2021 AG Report To The PEI Legislative Assembly
2021 AG Report To The PEI Legislative Assembly
2021
Table of Contents
CHAPTER PAGE
Introduction
Previous Recommendations
9. Follow-up on Performance Audits 2017 and 2018 .............................................89
10. Follow-up with Treasury Board ........................................................................113
Financial Audits
11. Introduction to Financial Audits .......................................................................117
12. Indicators of Financial Condition .....................................................................120
13. Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements ...............................................140
14. Issues Noted in Other Financial Audits ............................................................150
15. Appropriations and Special Warrants ...............................................................154
INTRODUCTION
REPORT OVERVIEW
The Audit Act requires the Auditor General to report annually to the
Legislative Assembly.
SUMMARY COMMENTS
The Office of the Auditor General of Prince Edward has a long history of
serving Islanders. We conduct independent audits and examinations that
provide objective information, advice and assurance to the Legislative
Assembly. We promote accountability and best practices in government
operations.
The Office serves Members of the Legislative Assembly with integrity and
independence, which is the foundation of our work. We strive to make a
positive difference for Islanders.
Lastly, I would like to thank the staff of the Office of the Auditor General
of Prince Edward Island for welcoming me with such great support and
enthusiasm.
APERÇU DU RAPPORT
L’Audit Act (loi sur la vérification des comptes publics) stipule que le
vérificateur général doit déposer un rapport devant l’Assemblée législative
tous les ans.
COMMENTAIRES SOMMAIRES
1.3 The Audit Act provides the Office with the authority to conduct
audits and examinations of provincial departments, Crown corporations,
agencies, and funds. Financial audits include the Province’s consolidated
financial statements, as well as various other financial statement audits.
Special audits and examinations conducted by our Office include
performance audits, which may sometimes be referred to as value-for-
money audits.
1.4 In accordance with the Audit Act, the Auditor General reports at
least annually to the Legislative Assembly. The annual report
1.6 The Audit Act was amended in July 2020, which expanded the
authority of the Auditor General in conducting audits and examinations,
and in reporting to the Legislative Assembly. These amendments include:
the Auditor General may now conduct work within organizations outside
of government, that have received government funding, and the Office
may report to the Legislative Assembly more than once per year. It is
anticipated that the frequency of reporting by the Auditor General will
increase in the future.
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
1.14 The Accounting Standards Board and the Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board establish the accounting and assurance standards which
apply to public sector entities and our work. In conducting our work, we
rely on these standards as well as guidance provided by the Chartered
Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada) and other authoritative
sources.
1.16 The Office also participates in the CCOLA peer review process for
financial statement audits and performance audits and examinations. This
peer review process provides additional assurance that the Office is
conducting audits in compliance with the applicable standards of CPA
Canada. The peer review process also exposes our Office to practices and
methodologies of other offices, which assists in improving our
professional practices.
• the Office and staff comply with professional standards, regulatory and
legal requirements, and internal policies; and
• the reports issued are appropriate in the circumstances.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
1.20 Exhibit 1.1 provides a summary of the value and benefits provided
by a Legislative Audit Office to the Legislative Assembly and the public.
EXHIBIT 1.1
THE VALUE AND BENEFITS OF A LEGISLATIVE AUDIT OFFICE
Better scrutiny of
Increased productivity Government performance
2.2 The Auditor General’s Annual Report and other reports to the
Legislative Assembly, are referred to the Committee for review and
consideration. The Committee may request the Auditor General and other
witnesses to appear and answer questions on matters raised in the reports.
The Auditor General met with the Committee on several occasions in
2020 to complete the review of the 2020 Annual Report.
2.3 During the year, the Committee has been very active in following
up with Crown corporations, agencies, funds and departments, on their
progress with the implementation of the recommendations of the Auditor
General. This is a critical component of making positive improvements to
government operations.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
3.3 Under the Audit Act, the Auditor General must conduct any audits
or examinations requested by Executive Council. In addition, the Office
may receive a request from the Public Accounts Committee or the
Legislative Audit Committee. These are completed at the discretion of the
Auditor General.
3.4 On April 10, 2020, the Honorable Dennis King requested the
Auditor General, under Section 14(d) of the Audit Act, to undertake a
special assignment to examine Government’s COVID-19 pandemic
response. In particular, “a financial examination of the provincial
government COVID-19 programming and supports and the special
warrants associated with COVID-19 for the period starting March 13,
2020, with a report back to Executive Council no later than August 1,
2021”.
3.5 Due to the special COVID-19 request, the Office of the Auditor
General of Prince Edward Island was required to defer two previously
scheduled performance audits. The demands that the COVID-19 special
examination placed on our staff resources, resulted in this annual report
only including chapters for a performance audit completed for the Prince
Edward Island International Student Program and for a survey related to
governance sent to a number of Crown corporations. Previously
scheduled performance audits related to Crown Lands and Property Tax
Arrears will be reported on in the future.
3.10 During the implementation stage, the auditor gathers sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence using various audit procedures, such as
interviewing key personnel, reviewing documentation and legislation,
analyzing data and information, and testing samples of files. Audit
evidence is evaluated and assessed against the criteria established in the
planning phase. Audit findings are identified and discussed with
management.
3.11 During the reporting phase, a draft audit report is prepared, which
includes audit conclusions, audit findings, and recommendations. The
draft audit report is discussed with senior management responsible for the
subject matter of the audit. At the conclusion of the audit, a final draft
report is provided to the organization subject to audit, and we request a
written response from management to each recommendation. These
responses are included in our final report.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
What we found
BACKGROUND
1
This amount includes university programs.
Source: Building on Success: International Education Strategy 2019-2024 - Global Affairs Canada.
Canadian residency permit. Once the permit is received, the students are
no longer considered affiliated with the PEIISP, and can register and
attend PEI schools without having to pay tuition fees.
4.5 The PEIISP falls under the Department of Education and Lifelong
Learning. It was initially managed by the section English as an Additional
Language (EAL), but in 2019 an International Education Section was
established which now manages the PEIISP. The International Education
Section also manages the Affiliated Schools Program, but this program is
not included in the scope of our audit. Exhibit 4.1 shows the primary
positions involved in the management and delivery of the PEIISP.
EXHIBIT 4.1
MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY OF THE
PEI INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAM
AS AT JUNE 30, 2020
Department of Education
and Lifelong Learning
Minister
Deputy
Minister
Educational
Services
Division
International
EAL/FAL
Education
Section
Section
Director of
International
Education
Coordinator of
Administrative
International
Assistant
Education
Source: Excerpt adapted from the Department of Education and Lifelong Learning organizational
chart
4.8 The number of PEIISP students had been increasing over the last
several years, primarily due to immigration. Tuition and application fees
paid by international students are included in the revenues of the
Department, and are currently prescribed by the Education Act Student
Regulations as $10,600 for a full school year or $5,300 per semester.
Exhibit 4.2 depicts the number of fee paying, non-resident students and
the estimated revenue over the last six years.
EXHIBIT 4.2
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING
INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
PEI INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAM
Estimated
Revenue 2 329 789 1,061 1,713 1,751 1,488
($000s)
1
Based on school year-end
2
Based on the fiscal year-ends and estimated using Government’s financial information
4.16 Since its inception, there have been changes to the management
structure of the PEIISP, as well as to applicable legislation. There have
been actions taken in an attempt to develop strategic direction for the
PEIISP. These actions included requests to Treasury Board to establish a
separate corporation for international education in 2011, to the forming of
an interdepartmental task force to make recommendations for the future of
the program in 2015. As of the date of this audit report, there is no
documented and approved strategic plan for the PEIISP. Exhibit 4.3
provides a summary timeline that outlines key events which impacted the
PEIISP from 2010 to 2020.
EXHIBIT 4.3
PEI INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAM
TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS
Recommendation
Recommendation
4.27 All files examined, with the exception of one, contained letters of
acceptance issued by PEIISP to the applicant; however, 47 percent of
these files were either missing key documentation or the documentation in
the files was expired. Examples of the missing or expired documentation
included proof of health insurance and immigration status.
Recommendations
4.31 PEIISP tuition fees were not always collected on a timely basis.
The PEIISP did not apply interest or late fees, and there is no policy
guidance for staff on what actions to take when payments are outstanding.
Applications Fees 4.32 The PEIISP charges an application fee of $275 for processing
applications. From our sample of applicants, we examined files to
determine whether application fees were collected prior to issuance of
letters of acceptance in accordance with established processes. In 13
percent of the sample files, there was no documentation in the application
file to support whether the application fee had been collected.
Management subsequently provided documentation for all but one
application fee.
4.33 Processes for remitting application fees and tuition payments are
posted on the PEIISP website. We expected collection of application and
tuition fees to be made in accordance with these processes and proper
documentation would be maintained in the files.
4.35 The PEIISP does not have policy guidance for staff on what
actions to take when payments are outstanding. Management informed us
that requests for payments are sent when amounts are overdue. Collection
of payments in a timely manner helps to ensure that appropriate
consideration has been received for education services provided.
Recommendation
Education Agents 4.38 Education agents offer education advisory services to international
students and their parents or guardians. Education agents direct
applications to the PEIISP and are paid a 15 percent commission, based on
tuition fees collected by the program.
Recommendations
4.48 Management confirmed that the PEIISP does not follow any of the
homestay standards of practice listed in Appendix E. PEIISP
management informed us that they do not have any direct involvement
with the management or operations of homestay providers or host
families. As a result, there is no screening or monitoring of homestay
arrangements for PEIISP students. This is not in accordance with CAPS-I
Standards of Practice.
Recommendations
Information 4.56 Until April 1, 2019, the PEIISP was managed by the EAL Section
Systems of the Department. As a result, the student data for the program is
recorded within a database that was developed specifically for the EAL
Section. The database records key information of the PEIISP, such as:
4.57 We did not audit the database used by the International Student
Program; however, management informed us that it is difficult to
segregate and retrieve reports from the database specifically for PEIISP
students. As a result, staff within PEIISP created an internal tracking
document to have more readily accessible information. However, we were
informed that this document had limited internal controls, and
management and staff were not regularly reviewing information to ensure
completeness and accuracy.
4.58 Management advised that neither the tracking sheet nor database,
could easily provide key management reports, such as outstanding tuition
fees. To obtain this information, staff are required to manually sort and
review information from both systems, which takes a significant amount
of time and is prone to human error. Timely and reliable information is
essential for management to make effective decisions and report on
results.
4.60 Annual reports for the Department and Public Schools Branch are
being issued; however, the annual reports contain very limited reporting
on the PEIISP. Given its impact on the Island school system, it is
important that key program information specific to the PEIISP be
regularly reported to the public.
Recommendations
Student Monitoring 4.64 For the 2019-2020 Island school year, there were 137 PEIISP
and Feedback students. The PEIISP students were enrolled in and attended 14 different
schools across PEI. These students and their families are the customers of
the PEIISP and the success of the program relies on the satisfaction of
these customers. Therefore, we expected management of the PEIISP to
monitor and gather feedback from its students.
Recommendation
CONCLUSION
4.68 The PEIISP has operated for approximately ten years without a
documented or approved strategic plan. Although there have been several
initiatives to establish strategic direction for the PEIISP, as of the date of
our audit report, there is no documented or approved long-term strategic
plan for the PEIISP. Draft business plans have been developed for the
PEIISP over the years, but have not been implemented or approved.
