differential protection for resistance