Review: Types of Finish Lines or Gingival Margins Intooth Preparation
Review: Types of Finish Lines or Gingival Margins Intooth Preparation
Abstract:
The placement of finish lines has a directbearing on the ease of fabricating arestoration and on the ultimate
success of therestoration. Improper or inappropriateplacement of finish lines may result in failureof the fixed
prosthesis. This article reviewsthe various finish lines/ gingival margins intooth preparation along with its
evolution andthose preferred in special conditions.
Key words:
Introduction
Achieving close marginal adaptation is crucial Preservation of Tooth Structure
for the long-term clinical success of single- or
multiple-unit fixed-partial dentures (FPD) and Adjacent teeth
for the prognosis of the restored tooth. Luting
Iatrogenic damage to an adjacent tooth is one
agent solubility may, in time, result in gap
of the most common happenings in day to day
formation between the tooth and the
practice. Disturbing or damaging the proximal
restorative material, leading to micro-leakage,
contact area, will render the tooth more
plaque accumulation, caries and subsequent
susceptible to caries. This is presumably
failure of the restoration. Hence choosing the
because of the reason that the surface enamel
appropriate finish line based upon the
contains higher fluoride concentrations and the
restoration’s material and the condition of the
interrupted layer contains no or comparatively
tooth is essential to arrive at a successful fixed
less amount of fluoride. The anti-plaque action
partial prosthesis. of fluoride is washed away and the damaged
Principles of tooth preparation: tooth becomes more prone to plaque retention.
This damage to the adjacent tooth can be
The design of a preparation for a restoration minimized by the use of a metal matrix band.
and the execution of the design are governed The next method of minimizing the damage is
by 5 principles:1,2,3 the use of thin long end tapering diamond bur.
This minimizes excessive tooth reduction and
1. Preservation of tooth structure prevents undesirable angulations.
2. Retention and resistance
3. Structural durability Soft tissues
4. Marginal integrity
5. Preservation of the periodontium Damage to the soft tissues of the tongue and
cheeks can be prevented by careful retraction
with a mouth mirror, or flanged saliva ejector, the necessary retention and resistance
aspiration tip. Care must be taken while Retention prevents removal of the restoration
protecting the tongue when the lingual along the path of insertion or long axis of the
surfaces of mandibular molars are being tooth preparation. The essential element of
prepared. Injury to the gingiva is also to be retention is two opposing vertical surfaces in
avoided. This can be reduced through gingival the same preparation. These may be external
retraction. surfaces, such as the buccal and lingual walls
of a full veneer crown Resistance prevents
Pulp dislodgment of the restoration by forces
directed in an apical or oblique direction and
Extreme temperatures, chemical irritation, or
prevents any movement of the restoration
microorganisms can cause an irreversible
under occlusal forces.4
pulpitis, particularly when they occur on
freshly sectioned dentinal tubules. Pulpal Taper
damage can be caused due to accidental pulp
exposure, failure to use water coolant causing Taper is defined as the convergence of two
heating up of the burs. Prevention of pulpal opposing external walls of a tooth preparation
damage necessitates selection of techniques as viewed in a given plane. The extension of
and materials that reduce the risk of damage these 2 planes form an angle, the terms angle
while tooth structure is prepared. The location of convergence and angle of divergence can be
of the pulp chamber should be estimated using used to describe the respective relationships
radiographs, so that the perforation can be between the two opposing walls of a
prevented. This is more common in cases of preparation. The relationship of one wall of a
tooth preparation for all ceramic restoration or preparation to the long axis of that preparation
for those that require excessive tooth cutting. is the inclination of that wall.
Causes of injury
1. Temperature – inadequate water coolant,
excessive pressure, high rotational speed,
poor condition of the cutting instrument.
2. Chemical action – harsh chemicals that are
introduced as luting agents, restorative
resins, bases, degreasing purpose.
3. Bacterial action - left over infected
dentine, microleakage.