4.69 Formally documented and approved internal policies have not been
developed for the PEIISP. Posted procedures for such things as language
proficiency testing were not consistently followed.
4.70 As well, we noted student application files did not always contain
key supporting documentation or that the documentation on file had
expired. There was also no evidence that a quality control process was
conducted on application files.
4.71 There is no policy guidance for staff on what actions to take when
payments for tuition are outstanding. As a result, PEIISP tuition fees were
not always collected on a timely basis, and there was no interest or late
payment fees applied to outstanding balances.
4.73 The PEIISP does not screen or monitor the homestay arrangements
for its students. Also, the PEIISP does not have agreements with
homestay providers, which is not in accordance with CAPS-I Standards of
Practice.
4.74 Student data for the PEIISP is recorded in a database designed for
the EAL Section; however, timely and relevant information from this
database is difficult for management of the PEIISP to obtain. Although
regular meetings are being held with senior management, documentation
of key decisions is not maintained. Also, public reporting on the program
is very limited.
4.75 The PEIISP does not monitor or gather feedback from students to
assess student satisfaction with the PEI International Student Program.
APPENDIX A
Page 1 of 4
APPENDIX A
Page 2 of 4
There are also useful statistics on the homepage that give a quick
snapshot of district receivables, paid and owing, as well as expense
tracking.
APPENDIX A
Page 3 of 4
APPENDIX A
Page 4 of 4
APPENDIX B
Page 1 of 2
STANDARDS This independent assurance report was prepared by the Office of the
Auditor General of Prince Edward Island. The purpose of this audit is to
independently conclude on whether the Department of Education and
Lifelong Learning (the Department) complies in all significant respects
with the applicable criteria. The Department accepted responsibility for
the subject matter under audit.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Department of
Education and Lifelong Learning (the Department) has processes to
effectively manage the Prince Edward Island International Student
Program (PEIISP).
APPENDIX B
Page 2 of 2
SCOPE AND The scope period of our audit was April 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020. We
APPROACH examined documentation outside that period as necessary.
APPENDIX C
AUDIT CRITERIA
1. The Department has a long-term strategic plan as well as documented policies for the
PEIISP.
2. The Department administers the PEIISP in accordance with approved policies and
general best practice.
3. The Department has accountability mechanisms established for the PEIISP for effective
monitoring and reporting on the results of the program.
APPENDIX D
The following highlights some of the key similarities and differences between the international
student programs in Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
1
Sourced from CAPS-I
2
Includes orientation fees
3
PEI does not distinguish between non-resident program and non-resident immigration students. Therefore, all
students in the PEIISP program are included for comparison basis.
APPENDIX E
Page 1 of 2
1
Sourced from CAPS-I Standards of Practice
APPENDIX E
Page 2 of 2
1
Sourced from CAPS-I Standards of Practice
What we found
• 28 percent did not receive an orientation when they joined the board;
• 50 percent felt more training was needed for board members;
• 50 percent of boards do not set time aside to deal with strategic
planning issues;
• 88 percent either did not have an IT strategic plan, or were unsure if
one had been developed for their board;
• 24 percent were not satisfied with how often the responsible Minister
meets directly with the board;
• 16 percent felt their board does not do a good job of reporting
organizational performance publicly;
• 30 percent did not sign a conflict of interest declaration when they
joined the board;
• 76 percent of respondents indicated their board either did not have, or
they were unsure if they had, an audit committee;
Each Crown corporation and its board of directors is unique in its size,
structure, mission, and level of independence from the responsible
government department. Users of this report should consider the results of
the survey and how the results might impact the practices and needs of
each individual Crown corporation and its board.
BACKGROUND
5.1 In its simplest form, the term governance refers to the act of
overseeing the control and direction of an organization. In practice,
governance of an organization is much broader. It includes the structures,
systems and practices that an organization uses for establishing its
strategic direction, overseeing its service delivery, and reporting on its
performance. Exhibit 5.1 summarizes the five basic principles of good
governance.
EXHIBIT 5.1
PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
EXHIBIT 5.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors
(Oversight Body)
Oversight
Accountability
Communication
Information
of information
provided
needs
Management
(Accountable Body)
Source: Adapted from Practice Guide to Auditing Oversight, Canadian Audit & Accountability
Foundation
EXHIBIT 5.3
FISCAL EXPENSES
YEAR ENDING MARCH 31, 2020
($000)
56%
44% $1,297,456
$1,012,677
Source: Derived from Public Accounts of the Province of PEI Volume I Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended March 31, 2020.
5.6 Engage PEI oversees the recruitment and appointment process for
boards of directors for Crown corporations in the province. It is
administered by staff of the Executive Council Office.
SURVEY RESULTS
Board 5.12 Board orientation helps each board member understand the role of
Orientation the board and its committees, as well as the expectation of individual
board members. A board should always provide the guidance necessary to
assist new board members in understanding the nature and operations of
the organization.
Board Orientation
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
Board Training
Agree Neutral/ Disagree
Neither
Recommendation
STRATEGIC 5.16 The board of directors is responsible for setting the strategic
PLANNING direction of an organization. It is important to have the strategic plan
documented to ensure all parties, including all board members, have an
understanding of the goals of the organization, and how the goals align
with the organization’s mandate. Once a strategic plan is completed, it
should be reviewed and updated regularly.
Strategic Planning
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
IT Strategic Plan
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
Recommendations
BOARD 5.23 Board accountability occurs when the board takes responsibility
ACCOUNTABILITY for the activities of the entity, and reports the results to the stakeholders of
the organization. Transparency is a key value in the public sector and it is
important that Crown corporations demonstrate high ethical behaviour,
given that they are utilizing public monies. Transparent public reporting
of such items as strategic plans, annual reports, audited financial
statements, and other accountability information is important to obtaining
and maintaining public trust and confidence.
Board Accountability
Agree Neutral/Neither Disagree
Recommendation
CONFLICT 5.25 Board members are obligated to act in the best interests of the
OF organization. Individual board members have additional responsibilities
INTEREST beyond sitting on an organization’s board, such as jobs, relationships, or
investments. These additional responsibilities could lead to either an
actual or perceived conflict of interest. It is important that policies be
implemented to reduce the risk of conflicts of interest arising, and that
these policies be communicated to board members and to the staff of the
organization.
Conflict of Interest
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
Audit Committees
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
Evaluation of CEO
Agree Neither/Neutral Disagree
Recommendation
5.32 Evaluations are a helpful tool to aid in the performance and growth
of an individual, group of people, or an organization. They offer feedback
and give an opportunity for reflection and goal setting. They are most
effective when they are transparent on the scope of the evaluation and are
done periodically. As a result, boards who partake in regular evaluations
are seen to be more successful.
Board Evaluations
Yes No Unsure
Recommendation
APPENDIX A
Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX A
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX B
GOVERNANCE SURVEY
CROWN CORPORATIONS INCLUDED
DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION
PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation
Agriculture and Land
PEI Grain Elevators Corporation
Finance PEI
Atlantic Technology Centre Inc.
100417 PEI Inc.
PEI Infrastructure Inc.
Innovation PEI
FTC Enterprise Ltd.
Island Investment Development Inc.
Economic Growth, Tourism and Culture
PEI Century 2000 Fund
Slemon Park Corporation
PEI Museum and Heritage Foundation
Charlottetown Area Development Corporation
Harbourside Management Services Inc.
Summerside Regional Development Corporation
Tourism PEI
Education and Lifelong Learning PEI Student Financial Assistance Corporation
Environment, Water and Climate Change PEI Advisory Council on the Status of Women
PEI Lotteries Commission
PEI Liquor Control Commission
Finance
PEI Cannabis Management Corporation
PEI Self-Insurance and Risk Management Fund
PEI Employment Development Agency
Fisheries and Communities
PEI Marine Science Organization
Health and Wellness Health PEI
Justice and Public Safety PEI Human Rights Commission
Social Development and Housing PEI Housing Corporation
PEI Crown Building Corporation
PEI Energy Corporation
Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy
PEI Renewable Energy Corporation
Island Waste Management Corporation
Environmental Industrial Services Inc.
APPENDIX C
GOVERNANCE SURVEY
METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE
We identified 32 Crown corporations to participate in the survey. We requested the listing of
board members from Treasury Board which identified 117 board members, some of who sit on
multiple boards. The survey took respondents approximately one hour to complete.
The questions in the survey were a combination of rating scales, order ranking and multiple
choice. Where necessary, based on the question, there were areas to provide comments. The
options for rating scales were as follows:
• Strongly Disagree
• Disagree
• Neutral/Neither
• Agree
• Strongly Agree
For reporting purposes, responses indicating agree and strongly agree were combined for a total
percentage in agreement. Similarly, answers of disagree and strongly disagree were also
combined. Respondents were directed to choose neutral/neither if that was the appropriate
answer, or if they felt the question did not apply to their board.
Crown corporations excluded from our survey met the following criteria:
- Crown corporations within the GBE not governed by a board of directors; and
- board of directors which fulfill an administrative, advisory or tribunal role.
APPENDIX D
Page 1 of 19
The purpose of this survey is to examine public sector governance in Prince Edward Island from the
perspective of current board members and senior management of Crown corporations. This survey will
examine board governance practices currently being utilized in the public sector, explore aspects that
serve to enhance effective governance, as well as identify common challenges for the future.
This survey is NOT an evaluation of your Board. It has been designed to obtain your opinion
and views on a wide variety of governance issues related to serving on a public sector Board of
Directors.
All responses will be amalgamated and reported at the aggregate level only. Neither your
views nor any information about any particular Board will be disclosed.
Not all questions may apply to your board’s particular situation. Further, there are many
governance challenges specific to some public sector Boards that cannot be dealt with within this
survey. If desired, please do not hesitate to add commentary on such matters in the General
Comments section at the end of the survey. Also, use the General Comments section if you wish
to provide further explanations regarding any question, or feel there is an area that is
relevant that has not been covered in our survey.
Yes, it is possible to start the survey and complete it at a later time. However, you will need to
complete the hold page in order to save and continue later.
Each participant is only required to participate in the survey once. Therefore, if you sit on
several boards, please identify which Board you choose to respond for at the beginning of
the survey.
APPENDIX D
Page 2 of 19
If you have questions or concerns with respect to this survey at any time, please do not hesitate to
contact the Office of the Auditor General.
Please indicate which board you are completing the survey for:
APPENDIX D
Page 3 of 19
The following are a series of general statements about public sector board governance. Please indicate
the extent to which you agree or disagree with each statement by selecting the number that most closely
reflects your opinion. If the question is not applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. Our Chairperson ensures the business of the Board is being appropriately
0 2 8 44 46
conducted.
2. Our Chairperson sets a professional business and ethical tone. 0 0 6 40 54
3. In this organization, there are too many external barriers to being an
12 52 22 10 4
effective Board.
4. Public pressure sometimes forces our Board to make decisions we would
28 54 12 4 2
not otherwise make.
5. The public does not adequately understand the mandate of this organization
6 16 32 38 8
and the issues it faces.
6. As a Board member of this organization, I feel pressure from too many
36 46 14 2 2
groups with conflicting views.
