PMG Lab Report
PMG Lab Report
LAB TASK
REPORT
1
Design and Simulation of Permanent Magnet Generator
Submitted by
SRIDHARAN M
191EE228
MAY 2021
2
DECLARATION
I affirm that the lab task work titled “Design and Simulation of Permanent Magnet
Generator” being submitted as the record of original work done by me under the
guidance of Mrs. BHUVANESWARI S, Assistant Professor Level II, Department of
Electrical and Electronics Engineering
SRIDHARAN M
191EE228
3
Mrs. BHUVANESWARI S
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.2. principle 1
2 Main text
3.1. Result 5
6
3.3. load test of PMG
4 8
Conclusion
5 9
References
4
1.INTRODUCTION:
The main objective of this task is to design and simulate the permanent magnet
generator.
1.2. Principle:
A permanent magnet generator (also called PMA, permanent magnet generator, PMG,
or magnet) relies on a magnetic field generated by a permanent magnet to convert
mechanical energy into electrical energy. It can generate alternating current, allowing
you to power the entire motor and charge the battery.
The modern generator has both movable and fixed coils of wire. However, in a
generator, a moving coil called a rotor uses the current supplied through the slip rings
to create a moving field. Power is supplied from constant excitation coils.
• The stator consists of six coils of copper wire fused in fiberglass resin. It rests on the
spine and does not move.
• Bearings that rotate the shaft are equipped with magnetic rotors. There are two
rotors, one behind the stator and one in front, which are connected by long pins
through a hole in the stator.
• The blades are mounted on a single pin. They will drive the rotor of the magnet to
rotate and move through the coil. Electricity is produced during this process.
1
• The rectifier is positioned on the & ldquo; Aluminum heat sink & rdquo; keep cool.
The copper wire transfers the generated power to the rectifier, which works to convert
The PMG can be a DC voltage machine with brush and slip ring or, more often, a
polyphase AC synchronous machine, while the magnetic fields of the stator and rotor
rotate at the same speed. This eliminates field losses in the rotor, which typically
represent 20-30% of the total generator losses. The reduction in losses leads to a
decrease in the temperature in the generator, which means that a smaller and simpler
cooling system can be used.
If you are considering a permanent magnet DC generator, the inductor will be located
on the stator with a row of permanent magnets. But in the case of an alternator, the
inductor is on a rotor with a group of permanent magnets.
2
1.4. PMG DIAGRAM:
2. MAIN TEXT:
The use of PMGs has some disadvantages. One of the main drawbacks is that the
strength of the excitation magnetic field is fixed and cannot be controlled. Because of
this, the output voltage will depend on the rotational speed of the generator and in its
basic form it is best suited to fixed speed operations, such as standby plant, constant
speed wind turbines or hydro plant. To make use of the PMG within variable speed
asynchronous generation requires adaption. Operating RE generators at variable
speed depending on the strength of the driving resource has advantages and methods
have been developed to allow the use of PMGs in this configuration.
3
This allows the PMG to generate at a varying frequency and voltage, depending on the
rotation speed of the primary source. This is a complex and often expensive solution
and means of controlling the excitation of the PMG have been developed. One of the
most widely researched methods is varying the field strength by means of hybrid
excitation.
4
2D Simulation of a PM Generator in COMSOL Multiphysics
The simulation below was produced by my colleague Valerio so that you can see the model
in action:
3.1. Result:
Table 1 and Fig show that when the generator is rotated at a speed
of 2000 rpm, a voltage of 69.5 V is generated. When the rotational
speed is increased to 3000 rpm, a voltage of 223.7 V is generated.
By varying the rotational speed from 2000 to 3000 rpm, the voltage
will be increased from 69.5 to 223.7 V. The results of this test
indicate that the higher the rotating speed of the generator, the
higher the voltage. The tested generator has two poles, thus
theoretically, the nominal voltage will be achieved when the
generator's rotational speed is 3000 rpm. It is consistent with the
results of the test where a nominal voltage of about 220 V is
generated by the generator with rotational speed of 3000 rpm.
Table 1 and Fig. 6 also show that when the generator is rotated at a rotational
speed of 2000 rpm, a frequency of 33.5 Hz is generated. When the rotational
speed is increased to 3000 rpm, a frequency of 50.9 Hz is produced. By varying
the rotational speed from 2000 to 3000 rpm, the generator frequency will vary
from 33.5 to 50.9 Hz. The results of this test indicate that the higher the rotating
speed of the generator, the higher the frequency. The results of this test verify the
theory, because a nominal frequency of about 50 Hz is generated by a 2-pole
generator with rotational speed of 3000 rpm.
21
202.
0
5
18
17
0
3
15 146.
0 7
12 116.4
Voltage (V)
0
99.6 93.
9
0 2
73.
6 2
0 47.
3 7
0 0102030405060708090
Load (W)
7
results of this test indicate that there is a significant voltage drop
when the generator is loaded with a small load. It indicates that the
impedance of stator winding is quite high. The size of the stator
winding can be increased to achieve the higher capacity of
generator.
4. CONCLUSION:
5. REFERENCES:
9
RUBRICS FORM (*to be filled by the lab handling faculty only)
10