0% found this document useful (0 votes)
336 views

Module 2. The Teacher As A Knower of The Curriculum Lesson 3 and Lesson 4 Learning Material

The document compares and contrasts four curriculum development models: Tyler, Taba, Saylor and Alexander. Tyler's model is deductive and top-down, starting with goals and objectives. Taba's model is inductive and bottom-up, starting with examining student needs. Saylor and Alexander's model is similar to Taba's in examining student needs but differs in specifying each step of development.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
336 views

Module 2. The Teacher As A Knower of The Curriculum Lesson 3 and Lesson 4 Learning Material

The document compares and contrasts four curriculum development models: Tyler, Taba, Saylor and Alexander. Tyler's model is deductive and top-down, starting with goals and objectives. Taba's model is inductive and bottom-up, starting with examining student needs. Saylor and Alexander's model is similar to Taba's in examining student needs but differs in specifying each step of development.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CURRICULUM

February 17, 2021

Module 2. The Teacher as Knower of the Curriculum


Lesson 2 and Lesson 4 Learning Activities
Lesson 3: Curriculum Development: Processes and Models

Similarities Tyler Taba Saylor and


Alexander

Tyler xxxx Tyler's and Taba's Domains before


models are both subjecting to the
linear in design. curriculum designing,
Linear models are not implementing and
curricular models that evaluating. Viewed

m
er as
follow procedural curriculum as a plan
steps. for providing sets of

co
learning opportunities

eH w
to achieve by the

o.
teachers
rs e
ou urc
Taba They both need to Xxxx View Curriculum is “a
examine the needs of plan for providing
the students or sets of learning
society by opportunities.
o

determining the Curriculum is set by


aC s

goals, objectives authorities.


vi y re

Saylor and they both need to Saylor and Xxxxx


Alexander examine the needs of Alexander's and
ed d

the students or Taba's model are


society by similar in a way that
ar stu

determining the they both need to


goals, objectives examine the needs of
the students or
is

society by
determining the
Th

goals, objectives

Difference Tyler Taba Saylor and


sh

Alexander

Tyler xxxx Tyler's model is Tyler starts at the top


deductive and Taba's of the steps or
is inductive.Tyler's procedures in
model of curriculum delivering while

This study source was downloaded by 100000803371249 from CourseHero.com on 06-16-2021 00:45:18 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/87114848/Module-2-The-Teacher-as-a-knower-of-the-Curriculum-Lesson-3-and-Lesson-4-Learning-Materialdocx/
development, Saylor and taba
management which uses
systems used in grassroot's approach
curriculum is which start from the
centralized, while bottom to top.
grassroots model will
evolve in a
decentralized
education system

Taba Taba approach Xxxx Taba's model had


believes in allowing specified each steps
the curriculum to be toward developing a
developed and/or curriculum, unlike
authored by the users Saylor and
(teachers). Tyler's Alexander's Model
curriculum is a that directly submits

m
lockstep model for the goals and

er as
development and is objectives to

co
the quintessential curriculum designing

eH w
prototype of without identifying the

o.
curriculum content and possible

rs e
development in the experiences that the
ou urc
scientific approach. learners attain.
Tyler's model is
different from Taba's
model because it
o

starts the steps of


aC s

curriculum
vi y re

development from the


top.

Saylor and Saylor and Saylor and Xxxx


ed d

Alexander AlexanderThe two Alexander's model is


models are different different from Taba's
ar stu

from each other for model for Saylor's


Tyler's model gives model directs the
consideration to steps to the four
is

experiences while the major steps but


latter does not. Taba's give attention
Th

to anything that may


interfere the learning
of the students
sh

This study source was downloaded by 100000803371249 from CourseHero.com on 06-16-2021 00:45:18 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/87114848/Module-2-The-Teacher-as-a-knower-of-the-Curriculum-Lesson-3-and-Lesson-4-Learning-Materialdocx/
Lesson 4. Foundations of Curriculum Development

Activity No. 2. Explore the Web

Instructions:
Search one outstanding personality in the cluster of Curriculum Foundations who contributed to
curriculum development. Write their biographies. You may find other persons not included in the
list given in this lesson.

Cluster 1 – Philosophical Foundations

m
er as
DR PIETER MOSTERT

co
Practical Philosopher and Education Consultant conversation specialist ... Doctor of Philosophy

eH w
(PhD)Philosophy, Education. 1988 - 1988.

o.
rs e
"To me, The Philosophy Foundation is a philosophy fountain, a source of fresh and creative
ou urc
ideas and materials, both playful and rigorous.
This is how philosophy should be practised: as a joyful discipline, a “gaya scienza”, as Friedrich
Nietzsche coined it."
o
aC s

Cluster 2 – Historical Foundations


vi y re

HOLLIS CASWELL (1901-1989)


Hollis Leland Caswell was an American educator who became an authority on curriculum
ed d

planning in schools. He directed surveys of curriculum practices in several school systems, and
ar stu

wrote several books on the subject

He believes that subject matter is developed around the interest of the learners and their social
functions. So, the curriculum is a set of experiences. Learners must experience what they learn.
is
Th

Cluster 3 – Psychological Foundations

JEAN PIAGET
Jean Piaget was a Swiss psychologist known for his work on child development. Piaget's theory
sh

of cognitive development and epistemological view are together called "genetic epistemology".
Piaget placed great importance on the education of children.

Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development had a profound influence on psychology,


especially the understanding of children's intellectual growth. His research contributed to the

This study source was downloaded by 100000803371249 from CourseHero.com on 06-16-2021 00:45:18 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/87114848/Module-2-The-Teacher-as-a-knower-of-the-Curriculum-Lesson-3-and-Lesson-4-Learning-Materialdocx/
growth of developmental psychology, cognitive psychology, genetic epistemology, and education
reform.

Cluster 4 – Sociological Foundations

JOHN DEWEY
John Dewey was an American philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas
have been influential in education and social reform. He was one of the most prominent
American scholars in the first half of the twentieth century.

Dewey thought that effective education came primarily through social interactions and that the
school setting should be considered a social institution. He considered education to be a

m
“process of living and not a preparation for future living”.

er as
co
Activity No. 3. SELF-REFLECT

eH w
o.
Reflect on this question: How will the thinking of Abraham Maslow influence your teaching
practice in the future? rs e
ou urc
In 1950’s year, Abraham Maslow became one of the founder and driving force of
o

Humanistic Psychology. In his theory it includes the Hierarchy of Needs, Self-Actualization and
aC s

peak experience where it became the fundamental subjects in humanist movement. The
vi y re

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs influence my teaching as it’s theory motivates in educational


circles. Maslow’s require that we need to satisfy first the series of our needs before we meet our
potential. As teachers do assess each student in adapting the instructions provided to meet their
ed d

needs in reaching the stage which is safety. It talks about the feeling of students inside the class
ar stu

and secure them in gaining trust. The next stage is what we call Self-esteem, it is where
students should feel that they belong and being loved inside the class. In the final stage we call
it Self-actualization where in all the previous stages are being achieved with full potential of
students where they listen and interfere inside the class.
is
Th
sh

This study source was downloaded by 100000803371249 from CourseHero.com on 06-16-2021 00:45:18 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/87114848/Module-2-The-Teacher-as-a-knower-of-the-Curriculum-Lesson-3-and-Lesson-4-Learning-Materialdocx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like