7. I believe this Board is carrying out its governance responsibilities effectively. 0 6 4 50 40
8. Our Board has the authority required to govern this organization effectively. 0 6 16 54 24
9. Board members vary in terms of whose interests they feel they must
represent on the Board, and in some cases, Board members are
appointed to represent more than one interest.
Primary Secondary Third
From the list below, please indicate the primary interest that
Interest Interest Interest
you feel you represent on this Board by placing the number “1”
beside the item. Then, if necessary, place a “2” and “3” beside
the next two interests you feel you represent on this Board.
%
A geographic region or specific community. 14 11 9
A political party and/or the Minister. 2 9 3
A particular special interest or stakeholder group. 8 9 12
The organization itself. 18 13 24
The clients/users of the organization’s services. 20 22 21
The employees and staff of the organization. 2 18 12
The citizens and taxpayers of Prince Edward Island as a whole. 36 18 18
Other? For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this
report.
Yes No N/A
%
10. Board members are provided with relevant Acts, regulations and by-laws. 90 6 4
APPENDIX D
Page 4 of 19
The following is a list of possible responsibilities that the Board of Directors may fulfill. On a scale of 1
to 5 in the first column, please indicate how important you feel each responsibility is for a well-
performing Board of your organization. In the second column, please indicate how effective you feel
your Board currently is in performing each of these responsibilities. If the question is not applicable,
please select ‘3’.
IMPORTANCE EFFECTIVENESS
Board Responsibilities (1 = Completely Unimportant (1=Completely Ineffective
5=Extremely Important) 5=Extremely Effective)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
% %
1. Setting the strategic direction/priorities for the
0 0 10 28 62 2 4 30 38 26
organization.
2. Setting the significant policies by which the
0 0 8 40 52 4 4 22 38 32
organization operates.
3. Ensuring government’s policies, regulations, and/or
0 4 8 42 46 0 4 20 32 44
directives are implemented.
4. Monitoring achievement of Board’s strategic
0 0 6 44 50 0 12 14 38 36
objectives.
5. Approving all significant business decisions for the
0 2 6 44 48 0 4 18 42 36
organizations.
6. Selecting and retaining the CEO. 4 4 22 20 50 6 6 30 22 36
7. Evaluating the performance of the CEO. 4 2 14 26 54 8 12 28 20 32
8. Bringing an external perspective to the organization’s
0 0 8 54 38 0 6 18 44 32
attention.
9. Ensuring the financial resources of the organization
0 0 4 28 68 0 0 12 48 40
are managed in a prudent manner.
10. Ensuring effective IT systems are in place. 4 14 28 30 24 4 10 46 28 12
11. Ensuring effective internal control mechanisms are in
0 2 2 44 52 2 6 14 42 36
place.
12. Collaborating effectively with external stakeholders
0 0 10 48 42 2 6 22 42 28
and organizations.
13. Advocating on behalf of the organization, as required. 2 0 18 44 36 2 2 32 38 26
14. Ensuring all accountability obligations are met. 0 0 2 32 66 2 2 16 30 50
15. Providing input/advice to the Minister on issues that
0 4 6 44 46 8 4 12 42 34
affect the organizations.
16. Others? (Please specify): For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are
not disclosed in this report.
Yes No Unsure
%
17. This Board has a mission statement. 54 8 38
APPENDIX D
Page 5 of 19
The following series of statements discusses the appointment process for public sector Boards of
Directors. If the question is not applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. The current composition of board members brings the necessary
2 16 14 42 26
skills and experience to lead this organization effectively.
2. The length of a Board member’s term of service is appropriate. 2 4 16 62 16
3. New Board members are appropriately oriented to the Board when
6 14 18 40 22
appointed.
4. In appointing members, the government consults with us on
4 20 54 14 8
required qualifications and skills.
5. We have identified the skill sets required on this Board and when
vacancies arise, we provide government a list of preferred skills in 4 18 46 20 12
future members.
6. I feel I have been provided with enough training opportunities to
2 16 26 42 14
help me do the governance job required.
7. I often rely on the expertise (financial, legal, industry, IT, etc.) of
10 16 26 38 10
other board members in making my decisions.
8. New board members are not required to fully participate for the first
16 40 40 4 0
year they are on the Board.
9. Government should provide greater governance training/capacity
0 10 40 44 6
building opportunities for public sector board members.
10. We do not have the resources to provide board member training or
6 30 36 22 6
attendance at industry-specific or governance conferences.
11. Most Board members would not take the time to attend industry-
16 42 36 6 0
specific or governance training/conferences.
12. Some board members have been on this Board for too long. 14 56 26 4 0
13. This Board has had an excessive amount of turnover. 18 44 34 4 0
14. It takes too long to fill vacant Board positions when they arise. 10 32 36 16 6
15. There are members of this Board who are not qualified to be on the
24 46 24 2 4
Board of this organization.
16. Overall, I am satisfied with the current method of appointing new
2 14 26 50 8
members to this Board.
17. Any comments/suggestions with respect to the appointment process for public sector Board members?
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
18. The following is a list of characteristics that board members may bring to their role. On a scale from
1 to 5 please indicate how important each characteristic is to a well-performing Board for your
organization. In the second column, please indicate the extent to which these characteristics are
represented by the current members on this Board. If the question is not applicable, please select ‘3’.
APPENDIX D
Page 6 of 19
IMPORTANCE EXTENT
Board Member Characteristics (1 = Completely Unimportant (1=Very Low Extent
5=Extremely Important) 5=High Extent)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
% %
a) Experience in a related industry or sector 0 6 18
32 44 2 4 34 32 28
b) Knowledge of government and public sector 2 16 12
42 28 2 2 50 30 16
c) Representative of community
0 4 10 50 36 0 8 20 54 18
demographics/diversity
d) Prior Board experience 6 18 28 32 16 2 8 26 44 20
e) Representative of a special interest or
6 18 40 28 8 4 10 52 24 10
stakeholder group
f) Financial expertise (CPA, etc.) 2 24 20 42 12 2 16 36 34 12
g) General business/management expertise 0 8 24 48 20 2 6 22 54 16
h) Legal expertise 4 20 30 30 16 12 22 32 26 8
i) IT expertise 16 22 46 14 2 14 26 42 14 4
j) Known political affiliation 52 20 24 2 2 32 16 44 2 6
k) Leadership skills 2 6 4 40 48 4 2 6 52 36
l) Representative of community values/ethics 0 0 18 46 36 0 4 18 50 28
m) Other? For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this
report.
19. In future appointments, what member skills/characteristics would best enhance your Board’s
functioning? (list up to 3)
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
20. How long have you been a member of this Board? # of Years: 2.9 (average)
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
Yes No Unsure
%
21. Did you have other public sector Board experience prior to being
56 38 6
appointed to this Board?
22. After your appointment as Board member, did you receive an orientation? 58 28 14
Somewhat
Useful
Useful
Useful
Very
Not
%
If YES, how useful to you was the orientation provided? 78 22 0
APPENDIX D
Page 7 of 19
23. Any suggestions for improvement to the orientation process for new Board members?
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
24. What further training opportunities, if any, do you think should be provided to public sector Board
members?
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
This series of statements asks about the information your Board utilizes in decision-making. If the
question is not applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. Information currently provided to the Board:
a. has an appropriate level of detail. 0 6 6 52 36
b. is a complete and fair representation of all facts. 0 6 6 56 32
c. is received in a timely manner for effective decision-making. 0 12 8 52 28
d. provides historical context to the issues being discussed. 0 12 14 54 20
e. gives future-oriented perspectives to the issues being
2 8 20 52 18
discussed.
f. explains any significant issues, changes or problems which
0 6 14 58 22
affect the organization.
g. monitors performance and progress against plan. 4 16 22 42 16
h. allows the Board to make decisions on the efficient and
0 8 8 58 26
effective use of the organization’s resources.
i. is balanced, presenting both the positive and negative impact of
0 6 16 58 20
a particular decision.
2. Information that I am receiving is sufficient to enable me to
0 4 12 56 28
participate in the decision-making of the Board.
3. The Board assesses its information needs on a regular basis. 0 8 20 54 18
4. The amount of material that needs to be reviewed before Board
2 56 24 16 2
meetings is sometimes overwhelming.
5. Information provided to this Board is understandable without being
0 0 16 68 16
over-simplified.
6. In making decisions, I am provided with several alternative courses
2 12 30 46 10
of action from which to select.
7. I rarely ask for information beyond that provided to the Board. 4 36 30 26 4
APPENDIX D
Page 8 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
8. Our CEO does a good job of advising the Board about issues or
0 4 26 40 30
challenges being faced by the organization.
9. Senior management provides most information orally at meetings. 4 22 32 30 12
10. Performance information provided to the Board by management is
0 10 20 56 14
relevant and in a form that helps us with decision-making.
11. The Board often refers to the strategic plan in making its decisions. 8 14 34 32 12
12. This Board discusses the goals and mandate of this organization on
4 12 18 46 20
a regular basis.
13. The Minister and/or Department provides the organization with
0 12 36 40 12
appropriate information for this Board to do an adequate job.
14. Our Board receives information from the Minister/Department in a
0 14 46 28 12
timely fashion.
15. I am generally satisfied with the information I receive from the
0 10 44 36 10
Minister/Department with respect to this organization.
16. Decisions sometimes have to be deferred or delayed due to lack of
4 34 36 26 0
information.
17. We often challenge the assumptions and rationale behind the
2 30 44 22 2
recommendations being made by management.
18. We almost always agree with management’s recommendations. 0 12 40 44 4
19. I sometimes feel decisions are pre-made prior to the Board meeting. 16 42 24 12 6
20. On occasion, I have felt that the Board was pressured to make a
14 50 22 14 0
decision too quickly.
21. We sometimes are required to make an immediate decision on
10 40 24 26 0
information that is received at the meeting itself.
22. Board is provided with sufficient financial reporting from
0 2 10 58 30
management.
23. The Board receives regular reports on finances/budgets that are
0 6 8 54 32
clear to me.
24. Financial information provided to the Board allows us to fairly
0 6 14 52 28
assess organizational performance.
25. I sometimes feel that we do not have enough time to discuss
10 60 14 14 2
financial/budget issues.
26. I am satisfied with the information the Board receives on IT-related
0 10 46 36 8
matters.
27. This Board obtains external advice or professional expertise when
0 4 28 58 10
needed.
28. Overall, I am satisfied with the amount of external information
2 4 20 60 14
received by the Board.
29. Overall, this Board is presented with the appropriate information for
0 6 8 60 26
decision making.
APPENDIX D
Page 9 of 19
30. What improvement would you like to see in pre-meeting There were 68 responses in
information? (check all that apply) total to this question
%
Better identification of important issues 15
More data on issues 9
Better Agenda 4
More concise descriptions of issues 7
More timely delivery of materials 12
Elimination of irrelevant materials 3
No changes needed 47
Other? For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by
3
respondents are not disclosed in this report.
Yes No Unsure
%
31. Does this Board use other information sources to provide information
to it, independent from the reports it receives from senior
management of the organization?
26 38 36
If YES, please specify: For confidentiality purposes, any comments
provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
Yes No Unsure
%
32. Is there any information you would like to receive but are not
currently receiving from senior management of the organization?
