This Content Downloaded From 140.182.176.13 On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:45:11 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 140.182.176.13 On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:45:11 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to 19th-Century Music
To speak of a Romantic violin virtuoso as “he- commanded orchestras like an army general,
roic” has become a cliché, and like most clichés and played military music that seemed to glo-
it is entrenched in unexamined assumptions. rify the foregrounded individual. To many,
Take Paganini, for instance. We tend to re- Paganini seemed to emblematize military, not
member him as the archetypal Romantic art- Romantic, heroism.
ist, heroic in the Byronic sense; as a sovereign Paganini was not the only violinist who was
power blazing a path across Europe with his understood in this way. In the peculiar perfor-
unique virtuosity; as externalizing some innate mance culture of the decades following the
quality in the possession of unusual individu- French Revolution, it was not uncommon to
als. Yet the understanding of virtuosi as inscru- invest violinists with qualities of heroism,
table geniuses was a phenomenon that emerged power, and virility. We can glimpse just how
only long after Paganini’s death. In this article I much the nineteenth-century imagination dif-
want to suggest an alternative historical basis fered from our own by considering the bizarre
for the image of the virtuoso as hero. During violinist Alexandre Boucher (plate 1).1 Although
his own lifetime, Paganini was understood as forgotten nowadays, Boucher was very well
“heroic” not only because he resembled Byron known in the early 1800s, when he laid unique
but because he wielded his bow like a weapon, claim to the heroic title “Napoléon of the vio-
lin” through sheer coincidence, by bearing an
uncanny resemblance to the young military
This article grew out of a dissertation supervised by Susan
McClary. Many thanks go to Mitchell Morris, Elisabeth
Le Guin, and Anne Mellor, who made up my dissertation
committee. I benefited immeasurably from the opportu-
1I am grateful to Elisabeth Molle of the Agence
nity to present parts of this paper at the 2003 meeting of
the American Musicological Society, and from numerous Photographique de la Réunion des Musées Nationaux for
discussions with wonderful friends and colleagues, espe- her assistance in procuring a photograph of Girodet’s por-
cially Nadya Zimmerman, Dana Gooley, Michael trait of Boucher. The photograph is from a copy housed at
Beckerman, Lydia Goehr, and Jann Pasler. Finally, a spe- the Chateau de Versailles, the original portrait having been
cial thank you to my patient editor, Ruth Solie. destroyed in 1870.
19th-Century Music, XXVIII/2, pp. 89–107. ISSN: 0148-2076, electronic ISSN 1533-8606. © 2004 by the Regents of the Univer- 89
sity of California. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through
the University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions website, at http://www.ucpress.edu/journals/rights.htm..
general “in both face and figure.”2 Everyone episodes of “performance art” would Boucher
who encountered him agreed on the resem- commence his program of virtuoso violin mu-
blance, which Boucher exploited to the fullest. sic. He became extremely popular as an eccen-
He prefaced his violin performances with im- tric performer and as a formidable violinist, in
personations of Napoléon, taking up his well- some circles admired even more than Paganini.3
known poses—the proud stance with his hand
in his jacket, his manner of wearing his hat,
even his way of taking snuff. Only after such
3For more information on Boucher, see George Vallat,
Études d’histoire de moeurs et d’art des musicale:
Alexandre Boucher et son temps (Paris: n.p., 1890); Therese
2
Spohr encountered him in Brussels in 1819. See The Mu- Devrient, Jugenderinnerungen (Stuttgart: Carl Krabbe,
sical Journeys of Louis Spohr, trans. and ed. Henry Pleasants 1905), pp. 249–50; and Adolf Weissmann, Berlin als
(Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1961), p. 197. Musikstadt: Geschichte der Oper und des Konzerts von
90
5
Boucher’s act represented the extreme form of over again, to military bands. Take, for instance,
a wide-ranging phenomenon, a culture of per- the march in ex. 1, which makes an entire
formers and audiences who understood violin- military band of the violin, by Charles de Bériot,
ists as emblems of military heroism, even a violinist in the generation after Paganini. The
though not all violinists were fortunate enough violin repertory was saturated with musical
to resemble Napoléon. Virtuoso violin perfor- codes signaling the military: marches and fan-
mance was richly nuanced—aurally and visu- fares, imitations of trumpets and even of entire
ally—with codes of military heroism. Violin- bands—in other words, military topoi.
