Logistics Information Management
Logistics Information Management
Patricia J. Daugherty, Alexander E. Ellinger, Craig M. Gustin, (1996),"Integrated logistics: achieving logistics
performance improvements", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 1 Iss 3 pp. 25-33 http://
dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598549610155297
James S. Keebler, Richard E. Plank, (2009),"Logistics performance measurement in the supply chain: a benchmark",
Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 16 Iss 6 pp. 785-798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770911000114
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:203840 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
F
ew serious studies have attempted to The Control Cycle
analyse exactly how the logistics activity
can be measured as a whole. Management has been defined as the planning, execution
and control of goal-directed activities. Control processes are
implemented in this in the form of control cycles. A
schematic example of a control cycle is shown in Figure 1.
On the one hand, the essential stages of the control cycles
are reflected, and on the other, the conditions that are
necessary for implementation of the control cycle are shown.
• Evaluation of performance. Evaluation of The design of a control cyle consists of the establishment
performance indicators takes place by comparing of the above mentioned conditions. The order in which
planned or desired values with the corresponding this is done is as follows:
control boundaries. (1) Define objectives and structure.
• Analysis of the problems. For a good diagnosis,
experience with and insight into the process is (2) Define steering instruments.
required. (3) Make use of knowledge and experience for
• Decision to intervene. From the diagnosis made in problems analysis.
the previous stage, it can be decided whether or
(4) Fix norms and control boundaries.
not to take corrective action. This means that the
data concerning the process have to be such that (5) Define performance indicators.
expected results and costs of intervention allow for
(6) Determine measurement tools.
corrective action.
Actual execution of control activities starts with data The authors then go on to describe exactly what is meant
by performance indicators, using a transformation model
Downloaded by UNIVERSITAET OSNABRUCK At 19:10 11 February 2016 (PT)
Table I . Example of Quantities from the Logistic Sector • Number of customer orders correctly delivered
in a certain period (number and time) = real
Inputs (I) Conditional variables (T) Output (0) output.
• Number of customer orders planned to be
Material Throughput time Production delivered (number and time) in that period =
Costs Throughput time Sales
norm output.
Personnel Turnover speed Deliveries • Delivery reliability = real output/norm output
Capacity Rejects Turnover (effectiveness).
The performance indicator is expressed as a percentage
(e.g. 95 per cent). A norm with control boundaries could
• Efficiency = norm input/real input. then be 97 per cent ± 2 per cent. Graphically the
performance indicator can be presented as in Figure 4.
• Effectiveness = real output/norm output.
• Process parameter = real conditional variable. (2) The inventory level in the component warehouse
Downloaded by UNIVERSITAET OSNABRUCK At 19:10 11 February 2016 (PT)
is defined as follows:
• Productivity = real output/real input.
• Inventory (infinancialterms) at the beginning
• Utilization level = real input/norm input. of the month divided by the supplies in that
These these quantities are represented schematically in month. The performance indicator is now
Figure 3. expressed in months (e.g. two months). The
norm with control boundaries could then be two
Efficiency concerns the efforts, costs and reception of the months ± half-a-month. Graphically this
inputs when employed in the process in relation to the performance indicator can be presented as in
preliminary stated norms (reciprocal occupation rate). Figure 5.
Effectiveness concerns the amount to which the process
realizes the previously stated norms (compared with the From the enumeration of quantities as in Table I it can
actual output). be derived that a large number of performance indicators
can be defined. In this book we want to point out how
Process parameters indicate values which the quantities this can be achieved structurally. As every situation is
have that are considered to be relevant (such as inventory specific we shall present a method that may be used in
level and throughput time).
Productivity reflects the relation between the achieved
result (output) and the means used to obtain this (input).
Two examples of performance indicators are illustrated
below:
(1) Delivery reliability to customers is defined as
follows:
38 LOGISTICS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 5,3
selecting performance indicators. For clarification we (1) Validity. The measured value must represent the
conclude this book with a number of practical examples. real inventory level. For example a measurement
of the total inventory level will be invalid if the
The ensuing chapters look at the structure of logistics, warehouse inventory and the pipeline inventory are
steering instruments, setting norms, determining not measured simultaneously.
performance indicators, measurement tools, working with
performance indicators, production organization and (2) Covering potential. When a performance indicator
performance indicators, and the logistic input-output model. aims to describe the total inventory, one may not
omit to take, e.g. the pipeline inventory or
We are reminded in chapter six, on measurement tools, of subassemblies into consideration.