8 69 23
If YES, please specify: For confidentiality purposes, any comments
provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
APPENDIX D
Page 10 of 19
Yes No Unsure
%
1. Does your Board have an audit committee: 24 38 38
Complete the rest of this section ONLY if an Audit Committee exists.
The following questions were answered by the respondents who indicated that their Board has an audit
committee.
# Members:
For confidentiality purposes, any
2. How many members on your Audit Committee (including
comments provided by
Committee Chair)?
respondents are not disclosed in
this report.
# Financial:
For confidentiality purposes, any
3. How many members of your Audit Committee have financial
comments provided by
expertise (CPA, etc.)?
respondents are not disclosed in
this report.
Quarterly
Annually
Per Year
Other
Twice
%
4. How many times per year does your Audit Committee meet? 0 33 67 0
Yes No Unsure
%
5. Audit Committee meetings are sufficient in length to adequately
75 17 8
fulfill its responsibilities.
6. The Audit Committee reports regularly to the Board. 92 8 0
7. An orientation and training is provided to Audit Committee
50 33 17
members.
8. The Audit Committee approves and monitors policies for financial
50 33 17
reporting.
9. The Audit Committee reviews management’s framework for
58 25 17
internal control.
10. The Audit Committee has established a process to receive and
25 33 42
investigate complaints.
11. The Audit Committee meets with the external auditor without
50 25 25
management present.
12. Audit Committee holds management accountable to act on the
83 0 17
recommendations of the audit reports (both external and internal).
13. The Audit Committee conducts a formal evaluation of its
8 50 42
performance in fulfilling its mandate.
14. Time required to fulfill Audit Committee functions is excessive. 0 75 25
15. Any comments/suggestions with respect to your Board’s Audit Committee? For confidentiality
purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
APPENDIX D
Page 11 of 19
This series of statements asks about the organization and operations of your Board. If the question is not
applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. Our Board by-laws are appropriate and are reviewed periodically. 2 6 44 36 12
2. There have been instances where the Board by-laws have not been
6 44 42 6 2
followed.
3. I am satisfied with the governance model, approach, or style that
2 4 20 56 18
this Board has adopted.
4. Our Board regularly reviews and updates its governance
4 14 46 28 8
policies/manual.
5. Our Board develops an annual work plan to ensure all governance
6 12 46 28 8
activities are fulfilled.
6. Our Chairperson does a good job of facilitating the Board meetings. 0 4 16 52 28
7. Our Chairperson is a strong leader, but not overly powerful or
0 6 16 46 32
intrusive.
8. The number of Board meetings held per year is sufficient for this
2 8 12 56 22
Board to be effective.
9. Our meetings are short, efficient and usually end on time. 0 16 18 46 20
10. Ample time is devoted to discussion and consensus building at
0 6 10 62 22
meetings.
11. There are members on this Board who spend less time than is
4 62 24 10 0
required to do an adequate job.
12. The decisions of the Board are excessively influenced by the CEO. 10 52 24 10 4
13. I am satisfied with the amount of time spent discussing
0 8 6 72 14
issues/asking questions, rather than listening to presentations.
14. Some members of the Board are overly focused on operational
8 56 22 12 2
issues rather than strategic ones.
15. Attaining quorum is sometimes an issue for this Board. 22 54 14 6 4
16. All Board members have the opportunity to express their views at
0 0 4 54 42
Board meetings.
17. I am generally satisfied with the advice and recommendations
0 6 12 58 24
received from senior management of the organization.
18. I am confident that management openly shares negative or difficult
0 6 16 54 24
information with the Board.
19. The Board has a process for handling urgent matters between
2 6 18 52 22
meetings.
20. The volume of our agendas forces us to move through items overly
4 68 12 12 4
quickly.
APPENDIX D
Page 12 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
21. We convene special meetings so that the Board is actively involved
0 6 36 48 10
in resolving critical issues facing the organization.
22. Our Board almost never meets without management present. 0 4 24 56 16
23. In-camera sessions are a standard agenda item and occur at almost
4 24 16 48 8
all meetings, even if only briefly.
24. Our Chairperson probes silent members for their opinions on key
2 18 36 34 10
issues.
25. Our Chairperson often asks for clarification of positions in order to
0 14 12 56 18
ensure understanding.
26. This Board is often simply ratifying decisions already made by the
8 44 22 20 6
CEO and senior management.
27. I sometimes feel that the Board can’t reverse decisions that were
12 62 16 6 4
pre-made by management prior to the Board meeting.
28. Our Chairperson does a good job of resolving conflict and
0 0 24 54 22
achieving consensus on the Board.
29. In my opinion, the current Board is providing less effective
16 54 16 12 2
governance than I would like.
30. Any comments/suggestions with respect to your Board’s organization/meetings? For confidentiality
purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
This section discusses various Board practices that your Board may or may not utilize in fulfilling your
governance role. This includes strategic planning, risk management, financial management practices,
handling conflicts of interest and conducting Board evaluations. If the question is not applicable, please
select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. The Board is actively involved in setting strategic direction and
2 14 24 48 12
priorities for this organization.
2. I am satisfied with the strategic planning process utilized by this
2 10 28 52 8
Board.
3. This Board does a good job of viewing issues strategically. 2 4 18 60 16
4. Our strategic plan and priorities are revisited throughout the year, as
2 10 36 38 14
necessary.
5. We often debate and deliberate over the organization’s priorities. 2 20 34 38 6
APPENDIX D
Page 13 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
6. This Board does a good job of identifying and assessing the risks
2 4 16 64 14
facing the organization.
7. This Board and management share a common view of the
0 6 14 66 14
organization’s priorities.
8. Given that Board members are not technical/industry experts, it is
difficult for the Board to have substantive input into the 8 54 26 10 2
strategic/business plan.
9. The Board generally approves the strategic plan without many
0 24 54 22 0
changes to management’s proposal.
10. Annually the Board identifies specific performance objectives that
4 18 38 30 10
it expects the organization to achieve.
11. Management does a good job of measuring organizational
2 10 24 50 14
performance on a variety of indicators.
12. I am satisfied with the performance of the organization in achieving
2 6 32 50 10
the goals established by this Board.
13. When budgeting, this Board allocates resources based on
0 12 52 32 4
organizational performance.
14. The budgets and financial statements are clear and appropriately
0 0 18 58 24
explained to Board members.
15. There are some Board members who do not have the financial
6 40 38 16 0
competency to adequately review budgets and financial statements.
16. Given that overall public policy and funding are set by government,
there is very little impact that the Board can have on the strategic 2 48 30 20 0
plan.
17. Overall, I am satisfied with the financial planning process. 0 6 18 62 14
18. Our Board is actively involved in the risk management process. 0 6 32 54 8
19. Risk management policies have been documented and approved by
2 12 44 32 10
the Board.
20. Our Board often asks risk-oriented, “what if” questions. 2 8 32 50 8
21. In my opinion, appropriate actions are taken to mitigate identified
0 6 20 66 8
risks.
22. Overall, I feel the Board is doing an adequate job of monitoring
0 8 14 70 8
organizational risks (both internal and external).
23. I am satisfied that all conflicts of interest, as well as related party
0 8 22 58 12
transactions, are disclosed to the Board in a timely manner.
24. I have on occasion felt uncomfortable with how a conflict of
22 44 26 6 2
interest was handled on this Board.
25. I feel comfortable in my understanding of the IT-related issues this
2 10 44 40 4
organization faces.
26. IT plays an important and critical role in achieving our
2 8 58 26 6
organization’s mandate.
APPENDIX D
Page 14 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
27. I am confident that this Board is providing effective oversight and
4 6 14 62 14
monitoring of the organization.
28. I am satisfied with what has been accomplished since I’ve been on
2 10 14 52 22
this Board.
29. This Board has established measures that evaluate the effectiveness
6 24 30 32 8
of the Board as a whole.
30. I believe positive improvements to Board performance would result
4 8 46 36 6
from conducting Board evaluations.
31. Our Board governance practices have been improving and I believe
0 8 38 50 4
will continue to do so.
32. An annual report is prepared by the organization. 0 0 22 56 22
33. Overall, this Board provides sound governance and financial
2 4 10 64 20
oversight.
APPENDIX D
Page 15 of 19
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Only as
Needed
Never
Other
7. How often are risk management reports received from management. 8 10 4 36 24 18
8. How often are IT matters included on the Board’s Agenda? 2 0 0 72 16 10
APPENDIX D
Page 16 of 19
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
2. What Board practice and/or activity do you see as the main challenge going forward for your Board?
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
This series of statements discusses various aspects of the Board’s relationship with the organization and
its senior management. If the question is not applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. We have been provided a tour of the organization and met key staff
4 16 20 38 22
members.
2. The Board has an appropriate level of involvement with the
0 6 32 52 10
organization and its staff.
3. The Board has established clear, measurable objectives for the
4 14 34 36 12
CEO’s performance.
4. The accountability relationship of the CEO to the Board is difficult
6 32 44 12 6
as the CEO is appointed directly by government.
5. The Board has the authority to hire and/or fire the CEO. 8 18 58 12 4
6. The Board has a specific process and criteria for recruiting and
10 12 64 14 0
appointing a CEO.
APPENDIX D
Page 17 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
7. Board does a good job of holding management accountable for the
2 8 36 48 6
overall performance of the organization.
8. Our CEO does a good job of implementing the Board’s decisions. 0 2 26 54 18
9. The Board annually conducts performance evaluations of the CEO,
8 12 52 20 8
based on pre-set criteria.
10. All Board members are involved in the CEO’s performance
10 18 48 16 8
evaluation.
11. I sometimes feel that the Chairperson is overly influenced by
16 54 22 4 4
management.
12. This Board becomes too involved in day-to-day management
16 64 20 0 0
decisions.
13. Management is receptive to constructive feedback provided by the
0 2 24 64 10
Board.
14. All Board members are appropriately independent of senior
4 8 24 52 12
management.
15. CEO expenses are reviewed and approved by the Chair (or
4 2 58 30 6
delegated to a Committee/Board member).
16. We have sufficient flexibility to compensate our CEO
8 10 58 20 4
appropriately.
17. The Board reviews and approves all bonus or supplementary
6 8 64 20 2
payments made to the CEO.
18. We often get presentations from senior managers, other than the
0 26 36 30 8
CEO and CFO.
19. I don’t feel it is right for me to second guess the decisions made by
senior management of the organization, who are experienced 20 36 34 8 2
professionals.
20. I can think of an instance where the CEO has not acted in
24 46 30 0 0
accordance with a decision of the Board.
21. I feel most accountable to the employees of this organization for the
4 24 56 14 2
impact of my decisions.
22. The Board has a productive relationship with senior management. 0 4 20 62 14
23. Overall, I am satisfied with the Board’s current relationship with its
2 2 24 48 24
CEO.
Yes No Unsure
%
24. CEO is a member of the Board, with full voting privileges. 16 66 18
Too About Too
Much Right Little
%
25. In my opinion, the authority this Board has allowed the CEO is: 8 92 0
APPENDIX D
Page 18 of 19
This series of statements asks about your Board’s various accountability relationships, including
government and the public. If the question is not applicable, please select ‘neutral/neither’.
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
1. The Board has a clear understanding of its legislative mandate. 0 4 16 64 16
2. The accountability requirements of this Board are clearly
0 8 18 60 14
understood by all Board members.
3. The Board has a clear picture of government’s public policy
0 10 32 48 10
objectives with respect to this organization.