ists from Paganini to Boucher, Spohr to Lipinski, In this article, I argue that virtuoso codes of
wielded their bows like swords and commanded performance—a network of physical and musi-
armies of orchestral musicians, inviting com- cal gestures—combined to create the overall
parison with military leaders, ancient and mod- impression of the violinist as a hero, as a sym-
ern. Reviewers proclaimed them the Scipios, bol of military power. What I designate as “he-
Alexanders, and Napoléons of the violin. roic codes” were of course only one set within
Violinists’ military aura was created not only a larger semiotic network regulating the mean-
by the spectacle of performance but also by ings attached to virtuoso violin performance,
specific characteristics of the music they played. among them codes of diabolism, vocality, ex-
Our view of the violin repertory from the early oticism, and gender. Virtuoso codes provide a
1800s has been almost completely dominated way to frame a cultural critique of musical
by the staggering virtuosity of Niccolo Paganini. performance. By attending to the unique signi-
Certainly, the celebrated violinists had their fying powers of instruments and instrumental-
tricks, for example, multiple stops, left-hand ists, I am questioning typical accounts of musi-
pizzicato, astonishing new forms of bowing; cal meaning that privilege scores and assume
bel canto singing on the violin was also a pre- performers to be transparent vehicles for the
requisite for any solo player. But what the composer’s vision.
“Paganini eclipse” has obscured, historically This article is part of a larger project seeking
speaking, is a thread running through virtuoso to understand instrumental virtuosity as not
violin music: along with Paganini, many vio- only a musical phenomenon but a cultural one
linists of the time made reference, over and as well. In the so-called Age of Revolution
(1789–1848) a wave of virtuosity swept across
many cultural arenas besides musical perfor-
1740 bis 1911 (Berlin: Schuster and Loeffler, 1911), pp. mance—such as cooking, automaton-building,
128–29. One report comparing Boucher favorably to crime-detection, and chess—as historian Paul
Paganini was George Ludwig Sievers’s article in Caecilia
(1825): “[Paganini] is a silhouette, but nothing more, of
Metzner has shown. 4 My work builds on
Alexander Boucher. The two, so far as I know, have never
seen each other, but they are such kindred souls that
Paganini has become Boucher’s son. . . . There is style to
Boucher’s madness, but with Paganini this is wanting” 4
Paul Metzner, Crescendo of the Virtuoso: Spectacle, Skill
(quoted in G. I. C. de Courcy, Paganini: The Genoese, 2 and Self-Promotion in Paris during the Age of Revolution
vols. [Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1957], (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press,
I, 238). 1998).
91
92
efited from the huge popularity of military we think of as the unity of works was not often
bands, and so did “military” music for solo experienced. Indeed, a performance culture in
violin. which the substitution of one slow movement
If violinists were “heroic,” so too—in a broad for another was common practice suggests that
sense—were pianists, woodwind players, trum- concertos hung together somewhat loosely and
peters, and so forth. But violinists had special that the cultural work done by each movement
reasons for being seen as heroic figures over may be treated, to a certain extent, separately.
specialists on other instruments, even if not in Some concertos explicitly heralded their he-
the ways we have been accustomed to believe; roic-military character with suggestive titles:
rather, as we will see, there were reasons why the “Allegro marziale” of Paganini, the Con-
heroic codes worked particularly well on the certos militaire of Paul Alday le jeune and of
violin. Karol Lipinski, not to mention François Prume’s
Focusing on the concerto, and especially on Concerto heroique, and it is not difficult to see
first movements—on the ways in which or- how such works earned their names. Paganini’s
chestras imitated military bands, and on the “Allegro marziale”—the first movement of his
highly stylized role of the violin soloist—can Concerto No. 3—demonstrates all the hall-
help to illustrate why contemporaries heard marks of military music: the dotted rhythms,
violinists as emblems of military heroism. He- the stiff melody, and especially the euphoric
roic codes were usually confined to first move- use of cymbals to amplify the splendor of a
ments, though finales sometimes recalled the triumphant procession (ex. 2). The “Allegro
military topoi of opening movements by em- marciale” of Lipinski, Paganini’s Polish rival,
ploying similar instrumentation (trumpets and also evoked a victorious march: note the trum-
drums); whereas lyrical second movements pet fanfare and dotted rhythms (ex. 3).