the purpose behind all this information-gathering activity (3) • Comparability. The units for indicating the inventory
— points which are often lost on the boffins who get carried level are not comparable if on one occasion the
away with the flashing bright lights!: inventory level is expressed in days, and on another,
in financial terms or number of products.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITAET OSNABRUCK At 19:10 11 February 2016 (PT)
Requirements for Data Collection and (4) Accuracy. The value determined for an inventory
Processing level must be so accurate and reliable that any
exceeding of the control boundaries is always
The following requirements can be made with respect to detectable. Precautions have to be taken especially
data collection and processing: if an accumulation of errors is possible. With respect
(1) Validity. Measurements must reflect actual to inventories, reliability of the recorded data is
performance. This requires a good definition of the particularly important. Not only do unreliable data
performance indicators (Chapter 5), the lead to wrong decisions, but they also lead to
measurement points and the measurements from misinterpretation of the performance indicators.
which they originate. Also the time span over which
the measurement data are valid has to be known. (5) Utility. If a certain (part of the) inventory level is
not adjustable, or very difficult to adjust (e.g. it is
(2) Covering potential. Measurements must completely outside the responsibility area), then it makes no
cover the definition of the performance indicators. sense to take measurements for that responsibility
The more completely the measurements of the area.
process quantities are represented, the better
these quantities can be evaluated. (6) Profitability. At least the costs of the installation
and maintenance of an inventory level measurement
(3) Comparability. Measurements are to be comparable system will have to be regained (in the total chain).
in dimension throughout the organization and over
subsequent points in time (premise 4, Chapter 5). The final chapter concentrates on the logistic input-output
model, which formed the nucleus of the working group's
(4) Accuracy. Sufficient precision and reliability is 1984 seminar and its subsequent research. It arose from
required of the measurements. For example, the the realization that: "all logistics activities in a company
taking of samples for inventory reliability must be need to contribute to the realization of the company's
representative of the real situation besides being objectives". This realization, of course, is not new but how
an accurate measurement. difficult it is to define, measure and provide that
"contribution" in the face of often conflicting departmental
(5) Utility. A decision maker must benefit from the
objectives and agendae. Hence, the model, described thus:
measurements done (which is the object of this
book).
(6) Compatibility. If a measurement system links up Introduction to the Model
well with the existing data organization, it will be
easier to implement. This existing data organization The logistic input-output model is a schematic
will also influence the choice between manual or representation of reality, with an operational character,
automated measurement (Section 6.5). which is expressed in:
(7) Profitability. The benefits of the measurements • The possibility to analyse the logistic activities with
must exceed the costs. the help of the model and their influence on the
corporate objectives.
NB: Beware of striving for too much precision (too detailed • The possibility to increase insight into the
and expensive!).
coherence of the logistic activities by means of the
model.
How the above-mentioned requirements affect the
performance indicators can be illustrated with an example Concretely, this means that the model has the following
about the inventory level: functional specification:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN LOGISTICS 39
By horizontal intersection of a process level, relations can For a complete representation of the company, it is
be established between the physicalflowand the matching necessary to include the data for those departments not
operational costs and capital invested. Especially between considered in the process as one block under "others
physical units and operational costs, relations can be company". In this block also the items "allocated" as
established in the following two ways: identified in the budgets are to be included. With this
division, simulation becomes feasible, because all variable
• Calculation of the necessary means based on the costs vary with quantities, and the fixed costs remain
nature and size of the expected physical flow and the unchanged or drop out entirely (if the activity is
performance norms proposed (e.g. hours/ piece). eliminated). In order to fill in the columns, belonging to
• Calculation of the performance realized based on the the physical flows, the following can be stated:
real physical flow and the real means utilized.
• The process must be indicated with all branches
This implies that the logistic input-output model can also (e.g. work put out to contract, service deliveries).
be applied for normative calculation based on performance
norms. • The flows have to be indicated in quantitites and
price equivalents.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITAET OSNABRUCK At 19:10 11 February 2016 (PT)
1. Claudine A. Soosay, Ross L. Chapman. 2006. An empirical examination of performance measurement for managing
continuous innovation in logistics. Knowledge and Process Management 13:10.1002/kpm.v13:3, 192-205. [CrossRef]
Downloaded by UNIVERSITAET OSNABRUCK At 19:10 11 February 2016 (PT)