4. The shared authorities between our Board and government lead to
0 24 54 18 4
ambiguities in our role.
5. The vision and strategic direction of this organization are aligned
0 10 44 40 6
with those of government.
6. The Minister and/or Department provides this Board with a
2 14 50 34 0
consistent message about government expectations.
7. Sometimes, the public policy initiatives that the government
expects the Board to undertake are not compatible with our 2 18 64 16 0
operational performance objectives.
8. The Minister/Department often make decisions without adequately
4 28 48 16 4
understanding the impact on our organization.
9. I feel our Board is overly constrained by government legislation
8 46 42 4 0
and/or regulations.
10. This Board is not independent enough of government to make
12 40 34 14 0
effective decisions.
11. This organization has sufficient influence over provincial policy
2 34 36 28 0
decisions that affect us.
12. I am satisfied with how often the Minister meets directly with our
10 14 48 24 4
Board.
13. We have been proactive in trying to assist the Minister/Department
0 4 34 48 14
in understanding our issues and funding needs.
14. Overall, I feel this Board has a very effective relationship with the
2 8 30 50 10
Minister/Department.
15. I feel most accountable to government for the impact of my
4 28 30 34 4
decisions.
16. At the end of the day, government is most responsible and
0 10 34 46 10
accountable for this organization to the citizens of PEI.
17. I believe that government will take action if the Board acts in a
0 10 24 60 6
manner that is inconsistent with its mandate.
18. This Board is accountable for all actions of the organization. 0 6 22 64 8
APPENDIX D
Page 19 of 19
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Neutral/
Neither
Agree
Agree
%
19. I feel most accountable to the community for the impact of my
0 6 34 36 24
decisions.
20. I feel that this Board does a good job of reporting organizational
2 14 28 48 8
performance publicly.
21. The accountability requirements and reporting obligations to the
0 2 26 68 4
Minister and/or Department are clear.
22. I believe our Board adequately considers the interests of key
0 4 12 68 16
stakeholders in making its decisions.
23. The Board ensures appropriate and understandable accountability
2 6 30 54 8
information is provided to all stakeholders, including the public.
24. Our annual report expressly indicates our goals and reports our
2 8 34 50 6
achievements against those goals.
25. Government does not overly interfere in the affairs of this board
2 4 30 58 6
and organization.
26. Annual reports of our organization receive adequate scrutiny by the
0 10 60 24 6
Legislative Assembly or its committees.
27. I would say the relationship between government and this
0 0 54 42 4
Board/organization is improving.
28. Overall, I feel that this Board adequately fulfills its accountability
0 2 8 72 18
to the Minister.
29. What do you see as the key challenges for this board in dealing with the Department and/or Minister?
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
30. What changes, if any, would you recommend to improve the relationship between your Board and
government? For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed
in this report.
GENERAL COMMENTS
While this survey has covered a wide-range of issues that influence the governance of public sector
Boards, there may be areas we may have missed that you consider important. Any further comments or
specific issues you would like to share with us or bring to our attention would be most appreciated.
For confidentiality purposes, any comments provided by respondents are not disclosed in this report.
6.2 The Act stipulates that there will be a levy on fuel at rates as listed
in the Act. The levy will generally be collected by registered agents and
remitted to the Government on a regular basis. There are special rules
around items such as mixtures and blends of fuels and rebranded fuel. The
Act does provide certain exemptions and provides details on offences and
penalties that may be issued.
6.3 In accordance with Section 2(3) of the Act, the Auditor General is
responsible for reporting annually to the Legislative Assembly on the
amount of the levy collected under the Act, and the amounts returned to
consumers, businesses and municipalities. This is the first year of
reporting under the Act and it covers the period of April 1, 2019 to March
31, 2020.
6.4 For the period of April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020, a total of
$13,081,837 was collected by the Province as carbon levy revenue under
the Act. This balance was returned to Islanders through the following
initiatives: reduction in gasoline tax rates, free drivers’ licenses, reductions
in motor vehicle registration costs and a reduction in transit fees. These
initiatives totaled $18,018,442 over this period, broken down as follows:
* Majority of subsidies provided relate to fossil fuel powered vehicles at 20% of motor vehicle
registration fees. Other subsidies were provided at 50% of registration fees for non-plug-in hybrid
vehicles and 100% of registration fees for electric or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.
6.5 The total returned to Islanders during the period of April 1, 2019 to
March 31, 2020 was $4,936,605 higher than the carbon levy collected.
The excess spending constitutes a net loss for the Province.
7.2 Under Section 5(1), a head of a government office may request the
Auditor General to examine a specific advertising item not yet made
public, to determine whether the item will meet the standards set out in the
Act.
7.4 In accordance with Section 9(1) of the Act, the Auditor General is
required to report annually to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly
about any matter that is considered appropriate to report under this Act.
7.5 One request was received during the year, dated September 24,
2020, under Section 5(1) of the Act. The proposed advertising item was
determined to meet the advertising standards established in the
Government Advertising Standards Act.
8.1 On April 10, 2020, the Honorable Dennis King requested the
Auditor General, under Section 14(d) of the Audit Act, to undertake a
special assignment to examine Government’s COVID-19 pandemic
response. In particular, the Auditor General was requested to complete a
financial examination of the Provincial Government’s COVID-19
programming and supports, and the special warrants associated with
COVID-19 for the period commencing March 13, 2020.
Phase 2 and Phase 3 both include ongoing programs and programs not yet
established. Expected reporting timelines for Phase 2 and Phase 3 have
not yet been established.
8.5 Exclusions from the scope of our audit include deferral programs,
programs paid through existing departmental budgets, rather than through
the COVID-19 Emergency Contingency Fund, and extensions of existing
programs, such as employment programs.
EXHIBIT 8.1
BUDGETED EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT OR CROWN
PHASE 1
Department of Transportation,
Infrastructure and Energy ($1.9M -
3.6%)
Department of Social Development
and Housing ($2.6M - 4.9%)
* Included in our Phase I work, but not included in the above chart, due to the limited dollar
amount, is $100,000 in expenditures for the Department of Finance
What we found
The 2017 and 2018 annual reports of the Auditor General included 60
recommendations from 6 performance audits and examinations.
BACKGROUND
OBSERVATIONS
IMPLEMENTATION 9.7 For several years we have been reporting, based on limited
RATES assurance, the status of implementation of recommendations included in
previous annual reports. Exhibit 9.1 shows the implementation rates of
EXHIBIT 9.1
PERFORMANCE AUDITS AND EXAMINATIONS
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
ANNUAL REPORT YEARS
100%
93%
90% 87%
80% 76%
77%
70%
64%
60%
50% 50%
40%
30% 33%
20%
10%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018*
*2018 to be updated in 2022
2017 ANNUAL 9.8 Exhibit 9.2 shows the overall rate of implementation of
REPORT recommendations for each audit included in our 2017 Annual Report.
EXHIBIT 9.2
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS*
BASED ON LIMITED ASSURANCE
2017 ANNUAL REPORT
Implemented
Audit Total Outstanding
# Percent
Climate Change 8 1 7 88%
Office of the Public Trustee 12 3 9 75%
Seniors Housing Program 10 3 7 70%
Total* 30 7 23 77%
*As of October 31, 2020
Climate Change
9.11 In 2015, the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, and all
provincial legislative offices, agreed to work together on a collaborative
audit initiative regarding climate change. In the spring of 2016, all
partners agreed to work together to determine the extent to which federal,
provincial, and territorial goverments in Canada are meeting their
commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and to adapt to climate
change risks. Each participating office issued a separate report based on
the work conducted within their respective jurisdiction. A collaborative
audit report was issued as well, which incorporated the issues identified by
all participating offices.
Status of recommendations
9.17 The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the Public
Trustee Office:
Status of recommendations
9.21 Until these recommendations are fully implemented, the risks they
were intended to address remain:
9.23 The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the Housing
Services Division:
Status of recommendations
2018 ANNUAL 9.27 This is the first year we have assessed the implementation of our
REPORT 2018 recommendations. Overall, we concluded that 50 percent of these
recommendations were implemented. Exhibit 9.3 provides a breakdown
of the results.
EXHIBIT 9.3
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS*
BASED ON LIMITED ASSURANCE
2018 ANNUAL REPORT
Implemented
Audit Total Outstanding
# Percent
Status of recommendations
• assistance decisions;
• amounts approved; and
• right to appeal.
9.36 Subsequent to our original audit, Health PEI has been developing a
planned, phased in approach, transitioning the service delivery model of
medications for long-term care residents from the Provincial Pharmacy to
a unit dose packager at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH). All long-
term care facilities, with the exception of Sherwood Home, now receive
specific medication strips packaged by an automated unit dose packager at
the QEH.
9.37 Per management, aside from the specific medication strips which
facilitate tracing, there is a limited quantity of non-patient specific
controlled substances on site at long-term care facilities. Management
also advised that access to all narcotic and controlled substances at these
facilities is limited to those with keys.
Status of recommendations
9.43 The Office of the Public Guardian responds to the needs of those
deemed medically incapable of making their own personal care decisions
when there are no trusted family or friends available or willing to assume
responsibility. The Public Guardian is responsible to act in the best
interests of guardian clients, and represents some of Prince Edward
Island’s most vulnerable residents.
9.44 The objective of our audit was to determine whether the Office of
the Public Guardian had a well-defined process to support the rationale,
documentation, and approval of care decisions, where a care decision was
defined as a significant health care decision, or a change in a client’s
residence and/or care provider.
Status of recommendations
9.46 We would like to thank the Office of the Public Guardian for
implementing 100% of our recommendations.
APPENDIX A
Page 1 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Climate Change
Department of 2.43 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment
Environment, should coordinate provincial strategy development and Complete
Energy and implementation related to climate change.
Climate Action 2.44 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment
(formerly should develop a climate change strategy including both
Communities, mitigation and adaptation which focuses on the key risks and
Land, and vulnerabilities of the province. The strategy should include at
Environment) a minimum
Complete
• objectives;
• planned actions;
• timeframe;
• roles and responsibilities; and
• public reporting requirements.
2.45 Executive Council should approve provincial climate change
Complete
strategies.
2.46 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment
should provide annual public reports on progress made to Complete
mitigate and adapt to climate change.
2.66 Executive Council should establish clearly defined provincial
targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. These Complete
targets should be publicly communicated.
2.67 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment should
ensure documented implementation plans are completed for all
key mitigation actions. This would include at a minimum:
• assignment of responsibility; Complete
• timelines for each action;
• financial and other resources required; and
• performance measures.
2.76 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment
should prepare a province-wide risk assessment for adaptation
Not Complete
to climate change. This assessment should identify, analyze
and prioritize key risks.
2.77 The Department of Communities, Land and Environment should
ensure documented implementation plans are completed for all
key adaptation actions. This would include at a minimum:
• assignment of responsibility; Complete
• timelines for each action;
• financial and other resources required; and
• performance measures.
APPENDIX A
Page 2 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Office of the Public Trustee
Department of 3.25 The Public Trustee Office should document and regularly
Complete
Justice and Public update key summary information on each client.
Safety 3.26 The Public Trustee Office should record the revenues and
Complete
expenses for each client.
3.27 The Public Trustee Office should provide adequate oversight
Complete
for all clients.