served as contrast and drew on a different set of Concertos that begin by mimicking military
elements within the cultural context (for in- marches in this way were legion—as one can
stance, codes of vocality, femininity, and sub- see from the excerpted tutti scores from
jectivity). Polonaise movements in particular Rudolphe Kreutzer and Charles de Bériot (exs.
made it easy to accommodate military fanfares 4 and 5). Notice the fanfares, the angular melo-
and gestures (see, for instance, Spohr’s Con- dies, and the dotted rhythms. Even Beethoven’s
certo No. 2 and Paganini’s Concerto No. 3). In Violin Concerto—not usually considered one
a time when the three movements of a con- of his essays in the “heroic” style—signals the
certo were not always played sequentially, what military with the famous timpani strokes that
93
25
Example 3: Lipinski, “Allegro marciale” from Concerto Militaire, movt. I, mm. 21–28.
Allegro moderato
6
Example 4: Rudolphe Kreutzer, Concerto No. 14, movt. I, mm. 1–8.
11
ff
17
94
33
!
! ! ! ! !
153
dim.
Solo
36
energico
initiate the work. They have a “march-like char- radiance and serenity. They have tended, for
acter.”10 Indeed, in Beethoven’s time the mili- the same reason, to underplay the importance
tary association of the timpani was more clearly of a recurring passage employing thundering
audible than in modern times as the drums timpani that, together with the dynamics, af-
were smaller and struck with harder sticks, fect, and overall rhythmic drive, may suggest
which is often overlooked because commenta- battle music (ex. 6).
tors have been intent on emphasizing the work’s I turn now to the violin entry, where mili-
tary-style characteristics proliferate alongside
all the expected virtuoso techniques. More of-
ten than not, the violinist took up martial
10Boris Schwarz’s phrase in “Beethoven and the French themes from the opening tutti and gave them a
Violin School,” Musical Quarterly 44 (1958), 436. Of course,
Beethoven also relied on timpani to construct the military virtuoso spin by introducing higher registers
character of works like the Coriolan Overture, the Em- and ornaments. Take, for instance, Lipinski’s
peror Concerto, and the Symphonies Nos. 3 and 5. These way of recasting the military march on the
are the works more usually associated with Beethoven’s
“heroic” style—works of the middle period concerned with violin an octave higher than the orchestra’s
grand utterances and masculine display. Opus 61 rarely version (ex. 7, cf. ex. 3). And in Bériot’s Con-
joins this category despite having its own “heroic” style. certo No. 1, the solo makes its swashbuckling
Leon Plantinga has, however, compared Beethoven’s use
of timpani in the Emperor Concerto with “the timpani entrance with an energetic theme that, in this
strokes that had haunted the Violin Concerto, whose mar- high register, would hardly seem out of place in
tial intent he had made clear in the cadenza to its piano a heroic tone poem of Richard Strauss (ex. 8, cf.
transcription, composed at about the same time as the
Fifth Concerto.” See Beethoven’s Concertos: History, Style, ex. 5). (It is interesting to note in connection
Performance (New York: Norton, 1998), p. 272. with these examples an observation of Pierre
95
# #
" " " "
225
cresc.