Fig 1: 2-3 degree of taper
Retention and Resistance
A tapered diamond or bur will impart an
No cements that are compatible with living
inclination of 2 to 3degrees to any surface it
tooth structure and the biologic environment of
cuts if the shank of the instrument is held
the oral cavity possess adequate adhesive
parallel to the intended path of insertion of the
properties to hold a restoration in place solely
preparation. (Fig 1) Two opposing surfaces,
through adhesive ion. The geometric
each with a 3-degreeinclination, would give
configuration of the tooth preparation must
the preparation a 6-degree taper. Theoretically,
place the cement in compression to provide
the more nearly parallel the opposing walls of
a preparation, the greater should be the
JCDUR 2017; Vol 8 (Issue 2): Page 59
Malini Murali et al. Finish lines in Tooth preperation
retention. Some early authors advocated the on a preparation for a metal-ceramic crown
use of parallel walls. However, it is not will leave the facio-occlusal angle too
practically possible to create perfectly parallel prominent, resulting in over contouring of the
walls and even the slightest undercuts created restoration, "opaque show through," or both.
will prevent the restoration from being well
seated.5 Structural Durability
The reason for periodontitis with subgingival However, a tooth that has been endodontically
margin could be due to improper finishing treated and is asymptomatic, with radiographic
leading to gingival inflammation, loss of evidence of a good seal and complete
attachment, bone loss and pocket obturation of the canal, can be used as an
formation.12,13 abutment. However, the tooth must have some
sound, surviving coronal tooth structure to
Biological width insure longevity. Even then, some
compensation must be made for the coronal
The dimension of the softtissue, which is
tooth structure that has been lost. This can be
attached to the portion of the tooth coronal to
accomplished through the use of a dowel core,
the crest of the alveolar bone."Crown
or a pin-retained amalgam or composite resin
lengthening" may be required to surgically
core.
move the alveolar crest 3.0 mm apical to the
placed finish line to maintain the biologic The supporting tissues surrounding the
width and prevent periodontal pathology. abutment teeth must be healthy and free from
inflammation before any prosthesis can be
Evaluation of fixed prosthodontics
contemplated. Normally, abutment teeth
If a tooth adjacent to an edentulous space should not exhibit mobility, since they will be
needs a crown because of damage to the tooth, carrying an extra load. The roots and their
the restoration usually can double as an FPD supporting tissues should be evaluated for
retainer. If several abutments in one arch three factors:
require crowns, there is a strong argument for
1. Crown-root ratio
the selection of a fixed partial denture rather
than a removable partial denture. Whenever 2. Root configuration
possible, an abutment should be a vital tooth.
3. Periodontal ligament area
References
1. Shillingburg, Herbert T. 1997.Fundamentals of 8. Gardner, F.M. Margins of completecrowns-
fixed prosthodontics.Chicago: Quintessence Pub. literature review. J Prosthet Dent.1982;48:396–400.
Co.P 119-133. 9. Hunter, A.J., Hunter, A.R. Gingival crownmargin
2. Rosenstiel, Stephen F., Martin F. Land, and Junhei configurations: a review anddiscussion. Part I:
Fujimoto. 2006.Contemporary fixed terminology and widths. J Prosthet
prosthodontics. St.Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier.P Dent.1990;64:548–552.
209-239. 10. Sato, T., Al Mutawa, N., Okada, D.,Hasegawa, S. A
3. Tylman SD, Malone WFP. Tylman's Theory and clinical study on abutmenttaper and height of full
Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics. ed7. St cast crown preparations. J Med Dent
Louis,CVMosbyCo, 1978. P 103. Sci.1998;45:205–210.
4. El-Ebrashi MK, Craig RG, Peyton 11. Kent, W.A., Shillingburg, H.T. Jr.,Duncanson,
FA:Experimental stress analysis of M.G. Jr. Taper of clinicalpreparations for cast
dentalrestorations. Part IV. The concept restorations.Quintessence Int. 1988;19:339–345.
ofparallelism of axial walls. J Prosthet Dent1969; 12. Dalvit, D.L., Parker, M.H., Cameron,S.M.,
22.346-353. Hawkins, M.C., Agar, J.R.,Brousseau, J.S.
5. Dodge WW, Weed RM, Baez RJ,Buchanan RN: Evaluation of marginangles of collarless metal
The effect of convergenceangle on retention and ceramicrestorations. Gen Dent. 2004;52:148–150.
resistance form.Quintessence Int 1985; 16.191. 13. Tiu, J., Waddell, J.N., Al-Amleh, B.,Jansen van
6. Newcomb GM. The relationship betweenthe Vuuren, W.A., Swain, M.V.Coordinate geometry
locationcofsubgingival crown marginsand gingival method forcapturing and evaluating crown
inflammation. J Periodontol1974;45:151-54. preparation geometry. J Prosthet
7. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR. Gingival crownmargin Dent.2014;112:481–487.
configurations: a review anddiscussion. Part
1:Terminology andwidths.JProsthet Dent
1990;64:548-52.
Address of correspondence
Malini Murali, CRRI, Tagore Dental College & Hospital, Chennai.
Email Id: [email protected]