3.32 The Public Trustee Office should act in a timely manner to
establish a complete listing and take control of assets and Not Complete
liabilities for each client.
3.33 The Public Trustee Office should reconcile auction proceeds
to the inventory of significant assets and maintain appropriate Complete
documentation.
3.40 The Public Trustee Office should develop and implement
adequate internal controls to safeguard and maintain client’s
financial assets. This, at a minimum, should include
• appropriate segregation of duties;
Complete
• review and approval of documentation to support
disbursements; and
• timely preparation and review of monthly bank
reconciliations.
3.43 The Public Trustee should obtain regular summary reports to
Complete
facilitate oversight of client accounts.
3.47 The Public Trustee Office should maintain organized client
files containing all relevant documentation to support Complete
transactions.
3.57 The Public Trustee Office should take action to implement an
accounting system that facilitates timely, accurate information Not Complete
for management decision making and reporting.
3.67 The Public Trustee Office should establish documented
policies and procedures to guide staff in conducting the work
of the Office. At a minimum, these should include
• administration of client files; Complete
• financial controls;
• managing client investments; and
• contacting known heirs.
3.71 The Office of the Public Trustee should establish documented
Complete
performance measures.
APPENDIX A
Page 3 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Office of the Public Trustee (cont’d)
Department of 3.72 The Public Trustee Office should annually report to the public
Justice and Public on its performance. Not Complete
Safety
Seniors Housing Program
Department of 4.28 The Housing Services Division should prepare a long-term
Social plan to address the current and expected future demand for Complete
Development and low income seniors housing.
Housing 4.40 The Housing Services Division should establish a process for
(formerly Family housing officers to verify income, assets, and housing costs at Complete
and Human the time of application.
Services) 4.41 The Housing Services Division should ensure that housing
Not Complete
officers comply with policy in assessing applicants.
4.42 The Housing Services Division should implement a quality
Not Complete
control review process for assessments.
4.52 The Housing Services Division should develop a process to
ensure accurate, relevant wait list information is available for Complete
the Seniors Housing Program on a timely basis.
4.70 The Housing Services Division should ensure placements are
made based on program policy. Exceptions to policy should Complete
be documented and authorized by senior management.
4.71 The Housing Services Division should ensure sufficient
Complete
documentation is maintained to support placement decisions.
4.72 The Housing Services Division should provide guidance to
Complete
housing officers regarding challenging applicants.
4.75 The Housing Services Division should establish performance
indicators as a basis to measure and report on program Complete
performance.
4.76 The Housing Services Division should report publicly on the
performance of its low income Seniors Housing Program. Not Complete
APPENDIX B
Page 1 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Social Assistance Program
Department of 2.22 The Department of Family and Human Services should
Social establish performance indicators and targets to measure and
Complete
Development and monitor its progress in achieving the objectives of the Social
Housing Assistance Program.
(formerly Family 2.23 The Department of Family and Human Services should
and Human annually report to the Legislative Assembly on the
Not Complete
Services) administration of the Social Assistance Program including
program goals and results.
2.37 The Department of Family and Human Services should
annually provide information to Executive Council to support
Not Complete
its review of social assistance rates and exemptions from
financial resources.
2.38 The Department of Family and Human Services should ensure
that changes in social assistance rates are approved by Complete
Executive Council prior to implementation.
2.45 The Department of Family and Human Services should
complete annual reviews in accordance with the Social Not Complete
Assistance Act Regulations.
2.48 The Department of Family and Human Services should
conduct and document home visits in accordance with Not Complete
Program policy.
2.54 The Department of Family and Human Services should record
Complete
all applications in the case management system.
2.55 The Department of Family and Human Services should
inform all applicants in writing its decision regarding social
Not Complete
assistance, the reason(s) for the decision, any amounts
approved, and the right to appeal.
2.62 The Department of Family and Human Services should
maintain the internal review function of its Audit Services Complete
Section.
2.65 Management of the Social Programs Division should ensure
social assistance payments are authorized in accordance with Complete
Treasury Board Policy.
2.75 The Department of Family and Human Services should
complete and update case plans for recipients of social Not Complete
assistance in accordance with policy.
APPENDIX B
Page 2 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Medication Controls: Institutional Pharmacy Program
Health PEI 3.20 Health PEI should develop policies and procedures to
strengthen medication controls and improve coordination for
Not Complete
management and delivery of the Institution Pharmacy
Program.
3.32 The Provincial Pharmacy should conduct and adequately
document monthly inventory counts of narcotics and Not Complete
controlled drugs.
3.33 The Provincial Pharmacy should investigate all inventory
discrepancies of narcotics and controlled drugs. All
discrepancies should be supported with documentation, Complete
reviewed, and signed off by management. Any unexplained
variances should be reported.
3.34 The Provincial Pharmacy should enforce individual electronic
Complete
login protocols.
3.49 Health PEI should improve controls over dispensing and
oversight of ward stock narcotics for provincially-owned Not Complete
long-term care facilities.
3.50 Provincial Pharmacy staff should have access to essential
information to evaluate the appropriateness of initial
Complete
prescriptions and refill requests prior to dispensing
medication.
3.55 Health PEI should document a policy on the transportation of
medications from the Provincial Pharmacy to the Not Complete
provincially-owned long-term care facilities.
3.60 Health PEI should establish a policy on conducting
comprehensive medication reviews for residents of Not Complete
provincially-owned long-term care facilities.
3.73 Provincially-owned long-term care facilities should ensure
that inventory records for narcotics include the actual amount
Complete
of each drug counted in addition to verification that the count
was completed.
3.74 Provincially-owned long-term care facilities should ensure
controlled drugs are recorded and regularly counted.
Not Complete
Discrepancies should be investigated and unexplained
shortages should be reported.
3.83 Health PEI should implement policies and procedures to
require the Provincial Pharmacy and the long-term care
Not Complete
facilities to maintain a clear trail of accountability for all
narcotics and controlled drugs.
APPENDIX B
Page 3 of 3
Status of
Implementation
Audit Para. Recommendation
as at
Oct 31, 2020
Medication Controls: Institutional Pharmacy Program (cont’d)
3.84 Provincially-owned long-term care facilities should return all
unused, discontinued, and expired narcotics and controlled Not Complete
drugs to the Provincial Pharmacy.
3.90 Health PEI should develop documented procedures for the
disposal of medications consistent with federal regulatory Not Complete
requirements.
3.91 Documentation supporting the disposal of narcotics and
controlled drugs should be maintained by the Provincial Complete
Pharmacy in accordance with federal regulatory requirements.
3.92 Unserviceable narcotics and controlled drugs should either be
de-natured and disposed of by the Provincial Pharmacy or
Complete
destroyed by a licensed third party in accordance with Health
Canada requirements.
Office of the Public Guardian
Department of 4.17 The Office of the Public Guardian should clearly and
Justice and Public consistently communicate its roles and responsibilities to care Complete
Safety providers.
4.18 The Office of the Public Guardian should define the types of
significant care decisions that must be approved by the Public
Complete
Guardian and formally communicate this information to care
providers.
4.22 The Office of the Public Guardian should document and
implement policies to guide staff in managing key risks and Complete
responsibilities.
4.33 The Office of the Public Guardian should document the
Complete
authorization and rationale for significant care decisions.
APPENDIX C
Page 1 of 2
SCOPE AND The scope of our work included only recommendations from performance
APPROACH audits and examinations included in the 2017 and 2018 annual reports.
We provide limited assurance on those recommendations assessed by
management as complete as at October 31, 2020.
APPENDIX C
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX D
Page 1 of 4
APPENDIX D
Page 2 of 4
APPENDIX D
Page 3 of 4
APPENDIX D
Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 10.1
QUARTERLY UPDATES BY DEPARTMENTS
AND REPORTING ENTITIES
AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
Entity* Year June 30, Sept 30, Dec 31, Mar 31, June 30, Sept 30,
2019 2019 2019 2020 2020 2020
Department of
Environment, Energy and
Climate Action
Climate Change 2017 No Yes No No No Yes
Department of Justice and
Public Safety
Office of the Public Trustee 2017 Yes Yes No No No Yes
Office of the Public
2018 No No No No No Yes
Guardian
Department of Social
Development and Housing
Seniors Housing Program 2017 No Yes No No No Yes
Social Assistance Program 2018 No Yes No No No Yes
Health PEI
Medication Controls:
Institutional Pharmacy 2018 No No No No No No
Program
*Reflects current entity responsible
10.5 Our Office met with the Secretary to Treasury Board in September
2020, in regard to the lack of quarterly updates provided. We were
informed that processes have been established to ensure reporting, on a go
forward basis, will be provided to Treasury Board quarterly.
11.5 The Audit Act requires the Auditor General to perform financial
audits of the Province’s consolidated financial statements. We also
perform the annual financial statement audit for the following entities:
• Health PEI
• PEI Advisory Council on the Status of Women
• PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation
• PEI Public Sector Pension Plan
• PEI Crown Building Corporation
• PEI Grain Elevators Corporation
• PEI Lotteries Commission
• PEI Self-Insurance and Risk Management Fund
• PEI Teachers’ Pension Plan
• Pension Plan for Members of the Legislative Assembly
• Public Trustee
• Supreme Court of PEI Trust Accounts
11.6 The Audit Act requires the Auditor General to bring to the attention
of the Legislative Assembly any matter identified during an audit which in
his/her opinion should be brought to its attention.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
What we found
• As at March 31, 2020, the net debt of the Province totalled $2.2
billion. This represents an increase of $81.5 million during the year.
• Net debt per capita increased for the first time in a number of years
and was $13,814 per person, as at March 31, 2020.
BACKGROUND
FINANCIAL 12.4 Exhibit 12.1 summarizes the Province’s financial position and
HIGHLIGHTS operating results for the last five years.
EXHIBIT 12.1
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
($ Millions)
Net Debt 12.5 An important and widely accepted measure of the financial
condition of government is net debt. Net debt is the difference between
liabilities and financial assets. It provides a measure of the amount of
future revenue that will be required to pay for past operations.
12.6 Net debt increased during the year by $81.5 million and was $2.2
billion as at March 31, 2020. The reason for the increase in the net debt
was mainly due to an increase in investment in tangible capital assets of
$80.7 million.
12.7 Net debt sits at its highest level following consistent reductions
from fiscal years 2016 to 2019.
Financial 12.8 Financial assets increased by $246 million since March 31, 2019.
Assets and The main reason for this increase was due to a $170 million cash reserve
Liabilities that was established in March 2020 to prepare for the impact of additional
spending due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
12.9 Exhibit 12.1 also shows that total liabilities have increased by
approximately $327.5 million since March 31, 2019. The main reason for
the increase was the result of an increase in short-term loans payable of
$309.4 million, as the Province secured additional funding in anticipation
of additional spending related to the pandemic.
Annual Surplus / 12.11 The annual surplus/deficit indicates the extent to which a
Deficit government spends more or less than what is generated in revenue in a
particular year. It indicates whether a government is living within its
means.
12.12 For the year ended March 31, 2020, the Province had a surplus of
$22 million, the third consecutive surplus. This surplus was significantly
greater than the original budgeted surplus of $1.8 million, and the
subsequently forecasted deficit of $3.7 million, based on preliminary
results in the spring of 2020.