ff ff
Baillot in his treatise of 1835 that the timbre of able individual holding his own against the
the violin could assume “the warlike brilliance amassed orchestra—an act of individuation ef-
of the trumpet.”11) fected in the shared musical language of mili-
As these examples show, the soloist alone tary topoi. And although the dynamic of one
was perfectly capable of accommodating mili- and many, individual and group, had always
tary elements and gestures. Yet nowhere did been paradigmatic of the genre, with the new
the violinist seem more heroic than when pit- political resonances of military-style music, the
ted against the gigantic forces of the orchestra. concerto came to define this dynamic in new,
The drama of a concerto lies in this basic prin- aurally discernible terms: as the relation of a
ciple of inequality: as the critic Fétis observed, valiant commander to amassed forces, or of a
the effect of a Paganini concerto was completely general to his army.
undermined when a pianist substituted the pow- Indeed, it is difficult to imagine that juxta-
erful orchestra.12 By recasting the orchestra’s posing passages of extreme virtuosity with gran-
martial themes in virtuoso style, the soloist diose martial tuttis would not have had a pow-
distinguished himself musically as a remark- erful rhetorical effect. In Allegro movements,
solo sections typically cultivate an intensifica-
tion in virtuosity and culminate in some sort
of flourish on a discord, the resolution of which
11
Pierre Marie François de Sales Baillot, The Art of the coincides with the commencement of the tutti
Violin, trans. Louise Goldberg (Evanston, Ill.: Northwest- section. Consider Paganini’s “Allegro marziale,”
ern University Press, 1991), p. 8.
12
In Brussels (1834), Paganini had been prevented from re- for instance, paying particular attention to the
hearsing and thus from playing “any of his big concertos.” end of the solo passage leading into the
Instead, he played “the great sonata on the G string” (prob- orchestra’s march (ex. 9). This downbeat ges-
ably the Sonata Militaire) with a pianist, prompting Fétis
to remark, “but what a difference between this sonata ture—where the last note of the solo phrase
reduced to the sparse accompaniment of a pianoforte and and the first note of the tutti phrase coincide—
the same work reinforced with all the power of an orches- had always been the rule of thumb in violin
tra, as it was conceived and as he always played it in
Paris!” (Quoted in de Courcy, Paganini: The Genoese, II, concertos, going all the way back to Vivaldi
153, from an article originally published in L’Indépendent). and Torelli. But in a “military” concerto the
96
97
98
99
100
101
6
Example 10: Boccherini, String Quartet in D Minor, G. 172, mm. 1–12.
(
March guerrière
'
ff
7
Example 11: Catel, “Marche guerrière” from Sémiramis, act I, sc. 5, mm. 1–8.
Along with the new bow came an array of course of an extensive discussion of musical
technical possibilities increasing the type, range, character (by which is meant “the general color
and volume of sounds to be drawn from the given to the expression of the composition”),
violin. An important development was the huge Baillot’s treatise illustrates how the violin may
increase in dynamic range and control over ar- assume a “martial” character.47 As examples of
ticulation the new bow enabled. Simulta- “martial” and “triumphant” playing, Baillot
neously, the old practice of holding the violin excerpts the third movement of a Boccherini
low on the arm (with the left hand propping up String Quartet (in 24, a march) and the “Marche
the instrument) was superseded by the modern guerrière” from Catel’s little-known tragédie
method of securing the violin under the chin, lyrique of 1802, Sémiramis—as shown in exs.
