0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views

HW 2

some more hw

Uploaded by

Tadux
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views

HW 2

some more hw

Uploaded by

Tadux
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Math 246C Homework 2

Alan Raydan
May 13, 2019

Question 1: Let u be a C 2 solution of


 2
∂t u − 4∂x2 u = 0 in (0, ∞) × R,
u(0, x) = u0 (x), ∂t u(0, x) = u1 (x).

1. Prove that if both u0 and u1 are odd, then u is odd in x for each t.

Proof. From d’Alembert’s formula, we know the general solution is given by

1 x+2t
Z
1
u(t, x) = [u0 (x + 2t) + u0 (x − 2t)] + u1 (y) dy. (1)
2 4 x−2t

Fixing t ∈ (0, ∞), we get

1 −x+2t
Z
1
u(t, −x) = [u0 (−x + 2t) + u0 (−x − 2t)] + u1 (y) dy
2 4 −x−2t
1 x+2t
Z
1
= [−u0 (x − 2t) − u0 (x + 2t)] − u1 (y) dy
2 4 x−2t
1 x+2t
 Z 
1
=− [u0 (x + 2t) + u0 (x − 2t)] + u1 (y) dy
2 4 x−2t
= −u(t, x)

which demonstrates that u is odd in x.

2. Suppose u0 = u1 = 0 for all x ≤ 0. Find the region in (0, ∞) × R in which u(t, x) = 0,


give the reason.

Proof. In eq. (1), notice that the term u0 (x + 2t) + u0 (x − 2t) is 0 when both x ≤ −2t
and x ≤ 2t. For t ≥ 0 we have −2t ≤ 2t so both conditions are satisfied
R x+2t when x ≤ −2t.
We also have that u1 (x + 2t) = 0 whenever x ≤ −2t, so the term x−2t u1 (y) dy is also
0 in this region. There for the region in which u = 0 is graphed on the last page. This
is in keeping with the finite speed of propagation for the wave equation.

1
Question 2: Let u solve the initial value problem for the wave equation in one dimension:
 2
∂t u − ∂x2 u = 0 in (0, ∞) × R,
u(0, x) = u0 (x), ∂t u(0, x) = u1 (x).
R∞
Assume u0 and u1 have compact support. The kinetic energy of u is k(t) = −∞ |∂t u(t, x)|2 dx
R∞
and the potential energy of u is p(t) = −∞ |∂x u(t, x)|2 dx. Show
1. u(t, ·) has compact support in R for all t > 0.

Proof. Since u0 and u1 have compact support, there exist closed intervals such that
supp(u0 ) ⊂ [−a, a] and supp(u1 ) ⊂ [−b, b]. As before, the general solution to the IVP
is
1 x+t
Z
1
u(t, x) = [u0 (x + t) + u0 (x − t)] + u1 (y) dy.
2 2 x−t
Fixing t > 0, note that the function u0 (x + t) is supported in [−a + t, a + t] and
u0 (x − t) is supported in [−a − t, a − t] which implies that supp(u0 (x + t) + u0 (x − t)) ⊂
[−a − t, a + t]. Similarly, the term involving the integral is supported in [−b − t, b + t]
which demonstrates that supp(u) ⊂ [−a − t, a + t] ∪ [−b − t, b + t]. So u has compact
support for each t > 0.

2. k(t) + p(t) is constant in t.

Proof. We start by taking the derivative of k + p with respect to time to get


d ∞
Z
d
[k(t) + p(t)] = |∂t u|2 + |∂x u|2 dx
dt dt −∞
Z ∞
∂t |∂t u|2 + |∂x u|2 dx

= (the integral is convergent)
−∞
Z ∞
= 2∂t u∂t2 u + 2∂x u∂xt u dx (chain rule)
−∞
Z ∞
=2 ∂t u(∂t2 u − ∂x2 u) dx (integration by parts)
−∞
= 0,

where the final equality comes from the fact that u solves the wave equation. This
demonstrates that k + p is constant.

3. k(t) = p(t) for t sufficiently large.

Proof. We begin by investigating the behavior of the difference of k and p:


Z ∞
k(t) − p(t) = |∂t u|2 − |∂x u|2 dx
Z−∞

= (∂t u + ∂x u)(∂t u − ∂x u) dx.
−∞

2
But from the d’Alembert formula, we get that
1
∂t u(t, x) = [u00 (x + t) − u00 (x − t) + u1 (x + t) + u1 (x − t)]
2
and
1
∂x u(t, x) = [u00 (x + t) + u00 (x − t) + u1 (x + t) − u1 (x − t)].
2
Substituting this into the equation for k − p yields
Z ∞
k(t) − p(t) = [u00 (x + t) + u1 (x + t)][−u00 (x − t) + u1 (x − t)] dx. (2)
−∞

Since u0 and u1 have compact support which implies that u00 also has compact support.
As before let supp(u00 ) ⊂ [−a, a] and supp(u1 ) ⊂ [−b, b]. Without loss of generality, we
may assume b ≥ a in which case have [−a, a] ⊂ [−b, b]. It then follows that

supp[u00 (x + t) + u1 (x + t)] ⊂ [−b + t, b + t]


and
0
supp[−u0 (x − t) + u1 (x − t)] ⊂ [−b − t, b − t].

Now it suffices to let t > b so that [−b + t, b + t] ∩ [−b − t, b − t] = ∅. This implies that
whenever one factor in (2) is nonzero, the other factor must be zero. So for t > b we
have
k(t) − p(t) = 0
as desired.

Question 3: Let Ω be a bounded domain in Rn , consider the initial-boundary value


problem  2
 ∂t u + a2 (t, x)∂t u − ∆u = 0 in (0, ∞) × Ω
u(t, x) = 0 x ∈ ∂Ω
u(0, x) = u0 (x), ∂t u(0, x) = u1 (x).

Here a(t, x), u0 , and u1 are smooth functions. Prove that the L2 -norm of the solution is
bounded for any t ∈ (0, ∞).
Proof. We will begin by showing that the total energy
Z
1
e(t) = (∂t u)2 + |∇u|2 dx
2 Ω

3
is nonincreasing. We take the derivative of e to get
 Z 
d d 1 2 2
e(t) = (∂t u) + |∇u| dx
dt dt 2 Ω
Z
= ∂t u∂t2 u + ∇u · ∇∂t u dx
ZΩ
= ∂t u(∂t2 u − ∆u) dx (integration by parts)
ΩZ

= − (∂t u)2 a2 (t, x) dx



≤ 0,

which shows e is nonincreasing. This implies that


Z Z
1 2 2 1
(∂t u) + |∇u| dx = e(t) ≤ e(0) = (u1 )2 + |∇u0 |2 dx
2 Ω 2 Ω

which is finite since u0 and u1 are smooth on Ω. In particular this implies that for fixed t
we have ||∇u(t, ·)||L2 (Ω) < ∞. The desired results follows below from Poincaré’s inequality:

||u(t, ·)||L2 (Ω) ≤ C ||∇u(t, ·)||L2 (Ω) < ∞.

You might also like