12.15 The increase in federal revenues was due largely to increases in:
Canada Health Transfers, infrastructure program funding and crop
insurance payouts. The increase in tax revenues was created from a
growing economy, resulting in higher personal income and sales tax
revenues, as well as a new revenue stream from a carbon levy
implemented on April 1, 2019. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease in corporate income tax which resulted from significant loss
carrybacks applied to previous years. These loss carrybacks were driven
by new tax incentives available to certain business sectors.
12.17 The increase in expenses for the Ministry of Health and Wellness
were largely due to compensation costs, which increased by nearly 5% at
Health PEI. The increase in expenses for the Department of
Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy was related to additional
infrastructure program grants received from the Government of Canada,
resulting in an increase in work associated with infrastructure projects.
The increase in expenses for the Ministry of Social Development and
Housing resulted from additional housing program grants and rent
supplement expenses, plus additional grants issued related to the
AccessAbility Supports Program.
Budget to Actual 12.18 Exhibit 12.2 provides a summary breakdown of the change in the
Province’s annual surplus from the amount originally budgeted to the
actual surplus realized.
EXHIBIT 12.2
CHANGE IN ANNUAL SURPLUS
BUDGET TO ACTUAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2020
($ Millions)
Revenues 12.19 Overall, revenues were $33.8 million lower than the amount
originally budgeted. Lower tax revenues and Government of Canada
transfers were the main reasons why the actual revenues did not meet the
budgeted expectations for the year ended March 31, 2020.
12.20 Tax revenues were $14.2 million lower than the amount originally
budgeted. The majority of the reduction was attributable to lower than
expected corporate and personal tax revenues that were partially offset by
higher than expected sales tax revenues.
12.21 Corporate tax revenues were $20.5 million lower than budgeted
mainly due to income tax loss carrybacks that had not been anticipated.
We were advised that a significant portion of the loss carrybacks were the
result of a new accelerated investment incentive that allowed companies in
certain sectors to write-off capital assets faster for tax purposes. Personal
tax revenues were $9.8 million lower than budgeted; however, they did
increase by $21.8 million from prior year. Sales taxes were $18.4 million
higher than budgeted. The rise in sales tax can be attributed to stronger
economic conditions than originally projected.
12.22 Provincial tax revenues totalled $1.1 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2020. Exhibit 12.3 shows the source of provincial tax
revenues for the year.
EXHIBIT 12.3
PROVINCIAL TAX REVENUES BY SOURCE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2020
Property Tax
12.1%
Sales Tax
31.6%
12.23 Exhibit 12.4 shows the total for the four largest sources of
provincial tax revenues from 2016 to 2020. Personal, sales, and property
tax revenues have continued their upward trend, while corporate income
tax revenue had a sharp decline, due to the significant loss carrybacks filed
during the period.
EXHIBIT 12.4
TOTAL TAX REVENUES
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
($ Millions)
$410.0
$360.0
$310.0
$260.0
$210.0
$160.0
$110.0
$60.0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Personal Income Tax Sales Tax
Property Tax Corporate Income Tax
12.25 Other income was $10.3 million higher than budgeted. The main
reasons were: Workers Compensation Board of Prince Edward Island
provided Health PEI with an unbudgeted surplus distribution of $4.2
million, and an additional $3.1 million was received by Health PEI from
hospital foundations for capital purchases, in excess of amounts originally
budgeted.
Expenses 12.26 Expenses were $54.0 million lower than budgeted in 2019-20. The
following are the areas where significant variances from budget were
identified:
• Expenses were $15.8 million lower than budgeted for the Department
of Finance. This was due mainly to $6.0 million in salary accruals
budgeted in 19-20, however incurred in the previous fiscal period, and
an AgriRecovery initiative payment of $6.1 million that was reflected
in the expenses of the Department of Agriculture and Land, but
budgeted by the Department of Finance;
• Expenses were $19.9 million greater than budgeted in the Department
of Social Development and Housing. $8.6 million was related to a
higher than expected program uptake and increased costs per case
related to the disability support program known as AccessAbility
Supports, and additional PEI Housing Corporation program costs of
$5.1 million over budget; and
• Expenses were $51.9 million lower than budgeted for the Department
of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy, due to various delays in
the progress of infrastructure projects.
FINANCIAL INDICATORS
Net Debt to 12.29 Net debt to GDP provides a measure of the financial demands
GDP placed on the economy by the Province’s spending and taxation policies.
A decreasing ratio indicates net debt is growing at a rate slower than the
growth in the economy. The Province’s net debt to GDP ratio has
declined since 2016 as shown in Exhibit 12.5.
EXHIBIT 12.5
NET DEBT TO GDP
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
37%
35%
33%
31%
29%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
12.30 Exhibit 12.6 compares the Province’s net debt to GDP with the
other Canadian provinces. As at March 31, 2020, PEI’s net debt to GDP
ratio was lower than six other provinces, and higher than British
Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan.
EXHIBIT 12.6
NET DEBT TO GDP CANADIAN PROVINCES
MARCH 31, 2020
45%
40.8%
39.6%
40% 37.2%
36.4%
34.2%
35% 32.7%
29.3%
30%
25%
20%
14.7% 14.8%
15%
11.4%
10%
5%
0%
BC AB SK MB ON QC NS NB PE NL
Source: Net debt derived from each province’s consolidated financial statements as at March 31,
2020 and GDP data from Statistics Canada, published November 9, 2020
12.32 Exhibit 12.7 shows that the Province’s net debt per capita had
been decreasing steadily from 2016 until 2019, however, it had a slight
increase in 2020.
EXHIBIT 12.7
NET DEBT PER CAPITA
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
$15,000
$14,500
$14,000
$13,500
$13,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
12.33 A comparison of PEI’s net debt per capita to the other Canadian
provinces is provided in Exhibit 12.8. PEI’s net debt per capita ratio is
more favorable than most provinces, other than British Columbia, Alberta,
and Saskatchewan.
EXHIBIT 12.8
NET DEBT PER CAPITA CANADIAN PROVINCES
MARCH 31, 2020
$30,000
27,648
23,981
$25,000
19,979
$20,000 18,285 17,815
15,564
13,814
$15,000
10,426
8,810 9,078
$10,000
$5,000
$0
BC AB SK MB ON QC NS NB PE NL
Source: Net debt derived from each province’s consolidated financial statements at March 31,
2020 and population data from Statistics Canada, published September 29, 2020
Net Debt to 12.34 Exhibit 12.9 depicts the ratio of net debt to total revenues. This
Total Revenues ratio is a measure of the future revenue that will be required to pay for past
transactions. The Province’s ratio has decreased significantly from 2016
to 2020, which is a positive trend.
EXHIBIT 12.9
NET DEBT TO TOTAL REVENUES
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
125%
120%
115%
110%
105%
100%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Expenses to GDP 12.35 During 2019-20, government expenses increased by $143.9 million
from the prior period. Comparing expenses to GDP provides the trend of
government spending over time, in relation to the growth in the economy.
An increasing ratio indicates government spending is growing at a rate
faster than the growth in the economy. Expenses as a percentage of GDP
have remained relatively consistent since 2016. Exhibit 12.10 shows
Government expenses to GDP on a comparative basis.
EXHIBIT 12.10
EXPENSES TO GDP
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
31%
30%
29%
28%
27%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
FLEXIBILITY 12.36 Flexibility is the degree to which a government can increase its
financial resources to respond to rising commitments, by either incurring
debt or raising additional revenue. A government meets the test of
flexibility when it can respond to changing economic conditions, such as a
recession or higher interest rates, without making substantial changes to
the way it operates.
Interest Bite and 12.38 One measure of a government’s flexibility is the interest bite. This
InterestCosts
Interest Charges
to Total is the amount of annual interest charge as a percentage of total revenues
Revenues and is shown in Exhibit 12.11. This indicator illustrates the extent to
which past borrowing decisions constrain a government’s ability to
provide programs and services in the future. The interest charges to total
revenues ratio has continued to decline.
EXHIBIT 12.11
INTEREST CHARGES TO TOTAL REVENUES
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
8.0%
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
12.39 Exhibit 12.12 displays total interest charges of the Province over
the past five years. Interest charges totalled $125.8 million during 2019-
20. This means the first $125.8 million of revenue must be used to pay
interest charges, and is not available for government programs and
services. Interest charges have remained relatively flat for the past few
years, in an environment where interest rates are now at extremely low
levels.
EXHIBIT 12.12
INTEREST CHARGES
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
($ Millions)
$131
$130
$129
$128
$127
$126
$125
$124
$123
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Own Source 12.40 Own source revenues, as a percentage of GDP, indicates the extent
Revenues to GDP to which a government is taking money out of the local economy through
taxation, fees, and/or other charges. Exhibit 12.13 indicates the
percentage has declined compared to prior year and is lower than it was in
2016.
EXHIBIT 12.13
OWN SOURCE REVENUES TO GDP
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
20%
19%
18%
17%
16%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
EXHIBIT 12.14
FEDERAL REVENUES TO TOTAL REVENUES
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
($ Millions)
39%
38%
37%
36%
35%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
GLOSSARY
Financial assets are cash and other assets which could provide resources to
pay liabilities or finance future operations.
Net debt is the difference between the government’s total liabilities and its
financial assets.
Non-financial assets are tangible capital assets such as buildings, roads, and
equipment, as well as prepaid expenses and inventories. The book value of
tangible capital assets increases as they are acquired, and is reduced over a
period of time through amortization. These assets do not normally provide
resources to discharge liabilities.
Gross domestic product (GDP) is a measure of the value of all goods and
services produced in a jurisdiction in a given period. The province’s GDP is
measured and reported by Statistics Canada.
Nominal gross domestic product is gross domestic product that has not
been adjusted for inflation.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
What we found
BACKGROUND
13.3 The Audit Act requires the Auditor General to annually audit the
Province’s consolidated financial statements and provide an independent
auditor’s report stating whether the statements are fairly presented.
13.4 Under Section 17 of the Act, the Auditor General is not required to
audit or report on the accounts of any agency of Government where
another auditor has been designated to audit its accounts. As part of the
audit of the consolidated financial statements, the Auditor General
reviews, as necessary, audit work performed by the external auditors of
those government entities.
AUDIT OPINION
statements for the year ended March 31, 2020, were fairly presented in
accordance with Canadian Public Sector Accounting Standards.
deadline was met, Prince Edward Island was one of only a few provinces
that required an extension to the deadline. We encourage Government to
practice emergency preparedness in order to limit operational and
reporting delays that result from events such as COVID-19.
Recommendation
PUBLIC SECTOR 13.13 During our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the
ACCOUNTING year ended March 31, 2020, we noted that some financial statement
STANDARDS transactions were not recorded in accordance with Canadian Public Sector
Accounting Standards (PSAS). These transactions were discussed with
staff of the Comptroller’s Office and recommendations for correction were
provided to the Comptroller. In some cases, corrections were made. The
uncorrected transactions did not affect our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements, as the cumulative effect was not
considered material.
Accrual Basis of 13.14 PSAS requires that items recognized in government financial
Accounting statements be accounted for in accordance with the accrual basis of
accounting. The accrual basis of accounting recognizes the effects of
transactions in the period in which they occur, regardless of whether there
has been a receipt or payment of cash.