stabilizing the instrument parallel to the ground 10 and 11.48 These examples certainly contain
and freeing up the left hand.46 Employing the “military” traits (dotted and dactylic rhythms
“Cramer” bow on the newly secured violin predominate in both), but when performed in
enabled the player to draw louder, more pen- Baillot’s style they acquire an even more “mili-
etrating sounds. The development of new bow- tary” quality: elsewhere in the treatise he indi-
ing techniques and the development of the new cates just how these rhythms are to be ex-
model of bow went hand in hand. We know ecuted. The section entitled “Bow Strokes for
from a didactic source that violinists in the Alternating Long and Short Notes” advocates a
early 1800s deliberately cultivated a new bow-
ing technique that made possible for the first
47
time the execution of tight dotted rhythms—a Baillot states that musical character “can be divided into
four principal accents which serve as the source of the
key ingredient of the military style. In the others.” These are: simple: naïve (including such expres-
sive modes as semplice, pastorale, etc.); vague: undecided
(vivace, agitato, etc.); passionate: dramatic (appassionato,
militare [sic], etc.); calm: religious (tranquillo, religioso,
Metaphor,” Musical Quarterly 80 (1996), 234–64. Informa- etc.). The “martial” character appears under the accent
tion on the new practice of “Violindirektion” as exercised “passionate: dramatic.” Interestingly, Baillot notes that the
by Hanssens, Saint-George, Rolla, Spohr, Habeneck, et al. four accents “correspond naturally to the four ages of life
can be found in Adam Carse, The Orchestra (New York: and the general progression of the human soul,” suggest-
Chanticleer, 1949); and The Orchestra in the XVIIIth Cen- ing that the martial character is attainable only at a stage
tury (2nd edn. Cambridge: Heffer, 1950). of quite some “spiritual” maturity (for want of a better
46
As every student of music history knows, Spohr invented term). See The Art of the Violin, pp. 351 and 355.
the chin rest in the 1820s. 48
Ibid., p. 371.
102
Example 12: Viotti, Violin Concerto No. 2, Allegro assai, mm. 1–4.
method of bowing dotted rhythms—down-down bows and down-bows creates a visual demon-
up-up—which today is known as “hooked” bow- stration of order, control, and regularity. Ar-
ing: ticulating the shorter of the two notes clearly
requires an advanced bow technique unavail-
The violinist often encounters passages composed of able to Mozart’s generation, which confirms
long and short notes. It is important for him to fix the argument that “military heroic” codes were
his attention on these passages, since the bow strokes formed neither in composition alone nor in the
they need are almost never indicated. If the notes are mere climate of hero worship, but in the act of
played as written—each note with a separate bow,
performing and in a style that was new in the
one long and one short (which is, however, proper in
time of Baillot.51
certain cases)—this inequality makes the passage
awkward and inconvenient. Indeed, since the long
note generally requires a greater amount of bow and Gender Codes
the shorter note a lesser amount, the result is that at
the third and following notes, the bow gets closer Virtuoso codes of violin performance were
and closer to the tip, and finally the violinist runs gendered in several ways, ways so obvious to
out of bow. Another result is that if the violinist, in contemporaries as to have been transparent.
order to avoid this inconvenience, lengthens the short From the new symbolism of the violin as a
note by bringing the bow back a little and placing it feminine form (now no longer the “king of
where it will have room, he acts against the nature instruments”) and the bow as a phallic symbol
of the passage, for a short note must be played not
to the sexual connotations of male violinists in
only in a shorter space of time, but also with less
the act of performance, gender codes were ubiq-
bow, so that it will have the proper character for its
length.49 uitous. Perhaps the most familiar aspect of the
violin as gendered lies in descriptions of its
The alternation of up- and down-bow strokes, “voice” as feminine. Certainly the association
so awkward with the “Cramer” bow, had been of the violin’s long, singing lines with sopranos
standard practice with the old model of bow, has a venerable tradition. Heroic codes were, in
and Baillot spares no words to justify the new contrast, gendered masculine because military
technique. One of the examples he gives (ex. heroism and the exercise of power were the
12) illustrates the hooked bowing, which gives province of males; furthermore, the sight of a
a decisive character to the “military” style open- violinist lashing around with the bow, attack-
ing of Viotti’s Violin Concerto No. 2.50 Hooked ing the string aggressively, and disciplining the
bowing disciplines the bow arm and gives a resonance of that string with tight dotted
“militaristic” impression by enabling even bow rhythms seemed to enact sexual domination.
strokes: the distribution of the bow in propor-
tion with the rhythmic values 3:1 on both up-
51
It is safe to assume, I think, that in 1835 (when the
treatise was first published) Baillot was documenting a
practice that he and his colleagues had long been employ-
49
Ibid., p. 208. ing themselves, and teaching at the Conservatoire under
50
Ibid., p. 209. the mentorship of their master, Viotti.
103
104
105
106
107