Future Changes to 13.16 The Canadian Public Sector Accounting Board issued new or
Accounting amended standards for the public sector that become effective April 1,
Standards 2022. These standards relate to financial statement presentation, foreign
currency translation, portfolio investments, asset retirement obligations
and financial instruments. The new standard related to asset retirement
obligations has the potential to significantly impact the future financial
results of the Province. We encourage the Comptroller’s Office to be
proactive in preparing for these changes.
Recommendations
Prior Year 13.20 There were issues raised in the prior year that were not addressed,
Recommendations including:
Recommendation
ABSENCE OF 13.22 The Government of Province Edward Island has been providing an
SIGNED annual, non-repayable debt service grant, to the University of Prince
FUNDING Edward Island to finance construction costs associated with the
AGREEMENT Sustainable Design Engineering Program. This funding arrangement
began in 2016-17, and will be in place for a 20 year term. The maximum
total funding over the term is approximately $20 million. During our
audit, we noted that a signed agreement is not in place for this funding
arrangement.
Recommendation
General 13.26 During our audit, we identified amounts that were included in the
Government budget of General Government, under the Department of Finance, but the
Budget actual results were not reflected as expenses of General Government. This
contributed to the General Government and Department of Finance being
significantly under budget in the 2020 fiscal year.
13.27 The General Government budget for the 2020 fiscal year included
approximately $6 million for salary negotiation expenditures that had been
accrued and recorded in the 2019 fiscal period. The budget for salary
negotiations was not prepared on the same basis of accounting as the
actual expenditures.
13.28 There was a payment of $6.1 million to cover the costs of the
AgriRecovery initiative on behalf of Prince Edward Island Agricultural
Insurance Corporation (AIC). The costs for this initiative were
appropriately recorded as part of AIC expenditures, however, the budgeted
amount was reflected in General Government. We recommended a budget
reclassification to the Comptroller’s Office, but the reclassification was
not made.
Prior Year 13.29 For several years, we noted the Province’s budget document, the
Recommendations Estimates of Revenue and Expenditures, is not presented on the same basis
as its consolidated financial statements. A separate reconciliation was
necessary in the schedules to the consolidated financial statements. The
original budgeted revenues and expenses were increased by $20.4 million
to present them on a comparative basis with the actual financial results.
13.30 The Province’s original budget document does not present the
budgeted revenues and expenses of some consolidated entities on a line by
line basis. To provide the comparison of budget to actual in the
consolidated financial statements, the original budget was reallocated.
Recommendation
DEBTS 13.35 Section 16 of the Audit Act requires the Auditor General to report
CANCELLED, the total amount of any claims, obligations, debts, or monies due to the
DISCHARGED, Province that have been discharged, cancelled, and/or released under
WRITTEN OFF Section 26 of the Financial Administration Act. For the year ended
March 31, 2020, the amounts cancelled or discharged under Section 26 (1)
are detailed in Exhibit 13.1. Also included are amounts written off under
Section 26.1(1).
EXHIBIT 13.1
AMOUNTS CANCELLED, DISCHARGED OR WRITTEN OFF
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2020
Cancellations Write-offs
Section 26(1) Section 26.1(1)
PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation $ 28,450 $ -
PEI Grain Elevators Corporation 7,545 16,749
Real Property Tax Act 1,406,550 -
Student Financial Assistance Corporation 1,500,664 -
Total $2,943,209 $16,749
Source: Orders-in-Council April 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020.
SURPLUS 13.36 Section 16 of the Audit Act also requires the Auditor General to
(DEFICIT) include information in the Annual Report on surpluses/deficits of
AGENCIES, agencies, boards, and Crown corporations. Exhibit 13.2 includes the
BOARDS, AND surplus or deficit of each entity for the year ended March 31, 2020.
CROWN
CORPORATIONS
EXHIBIT 13.2
SURPLUS (DEFICIT)
AGENCIES, BOARDS, AND CROWN CORPORATIONS
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2020
Annual
Surplus (Deficit)
$
Charlottetown Area Development Corporation* 861,224
Finance PEI 210,076
French Language School Board 17,844
Health PEI (31,009)
Innovation PEI 303,942
Island Investment Development Inc. 24,139,827
Island Waste Management Corporation (269,579)
PEI Advisory Council on the Status of Women (1,082)
PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation*** 11,696,978
PEI Cannabis Management Corporation** 653,401
PEI Crown Building Corporation -
PEI Energy Corporation 8,700,554
PEI Grain Elevators Corporation (July 31, 2019) (177,281)
PEI Housing Corporation *** (175,600)
PEI Human Rights Commission 38,452
PEI Liquor Control Commission** 22,468,919
PEI Lotteries Commission** 14,757,337
PEI Marine Science Organization 48,026
PEI Museum and Heritage Foundation 15,194
PEI Regulatory and Appeals Commission 7,047
PEI Self-Insurance and Risk Management Fund 2,137,294
PEI Student Financial Assistance Corporation 307,726
PEI 2014 Inc. (5,684)
Public Schools Branch 1,091
Summerside Regional Development Corporation (54,123)
Tourism PEI -
Source: The Province’s Volume III Public Accounts March 31, 2020
*Includes the provincial portion only
**Surplus distributed to operating fund
***Based on draft financial statements
CHAPTER SUMMARY
What we found
The majority of issues identified are recurring issues that have been raised
in previous management letters.
BACKGROUND
SCOPE
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS
14.9 Consistent with prior years, some Health PEI physician contracts
have not been updated and signed. The Prince Edward Island Housing
Corporation did not maintain adequate documentation in a number of
tenant files. The Prince Edward Island Grain Elevators Corporation did
not document all decisions made at meetings of its board of directors.
Compliance Issues 14.10 Governments have objectives and establish regulations, policies,
and procedures to clearly communicate expectations. We noted a number
of compliance issues during our financial statement audits. These issues
related to compliance with legislation, Treasury Board policies,
agreements, and specific entity policies.
Internal Controls 14.12 Internal controls help to ensure transactions are appropriately
recorded and authorized. They also help to ensure business processes are
operating as intended. Weaknesses in internal controls can expose an
entity to business and financial risks. Internal control issues identified
included non-existent or ineffective internal review processes,
unauthorized transactions, timeliness of reporting, limited tracking of
inventory and asset disposals, and the need to update existing policies and
procedures.
14.13 An internal control issue that continues for the three significant
pension funds administered by Government, is the absence of a formal
policy and procedure manual. These funds include the Prince Edward
Island Public Sector Pension Plan (formerly the Prince Edward Island
Civil Service Superannuation Fund), the Prince Edward Island Teachers’
Pension Plan (formerly the Prince Edward Island Teachers’
Superannuation Fund), and the Pension Plan for Members of the
Legislative Assembly.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
What we found
• Consistent with prior years, expenditures were incurred for the year
ended March 31, 2020 without special warrants being authorized, as
required by the Financial Administration Act.
BACKGROUND
15.3 Special warrants are used when the Legislative Assembly is not in
session and funds are needed for operations in addition to amounts that
were included in the Appropriation Act. Unlike appropriation acts, which
require the approval of the Legislative Assembly, special warrants must be
approved by the Lieutenant Governor in Council through an Order-in-
Council.
15.6 For the year ended March 31, 2020, special warrants in the amount
of $28.6 million were issued for current expenditures, and special warrants
in the amount of $28.5 million were issued for capital expenditures.
Exhibit 15.1 provides a summary of these special warrants. The Audit Act
requires the Auditor General to list in detail, appropriations made by
special warrant, and the purpose of such appropriations. This information
is included in Appendix B of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 15.1
SUMMARY OF SPECIAL WARRANTS
MARCH 31, 2020
15.9 The total authorized special warrants, and special warrants net of
revenue and sequestrations, for each of the last five years are presented in
Exhibit 15.2.
EXHIBIT 15.2
SPECIAL WARRANTS
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31
($ Millions)
$60.0
$50.0
$40.0
$30.0
$20.0
$10.0
$0.0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Authorized Special Warrants
Special Warrants Net of Revenue and Sequestrations
Delay in Issuing 15.10 The Financial Administration Act prohibits expenditures from
Special Warrants being incurred unless provided for by an appropriation. When it is
expected that an appropriation will be exceeded, a special warrant should
be obtained prior to the expenditure being incurred.
15.11 Consistent with prior years, our audit identified instances where
special warrants were not authorized prior to the expenditure being
incurred. There were seven late special warrants required to cover
overspending for the March 31, 2020 fiscal year. Six of the late special
warrants totalled $8.7 million, and were authorized by Executive Council
on February 9, 2021, over ten months after year-end. The other late
special warrant of approximately $6.8 million, for the Department of
Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy, is expected to be authorized in
March of 2021, nearly twelve months after the 2020 fiscal year.
Recommendation
ENVIRONMENT, WATER AND CLIMATE 33,884,600 4,312,000 183,000 - - 38,379,600 37,169,875 1,209,725
CHANGE
EXECUTIVE COUNCIL 9,409,000 - 214,600 - - 9,623,600 8,511,086 1,112,514
FINANCE 54,829,500 - 917,300 - - 55,746,800 51,778,094 3,968,706
FISHERIES AND COMMUNITIES 39,243,600 - 183,100 - - 39,426,700 38,870,750 555,950
Expenditures are presented in accordance with the classifications in the Appropriation Acts 2019 and approved special warrants for the 2019-20 fiscal year. This format differs from the Province’s Operating Fund financial statements.
Expenditures are presented in accordance with the classifications in the Appropriation Acts 2019 and approved special warrants for the 2019-20 fiscal year. This format differs from the Province’s Operating Fund financial statements.
Grants $ 1,480,000
Professional Services 50,000
To provide annual funding to support the construction of the UPEI student residence on campus and
the development of a Shared Apprenticeship Management System.
Grants $ 500,000
ENVIRONMENT
Equipment 100,000
Grants - Alternative Land Use Services 30,600
Grants - Carbon Pricing Rebates 2,722,400
Grants - Water and Air Monitoring 20,000
To fund increased costs associated with carbon relief subsidies and new or expanded program
initiatives, partially offset by federal revenue of $667,300.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
To fund support for COVID-19 Program spending that was required prior to year-end.
To fund the Provincial Disaster Financial Assistance Program, fully offset by federal revenue.
HOUSING SERVICES
Grants 2,033,800
Professional Services 68,100
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
To fund additional program expenditures under Housing Grants, Child Care Subsidy, AccessAbility
Support Program and Social Assistance Program.
Grants 3,848,900
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
To fund additional program expenditures, including the Affordable Housing Development Program,
mobile rental vouchers, Community Needs Assessment and Home Renovations Program.
TOURISM PEI
Grants $ 650,000
Professional Services 157,700
To fund enhanced marketing and product development for the Province, partially offset by revenue of
$267,700 from the Mark Arendz Provincial Ski Park and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.
To fund construction for the mental health and addictions facilities, fully offset by funds sequestered
from Health PEI.
TOURISM PEI
To fund further development of the Confederation Trail, fully offset by revenue of $85,000 received
from Trans Canada Trail.
Bridges $ 450,000
National and Collector Highways 15,690,000
Provincial Paving 1,500,000 $17,640,000
Buildings 398,000
To fund year-end holdback adjustments relating to the Queens County Highway Maintenance Depot.
TOTAL SPECIAL WARRANTS ISSUED FOR THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR $57,131,400